This is a great question and worthy of longer conversation. The sentiment here is that we all have the capacity to create art and to take the endeavour seriously if we choose to. Our motives may differ and the output will be subjective.
@@futurehistoryx Art is a process. You don't make art for money, that's not art, that's work. Is the pepsi logo and art piece? Not to me, not in a sense that it is an artistic expression. It is a design made to invoke certain feelings, just like an art piece, but it lacks soul. Art is created to convey concepts and emotions that are abstract. That's my take.
I absolutely agree that art is a process of expression and done for the self although I disagree that making money from it discounts it as art. Why can't it be both an expression and a form of income? I also feel your comparison is apples to oranges. Art is for me, design is for them, 2 opposing objectives.
Being an artist and producing "art" for tax write offs is not the same. You think that red line on white canvas is art or tax evasion? You tell me.
This is a great question and worthy of longer conversation. The sentiment here is that we all have the capacity to create art and to take the endeavour seriously if we choose to. Our motives may differ and the output will be subjective.
@@futurehistoryx Could you wait for like 12 hours? I need to get sober for this conversation. Unless you want some real transcendental insight?
Ha nice. If you're up for it, I'm always keen for transcendental. This is a conversation on art after all...
@@futurehistoryx Art is a process. You don't make art for money, that's not art, that's work. Is the pepsi logo and art piece? Not to me, not in a sense that it is an artistic expression. It is a design made to invoke certain feelings, just like an art piece, but it lacks soul. Art is created to convey concepts and emotions that are abstract. That's my take.
I absolutely agree that art is a process of expression and done for the self although I disagree that making money from it discounts it as art. Why can't it be both an expression and a form of income? I also feel your comparison is apples to oranges. Art is for me, design is for them, 2 opposing objectives.
He's talking about a different kind of art. There's a clear difference between "money laundering" art and "art" art.
Tom Gerrard is talking about how we all have the capacity to be artist. Our motives to create may differ but it will always come through in the art.
worst take i have heared also make microphones more expensive so there would be less meaningless podcasts like urs