Intro to EKG Interpretation - The 5 Cardinal Rules

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 24

  • @RafaelTrujilloVilchez
    @RafaelTrujilloVilchez 10 років тому +4

    Excellent video!!, Keep posting such a helpful videos
    Thank you for your altruist work

  • @13levels
    @13levels 6 місяців тому

    at the example that read normal ekg at 5:20, i am seeing pathological q waves in v1 and AVL and inverted t wave in avl, could that be related to past mi? also i am hesitant that this patient has wpw phenomenon since the the beginning of qrs has a wierd upstroke provied the closeness of p waves to qrses!!

  • @sunving
    @sunving 4 роки тому

    Thank you Dr Strong!

  • @kayuk03
    @kayuk03 7 років тому +1

    6:00 Positive P in aVR?

  • @jelenalenaable
    @jelenalenaable 10 років тому +1

    Thank you! One more great video!

  • @kumaradarsh3983
    @kumaradarsh3983 5 років тому +1

    Which is the best lead to find p and t waves. I frequently face difficulty in finding them and differentiating between them

  • @TheSonnu
    @TheSonnu 3 роки тому +1

    What about upright p waves and qrs in aVr?

  • @sharadgupta2946
    @sharadgupta2946 3 роки тому

    Best explanation

  • @ahmology
    @ahmology 9 років тому +3

    I cant thank you enough for all that :)

  • @edreesalqutel8002
    @edreesalqutel8002 3 роки тому +1

    Nic work..... b

  • @13levels
    @13levels 6 місяців тому

    first example, why couldn't it be third degree block! i am seeing a complete dissociation between the sinus at a rate of 75 and the qrs at a rate of around 40. is it because the qrs is narrow? at the same time it could be a 2:1 2nd degree AV block

  • @SeanG86
    @SeanG86 3 роки тому

    a hero !! thank you

  • @JprestonVB
    @JprestonVB 9 років тому +1

    Are there inverted T waves in V1 in the EKG interpreted at about the 8th minute? If so, does this signify anything? Thank you!

    • @StrongMed
      @StrongMed  9 років тому +5

      +J. Preston Van Buren Yes, there are inverted T waves in V1. In the case of this specific EKG, it's likely due to RVH (or the relative RVH of infancy).Depending on other aspects of the ECG, inverted T waves can also be normal in V1 (as long as they are not present in V2), as well as either in aVL or III (but inversion in both aVL AND III would raise very modest concern).For more details, here's a relevant paper on the diagonal line lead rule by some colleagues of mine: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=25065339

  • @arunmehta8234
    @arunmehta8234 3 роки тому

    What about Lead II, inverted QRS complex.?

  • @xxthunderbird46xx
    @xxthunderbird46xx 10 років тому +2

    Thank you so much!

  • @ellenbaker3782
    @ellenbaker3782 5 років тому

    Based on the exception you notes regarding "normal EKG" computer readings, is it safe to take a normal read at face value without doing a systematic evaluation?

    • @StrongMed
      @StrongMed  5 років тому +1

      I hesitate to say yes since I would be critical of a trainee if I discovered they had done that (i.e. not actually looked at an ECG they had ordered for their patient). However, I can't think of an example I had seen in which a patient's ECG read "normal ECG" while it actually contained a clinically relevant abnormality.

  • @ATNye
    @ATNye 10 років тому +1

    Thank you.

  • @vicachcoup
    @vicachcoup 9 років тому +1

    Thank you

  • @HafizahHoshni
    @HafizahHoshni 8 років тому +1

    thank you!!

  • @edreesalqutel8002
    @edreesalqutel8002 3 роки тому +1

    تم التحميل. ....

  • @mrbounceoffwithdat4420
    @mrbounceoffwithdat4420 3 роки тому

    105 bpm for a 1 day baby is kinda low though. Idk if you can consider this normal

  • @riddheshpatel573
    @riddheshpatel573 5 років тому

    Thank you