In the course of watching this video, my mind reached its limit, burned out, and collapsed. Now all input I take in disappears, I'm denser than before, and nobody can get anything out of me.
I am 29 years old and began to have interest in physics and I feel unhappy because I do law and maybe physics is my destiny. But I am still so bad at math that I can't read symbols on equations like they are distracting me and confuse me. Yes i managed somehow through school but only by imagination and making it feel right or just practicing but always each step learned why I do that. But now I can't solve equations and how could I do physics and leave law at almost 30 years old. Why Am I telling you this? Because I was always a kid with lots of imagination. And what I saw now what Einstein found out I had exactly this in my mind why objects move through space around other objects. I even had this imagination that objects fall down with elasticity to break trough the "atmosphere" of space what I think is dark matter over all. My English is not native but I will try to explain. The universe is flat plat and it's material is dark matter with dark energy. there are other universe and each of them are below the other. This flat universe is elastic. So if something is in it, it falls constantly down. It stretches the universe. Here comes the clue: If the objects falls down and sinks into the abyss of universe it also stretches into the other below universe flat plat. And it sinks and sinks for like trillion and more years. And Then it breaks and all the content from universe 1 comprehends into a small drop which contains all essence of the universe with all information and it drips into the next flat universe plat causing the big bang which is not Bang or explosion, it's just this small drop intrudes in a new blank universe plat causing to enhance and activate the universe plat and the information in the small blob (like a tear which falls from you eyes) causing to begin processes which led to almost same creation and developing of past universe. If you ask why? I can explain too. The universe which I think is flat and already a system in itself. It's content is blank because nothing introduded so far. But his material is pure dark energy fields and dark matter which have properties. Properties like a straight system of almost eternity small points of energy fields which wait content to drop into the playing field to activate and work. The universe and is small particles are all connected like you pixels on the screen. Exactly that's how I would describe it. The universe and is particles are like the pixels of your screen. And each pixel is a worker and creator. It only waits for orders and commands. The dark matter and energy is the fuel for all these pixels to work and create all together simultaneously something which you see as objects and atmosphere. And when this drop comes into the next universe it's like sperm giving life and content to a blank clear system. Then everything will arrange in billion or trillion years and will develop with trial and error a perfect system because each pixel is working while each pixel always connects and communicates with each other pixel and all pixel together in the whole universe as an overall super entity pixel. Like I sad I see this for the first time but I always thought that we are sinking and falling. And that's why we think we expand but in reality we only fall constantly down and stretch the universe which is elastic. Causing to stretch many other universe flat plates under our universe to stretch. Think of a elastic something gathered above the same elastic thing. If you put a heavy weight on top all level of the elastic thing will fall stretch down and object will fall. But then there is a limit were the first on top universe rip apart and all content information of this universe will comprehend back into a single drop which will now fall down and enter a new under neath universe causing to give it live with the informations from the old universe how it is gonna have to work and the pixels which activate because they get information and the dark matter fuelling the dark emergy to work and giving them maybe somehow of consciousness because every pixel like I sad is communicating each mili second (in reality it is real life and it can't be described with a number because it's love without a single delay) and each pixel of full knowledge of each other pixel which is trillions of lightyear away and connected to the whole system as a whole. We are falling not expending! And that is why light is always everywhere and for as humans always faster than everything. Because it's everywhere 100% of the universe. It's like the wave in a ocean. If you see the wave as the light, nothing can in this ocean faster than the waves therfore our light. The light in our universe exists from the energy exchange and interactions from all the pixels causing waves which work and the dark energy giving them fuel to work and energyze. That's why it is so fast because it was always everywhere. It's like the ocean contains water and if we humans thought that water=light, we would measure the speed of the water and see that it's faster than anything else when in reality it is not fast its just everywhere before now and after. And what I forgot each pixel knows over time how to work due the information of the past universe and each pixel will give each atom and particle orders how to work and react and how to behave. Like a switch from a DNA which can't turn on our off. Every little pixel in the universe has orders and properties and behaves like he has too. So basically the future is always written when we live in the present. The present is the future and there is no time like we humans invented. It's just we are living life and simultaneously with the universe. And I think if some of pixels get failures and malfunction that's why sometimes we get sick or other accidents happen because some particles failed or got desynchronized and can't connect live without a delay with the other particles in the universe. I don't know what how I do it but sometimes I can see future events to occur like a soccer game where I know that a team will wijj exactly 5:1 or will winn first halt 3:1 or the bar team will win 2:0 and so on or know which persons I will see next in the next day Whig I didn't see in years. and other stuff. Call me autistic and hyper sensitive that might be the case. Some friend in school told me in a game where we should say stuff about others and guess who that is that I am a mysterious guy. I sometimes get answers from someone else or wish something to happen and it happens and in the past I was scared because strange things happened and occurred like I wished or imagined. But i got used to it. A couple of month before I asked this strange power that he has to show me what it is all about and what we have to do as humans and what's our goal. The first 2 nights no answer but than on the third night he answered me in my dream and took my hand and showed me what is all about. In summary if you die you will exist as a conscious of many particles flying around and seeing everything oj earth but you can't interact. You also can't gather knowledge. You only can take everything you gatherer as a human and all your knowledge and education will stay fixed and continue on you new entity beeing which consists of many particles like a invisible cloud connected together. I REPEAT EVERYTHING YOU DO TILL YOUR LIFE WILL the only thing you can't take with you after death. That's what he shower me. The key and goals of human existing is to gather knowledge and if you for the energy of your consciousness, brain and thoughts is not vanished. It will live in the particles which connect and put everything together and you living on and watching. The bad part is her I REPEAT you stay this way. You are physically trapped and mentally trapped. You can't access new knowledge or make new memory's or train you capacity or whatever You stay as an observer which can think but can't do nothing. He showed me that a small exception exists. If you connect to the universe it itself in its whole you can make interactions like doing wind blows so people in a room maybe think there is someone there. I am not crazy I just know that I am right like Einstein was. I was always different kid somehow and I always solve riddles with intuition and always are right. If the teacher ask a difficult question on exams and all 20 in the class room sad B, I sad it's Z-G=P and I was right. I always am Right. It's just I can feel it I can sense it. Pls somebody help to solve this I can't do math that's my problem. It's somehow the universe wants me to only imagine it and not calculating it because something bad would happen because I would use it wrong if feel it. But Mark this in order to get out of the universe when we solve our universe we have to increase the life of humans. Because that's what is limiting us because people can't collect knowledge because everything gets more complicated and more content. The very best needs 40 years to get to the point where They understand Einstein and then are too old with 60 years. We have to increase human life to 150-240 years in order to use the knowledge and capacity of our very best. And by doing so normal people would also have more time to be more educated and maybe then useful because of intrinsic motivation to help us by working for the goal of understanding universe. More people would feel encouraged to learn math and explore the universe.
@The Magician You have to teach yourself what the words mean. A good professor is not responsible of the amount of personal work a student should put in. Nobody understands everything at the first lesson, you have to notate what you didn't get and work it by yourself.
He mentions at the end of some of these videos, like in this one, you'll need to understand certain things before you can really follow what he's saying well. The way the videos are presented appear like these are fun little clips for casual viewers with no background, but they're not. It's more like a couple of experimental discussions courses for physicist majors only available senior year or in grad school but presented in a visually appealing way instead of on a whiteboard / chalkboard.
@The Magician PBSSpaceTime has a different take than other science shows. They don't dumb things down for their layman viewers...their view is...if you can't keep up...that's on you. Agree or disagree, that is their philosophy.
@The Magician if you try to learn about general relativity or quantum mechanics without understanding previous concepts like gravitation, Newton's laws of motion, etc it's your fault and not the teacher's. Everything has a process, you can't just jump to step 13 without learning about everything before that.
But if a black hole is a universe, what happens when a black hole is absorbed by another black hole? Do the universes collide? Do the constants average out?
There is no "when". From the perspective of the black hole, you are disconnected from the normal passage of events, and would not be aware of the other black hole colliding with your black hole
The moment the black holes collide would be the exact moment the event horizon is destroyed due to hawking radiation. You have to consider the infinities present in the math here, as nothing can pass into a black hole from the reference point of the greater universe due to infinite pressure of space-time. The only time the event can "occur" in the outer universe is when the singularity disperses.
Doesn't this theory rely on there being a "mother universe" that came first, and by chance had the perfect parameters to support the creation of black holes, to then launch this cosmological evolutionary tree of natural selection?
steffeeH in the same way the bing bang or evolution describe how events propagated within a context, this theory would describe how constants and other proportions in universes balance without really needing to describe how it all started.
I think this question actually left the scope of physics and entered philosophy, but it's a damn good question, which I unfortunately cannot answer, and I'm guessing no one can :/
not if past and future are infinate. if the future can be infinite than why cant the past. cause and effect are arbitrary. why not effect and cause. reverse entropy. we are biased to cause and effect because human brains only record the past. its arbitrary from our perspective.
The "mother universe" could have been very poor at producing black holes, it would have only needed to produce enough to start the tree going, possibly just one, or it could have been a oscillatory universe that went through a Big Bounce multiple times before having the right parameters to spawn any black holes at all.
And the edge is an event- horizon so we could easily be living inside a black-hole. Really very strange indeed... but I am thinking that every single time it's been even weirder than we thought when we got all gallus, thinking that we'd just about tied the bow at the top, only to find out that the entire picture needed radically changed as new ideas and techniques led to new data about the DYNAMIC UNIVERSE ... every single time one thinks COMPLETION, it equals stasis...equals DEATH! Static points on graphs tend to be terminal, or infinite, i.e. undefined. Avoid them. Life and living is always a dynamic process! Possibly the best word ever is DYNAMIC...or NEW, CHANGE, BEYOND THE HORIZON, PROBE, EXPLORE, AND LET'S GANG UP ON THE GUY WHO CAME UP WITH "CURIOSITY KILLED THE CAT!", because that's where stasis and ignorance and death begin. Thank you. Cactus Club 🌵🌵🍸😋👍❗🌵♣️🍸🌎 Extra dry and extra-large martinis all round! ⚡⚡✨😈👍🍸
A puddle finds himself in a ditch on the side of a road. One day he realizes the hole fits him quite nicely, perfectly, in fact. He says to himself, "My, this hole is perfect! It has that lump over there for me, and even has a crack right there. Why, this must've been made for me!"
Do you know how many fundamentals you are comparing to just a ditch on the road? u should go and read more about the accuracy of the universe's physics
@@mr.maccaman2 I was talking in general, if we'll talk about how ur existence is just a coincidence then sure, the comparison fits perfectly, I mean if we were to assume a complexity factor it'll be nearly the same, they'll both get 10.. for humans tho it'll be 10 to the power 20.. but come on, they still have 10 in common.. no biggie
@@Mel-jf9gx Complexity doesn't matter with what i'm saying though, and could you also cite a source for a 10^20 "complexity factor?" No matter how complex it is the analogy works. If the universe weren't suitable for intelligent life to evolve, then there would be no intelligent life to observe it. If there were no ditch in a road for a puddle to fall into, then there would be no puddle to observe it
@@mr.maccaman2 Sure, complexity doesn't matter, it's all coincidence lol.. the 10*20 factor is just an assumption but it's more than that if you thought about the fact that it's not only about humans but also about the circumstances that could fit humans.. which raises the complexity factor.. but hey it's all coincidence! u know after the internet, lots of ppl picked up some unusual thoughts to prove to themselves that they are special and prove to the society that they are idiots.. gays, atheists, vegans, transgenders and I'm pretty sure there r more but the surface is creep enough so no need for digging in.. but atheists and coincidencers are the funniest.. it's like u r supposed to leave ur brain out when u join and use the word " coincidence " at each argument and also compare simple things to a 10*20 much complex stuff and assume that they're the same, I mean it worked with 1 so it should work with the rest of the numbers.. the funny thing is, while scientist were trying to discover how universe work they came up with general relativity and quantum physics which aren't linked tho based on ur idiocity they should, if it worked for micro then it should work for macro but u know it's not but we'll just ignore this and ignore common sense and also logic while we are at it.. all for seeking attention!
The quantum mechanics of the universe is “fine tuned for life” those who understand QM come to see it is meticulously built like a castle of blocks. Very unlikely to form on its own unless theres an infinite number of chances. Hence the multiverse theory. An intelligent creator is just as likely god is outside of time in an eternal dimension we cannot understand. We simply can’t comprehend it yet. Like a blind person from birth trying to understand color. He can’t imagine it until he receives sight. Or a fish trying to imagine what life outside of water is like, it only knows that watery reality like we understand spacetime as linear. Our universe is incomplete in that it had a beginning, it’s obvious something infinite gave birth to it (space time). I encourage you to seek the truth and live life as with an eternal purpose. Our life very well may be forever recorded in the quantum field of space time. Quantum entangled with the universe, god, and choices of good and evil. There is a place for the righteous and also a place for those who live for selfish desires. The eternal being gave us the gift of eternal existence to share with Him. We just don’t see it yet because we our building ourselves into what we will forever become. Death is the door to finally finding the truth wether I’m right or wrong. Amazingly enough quantum entangled particles need no time to transfer information and act instantaneously, even if they’re separated across the universe! When one is effected the other is also. Everything we know takes time to travel even light. But if God is quantum entangled with us on a molecular level he would be all, in all. And if not in all at least within those who choose to accept his designed spirit. He would be within us and his holy beings(angels) working for him. This would allow him to instantly communicate and understand ourselves, prayers, etc. and also his angels who are currently at war with the dark forces of the devil He allowed to war against Him for the souls of us, the new eternal creatures of earth he has created. The Word says “we will even answer for every careless word spoken” meaning that all we say and do is recorded on some cosmic level and will follow us infinitely. If we live evil then our lives will haunt us in a place of just punishment where will see rightly so that we deserve to be there. Even if it seems unfair right now from our limited understanding on earth. Through death the veil will be lifted and well see what a dimension without time the way we know can truly exist. it’s easy to blame a God for our Original Sin through the first man. God is outside of time and knows the future already. You are predestined from birth through your own free will. Tragically many dig there own grave and god provides the shovel. Who are we to question HIS motives. Sadly you are likely to exist through eternal torment glorifying the creative being in his just punishment for your willful ignorance. You will never be 100% sure what comes next until you die, never. There will always be that 1% of eternal punishment. And that 1% out weighs the 99 the same way infinity outweighs 80 years of life. God gets the last laugh and it’s a laugh that echoes forever in a painful regretful existence, yikes. All I know is you’ve been given the choice and many choose to be a fool. Ultimately fooling themselves through the pride of knowledge and arrogance. P.S. I don’t mean to offend. This comment has been taken from a previous conversation :) I’m sorry maybe I wrote it poorly or you misinterpreted. Predestination and free will can coexist but many Christians struggle to comprehend how this could be possible. I’m not saying God forces people to sin or sends them on a road to damnation. I was saying he lays out before all of us the choices of life and death, right and wrong, good and evil. Even though he knows before we are born what choices we will make doesn’t mean it’s not our fault we make them. You may willfully choose to harden your heart. God knows that you would and ultimately did create you. But he didn’t create you for that purpose. It’s our choice ultimately. We see god as evil to let the world suffer. When we finally die we will see the truth. Also look at the animals we kill for food etc. God is far above us the way we are above them and we kill for sport lol. Not that I’m saying He does. But who are we to ask the greatest quantum mechanic of all “why did you make me like this and let all this bad happen” there humility and faith. Faith is not scientific at all but thought of as foolishness is some circumstance. But God chose what was foolishness to the world to confound the wise. At that time Jesus said, "I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and learned, and revealed them to little children. Humility and faith of a child is laughable to the worlds hardened and stubborn hearts.
@@Bradmhj Entangled particle behaves the way it does if they are unaffected from their initial states. If u try to change properties of one of them they will no more be entangled . Eliminating the free will ( and thus eliminating so called "good" and "bad" people cuz their properties are preset ) So pls stop saying unecessary things and try to use physics concepts to showcase your mindset .
I've always thought this concept feels intuitive and I love it. At the same time this kind of just delays the inevitable question ; if universes are formed by black holes how did the "first universe" and "first black hole" form? I'm pretty sure that's unfalsifiable. If we can somehow discover black holes make new universes don't we have to admit we can never understand our overall existence?
No matter what theory you stick to, there will always remain a question bothering countless human minds - "But what was before that?". The only thing that may satisfy us is an entire casual infinity, with it's events extending infinitely far in both the past and the future. Even then, though, it may turn out to be unfalsifiable. I would prefer the answer of more aesthetical and, perhaps, philosophical nature: "In the beginning, there was nothing... But nothing must always give way to something."
I honestly am starting to believe that the NEED to answer this question is just a flaw of human reasoning. Literally no answer will ever satisfy our minds because there is always a question beyond the question. If GOD was to descend and explain the entire origin of existence.....the next logical question would be "but what about before that" or "but why" and the void of understanding would just repeat. Our thirst for knowledge is insatiable.
The problem is that we are used to thing of everything in terms of TIME. We always ask: what happened before? But what happens if in reality, there was never a before... there is something that has always existed that interacted with timeless existent “somethings” that created time itself and everything else that create somethinng else
Can you say something to me? I want to see what its like when I get a message from someone called New Message with the notification icon as their pic lol.
I have been living with this hypothetical idea of how the universe works for ever now. I look at ecosystems and I see that they recycle energy and find ways to keep a balance. So I can very easily imagine the greater universe ecosystem following in that manner. Black holes are the perfect candidate for a galactic recycler. The other end of a black hole could be a white hole that is a singularity point of unimaginable forces and states of matter that connect a tube between 2 bubbles that represent universes. Then the cycle can continue. Each universe has the ability to recycle energy and matter from itself to feed another universe, creating a ecosystem that is not wasting matter but reusing the matter from old to feed the new. Just like how forest's exist on our planet. It's symbiotic and destructive and creative all at the same time.
You may have fallen into Einstein's trap, "the clockwork universe" where he couldn't imagine it being finite, he wanted it cyclical so it could be neat... it's probably a human inclination.
It's taken me over ten years of watching these sort of videos starting with David Attenborough and Brian Coxs series but finally now with in the past few months I'm starting to enjoy maths videos breaking down physics. I look forward to a deeper understanding.
Also if anyone has any good recommendations of channels to watch which breaks things down mathematically please share. I like DrPhysicsA and Michel van Biezen.
LMFAO! And they get there without drugs! How is it that a lot of education leads people to manufacturer and believe the wildest and craziest things? Like Steve Martin on steroid enhanced hallucinogens.... absolutely none of this can ever be tested, or proven. They give their wildest guesses anyways!
@@mastershake42019 because that is when the idea of this came to my mind and I was wondering if anybody else had the same idea and maybe I was looking up the wrong stuff on the internet but I couldn't find anything similar
Yeah, I'm still waiting for the "I am everything" video, or article, or whatever since 7 years. Studying physics I found about my intuition of static time, there is also a video on this channel, but I'm still waiting for my intuition of the one-identity. Yeah, I know the story "the Egg" which kind of shows this intuition, but it is not well explained, and it's too focused on the mystical rather than the rational.
This only pushes the question back another step: why did the *first* black hole universe have fundamental constants that allow the creation of black holes?
@@daniellittle9015 Very good point. I'm not an expert on black holes, but gravity being strong enough to eventually collapse into a singularity is easier to come across than perfect conditions to create life...
Peter Berry The quantum mechanics of the universe is “fine tuned for life” those who understand QM come to see it is meticulously built like a castle of blocks. Very unlikely to form on its own unless theres an infinite number of chances. Hence the multiverse theory. An intelligent creator is just as likely god is outside of time in an eternal dimension we cannot understand. We simply can’t comprehend it yet. Like a blind person from birth trying to understand color. He can’t imagine it until he receives sight. Or a fish trying to imagine what life outside of water is like, it only knows that watery reality like we understand spacetime as linear. Our universe is incomplete in that it had a beginning, it’s obvious something infinite gave birth to it (space time). I encourage you to seek the truth and live life as with an eternal purpose. Our life very well may be forever recorded in the quantum field of space time. Quantum entangled with the universe, god, and choices of good and evil. There is a place for the righteous and also a place for those who live for selfish desires. The eternal being gave us the gift of eternal existence to share with Him. We just don’t see it yet because we our building ourselves into what we will forever become. Death is the door to finally finding the truth wether I’m right or wrong. it’s easy to blame a God for our original sin through the first man. God is outside of time and knows the future already. You are predestined from birth through your own free will. Tragically many dig there own grave and god provides the shovel. Who are we to question HIS motives. Sadly you are likely to exist through eternal torment glorifying the creative being in his just punishment for your willful ignorance. You will never be 100% sure what comes next until you die, never. There will always be that 1% of eternal punishment. And that 1% out weighs the 99 the same way infinity outweighs 80 years of life. God gets the last laugh and it’s a laugh that echoes forever in a painful regretful existence, yikes. All I know is you’ve been given the choice and many choose to be a fool. Ultimately fooling themselves through the pride of knowledge and arrogance. P.S. I don’t mean to offend. This comment has been taken from a previous conversation :)
AIFAHRA HORGGHRO just because we can’t understand something doesn’t mean it’s not possible. We don’t understand many parts of quantum mechanics but we create theories. There’s just as much chance for intelligent design as there is for infinite universes. Faith isn’t scientific but scientist have faith in their theories.
So, does each daughter universe have less energy than the last, or does each scale to effectively set the energy to infinity? And what happens to matter added to an already existing black hole? Does it also add to the original energy content?
Universes don't necessarily have a lot of energy. The energy of ours is pretty close to zero. What new Universes (or at least ours) have is Low Entropy.
Because time stops at the singularity, there is no existing black hole the matter would be added to. It all arives at the black hole exactly at the moment the singularity Forms.
Maybe the big bang of a universe is happening when a black hole evaporates to death by hawking radiation and explodes. That's when no more matter can be added.(?) For the rest of the questions, I have no speculations^^, sorry
I also ask my self this question. It seems so plausble too me, but we'll never know if the way we perceive the universe is just too narrow and things work totally different on a big scale just like in the quantum world.
There is a bit of a serious jump between those two concepts, but no, black holes will always be a sphere whatever number of dimensions they have, so couldn't really form such a structure. The fabric of spacetime itself though, you might be able to fold that up into some reality warping bs to hurt your brain with :)
@Geoffrey Harris Ay, but the surface is still spherical no matter how warped the volume is radially. Although now that I think about it rotation is assumed to stretch it, at least for external observers.
I think entropy just uses the most efficient way to unfold in space and that way is in fractals. Same thing over and over again just always a little bit different. That's the way we expirience time and also that's the key to life and evolution. The same think repeated over and over again would have no time but entropy forces things to a lower energy potential and so it's always evolving in the most efficient way.
@@TheArunster The idea of increasing entropy driving time has always interested me, but there isn't any metaphysical reason that a system couldn't evolve without changing entropy, even though you can't do that in our universe I don't think changing entropy is required for time to flow (although maybe if we find a planet sized blob of bose-einstein condensate we might find that time passes slower near it), but it may still set the direction of time (I think a spacetime video even covered that). Not sure of the connection to fractals though, I get it in a DMT-trip sense, but what would it mean for space to have a fractal structure? Fractals don't change without changing their parameters so do you imagine the parameters of the fractal change over time due to some force?
One day we learn that everyone everywhere looks at one another thinking the exact same thing. Eventually one realizes we all deal with things beyond our comprehension; it just changes from person to person where the incomprenshion lies. When realizing the so called "experts" are ourselves, we finally complete our assimilation into adulthood, we decide to transcend our own difficulties and dilemmas whenever possible to help others find their way in this cosmic soup we call life! Keep swimming!
Honey remember that this is not beyond your comprehension. It is only beyond the level of knowledge you have currently attained. Seek more, learn more, and you will find that these concepts actually aren’t that difficult to understand. There’s just a ton of information that you need to have in order to fully grasp the concepts. You’re here on the channel already. Use the internet as a tool to study this info and you won’t feel nearly as lost this time next year 😊
@@keandreaanderson3650 That's not really fair.....maybe they were not saying that as a "I can't get it" so much as "I am glad I don't have to comprehend everything here to get something from this channel".
Are the constants really "fine tuned"? I agree that if you changed them just slightly you wouldn't have atoms or chemistry, but do we know for certain that you would have *nothing* at all? It stands to reason that some sort of complex structure would come out from almost any arrangement of the constants, the rules of the game (fundamental forces and particles) are still there even if you shake them up some. The electromagnetic force would still bring electrons and protons (or whatever quarks form) together, even if they don't form into an atom they'd become something, and that something could bring forth life. If you give a kid a set of lego he builds a robot, give the same set to another one and he builds a spaceship.
@@luc1pop Something along the lines of complex structures with the ability of self-replication, ingestion, excretion, among others. A biologist could make a more precise list but reproduction is the key one.
@@luc1pop That's a VERY big if. But no, then I'd say the Universe itself is alive and black holes are analogous to reproductive organs, because black holes wouldn't be creating just black holes.
"electromagnetic force" think on this path. Think magmatism... How are magnetic fields created? How pervasive are they throughout our universe? These are questions we have answers too, yet not applying these answers to old outdated theories.
honestly this i have been thinking for sooooo long! but the thing that makes me doubt is the energy, feels like it would have to little to create something so huge?
Yes but there is so much excess energy. Taking into consideration the multitudes of invisible and or negative energies. It could be just transforming this invisible/negative energy into a visible/positive energy. In this sense energy is still not destroyed nor created but transferred.
I'd think huge is relevant. Were huge to an ant. A skyscraper is huge to us. These new universes may only have a fraction of the energy of the mother universe, but to us it would still seem like a huge amount, because we dont have a reference point.
I been thinking about the energy for so many years, because it is the biggest question. Where does the energy comes from to be able to create universe. But if universe need energy from somewhere means energy is eternity. but that doesn't feel right. So I thinking the totally energy in universe is zero. Means universe can exist without energy. Like +10-10=0, but the difference is 20. So all process in universe is a process to reach zero stage. Universe exists because of unstable energy stage. When all stars die and black hole fade away is maybe reach energy level zero
"Error can lead the way to truth, while empty-headeness only leads to more empty-headedness, or to a career in politics." -Master Li, "Bridge of Birds" by Barry Hughart.
DeadKingIsDead The quantum mechanics of the universe is “fine tuned for life” those who understand QM come to see it is meticulously built like a castle of blocks. Very unlikely to form on its own unless theres an infinite number of chances. Hence the multiverse theory. An intelligent creator is just as likely god is outside of time in an eternal dimension we cannot understand. We simply can’t comprehend it yet. Like a blind person from birth trying to understand color. He can’t imagine it until he receives sight. Or a fish trying to imagine what life outside of water is like, it only knows that watery reality like we understand spacetime as linear. Our universe is incomplete in that it had a beginning, it’s obvious something infinite gave birth to it (space time). I encourage you to seek the truth and live life as with an eternal purpose. Our life very well may be forever recorded in the quantum field of space time. Quantum entangled with the universe, god, and choices of good and evil. There is a place for the righteous and also a place for those who live for selfish desires. The eternal being gave us the gift of eternal existence to share with Him. We just don’t see it yet because we our building ourselves into what we will forever become. Death is the door to finally finding the truth wether I’m right or wrong. it’s easy to blame a God for our original sin through the first man. God is outside of time and knows the future already. You are predestined from birth through your own free will. Tragically many dig there own grave and god provides the shovel. Who are we to question HIS motives. Sadly you are likely to exist through eternal torment glorifying the creative being in his just punishment for your willful ignorance. You will never be 100% sure what comes next until you die, never. There will always be that 1% of eternal punishment. And that 1% out weighs the 99 the same way infinity outweighs 80 years of life. We’ll see who gets the last laugh. All I know is you’ve been given the choice and many choose to be a fool. Ultimately fooling themselves through the pride of knowledge and arrogance.
u'FO 🌈 OF'u parT 🌈 Trap exAMEN🌈FIRM'amen'T, waterFALLS. seaLEvEL Dr.🌏ip 👀☔ Go fish ¿ 🐟 Psalm 19:1 The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork.
Wouldnt daughter universes contain less matter, meaning eventually the iteration ends when there is not enough matter for even a single black hole within the daughters? Also would the highest tier parent of said chain of black holes have so much mass that it would eventually (or even quickly) form one single black hole aka a big crunch?
interesting question. i can imagine it as the movement of the metamers of a caterpilar. The top tier parent disappears and the last child becomes a mommy. So there would be an infinate gradient of matter, since we asume that black holes constantly absorb matter creating new universes.
Although I'm absolutely the wrong person to ask stuff like this, after a couple dozen of episodes here I'm confident to say, that the amount of matter 'before' the big bang doesn't... well matter.
@@Tfin you're forgetting about anti-matter. The amount of matter in our universe isn't a result of how much matter came into existence at the big bang, rather it is leftover from a yet unknown asymmetry between matter and anti-matter during the big bang. Which, matter/anti-matter pairs are net zero energy. Ergo, the smallest black hole could lead towards the biggest universe and it just comes down to the physics constants created.
The concept makes sense. If you change your frame of reference on a Penrose diagram in becomes clear. The closer you are to the event horizon the more the universe appears to contract into a singularity. While on the opposite, the closer you are to the singularity the more the universe appears to be expanding.
I understand that if you reverse time, a black hole looks like our best guess at the big bang. But the idea that the mass in a black hole exits into another universe raises some questions. If for example, that material expands into a different space time, does the black hole lose that mass in this universe? Or is the entire newly created universe still 'on the books' in this one inside the black hole?
This means that the CMB is actually the event horizon of a massive black hole that houses our universe. Instead of the universe expanding, it is only an illusion while matter is shrinking.
My guess is because time is distorted infinitely inside the event horizon, nothing that happens outside of the event horizon can have any effect on the daughter universe. Because the point of formation of the black hole is stretched infinitely by its gravity. Therefore, even when the black hole evaporates, the daughter universe will still be fine. Sorry if this doesn't make sense. I'm Tired.
@@bookend2002 it's still quite weird. When you observe the black hole you say "hey cool there's another universe in there I wonder what kind of series they're looking at". Then the black hole evaporates to a size smaller then a Planck length thus becoming essentially non existent in our universe and your still expected to say "hey there's a universe there, yeah I know you aren't seeing anything and no i am not delusional it's right there"
Ryan D'Amico so you mean that after blackhole creates a universe, the universe becomes disconnected from parent blackhole and universe and lives it’s own life independently, unaware of parent’s universe existence?
All of which has no meaning other than the tri) of how objects move and behave. Space time does nothing to explain an eternal and infinite universe. That is what should be self explanatory.
There are a lot of tabboo topics that are much closer to your everyday life that might get you socially crucified for attempting to bring them up. Like biological diversity of humans.
Universes passing on their traits thru black hole “embryos “ leading to evolution by natural selection? I think this hypothesis should be called “the Anthropomorphic Principle” :P
Crazy theory: What if universes favor intelligent life because it eventually creates singularities. If science ever manages to create a singularity a new universe would be formed by that. What if our universe is at the perfect balance between supporting life and supporting natural black holes?
Very smart call. I had similar thought, when thinking about anti-creationist argument against “too random” arguments. If such universe-life-universe natural selection is the case - then life isn’t accidental - it is inevitable. (Those 2 things may be synonymous sometimes tbh).
Our universe is a white hole inside a black hole. The black hole is centered at infinity in every direction. The CMB is it Hawking radiation. The edge of the observable universe is its event horizon. The expansion of the universe is the effect of its gravitation.
Joseph K my theory is these black holes collapse into a single mother universe of eternal time. This universe had a beginning. The other does not and intelligently created ours. Our individual being has been created and will exist eternally, the same way time had a beginning but will go on eternally.
My biggest pro argument for the fact our universe has smth to do with black holes / White holes is that everything inside this universe is build up fractal (principle of self-similarity) and i dont know any reason why this should stop by the universe itself.
As child-verses only are a fraction of their parents, does this mean that the mass of new universes decreases exponentially with the number of generations?
This is insane! I know this math and there is absolutely NO REAL SCIENCE here. No real physics, just people postulating. This research is pointless because there are no black holes. There is electro dynamics and angular momentum, that's it. Gravity is not its own force, there is just charge and attraction and the order of everything in this universe is set up from sub-atomic to universal scale by electrical current and associated magnetism. This math requires no arbitrarily set speed of light, no bs constants, no equation adjustments and it also makes actual, logical sense. When you do a physics equation ladies and gentlemen, and you come away with an answer of -0 or infinity, you have f'd up the math.
Here’s my dumb theory: The universe began with the formation of a black hole and that it is this black holes’ gravitational effect which is the reason behind the stretching of space time that we observe in our universe is occurring at an accelerating pace. You may ask, why is our space time then accelerating in its expansion and not just expanding at a decreasing rate since we know that black holes shrink over time via Hawking radiation? My response would be to bring up the effect that gravity wells as extreme as a black hole have significant effects on time in accordance to Einstein’s General Relativity. I therefore propose that the black hole that started this universe created the Big Bang. Both the effect that the gravity of black holes have in the expansion of space as well as acceleration in its expansion which can be explained by being due to the matter continuously being consumed by the black hole as a relatively steady rate. If surveyed from outside of the black hole, this consumption would occcur on the nanosecond scale timeframe. However, our perspective from inside this extreme of a gravitational well that has effectively stretched our space time flat, implies that this increase in mass of the black hole is a rather slow process which has continued over the course of our universe’ existence. This makes sense as black holes do not necessarily stretch space time to infinity. Instead they stretch it to the extremes of reality in which our modern mathematical models break down. However, we know that over time, these black holes are shrinking implying that the gravity well is not truly infinite but must be equal to the mass needed to generated the Hawking radiation required of a black hole to fully evaporate. While we have observed only small fractions of this occurring in our universe, the mathematics surrounding their predicted existence and behaviors is well supported by numerous simulations. Perhaps this stretching is directly responsible for seemingly near perfect stretching of our universes’ space time. With exception of the specs of matter (which we attribute to the matter of our universe) affect it. Perhaps we could measure the rates at which the universe has been expanding as use it and the estimated age of the universe to backtrack the history of space time and potentially measure the mass needed to make the black hole that made us.
Some days I get so excited about how much humans know but then I realize that we don’t really know anything. It makes me want to jump forward a thousand years in the future.
The thing about science is: The more you learn, the more questions you have. In a thousand years I believe we will merely have a better understanding of how little we understand, albeit with unimaginably advanced technology to help us investigate those questions.
@@Shiznoz222 I like to think of mankind's accumulation of knowledge as expanding concentric rings: the larger the ring, the more darkness touches the outer edge.
I have never had the proper training because I am dyslexic ... But I understand more that I should with the schooling I have had. Thank you for this series
You ain't had much schooling. The fact of the matter is, even with schooling you can only believe half of what you here unless you are talking strictly Mathematics. This video is children's science because of mankind's stubbornness to think a knew about what makes up a universe.
So, it's nice to know that in 100 Trillion years, when our Universe ends, there will other Universe's in other dimensions, so there is truly never an end to the Universe.
Absolutely fascinating. As ever, brilliantly formulated and delivered. Great presenter - this is how a lecturer can keep an audience’s attention, deliver information in a comprehensible way and inspire. Thanks as well to the amazing team behind the scenes. I’m hooked!
Hi Matt! Thanks, I've been waiting for this one. I have pondered this subject for a long time myself. I do have a question. How does time factor in? Does the new universe come into existence as the black hole forms, or after it has accumulated a certain amount of mass, exceeding a limit?
If other universes may have different values on the "dials" of the fundamental constants, is it also possible that some universes may have more or less fundamental constant dials than others?
Isn't it just amazing how all of these discussions start with -- it might be possible, some people think, we believe, the math suggests...... and before you know it, a few paragraphs later, entire civilizations are built upon an established foundation so generously laid out for you in a few prior paragraphs! LOL!
@@oldchannel_MoM it's the truth. We don't know. That is a simple fact. Acknowledging that you don't know something is the first necessary step in order to learn something. Those that claim to know that which isn't or can't be known are the biggest and loudest of fools.
@@placeholder2617 ik that's true, I'm simply implying that's it's the "easiest" answer and not the "best." But we continue learning to be enlightened more. It's like lifting weights, a newbie just starting doesn't know his 'pr' yet, but around a month, he gets his pr, but keeps getting more in months to come. I don't disagree on both of your statements.
Here's the thing that I've always wondered about this theory: what if life is itself a mechanism for creating universes? That is, having reached a certain level of sophistication, might living things fine tune black holes or something similar to produce new universes as similar as possible to its own, giving the coding of its own universe an evolutionary advantage? This would favour a model in which life was likely but not _too_ likely (reducing the risk of premature destruction due to conflict).
I’ve always liked to imagine what it would look like to be at the center of a singularity.Because the event horizon would be inescapable,it would probably seem as if all sides in every direction would be moving away from you,similar to expansion,and the center would probably be at any and every point because of its expansion.
I imagine it's either a crystal (nothing is moving/energetic) or it's the opposite and everything is just energy, making it a very brightly glowing soup.
I hope to see the day you will write a book describing black holes in the same way you explain them in your videos. It would be the holy bible on this topic, and probably as huge as it, but damn man I would read it even during my job! Take this suggestion seriously, I'm pretty sure many of us followers would be happy to see that day coming
Far throw: So if black holes form a new universe and the data is encoded on the event horizon, could this explain the expansion of the universe? Our parent universe is then just starting to gobble up a sun in in our black hole, increasing how much it eats and thus increasing the area of the event horizon, expanding our universe in all places.
@@pappoochacha well, just the description and interaction of all that mass. I see it as a giant computer program that the black hole executes. The mass we experience and see, every particle is described using particles in our parent black hole, just like bits on a computer store information. We can have billion lines of text that, when executed, can simulate a mini digital world and still store it on a thumb drive or even a micro SD. Imagine what a black hole could store and execute using all the particles it sucks up. I think that's how the simulation hypothesis works; essentially, our universe would be encoded and executed in 2d (instead of our 1d computer programs) on the 'surface' of the black hole.
Don't forget about space-time, folks. Mass may not mean shit in comparison to whatever comes out the other end. Just look at our universe...if you roll it backwards it behaves just like a black hole and it's event horizon. If you roll time forward, it's exactly the opposite of a black hole. This theory needs to be explored more thoroughly. This is the one that seems the most plausible to me. It all just makes sense.
The total energy of a closed system is close to zero in a flat universe like ours. So it would contain mass and energy of the space which negates each other making it close to zero. This is how they propose out universe just popped into existence out of nothing.
I have wondered this very thing for many years and until they prove it wrong I subscribe to the idea. It would make sense that eventually the pressure and heat would cause a singularity that could subsequently go bang. Maybe physics are only constant in our individual universe.
It may be because you are a genius! Remember that those who has thought of it before and "better" then you, is the one who can just reflect there thought with other who works with it every day and have the newest knowledge! I am, just for fun, in these days, thinking what if Einstein were wrong in talking about Space-time, what would happen if we instead talked about Gravitational time? :-)
@@mcfreezyyaboi8389 Oh wow a lot but, if we are talking about space-time, time has no reason for not moving both ways, while gravitational time do only move in one direction like gravity is only a "one way street". You can think of gravitational time as gravity on the X axis and Time on Y. Higher gravity = slower time but never negative.
God people need to stop saying they had the same idea when they clearly didn't. We all got stoned and wondered if black holes lead to a new world one time or another. This is not that.
Basic problem I see with this: these sound like countably infinite sets, and applying statistics to infinite sets of the same cardinality generates wonky results (i.e., there are as many even numbers as whole numbers, and as many numbers divisible by 472,361 as divisible by 3).
No question, infinite sets behave differently than finite sets- not just differently, but bizarrely. But that's about all this amounts to: they aren't genuinely self-contradictory, merely counter-intuitive or "wonky". And given that our first-hand experience is entirely with sets of finite cardinality, infinite sets naturally would work counter to our experience and intuitions (in other words, "wonky" is precisely how we ought to EXPECT them to work). So this isn't a particularly strong objection.
Math is funny. In a book called "The Final Theory" (boy do I hate plugging in this book) it is mathematically proven that gravity does not exist, that the entire universe is expanding, in our case, expanding at 1 G acceleration. I guess, since acceleration is measured in Gs, the math works both ways. So, mathematically proving that gravity does not exist. Like I said, math is funny.
@@enaidealukal9203 What I meant was describing something as 'more' or 'less' likely when dealing with sets of the same infinite cardinality seems to be functionally meaningless. It is entirely possible I simply don't understand how statistical probability interacts with infinite sets.
@@whatsinadeadname yeah I know there are treatments for probability when dealing with infinite sets or infinite sample space, but I'm not familiar with how they actually work, or how controversial or effective they might be. My point is only that wonky or counter-intuitive results when dealing with infinite quantities may well be "a feature and not a bug" here, and so I'd hesitate to regard it as a fatal flaw on that basis alone without knowing more about the specifics
Countably infinite sets can be handled just fine. If we partition the set X into finite subsets Xi parametrized by natural numbers, the relevant question is to ask "in the limit when n approaches infinity, what portion of elements in all the sets Xi with i
The gravity of the walls of the Black Hole that we are inside of pulls our Universe from every direction and this is the Dark Energy runaway expansion we observe.
Random youtuber here... I think I figured out what dark energy and gravity is. OK, our universe is the "other side" of a black hole - in other words, a white hole. The matter (and space) falling into the black hole on the 'other side' is what is inflating our universe... So the reason our universe is accelerating in its expansion is additional matter and space-time appearing from the other side - explaining dark energy. Gravity is due to mass having inertia, resisting the accelerating expansion of our universe in a higher dimension. And the faster than expected rotation of the edges of a galaxy may be due to galaxies acting more like a single object, and the gravity well near the edges being "steeper" than expected. And/or, the "virtual" particles that pop up here near Earth, are much more rare outside of galaxies, so, in effect, act like dark matter.
Before I ever knew this was a hypothesis posed by scientists, I had posed it myself. It just makes sense; black holes gather mass, but we don't know what happens afterward. Surely, they reach critical mass and push all that matter into another universe.
Well their gravity persists in our universe. They only grow, most of them slowly. If they disappeared randomly, I would also think that the mass was „pushed“ into a new universe.
The problem that brings up for me is that we do have a strong idea of what happens afterward: the black hole evaporates, losing mass (into our universe!), through Hawking radiation. This shrinks the event horizon, and the black evaporates even more rapidly. Assuming, I suppose, a lonely black hole with no additional mass nearby to sustain it. Also, despite how much mass is contained inside of even the largest black hole, it still contains only a tiny, tiny fraction of our universe's total mass. If the new universe created has similar constants to our own, then it is going to be a very low mass universe it seems. This process only has to repeat a few times before (as far as I can tell, I'm no physicist) we no longer have enough mass and energy to make new black holes in the baby universes.
This black hole door to the universes is so reminiscent of C.S. Lewis' novel, The Magician's Nephew. There, the main character was in an interim world where the other worlds were linked by pools of water - each leading to their own universe. Way cool!
I am 29 years old and began to have interest in physics and I feel unhappy because I do law and maybe physics is my destiny. But I am still so bad at math that I can't read symbols on equations like they are distracting me and confuse me. Yes i managed somehow through school but only by imagination and making it feel right or just practicing but always each step learned why I do that. But now I can't solve equations and how could I do physics and leave law at almost 30 years old. Why Am I telling you this? Because I was always a kid with lots of imagination. And what I saw now what Einstein found out I had exactly this in my mind why objects move through space around other objects. I even had this imagination that objects fall down with elasticity to break trough the "atmosphere" of space what I think is dark matter over all. My English is not native but I will try to explain. The universe is flat plat and it's material is dark matter with dark energy. there are other universe and each of them are below the other. This flat universe is elastic. So if something is in it, it falls constantly down. It stretches the universe. Here comes the clue: If the objects falls down and sinks into the abyss of universe it also stretches into the other below universe flat plat. And it sinks and sinks for like trillion and more years. And Then it breaks and all the content from universe 1 comprehends into a small drop which contains all essence of the universe with all information and it drips into the next flat universe plat causing the big bang which is not Bang or explosion, it's just this small drop intrudes in a new blank universe plat causing to enhance and activate the universe plat and the information in the small blob (like a tear which falls from you eyes) causing to begin processes which led to almost same creation and developing of past universe. If you ask why? I can explain too. The universe which I think is flat and already a system in itself. It's content is blank because nothing introduded so far. But his material is pure dark energy fields and dark matter which have properties. Properties like a straight system of almost eternity small points of energy fields which wait content to drop into the playing field to activate and work. The universe and is small particles are all connected like you pixels on the screen. Exactly that's how I would describe it. The universe and is particles are like the pixels of your screen. And each pixel is a worker and creator. It only waits for orders and commands. The dark matter and energy is the fuel for all these pixels to work and create all together simultaneously something which you see as objects and atmosphere. And when this drop comes into the next universe it's like sperm giving life and content to a blank clear system. Then everything will arrange in billion or trillion years and will develop with trial and error a perfect system because each pixel is working while each pixel always connects and communicates with each other pixel and all pixel together in the whole universe as an overall super entity pixel. Like I sad I see this for the first time but I always thought that we are sinking and falling. And that's why we think we expand but in reality we only fall constantly down and stretch the universe which is elastic. Causing to stretch many other universe flat plates under our universe to stretch. Think of a elastic something gathered above the same elastic thing. If you put a heavy weight on top all level of the elastic thing will fall stretch down and object will fall. But then there is a limit were the first on top universe rip apart and all content information of this universe will comprehend back into a single drop which will now fall down and enter a new under neath universe causing to give it live with the informations from the old universe how it is gonna have to work and the pixels which activate because they get information and the dark matter fuelling the dark emergy to work and giving them maybe somehow of consciousness because every pixel like I sad is communicating each mili second (in reality it is real life and it can't be described with a number because it's love without a single delay) and each pixel of full knowledge of each other pixel which is trillions of lightyear away and connected to the whole system as a whole. We are falling not expending! And that is why light is always everywhere and for as humans always faster than everything. Because it's everywhere 100% of the universe. It's like the wave in a ocean. If you see the wave as the light, nothing can in this ocean faster than the waves therfore our light. The light in our universe exists from the energy exchange and interactions from all the pixels causing waves which work and the dark energy giving them fuel to work and energyze. That's why it is so fast because it was always everywhere. It's like the ocean contains water and if we humans thought that water=light, we would measure the speed of the water and see that it's faster than anything else when in reality it is not fast its just everywhere before now and after. And what I forgot each pixel knows over time how to work due the information of the past universe and each pixel will give each atom and particle orders how to work and react and how to behave. Like a switch from a DNA which can't turn on our off. Every little pixel in the universe has orders and properties and behaves like he has too. So basically the future is always written when we live in the present. The present is the future and there is no time like we humans invented. It's just we are living life and simultaneously with the universe. And I think if some of pixels get failures and malfunction that's why sometimes we get sick or other accidents happen because some particles failed or got desynchronized and can't connect live without a delay with the other particles in the universe. I don't know what how I do it but sometimes I can see future events to occur like a soccer game where I know that a team will wijj exactly 5:1 or will winn first halt 3:1 or the bar team will win 2:0 and so on or know which persons I will see next in the next day Whig I didn't see in years. and other stuff. Call me autistic and hyper sensitive that might be the case. Some friend in school told me in a game where we should say stuff about others and guess who that is that I am a mysterious guy. I sometimes get answers from someone else or wish something to happen and it happens and in the past I was scared because strange things happened and occurred like I wished or imagined. But i got used to it. A couple of month before I asked this strange power that he has to show me what it is all about and what we have to do as humans and what's our goal. The first 2 nights no answer but than on the third night he answered me in my dream and took my hand and showed me what is all about. In summary if you die you will exist as a conscious of many particles flying around and seeing everything oj earth but you can't interact. You also can't gather knowledge. You only can take everything you gatherer as a human and all your knowledge and education will stay fixed and continue on you new entity beeing which consists of many particles like a invisible cloud connected together. I REPEAT EVERYTHING YOU DO TILL YOUR LIFE WILL the only thing you can't take with you after death. That's what he shower me. The key and goals of human existing is to gather knowledge and if you for the energy of your consciousness, brain and thoughts is not vanished. It will live in the particles which connect and put everything together and you living on and watching. The bad part is her I REPEAT you stay this way. You are physically trapped and mentally trapped. You can't access new knowledge or make new memory's or train you capacity or whatever You stay as an observer which can think but can't do nothing. He showed me that a small exception exists. If you connect to the universe it itself in its whole you can make interactions like doing wind blows so people in a room maybe think there is someone there. I am not crazy I just know that I am right like Einstein was. I was always different kid somehow and I always solve riddles with intuition and always are right. If the teacher ask a difficult question on exams and all 20 in the class room sad B, I sad it's Z-G=P and I was right. I always am Right. It's just I can feel it I can sense it. Pls somebody help to solve this I can't do math that's my problem. It's somehow the universe wants me to only imagine it and not calculating it because something bad would happen because I would use it wrong if feel it. But Mark this in order to get out of the universe when we solve our universe we have to increase the life of humans. Because that's what is limiting us because people can't collect knowledge because everything gets more complicated and more content. The very best needs 40 years to get to the point where They understand Einstein and then are too old with 60 years. We have to increase human life to 150-240 years in order to use the knowledge and capacity of our very best. And by doing so normal people would also have more time to be more educated and maybe then useful because of intrinsic motivation to help us by working for the goal of understanding universe. More people would feel encouraged to learn math and explore the universe.
I just don't get why we're assuming that the laws of our universe can be anything other than what they are. What if a universe can only form with laws like ours? What if our universe if the only one?
Me neither: until we get a sample from some other universe, we should consider that there are probably very good intrinsical reasons for the mass of the electron, etc. being which they are, that we don't know why is because our science is still half-assed.
We're assuming this because this is the scenario we are playing out BASED on those assumptions. If you don't assume that, you have to throw this idea out and well go assume something else which is a completely different theory for a completely different video. And on that videos comments another guy will ask why is there this assumption, as if this was the ONE and ONLY theory which HAS to be true. ALL of these theories are just speculations base upon some assumptions. And one of the scenarios that could be true if we assume laws of the universes can change is this. Just 1 out of infinite possibilities.
Why didn't black holes spontaneously form at the first time-steps ("planck" time) and immediately fill all the universe,as it was expanding? Are they not able to be formed under any mass/energy circumstance? Even if the inflation of the space itself was faster than the rate of black-hole-ification(so it got big before black holes could "eat" the whole universe), in the early universe where everything was really close, should result in black holes with big % of the entire universe's mass.
A big bang event would relate to the affect of a large volume of mass would have on space. It is not like a bang where we came from one spot, but more like all observable existence shows evidence of our space having been propelled all simultaneously in a similar manner at some point, and even at our current visible scale, large clumps of mass can stretch space faster than light can travel across it. Imagine a mass so large it pulls on space so hard that it causes the space of a universe to stretch to it's limits. I imagine this is why our universe is expanding. There could likely be a mass so great that is pulling our visible area of space and of course much much more beyond that as well. This would explain why the universe is spreading faster and faster, as the space gets more and more stretched by this growing festering unfathomable mass which has created this crevasse of space where we reside, of which we can only observe very little in relation to the scale of things. Relativity allows us to see all the other matter near us as rather stationary due to moving at similar speeds. The mass in our area of space is not the driving force of the expansion of the observable universe, and must exist in a goldilocks zone of sorts, to be far enough away from the driving force in space and time to experience the universe with relatively temperate local cosmic activity (in comparison). Black holes are all over as mass attracts mass. The distortion of Space appears to be somewhat limitless, or at least can stretch faster than the speed of light. It may be that once the mass becomes so great it beats the limit of space, punching a hole through it, ejecting particles violently into nothingness, only to some time eventually have them all gather again due to the inherent properties of mass attracting mass. One could argue that all of our visible matter is only here because it was on it's way to that local extreme limit gathering of mass, pulling all of us fatefully back into the cycle.
The universe being "tuned" for life seems a bit of a silly claim when we only have literally one example of life in our universe and know of countless ways for life to get wiped out both on a planetary scale, as well as a galactic scale.
and we mostly assume that everything "has" to be a carbon based life form which is the most likely but with my uneducated ass I dare to say life does not have to be carbon based, i mean who knows what could be out there
@@Ragnarok-us3tk we don't know, but we do know most of what would kill carbon based life would also kill other kinds as well. Carbon based life has the advantage of being basically comprised of the most abundant types of mater in the universe. It's certainly possible for example to have silicon/electric based life, but is it possible for it to evolve naturally? And if it is, it's almost certainly considerably more rare than carbon based. That's just speculation though of course, but the claim that some make that the universe is "fine tuned for life" is genuinely insane, regardless of anything else. If anything the universe is fine tuned to produce near endless nothingness, and with cosmic expansion, at an ever increasing rate. We exist, and life has existed here for quite awhile, so we think we are special, but doom is ever right around the corner. It's entirely possible that the universe as a whole is unstable enough that it winds up wiping out all life eventually, even if that life becomes extraordinarily technologically sophisticated.
@jimmy Burnett Not sure what any of that has to do with this thread. You're right though, life is no accident, it's the inevitable result of the conditions that exist here, and likely elsewhere as well. The question is how rare are those conditions. However the idea that the universe is tuned for life is fairly obviously false in the extreme, it's akin to claiming oceans are fine tuned for land.
Why is the universe smarter than us? I mean we got science!! why cant we just create life from another element? surely 13 billion years of chance cant be smarter than us right?
@@alikhan8014 The universe is not intelligent, not even in some philosophical way. The distances involved, expansion, and the limits on speed of information propagation among other things, ensure that's that case. I think the heart of the second question is "life is so complex that extraordinary intelligence must be required to build it" but that's probably not the right way to look at it. Multi-cellular life, I think is better thought of as a "city" of single celled life working together to maintain their ecosystem, reproduction perpetuating the process. Birth is the continuation of life, not the start of it. Your body is interdependent on all of the life within you as well, all of which are quite fragile and have a shelf life, so even if we could build some cells from scratch, building a whole life form, in place, in time for it to function, may actually be physically impossible. Now of course we have created new life from existing life, we have reprogrammed bacteria to do a variety of things, we have made glowing fish, and all sorts of other things. There have been some interesting abiogenesis experiments done with varying degrees of success but part of the problem is that we don't really know what we are looking for. We have had success with certain aspects of abiogenesis, but the actual process probably played out over geological timescales. Now, on the flipside though is the fact that we are building things that cannot be built in the natural world all the time, because we are "smarter". Without entities like ourselves the universe doesn't build computers, buildings, cars, and so on. I think you give both the universe and humans a bit too much credit though, it took roughly 3.5 billion years for single celled life on this planet to evolve into multi-cellular life. On the same token humans just aren't that smart. From a genetic perspective we are only incrementally more intelligent than other great apes, it just so happens that it's enough for us to do many things they cannot, so it appears like a bigger difference than it is. Pretty soon though we will know enough to start directly improving ourselves. My guess is that if you ask a human a few hundred years from now if they would consider us sentient, the answer would be no. We may look to them far lesser than even apes look to us today.
But it kind of is lol. Stars originate from nebulas and planets form due to the attractive force of gravity. Stars die out and explosions or implosions occur and the aftermath are neutron stars or black holes. Black Holes essentially form the basis for the next generation of galaxies. Hence why I believe on the cosmological scale, some galaxies and stars are said to have existed prior to others.
Have you seen pics of galactic filaments? The galaxies are connected by filaments and the intersection points of the filaments have quasars. It looks brain neurons.
Finally. I thought about this back when I was a student at university in the 90s. I just haven't came across anyone else that had thought about anything similar. Great to see and seriously happy. Thanks for the video:)
Your comment on speculative ideas help us explore the vast space of possible realities, sounds like exactly what artists do. Humans seem to love hypothetical universes.
A human saying that the universe is set for life is like a puddle saying that the hole was made for it because it fits perfectly in the hole. Such a human centric view
All creatures and"life" are just chimical meatbags, nothing special. We are the reflection of the natural procceses which bore our own universe. And so our universe will bare its own children in the form of black holes.
“We know that the fantastic complexity of life is an inevitable outcome of evolution.” I thought evolution was supposed to be the result of random, blind chance. If evolution is somehow “inevitable,” that doesn’t sound very random at all.
You're assigning something to the word inevitable that isn't there. If I roll a marble on a table and nothing stops it. It is inevitable it rolls off the table. If a child stops studying it is inevitable he'll fail his test. If you have reproductive generations splitting gametes between their Gene's to compete those of their offspring. It is inevitable the next generation will differ from the last. Where did you get hung up?
Mutation is somewhat random. Evolution isn't. Articial selection can turn a wolf into a chihuahua. Natural selection can do the same thing. Neither of these is random. Is everyone flunking out of high school these days or is everyone being home schooled by morons? A married couple has two kids. One is smart and attractive. The other is dumb and has a 3rd arm growing out of their forehead. Guess which one has a better chance of reproducing. That isn't random.
@@similaritiesendhere It's the public schools where most of the morons are being created, because most of the people get their education there. Remember, when you get a free education, you get what you pay for. Anyone can get a bad education be it from public school, private school or homeschool. In my experience, some of the most ignorant kids I've seen turned out of the education system have come from two places: state universities and Montessori schools. But there are also very knowledgeable people who know how to teach themselves in an ongoing manner, and who think critically, that come out of these places too.
@@RedSiegfried "Presidents Clinton, Reagan, Carter, Ford, Nixon, Johnson, Eisenhower, and Truman all graduated from public high schools." So much for YOUR private education...
I've read the Lee Smolin book proposing Cosmological Natural Selection, another important point that wasn't mentioned here is that the daughter universe inherits many facets and fundamentals from the parent universe, as well as a slight shuffling of fundamental constants, which is mentioned. Thought I'd mention it, cause you need both effects - Inheritance and Shuffling for Cosmological evolution to happen. Its a really good video, as all the PBS vids are.
Since in theory space/time switch roles in a black hole, what if black holes lead back to the start of our own universe. So basically the universe would be self contained and fueling its own creation.
The anthropic principle is philosophically bunk, but so is our need to explain how this universe happened without the anthropic principle. Just because an event seems incredibly unlikely, yet happened, doesn't mean there must be reason to why it happened other than the possibility of it happening on it's own; however unlikely. The best scientists are those who also have philosophic minds and unfortunately that is a rare breed, so we end up with troves of trashy math and schizophrenic explanations to relate it to the real world.
@@BoxStudioExecutive Had an intense robotrip as a teenager that projected my consciousness throughout the universe and somehow ended up in my synapses, and then back snugly into my body where it belongs. Fun times.
Thank you for the inspirational thoughts, much more so than all the news channels, the drama and reality shows which do nothing to jump start the imagination of our aging and possibly waning intelligences! You are the channel I turn to for positive thinking!
@@Chance57 was it? Maybe it's just a "cup" made to hold something from the water's point of view. The water being inside something that can hold it could just be just something that happened, not a matter of purpose.
Biological evolution requires a means of retaining genetic information to be further propagated in future generations. Wouldn't "the universe(s)" also require a means of "remembering" the fundamental constants which successfully formed them, in order to pass on the "traits" of its constants to its future generations? And, if so, what is that means allowing for the "memory" of the fundamental constants?
That might be the light absorbed by the holes. Photons are eternal since they don't experience time and they might be the way of the universe of maintaining that information. Exactly as CMB does.
6:05 I thought you'd mention that most stars in this universe are lower (sometimes way lower) in mass than is needed to even yield a neutron star upon death.
That would be relevant if you make the assumption that the existence of stars below the mass needed to make a black hole is a sign of that universe being relatively suboptimal for black hole production. That assumption might be able to be guessed at given an idea of what the landscape of universes produced by variable fundamental constants looks like. I think that landscape isn't well understood and that's what he meant by, "that's actually very hard to say."
@@robertstumbaugh8747 If combinations of fundamental constants that yield much higher chances of massive stars forming are very rare compared to the setup we have, this issue could be skipped.
@@coopergates9680 It seems like you are trying to simplify a problem to skip issues and narrow your focus. That is a good approach to making progress and gaining new understanding. But, there is so much unspoken math in your sentence! I am guessing you are probably right but I can't verify or add anything beyond trying to clarify what our host has already said because speculation on the theoretical space of variable fundamental constants is way beyond me.
@@coopergates9680When he says, " we should expect our universe to be optimized for producing as many of the most massive stars as possible," I immediately thought about the cardinality of infinite sets. This concept is really interesting because our intuition of counting breaks down. For instance, the cardinality of integers {…, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, ...} is the same as the cardinality of natural numbers {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, …}. So, you could say that there are as many integers as there are natural numbers even though natural numbers don't include all integers. Anyway, I think your expectation might have been based on the assumption that matter used to create lower mass stars takes away from the matter that could be used for black holes which is an assumption about counting. I think I would have expected to hear the same thing if I wasn't familiar with the concept of cardinality of infinite sets. Maybe he should have included something about counting infinite sets. Also, I want to point out that he isn't assuming the universe is infinite either. If it isn't infinite, the number of low mass stars would only be useful if the size of the universe was also considered.
PBS space time has another video where, for instance, the strong force is a little stronger and gravity a little weaker. Stars can fuse diproton nuclei in that scenario, so weaker gravity is needed for their main sequence to have a decent lifetime. I don't know if alterations such as these would significantly affect the mass distribution of stars, however. It could be that weaker gravity would not collapse gas clouds with typical red dwarf masses, so more massive stars would tend to form.
In the course of watching this video, my mind reached its limit, burned out, and collapsed. Now all input I take in disappears, I'm denser than before, and nobody can get anything out of me.
Is your big bang over yet?
But huge silver lining: A new universe squirted out the other end of you.
Brilliant
Make a better universe next time thanks - everyone
I am 29 years old and began to have interest in physics and I feel unhappy because I do law and maybe physics is my destiny. But I am still so bad at math that I can't read symbols on equations like they are distracting me and confuse me. Yes i managed somehow through school but only by imagination and making it feel right or just practicing but always each step learned why I do that. But now I can't solve equations and how could I do physics and leave law at almost 30 years old.
Why Am I telling you this? Because I was always a kid with lots of imagination. And what I saw now what Einstein found out I had exactly this in my mind why objects move through space around other objects.
I even had this imagination that objects fall down with elasticity to break trough the "atmosphere" of space what I think is dark matter over all.
My English is not native but I will try to explain.
The universe is flat plat and it's material is dark matter with dark energy.
there are other universe and each of them are below the other.
This flat universe is elastic. So if something is in it, it falls constantly down. It stretches the universe. Here comes the clue: If the objects falls down and sinks into the abyss of universe it also stretches into the other below universe flat plat. And it sinks and sinks for like trillion and more years.
And Then it breaks and all the content from universe 1 comprehends into a small drop which contains all essence of the universe with all information and it drips into the next flat universe plat causing the big bang which is not Bang or explosion, it's just this small drop intrudes in a new blank universe plat causing to enhance and activate the universe plat and the information in the small blob (like a tear which falls from you eyes) causing to begin processes which led to almost same creation and developing of past universe.
If you ask why? I can explain too. The universe which I think is flat and already a system in itself. It's content is blank because nothing introduded so far. But his material is pure dark energy fields and dark matter which have properties. Properties like a straight system of almost eternity small points of energy fields which wait content to drop into the playing field to activate and work. The universe and is small particles are all connected like you pixels on the screen. Exactly that's how I would describe it. The universe and is particles are like the pixels of your screen. And each pixel is a worker and creator. It only waits for orders and commands. The dark matter and energy is the fuel for all these pixels to work and create all together simultaneously something which you see as objects and atmosphere.
And when this drop comes into the next universe it's like sperm giving life and content to a blank clear system. Then everything will arrange in billion or trillion years and will develop with trial and error a perfect system because each pixel is working while each pixel always connects and communicates with each other pixel and all pixel together in the whole universe as an overall super entity pixel.
Like I sad I see this for the first time but I always thought that we are sinking and falling. And that's why we think we expand but in reality we only fall constantly down and stretch the universe which is elastic. Causing to stretch many other universe flat plates under our universe to stretch.
Think of a elastic something gathered above the same elastic thing. If you put a heavy weight on top all level of the elastic thing will fall stretch down and object will fall.
But then there is a limit were the first on top universe rip apart and all content information of this universe will comprehend back into a single drop which will now fall down and enter a new under neath universe causing to give it live with the informations from the old universe how it is gonna have to work and the pixels which activate because they get information and the dark matter fuelling the dark emergy to work and giving them maybe somehow of consciousness because every pixel like I sad is communicating each mili second (in reality it is real life and it can't be described with a number because it's love without a single delay) and each pixel of full knowledge of each other pixel which is trillions of lightyear away and connected to the whole system as a whole.
We are falling not expending!
And that is why light is always everywhere and for as humans always faster than everything. Because it's everywhere 100% of the universe. It's like the wave in a ocean. If you see the wave as the light, nothing can in this ocean faster than the waves therfore our light.
The light in our universe exists from the energy exchange and interactions from all the pixels causing waves which work and the dark energy giving them fuel to work and energyze. That's why it is so fast because it was always everywhere. It's like the ocean contains water and if we humans thought that water=light, we would measure the speed of the water and see that it's faster than anything else when in reality it is not fast its just everywhere before now and after.
And what I forgot each pixel knows over time how to work due the information of the past universe and each pixel will give each atom and particle orders how to work and react and how to behave. Like a switch from a DNA which can't turn on our off. Every little pixel in the universe has orders and properties and behaves like he has too.
So basically the future is always written when we live in the present. The present is the future and there is no time like we humans invented. It's just we are living life and simultaneously with the universe.
And I think if some of pixels get failures and malfunction that's why sometimes we get sick or other accidents happen because some particles failed or got desynchronized and can't connect live without a delay with the other particles in the universe.
I don't know what how I do it but sometimes I can see future events to occur like a soccer game where I know that a team will wijj exactly 5:1 or will winn first halt 3:1 or the bar team will win 2:0 and so on or know which persons I will see next in the next day Whig I didn't see in years.
and other stuff. Call me autistic and hyper sensitive that might be the case. Some friend in school told me in a game where we should say stuff about others and guess who that is that I am a mysterious guy.
I sometimes get answers from someone else or wish something to happen and it happens and in the past I was scared because strange things happened and occurred like I wished or imagined. But i got used to it.
A couple of month before I asked this strange power that he has to show me what it is all about and what we have to do as humans and what's our goal.
The first 2 nights no answer but than on the third night he answered me in my dream and took my hand and showed me what is all about.
In summary if you die you will exist as a conscious of many particles flying around and seeing everything oj earth but you can't interact. You also can't gather knowledge. You only can take everything you gatherer as a human and all your knowledge and education will stay fixed and continue on you new entity beeing which consists of many particles like a invisible cloud connected together.
I REPEAT EVERYTHING YOU DO TILL YOUR LIFE WILL the only thing you can't take with you after death. That's what he shower me. The key and goals of human existing is to gather knowledge and if you for the energy of your consciousness, brain and thoughts is not vanished. It will live in the particles which connect and put everything together and you living on and watching. The bad part is her I REPEAT you stay this way. You are physically trapped and mentally trapped. You can't access new knowledge or make new memory's or train you capacity or whatever You stay as an observer which can think but can't do nothing.
He showed me that a small exception exists. If you connect to the universe it itself in its whole you can make interactions like doing wind blows so people in a room maybe think there is someone there.
I am not crazy I just know that I am right like Einstein was. I was always different kid somehow and I always solve riddles with intuition and always are right. If the teacher ask a difficult question on exams and all 20 in the class room sad B, I sad it's Z-G=P and I was right. I always am Right. It's just I can feel it I can sense it. Pls somebody help to solve this I can't do math that's my problem. It's somehow the universe wants me to only imagine it and not calculating it because something bad would happen because I would use it wrong if feel it.
But Mark this in order to get out of the universe when we solve our universe we have to increase the life of humans. Because that's what is limiting us because people can't collect knowledge because everything gets more complicated and more content. The very best needs 40 years to get to the point where They understand Einstein and then are too old with 60 years. We have to increase human life to 150-240 years in order to use the knowledge and capacity of our very best. And by doing so normal people would also have more time to be more educated and maybe then useful because of intrinsic motivation to help us by working for the goal of understanding universe. More people would feel encouraged to learn math and explore the universe.
Dude I never understand a thing he talks about but I still watch
@The Magician You have to teach yourself what the words mean.
A good professor is not responsible of the amount of personal work a student should put in.
Nobody understands everything at the first lesson, you have to notate what you didn't get and work it by yourself.
He mentions at the end of some of these videos, like in this one, you'll need to understand certain things before you can really follow what he's saying well. The way the videos are presented appear like these are fun little clips for casual viewers with no background, but they're not. It's more like a couple of experimental discussions courses for physicist majors only available senior year or in grad school but presented in a visually appealing way instead of on a whiteboard / chalkboard.
@@mirak63 And this video isn't a live teaching, you can google a lot of stuff
@The Magician PBSSpaceTime has a different take than other science shows. They don't dumb things down for their layman viewers...their view is...if you can't keep up...that's on you. Agree or disagree, that is their philosophy.
@The Magician if you try to learn about general relativity or quantum mechanics without understanding previous concepts like gravitation, Newton's laws of motion, etc it's your fault and not the teacher's. Everything has a process, you can't just jump to step 13 without learning about everything before that.
But if a black hole is a universe, what happens when a black hole is absorbed by another black hole? Do the universes collide? Do the constants average out?
There is no "when". From the perspective of the black hole, you are disconnected from the normal passage of events, and would not be aware of the other black hole colliding with your black hole
Expansion speeds up
The moment the black holes collide would be the exact moment the event horizon is destroyed due to hawking radiation. You have to consider the infinities present in the math here, as nothing can pass into a black hole from the reference point of the greater universe due to infinite pressure of space-time. The only time the event can "occur" in the outer universe is when the singularity disperses.
both universes are destroyed and a new universe is formed
From within either singularity, nothing major would appear to have happened.
I’ve been interested in this idea for a few years now and having it all laid out like this by PBS is SUPER satisfying!Thank you PBS!!
Doesn't this theory rely on there being a "mother universe" that came first, and by chance had the perfect parameters to support the creation of black holes, to then launch this cosmological evolutionary tree of natural selection?
steffeeH in the same way the bing bang or evolution describe how events propagated within a context, this theory would describe how constants and other proportions in universes balance without really needing to describe how it all started.
@@purplemonkeydishwasher9818 True that, but it still feels like "putting the problem elsewhere" in the same manner as the panspermia theory.
I think this question actually left the scope of physics and entered philosophy, but it's a damn good question, which I unfortunately cannot answer, and I'm guessing no one can :/
not if past and future are infinate. if the future can be infinite than why cant the past. cause and effect are arbitrary. why not effect and cause. reverse entropy. we are biased to cause and effect because human brains only record the past. its arbitrary from our perspective.
The "mother universe" could have been very poor at producing black holes, it would have only needed to produce enough to start the tree going, possibly just one, or it could have been a oscillatory universe that went through a Big Bounce multiple times before having the right parameters to spawn any black holes at all.
I'm sure Darwin had _no_ idea his idea would have been pushed to the very edges of SpaceTime :D
Biology is more of my field. He actually considered it. Especially due to his ability to recognize consistent patterns.
The big bang can just as easily be a local event in a much larger universe. Once we reach the cosmological horizon we have no idea what lies beyond.
That needs to needs to be a movie.
Edit: Words are hard this late at night.
And the edge is an event- horizon so we could easily be living inside a black-hole. Really very strange indeed... but I am thinking that every single time it's been even weirder than we thought when we got all gallus, thinking that we'd just about tied the bow at the top, only to find out that the entire picture needed radically changed as new ideas and techniques led to new data about the DYNAMIC UNIVERSE ... every single time one thinks COMPLETION, it equals stasis...equals DEATH! Static points on graphs tend to be terminal, or infinite, i.e. undefined. Avoid them. Life and living is always a dynamic process! Possibly the best word ever is DYNAMIC...or NEW, CHANGE, BEYOND THE HORIZON, PROBE, EXPLORE, AND LET'S GANG UP ON THE GUY WHO CAME UP WITH "CURIOSITY KILLED THE CAT!", because that's where stasis and ignorance and death begin.
Thank you.
Cactus Club 🌵🌵🍸😋👍❗🌵♣️🍸🌎 Extra dry and extra-large martinis all round! ⚡⚡✨😈👍🍸
You don't understand space or time...
@@SmSyf I'm sure you do. You'd be the first.
They think the universe is flat but imagine its that big we can't see the curve!!!
A puddle finds himself in a ditch on the side of a road. One day he realizes the hole fits him quite nicely, perfectly, in fact. He says to himself, "My, this hole is perfect! It has that lump over there for me, and even has a crack right there. Why, this must've been made for me!"
Do you know how many fundamentals you are comparing to just a ditch on the road? u should go and read more about the accuracy of the universe's physics
@@Mel-jf9gx you should figure out what the analogy is about and look up the puddle argument lmao
@@mr.maccaman2 I was talking in general, if we'll talk about how ur existence is just a coincidence then sure, the comparison fits perfectly, I mean if we were to assume a complexity factor it'll be nearly the same, they'll both get 10.. for humans tho it'll be 10 to the power 20.. but come on, they still have 10 in common.. no biggie
@@Mel-jf9gx Complexity doesn't matter with what i'm saying though, and could you also cite a source for a 10^20 "complexity factor?" No matter how complex it is the analogy works. If the universe weren't suitable for intelligent life to evolve, then there would be no intelligent life to observe it. If there were no ditch in a road for a puddle to fall into, then there would be no puddle to observe it
@@mr.maccaman2 Sure, complexity doesn't matter, it's all coincidence lol.. the 10*20 factor is just an assumption but it's more than that if you thought about the fact that it's not only about humans but also about the circumstances that could fit humans.. which raises the complexity factor.. but hey it's all coincidence!
u know after the internet, lots of ppl picked up some unusual thoughts to prove to themselves that they are special and prove to the society that they are idiots.. gays, atheists, vegans, transgenders and I'm pretty sure there r more but the surface is creep enough so no need for digging in.. but atheists and coincidencers are the funniest.. it's like u r supposed to leave ur brain out when u join and use the word " coincidence " at each argument and also compare simple things to a 10*20 much complex stuff and assume that they're the same, I mean it worked with 1 so it should work with the rest of the numbers.. the funny thing is, while scientist were trying to discover how universe work they came up with general relativity and quantum physics which aren't linked tho based on ur idiocity they should, if it worked for micro then it should work for macro but u know it's not but we'll just ignore this and ignore common sense and also logic while we are at it.. all for seeking attention!
"Is it anymore than a cool story, bro?"
Take this thumb. You earned it.
The quantum mechanics of the universe is “fine tuned for life” those who understand QM come to see it is meticulously built like a castle of blocks. Very unlikely to form on its own unless theres an infinite number of chances. Hence the multiverse theory. An intelligent creator is just as likely
god is outside of time in an eternal dimension we cannot understand. We simply can’t comprehend it yet. Like a blind person from birth trying to understand color. He can’t imagine it until he receives sight. Or a fish trying to imagine what life outside of water is like, it only knows that watery reality like we understand spacetime as linear. Our universe is incomplete in that it had a beginning, it’s obvious something infinite gave birth to it (space time). I encourage you to seek the truth and live life as with an eternal purpose. Our life very well may be forever recorded in the quantum field of space time. Quantum entangled with the universe, god, and choices of good and evil. There is a place for the righteous and also a place for those who live for selfish desires. The eternal being gave us the gift of eternal existence to share with Him. We just don’t see it yet because we our building ourselves into what we will forever become. Death is the door to finally finding the truth wether I’m right or wrong.
Amazingly enough quantum entangled particles need no time to transfer information and act instantaneously, even if they’re separated across the universe! When one is effected the other is also. Everything we know takes time to travel even light. But if God is quantum entangled with us on a molecular level he would be all, in all. And if not in all at least within those who choose to accept his designed spirit. He would be within us and his holy beings(angels) working for him. This would allow him to instantly communicate and understand ourselves, prayers, etc. and also his angels who are currently at war with the dark forces of the devil He allowed to war against Him for the souls of us, the new eternal creatures of earth he has created. The Word says “we will even answer for every careless word spoken” meaning that all we say and do is recorded on some cosmic level and will follow us infinitely. If we live evil then our lives will haunt us in a place of just punishment where will see rightly so that we deserve to be there. Even if it seems unfair right now from our limited understanding on earth. Through death the veil will be lifted and well see what a dimension without time the way we know can truly exist.
it’s easy to blame a God for our Original Sin through the first man. God is outside of time and knows the future already. You are predestined from birth through your own free will. Tragically many dig there own grave and god provides the shovel. Who are we to question HIS motives. Sadly you are likely to exist through eternal torment glorifying the creative being in his just punishment for your willful ignorance. You will never be 100% sure what comes next until you die, never. There will always be that 1% of eternal punishment. And that 1% out weighs the 99 the same way infinity outweighs 80 years of life. God gets the last laugh and it’s a laugh that echoes forever in a painful regretful existence, yikes. All I know is you’ve been given the choice and many choose to be a fool. Ultimately fooling themselves through the pride of knowledge and arrogance.
P.S. I don’t mean to offend. This comment has been taken from a previous conversation :)
I’m sorry maybe I wrote it poorly or you misinterpreted. Predestination and free will can coexist but many Christians struggle to comprehend how this could be possible. I’m not saying God forces people to sin or sends them on a road to damnation. I was saying he lays out before all of us the choices of life and death, right and wrong, good and evil. Even though he knows before we are born what choices we will make doesn’t mean it’s not our fault we make them. You may willfully choose to harden your heart. God knows that you would and ultimately did create you. But he didn’t create you for that purpose. It’s our choice ultimately. We see god as evil to let the world suffer. When we finally die we will see the truth. Also look at the animals we kill for food etc. God is far above us the way we are above them and we kill for sport lol. Not that I’m saying He does. But who are we to ask the greatest quantum mechanic of all “why did you make me like this and let all this bad happen” there humility and faith. Faith is not scientific at all but thought of as foolishness is some circumstance. But God chose what was foolishness to the world to confound the wise.
At that time Jesus said, "I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and learned, and revealed them to little children.
Humility and faith of a child is laughable to the worlds hardened and stubborn hearts.
Cool story, bruv! 🤣
50PercentBS some intelligent ppl think so ;)
@@Bradmhj You didnt seem to understand quantum entanglement
@@Bradmhj Entangled particle behaves the way it does if they are unaffected from their initial states. If u try to change properties of one of them they will no more be entangled . Eliminating the free will ( and thus eliminating so called "good" and "bad" people cuz their properties are preset )
So pls stop saying unecessary things and try to use physics concepts to showcase your mindset .
I've always thought this concept feels intuitive and I love it. At the same time this kind of just delays the inevitable question ; if universes are formed by black holes how did the "first universe" and "first black hole" form? I'm pretty sure that's unfalsifiable. If we can somehow discover black holes make new universes don't we have to admit we can never understand our overall existence?
No matter what theory you stick to, there will always remain a question bothering countless human minds - "But what was before that?". The only thing that may satisfy us is an entire casual infinity, with it's events extending infinitely far in both the past and the future. Even then, though, it may turn out to be unfalsifiable.
I would prefer the answer of more aesthetical and, perhaps, philosophical nature: "In the beginning, there was nothing... But nothing must always give way to something."
@@Aizistral but then the question becomes "How did something come out of nothing?", and it's maybe even more puzzling!
I honestly am starting to believe that the NEED to answer this question is just a flaw of human reasoning. Literally no answer will ever satisfy our minds because there is always a question beyond the question.
If GOD was to descend and explain the entire origin of existence.....the next logical question would be "but what about before that" or "but why" and the void of understanding would just repeat. Our thirst for knowledge is insatiable.
@@RemiusTheAwesome Exactly! Humans are great at coming up with questions!
The problem is that we are used to thing of everything in terms of TIME. We always ask: what happened before? But what happens if in reality, there was never a before... there is something that has always existed that interacted with timeless existent “somethings” that created time itself and everything else that create somethinng else
So.. even whole universes can be a disappointment to their parents...
Makes me feel a bit better, I guess.
Are your parents Armish? try your best to live a good life :)
@@Devadas44 no, u
How can you have 5 k subs and no content
"Mediocrities everywhere, I absolve you!"
Can you say something to me? I want to see what its like when I get a message from someone called New Message with the notification icon as their pic lol.
I have been living with this hypothetical idea of how the universe works for ever now. I look at ecosystems and I see that they recycle energy and find ways to keep a balance. So I can very easily imagine the greater universe ecosystem following in that manner. Black holes are the perfect candidate for a galactic recycler. The other end of a black hole could be a white hole that is a singularity point of unimaginable forces and states of matter that connect a tube between 2 bubbles that represent universes. Then the cycle can continue. Each universe has the ability to recycle energy and matter from itself to feed another universe, creating a ecosystem that is not wasting matter but reusing the matter from old to feed the new. Just like how forest's exist on our planet. It's symbiotic and destructive and creative all at the same time.
💯💯
You may have fallen into Einstein's trap, "the clockwork universe" where he couldn't imagine it being finite, he wanted it cyclical so it could be neat... it's probably a human inclination.
Ecosystems are driven by two finite and external sources, the sun and planetary heat. Both will end, the systems will collapse.
Exactly! I've had this theory since middle school! So glad modern science is finally talking about this!
Love this
Probably my favourite topic in Astrophysics and Cosmology - this is such a simple and beautiful idea that has such huge consequences
It's not beatiful, it's sad and existentially horrifying.
@@VargVikernes1488 why? I think it's fascinating
Help I cant sleep unless I listen to specifically Australian astrophysicists 😵💫
omg same
It's taken me over ten years of watching these sort of videos starting with David Attenborough and Brian Coxs series but finally now with in the past few months I'm starting to enjoy maths videos breaking down physics. I look forward to a deeper understanding.
Also if anyone has any good recommendations of channels to watch which breaks things down mathematically please share. I like DrPhysicsA and Michel van Biezen.
@@chrismf1407 Chris!
Chris!!
@@chrismf1407 I HAVE SCIENCE-RECOMMENDATIONS!!
@@chrismf1407 ua-cam.com/users/PhysicsExplainedVideos
I don't know what happens to me after 2am, but somehow I end up watching these videos from 2-4 am
me too every night or rather morning.3.46am now time for 1 more
Just laying in bed with your thoughts is terrible. That’s the reason I distract myself with these videos, at night
That's the thirst for knowledge my boy embrace it
I would BET that more stuff can 'evolve' than Humans
currently assume.
You are not alone. I often wake up at some stupidly early hour of the morning, reach for my trusty iPad and watch PBS Spacetime videos.
This is literally all I've been thinking about the last two days, crazy timing
Ive heard about this long time ago and I find it very convincing
was just about to write the same!
Coincidence? I think not!
There are infinite theories just as logical as this one, they are equally valid but this one is just aesthetically pleasing to us.
Jake X I am pretty sure that most find the theory "God did it " most aesthetically pleasing.
Finally, an explanation on how my experience with DMT went.
Safe journeys to all ❤️
LMFAO! And they get there without drugs! How is it that a lot of education leads people to manufacturer and believe the wildest and craziest things? Like Steve Martin on steroid enhanced hallucinogens.... absolutely none of this can ever be tested, or proven. They give their wildest guesses anyways!
@@johnshilling2221 all the theories he has is his videos rely on the assumption that matter acts the same way throughout the entire universe.
"Is it better than a cool story.... bro?" 😂
I love this one
😥
*hits joint*
I have been waiting 11 years for a video like this to come out
What? Why 11 years?
@@mastershake42019 because that is when the idea of this came to my mind and I was wondering if anybody else had the same idea and maybe I was looking up the wrong stuff on the internet but I couldn't find anything similar
Waiting 11 years for this is dedication.
@@ortherner I love science what can I say
Yeah, I'm still waiting for the "I am everything" video, or article, or whatever since 7 years. Studying physics I found about my intuition of static time, there is also a video on this channel, but I'm still waiting for my intuition of the one-identity.
Yeah, I know the story "the Egg" which kind of shows this intuition, but it is not well explained, and it's too focused on the mystical rather than the rational.
This only pushes the question back another step: why did the *first* black hole universe have fundamental constants that allow the creation of black holes?
But maybe a universe with constants to make black holes is a much easier mystery to swallow than a universe with constants to create life.
@@daniellittle9015 Very good point. I'm not an expert on black holes, but gravity being strong enough to eventually collapse into a singularity is easier to come across than perfect conditions to create life...
What makes you think there was a first? It might be black holes all the way up. ;)
Peter Berry The quantum mechanics of the universe is “fine tuned for life” those who understand QM come to see it is meticulously built like a castle of blocks. Very unlikely to form on its own unless theres an infinite number of chances. Hence the multiverse theory. An intelligent creator is just as likely
god is outside of time in an eternal dimension we cannot understand. We simply can’t comprehend it yet. Like a blind person from birth trying to understand color. He can’t imagine it until he receives sight. Or a fish trying to imagine what life outside of water is like, it only knows that watery reality like we understand spacetime as linear. Our universe is incomplete in that it had a beginning, it’s obvious something infinite gave birth to it (space time). I encourage you to seek the truth and live life as with an eternal purpose. Our life very well may be forever recorded in the quantum field of space time. Quantum entangled with the universe, god, and choices of good and evil. There is a place for the righteous and also a place for those who live for selfish desires. The eternal being gave us the gift of eternal existence to share with Him. We just don’t see it yet because we our building ourselves into what we will forever become. Death is the door to finally finding the truth wether I’m right or wrong.
it’s easy to blame a God for our original sin through the first man. God is outside of time and knows the future already. You are predestined from birth through your own free will. Tragically many dig there own grave and god provides the shovel. Who are we to question HIS motives. Sadly you are likely to exist through eternal torment glorifying the creative being in his just punishment for your willful ignorance. You will never be 100% sure what comes next until you die, never. There will always be that 1% of eternal punishment. And that 1% out weighs the 99 the same way infinity outweighs 80 years of life. God gets the last laugh and it’s a laugh that echoes forever in a painful regretful existence, yikes. All I know is you’ve been given the choice and many choose to be a fool. Ultimately fooling themselves through the pride of knowledge and arrogance.
P.S. I don’t mean to offend. This comment has been taken from a previous conversation :)
AIFAHRA HORGGHRO just because we can’t understand something doesn’t mean it’s not possible. We don’t understand many parts of quantum mechanics but we create theories. There’s just as much chance for intelligent design as there is for infinite universes. Faith isn’t scientific but scientist have faith in their theories.
So, does each daughter universe have less energy than the last, or does each scale to effectively set the energy to infinity?
And what happens to matter added to an already existing black hole? Does it also add to the original energy content?
MrGonzonator The same amount of energy
Universes don't necessarily have a lot of energy. The energy of ours is pretty close to zero. What new Universes (or at least ours) have is Low Entropy.
Because time stops at the singularity, there is no existing black hole the matter would be added to. It all arives at the black hole exactly at the moment the singularity Forms.
I think in this case, the idea is that some of the energy somehow escapes the event horizon and goes on to the daughter universe
Maybe the big bang of a universe is happening when a black hole evaporates to death by hawking radiation and explodes. That's when no more matter can be added.(?)
For the rest of the questions, I have no speculations^^, sorry
We see fractals all throughout nature. Could the universe be a multidimensional fractal of black holes?
I also ask my self this question. It seems so plausble too me, but we'll never know if the way we perceive the universe is just too narrow and things work totally different on a big scale just like in the quantum world.
There is a bit of a serious jump between those two concepts, but no, black holes will always be a sphere whatever number of dimensions they have, so couldn't really form such a structure. The fabric of spacetime itself though, you might be able to fold that up into some reality warping bs to hurt your brain with :)
@Geoffrey Harris Ay, but the surface is still spherical no matter how warped the volume is radially. Although now that I think about it rotation is assumed to stretch it, at least for external observers.
I think entropy just uses the most efficient way to unfold in space and that way is in fractals. Same thing over and over again just always a little bit different. That's the way we expirience time and also that's the key to life and evolution. The same think repeated over and over again would have no time but entropy forces things to a lower energy potential and so it's always evolving in the most efficient way.
@@TheArunster The idea of increasing entropy driving time has always interested me, but there isn't any metaphysical reason that a system couldn't evolve without changing entropy, even though you can't do that in our universe I don't think changing entropy is required for time to flow (although maybe if we find a planet sized blob of bose-einstein condensate we might find that time passes slower near it), but it may still set the direction of time (I think a spacetime video even covered that). Not sure of the connection to fractals though, I get it in a DMT-trip sense, but what would it mean for space to have a fractal structure? Fractals don't change without changing their parameters so do you imagine the parameters of the fractal change over time due to some force?
I always thought this but could never really back it up with a deeper theory. Until now, loved this video.
"This video is only half way through"
Credits roll
I laughed out loud, great statistics joke XD
Daniel Beaver ?
Hmm... Where's the second half of the video?
@@vampyricon7026 Sadly the doomsday ate it.
@@recklessroges :'(
Love this channel. Even though most things are beyond my comprehension. :D
One day we learn that everyone everywhere looks at one another thinking the exact same thing. Eventually one realizes we all deal with things beyond our comprehension; it just changes from person to person where the incomprenshion lies.
When realizing the so called "experts" are ourselves, we finally complete our assimilation into adulthood, we decide to transcend our own difficulties and dilemmas whenever possible to help others find their way in this cosmic soup we call life!
Keep swimming!
Honey remember that this is not beyond your comprehension. It is only beyond the level of knowledge you have currently attained. Seek more, learn more, and you will find that these concepts actually aren’t that difficult to understand. There’s just a ton of information that you need to have in order to fully grasp the concepts. You’re here on the channel already. Use the internet as a tool to study this info and you won’t feel nearly as lost this time next year 😊
Honestly the more incomprehensible and mindboggling their content is, the more fun it is to watch :D
@@keandreaanderson3650 That's not really fair.....maybe they were not saying that as a "I can't get it" so much as "I am glad I don't have to comprehend everything here to get something from this channel".
I watch pretty much all YT videos at 1.75x speed.
That lifehack simply doesn't work on this channel though!
Will PBS Spacetime ever release the soundtrack used in the vids ?
synchromorph Have you seen the descriptions...? Its so extensive, might as well add a few tracks 😅.
Buy a JD-Xi or Xm and you are ready to make your own. iPad & Korg Gadget software also does the trick.
probably from some royalty free library.
Patternbased.com might find it there, pretty extensive.
I'll make you some like it if you wanna pay for it
Ah, 2019. I remember you. You weren't too bad after all
Are the constants really "fine tuned"? I agree that if you changed them just slightly you wouldn't have atoms or chemistry, but do we know for certain that you would have *nothing* at all? It stands to reason that some sort of complex structure would come out from almost any arrangement of the constants, the rules of the game (fundamental forces and particles) are still there even if you shake them up some. The electromagnetic force would still bring electrons and protons (or whatever quarks form) together, even if they don't form into an atom they'd become something, and that something could bring forth life.
If you give a kid a set of lego he builds a robot, give the same set to another one and he builds a spaceship.
"...bring forth life" Could you please define life?
@@luc1pop Something along the lines of complex structures with the ability of self-replication, ingestion, excretion, among others. A biologist could make a more precise list but reproduction is the key one.
@@pairot01 so, if black holes creates universes that creates black holes, they are alive?
@@luc1pop That's a VERY big if. But no, then I'd say the Universe itself is alive and black holes are analogous to reproductive organs, because black holes wouldn't be creating just black holes.
"electromagnetic force" think on this path. Think magmatism... How are magnetic fields created? How pervasive are they throughout our universe? These are questions we have answers too, yet not applying these answers to old outdated theories.
honestly this i have been thinking for sooooo long! but the thing that makes me doubt is the energy, feels like it would have to little to create something so huge?
Yes but there is so much excess energy. Taking into consideration the multitudes of invisible and or negative energies. It could be just transforming this invisible/negative energy into a visible/positive energy. In this sense energy is still not destroyed nor created but transferred.
E=mc^2 so even a small mass of a black hole would create a ton of energy for a new universe
I'd think huge is relevant. Were huge to an ant. A skyscraper is huge to us. These new universes may only have a fraction of the energy of the mother universe, but to us it would still seem like a huge amount, because we dont have a reference point.
@@briannalarsen127 "The mother universe" or A mother universe, what if it is all infinite, universes upon universes and so on
I been thinking about the energy for so many years, because it is the biggest question. Where does the energy comes from to be able to create universe. But if universe need energy from somewhere means energy is eternity. but that doesn't feel right. So I thinking the totally energy in universe is zero. Means universe can exist without energy. Like +10-10=0, but the difference is 20. So all process in universe is a process to reach zero stage. Universe exists because of unstable energy stage. When all stars die and black hole fade away is maybe reach energy level zero
"Error can lead the way to truth, while empty-headeness only leads to more empty-headedness, or to a career in politics." -Master Li, "Bridge of Birds" by Barry Hughart.
That was the dumbest thing a man can say . His mom should've definitely swallowed when he was a single cell organism.
Good one hahaha
@@daryljonesfoster4102 it's really a profound teaching my friend.
DeadKingIsDead The quantum mechanics of the universe is “fine tuned for life” those who understand QM come to see it is meticulously built like a castle of blocks. Very unlikely to form on its own unless theres an infinite number of chances. Hence the multiverse theory. An intelligent creator is just as likely
god is outside of time in an eternal dimension we cannot understand. We simply can’t comprehend it yet. Like a blind person from birth trying to understand color. He can’t imagine it until he receives sight. Or a fish trying to imagine what life outside of water is like, it only knows that watery reality like we understand spacetime as linear. Our universe is incomplete in that it had a beginning, it’s obvious something infinite gave birth to it (space time). I encourage you to seek the truth and live life as with an eternal purpose. Our life very well may be forever recorded in the quantum field of space time. Quantum entangled with the universe, god, and choices of good and evil. There is a place for the righteous and also a place for those who live for selfish desires. The eternal being gave us the gift of eternal existence to share with Him. We just don’t see it yet because we our building ourselves into what we will forever become. Death is the door to finally finding the truth wether I’m right or wrong.
it’s easy to blame a God for our original sin through the first man. God is outside of time and knows the future already. You are predestined from birth through your own free will. Tragically many dig there own grave and god provides the shovel. Who are we to question HIS motives. Sadly you are likely to exist through eternal torment glorifying the creative being in his just punishment for your willful ignorance. You will never be 100% sure what comes next until you die, never. There will always be that 1% of eternal punishment. And that 1% out weighs the 99 the same way infinity outweighs 80 years of life. We’ll see who gets the last laugh. All I know is you’ve been given the choice and many choose to be a fool. Ultimately fooling themselves through the pride of knowledge and arrogance.
u'FO 🌈 OF'u
parT 🌈 Trap
exAMEN🌈FIRM'amen'T,
waterFALLS. seaLEvEL
Dr.🌏ip
👀☔
Go fish ¿ 🐟
Psalm 19:1 The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork.
I really liked this episode. These are some interesting philosophies that touch on some fundamental questions about our universe. Thank you PBS.
Wouldnt daughter universes contain less matter, meaning eventually the iteration ends when there is not enough matter for even a single black hole within the daughters?
Also would the highest tier parent of said chain of black holes have so much mass that it would eventually (or even quickly) form one single black hole aka a big crunch?
interesting question. i can imagine it as the movement of the metamers of a caterpilar. The top tier parent disappears and the last child becomes a mommy. So there would be an infinate gradient of matter, since we asume that black holes constantly absorb matter creating new universes.
Yeah, I was wondering the same thing.
Although I'm absolutely the wrong person to ask stuff like this, after a couple dozen of episodes here I'm confident to say, that the amount of matter 'before' the big bang doesn't... well matter.
@@Lancor84 Matter + energy, since they're the same, but they can only ever have what they have, as it can be neither created nor destroyed.
@@Tfin you're forgetting about anti-matter. The amount of matter in our universe isn't a result of how much matter came into existence at the big bang, rather it is leftover from a yet unknown asymmetry between matter and anti-matter during the big bang. Which, matter/anti-matter pairs are net zero energy. Ergo, the smallest black hole could lead towards the biggest universe and it just comes down to the physics constants created.
The concept makes sense. If you change your frame of reference on a Penrose diagram in becomes clear. The closer you are to the event horizon the more the universe appears to contract into a singularity. While on the opposite, the closer you are to the singularity the more the universe appears to be expanding.
Interesting.
I believe this is the nature of the universe(s). Makes the most sense to me.
I understand that if you reverse time, a black hole looks like our best guess at the big bang. But the idea that the mass in a black hole exits into another universe raises some questions. If for example, that material expands into a different space time, does the black hole lose that mass in this universe? Or is the entire newly created universe still 'on the books' in this one inside the black hole?
This means that the CMB is actually the event horizon of a massive black hole that houses our universe. Instead of the universe expanding, it is only an illusion while matter is shrinking.
We are in a black hole,well as from last thursday.
Not really the event horizon in a black hole sense, since time didn't start there but some 400,000 years prior.
You got it and that's what also gives the perception of time.
Matt Barrett everything uniformly shrinking is a neat thought. I wonder if that is testable.
We already went into the black hole and have already intertwined with another galaxy.
who else has a padawan understanding of the cosmos and watches this, doesn't get the math but still has a good time?
Yup
aye
sIutybernice me... but I hope to change that.
Probably most of us.
While high... 😂😂😂
If another universe is hidden behind the black hole what happens when the black hole evaporates?
My guess is because time is distorted infinitely inside the event horizon, nothing that happens outside of the event horizon can have any effect on the daughter universe. Because the point of formation of the black hole is stretched infinitely by its gravity. Therefore, even when the black hole evaporates, the daughter universe will still be fine.
Sorry if this doesn't make sense. I'm Tired.
@@bookend2002 it's still quite weird. When you observe the black hole you say "hey cool there's another universe in there I wonder what kind of series they're looking at". Then the black hole evaporates to a size smaller then a Planck length thus becoming essentially non existent in our universe and your still expected to say "hey there's a universe there, yeah I know you aren't seeing anything and no i am not delusional it's right there"
It's called "Pucker Factor".
Ryan D'Amico so you mean that after blackhole creates a universe, the universe becomes disconnected from parent blackhole and universe and lives it’s own life independently, unaware of parent’s universe existence?
Ask Hawking who accepts black hole evaporation....not proven in practice though
I've been intrigued by this idea for a few years, and seeing it all laid out like this by PBS is incredibly satisfying! Thank you, PBS!!
I love how near the end you lead the audience on so many times before you finally get to your catch phrase "space-time"
All of which has no meaning other than the tri) of how objects move and behave. Space time does nothing to explain an eternal and infinite universe. That is what should be self explanatory.
I’m so glad I live in a time where we can all digest and enjoy this information without fear of literal crucifixion!
There are a lot of tabboo topics that are much closer to your everyday life that might get you socially crucified for attempting to bring them up. Like biological diversity of humans.
Universes passing on their traits thru black hole “embryos “ leading to evolution by natural selection? I think this hypothesis should be called “the Anthropomorphic Principle” :P
But essentially that is how it appears. Even Hawking proposes such thing. A universe started from a singularity or "Black Hole Explosion"
This is one of their finest videos.
I like the way he says “quarks”
what, "quocks" ? (didn't finish watching)
quawarks !
Crazy theory: What if universes favor intelligent life because it eventually creates singularities. If science ever manages to create a singularity a new universe would be formed by that. What if our universe is at the perfect balance between supporting life and supporting natural black holes?
@Brad Watson You lost me at 'reincarnated'...
Very smart call. I had similar thought, when thinking about anti-creationist argument against “too random” arguments. If such universe-life-universe natural selection is the case - then life isn’t accidental - it is inevitable. (Those 2 things may be synonymous sometimes tbh).
@Brad Watson oh god not the bad linguistics
@Brad Watson I don't make a habit of arguing with schizos, my dude. Don't even bother.
@Greg Jacques How would you know there is life in other universes? (I actually agree with you, but I don’t think what I said was nonsense.)
"we live in an endlessly evolving proliferating space-time", seems about right.
Agreed
@Brad Watson Sounds like you really got it all figured out.
@Brad Watson Yikes!!!
Will all be dark one day
Fractal universe!
I've been thinking about this same thing a lot. Humans will never find the answer but the video is, once again, great.
well we might bro we just might
So if it's true I wonder what the relation is between the measured mass of a given black hole and the amount of mass of the universe within it.
If we live in a black hole, would we be able to observe the effect of Hawking radiation on our universe?
Our universe is a white hole inside a black hole. The black hole is centered at infinity in every direction. The CMB is it Hawking radiation. The edge of the observable universe is its event horizon. The expansion of the universe is the effect of its gravitation.
I’ve considered this for years now. Interesting to hear about it on this channel.
Here, let me correct that for you : ".. with an actual science fiction explanation"
Joseph K my theory is these black holes collapse into a single mother universe of eternal time. This universe had a beginning. The other does not and intelligently created ours. Our individual being has been created and will exist eternally, the same way time had a beginning but will go on eternally.
My biggest pro argument for the fact our universe has smth to do with black holes / White holes is that everything inside this universe is build up fractal (principle of self-similarity) and i dont know any reason why this should stop by the universe itself.
This is basically gibberish lol
As child-verses only are a fraction of their parents, does this mean that the mass of new universes decreases exponentially with the number of generations?
Most likely, but maybe some energy conservation shenanigans happen with negative energy \_('-')_/
Mitosis son
I thought the same, but when natural constants can change, then maybe also the amount of energy needet to produce certain amounts of mass.
If the universes are infinite, then then even a fraction of them are still infinite
This is insane! I know this math and there is absolutely NO REAL SCIENCE here. No real physics, just people postulating. This research is pointless because there are no black holes. There is electro dynamics and angular momentum, that's it. Gravity is not its own force, there is just charge and attraction and the order of everything in this universe is set up from sub-atomic to universal scale by electrical current and associated magnetism. This math requires no arbitrarily set speed of light, no bs constants, no equation adjustments and it also makes actual, logical sense. When you do a physics equation ladies and gentlemen, and you come away with an answer of -0 or infinity, you have f'd up the math.
Here’s my dumb theory:
The universe began with the formation of a black hole and that it is this black holes’ gravitational effect which is the reason behind the stretching of space time that we observe in our universe is occurring at an accelerating pace. You may ask, why is our space time then accelerating in its expansion and not just expanding at a decreasing rate since we know that black holes shrink over time via Hawking radiation? My response would be to bring up the effect that gravity wells as extreme as a black hole have significant effects on time in accordance to Einstein’s General Relativity. I therefore propose that the black hole that started this universe created the Big Bang. Both the effect that the gravity of black holes have in the expansion of space as well as acceleration in its expansion which can be explained by being due to the matter continuously being consumed by the black hole as a relatively steady rate. If surveyed from outside of the black hole, this consumption would occcur on the nanosecond scale timeframe. However, our perspective from inside this extreme of a gravitational well that has effectively stretched our space time flat, implies that this increase in mass of the black hole is a rather slow process which has continued over the course of our universe’ existence. This makes sense as black holes do not necessarily stretch space time to infinity. Instead they stretch it to the extremes of reality in which our modern mathematical models break down. However, we know that over time, these black holes are shrinking implying that the gravity well is not truly infinite but must be equal to the mass needed to generated the Hawking radiation required of a black hole to fully evaporate. While we have observed only small fractions of this occurring in our universe, the mathematics surrounding their predicted existence and behaviors is well supported by numerous simulations.
Perhaps this stretching is directly responsible for seemingly near perfect stretching of our universes’ space time. With exception of the specs of matter (which we attribute to the matter of our universe) affect it. Perhaps we could measure the rates at which the universe has been expanding as use it and the estimated age of the universe to backtrack the history of space time and potentially measure the mass needed to make the black hole that made us.
Some days I get so excited about how much humans know but then I realize that we don’t really know anything. It makes me want to jump forward a thousand years in the future.
I have the same thoughts, but I instead get motivated to learn those questions myself. Main reason why I'm becoming a physicist
The thing about science is: The more you learn, the more questions you have.
In a thousand years I believe we will merely have a better understanding of how little we understand, albeit with unimaginably advanced technology to help us investigate those questions.
@@Shiznoz222 I like to think of mankind's accumulation of knowledge as expanding concentric rings: the larger the ring, the more darkness touches the outer edge.
No you don't.
Unfortunately our fastest time machines only move at 1 second per second.
I have never had the proper training because I am dyslexic ... But I understand more that I should with the schooling I have had. Thank you for this series
You ain't had much schooling. The fact of the matter is, even with schooling you can only believe half of what you here unless you are talking strictly Mathematics. This video is children's science because of mankind's stubbornness to think a knew about what makes up a universe.
So, it's nice to know that in 100 Trillion years, when our Universe ends, there will other Universe's in other dimensions, so there is truly never an end to the Universe.
Not really. Black holes evaporate, so child universes have to end.
Perfect time for binge watching everything I've missed.
Last time I was this early earth was still flat.
Absolutely fascinating.
As ever, brilliantly formulated and delivered.
Great presenter - this is how a lecturer can keep an audience’s attention, deliver information in a comprehensible way and inspire.
Thanks as well to the amazing team behind the scenes.
I’m hooked!
Hi Matt! Thanks, I've been waiting for this one. I have pondered this subject for a long time myself. I do have a question. How does time factor in? Does the new universe come into existence as the black hole forms, or after it has accumulated a certain amount of mass, exceeding a limit?
If other universes may have different values on the "dials" of the fundamental constants, is it also possible that some universes may have more or less fundamental constant dials than others?
Isn't it just amazing how all of these discussions start with -- it might be possible, some people think, we believe, the math suggests...... and before you know it, a few paragraphs later, entire civilizations are built upon an established foundation so generously laid out for you in a few prior paragraphs! LOL!
Perhaps the number of dials is just another dial which can be adjusted
The best answer to all these questions: "We Dont Know".
*"We don't know" ..... yet.
That's not the best answer, that is the easiest answer
@@oldchannel_MoM it's the truth. We don't know. That is a simple fact. Acknowledging that you don't know something is the first necessary step in order to learn something. Those that claim to know that which isn't or can't be known are the biggest and loudest of fools.
@@placeholder2617 ik that's true, I'm simply implying that's it's the "easiest" answer and not the "best." But we continue learning to be enlightened more. It's like lifting weights, a newbie just starting doesn't know his 'pr' yet, but around a month, he gets his pr, but keeps getting more in months to come. I don't disagree on both of your statements.
It's always fun to know a good question.
Here's the thing that I've always wondered about this theory: what if life is itself a mechanism for creating universes? That is, having reached a certain level of sophistication, might living things fine tune black holes or something similar to produce new universes as similar as possible to its own, giving the coding of its own universe an evolutionary advantage? This would favour a model in which life was likely but not _too_ likely (reducing the risk of premature destruction due to conflict).
forreal. if would only take one advanced species to make unlimited other intellegent life
Or instead of black holes, civilizations could just make sufficiently advanced universe simulations and the same argument would apply. 🤔
If that were the case then what is linking all life in the universe to all of the black holes in the universe?
@@iodias It wouldn't need to apply in every case, just increase the odds.
Maybe life would want to spawn universes that don't take billions of years before kicking abiogenesis off?
I’ve always liked to imagine what it would look like to be at the center of a singularity.Because the event horizon would be inescapable,it would probably seem as if all sides in every direction would be moving away from you,similar to expansion,and the center would probably be at any and every point because of its expansion.
I imagine it's either a crystal (nothing is moving/energetic) or it's the opposite and everything is just energy, making it a very brightly glowing soup.
I hope to see the day you will write a book describing black holes in the same way you explain them in your videos. It would be the holy bible on this topic, and probably as huge as it, but damn man I would read it even during my job!
Take this suggestion seriously, I'm pretty sure many of us followers would be happy to see that day coming
That satisfy my weekly dose of PBS
Far throw:
So if black holes form a new universe and the data is encoded on the event horizon, could this explain the expansion of the universe? Our parent universe is then just starting to gobble up a sun in in our black hole, increasing how much it eats and thus increasing the area of the event horizon, expanding our universe in all places.
How big of a black hole would it have to be to make our universe seem infinite.
@@pappoochacha big enough to store all the information of our universe on its event horizon
@@JolanRensen it doesnt have to just store information.. it has to store all the seemingly infinite space and all the mass it contains within
@@pappoochacha well, just the description and interaction of all that mass. I see it as a giant computer program that the black hole executes. The mass we experience and see, every particle is described using particles in our parent black hole, just like bits on a computer store information. We can have billion lines of text that, when executed, can simulate a mini digital world and still store it on a thumb drive or even a micro SD. Imagine what a black hole could store and execute using all the particles it sucks up. I think that's how the simulation hypothesis works; essentially, our universe would be encoded and executed in 2d (instead of our 1d computer programs) on the 'surface' of the black hole.
That's a really beautiful theory, especially because space-time expands the exact same way as points on a spherical surface!
That's crazy i've been thinking about that theory for years!!
That's the question I asked myself that same question many times when I was in middle school.
It seems like every next universe would be limited to the mass that fell into it's mother black hole. Am I mistaken?
I thought about that as well.
Don't forget about space-time, folks. Mass may not mean shit in comparison to whatever comes out the other end. Just look at our universe...if you roll it backwards it behaves just like a black hole and it's event horizon. If you roll time forward, it's exactly the opposite of a black hole. This theory needs to be explored more thoroughly. This is the one that seems the most plausible to me. It all just makes sense.
I posted the same question. Seems it would be a pretty sparse universe.
doesn’t that depend on what kind of higgs field this new universe have or have one at all?
The total energy of a closed system is close to zero in a flat universe like ours. So it would contain mass and energy of the space which negates each other making it close to zero. This is how they propose out universe just popped into existence out of nothing.
9:41 "And the lower the mass of the strange quack, the easier it is to convert light particles into strange quacks." 🦆
-Matt
I have wondered this very thing for many years and until they prove it wrong I subscribe to the idea. It would make sense that eventually the pressure and heat would cause a singularity that could subsequently go bang.
Maybe physics are only constant in our individual universe.
I always think I'm a genius until I come across shit like this and they're like "HA someone thought of it before you! And they did it better!"
Same here!!!
It may be because you are a genius! Remember that those who has thought of it before and "better" then you, is the one who can just reflect there thought with other who works with it every day and have the newest knowledge!
I am, just for fun, in these days, thinking what if Einstein were wrong in talking about Space-time, what would happen if we instead talked about Gravitational time? :-)
@@friedmule5403 what are your thoughts on gravitational time?
@@mcfreezyyaboi8389 Oh wow a lot but, if we are talking about space-time, time has no reason for not moving both ways, while gravitational time do only move in one direction like gravity is only a "one way street".
You can think of gravitational time as gravity on the X axis and Time on Y. Higher gravity = slower time but never negative.
@@friedmule5403 I've never even heard of gravitational time. Could you explain it a bit more? You've piqued my interest
Seriously I had that exact Idea when I was 12, and just thought I was watching too much sci fi
God people need to stop saying they had the same idea when they clearly didn't.
We all got stoned and wondered if black holes lead to a new world one time or another.
This is not that.
Me too💜
Basic problem I see with this: these sound like countably infinite sets, and applying statistics to infinite sets of the same cardinality generates wonky results (i.e., there are as many even numbers as whole numbers, and as many numbers divisible by 472,361 as divisible by 3).
No question, infinite sets behave differently than finite sets- not just differently, but bizarrely. But that's about all this amounts to: they aren't genuinely self-contradictory, merely counter-intuitive or "wonky". And given that our first-hand experience is entirely with sets of finite cardinality, infinite sets naturally would work counter to our experience and intuitions (in other words, "wonky" is precisely how we ought to EXPECT them to work). So this isn't a particularly strong objection.
Math is funny. In a book called "The Final Theory" (boy do I hate plugging in this book) it is mathematically proven that gravity does not exist, that the entire universe is expanding, in our case, expanding at 1 G acceleration. I guess, since acceleration is measured in Gs, the math works both ways. So, mathematically proving that gravity does not exist. Like I said, math is funny.
@@enaidealukal9203 What I meant was describing something as 'more' or 'less' likely when dealing with sets of the same infinite cardinality seems to be functionally meaningless. It is entirely possible I simply don't understand how statistical probability interacts with infinite sets.
@@whatsinadeadname yeah I know there are treatments for probability when dealing with infinite sets or infinite sample space, but I'm not familiar with how they actually work, or how controversial or effective they might be. My point is only that wonky or counter-intuitive results when dealing with infinite quantities may well be "a feature and not a bug" here, and so I'd hesitate to regard it as a fatal flaw on that basis alone without knowing more about the specifics
Countably infinite sets can be handled just fine. If we partition the set X into finite subsets Xi parametrized by natural numbers, the relevant question is to ask "in the limit when n approaches infinity, what portion of elements in all the sets Xi with i
The gravity of the walls of the Black Hole that we are inside of pulls our Universe from every direction and this is the Dark Energy runaway expansion we observe.
This is what I’ve always imagined about black holes and big bangs!
Yay, it's my weekly brain hurting session
I feel the same way. These videos are not for the faint of heart.
He started with , what if,
He can say anything after that.
@@Zach3--- So it wouldn't be a stretch to say there could be a creator? Or would that ruin the reputation of any reputable scientist...
Random youtuber here... I think I figured out what dark energy and gravity is.
OK, our universe is the "other side" of a black hole - in other words, a white hole. The matter (and space) falling into the black hole on the 'other side' is what is inflating our universe... So the reason our universe is accelerating in its expansion is additional matter and space-time appearing from the other side - explaining dark energy. Gravity is due to mass having inertia, resisting the accelerating expansion of our universe in a higher dimension. And the faster than expected rotation of the edges of a galaxy may be due to galaxies acting more like a single object, and the gravity well near the edges being "steeper" than expected. And/or, the "virtual" particles that pop up here near Earth, are much more rare outside of galaxies, so, in effect, act like dark matter.
@@nutmeg0144 yes, the idea of a creator makes about as much sense as the earth being flat
Before I ever knew this was a hypothesis posed by scientists, I had posed it myself. It just makes sense; black holes gather mass, but we don't know what happens afterward. Surely, they reach critical mass and push all that matter into another universe.
Same!
Well their gravity persists in our universe. They only grow, most of them slowly. If they disappeared randomly, I would also think that the mass was „pushed“ into a new universe.
Space is bendable. It’s like a bubble being blown by a child and the child is the force and the wisk is the black hole
The problem that brings up for me is that we do have a strong idea of what happens afterward: the black hole evaporates, losing mass (into our universe!), through Hawking radiation. This shrinks the event horizon, and the black evaporates even more rapidly. Assuming, I suppose, a lonely black hole with no additional mass nearby to sustain it.
Also, despite how much mass is contained inside of even the largest black hole, it still contains only a tiny, tiny fraction of our universe's total mass. If the new universe created has similar constants to our own, then it is going to be a very low mass universe it seems. This process only has to repeat a few times before (as far as I can tell, I'm no physicist) we no longer have enough mass and energy to make new black holes in the baby universes.
This black hole door to the universes is so reminiscent of C.S. Lewis' novel, The Magician's Nephew. There, the main character was in an interim world where the other worlds were linked by pools of water - each leading to their own universe. Way cool!
I am 29 years old and began to have interest in physics and I feel unhappy because I do law and maybe physics is my destiny. But I am still so bad at math that I can't read symbols on equations like they are distracting me and confuse me. Yes i managed somehow through school but only by imagination and making it feel right or just practicing but always each step learned why I do that. But now I can't solve equations and how could I do physics and leave law at almost 30 years old.
Why Am I telling you this? Because I was always a kid with lots of imagination. And what I saw now what Einstein found out I had exactly this in my mind why objects move through space around other objects.
I even had this imagination that objects fall down with elasticity to break trough the "atmosphere" of space what I think is dark matter over all.
My English is not native but I will try to explain.
The universe is flat plat and it's material is dark matter with dark energy.
there are other universe and each of them are below the other.
This flat universe is elastic. So if something is in it, it falls constantly down. It stretches the universe. Here comes the clue: If the objects falls down and sinks into the abyss of universe it also stretches into the other below universe flat plat. And it sinks and sinks for like trillion and more years.
And Then it breaks and all the content from universe 1 comprehends into a small drop which contains all essence of the universe with all information and it drips into the next flat universe plat causing the big bang which is not Bang or explosion, it's just this small drop intrudes in a new blank universe plat causing to enhance and activate the universe plat and the information in the small blob (like a tear which falls from you eyes) causing to begin processes which led to almost same creation and developing of past universe.
If you ask why? I can explain too. The universe which I think is flat and already a system in itself. It's content is blank because nothing introduded so far. But his material is pure dark energy fields and dark matter which have properties. Properties like a straight system of almost eternity small points of energy fields which wait content to drop into the playing field to activate and work. The universe and is small particles are all connected like you pixels on the screen. Exactly that's how I would describe it. The universe and is particles are like the pixels of your screen. And each pixel is a worker and creator. It only waits for orders and commands. The dark matter and energy is the fuel for all these pixels to work and create all together simultaneously something which you see as objects and atmosphere.
And when this drop comes into the next universe it's like sperm giving life and content to a blank clear system. Then everything will arrange in billion or trillion years and will develop with trial and error a perfect system because each pixel is working while each pixel always connects and communicates with each other pixel and all pixel together in the whole universe as an overall super entity pixel.
Like I sad I see this for the first time but I always thought that we are sinking and falling. And that's why we think we expand but in reality we only fall constantly down and stretch the universe which is elastic. Causing to stretch many other universe flat plates under our universe to stretch.
Think of a elastic something gathered above the same elastic thing. If you put a heavy weight on top all level of the elastic thing will fall stretch down and object will fall.
But then there is a limit were the first on top universe rip apart and all content information of this universe will comprehend back into a single drop which will now fall down and enter a new under neath universe causing to give it live with the informations from the old universe how it is gonna have to work and the pixels which activate because they get information and the dark matter fuelling the dark emergy to work and giving them maybe somehow of consciousness because every pixel like I sad is communicating each mili second (in reality it is real life and it can't be described with a number because it's love without a single delay) and each pixel of full knowledge of each other pixel which is trillions of lightyear away and connected to the whole system as a whole.
We are falling not expending!
And that is why light is always everywhere and for as humans always faster than everything. Because it's everywhere 100% of the universe. It's like the wave in a ocean. If you see the wave as the light, nothing can in this ocean faster than the waves therfore our light.
The light in our universe exists from the energy exchange and interactions from all the pixels causing waves which work and the dark energy giving them fuel to work and energyze. That's why it is so fast because it was always everywhere. It's like the ocean contains water and if we humans thought that water=light, we would measure the speed of the water and see that it's faster than anything else when in reality it is not fast its just everywhere before now and after.
And what I forgot each pixel knows over time how to work due the information of the past universe and each pixel will give each atom and particle orders how to work and react and how to behave. Like a switch from a DNA which can't turn on our off. Every little pixel in the universe has orders and properties and behaves like he has too.
So basically the future is always written when we live in the present. The present is the future and there is no time like we humans invented. It's just we are living life and simultaneously with the universe.
And I think if some of pixels get failures and malfunction that's why sometimes we get sick or other accidents happen because some particles failed or got desynchronized and can't connect live without a delay with the other particles in the universe.
I don't know what how I do it but sometimes I can see future events to occur like a soccer game where I know that a team will wijj exactly 5:1 or will winn first halt 3:1 or the bar team will win 2:0 and so on or know which persons I will see next in the next day Whig I didn't see in years.
and other stuff. Call me autistic and hyper sensitive that might be the case. Some friend in school told me in a game where we should say stuff about others and guess who that is that I am a mysterious guy.
I sometimes get answers from someone else or wish something to happen and it happens and in the past I was scared because strange things happened and occurred like I wished or imagined. But i got used to it.
A couple of month before I asked this strange power that he has to show me what it is all about and what we have to do as humans and what's our goal.
The first 2 nights no answer but than on the third night he answered me in my dream and took my hand and showed me what is all about.
In summary if you die you will exist as a conscious of many particles flying around and seeing everything oj earth but you can't interact. You also can't gather knowledge. You only can take everything you gatherer as a human and all your knowledge and education will stay fixed and continue on you new entity beeing which consists of many particles like a invisible cloud connected together.
I REPEAT EVERYTHING YOU DO TILL YOUR LIFE WILL the only thing you can't take with you after death. That's what he shower me. The key and goals of human existing is to gather knowledge and if you for the energy of your consciousness, brain and thoughts is not vanished. It will live in the particles which connect and put everything together and you living on and watching. The bad part is her I REPEAT you stay this way. You are physically trapped and mentally trapped. You can't access new knowledge or make new memory's or train you capacity or whatever You stay as an observer which can think but can't do nothing.
He showed me that a small exception exists. If you connect to the universe it itself in its whole you can make interactions like doing wind blows so people in a room maybe think there is someone there.
I am not crazy I just know that I am right like Einstein was. I was always different kid somehow and I always solve riddles with intuition and always are right. If the teacher ask a difficult question on exams and all 20 in the class room sad B, I sad it's Z-G=P and I was right. I always am Right. It's just I can feel it I can sense it. Pls somebody help to solve this I can't do math that's my problem. It's somehow the universe wants me to only imagine it and not calculating it because something bad would happen because I would use it wrong if feel it.
But Mark this in order to get out of the universe when we solve our universe we have to increase the life of humans. Because that's what is limiting us because people can't collect knowledge because everything gets more complicated and more content. The very best needs 40 years to get to the point where They understand Einstein and then are too old with 60 years. We have to increase human life to 150-240 years in order to use the knowledge and capacity of our very best. And by doing so normal people would also have more time to be more educated and maybe then useful because of intrinsic motivation to help us by working for the goal of understanding universe. More people would feel encouraged to learn math and explore the universe.
I just don't get why we're assuming that the laws of our universe can be anything other than what they are. What if a universe can only form with laws like ours? What if our universe if the only one?
Me neither: until we get a sample from some other universe, we should consider that there are probably very good intrinsical reasons for the mass of the electron, etc. being which they are, that we don't know why is because our science is still half-assed.
We're assuming this because this is the scenario we are playing out BASED on those assumptions.
If you don't assume that, you have to throw this idea out and well go assume something else which is a completely different theory for a completely different video.
And on that videos comments another guy will ask why is there this assumption, as if this was the ONE and ONLY theory which HAS to be true.
ALL of these theories are just speculations base upon some assumptions.
And one of the scenarios that could be true if we assume laws of the universes can change is this.
Just 1 out of infinite possibilities.
so early the big bang hasn't even started yet
Sounds like you could use some super novae.
Forget everyone else, you're actually _first._
Why didn't black holes spontaneously form at the first time-steps ("planck" time) and immediately fill all the universe,as it was expanding?
Are they not able to be formed under any mass/energy circumstance?
Even if the inflation of the space itself was faster than the rate of black-hole-ification(so it got big before black holes could "eat" the whole universe), in the early universe where everything was really close, should result in black holes with big % of the entire universe's mass.
A big bang event would relate to the affect of a large volume of mass would have on space. It is not like a bang where we came from one spot, but more like all observable existence shows evidence of our space having been propelled all simultaneously in a similar manner at some point, and even at our current visible scale, large clumps of mass can stretch space faster than light can travel across it. Imagine a mass so large it pulls on space so hard that it causes the space of a universe to stretch to it's limits. I imagine this is why our universe is expanding. There could likely be a mass so great that is pulling our visible area of space and of course much much more beyond that as well. This would explain why the universe is spreading faster and faster, as the space gets more and more stretched by this growing festering unfathomable mass which has created this crevasse of space where we reside, of which we can only observe very little in relation to the scale of things. Relativity allows us to see all the other matter near us as rather stationary due to moving at similar speeds. The mass in our area of space is not the driving force of the expansion of the observable universe, and must exist in a goldilocks zone of sorts, to be far enough away from the driving force in space and time to experience the universe with relatively temperate local cosmic activity (in comparison). Black holes are all over as mass attracts mass. The distortion of Space appears to be somewhat limitless, or at least can stretch faster than the speed of light. It may be that once the mass becomes so great it beats the limit of space, punching a hole through it, ejecting particles violently into nothingness, only to some time eventually have them all gather again due to the inherent properties of mass attracting mass. One could argue that all of our visible matter is only here because it was on it's way to that local extreme limit gathering of mass, pulling all of us fatefully back into the cycle.
The universe being "tuned" for life seems a bit of a silly claim when we only have literally one example of life in our universe and know of countless ways for life to get wiped out both on a planetary scale, as well as a galactic scale.
and we mostly assume that everything "has" to be a carbon based life form which is the most likely but with my uneducated ass I dare to say life does not have to be carbon based, i mean who knows what could be out there
@@Ragnarok-us3tk we don't know, but we do know most of what would kill carbon based life would also kill other kinds as well. Carbon based life has the advantage of being basically comprised of the most abundant types of mater in the universe. It's certainly possible for example to have silicon/electric based life, but is it possible for it to evolve naturally? And if it is, it's almost certainly considerably more rare than carbon based. That's just speculation though of course, but the claim that some make that the universe is "fine tuned for life" is genuinely insane, regardless of anything else. If anything the universe is fine tuned to produce near endless nothingness, and with cosmic expansion, at an ever increasing rate. We exist, and life has existed here for quite awhile, so we think we are special, but doom is ever right around the corner. It's entirely possible that the universe as a whole is unstable enough that it winds up wiping out all life eventually, even if that life becomes extraordinarily technologically sophisticated.
@jimmy Burnett Not sure what any of that has to do with this thread. You're right though, life is no accident, it's the inevitable result of the conditions that exist here, and likely elsewhere as well. The question is how rare are those conditions. However the idea that the universe is tuned for life is fairly obviously false in the extreme, it's akin to claiming oceans are fine tuned for land.
Why is the universe smarter than us? I mean we got science!! why cant we just create life from another element? surely 13 billion years of chance cant be smarter than us right?
@@alikhan8014 The universe is not intelligent, not even in some philosophical way. The distances involved, expansion, and the limits on speed of information propagation among other things, ensure that's that case. I think the heart of the second question is "life is so complex that extraordinary intelligence must be required to build it" but that's probably not the right way to look at it. Multi-cellular life, I think is better thought of as a "city" of single celled life working together to maintain their ecosystem, reproduction perpetuating the process. Birth is the continuation of life, not the start of it. Your body is interdependent on all of the life within you as well, all of which are quite fragile and have a shelf life, so even if we could build some cells from scratch, building a whole life form, in place, in time for it to function, may actually be physically impossible. Now of course we have created new life from existing life, we have reprogrammed bacteria to do a variety of things, we have made glowing fish, and all sorts of other things. There have been some interesting abiogenesis experiments done with varying degrees of success but part of the problem is that we don't really know what we are looking for. We have had success with certain aspects of abiogenesis, but the actual process probably played out over geological timescales.
Now, on the flipside though is the fact that we are building things that cannot be built in the natural world all the time, because we are "smarter". Without entities like ourselves the universe doesn't build computers, buildings, cars, and so on. I think you give both the universe and humans a bit too much credit though, it took roughly 3.5 billion years for single celled life on this planet to evolve into multi-cellular life. On the same token humans just aren't that smart. From a genetic perspective we are only incrementally more intelligent than other great apes, it just so happens that it's enough for us to do many things they cannot, so it appears like a bigger difference than it is. Pretty soon though we will know enough to start directly improving ourselves. My guess is that if you ask a human a few hundred years from now if they would consider us sentient, the answer would be no. We may look to them far lesser than even apes look to us today.
It sounds like "The universe is actually a living, reproducing, thing as are all other universes, here, allow me to explain."
But it kind of is lol. Stars originate from nebulas and planets form due to the attractive force of gravity.
Stars die out and explosions or implosions occur and the aftermath are neutron stars or black holes.
Black Holes essentially form the basis for the next generation of galaxies. Hence why I believe on the cosmological scale, some galaxies and stars are said to have existed prior to others.
Have you seen pics of galactic filaments? The galaxies are connected by filaments and the intersection points of the filaments have quasars. It looks brain neurons.
we are the arm that does the research to answer the two question that caused the universe : who am i ... what is this ??
@@ThePaulv12 it does. like a network of sorts.
ThePaulv12 Iron Man 3 when crackhead shows pepper his mind
Finally. I thought about this back when I was a student at university in the 90s. I just haven't came across anyone else that had thought about anything similar.
Great to see and seriously happy. Thanks for the video:)
don't matter don’t matter
don't matter true say
Your comment on speculative ideas help us explore the vast space of possible realities, sounds like exactly what artists do. Humans seem to love hypothetical universes.
A human saying that the universe is set for life is like a puddle saying that the hole was made for it because it fits perfectly in the hole. Such a human centric view
All creatures and"life" are just chimical meatbags, nothing special. We are the reflection of the natural procceses which bore our own universe. And so our universe will bare its own children in the form of black holes.
Whats the whole point of the universe if it's most amazing creation life is a happy accident.
Nothing is accidental. Everything that has reason, which is pretty much everything, is deliberate.
Sure!!
“We know that the fantastic complexity of life is an inevitable outcome of evolution.” I thought evolution was supposed to be the result of random, blind chance. If evolution is somehow “inevitable,” that doesn’t sound very random at all.
You're assigning something to the word inevitable that isn't there.
If I roll a marble on a table and nothing stops it. It is inevitable it rolls off the table.
If a child stops studying it is inevitable he'll fail his test.
If you have reproductive generations splitting gametes between their Gene's to compete those of their offspring. It is inevitable the next generation will differ from the last.
Where did you get hung up?
Mutation is somewhat random. Evolution isn't. Articial selection can turn a wolf into a chihuahua. Natural selection can do the same thing. Neither of these is random.
Is everyone flunking out of high school these days or is everyone being home schooled by morons?
A married couple has two kids. One is smart and attractive. The other is dumb and has a 3rd arm growing out of their forehead. Guess which one has a better chance of reproducing. That isn't random.
@@similaritiesendhere It's the public schools where most of the morons are being created, because most of the people get their education there. Remember, when you get a free education, you get what you pay for. Anyone can get a bad education be it from public school, private school or homeschool. In my experience, some of the most ignorant kids I've seen turned out of the education system have come from two places: state universities and Montessori schools. But there are also very knowledgeable people who know how to teach themselves in an ongoing manner, and who think critically, that come out of these places too.
@@RedSiegfried "Presidents Clinton, Reagan, Carter, Ford, Nixon, Johnson, Eisenhower, and Truman all graduated from public high schools."
So much for YOUR private education...
That has some very interesting implications for science fiction.
🤷🏿♂️🤷🏿♂️🤦🏿♂️🤦🏿♂️
I've read the Lee Smolin book proposing Cosmological Natural Selection, another important point that wasn't mentioned here is that the daughter universe inherits many facets and fundamentals from the parent universe, as well as a slight shuffling of fundamental constants, which is mentioned. Thought I'd mention it, cause you need both effects - Inheritance and Shuffling for Cosmological evolution to happen. Its a really good video, as all the PBS vids are.
Since in theory space/time switch roles in a black hole, what if black holes lead back to the start of our own universe. So basically the universe would be self contained and fueling its own creation.
The anthropic principle is philosophically bunk, but so is our need to explain how this universe happened without the anthropic principle. Just because an event seems incredibly unlikely, yet happened, doesn't mean there must be reason to why it happened other than the possibility of it happening on it's own; however unlikely.
The best scientists are those who also have philosophic minds and unfortunately that is a rare breed, so we end up with troves of trashy math and schizophrenic explanations to relate it to the real world.
This is the type of discussion you want to have sitting in a circle with your buds passing around a joint.
For sure! Lol
No. Acid is better.
@@BoxStudioExecutive Had an intense robotrip as a teenager that projected my consciousness throughout the universe and somehow ended up in my synapses, and then back snugly into my body where it belongs.
Fun times.
@@ViraL_FootprinT.ex.e u suck
Why? Can't you philosophically probe your ideas without a mind altering substance?
Thank you for the inspirational thoughts, much more so than all the news channels, the drama and reality shows which do nothing to jump start the imagination of our aging and possibly waning intelligences! You are the channel I turn to for positive thinking!
The question seems akin to water in a cup asking "why is the cup just perfect for my existense?"
The universe and everything else beyond, is the anatomy of ourselves.
But...The cup was created to hold water? Im not sure I get your point...
@@Finn-ml6cw A cup can hold anything. Doesn't even have to be liquid. Rather presumptuous to think it was created just for you, yes?
@@brianbatie6650 can hold anything, sure. But it was still made specifically to hold drinks lol.
@@Chance57 was it? Maybe it's just a "cup" made to hold something from the water's point of view. The water being inside something that can hold it could just be just something that happened, not a matter of purpose.
Biological evolution requires a means of retaining genetic information to be further propagated in future generations. Wouldn't "the universe(s)" also require a means of "remembering" the fundamental constants which successfully formed them, in order to pass on the "traits" of its constants to its future generations? And, if so, what is that means allowing for the "memory" of the fundamental constants?
That might be the light absorbed by the holes. Photons are eternal since they don't experience time and they might be the way of the universe of maintaining that information. Exactly as CMB does.
6:05 I thought you'd mention that most stars in this universe are lower (sometimes way lower) in mass than is needed to even yield a neutron star upon death.
That would be relevant if you make the assumption that the existence of stars below the mass needed to make a black hole is a sign of that universe being relatively suboptimal for black hole production. That assumption might be able to be guessed at given an idea of what the landscape of universes produced by variable fundamental constants looks like. I think that landscape isn't well understood and that's what he meant by, "that's actually very hard to say."
@@robertstumbaugh8747 If combinations of fundamental constants that yield much higher chances of massive stars forming are very rare compared to the setup we have, this issue could be skipped.
@@coopergates9680 It seems like you are trying to simplify a problem to skip issues and narrow your focus. That is a good approach to making progress and gaining new understanding. But, there is so much unspoken math in your sentence! I am guessing you are probably right but I can't verify or add anything beyond trying to clarify what our host has already said because speculation on the theoretical space of variable fundamental constants is way beyond me.
@@coopergates9680When he says, " we should expect our universe to be optimized for producing as many of the most massive stars as possible," I immediately thought about the cardinality of infinite sets. This concept is really interesting because our intuition of counting breaks down. For instance, the cardinality of integers {…, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, ...} is the same as the cardinality of natural numbers {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, …}. So, you could say that there are as many integers as there are natural numbers even though natural numbers don't include all integers.
Anyway, I think your expectation might have been based on the assumption that matter used to create lower mass stars takes away from the matter that could be used for black holes which is an assumption about counting. I think I would have expected to hear the same thing if I wasn't familiar with the concept of cardinality of infinite sets. Maybe he should have included something about counting infinite sets. Also, I want to point out that he isn't assuming the universe is infinite either. If it isn't infinite, the number of low mass stars would only be useful if the size of the universe was also considered.
PBS space time has another video where, for instance, the strong force is a little stronger and gravity a little weaker. Stars can fuse diproton nuclei in that scenario, so weaker gravity is needed for their main sequence to have a decent lifetime. I don't know if alterations such as these would significantly affect the mass distribution of stars, however. It could be that weaker gravity would not collapse gas clouds with typical red dwarf masses, so more massive stars would tend to form.
This guy is 1 of my favourite people in the world.