Do Black Holes Create New Universes?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 гру 2019
  • Thanks to Brilliant for supporting PBS. Learn more at: brilliant.org/spacetime
    PBS Member Stations rely on viewers like you. To support your local station, go to: to.pbs.org/DonateSPACE
    What if every single black hole that formed in our universe sparked the big bang of a new universe? Cosmological natural selection proposes exactly this - but even better, it claims to be able to test the hypothesis.
    Sign Up on Patreon to get access to the Space Time Discord!
    / pbsspacetime
    Sign up for the mailing list to get episode notifications and hear special announcements!
    mailchi.mp/1a6eb8f2717d/space...
    Check out the Space Time Merch Store
    pbsspacetime.com/
    Physicists have been struggling for some time to figure out why our universe is so comfy. Why, for example, are the fundamental constants - like the mass of the electron or the strength of the forces - just right for the emergence of life? Tweak them too much and life, stars, galaxies, the universe as we know it wouldn’t exist. In recent episodes we explored one possible explanation for this - the anthropic principle and the idea of the multiverse. If there are countless universes with different fundamental constants, then it’s not surprising that a few exist with the right numbers for life - and certainly not surprising that we find ourselves in one of those good ones. But if you don’t like the anthropic principle - and many scientists don’t - then rest assured, there’s an alternative. You only need to accept two things: that our universe formed inside a black hole, and that universes can evolve.
    Hosted by Matt O'Dowd
    Written by Matt O'Dowd
    Graphics by Leonardo Scholzer & Adriano Leal
    Directed by: Andrew Kornhaber
    Executive Producers: Eric Brown & Andrew Kornhaber
    End Credits Music by J.R.S. Schattenberg: / @jrsschattenberg
    Special Thanks to our Patreon Sponsors:
    Big Bang
    Andrew & Brenna
    Alexander Tamas
    Craig Stonaha
    David Barnholdt
    David Nicklas
    Fabrice Eap
    John S
    Juan Benet
    Morgan Hough
    Quasar
    Mark Heising
    Vinnie Falco
    Hypernova
    Chuck Zegar
    Danton Spivey
    Donal Botkin
    Edmund Fokschaner
    Hank S
    John Hofmann
    John Pollock
    John R. Slavik
    Jordan Young
    Joseph Salomone
    Julian Tyacke
    Justin Ash
    Mathew
    Matthew O'Connor
    Syed Ansar
    Timothy McCulloch
    Gamma Ray Burst
    A G
    Adrian Hatch
    Adrien Molyneux
    AlecZero
    Andreas Nautsch
    Angela Prigge
    Bradley Jenkins
    Brandon labonte
    Dan Warren
    Daniel Lyons
    David Bethala
    DFaulk
    Eric Kiebler
    Frederic Simon
    Geoffrey Short
    Graydon Goss
    Greg Smith
    James Flowers
    Jamie Frederick
    John Funai
    John Griffith
    John Robinson
    Jonathan Nesfeder
    Joseph Dillman
    Josh Thomas
    Kevin Lee
    Kevin Warne
    Kyle Hofer
    Malte Ubl
    Michael Conroy
    Nick Virtue
    Nick Wright
    Patrick Sutton
    Paul Rose
    Robert Ilardi
    Scott Gossett
    Sean Warniaha
    Sipke Schoorstra
    Steve Bradshaw
    Tatiana Vorovchenko
    Tim Stephani
    Tonyface
    Yurii Konovaliuk

КОМЕНТАРІ • 7 тис.

  • @mhauser9457
    @mhauser9457 3 роки тому +924

    Dude I never understand a thing he talks about but I still watch

    • @mirak63
      @mirak63 2 роки тому +78

      @The Magician You have to teach yourself what the words mean.
      A good professor is not responsible of the amount of personal work a student should put in.
      Nobody understands everything at the first lesson, you have to notate what you didn't get and work it by yourself.

    • @the_letter_b
      @the_letter_b 2 роки тому +32

      He mentions at the end of some of these videos, like in this one, you'll need to understand certain things before you can really follow what he's saying well. The way the videos are presented appear like these are fun little clips for casual viewers with no background, but they're not. It's more like a couple of experimental discussions courses for physicist majors only available senior year or in grad school but presented in a visually appealing way instead of on a whiteboard / chalkboard.

    • @zorubark
      @zorubark 2 роки тому +4

      @@mirak63 And this video isn't a live teaching, you can google a lot of stuff

    • @markseslstorytellerchannel3418
      @markseslstorytellerchannel3418 2 роки тому +30

      @The Magician PBSSpaceTime has a different take than other science shows. They don't dumb things down for their layman viewers...their view is...if you can't keep up...that's on you. Agree or disagree, that is their philosophy.

    • @darkstar5805
      @darkstar5805 2 роки тому +14

      @The Magician if you try to learn about general relativity or quantum mechanics without understanding previous concepts like gravitation, Newton's laws of motion, etc it's your fault and not the teacher's. Everything has a process, you can't just jump to step 13 without learning about everything before that.

  • @ibeetellingya5683
    @ibeetellingya5683 3 роки тому +313

    In the course of watching this video, my mind reached its limit, burned out, and collapsed. Now all input I take in disappears, I'm denser than before, and nobody can get anything out of me.

    • @objectobject9099
      @objectobject9099 3 роки тому +15

      Is your big bang over yet?

    • @wahn10
      @wahn10 3 роки тому +29

      But huge silver lining: A new universe squirted out the other end of you.

    • @nukenomad6503
      @nukenomad6503 2 роки тому +1

      Brilliant

    • @nahCmeR
      @nahCmeR 2 роки тому +2

      Make a better universe next time thanks - everyone

    • @bartobarto3160
      @bartobarto3160 2 роки тому +3

      I am 29 years old and began to have interest in physics and I feel unhappy because I do law and maybe physics is my destiny. But I am still so bad at math that I can't read symbols on equations like they are distracting me and confuse me. Yes i managed somehow through school but only by imagination and making it feel right or just practicing but always each step learned why I do that. But now I can't solve equations and how could I do physics and leave law at almost 30 years old.
      Why Am I telling you this? Because I was always a kid with lots of imagination. And what I saw now what Einstein found out I had exactly this in my mind why objects move through space around other objects.
      I even had this imagination that objects fall down with elasticity to break trough the "atmosphere" of space what I think is dark matter over all.
      My English is not native but I will try to explain.
      The universe is flat plat and it's material is dark matter with dark energy.
      there are other universe and each of them are below the other.
      This flat universe is elastic. So if something is in it, it falls constantly down. It stretches the universe. Here comes the clue: If the objects falls down and sinks into the abyss of universe it also stretches into the other below universe flat plat. And it sinks and sinks for like trillion and more years.
      And Then it breaks and all the content from universe 1 comprehends into a small drop which contains all essence of the universe with all information and it drips into the next flat universe plat causing the big bang which is not Bang or explosion, it's just this small drop intrudes in a new blank universe plat causing to enhance and activate the universe plat and the information in the small blob (like a tear which falls from you eyes) causing to begin processes which led to almost same creation and developing of past universe.
      If you ask why? I can explain too. The universe which I think is flat and already a system in itself. It's content is blank because nothing introduded so far. But his material is pure dark energy fields and dark matter which have properties. Properties like a straight system of almost eternity small points of energy fields which wait content to drop into the playing field to activate and work. The universe and is small particles are all connected like you pixels on the screen. Exactly that's how I would describe it. The universe and is particles are like the pixels of your screen. And each pixel is a worker and creator. It only waits for orders and commands. The dark matter and energy is the fuel for all these pixels to work and create all together simultaneously something which you see as objects and atmosphere.
      And when this drop comes into the next universe it's like sperm giving life and content to a blank clear system. Then everything will arrange in billion or trillion years and will develop with trial and error a perfect system because each pixel is working while each pixel always connects and communicates with each other pixel and all pixel together in the whole universe as an overall super entity pixel.
      Like I sad I see this for the first time but I always thought that we are sinking and falling. And that's why we think we expand but in reality we only fall constantly down and stretch the universe which is elastic. Causing to stretch many other universe flat plates under our universe to stretch.
      Think of a elastic something gathered above the same elastic thing. If you put a heavy weight on top all level of the elastic thing will fall stretch down and object will fall.
      But then there is a limit were the first on top universe rip apart and all content information of this universe will comprehend back into a single drop which will now fall down and enter a new under neath universe causing to give it live with the informations from the old universe how it is gonna have to work and the pixels which activate because they get information and the dark matter fuelling the dark emergy to work and giving them maybe somehow of consciousness because every pixel like I sad is communicating each mili second (in reality it is real life and it can't be described with a number because it's love without a single delay) and each pixel of full knowledge of each other pixel which is trillions of lightyear away and connected to the whole system as a whole.
      We are falling not expending!
      And that is why light is always everywhere and for as humans always faster than everything. Because it's everywhere 100% of the universe. It's like the wave in a ocean. If you see the wave as the light, nothing can in this ocean faster than the waves therfore our light.
      The light in our universe exists from the energy exchange and interactions from all the pixels causing waves which work and the dark energy giving them fuel to work and energyze. That's why it is so fast because it was always everywhere. It's like the ocean contains water and if we humans thought that water=light, we would measure the speed of the water and see that it's faster than anything else when in reality it is not fast its just everywhere before now and after.
      And what I forgot each pixel knows over time how to work due the information of the past universe and each pixel will give each atom and particle orders how to work and react and how to behave. Like a switch from a DNA which can't turn on our off. Every little pixel in the universe has orders and properties and behaves like he has too.
      So basically the future is always written when we live in the present. The present is the future and there is no time like we humans invented. It's just we are living life and simultaneously with the universe.
      And I think if some of pixels get failures and malfunction that's why sometimes we get sick or other accidents happen because some particles failed or got desynchronized and can't connect live without a delay with the other particles in the universe.
      I don't know what how I do it but sometimes I can see future events to occur like a soccer game where I know that a team will wijj exactly 5:1 or will winn first halt 3:1 or the bar team will win 2:0 and so on or know which persons I will see next in the next day Whig I didn't see in years.
      and other stuff. Call me autistic and hyper sensitive that might be the case. Some friend in school told me in a game where we should say stuff about others and guess who that is that I am a mysterious guy.
      I sometimes get answers from someone else or wish something to happen and it happens and in the past I was scared because strange things happened and occurred like I wished or imagined. But i got used to it.
      A couple of month before I asked this strange power that he has to show me what it is all about and what we have to do as humans and what's our goal.
      The first 2 nights no answer but than on the third night he answered me in my dream and took my hand and showed me what is all about.
      In summary if you die you will exist as a conscious of many particles flying around and seeing everything oj earth but you can't interact. You also can't gather knowledge. You only can take everything you gatherer as a human and all your knowledge and education will stay fixed and continue on you new entity beeing which consists of many particles like a invisible cloud connected together.
      I REPEAT EVERYTHING YOU DO TILL YOUR LIFE WILL the only thing you can't take with you after death. That's what he shower me. The key and goals of human existing is to gather knowledge and if you for the energy of your consciousness, brain and thoughts is not vanished. It will live in the particles which connect and put everything together and you living on and watching. The bad part is her I REPEAT you stay this way. You are physically trapped and mentally trapped. You can't access new knowledge or make new memory's or train you capacity or whatever You stay as an observer which can think but can't do nothing.
      He showed me that a small exception exists. If you connect to the universe it itself in its whole you can make interactions like doing wind blows so people in a room maybe think there is someone there.
      I am not crazy I just know that I am right like Einstein was. I was always different kid somehow and I always solve riddles with intuition and always are right. If the teacher ask a difficult question on exams and all 20 in the class room sad B, I sad it's Z-G=P and I was right. I always am Right. It's just I can feel it I can sense it. Pls somebody help to solve this I can't do math that's my problem. It's somehow the universe wants me to only imagine it and not calculating it because something bad would happen because I would use it wrong if feel it.
      But Mark this in order to get out of the universe when we solve our universe we have to increase the life of humans. Because that's what is limiting us because people can't collect knowledge because everything gets more complicated and more content. The very best needs 40 years to get to the point where They understand Einstein and then are too old with 60 years. We have to increase human life to 150-240 years in order to use the knowledge and capacity of our very best. And by doing so normal people would also have more time to be more educated and maybe then useful because of intrinsic motivation to help us by working for the goal of understanding universe. More people would feel encouraged to learn math and explore the universe.

  • @mr.maccaman2
    @mr.maccaman2 2 роки тому +51

    A puddle finds himself in a ditch on the side of a road. One day he realizes the hole fits him quite nicely, perfectly, in fact. He says to himself, "My, this hole is perfect! It has that lump over there for me, and even has a crack right there. Why, this must've been made for me!"

    • @Mel-jf9gx
      @Mel-jf9gx 2 роки тому

      Do you know how many fundamentals you are comparing to just a ditch on the road? u should go and read more about the accuracy of the universe's physics

    • @mr.maccaman2
      @mr.maccaman2 2 роки тому +11

      @@Mel-jf9gx you should figure out what the analogy is about and look up the puddle argument lmao

    • @Mel-jf9gx
      @Mel-jf9gx 2 роки тому

      @@mr.maccaman2 I was talking in general, if we'll talk about how ur existence is just a coincidence then sure, the comparison fits perfectly, I mean if we were to assume a complexity factor it'll be nearly the same, they'll both get 10.. for humans tho it'll be 10 to the power 20.. but come on, they still have 10 in common.. no biggie

    • @mr.maccaman2
      @mr.maccaman2 2 роки тому +8

      @@Mel-jf9gx Complexity doesn't matter with what i'm saying though, and could you also cite a source for a 10^20 "complexity factor?" No matter how complex it is the analogy works. If the universe weren't suitable for intelligent life to evolve, then there would be no intelligent life to observe it. If there were no ditch in a road for a puddle to fall into, then there would be no puddle to observe it

    • @Mel-jf9gx
      @Mel-jf9gx 2 роки тому

      @@mr.maccaman2 Sure, complexity doesn't matter, it's all coincidence lol.. the 10*20 factor is just an assumption but it's more than that if you thought about the fact that it's not only about humans but also about the circumstances that could fit humans.. which raises the complexity factor.. but hey it's all coincidence!
      u know after the internet, lots of ppl picked up some unusual thoughts to prove to themselves that they are special and prove to the society that they are idiots.. gays, atheists, vegans, transgenders and I'm pretty sure there r more but the surface is creep enough so no need for digging in.. but atheists and coincidencers are the funniest.. it's like u r supposed to leave ur brain out when u join and use the word " coincidence " at each argument and also compare simple things to a 10*20 much complex stuff and assume that they're the same, I mean it worked with 1 so it should work with the rest of the numbers.. the funny thing is, while scientist were trying to discover how universe work they came up with general relativity and quantum physics which aren't linked tho based on ur idiocity they should, if it worked for micro then it should work for macro but u know it's not but we'll just ignore this and ignore common sense and also logic while we are at it.. all for seeking attention!

  • @ketheric
    @ketheric 2 роки тому +63

    "Is it better than a cool story.... bro?" 😂

  • @jeffandhisdogs
    @jeffandhisdogs 4 роки тому +47

    Finally, an explanation on how my experience with DMT went.

    • @NcedoWabantu
      @NcedoWabantu 4 роки тому +2

      Safe journeys to all ❤️

    • @johnshilling2221
      @johnshilling2221 4 роки тому

      LMFAO! And they get there without drugs! How is it that a lot of education leads people to manufacturer and believe the wildest and craziest things? Like Steve Martin on steroid enhanced hallucinogens.... absolutely none of this can ever be tested, or proven. They give their wildest guesses anyways!

    • @ohgodwhy3246
      @ohgodwhy3246 2 роки тому

      @@johnshilling2221 all the theories he has is his videos rely on the assumption that matter acts the same way throughout the entire universe.

  • @xzayler7311
    @xzayler7311 4 роки тому +666

    But if a black hole is a universe, what happens when a black hole is absorbed by another black hole? Do the universes collide? Do the constants average out?

    • @NZIsaacNZ
      @NZIsaacNZ 4 роки тому +164

      There is no "when". From the perspective of the black hole, you are disconnected from the normal passage of events, and would not be aware of the other black hole colliding with your black hole

    • @marc.ristau
      @marc.ristau 4 роки тому +42

      Expansion speeds up

    • @calculator91
      @calculator91 4 роки тому +48

      The moment the black holes collide would be the exact moment the event horizon is destroyed due to hawking radiation. You have to consider the infinities present in the math here, as nothing can pass into a black hole from the reference point of the greater universe due to infinite pressure of space-time. The only time the event can "occur" in the outer universe is when the singularity disperses.

    • @BradWatsonMiami
      @BradWatsonMiami 4 роки тому +36

      "'The BIG Bang-Bit Bang' was a supermassive white hole - inflation/expansion of energy and information 13.8 billion years ago - spawned by a supermassive black hole at the heart of a galaxy in our 'parent universe'. This duality combines general relativity’s singularities of infinite density in a ‘Cosmic Egg’ birth of this and all universes within 'The Conglomerate': multiverse without random bubble universes and parallel worlds. Our Universe exists inside the Planck density of that SBH and shares the same event horizon. That SBH-SWH seed phase transition was a 'quantum tunneling umbilical wormhole' with energy-matter and info transformed/transferred, although scrambled and encoded. This Universe is 1-in-2 trillion+ fractal offspring each with similar inherited ‘DNA’/physical laws. This ‘simple’ cause-and-effect cycle/circle of life - birth-life-death-transformation-rebirth - explains both infinite space and eternity. Reproduction is the simplest plan of continued existence for everything from cells to universes." - part of Seal #1 of the 7seals.blogspot.com

    • @jonasaur6462
      @jonasaur6462 4 роки тому +15

      both universes are destroyed and a new universe is formed

  • @gnomebanta2297
    @gnomebanta2297 2 роки тому +66

    I’ve been interested in this idea for a few years now and having it all laid out like this by PBS is SUPER satisfying!Thank you PBS!!

  • @phantom4902
    @phantom4902 3 роки тому +97

    I don't know what happens to me after 2am, but somehow I end up watching these videos from 2-4 am

    • @mrbrittas2243
      @mrbrittas2243 3 роки тому +3

      me too every night or rather morning.3.46am now time for 1 more

    • @GinoNL
      @GinoNL 2 роки тому +4

      Just laying in bed with your thoughts is terrible. That’s the reason I distract myself with these videos, at night

    • @williammccain4090
      @williammccain4090 2 роки тому +5

      That's the thirst for knowledge my boy embrace it

    • @slevinchannel7589
      @slevinchannel7589 2 роки тому

      I would BET that more stuff can 'evolve' than Humans
      currently assume.

    • @MrDino1953
      @MrDino1953 3 місяці тому

      You are not alone. I often wake up at some stupidly early hour of the morning, reach for my trusty iPad and watch PBS Spacetime videos.

  • @NewMessage
    @NewMessage 4 роки тому +858

    So.. even whole universes can be a disappointment to their parents...
    Makes me feel a bit better, I guess.

    • @Devadas44
      @Devadas44 4 роки тому

      Are your parents Armish? try your best to live a good life :)

    • @m_i_g_5108
      @m_i_g_5108 4 роки тому +1

      @@Devadas44 no, u

    • @xmastersrule
      @xmastersrule 4 роки тому +8

      How can you have 5 k subs and no content

    • @afonsodeportugal
      @afonsodeportugal 4 роки тому +3

      "Mediocrities everywhere, I absolve you!"

    • @reecem367
      @reecem367 4 роки тому +12

      Can you say something to me? I want to see what its like when I get a message from someone called New Message with the notification icon as their pic lol.

  • @blackmage-89
    @blackmage-89 3 роки тому +70

    I'm sure Darwin had _no_ idea his idea would have been pushed to the very edges of SpaceTime :D

    • @romancotton8536
      @romancotton8536 2 роки тому +7

      Biology is more of my field. He actually considered it. Especially due to his ability to recognize consistent patterns.

  • @kingsevil5255
    @kingsevil5255 3 роки тому +101

    Help I cant sleep unless I listen to specifically Australian astrophysicists 😵‍💫

  • @vincentherrell8421
    @vincentherrell8421 3 роки тому +46

    I have been waiting 11 years for a video like this to come out

    • @mastershake42019
      @mastershake42019 3 роки тому +2

      What? Why 11 years?

    • @vincentherrell8421
      @vincentherrell8421 3 роки тому +10

      @@mastershake42019 because that is when the idea of this came to my mind and I was wondering if anybody else had the same idea and maybe I was looking up the wrong stuff on the internet but I couldn't find anything similar

    • @ortherner
      @ortherner 3 роки тому +4

      Waiting 11 years for this is dedication.

    • @vincentherrell8421
      @vincentherrell8421 3 роки тому +3

      @@ortherner I love science what can I say

    • @pierfrancescopeperoni
      @pierfrancescopeperoni 3 роки тому +1

      Yeah, I'm still waiting for the "I am everything" video, or article, or whatever since 7 years. Studying physics I found about my intuition of static time, there is also a video on this channel, but I'm still waiting for my intuition of the one-identity.
      Yeah, I know the story "the Egg" which kind of shows this intuition, but it is not well explained, and it's too focused on the mystical rather than the rational.

  • @thomas6591
    @thomas6591 4 роки тому +337

    "Is it anymore than a cool story, bro?"
    Take this thumb. You earned it.

    • @Bradmhj
      @Bradmhj 4 роки тому +2

      The quantum mechanics of the universe is “fine tuned for life” those who understand QM come to see it is meticulously built like a castle of blocks. Very unlikely to form on its own unless theres an infinite number of chances. Hence the multiverse theory. An intelligent creator is just as likely
      god is outside of time in an eternal dimension we cannot understand. We simply can’t comprehend it yet. Like a blind person from birth trying to understand color. He can’t imagine it until he receives sight. Or a fish trying to imagine what life outside of water is like, it only knows that watery reality like we understand spacetime as linear. Our universe is incomplete in that it had a beginning, it’s obvious something infinite gave birth to it (space time). I encourage you to seek the truth and live life as with an eternal purpose. Our life very well may be forever recorded in the quantum field of space time. Quantum entangled with the universe, god, and choices of good and evil. There is a place for the righteous and also a place for those who live for selfish desires. The eternal being gave us the gift of eternal existence to share with Him. We just don’t see it yet because we our building ourselves into what we will forever become. Death is the door to finally finding the truth wether I’m right or wrong.
      Amazingly enough quantum entangled particles need no time to transfer information and act instantaneously, even if they’re separated across the universe! When one is effected the other is also. Everything we know takes time to travel even light. But if God is quantum entangled with us on a molecular level he would be all, in all. And if not in all at least within those who choose to accept his designed spirit. He would be within us and his holy beings(angels) working for him. This would allow him to instantly communicate and understand ourselves, prayers, etc. and also his angels who are currently at war with the dark forces of the devil He allowed to war against Him for the souls of us, the new eternal creatures of earth he has created. The Word says “we will even answer for every careless word spoken” meaning that all we say and do is recorded on some cosmic level and will follow us infinitely. If we live evil then our lives will haunt us in a place of just punishment where will see rightly so that we deserve to be there. Even if it seems unfair right now from our limited understanding on earth. Through death the veil will be lifted and well see what a dimension without time the way we know can truly exist.
      it’s easy to blame a God for our Original Sin through the first man. God is outside of time and knows the future already. You are predestined from birth through your own free will. Tragically many dig there own grave and god provides the shovel. Who are we to question HIS motives. Sadly you are likely to exist through eternal torment glorifying the creative being in his just punishment for your willful ignorance. You will never be 100% sure what comes next until you die, never. There will always be that 1% of eternal punishment. And that 1% out weighs the 99 the same way infinity outweighs 80 years of life. God gets the last laugh and it’s a laugh that echoes forever in a painful regretful existence, yikes. All I know is you’ve been given the choice and many choose to be a fool. Ultimately fooling themselves through the pride of knowledge and arrogance.
      P.S. I don’t mean to offend. This comment has been taken from a previous conversation :)
      I’m sorry maybe I wrote it poorly or you misinterpreted. Predestination and free will can coexist but many Christians struggle to comprehend how this could be possible. I’m not saying God forces people to sin or sends them on a road to damnation. I was saying he lays out before all of us the choices of life and death, right and wrong, good and evil. Even though he knows before we are born what choices we will make doesn’t mean it’s not our fault we make them. You may willfully choose to harden your heart. God knows that you would and ultimately did create you. But he didn’t create you for that purpose. It’s our choice ultimately. We see god as evil to let the world suffer. When we finally die we will see the truth. Also look at the animals we kill for food etc. God is far above us the way we are above them and we kill for sport lol. Not that I’m saying He does. But who are we to ask the greatest quantum mechanic of all “why did you make me like this and let all this bad happen” there humility and faith. Faith is not scientific at all but thought of as foolishness is some circumstance. But God chose what was foolishness to the world to confound the wise.
      At that time Jesus said, "I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and learned, and revealed them to little children.
      Humility and faith of a child is laughable to the worlds hardened and stubborn hearts.

    • @50PercentBS
      @50PercentBS 4 роки тому +4

      Cool story, bruv! 🤣

    • @Bradmhj
      @Bradmhj 4 роки тому

      50PercentBS some intelligent ppl think so ;)

    • @mihirnatani4479
      @mihirnatani4479 4 роки тому +7

      @@Bradmhj You didnt seem to understand quantum entanglement

    • @mihirnatani4479
      @mihirnatani4479 4 роки тому +5

      @@Bradmhj Entangled particle behaves the way it does if they are unaffected from their initial states. If u try to change properties of one of them they will no more be entangled . Eliminating the free will ( and thus eliminating so called "good" and "bad" people cuz their properties are preset )
      So pls stop saying unecessary things and try to use physics concepts to showcase your mindset .

  • @Longformula
    @Longformula 4 роки тому +174

    This is literally all I've been thinking about the last two days, crazy timing

    • @Biskawow
      @Biskawow 4 роки тому +5

      Ive heard about this long time ago and I find it very convincing

    • @mr.jglokta191
      @mr.jglokta191 4 роки тому +4

      was just about to write the same!

    • @kendomyers
      @kendomyers 4 роки тому +2

      Coincidence? I think not!

    • @kx7500
      @kx7500 4 роки тому +8

      There are infinite theories just as logical as this one, they are equally valid but this one is just aesthetically pleasing to us.

    • @sallyforth2955
      @sallyforth2955 4 роки тому +1

      Jake X I am pretty sure that most find the theory "God did it " most aesthetically pleasing.

  • @benmcreynolds8581
    @benmcreynolds8581 3 роки тому +89

    I have been living with this hypothetical idea of how the universe works for ever now. I look at ecosystems and I see that they recycle energy and find ways to keep a balance. So I can very easily imagine the greater universe ecosystem following in that manner. Black holes are the perfect candidate for a galactic recycler. The other end of a black hole could be a white hole that is a singularity point of unimaginable forces and states of matter that connect a tube between 2 bubbles that represent universes. Then the cycle can continue. Each universe has the ability to recycle energy and matter from itself to feed another universe, creating a ecosystem that is not wasting matter but reusing the matter from old to feed the new. Just like how forest's exist on our planet. It's symbiotic and destructive and creative all at the same time.

    • @MadameWesker
      @MadameWesker 2 роки тому +5

      💯💯

    • @blazednlovinit
      @blazednlovinit 2 роки тому +5

      You may have fallen into Einstein's trap, "the clockwork universe" where he couldn't imagine it being finite, he wanted it cyclical so it could be neat... it's probably a human inclination.

    • @joesmith942
      @joesmith942 2 роки тому

      Ecosystems are driven by two finite and external sources, the sun and planetary heat. Both will end, the systems will collapse.

    • @nikkibpainting
      @nikkibpainting Рік тому +1

      Exactly! I've had this theory since middle school! So glad modern science is finally talking about this!

    • @Deprived.drifter
      @Deprived.drifter Рік тому

      Love this

  • @newdefsys
    @newdefsys 3 роки тому +8

    Ah, 2019. I remember you. You weren't too bad after all

  • @pipolwes000
    @pipolwes000 4 роки тому +173

    "This video is only half way through"
    Credits roll

    • @DanielBeaver
      @DanielBeaver 4 роки тому +10

      I laughed out loud, great statistics joke XD

    • @antoine5871
      @antoine5871 4 роки тому +1

      Daniel Beaver ?

    • @vampyricon7026
      @vampyricon7026 4 роки тому +3

      Hmm... Where's the second half of the video?

    • @recklessroges
      @recklessroges 4 роки тому +2

      @@vampyricon7026 Sadly the doomsday ate it.

    • @vampyricon7026
      @vampyricon7026 4 роки тому

      @@recklessroges :'(

  • @scottryals3191
    @scottryals3191 3 роки тому +437

    The big bang can just as easily be a local event in a much larger universe. Once we reach the cosmological horizon we have no idea what lies beyond.

    • @antiisocial
      @antiisocial 3 роки тому +38

      That needs to needs to be a movie.
      Edit: Words are hard this late at night.

    • @acerbicatheist2893
      @acerbicatheist2893 3 роки тому +21

      And the edge is an event- horizon so we could easily be living inside a black-hole. Really very strange indeed... but I am thinking that every single time it's been even weirder than we thought when we got all gallus, thinking that we'd just about tied the bow at the top, only to find out that the entire picture needed radically changed as new ideas and techniques led to new data about the DYNAMIC UNIVERSE ... every single time one thinks COMPLETION, it equals stasis...equals DEATH! Static points on graphs tend to be terminal, or infinite, i.e. undefined. Avoid them. Life and living is always a dynamic process! Possibly the best word ever is DYNAMIC...or NEW, CHANGE, BEYOND THE HORIZON, PROBE, EXPLORE, AND LET'S GANG UP ON THE GUY WHO CAME UP WITH "CURIOSITY KILLED THE CAT!", because that's where stasis and ignorance and death begin.
      Thank you.
      Cactus Club 🌵🌵🍸😋👍❗🌵♣️🍸🌎 Extra dry and extra-large martinis all round! ⚡⚡✨😈👍🍸

    • @SmSyf
      @SmSyf 3 роки тому +4

      You don't understand space or time...

    • @Chance57
      @Chance57 3 роки тому +46

      @@SmSyf I'm sure you do. You'd be the first.

    • @St.petersEye
      @St.petersEye 3 роки тому +20

      They think the universe is flat but imagine its that big we can't see the curve!!!

  • @MiguelRuiz-vz5pm
    @MiguelRuiz-vz5pm 2 роки тому +8

    I always thought this but could never really back it up with a deeper theory. Until now, loved this video.

  • @kylegordon3675
    @kylegordon3675 2 роки тому +4

    I understand that if you reverse time, a black hole looks like our best guess at the big bang. But the idea that the mass in a black hole exits into another universe raises some questions. If for example, that material expands into a different space time, does the black hole lose that mass in this universe? Or is the entire newly created universe still 'on the books' in this one inside the black hole?

  • @radar9561
    @radar9561 4 роки тому +220

    I've always thought this concept feels intuitive and I love it. At the same time this kind of just delays the inevitable question ; if universes are formed by black holes how did the "first universe" and "first black hole" form? I'm pretty sure that's unfalsifiable. If we can somehow discover black holes make new universes don't we have to admit we can never understand our overall existence?

    • @Aizistral
      @Aizistral 4 роки тому +60

      No matter what theory you stick to, there will always remain a question bothering countless human minds - "But what was before that?". The only thing that may satisfy us is an entire casual infinity, with it's events extending infinitely far in both the past and the future. Even then, though, it may turn out to be unfalsifiable.
      I would prefer the answer of more aesthetical and, perhaps, philosophical nature: "In the beginning, there was nothing... But nothing must always give way to something."

    • @funkybibimbap6972
      @funkybibimbap6972 4 роки тому +30

      @@Aizistral but then the question becomes "How did something come out of nothing?", and it's maybe even more puzzling!

    • @RemiusTheAwesome
      @RemiusTheAwesome 4 роки тому +74

      I honestly am starting to believe that the NEED to answer this question is just a flaw of human reasoning. Literally no answer will ever satisfy our minds because there is always a question beyond the question.
      If GOD was to descend and explain the entire origin of existence.....the next logical question would be "but what about before that" or "but why" and the void of understanding would just repeat. Our thirst for knowledge is insatiable.

    • @masterchiefcarlos
      @masterchiefcarlos 4 роки тому +8

      @@RemiusTheAwesome Exactly! Humans are great at coming up with questions!

    • @LouisDies
      @LouisDies 4 роки тому +27

      The problem is that we are used to thing of everything in terms of TIME. We always ask: what happened before? But what happens if in reality, there was never a before... there is something that has always existed that interacted with timeless existent “somethings” that created time itself and everything else that create somethinng else

  • @the_venomous_viper1234
    @the_venomous_viper1234 4 роки тому +19

    Probably my favourite topic in Astrophysics and Cosmology - this is such a simple and beautiful idea that has such huge consequences

    • @VargVikernes1488
      @VargVikernes1488 4 роки тому +1

      It's not beatiful, it's sad and existentially horrifying.

    • @scullystie4389
      @scullystie4389 4 роки тому +5

      @@VargVikernes1488 why? I think it's fascinating

  • @mariodasilva8729
    @mariodasilva8729 2 роки тому

    Thank you for the inspirational thoughts, much more so than all the news channels, the drama and reality shows which do nothing to jump start the imagination of our aging and possibly waning intelligences! You are the channel I turn to for positive thinking!

  • @chrismcgarry3160
    @chrismcgarry3160 2 роки тому

    2:24 That "Universe Procreation" Animation gave me goosebumps the first time I saw it! Awesome stuff!

  • @RifetOkic
    @RifetOkic 4 роки тому +300

    Will PBS Spacetime ever release the soundtrack used in the vids ?

    • @RifetOkic
      @RifetOkic 4 роки тому +3

      synchromorph Have you seen the descriptions...? Its so extensive, might as well add a few tracks 😅.

    • @pcuimac
      @pcuimac 4 роки тому +3

      Buy a JD-Xi or Xm and you are ready to make your own. iPad & Korg Gadget software also does the trick.

    • @lrrrruleroftheplanetomicro6881
      @lrrrruleroftheplanetomicro6881 4 роки тому +11

      probably from some royalty free library.

    • @reducecotwo
      @reducecotwo 4 роки тому +3

      Patternbased.com might find it there, pretty extensive.

    • @Necatuss
      @Necatuss 4 роки тому

      I'll make you some like it if you wanna pay for it

  • @chrismf1407
    @chrismf1407 3 роки тому +27

    It's taken me over ten years of watching these sort of videos starting with David Attenborough and Brian Coxs series but finally now with in the past few months I'm starting to enjoy maths videos breaking down physics. I look forward to a deeper understanding.

    • @chrismf1407
      @chrismf1407 3 роки тому +3

      Also if anyone has any good recommendations of channels to watch which breaks things down mathematically please share. I like DrPhysicsA and Michel van Biezen.

    • @slevinchannel7589
      @slevinchannel7589 2 роки тому

      @@chrismf1407 Chris!
      Chris!!

    • @slevinchannel7589
      @slevinchannel7589 2 роки тому +1

      @@chrismf1407 I HAVE SCIENCE-RECOMMENDATIONS!!

    • @JohnZmith
      @JohnZmith 2 роки тому

      @@chrismf1407 ua-cam.com/users/PhysicsExplainedVideos

  • @annrobinette
    @annrobinette 4 місяці тому

    The amount of work and thought that goes into these are amazing!!

  • @Beweren
    @Beweren 2 роки тому +8

    I really liked this episode. These are some interesting philosophies that touch on some fundamental questions about our universe. Thank you PBS.

  • @steffeeH
    @steffeeH 4 роки тому +390

    Doesn't this theory rely on there being a "mother universe" that came first, and by chance had the perfect parameters to support the creation of black holes, to then launch this cosmological evolutionary tree of natural selection?

    • @purplemonkeydishwasher9818
      @purplemonkeydishwasher9818 4 роки тому +55

      steffeeH in the same way the bing bang or evolution describe how events propagated within a context, this theory would describe how constants and other proportions in universes balance without really needing to describe how it all started.

    • @steffeeH
      @steffeeH 4 роки тому +69

      @@purplemonkeydishwasher9818 True that, but it still feels like "putting the problem elsewhere" in the same manner as the panspermia theory.

    • @av3stube480
      @av3stube480 4 роки тому +46

      I think this question actually left the scope of physics and entered philosophy, but it's a damn good question, which I unfortunately cannot answer, and I'm guessing no one can :/

    • @GrungeMaster92
      @GrungeMaster92 4 роки тому +67

      not if past and future are infinate. if the future can be infinite than why cant the past. cause and effect are arbitrary. why not effect and cause. reverse entropy. we are biased to cause and effect because human brains only record the past. its arbitrary from our perspective.

    • @samheasmanwhite
      @samheasmanwhite 4 роки тому +37

      The "mother universe" could have been very poor at producing black holes, it would have only needed to produce enough to start the tree going, possibly just one, or it could have been a oscillatory universe that went through a Big Bounce multiple times before having the right parameters to spawn any black holes at all.

  • @sickone3060
    @sickone3060 4 роки тому +4

    The concept makes sense. If you change your frame of reference on a Penrose diagram in becomes clear. The closer you are to the event horizon the more the universe appears to contract into a singularity. While on the opposite, the closer you are to the singularity the more the universe appears to be expanding.

  • @AD-jq7ow
    @AD-jq7ow 2 роки тому +2

    That's crazy i've been thinking about that theory for years!!

  • @Larboga
    @Larboga 6 місяців тому +1

    I came up with this theory on my own so it’s cool to see a video on it

  • @MrGonzonator
    @MrGonzonator 4 роки тому +214

    So, does each daughter universe have less energy than the last, or does each scale to effectively set the energy to infinity?
    And what happens to matter added to an already existing black hole? Does it also add to the original energy content?

    • @MrTripcore
      @MrTripcore 4 роки тому +5

      MrGonzonator The same amount of energy

    • @CorwynGC
      @CorwynGC 4 роки тому +47

      Universes don't necessarily have a lot of energy. The energy of ours is pretty close to zero. What new Universes (or at least ours) have is Low Entropy.

    • @svenjansen560
      @svenjansen560 4 роки тому +54

      Because time stops at the singularity, there is no existing black hole the matter would be added to. It all arives at the black hole exactly at the moment the singularity Forms.

    • @Pathbinder
      @Pathbinder 4 роки тому +1

      I think in this case, the idea is that some of the energy somehow escapes the event horizon and goes on to the daughter universe

    • @philippl.2766
      @philippl.2766 4 роки тому +8

      Maybe the big bang of a universe is happening when a black hole evaporates to death by hawking radiation and explodes. That's when no more matter can be added.(?)
      For the rest of the questions, I have no speculations^^, sorry

  • @mutemiz
    @mutemiz 4 роки тому +106

    who else has a padawan understanding of the cosmos and watches this, doesn't get the math but still has a good time?

    • @jds77sam
      @jds77sam 4 роки тому

      Yup

    • @simul808
      @simul808 4 роки тому

      aye

    • @AMikeStein
      @AMikeStein 4 роки тому

      sIutybernice me... but I hope to change that.

    • @g700club3
      @g700club3 4 роки тому +2

      Probably most of us.

    • @DonMikimax
      @DonMikimax 4 роки тому +2

      While high... 😂😂😂

  • @guillaumemaurice3503
    @guillaumemaurice3503 3 роки тому

    Thank you for sharing this that was very interesting.

  • @adcaptandumvulgus4252
    @adcaptandumvulgus4252 Рік тому

    wow, thought of this on my own, glad it's been explored

  • @ThePunkPatriot
    @ThePunkPatriot 4 роки тому +59

    This only pushes the question back another step: why did the *first* black hole universe have fundamental constants that allow the creation of black holes?

    • @daniellittle9015
      @daniellittle9015 4 роки тому +9

      But maybe a universe with constants to make black holes is a much easier mystery to swallow than a universe with constants to create life.

    • @av3stube480
      @av3stube480 4 роки тому +2

      @@daniellittle9015 Very good point. I'm not an expert on black holes, but gravity being strong enough to eventually collapse into a singularity is easier to come across than perfect conditions to create life...

    • @cshairydude
      @cshairydude 4 роки тому +6

      What makes you think there was a first? It might be black holes all the way up. ;)

    • @Bradmhj
      @Bradmhj 4 роки тому +3

      Peter Berry The quantum mechanics of the universe is “fine tuned for life” those who understand QM come to see it is meticulously built like a castle of blocks. Very unlikely to form on its own unless theres an infinite number of chances. Hence the multiverse theory. An intelligent creator is just as likely
      god is outside of time in an eternal dimension we cannot understand. We simply can’t comprehend it yet. Like a blind person from birth trying to understand color. He can’t imagine it until he receives sight. Or a fish trying to imagine what life outside of water is like, it only knows that watery reality like we understand spacetime as linear. Our universe is incomplete in that it had a beginning, it’s obvious something infinite gave birth to it (space time). I encourage you to seek the truth and live life as with an eternal purpose. Our life very well may be forever recorded in the quantum field of space time. Quantum entangled with the universe, god, and choices of good and evil. There is a place for the righteous and also a place for those who live for selfish desires. The eternal being gave us the gift of eternal existence to share with Him. We just don’t see it yet because we our building ourselves into what we will forever become. Death is the door to finally finding the truth wether I’m right or wrong.
      it’s easy to blame a God for our original sin through the first man. God is outside of time and knows the future already. You are predestined from birth through your own free will. Tragically many dig there own grave and god provides the shovel. Who are we to question HIS motives. Sadly you are likely to exist through eternal torment glorifying the creative being in his just punishment for your willful ignorance. You will never be 100% sure what comes next until you die, never. There will always be that 1% of eternal punishment. And that 1% out weighs the 99 the same way infinity outweighs 80 years of life. God gets the last laugh and it’s a laugh that echoes forever in a painful regretful existence, yikes. All I know is you’ve been given the choice and many choose to be a fool. Ultimately fooling themselves through the pride of knowledge and arrogance.
      P.S. I don’t mean to offend. This comment has been taken from a previous conversation :)

    • @Bradmhj
      @Bradmhj 4 роки тому +1

      AIFAHRA HORGGHRO just because we can’t understand something doesn’t mean it’s not possible. We don’t understand many parts of quantum mechanics but we create theories. There’s just as much chance for intelligent design as there is for infinite universes. Faith isn’t scientific but scientist have faith in their theories.

  • @RT710.
    @RT710. 4 роки тому +12

    I’m so glad I live in a time where we can all digest and enjoy this information without fear of literal crucifixion!

    • @VargVikernes1488
      @VargVikernes1488 4 роки тому +1

      There are a lot of tabboo topics that are much closer to your everyday life that might get you socially crucified for attempting to bring them up. Like biological diversity of humans.

  • @tahah.babikir7698
    @tahah.babikir7698 3 роки тому +1

    Bro, you always give me the shivers.

  • @jadorbecker
    @jadorbecker 2 роки тому

    You always expand my mind man

  • @Jay-Kaizo
    @Jay-Kaizo 4 роки тому +307

    Love this channel. Even though most things are beyond my comprehension. :D

    • @coleman318
      @coleman318 3 роки тому +15

      One day we learn that everyone everywhere looks at one another thinking the exact same thing. Eventually one realizes we all deal with things beyond our comprehension; it just changes from person to person where the incomprenshion lies.
      When realizing the so called "experts" are ourselves, we finally complete our assimilation into adulthood, we decide to transcend our own difficulties and dilemmas whenever possible to help others find their way in this cosmic soup we call life!
      Keep swimming!

    • @keandreaanderson3650
      @keandreaanderson3650 3 роки тому +14

      Honey remember that this is not beyond your comprehension. It is only beyond the level of knowledge you have currently attained. Seek more, learn more, and you will find that these concepts actually aren’t that difficult to understand. There’s just a ton of information that you need to have in order to fully grasp the concepts. You’re here on the channel already. Use the internet as a tool to study this info and you won’t feel nearly as lost this time next year 😊

    • @xSynthor
      @xSynthor 3 роки тому +4

      Honestly the more incomprehensible and mindboggling their content is, the more fun it is to watch :D

    • @radaro.9682
      @radaro.9682 3 роки тому +1

      @@keandreaanderson3650 That's not really fair.....maybe they were not saying that as a "I can't get it" so much as "I am glad I don't have to comprehend everything here to get something from this channel".

    • @mjh5054
      @mjh5054 3 роки тому +3

      I watch pretty much all YT videos at 1.75x speed.
      That lifehack simply doesn't work on this channel though!

  • @Wallach_a
    @Wallach_a 4 роки тому +17

    I like the way he says “quarks”

  • @matgeezer2094
    @matgeezer2094 2 роки тому

    I've read the Lee Smolin book proposing Cosmological Natural Selection, another important point that wasn't mentioned here is that the daughter universe inherits many facets and fundamentals from the parent universe, as well as a slight shuffling of fundamental constants, which is mentioned. Thought I'd mention it, cause you need both effects - Inheritance and Shuffling for Cosmological evolution to happen. Its a really good video, as all the PBS vids are.

  • @jmanj3917
    @jmanj3917 2 роки тому +3

    Biological evolution requires a means of retaining genetic information to be further propagated in future generations. Wouldn't "the universe(s)" also require a means of "remembering" the fundamental constants which successfully formed them, in order to pass on the "traits" of its constants to its future generations? And, if so, what is that means allowing for the "memory" of the fundamental constants?

    • @incitatus634
      @incitatus634 Рік тому

      That might be the light absorbed by the holes. Photons are eternal since they don't experience time and they might be the way of the universe of maintaining that information. Exactly as CMB does.

  • @jamescotter
    @jamescotter 4 роки тому +72

    Some days I get so excited about how much humans know but then I realize that we don’t really know anything. It makes me want to jump forward a thousand years in the future.

    • @Godakuri
      @Godakuri 4 роки тому +6

      I have the same thoughts, but I instead get motivated to learn those questions myself. Main reason why I'm becoming a physicist

    • @Shiznoz222
      @Shiznoz222 4 роки тому +7

      The thing about science is: The more you learn, the more questions you have.
      In a thousand years I believe we will merely have a better understanding of how little we understand, albeit with unimaginably advanced technology to help us investigate those questions.

    • @lancetschirhart7676
      @lancetschirhart7676 4 роки тому +7

      @@Shiznoz222 I like to think of mankind's accumulation of knowledge as expanding concentric rings: the larger the ring, the more darkness touches the outer edge.

    • @_John_Sean_Walker
      @_John_Sean_Walker 4 роки тому

      No you don't.

    • @itchykami
      @itchykami 4 роки тому +3

      Unfortunately our fastest time machines only move at 1 second per second.

  • @Breadcrochets
    @Breadcrochets 4 роки тому +26

    Universes passing on their traits thru black hole “embryos “ leading to evolution by natural selection? I think this hypothesis should be called “the Anthropomorphic Principle” :P

    • @BradWatsonMiami
      @BradWatsonMiami 4 роки тому +3

      It's Nature. "'The BIG Bang-Bit Bang' was a supermassive white hole - inflation/expansion of energy and information 13.8 billion years ago - spawned by a supermassive black hole at the heart of a galaxy in our 'parent universe'. This duality combines general relativity’s singularities of infinite density in a ‘Cosmic Egg’ birth of this and all universes within 'The Conglomerate': multiverse without random bubble universes and parallel worlds. Our Universe exists inside the Planck density of that SBH and shares the same event horizon. That SBH-SWH seed phase transition was a 'quantum tunneling umbilical wormhole' with energy-matter and info transformed/transferred, although scrambled and encoded. This Universe is 1-in-2 trillion+ fractal offspring each with similar inherited ‘DNA’/physical laws. This ‘simple’ cause-and-effect cycle/'circle of life' - birth-life-death-transformation-rebirth - explains both infinite space and eternity. Reproduction is the simplest plan of continued existence for everything from cells to universes." - part of Seal #1 of the 7seals.blogspot.com

    • @thewhizkid3937
      @thewhizkid3937 4 роки тому

      But essentially that is how it appears. Even Hawking proposes such thing. A universe started from a singularity or "Black Hole Explosion"

    • @BradWatsonMiami
      @BradWatsonMiami 4 роки тому +1

      @@thewhizkid3937: At different times in his life, Hawking promoted the Big Bang coming from a supermassive black hole in our parent universe, and at other times, he promoted random quantum fluctuations as creating the Universe. Hawking was a militant atheist, therefore, he mistakenly promoted randomness and coincidence alot. Cause-and-effect has always been the basis of science.

  • @thomasstone7207
    @thomasstone7207 3 роки тому +2

    I have never had the proper training because I am dyslexic ... But I understand more that I should with the schooling I have had. Thank you for this series

    • @EinsteinKnowedIt
      @EinsteinKnowedIt 3 роки тому

      You ain't had much schooling. The fact of the matter is, even with schooling you can only believe half of what you here unless you are talking strictly Mathematics. This video is children's science because of mankind's stubbornness to think a knew about what makes up a universe.

  • @pphedup
    @pphedup 2 роки тому

    Live that first sentence; been waiting for it!

  • @pairot01
    @pairot01 4 роки тому +20

    Are the constants really "fine tuned"? I agree that if you changed them just slightly you wouldn't have atoms or chemistry, but do we know for certain that you would have *nothing* at all? It stands to reason that some sort of complex structure would come out from almost any arrangement of the constants, the rules of the game (fundamental forces and particles) are still there even if you shake them up some. The electromagnetic force would still bring electrons and protons (or whatever quarks form) together, even if they don't form into an atom they'd become something, and that something could bring forth life.
    If you give a kid a set of lego he builds a robot, give the same set to another one and he builds a spaceship.

    • @luc1pop
      @luc1pop 4 роки тому

      "...bring forth life" Could you please define life?

    • @pairot01
      @pairot01 4 роки тому +3

      @@luc1pop Something along the lines of complex structures with the ability of self-replication, ingestion, excretion, among others. A biologist could make a more precise list but reproduction is the key one.

    • @luc1pop
      @luc1pop 4 роки тому

      @@pairot01 so, if black holes creates universes that creates black holes, they are alive?

    • @pairot01
      @pairot01 4 роки тому +2

      @@luc1pop That's a VERY big if. But no, then I'd say the Universe itself is alive and black holes are analogous to reproductive organs, because black holes wouldn't be creating just black holes.

    • @producer_nikko
      @producer_nikko 4 роки тому +1

      "electromagnetic force" think on this path. Think magmatism... How are magnetic fields created? How pervasive are they throughout our universe? These are questions we have answers too, yet not applying these answers to old outdated theories.

  • @paulbrown5937
    @paulbrown5937 4 роки тому +32

    Wouldnt daughter universes contain less matter, meaning eventually the iteration ends when there is not enough matter for even a single black hole within the daughters?
    Also would the highest tier parent of said chain of black holes have so much mass that it would eventually (or even quickly) form one single black hole aka a big crunch?

    • @panosb3755
      @panosb3755 4 роки тому

      interesting question. i can imagine it as the movement of the metamers of a caterpilar. The top tier parent disappears and the last child becomes a mommy. So there would be an infinate gradient of matter, since we asume that black holes constantly absorb matter creating new universes.

    • @Michael18599
      @Michael18599 4 роки тому +3

      Yeah, I was wondering the same thing.

    • @Lancor84
      @Lancor84 4 роки тому +1

      Although I'm absolutely the wrong person to ask stuff like this, after a couple dozen of episodes here I'm confident to say, that the amount of matter 'before' the big bang doesn't... well matter.

    • @Tfin
      @Tfin 4 роки тому

      @@Lancor84 Matter + energy, since they're the same, but they can only ever have what they have, as it can be neither created nor destroyed.

    • @mckennaConfig
      @mckennaConfig 4 роки тому +7

      @@Tfin you're forgetting about anti-matter. The amount of matter in our universe isn't a result of how much matter came into existence at the big bang, rather it is leftover from a yet unknown asymmetry between matter and anti-matter during the big bang. Which, matter/anti-matter pairs are net zero energy. Ergo, the smallest black hole could lead towards the biggest universe and it just comes down to the physics constants created.

  • @hero314
    @hero314 2 роки тому +1

    This is one of their finest videos.

  • @brent7900
    @brent7900 Рік тому +3

    This is what I’ve always imagined about black holes and big bangs!

  • @Ryvucz
    @Ryvucz 4 роки тому +4

    Perfect time for binge watching everything I've missed.

  • @Nocholas
    @Nocholas 4 роки тому +4

    I love how near the end you lead the audience on so many times before you finally get to your catch phrase "space-time"

    • @EinsteinKnowedIt
      @EinsteinKnowedIt 3 роки тому

      All of which has no meaning other than the tri) of how objects move and behave. Space time does nothing to explain an eternal and infinite universe. That is what should be self explanatory.

  • @mastermindrational1907
    @mastermindrational1907 2 роки тому

    Great idea exploration.

  • @truecrony
    @truecrony 2 роки тому +1

    The gravity of the walls of the Black Hole that we are inside of pulls our Universe from every direction and this is the Dark Energy runaway expansion we observe.

  • @-fuk57
    @-fuk57 4 роки тому +11

    Why does this make sense to my heart?

    • @dreggory82
      @dreggory82 4 роки тому +2

      A fractal universe feels right, I agree.

    • @nickolasbrown3342
      @nickolasbrown3342 4 роки тому +1

      the fact it feels right makes me think it's wrong lol

  • @williamburdzel637
    @williamburdzel637 3 роки тому +3

    For some reason this crossed my mind for quiet some time, it does make sense

  • @wilybilyy
    @wilybilyy 2 роки тому +1

    4am in the bed, trying to sleep and this question comes into my mind out of nowhere and here i am

  • @leviathoncannon
    @leviathoncannon 2 роки тому

    Your comment on speculative ideas help us explore the vast space of possible realities, sounds like exactly what artists do. Humans seem to love hypothetical universes.

  • @griffinbuckerfield9988
    @griffinbuckerfield9988 3 роки тому +3

    Old video but that end segment reminds me of how the right key on the ring is always the last one you try

  • @JDoG867
    @JDoG867 4 роки тому +6

    I’ve considered this for years now. Interesting to hear about it on this channel.

    • @squidly2112
      @squidly2112 4 роки тому +1

      Here, let me correct that for you : ".. with an actual science fiction explanation"

    • @Bradmhj
      @Bradmhj 4 роки тому

      Joseph K my theory is these black holes collapse into a single mother universe of eternal time. This universe had a beginning. The other does not and intelligently created ours. Our individual being has been created and will exist eternally, the same way time had a beginning but will go on eternally.

  • @fabzerodez
    @fabzerodez 3 роки тому +2

    One of my favorite episodes. Thanks guys!

  • @stefanimurray8543
    @stefanimurray8543 2 роки тому +4

    I’ve always liked to imagine what it would look like to be at the center of a singularity.Because the event horizon would be inescapable,it would probably seem as if all sides in every direction would be moving away from you,similar to expansion,and the center would probably be at any and every point because of its expansion.

    • @Hydrocarbonateable
      @Hydrocarbonateable 2 місяці тому

      I imagine it's either a crystal (nothing is moving/energetic) or it's the opposite and everything is just energy, making it a very brightly glowing soup.

  • @TheExoplanetsChannel
    @TheExoplanetsChannel 4 роки тому +1

    PBS Space Time uploads and ESA launches the CHEOPS exoplanet telescope, *best day of the year!*

  • @youngOG87
    @youngOG87 3 роки тому +5

    I believe this is the nature of the universe(s). Makes the most sense to me.

  • @tryptime
    @tryptime Рік тому

    I LIKE THE ENDING, CLEVER.

  • @SamtheIrishexan
    @SamtheIrishexan 2 роки тому +2

    I have wondered this very thing for many years and until they prove it wrong I subscribe to the idea. It would make sense that eventually the pressure and heat would cause a singularity that could subsequently go bang.
    Maybe physics are only constant in our individual universe.

  • @vishnar2515
    @vishnar2515 4 роки тому +4

    That's the question I asked myself that same question many times when I was in middle school.

  • @mb1287t
    @mb1287t 4 роки тому +29

    This means that the CMB is actually the event horizon of a massive black hole that houses our universe. Instead of the universe expanding, it is only an illusion while matter is shrinking.

    • @Equiluxe1
      @Equiluxe1 4 роки тому

      We are in a black hole,well as from last thursday.

    • @MrGonzonator
      @MrGonzonator 4 роки тому +1

      Not really the event horizon in a black hole sense, since time didn't start there but some 400,000 years prior.

    • @marlonjohnson8812
      @marlonjohnson8812 4 роки тому +1

      You got it and that's what also gives the perception of time.

    • @youtube_acct_42
      @youtube_acct_42 4 роки тому +2

      Matt Barrett everything uniformly shrinking is a neat thought. I wonder if that is testable.

    • @marlonjohnson8812
      @marlonjohnson8812 4 роки тому

      We already went into the black hole and have already intertwined with another galaxy.

  • @armus550b
    @armus550b 2 роки тому +1

    I've often thought this was the case. Either that or the big bang is a bubble formed from the collision of two other universe bubbles

  • @scarlettthebrave7379
    @scarlettthebrave7379 2 роки тому

    I’m learning lots from these videos but equally learning a lot from the discussions in the comments 😊

    • @mcmacshalfilya
      @mcmacshalfilya 2 роки тому

      U just may be the prettiest one in this universe

  • @MrGreenYolk
    @MrGreenYolk 4 роки тому +102

    We see fractals all throughout nature. Could the universe be a multidimensional fractal of black holes?

    • @TheArunster
      @TheArunster 4 роки тому +9

      I also ask my self this question. It seems so plausble too me, but we'll never know if the way we perceive the universe is just too narrow and things work totally different on a big scale just like in the quantum world.

    • @samheasmanwhite
      @samheasmanwhite 4 роки тому +10

      There is a bit of a serious jump between those two concepts, but no, black holes will always be a sphere whatever number of dimensions they have, so couldn't really form such a structure. The fabric of spacetime itself though, you might be able to fold that up into some reality warping bs to hurt your brain with :)

    • @samheasmanwhite
      @samheasmanwhite 4 роки тому +3

      @Geoffrey Harris Ay, but the surface is still spherical no matter how warped the volume is radially. Although now that I think about it rotation is assumed to stretch it, at least for external observers.

    • @TheArunster
      @TheArunster 4 роки тому +5

      I think entropy just uses the most efficient way to unfold in space and that way is in fractals. Same thing over and over again just always a little bit different. That's the way we expirience time and also that's the key to life and evolution. The same think repeated over and over again would have no time but entropy forces things to a lower energy potential and so it's always evolving in the most efficient way.

    • @samheasmanwhite
      @samheasmanwhite 4 роки тому +2

      ​@@TheArunster The idea of increasing entropy driving time has always interested me, but there isn't any metaphysical reason that a system couldn't evolve without changing entropy, even though you can't do that in our universe I don't think changing entropy is required for time to flow (although maybe if we find a planet sized blob of bose-einstein condensate we might find that time passes slower near it), but it may still set the direction of time (I think a spacetime video even covered that). Not sure of the connection to fractals though, I get it in a DMT-trip sense, but what would it mean for space to have a fractal structure? Fractals don't change without changing their parameters so do you imagine the parameters of the fractal change over time due to some force?

  • @franzperdido
    @franzperdido 4 роки тому +65

    As child-verses only are a fraction of their parents, does this mean that the mass of new universes decreases exponentially with the number of generations?

    • @Daltem
      @Daltem 4 роки тому +5

      Most likely, but maybe some energy conservation shenanigans happen with negative energy \_('-')_/

    • @rikosaikawa9024
      @rikosaikawa9024 4 роки тому +5

      Mitosis son

    • @hitbox7422
      @hitbox7422 4 роки тому +6

      I thought the same, but when natural constants can change, then maybe also the amount of energy needet to produce certain amounts of mass.

    • @famicomnintendo
      @famicomnintendo 4 роки тому +6

      If the universes are infinite, then then even a fraction of them are still infinite

    • @dohktarkaratchi-grabbahr5291
      @dohktarkaratchi-grabbahr5291 4 роки тому +3

      This is insane! I know this math and there is absolutely NO REAL SCIENCE here. No real physics, just people postulating. This research is pointless because there are no black holes. There is electro dynamics and angular momentum, that's it. Gravity is not its own force, there is just charge and attraction and the order of everything in this universe is set up from sub-atomic to universal scale by electrical current and associated magnetism. This math requires no arbitrarily set speed of light, no bs constants, no equation adjustments and it also makes actual, logical sense. When you do a physics equation ladies and gentlemen, and you come away with an answer of -0 or infinity, you have f'd up the math.

  • @lukewormholes5388
    @lukewormholes5388 2 роки тому

    thank you lee smolin for giving us such a beautiful idea, even if not correct

  • @archive2500
    @archive2500 2 роки тому +3

    9:41 "And the lower the mass of the strange quack, the easier it is to convert light particles into strange quacks." 🦆
    -Matt

  • @dianagibbs3550
    @dianagibbs3550 4 роки тому +63

    "Error can lead the way to truth, while empty-headeness only leads to more empty-headedness, or to a career in politics." -Master Li, "Bridge of Birds" by Barry Hughart.

    • @daryljonesfoster4102
      @daryljonesfoster4102 4 роки тому +2

      That was the dumbest thing a man can say . His mom should've definitely swallowed when he was a single cell organism.

    • @DeadKingIsDead
      @DeadKingIsDead 4 роки тому +1

      Good one hahaha

    • @DeadKingIsDead
      @DeadKingIsDead 4 роки тому

      @@daryljonesfoster4102 it's really a profound teaching my friend.

    • @Bradmhj
      @Bradmhj 4 роки тому

      DeadKingIsDead The quantum mechanics of the universe is “fine tuned for life” those who understand QM come to see it is meticulously built like a castle of blocks. Very unlikely to form on its own unless theres an infinite number of chances. Hence the multiverse theory. An intelligent creator is just as likely
      god is outside of time in an eternal dimension we cannot understand. We simply can’t comprehend it yet. Like a blind person from birth trying to understand color. He can’t imagine it until he receives sight. Or a fish trying to imagine what life outside of water is like, it only knows that watery reality like we understand spacetime as linear. Our universe is incomplete in that it had a beginning, it’s obvious something infinite gave birth to it (space time). I encourage you to seek the truth and live life as with an eternal purpose. Our life very well may be forever recorded in the quantum field of space time. Quantum entangled with the universe, god, and choices of good and evil. There is a place for the righteous and also a place for those who live for selfish desires. The eternal being gave us the gift of eternal existence to share with Him. We just don’t see it yet because we our building ourselves into what we will forever become. Death is the door to finally finding the truth wether I’m right or wrong.
      it’s easy to blame a God for our original sin through the first man. God is outside of time and knows the future already. You are predestined from birth through your own free will. Tragically many dig there own grave and god provides the shovel. Who are we to question HIS motives. Sadly you are likely to exist through eternal torment glorifying the creative being in his just punishment for your willful ignorance. You will never be 100% sure what comes next until you die, never. There will always be that 1% of eternal punishment. And that 1% out weighs the 99 the same way infinity outweighs 80 years of life. We’ll see who gets the last laugh. All I know is you’ve been given the choice and many choose to be a fool. Ultimately fooling themselves through the pride of knowledge and arrogance.

    • @rainbowrocket3981
      @rainbowrocket3981 4 роки тому

      u'FO 🌈 OF'u
      parT 🌈 Trap
      exAMEN🌈FIRM'amen'T,
      waterFALLS. seaLEvEL
      Dr.🌏ip
      👀☔
      Go fish ¿ 🐟
      Psalm 19:1 The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork.

  • @lexzbuddy
    @lexzbuddy 4 роки тому +7

    Finally. I thought about this back when I was a student at university in the 90s. I just haven't came across anyone else that had thought about anything similar.
    Great to see and seriously happy. Thanks for the video:)

    • @KevAlberta
      @KevAlberta 4 роки тому

      don't matter don’t matter

    • @KevAlberta
      @KevAlberta 4 роки тому

      don't matter true say

  • @cyrilkeir88
    @cyrilkeir88 11 днів тому

    You probably don't read these anymore, but here goes anyway.
    I've stumbled across your channel recently, and have binge watched and consumed so much of this information, and it has helped immensely with furthering my theory, so THANK YOU! I independently came to the conclusion that black holes are the birth process of universes due to the nature of data encoding as planck bits on their surfaces being projected inward into their own pocket dimensions (universes). To see this, validated SO much for me!
    I actually have a theory that I have not yet heard anywhere, and a differential equation to describe my theory- And if I can solve the variables, it will give us the necessary energy requirements to form our own pocket dimensions! 🙂

    • @cyrilkeir88
      @cyrilkeir88 11 днів тому

      Side note @pbsspacetime I would like to submit a possible rebuttal to the neutron star being 2.17 solar masses being "potential falsification of the theory". It is quite possible since we ALSO recently discovered that the "cosmological constants" are less "constant" than we once theorized, and depending on when the neutron star formed, perhaps it formed during a time where the "solar mass threshold" was different?

  • @nickacelvn
    @nickacelvn 3 роки тому

    This is how it works. We have so much to learn.

  • @AntaresTeam
    @AntaresTeam 4 роки тому +15

    I hope to see the day you will write a book describing black holes in the same way you explain them in your videos. It would be the holy bible on this topic, and probably as huge as it, but damn man I would read it even during my job!
    Take this suggestion seriously, I'm pretty sure many of us followers would be happy to see that day coming

  • @KatarupaYT
    @KatarupaYT 4 роки тому +8

    If other universes may have different values on the "dials" of the fundamental constants, is it also possible that some universes may have more or less fundamental constant dials than others?

    • @johnshilling2221
      @johnshilling2221 4 роки тому +3

      Isn't it just amazing how all of these discussions start with -- it might be possible, some people think, we believe, the math suggests...... and before you know it, a few paragraphs later, entire civilizations are built upon an established foundation so generously laid out for you in a few prior paragraphs! LOL!

    • @quantumsword296
      @quantumsword296 4 роки тому +1

      Perhaps the number of dials is just another dial which can be adjusted

  • @KingKing-yw4xe
    @KingKing-yw4xe 2 роки тому

    I love to see the story of Dr. Wudi. He observed timelapse of all Universes. He holds a very different view. He has an unusual Theory of Everything. He has been observing in silence since 2017. If you make a video about him, I think it would be a truly fascinating story.

  • @K0wface
    @K0wface 2 роки тому +5

    Here’s my dumb theory:
    The universe began with the formation of a black hole and that it is this black holes’ gravitational effect which is the reason behind the stretching of space time that we observe in our universe is occurring at an accelerating pace. You may ask, why is our space time then accelerating in its expansion and not just expanding at a decreasing rate since we know that black holes shrink over time via Hawking radiation? My response would be to bring up the effect that gravity wells as extreme as a black hole have significant effects on time in accordance to Einstein’s General Relativity. I therefore propose that the black hole that started this universe created the Big Bang. Both the effect that the gravity of black holes have in the expansion of space as well as acceleration in its expansion which can be explained by being due to the matter continuously being consumed by the black hole as a relatively steady rate. If surveyed from outside of the black hole, this consumption would occcur on the nanosecond scale timeframe. However, our perspective from inside this extreme of a gravitational well that has effectively stretched our space time flat, implies that this increase in mass of the black hole is a rather slow process which has continued over the course of our universe’ existence. This makes sense as black holes do not necessarily stretch space time to infinity. Instead they stretch it to the extremes of reality in which our modern mathematical models break down. However, we know that over time, these black holes are shrinking implying that the gravity well is not truly infinite but must be equal to the mass needed to generated the Hawking radiation required of a black hole to fully evaporate. While we have observed only small fractions of this occurring in our universe, the mathematics surrounding their predicted existence and behaviors is well supported by numerous simulations.
    Perhaps this stretching is directly responsible for seemingly near perfect stretching of our universes’ space time. With exception of the specs of matter (which we attribute to the matter of our universe) affect it. Perhaps we could measure the rates at which the universe has been expanding as use it and the estimated age of the universe to backtrack the history of space time and potentially measure the mass needed to make the black hole that made us.

  • @johnapple6646
    @johnapple6646 4 роки тому +27

    so early the big bang hasn't even started yet

  • @Grazey
    @Grazey 4 роки тому +3

    The problem with this is the same problem as with simulation theory.
    Every universe would have to be the result of a blackhole in a previous universe which causes a paradox.
    There has to be a host universe that formed in a different way.

    • @thewhizkid3937
      @thewhizkid3937 4 роки тому

      But if each universe is distinct, mathematically universe A and universe B.
      If I consider mutually exclusive events. The events that happen in universe A are independent of Events that occur in Universe B

    • @JAlexCarney
      @JAlexCarney 4 роки тому +1

      Just like how biological evolution doesn't try to explain the origin of life, the idea in the video does not claim anything about the origin of universes.

  • @lordblob2173
    @lordblob2173 2 роки тому +3

    Great video, I really like this idea of universes evolving and your way of explaining!
    But wouldn't this recursive universe in black hole in universe in black hole create infinite mass, energy and information? (or would these universes be cut of completely?)
    Have an great day!

    • @gabeheartz13saravia97
      @gabeheartz13saravia97 4 місяці тому

      Well, some people claim that the physical laws of the universe seem to be distorted by black holes, physics (as we know them) breaks down. This may also include the thermodynamic law of energy conservation.
      But there’s no real way to know. Perhaps every universe thins out overtime or maybe like all living creatures, it’s finds an alternative source of matter/energy to sustain itself.

  • @aivokallo77
    @aivokallo77 3 роки тому +14

    I've been thinking about this same thing a lot. Humans will never find the answer but the video is, once again, great.

    • @L2p2
      @L2p2 2 роки тому +2

      well we might bro we just might

  • @dandatiles8404
    @dandatiles8404 3 роки тому +3

    YES.
    Occam's razor, the simplest explanation is usually the right one.
    What comes in , must come out.

  • @Conceptcreator
    @Conceptcreator 4 роки тому +243

    honestly this i have been thinking for sooooo long! but the thing that makes me doubt is the energy, feels like it would have to little to create something so huge?

    • @questioningitall6856
      @questioningitall6856 3 роки тому +25

      Yes but there is so much excess energy. Taking into consideration the multitudes of invisible and or negative energies. It could be just transforming this invisible/negative energy into a visible/positive energy. In this sense energy is still not destroyed nor created but transferred.

    • @Scorch428
      @Scorch428 3 роки тому +21

      E=mc^2 so even a small mass of a black hole would create a ton of energy for a new universe

    • @briannalarsen127
      @briannalarsen127 3 роки тому +60

      I'd think huge is relevant. Were huge to an ant. A skyscraper is huge to us. These new universes may only have a fraction of the energy of the mother universe, but to us it would still seem like a huge amount, because we dont have a reference point.

    • @BradWatsonMiami
      @BradWatsonMiami 3 роки тому +6

      Albert Einstein is the key to the reincarnation question. Either someone returns with 'Beyond Einstein Theories' including the 'Theory of Everything' (Unified Field Theory), Reincarnation Theory and claims to be Einstein reincarnated or no one shows up proving there is no reincarnation.

      == The Conglomerate - Universe Creation Theory (combining GOD/Nature, ancient religions, physics, astronomy/cosmology, general relativity, quantum mechanics, chaos theory, biology, chemistry, mysticism, & philosophy) ==

      This Universe exists because it's our playground.

      'Energy can’t be created or destroyed in an isolated system'. ‘The BIG Bang-Bit Bang‘ inflation/ expansion of energy and information into the void 13.8 billion years ago was a supermassive white hole spawned by a supermassive black hole at the heart of a galaxy in our ‘parent universe‘. This duality combines general relativity’s singularities of infinite density in a ‘Cosmic Egg’ birth of this and all baby universes within ‘The Conglomerate‘: multiverse without random bubble universes and parallel worlds. "In the beginning", the Planck density of the core of a SBH acts as a birth canal. ‘Quantum bounce SBH-SWH seed transitions‘ are ‘quantum tunneling umbilical wormholes‘ with energy-matter and data transformed/transferred, albeit scrambled and encoded. Our Universe is 1-in-2 trillion ‘self-similar offspring‘ each with the same inherited physical laws (‘DNA’). The ubiquitous cause-and-effect ‘circle of life cycle‘: birth-life-death-transformation-rebirth explains infinite space and eternity - a requirement. Reproduction is GOD/Nature’s simple plan to greatly spread life for everything from cells to universes. - Seal #1a of the 7seals.blogspot.com

      This has triggered The Apocalypse/Revelation which is NOT the ‘end of the world‘ - it‘s the return of the Christ and Albert Einstein reincarnated.

    • @MortalAfterAll
      @MortalAfterAll 3 роки тому +7

      @@briannalarsen127 "The mother universe" or A mother universe, what if it is all infinite, universes upon universes and so on

  • @dragovian
    @dragovian 2 роки тому +6

    Why didn't black holes spontaneously form at the first time-steps ("planck" time) and immediately fill all the universe,as it was expanding?
    Are they not able to be formed under any mass/energy circumstance?
    Even if the inflation of the space itself was faster than the rate of black-hole-ification(so it got big before black holes could "eat" the whole universe), in the early universe where everything was really close, should result in black holes with big % of the entire universe's mass.

    • @Spectramaton
      @Spectramaton 2 роки тому +1

      A big bang event would relate to the affect of a large volume of mass would have on space. It is not like a bang where we came from one spot, but more like all observable existence shows evidence of our space having been propelled all simultaneously in a similar manner at some point, and even at our current visible scale, large clumps of mass can stretch space faster than light can travel across it. Imagine a mass so large it pulls on space so hard that it causes the space of a universe to stretch to it's limits. I imagine this is why our universe is expanding. There could likely be a mass so great that is pulling our visible area of space and of course much much more beyond that as well. This would explain why the universe is spreading faster and faster, as the space gets more and more stretched by this growing festering unfathomable mass which has created this crevasse of space where we reside, of which we can only observe very little in relation to the scale of things. Relativity allows us to see all the other matter near us as rather stationary due to moving at similar speeds. The mass in our area of space is not the driving force of the expansion of the observable universe, and must exist in a goldilocks zone of sorts, to be far enough away from the driving force in space and time to experience the universe with relatively temperate local cosmic activity (in comparison). Black holes are all over as mass attracts mass. The distortion of Space appears to be somewhat limitless, or at least can stretch faster than the speed of light. It may be that once the mass becomes so great it beats the limit of space, punching a hole through it, ejecting particles violently into nothingness, only to some time eventually have them all gather again due to the inherent properties of mass attracting mass. One could argue that all of our visible matter is only here because it was on it's way to that local extreme limit gathering of mass, pulling all of us fatefully back into the cycle.

  • @comatose3788
    @comatose3788 3 роки тому

    One of my comments from 20 years ago. Glad someone is paying attention ...

  • @paulmichaelfreedman8334
    @paulmichaelfreedman8334 4 роки тому +6

    Hi Matt! Thanks, I've been waiting for this one. I have pondered this subject for a long time myself. I do have a question. How does time factor in? Does the new universe come into existence as the black hole forms, or after it has accumulated a certain amount of mass, exceeding a limit?

  • @Ryan-Fkrepublicnz
    @Ryan-Fkrepublicnz 3 роки тому +90

    "we live in an endlessly evolving proliferating space-time", seems about right.

    • @BradWatsonMiami
      @BradWatsonMiami 3 роки тому +4

      Albert Einstein is the key to the reincarnation question. Either someone returns with 'Beyond Einstein Theories' including the 'Theory of Everything' (Unified Field Theory), Reincarnation Theory and claims to be Einstein reincarnated or no one shows up proving there is no reincarnation.

      == The Conglomerate - Universe Creation Theory (combining GOD/Nature, ancient religions, physics, astronomy/cosmology, general relativity, quantum mechanics, chaos theory, biology, chemistry, mysticism, & philosophy) ==

      This Universe exists because it's our playground.

      'Energy can’t be created or destroyed in an isolated system'. ‘The BIG Bang-Bit Bang‘ inflation/ expansion of energy and information into the void 13.8 billion years ago was a supermassive white hole spawned by a supermassive black hole at the heart of a galaxy in our ‘parent universe‘. This duality combines general relativity’s singularities of infinite density in a ‘Cosmic Egg’ birth of this and all baby universes within ‘The Conglomerate‘: multiverse without random bubble universes and parallel worlds. "In the beginning", the Planck density of the core of a SBH acts as a birth canal. ‘Quantum bounce SBH-SWH seed transitions‘ are ‘quantum tunneling umbilical wormholes‘ with energy-matter and data transformed/transferred, albeit scrambled and encoded. Our Universe is 1-in-2 trillion ‘self-similar offspring‘ each with the same inherited physical laws (‘DNA’). The ubiquitous cause-and-effect ‘circle of life cycle‘: birth-life-death-transformation-rebirth explains infinite space and eternity - a requirement. Reproduction is GOD/Nature’s simple plan to greatly spread life for everything from cells to universes. - Seal #1a of the 7seals.blogspot.com

      This has triggered The Apocalypse/Revelation which is NOT the ‘end of the world‘ - it‘s the return of the Christ and Albert Einstein reincarnated.

    • @adriangoleby
      @adriangoleby 3 роки тому

      Agreed

    • @BookOnThrough
      @BookOnThrough 3 роки тому +1

      @@BradWatsonMiami Sounds like you really got it all figured out.

    • @paulburley7993
      @paulburley7993 3 роки тому +1

      @@BradWatsonMiami Yikes!!!

    • @BradWatsonMiami
      @BradWatsonMiami 3 роки тому

      Albert Einstein is the key to the reincarnation question. Either someone returns with 'Beyond Einstein Theories' including the 'Theory of Everything' (Unified Field Theory), Reincarnation Theory and claims to be Einstein reincarnated or no one shows up proving there is no reincarnation.

      🎀 The Conglomerate of Universes - Creating Universes Theory 🎀
      combining GOD/Nature, the reincarnating God-incarnate, theologyancient religions, physics, astronomy/cosmology, general relativity, quantum mechanics, chaos theory, biology, chemistry, mysticism, & philosophy)

      'Energy can’t be created or destroyed in an isolated system'.
      ‘The BIG Bang-Bit Bang‘ inflation/expansion of energy and information into the void 13.77 billion years ago was a supermassive white hole spawned by a supermassive black hole at the heart of a galaxy in our ‘parent universe‘. This duality combines general relativity’s singularities of infinite density in a ‘Cosmic Egg’ birth of this and all baby universes within ‘The Conglomerate‘: multiverse without random bubble universes and parallel worlds. "In the beginning", the Planck density of the core of a SBH acts as a birth canal. ‘Quantum bounce SBH-SWH seed transitions‘ are ‘quantum tunneling umbilical wormholes‘ with energy-matter and data transformed/transferred, albeit scrambled and encoded. Our Universe is 1-in-200 billion ‘self-similar offspring‘ each with the same inherited physical laws (‘DNA’). The ubiquitous cause-and-effect ‘circle of life cycle‘: birth-life-death-transformation-rebirth explains infinite space and eternity - a requirement. Reproduction is GOD/Nature’s simple plan to greatly spread life for everything from cells to universes. - Seal #1a of the 7seals.blogspot.com
      This Universe exists because it's our playground.

      This has triggered The Apocalypse/Revelation which is NOT the ‘end of the world‘ - it‘s the return of the Christ and Albert Einstein reincarnated.

  • @Taime88
    @Taime88 2 роки тому

    Entropic principle point:
    Yes, if you move 1 or two values, you disrupt the building blocks of life here.
    But if you calibrate each one, you can create the same conditions at different value sets.
    Like we were saying with diprotons. You can manipulate the scales to allow it to create at least orbiting bodies.
    There's also the idea:
    We talk about a primary 20 scales here, with others included.
    What if in those other universe, one of the other non main scales, WAS a main scale, and one of our main scales weren't?
    Or, what if each scale was a main scale, for an exceptionally fine tuned universe?

  • @d.g.1986
    @d.g.1986 3 роки тому

    I've ALWAYS thought this is what happens in a black hole... Glad I found this.

  • @karlfranzemperorofmandefil5547
    @karlfranzemperorofmandefil5547 4 роки тому +6

    That has some very interesting implications for science fiction.

    • @TheEnigmaticDeenTruth
      @TheEnigmaticDeenTruth 4 роки тому

      🤷🏿‍♂️🤷🏿‍♂️🤦🏿‍♂️🤦🏿‍♂️

  • @TheReaper569
    @TheReaper569 4 роки тому +3

    10:44 that quirky smile of satisfaction when you demolish someone elses argument

  • @bouncyzimzim7927
    @bouncyzimzim7927 3 роки тому +3

    Since in theory space/time switch roles in a black hole, what if black holes lead back to the start of our own universe. So basically the universe would be self contained and fueling its own creation.

  • @doodelay
    @doodelay 2 роки тому

    I definitely buy that the laws come from selection effects