Supreme Court To Hear Plea To Delete 'Secular', 'Socialist' From Constitution
Вставка
- Опубліковано 10 лип 2024
- Use Discount Code ARJ for StudyIQ Judiciary Courses at a Maximum discount!
Hurry Enroll Now : studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/9kiiOBrpbc
Telegram Handle -
t.me/arjitachaturvedi
In this video, we discuss the upcoming Supreme Court hearing on the plea to delete the words 'Secular' and 'Socialist' from the Indian Constitution. We explore the background of the plea, the arguments for and against the removal, and the potential implications for Indian society and governance. Stay informed with our detailed analysis of this significant legal development and its impact on the constitutional framework.
Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 by Arjita Chaturvedi -
• Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita...
Let's Start Judging by Nisha Lamba -
• Let’s Start Judging By...
Indian Contract Act, 1872 by Apurva Sharma -
• Indian Contract Act, 1...
Indian Polity & Constitution by Pawan Varshney -
• Indian Polity and Cons...
DAILY LAW REVIEW AT 9pm BY FORMER JUDGE, PRAVEEN KUMAR-
• DAILY LAW REVIEW AT 9p...
Legal Current Affairs by Abhinav Goswami -
• Legal Current Affairs ...
Constitution of India By Sandeep Khatri-
• Constitution of India ...
The Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 by Shrimee Srivastava -
• The Bhartiya Sakshya A...
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Apurva Sharma -
• Bharatiya Nagarik Sura...
The Hindu Current Affairs by Abhinav Goswami -
• The Hindu Current Affa...
Indian Constitution through MP Jain by Abhinav Goswami -
• Indian Constitution th...
The Indian Evidence Act By Sandeep Khatri Sir -
• The Indian Evidence Ac...
Customary Law Haryana Judiciary Exam By :- Sandeep khatri -
• Customary Law Haryana ...
Civil Procedure Code Series by Abhinav Goswami -
• Civil Procedure Code S...
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Apurva Sharma -
• Bharatiya Nagarik Sura...
Haryana Rent Act by Sandeep Khatri Sir -
• Haryana Rent Act by Sa...
For all Judicial Services Exams visit here
bit.ly/JudiciarybyStudyIQ
Judiciary (Pre + Mains)
bit.ly/JudiciaryPreMains
StudyIQ Judicial Services Course covers
-Videos of all the Major and Minor laws, Local Laws
- Weekly Live Doubt cum Mentorship Sessions
-Current Affairs Videos by Dr. Gaurav Garg,
-Judgement Writing Classes, Essay Writing and Answer Writing Classes and many more Sessions
-Test Series for Prelims
-Subject wise PYQ Paper Sets for all State Judicial Services.
Judicial Service Examinations of 15 States Covered- Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Haryana, Punjab, Delhi, Gujarat, Rajasthan, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir, Uttarakhand, West Bengal, Orissa, Jharkhand , Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh
Download the App to Subscribe to the Course
bit.ly/studyiqApp
For any doubt, Call : 080-6897-3353
Click here for Whatsapp Chat
wa.me/919649876464
#SOCIALIST #SECULAR #INDIANCONSTITUTION #SUPREMECOURT #NEWS #INDIA #CURRENTAFFAIRS
#STUDYIQJUDICIARY #JUDICIARYPREPARATION #JUDICIARYEXAMS #LAWPREPARATION #BECOMINGLAWYER #LAWCAREER #JUDICIARYASPIRANTS #STUDYIQ
🏆Ace Your Judiciary Journey with our Unique Eklavya Batch
Batch Link - www.studyiq.com/course-detail/eklavya-judiciary-live-foundation-batch
● Clear Prelims of any State Judiciary and get 50% fee refund
● Clear any State Judiciary and get 150% fee refund
● Success Assurance with 1 yr extra validity
Enroll now in MONSOON Dhamaka sale and get the batch in just 27,999 by using your Favorite Educators Code
Hurry up! Admissions closing on 31st July
For any queries please call us on - 080-49801290
भारत कितना धर्मनिरपेक्ष है। ये हम सब को अच्छे से पता है।
फिर यहां एक वर्ग को पर्सनल लॉ क्यों अलाउड किया गया है?
जब अल्पसंख्यकों के लिए एक अलग से मंत्रालय हैं तो फिर
अलग से वक्फ बोर्ड क्यों? क्या ये हैं तुम्हारा सेक्युलरिज्म?
To fir hindu bill kyu he kyu hindu o ko ek patni par roke rakha he
@@musafir123
Hindu bill was made by Nehru to appease Muslims
@@musafir123jahil Hindu Bill is civil bill and it was forced by Nehru on Hindus
@@musafir123
Hindu Bill Ka Sirf Name Hi Hindu Bill Hain.
@@musafir123 a bhosadi ke hindu bill hindu darm par jabaran thopa gaya hai
जय श्री गणेश !
Preamble से Socialist and Secular शब्दों को हटाना बहुत जरूरी है ।
जितना जल्दी ये दोनो शब्द हट जाए, उतना ही अच्छा होगा देश का ।
जय हिंद, भारत माता की जय हो !
Tumhara ye slogan hi agle election mein BJP ko mitti mein milayga
1000000000000000000% CORRECT. ISLAMIC CONGRESS HAS ADDED THESE WORDS IN PREAMBLE OF CONSTITUTION BY IMPOSING EMERGENCY IN 1975.
@@PremSingh-bk8qb let's see
secular word was inserted "unconstitionulay" by indira gandhi in "emergent" 1975!!!
Q.1- Was that procedure of Constitution Amendment(42nd) 'unconstitutional'(as you have said here)?
Q.2- According to you, is being 'Secular'
bad for a democratic country which has a great diversity?
Q.3- Were the ancestors of 'this' political party only freedom fighters
who made our country to get independence ?
@@dilipbunty23yes it was unconstitutional as all the opposition was in jail and human right were curved and supreme court also have no power
India country is not secular as partition was based on religion that is the region br ambedkar not used word secular all tribes are hindu culture and jain buddh are also Hindus
Saying country secular is scam as majority population didn't even get a country during partition where they can follow there faith
Information is totally false in many cases the constitutional bench of the supreme court declared that socialism and secularism are important parts of the basic structure of Indian constitution and the parliament has no right destroy this basic structure
@@dilipbunty23फिर तुम लोग का फेवरेट बाबा साहेब आंबेडकर जी ने क्यों नहीं जोड़ा यह दो शब्द 😂
*इमरजेंसी क्यों लगानी पड़ी यह दो शब्द जोड़ने के लिए*
और अगर यह amendments किया जा सकता है तो फिर मोदी जी amendments करके हिंदू राष्ट्र घोषित कर देंगे 😂
Secular word hatna chahiye
"Secular" And "socialist" For whom? Actually the entire Constitution is cleverly drafted against the majority.
What do you mean by majority?
Do you think you are majority?
So why are you afraid of Cast base census?
@@srikantakisku because caste system is a myth.
Why are you afraid of a alphabetical order of name based census?
Let's divide the society into 26 parts based on whether their names start with 'a', 'b', 'c', 'd'...
Reservation will be given to all those whose names start with a vovel 'a','e','i','o','u'...
@@srikantakisku Mythological creature
The majority is what I mean.
Against the majority to diminsh the identity of the country and open a dharamshala and invite people and ask them to break the country as they did last two times
संविधान को बाबा साहेब अम्बेडकर व उनकी संविधान कमेटी ने preamble को बहुत सोच विचार कर लिखा था।
Preamble में कुछ भी जोड़ना या घटना पार्लियामेंट के अधिकार क्षेत्र में नहीं आता है।
इंदिरा गांधी ने वामपंथियों के प्रभाव में आकर secular को जोड़ा जिससे मुस्लिम समुदाय को फायदा पहुंचे।
इंदिरा गांधी ही वह प्रधानमंत्री हैं जो अफगानिस्तान दौरे के समय बाबर की मजार पर चादर पढ़ाने गई थी, बाबर जैसा लूटेरा भारत को लूटने व महिलाओं को गुलाम बनाने के लिए भारत में घुसा और दिल्ली तक पहुंच गया, अपने सेनापति को दिल्ली का तख्त सौंपकर वापस चला गया।
इंदिरा गांधी को बाबर से बहुत प्यार था।
श्रीमद्भागवत गीता को भारत के संविधान का बेसिक स्ट्रक्चर घोषित करके भारत को हिन्दू राष्ट्र घोषित होना चाहिए।
Nepal is already Hindu rashtra.
😂😂 Sikh k liye khalistan.
Kashmir independent.
Bhagwat Geeta is not a law book
For kalyug parashar smriti is law book
Or say constitution.
Uske baad brahman pehle jaise raaj kr sake. Waise av v raaj kr he raha hai bas jataya nahi jata
@@rahulanand7657lol 😂😂 75 sal sey reform reservation khake bi dusre ko dosh dete raho.
Tum jaiso ke wajah se Mooghul aur Angrezz humko loot ke rah gaye yahan😂😂😂😂😂
Use yagyavalyak smriti for law book
मुझे इस सेकुलर शब्द से सबसे ज्यादा नफरत है क्योंकि इस वर्ड ने हिंदुओं को कायर बना दिया है। बार बार इस शब्द का हवाला देकर हिंदुओं के संस्कृति और धर्म को नीचा दिखाया जाता है। इसको अंबेडकर जी भी नही मानते थे
ayodhya,badrinath,hathras?
Lagta he kuch zyada hi aj gauka gobar kha liya he
@@Curious.Intellectualaage bol
@@KunalKushagre prajwal revanna type log
@@Curious.Intellectual bas ho gaya?... Ab congres k kukarm aur scam yad karo aur batao.. Ki adharm kiske paksh me jyada hai
यदि SC कहता है कि हाँ preamble मे भी संशोधन किया जा सकता है तो फैसले के तुरंत पश्चात preamble मे फिर संशोधन कर भारत को सीधे हिन्दू राष्ट्र घोषित कर देना चाहिए.
90% of the problem of danger to the demography of our country will be solved immediately if words secular and socialist are repealed from the preamble.
How...? Can you please explain...?
You are unaware of the problems.
Demographics are destiny not constitution
Preamble से Socialist and Secular शब्दों को हटाना बहुत जरूरी है ।
जितना जल्दी ये दोनो शब्द हट जाए, उतना ही अच्छा होगा देश का ।
1975 mein Congress inserted un-constitutional.
Remove these words...
I hate the term "secular." It sounds "sickular" to me.
India should be declared as Hindu rashtra to protect the last Hindu culture n save against middle Eastern vulture culture
Delete 'Secular ' from Bharatiya Sanghita as soon as possible.
Secular तो हटना ही चाहिए....
Ha to hata do😁😁😁😁
@@beingfithumane बिल्कुल हटाएंगे....
@@MultiRavijha ha to hata do main bhi yahi keh raha hu😁😁😁😁😁
@@MultiRavijha, Secular word delete karne ke liye Supreme Court jane ki kya jarurat hai. Dekho, main aap ki sahayata karta hu. Secular word likho aur delete kar do...Simple😁😁😁😁😁
@@beingfithumane मेरी डिक्शनरी से तो मैंने कब का डिलीट कर दिया था .... अब constitution se करना है....
Bahut badhiya hai 😂😂
secular ek chalawa hai 😂😂
Emergency me secular lagawa hai😂😂😂
Sabko ek hi kanoon ek jaisa hona chahiye no muslim appeasement WAQF BOARD, minority board sab karij karna chahiye
बास्तब मे इंदिरा गांधी बहुत ही दुष्ट औरत थी ।
इंदिरा गांधी -- हाय हाय !
emergency was illegal so all amendments during that period is illegal..all lawyers of india should fight for removing from preamble these two words added during emergency..
Constitution of India ammendment no 42 and 44 are all in this emergency order's rules tenure unprocedural and unconstitutional in India.... Annulled ASAP 🙏🏻
कितने भी सुधार हो जो देश हित मे हो अवश्य किया जाये ।
मुख्य बात बहुमत के आधार पर हिन्दू राष्ट्र की घोषणा हो ।
जब भारत का विभाजन ही धर्म के आधार पर हुआ तो शेष भारत हिंदू राष्ट्र ही हुआ इसे वैधानिक स्वरूप देना चाहिए
Secular world constitution se hattna chahiye 💯💯🇮🇳
It should be deleted as it was not in the preamble when the Constitution was made
India Kitna Secular Hain.
Ye Hum Sab Ko Achhe Se Pta Hain.
Phir Yaha Ek Varg Ko Personal Low
Kyu Allowed Hain.? Jab Minorities Ke Liye
Alag Se Mantralaya Hain Toh Phir Alag Se
Waqf Board Kyu?
जब पाकिस्तान धर्म के आधार पर बना है तो उसी नियम से भारत हिंदु राष्ट्र क्यों नहीं है l ये हिंदुस्तान होना चाहिए l
Use Discount Code ARJ for StudyIQ Judiciary Courses at a Maximum discount!
Hurry Enroll Now : studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/9kiiOBrpbc
Telegram Handle -
t.me/arjitachaturvedi
Hai re ganatantra ajkal vote hoy na vote dyai na votesunechhi Lai dress e police ocivicvolunteer dread Bana dress ke diye vote karano hoyrulingparty vote karay khub subidha birodhira besir vag samaye her loot hobe I sabuj celebration sasak Daler ak bivatsa celebration ĵoke of the century
Galat Samvidhan ki gulami nahi chalegi. socialist, secular sabdo ko tatkaal nikal ke feko.
Where was the secularism when the country was partitioned based on religion?
The very creation of India as a country is due to non secularism. So how can it be basic structure of constitution?
Yes we are secular but not for those who are basically non secular. This one sided love has not been reciprocated and would ultimately prove fatal.
High time to set house in order.
The very creation of the country was "non-secular", so secularism can't be the part of the constitution.
GREAT!!!
agar aisa hua to marte dum Tak bjp ko vote baise abhi to lagatar vote de hi rahe hein
It is fair and essential to remove these corruption added forcefully during emergency when all opposition was jailed.
हटने ही चाहिए। यदि एससी जज संविधान को सही तरह समझ सकें।
अब समय आ गया है कि भारत को लिखित रूप में हिन्दू राष्ट्र घोषित कर दिया जाए यदि कोई सरकार चुपके से अपने वोट बैंक और दबाव में आकर अपने स्वार्थ सिद्धि में सेकुलर शब्द जोड़ सकती है तो आज की सरकार हिन्दू राष्ट्र क्यों नहीं घोषित करती
सुब्रण्यम स्वामी एक अकेले ने कांग्रेस का धुआं धुआं कर दिया है😂😂😂
Supreme Court should not have this power to review the preamble of the Constitution. It is the sole discretion of Parliament.
प्रस्तावना में बदलाव सही नहीं है क्योंकि यदि पार्टी बदलाव करती है तो पार्टी बदलने पर और किसी को मौका मील जाएगा जो कि बिल्कुल उचित नही है
Bdal nhi rhe haen, wapas pehle jaesa kr rhe haen
@@aaryan_B055 जी बिल्कुल पहले जैसा ही कर देना चाहिए,,,अभी अभी एक न्यूज मिला है भारत सरकार 25 जून 'संविधान हत्या दिवस' घोषित, किया।।25 जून 1975 में जितने भी गलत काम किए गए उसे सुधारा जाना चाहिए।
सबसे पहले ये जज,उनके बच्चे- रिश्तेदार (किस विदेशी-स्वदेशी) कंपनी में कार्य करते है,कितनी सम्पति है इसका पूरा ब्यौरा दे। ये जज उनके बच्चे ज्यादातर भारत विरोधी देशो की कंपनियों में कार्य करते है जो कि भारत के निर्णय को influence करते है।😑
Muslim/British laws are not consider. Now only New Hindu laws are consider in Bharat constitution . Those who opposes they are treated as refugees and they can leave the country.
Madam, I have two questions. 1.During the time of emergency, means there was no opposition, there was no parliament in other words, then how can Parliament actually invoke 368? Ideally no bills can be introduced during emergency period correct? 2. When parliament used 368 to add those words in preamble, then why should we go to supreme court to remove those words? Cant the same parliament use same 368 to remove those words from preamble?
while introducing these words in the constitution It was done with personal whims of Indira Gandhi,no concern was shown about the propriety of these words.Hence no discussion needed to go back to original version.
Then it's the personal whims of Modi ji to remove these words. 😂😂 Balanced.
secular word is for religion
but hinduism is dharma not religion
अपने ही हिंदू विरोध करेंगे..कब सुधरेंगे.
जरूर हटना ही चाहिए, प्रिएम्बल को नही बदला जा सकता
बहुत दिल से धन्यवाद और साधुवाद मैडम जी आप के सटिक विश्लेषण के लिए जो हमारे हिंदु स्थान देश के लिए..बहुतही महत्वपूर्ण है..
उम्मीद करते है कि अगले सुनवाई में सुप्रीम कोर्ट पूर्ण संज्ञान ले कर भारतीय संविधान की गरिमा कायम रखें.
जय हिंद जय भारत जय हिंदुस्थान..
Yes! Both the words were inserted later on arbitrarily while there was Parliamentarian in functioning
Hindu rastra bane bharat jago hindu jago
जो शब्बाद जनता से छिपा कर इंदिरा काल में लिखे तो जनता को विश्वास में लेकर ।मिटाए भी जा सकते हैं।
बहुत जरूरी है ये हटाना नही तो देश जेहादियों का हो जायेगा
Kya socialist? Logon ko kabhi ek dhela bhi deta hain govt? Corruption ne pura desh nigal liya hain. Govt ek sawal ka jawab de. Jab hum koi bike ya car khareed te toh showroom ek amount hamesha cash kyun mangta hain?
पहले के सरकारों में प्रियम्बल को चेंज किया तो अब क्यों नही
If anyone expects the Supreme Court to give a favourable verdict , he or she is living in a fool’s paradise!
These words were included by Indira Gandhi during the emergency, which is unconstitutional and non-democratic!
ये दोनो शब्द हटाने के बाद देश से कम से कम १० करोड़ कट पीसो कि आबादी कम होनी चाहिए, तत्काल प्रभाव से
सेक्युलरिसम का मतलब केवलः इतना है,की चर्च ईसाई देशो के राजनीतिक कार्यो में हस्तक्षेप नही करेगा।
हम भारत के लोग क्यों सेक्युलरिसम का बोझ धोए। जबकि UK स्वयं आधिकारिक रूप से ईसाई देश है।😑
Kitne dashak lagg gaye iss karyawahi ko shuru karne mein 🥺
इन दोनो शब्दो को प्रियम्बल से हटाना बहुत जरूरी है, नहीं तो आगे जाकर ये स्थाई जगह बना लेंगे। याचिका दायर करने वाले भाई को बहुत बहुत धन्यवाद।❤❤❤😂😂❤❤❤
संभवतया, प्रेंबल में सेकुलर और सोशलिस्ट शब्दों को घुसाने का षड्यंत्र काग्रेस पार्टी शुरू से ही करती थी और जब कांस्टीट्यूशन बनाते समय ही वोह स्वीकार नहीं हुआ था तो फिर इमरजेंसी में कोई भी अमेंडमेंट कैसे हो सकता हैं..?
यह देश हित और देश की 85% जनता के विरुद्ध षडयंत्र है , ग़लत बात का विरोध होना चाहिए ।
Ha to karo virodh😁😁😁😁
SC ST OBC soo Raha hai ? Kab jagega SC ST OBC
@@XyzAbc-sm7eh Ha to jagao unko😁😁😁😁
@@beingfithumane kiya tha SC ST OBC ko jagane ka lekin woh Brahmin wadi vyavastha aur Murti Puja main fasa hai. Unko pehle mandir Jana aur Murti Puja se dur karna hoga tab unko hosh ayega. Abhi woh apna adhikar nahi samajh rahe hai sirf dharm dekh rahe hai jabki unka dharm unka nahi sirf Brahmin ka dharm hai
@@XyzAbc-sm7ehAbhi to khud nahi jaage propaganda me fase ho bandhu.......
Secular hatane se yah Bharat HINDU Rashtra Manya hoga.... bharateey Sanskrit aur sabhyta ki raksha ki ja sakegi warna bahari takte bharteeya ko dharm parivartan karne ki chhoot pa jati hain....aur Christianity aur Islam me convert karwa rahe hain.....dono religion ke centre bahar k Desh me hain....
Is prakar Dharm k Nam par Paisa aur public religion community Power dono bahar ke country ke pas chali jayegi..
Tumhari pahchan aur takat alag alag country ke hatho me hogi...
.
Support for Hindu rashtra not secular
बहुत जरूरी है हटना चाहिए secular,socialist
The 3 rd point for discussion and adjudication is:
Whether such basic amendment can be brought
retrospectively wuth any discussiin and voting asper the
ऐसा जान तो पड़ता तो नहीं है। वर्तमान सरकार तो हमेंशा डिफेंसिव रहती है।
Hataanaa hi chaajiye.....hindu...raastraa ki ghoshanaa...karanaa chahiye👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
Exactly after that lot has changed. Yousuf Khan was using Dilip Kumar name to work in bollywood
It is clearly understood that it's a forgery case.
Absolutely
Madam you forget to say 1 point ,that is ...When parliament can change preamble and add this 2 words then the majority party can remove " Democratic " word .......
सेक्युलर शब्द हटाना बहुत जरूरी है
Government ko सबसे पहले all india judicial service करनी चाहिए।
IAS की चयन प्रक्रिया को बदलना चाहिए।
Socialist and secular words added by Indira Gandhi were undemocratic and unconstitutional.
हम सब हिंसक हे. एक विशेष वर्ग धर्म निरपेक्ष हे
Removing something from preamble of our constitution which has been added by such a parliament whose term had expired and had become non entity must be done without further delay.
Galib khayal achchha hain 😂
Moreover the parliament was extended illegally by Indira Gandhi during emergency. The entire opposition was in Jail. So if legislative was illegal the amendment to stands illegal.
Thanks maim🙏🏼
jaldi se hatna chahye ye illegal amendment....
None can add or delet Preamble of Constitution.
Yes these words must be removed
Jab ye kaam kiya tha tab court ki ijjazat lee gayi thi kya phir ab hatane keliye ye sab kyu.
Secular word hatne ke baad bhi beef export hota ya leather factory chalta rahega wohi sharmnaak baat hogi.
Very nicely explained. Supreme Court has other less priority business more important. It’s Cristal Clear that the words were inserted illegally by authoritarian Mrs Indira Gandhi.
Since the very words have been aided taking into the other provosions of constitution and is accepted and abided by the peoples of India Instead of bringing before the Judiciary the parliament may bring an amendment in proper form .
Also it was inserted in totally suspicious circumstances , under emergency
When A is seprated from B and then B is automatically seperated. Formation of muslims community Pakistan East and West 1947. For muslim. Then rest of the balance is Hindu religion country. Buddist got Burma @Mayanmar 1937 buddist land.
Jo PIL dono word hatane ke liye dala gaya hai use Supreme Court Kharij kar dega kyonki jo word joda gaya hai usase desh ka koi nukshan nahi hai aur sabse badi bat ki jin do word ko hatane ki bat ki gayi hai woh Samvidhan me pahale se hi majood hai aur sansodhan karke ise sirf highlights kiya gaya hai aur dusari bat ki prastavana ki bato ko hataya nahi ja sakta lekin isaka matlab yah nahi ki usame kuch joda nahi ja sakta.....
Samvidhan ke mool dhaanche ko bhale hi hataya nahi ja sakta lekin un mool dhaanche ke sath sath aur bhi bate jo desh hit ya lok hit me ho to use joda ja sakta hai...
Hataane se bhale hi roka ja sake lekin uname kuch Naya chij add karne se nahi roka ja sakta hai...
Mool Dhaanche me sansodhan nahi karne ka matlab yah hota hai ki moujuda mool dhaanche me sansodhan karke mool dhaanche ki bato me se sansodhan karke kuch hataya nahi ja sakta na ki sansodhan karke Naya chij jodane se rokta hai..
Pahale Samvidhan banane walo ke uddeshyo ko samajh lena chahiye PIL dalane wale ko phir bat karni chahiye ki woh kya kar rahe....
Prastavana ya Samvidhan ke mool dhaanche me sansodhan nahi Kiya ja sakta isaka matlab hota hai ki moujuda mool dhaanche me shamil bato me se koi bhi bat sansodhan karke hataya nahi ja sakta lekin sansodhan karke Naya chij joda ja sakta hai kyonki jodane se nahi roka gaya hai agar jodane wali bat Pahale se hi Samvidhan ke anooropp ho to isliye jo do word jode gaye hain usase na Samvidhan ka mool dhaanche me koi bura parivartan hua hai ya na prastavana me bura parivartan hua hai jisake Karan ise hata diya jaaye....
Naya chij jodane ka matlab hota hai ki jab bhi prastavana me Naya chij joda jayega sansodhan karke to phir prastavana ke anooropp hi woh bat honi chahiye na ki virudh kyonki prastavana ya mool dhaanche me sansodhan nahi Kiya ja sakta aur sansodhan ka matlab hi hota hai parivartan aur is hisaab se prastavana ya mool dhaanche me parivartan nahi kiya ja sakta yani yaha parivartan ka matlab hua ki moujuda bato ko hatake naya bat shamil karna lekin Naya bat jodane ka matlab yah nahi hota ki mool dhaancha badal jayega balki mool dhaancha to tab bhi rahega jab naya word joda jayega....
So, it will be better to add SECULAR "but HINDU" to the preamble
since we aren't removing anything, just adding.
🚩❤ Welcome move
Haan Hatta dijiye, kyunki Kesava nanda bharti case Mei clearly bola tha 1973 mei, uske baad Congress ne change Kar dijiye 1976 Mei.
जब पार्लियामेंट नही था तब ये चेंज किया गया था।
Declare Hindu Rashtra 🚩🚩
Should be deleted immediately.
Jarurat he kya hai in words ki kya hamara constitution by default Communal tha jo in words ko daal kar usey repair kiya gaya.
Secular word has been discussed in three meetings and rejected by members of constituent assembly .
आपको लगता है कि सुप्रीम कोर्ट ये काम करेगा ? अरे ये ज्यूडिशियरी तो कुछ वकील और एक राजनैतिक परिवार के पास बंधक पड़ा है।
नहीं करेगा और ऊपर से आपको ज्ञान देगा।
Who is court to decide. Was amendment was with the approval of judiciary. When adding was not under judicial preview, why now.
unconstitutional add kaise hogya ye sochne ki bat h
@@user-eu6ff2dm9mduring emergency all rights were curved by Indira Gandhi and court is the supreme power not your congress
If there is secularism is there no minority ministry and jobs on cast should be abolished first.
Yes no one can change preamble
Kaise hmara Constitution and it's makers islamiston se darate the.... Explanations...
1. Make provisions from articles 25 to 30...
2. Codified hindu bill but not had courage to even touched muslim personal law that is shariya laws
3. Waqf board
4. Our textbooks never criticise islamic invasions and islamic rulers... Even it glorify otherwise
5. Temples are under the control of govt but mosques and churchs not
6. Propagation of religions are abrahmic concept, not sanatani.... Although article 25 permits...
7. Reservation policy apply everywhere but not jamia university and amu...
8. The term secular means anti hindu and pro muslims and christianity..
9. Muslim league party exists in India..
10. All the political parties appease muslim vote bank at the cost of hindu, nations
11. Love jehad, land jehad happen but no institutions criticise it...
12. No institutions criticise hindus massacre done by Muslims..
13. State criticise hindu text books and not allowed to study it in academic level but islamic studies allowed...
14. State never interfere the muslim prayers that says no God but allah
15. System does not support even in genuine cases of hindus in which perpetrators are Muslims...
16. In India hindus become minority in 9 states but no recognition of minority...
17. Not define the minority in Constitution even making special provisions for them
18. No actions on illegal migrants who are Muslims
19. Everybody knows demography are changing rapidly in this countery but no provisions for the safeguards of the interest of majority.
20 . Ministry of minority affairs but not majority affairs...
21. Tax payers money given to Muslims appeasement...
Please remove these words by all means. Congress and other anti India parties have taken advantage.
Bilkul hatna chahiye.........
SC ki himmat nahi hai isey hatani ki...
Must Hatna chahiye. Because these words added by Indira
IN NUTSHELL IF YOU CAN NOT CONVINCE JUST CONFUSE , THAT IS ALL ABOUT CONSTITUTION / PARLIAMENT , JUDICIARY , AND EXECUTIVE & MEDIA.