American Reacts to How did The British Empire rule the World?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 вер 2022
  • Thank you for watching me, a humble American, react to How did The British Empire rule the World? This was very interesting! I hope you enjoyed. Thanks for subscribing for more UK content

КОМЕНТАРІ • 455

  • @andywood5699
    @andywood5699 Рік тому +155

    I am Canadian and we had to learn all this in school. I can't believe Americans didn't learn any of this. Did you guys just start your history lessons at 1776?

    • @jeanbolduc5818
      @jeanbolduc5818 Рік тому +3

      He forgot to mention the horrible British towards first nations and the deportation of the french Canadian to Louisiana imposing english to the frnech acnadian ( no respect). Also, the burnt down of the Canadian parliament by anglophones ( colonists, extremist) in Montreal , the Capital and then moved to Toronto .

    • @solatiumz
      @solatiumz Рік тому +12

      @@jeanbolduc5818 Ah still butt hurt, you do realise that the British hardly ever think about the Canadians?

    • @AnickaSR
      @AnickaSR Рік тому +18

      I'm from Central/Eastern Europe and we covered this at both history and English classes. I take it as basic knowledge of world history.

    • @annpartoon5300
      @annpartoon5300 Рік тому +6

      @@solatiumz we do your still part of the commonwealth did you not see the com.wealth games in Britain Birmingham you were cheered on by many brits

    • @Crimsrn
      @Crimsrn Рік тому

      @@jeanbolduc5818 because the french canadians are french and so deserved to be bullied

  • @ninodino444
    @ninodino444 Рік тому +85

    "who knew?" everyone who had history classes in europe.....

  • @planetwatch0000
    @planetwatch0000 Рік тому +118

    It's literally frightening about how little so many Americans know about the world. Even the vast impact of great countries and empires on their own history.

    • @plumeria66
      @plumeria66 Рік тому +7

      Americans learn about woke politics now. Americans used to learn Latin in school. That was stopped.

    • @yjwrangler7819
      @yjwrangler7819 Рік тому +1

      @@plumeria66 Explain the 40 and 50+ year old ignorant ones for me, please

    • @dinerouk
      @dinerouk Рік тому +1

      Esp this guy!

    • @jeanbolduc5818
      @jeanbolduc5818 Рік тому +1

      So are canadians . Most of Canadians ( engligh and immigrants ) do not know anything about the real story of Canada for the past 500 years ( deportation of the french canadians, burnt down of the Canadian parliament in Montreal by terrorist anglophones now living in Toronto , imposing english langiage , desptroying forst nations etc ). The French worked with the first nations and get married ( metis ) the british were businessmen , all about money like mehtionned in the video, no repsect . British did the same in Australia destroying the first nations.

    • @bwilson5401
      @bwilson5401 11 місяців тому

      ​@@dineroukThis guy looks smart,but never judge a book by its cover.

  • @ffotograffydd
    @ffotograffydd Рік тому +147

    I know Americans don’t know much about the world, but how can you not know about Canada? You share both a language and a border?!

    • @johnlanderglea6120
      @johnlanderglea6120 Рік тому +23

      Well, can't blame him, blame the U.S educational system

    • @ffotograffydd
      @ffotograffydd Рік тому +34

      @@johnlanderglea6120 Do Americans not have access to the internet? Or even the tiniest amount of curiosity?

    • @johnlanderglea6120
      @johnlanderglea6120 Рік тому +4

      @@ffotograffydd they do, but probably busy doing other stuff like we all do

    • @Hikyun
      @Hikyun Рік тому +2

      Oui

    • @ffotograffydd
      @ffotograffydd Рік тому +16

      @@johnlanderglea6120 Poor excuse, Americans aren’t the only ones with busy lives. But you appear to be telling me they have no natural curiosity what so ever. 🤦🏻‍♂️

  • @ScienceWins
    @ScienceWins Рік тому +75

    Canada still has the Queen/King as head of state. How did you miss that?

  • @catherinewilkins2760
    @catherinewilkins2760 Рік тому +84

    They were not pirate ships, Royal Navy vessels. Samuel Pepys and others, changed how the Royal Navy was governed which led it to be a force to be reckoned with. (During the reign of Charles II). You don't get it, post WW2 some nations were given independence, the Empire became the Commonwealth, many nations stayed within it, by choice. The Queen remains the head of state of many, that includes Canada, Australia and New Zealand. It's an international club, for want of a better word, some nations who were not part of the Empire are members of the Commonwealth.

    • @christinerose4839
      @christinerose4839 Рік тому

      So many Americans are quite ignorant they get there news these days from woke or face book look up Jay Leno asking them questions about there own history 😂

    • @GamerSpartanFire
      @GamerSpartanFire Рік тому +5

      Remember that there is a difference between the Commonwealth Realm (same Head of State) and the Commonwealth of Nations (The "club" focused on diplomacy and economics)

    • @dicem8977
      @dicem8977 Рік тому +4

      I think he described it accurately as pirate ships because that's what our navy were.
      They did some good stuff such as ending widespread human slavery for the first time in humanity but they also did a lot of bad piratety things, so to speak.

    • @MrBulky992
      @MrBulky992 Рік тому +3

      @@dicem8977 Can you give some examples of where, after Pepys' time, the Royal Navy attacked ships belonging to powers with which we were not at war? Were there many?

    • @elemar5
      @elemar5 Рік тому +2

      @@MrBulky992 I'm waiting on this as well.

  • @grumpycanadiangrandma7990
    @grumpycanadiangrandma7990 Рік тому +99

    as a Canadian I'm proud to be part of the Commonwealth and will always revere Her Gracious Majesty. We'll see what happens next I guess

    • @neuralwarp
      @neuralwarp Рік тому +11

      Her Most Gracious Majesty is the title (style) used by a Queen Consort. A Queen Regnant is styled Her Most Excellent Majesty.

    • @teroholopainen1017
      @teroholopainen1017 9 місяців тому +4

      Well, that comment didn't age well. However as an Australian I/we celebrate the King's birthday now.

  • @Paul-hl8yg
    @Paul-hl8yg Рік тому +31

    The British East India Company mentioned a few times in this video, was the main trade for the new world. For the British that lived in the 13 colonies a long the east coast of what is now America. When those British subjects wanted independence & fought for it, the flag of the British East India Company was used to design the American stars & stripes flag. The 13 red/white stripes, just like on that company flag was copied onto the US national flag. Keeping the red/white/blue of the British Union flag too. The American war of independence was fought between British subjects, an 'American' did not exist until the declaration was signed. And many didn't want to break away from the mother nation. The stars & stripes flag shows the heritage of those that made a new nation. 🇬🇧🇺🇸

  • @justme1111
    @justme1111 Рік тому +65

    The empire changed from the "empire" to the commonwealth of nations to which most of these countries are still a part

    • @itwoznotme
      @itwoznotme Рік тому +9

      and others joined too

    • @MrBulky992
      @MrBulky992 Рік тому +2

      @@itwoznotme ... other countries which had previously been part of and gained independence from other European empires e.g. Gabon, Togo (France), Mozambique (Portugal), Rwanda (Belgium)

    • @coling3957
      @coling3957 Рік тому +2

      there are now countries in the Commonwealth that were not British possessions... 56 nations i think its up to now. about 2.5 billion people

    • @Sparx632
      @Sparx632 9 місяців тому +1

      Not really a continuation though, more a club for ex-British colonies and their neighbours (Rwanda, Togo, Gabon)

    • @helensmusings
      @helensmusings 5 місяців тому

      The largest single group of peoples in the world

  • @joannasimmonds3706
    @joannasimmonds3706 Рік тому +25

    The Royal Navy were not pirates. Watch "How Britain stopped slavery" to get an idea of what their role was

    • @neuralwarp
      @neuralwarp Рік тому +1

      There were privateers, but not in the 1700s.

    • @samsprrr3548
      @samsprrr3548 10 місяців тому +2

      Yes please watch how Britain stopped slavery.

  • @nickyverra2175
    @nickyverra2175 Рік тому +37

    Basically the end of Empire came about because of WW2. The USA only joined part way through the conflict as did the Soviet Union, so for the first 2-3 years of WW2 Britain was fighting the combined forces of Germany, Italy, Japan and their allies alone, as countries across Europe and Asia fell like dominoes. This proved very costly for Britain financially and essentially wrecked the economy. By the time the war concluded it was no longer financially affordable to run an Empire, and also the US which was anti-colonialist put lots of pressure on Britain to end imperialism. It is quite ironic though as for instance shortly after WW2, the Americans asked Britain to remain as the colonial power in Malaysia for longer because they feared it may otherwise go over to communism as Vietnam had. Also though, Britain saw its empire project as a civilising mission and so gave more and more autonomy to colonies as they developed with the aim that they would become independent when applicable. So by the 1930s Ireland, Canada, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand had already achieved this.

    • @neuralwarp
      @neuralwarp Рік тому

      No; Ireland and India wanted to leave before WW2.

    • @nickyverra2175
      @nickyverra2175 Рік тому +2

      @@neuralwarp they wanted to leave before WW2 but it was only the expense of WW2 which meant Britain couldn’t afford to keep them anymore

    • @coling3957
      @coling3957 Рік тому +2

      @@neuralwarp well Ireland was partitioned in 1921. there were movements in some countries, especially India .. seeing as there were at a maximum 200 000 Britons in India - a country then with about 400 million ppl, clearly it was not the mass movement we are now led to believe.

    • @lindasweeney969
      @lindasweeney969 4 місяці тому

      For some reason everyone seems to forget about the Australian and New Zealand soldiers. Who fought along side you. We always rallied to Englands cries for help. But our soldiers die and are then simply passed over and forgotten.

    • @nickyverra2175
      @nickyverra2175 4 місяці тому +4

      @@lindasweeney969 we haven’t forgotten them. The remembrance services held at the cenotaph each year in November are for British and Commonwealth Soldiers, and the wearing of the poppies is the same. When I state that Britain was fighting alone in Europe for the first 2/3 years of the War that includes the areas that were in the Empire as they were still viewed as Britain by the British at the time, so saying Britain is interchangeable with saying the British Empire or Britain and her Empire.

  • @vtbn53
    @vtbn53 Рік тому +10

    It didn't break up as such, it became the Commonwealth, but the sheer cost of two vicious world wars made the upkeep of the empire too expensive to maintain.

  • @joannahampton5979
    @joannahampton5979 Рік тому +75

    I understand how limited the public education is in the U.S. BUT am very surprised(you didn't know about British colonies in your own country's history 🤦‍♀️) that as an adult you still know so little about the rest of the world. You can learn in an informative & entertaining way through documentaries and even some historically correct movies based on true events. UA-cam & Google search are at your fingertips, literally to find them

    • @zenonorth1193
      @zenonorth1193 Рік тому +11

      A rather sad side-effect of the internet is the disappearance of printed world atlases from people's homes. Nowadays, we just look on-line for the specific location we're momentarily interested in. I'm actually grateful to have been born so long before the internet that as a kid and young adult I used to spend hours staring at atlases. It didn't teach me any history, but at least it gave me an idea of where things are relative to one another. Not tooting my own horn - it's an experience many people my age (and older, as well as some younger) had. I'm just grateful for it.

    • @kyle381000
      @kyle381000 Рік тому +20

      Having been to the USA dozens of times, my experience has been that most Americans are incredibly insular and generally know very little about most things beyond the borders of their own states, much less their own country and even less about the rest of the world.
      This is why I always cringe when hearing Americans self-describe their President as 'the Leader of the Free World'. The POTUS may have served in that role temporarily during the Cold War, but the rest of the world moved past it a long time ago.

    • @susanletissier9729
      @susanletissier9729 Рік тому +2

      Spain had bigger ships!

    • @GamerSpartanFire
      @GamerSpartanFire Рік тому +1

      Remember that in the USA they teach a doctored version of history to make the USA look better than it actually was.
      They don't teach the truth or at least the full truth about both the Slave Trade and the US Civil War or how the rest of the world is able to operate without intervention from the USA

    • @GamerSpartanFire
      @GamerSpartanFire Рік тому +5

      @@susanletissier9729 As I recall weren't those larger ship more prone to sinking in storms due to the lack of maneuverability and heavier cargo loads?

  • @karenblackadder1183
    @karenblackadder1183 Рік тому +20

    It was the Merchant Navy (unarmed) that established the Empire.
    The Royal Navy was there to defend the merchant ships.

    • @coling3957
      @coling3957 Рік тому

      most merchant ships up to 20th century were often armed.. until the 19th century merchant ships were often involved in combat at sea. it simply was not safe to go sailing around the world with guns - big guns..

  • @alchristie5112
    @alchristie5112 11 місяців тому +5

    The empire didn’t break up, each country was given its independence although most became part of what became the Commonwealth of nations; 54 countries from which its citizens can join the UK military.
    While Britain is indeed a small island, our Queen and now King is head of state to over a billion people. This is why it was such a force during the world wars and continues to be today.

  • @lindylou7853
    @lindylou7853 Рік тому +19

    Canada, Australia and New Zealand all have the same sovereign as the UK - for now.

  • @paulmidsussex3409
    @paulmidsussex3409 Рік тому +12

    What you have to realise is that although the British Army was very well organised it was never very large. Britain coopted local rulers and recruited local soldiers in India. In Australia local army and police units were appointed. In the 13 American colonies Britain had loyalist volunteers as well as Native American allies and escaped slaves forming black regiments. Canada had local militias. The British Army would only be sent in force if there was conflict. Also a large number of these territories had the largest population centres on the coast or major rivers and the Royal Navy ships were floating fortresses with artillary and marines and could often trigger surrender or negatiation with a blockade.

  • @daveatherton981
    @daveatherton981 Рік тому +8

    Its not like an island it is an island..... i've visited U.S. a few times, one time in Fort Bragg, NC, in a bar, four of us, me from Greater Manchester (AKA Shaun Ryder), Marv (North East, Gordie), Vince (Scouser) and Geezer (Cocknie) - bless the waitress, when she got to Vince, after struggling with me and Marv, she Said 'hey, do you guys speak english'....marv said 'Speak it pet i am it'....she had no idea, omg how we all laughed, oh fuck hahahahhhaa,

  • @alexwright9253
    @alexwright9253 Рік тому +14

    The Royal Navy were not pirate ships!!

  • @lindylou7853
    @lindylou7853 Рік тому +19

    The tonnage of British ships doubled in the 20 years after Charles II was restored to the throne. We also invented standardisation of daily required ship parts before that every ship was a total one-off. So, forget your Henry Ford, we got there first for ship bits and bobs and repairs.

    • @JohnDoe-xz1mw
      @JohnDoe-xz1mw Рік тому

      the simpsons already did that...and by simpsons i of course mean carthage.

  • @morganetches3749
    @morganetches3749 Рік тому +10

    They’re just ships… all ships had sails back in the day, not just pirates…

  • @richardcook9794
    @richardcook9794 Рік тому +21

    The empire fell for 2 major reasons
    1 the debt of ending slavery was so big it took untill 2015 to fully pay off
    2 fighting to save the world from tyranny and keep freedom alive in 2 World wars practically alone... the latter for 3 years, while scared countries looked from under their blankets ,
    So basically it ran out of money

    • @GamerSpartanFire
      @GamerSpartanFire Рік тому +3

      Don't forget the massive bill that the USA gave us after WWII and i recall hearing something about a deal made with the USA before they joined the war where one of the costs was for the UK to use different trade routs in parts of the world than were had been using (increased the cost of trade in those regions for the empire)

    • @Crimsrn
      @Crimsrn Рік тому

      the empire's biggest cripple consistently was always money, it's quite annoying. if we managed our money better we'd probably still be the dominant western power lol

  • @SilentMoviesAreGood
    @SilentMoviesAreGood Рік тому +15

    When those early ships were going around the world there was no Suez Canal shortcut like we use today. They had to go right round the bottom of Africa to reach Australia or India. Voyages of 6 months. Often longer.

    • @gillcawthorn7572
      @gillcawthorn7572 Рік тому +2

      If I was able to speak to a Sea Captain ,Naval or Merchant of the sailing ship era, and explain to him how different navigation of the seas is today , I would start by showing him the Suez and Panama canals .

  • @plumeria66
    @plumeria66 Рік тому +4

    That is why everywhere you either speak the English language or are learning it.

  • @OblivionGate
    @OblivionGate Рік тому +23

    You need to watch "Every Country England Has Invaded :Visualised" by Real Life Lore, it'll give you a better idea of how and when England got its Empire. I know you've already watched The Difference Between The UK, Great Britain and England so you know that the Commonwealth is run by the Crown and Queen Elizabeth is its head, its basically all former nations and some that still are part of the Empire consisting of 54 countries, including Canada, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa. England and the UK are still a huge influence on the world with many overseas territories, that's why so many countries still have the Union Flag on their flag, even Hawiai which as you know is a US state has the Union Flag on its flag.

    • @neuralwarp
      @neuralwarp Рік тому

      It's rubbish. By England they mean GB, and by GB they mean UK. Much of the British Empire was built under Irish prime ministers of the UK, and usually countries were queuing up to join.

    • @OblivionGate
      @OblivionGate Рік тому +3

      @@neuralwarp Great Britain is a geographical term, it just refers to the main island and within that island are the 3 countries of England, Scotland and Wales. England was its own country back in the day and the UK is a relatively new entity, so England was conquering countries before that, on its own accord. Just watch the video or even learn some history. Ireland didn't have anything to do with it, Ireland was ONE of the countries that England colonised as early as 1169. England wasn't working for Ireland, it was the other way round. So don't talk rubbish. Ireland was subservient to England. The UK was only formed in the 1700's so England was conquering way before that as a country on its own. And where do you get off sprouting crap like the British Empire was built under Irish Prime Ministers, no it wasn't. Absolute lies. Learn some history.

  • @marklivingstone3710
    @marklivingstone3710 Рік тому +4

    Didn’t show up on the map, they also owned British Samoa, British Virgin Islands, Hawaii, half the Islands in the Caribbean, New Zealand, Singapore and Fiji. By the end of WW2 to 1965, they lost most of it with the countries either being granted or taking independence. With some exceptions, most of the former colonies and Dominions formed and became the Commonwealth, even after becoming Indepedent.

  • @AlSnoopsReid
    @AlSnoopsReid Рік тому +4

    It used to take at least six months for a sailing ship to sail from Britain to India in the 1800's. Crazy huh??

  • @lindylou7853
    @lindylou7853 Рік тому +12

    Canada has the biggest land area after Russia.

  • @billydonaldson6483
    @billydonaldson6483 Рік тому +2

    The Indian Mutiny of the Sepoy soldiers was the result of their religious opposition to the animal fat used in the production of cartridges. When India gained independence in 1948 it was the 12th largest economy in the world. The railway infrastructure alone was larger than most countries. Most rail lines in the US go East to West, the Brits on the other hand built the railway infrastructure on a greater scale throughout the Empire. The Commonwealth shares similar rule of law and government as that in the U.K. this plus a common language is a major factor in international trade. That’s why English is the language of trade and communication on a world wide scale. Most air traffic controllers use English to communicate with aircrew.

  • @ngaourapahoe
    @ngaourapahoe Рік тому +1

    I love to see you marvelling at these new notions ! It must be exhilarating.

  • @andrewsims4123
    @andrewsims4123 Рік тому +14

    Great reaction thanks 😀is Americas motto 'i don't understand" ? Surely the whole point of you watching videos is so that you then do understand ? Though watching poorly made cartoons do not help 😀

  • @colindixon7976
    @colindixon7976 Рік тому +3

    Great videos! Keep them coming 😊

  • @davidforman6191
    @davidforman6191 Рік тому +6

    Britain linked its colonies by telegraph cable so was able to communicate with them well before telephone was invented.

  • @shymike
    @shymike Рік тому +8

    You do realise there's still a commonwealth?!

  • @heatherfruin5050
    @heatherfruin5050 Рік тому +9

    Why did you call them pirate ships, they weren't.. Again I learnt a lot of this in primary school in Australia but I don't think it's been taught anymore.

    • @Crimsrn
      @Crimsrn Рік тому +1

      it is, just not in the us

  • @hadesdogs4366
    @hadesdogs4366 Рік тому +5

    You are correct in the statement that practically everyone was building empires

  • @oliversherman2414
    @oliversherman2414 Рік тому

    I love your channel keep up the great stuff

  • @catherinerobilliard7662
    @catherinerobilliard7662 Рік тому +2

    How did the British Empire end in 1938? The clue is in the date. In 1939 Britain refused the offer of neutrality by Nazi Germany and declared war, very soon going it alone, while other nations, mostly the US, stood back and made a very handsome profit, not entering the war until their hand was forced at the very end of 1941. The war debt to the US and Canada was not paid, with interest, until 2007 by which time the US shared world leadership with the Soviet Union, and when the Soviet Union collapsed at the very end of 1991, did the US become world leader, soon to lose out to the enormity of China, which brings concern to all democratic loving countries.

  • @markrichardson3421
    @markrichardson3421 Рік тому +6

    You need to check out the commonwealth. Do a search for ' the queen's 54 countries'

  • @stanislavbandur7355
    @stanislavbandur7355 Рік тому +2

    there is a saying "There is no sunset over British Empire"

  • @zaphodbeeblebrox6627
    @zaphodbeeblebrox6627 Рік тому +6

    The UK can thank WW2 for the break up of the British Empire.
    At the end of the war Britain was stretched to capacity, financially fook’d, and incapable of administering its colonies.
    The British navy was worn out and a lot of colonies starting with India sued for the right to independence and ability to govern without British interference.
    India divided in 1947 to become Pakistan and India (which was the jewel in the crown of the British empire) and once India was gone, all the other colonies decided they wanted to be free of Great Britain.
    And so the rot set in and without it’s ability to exert its influence, one by one over the course of 50 years the colonies gained their independence.

    • @marycarver1542
      @marycarver1542 9 місяців тому +1

      However, even those countries who have gone for "independence
      " have chosen to remain IN the Commonwealth.

  • @colingregory7464
    @colingregory7464 Рік тому +4

    One our major exports thru the empire was our convicts (yeah free labour), many were sent to the US up to independence at which time we started exporting to Australia

  • @Mugtree
    @Mugtree Рік тому +13

    Yeap as has been said the Empire is still kinda there as the Commonwealth but that is also voluntary. After the Second world war the UK was broke and started to willingly give counties their independence. Funny some didn’t want it 🤷‍♂️. So now we have a mixed bag of commonwealth. Commonwealth realms. Crown colonies. British over seas territories etc.

    • @TitanLRV
      @TitanLRV 12 днів тому +1

      Yeah some countries preferred to stay within the empire for economic reasons and for protection and some just enjoyed belonging to something "greater"

  • @carlchapman4053
    @carlchapman4053 9 місяців тому +1

    The Naval Defence Act 1889 was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It received royal assent on 31 May 1889 and formally adopted the "two-power standard" and increased the United Kingdom's naval strength. The standard called for the Royal Navy to maintain a number of battleships at least equal to the combined strength of the next two largest navies in the world.

  • @mskatonic7240
    @mskatonic7240 Рік тому +3

    17:55 short answer, World War 2. Britain no longer had the resources to hold on to it after that. There were resistance movements for years but after the war, they picked up momentum. India went first then various African nations and once a few got independence, wasn’t long before the rest followed. The Empire was largely gone by the 1970s. Also the US was taking over as a global superpower by then, it was more than happy for colonies to get political independence but economically end up dependent on the US, particularly once the Cold War got going.

    • @marycarver1542
      @marycarver1542 9 місяців тому +1

      Actually, they remain within the Commonwealth, but 15 of the nations chose to elect their own Head of State
      in place of the Queen, but to remain in all other respects !

    • @wessexdruid7598
      @wessexdruid7598 2 місяці тому

      The US actively worked to break up the British Empire.

  • @user-uu1gk4ed1c
    @user-uu1gk4ed1c Місяць тому +1

    This lad is a very nice person. He cheerfully admits his ignorance of the continent he is from. He, for me, exemplifies American's lack of an enquiring mind when it comes to history and geography. Canada is on your northern border and you don't know anything about the place. Although this lad is as thick as a plank...he is at least willing to learn.

  • @nickfergy1611
    @nickfergy1611 Рік тому +1

    So hard to concentrate on the reactions. Literally spend all my time waiting for the left hand to come up so I can see what ring is worn 😂 also legit spend each video just wishing Ryan was here rn 👌

  • @brendahuxtable8767
    @brendahuxtable8767 Рік тому +1

    Please let us listen to commentary , I have family and friends living in Australia and Canada who we trade with and I have had many happy holidays there.

  • @Lioness_UTV
    @Lioness_UTV Рік тому +3

    Pretty impressive considering we survived the Roman's, the Norman's, the Vikings and such. In retrospect they contributed to what we became.

    • @Crimsrn
      @Crimsrn Рік тому +1

      well we didn't survive the normans, they integrated into our society, they had no plans of proper conquest

  • @lizstratton9689
    @lizstratton9689 Рік тому +4

    The British are ultimately descended from Vikings - we just re-branded ourselves but the message is still the same - we come in peace, we want to trade, if you don't want to trade that cool because we also love a good fight and as were here it would be a shame to miss an opportunity :) After WWII we re-branded again and became the Commonwealth - you should check out the Commonwealth as it's got bigger recently. Sadly the USA opted out of the Empire and the Commonwealth in preference for keeping Slavery going.

  • @Zippy66
    @Zippy66 Рік тому +4

    Please tell me Wuzer/Ryan Was/Ryan Wass if you're related to Tyler Bucket/Tyler Walker and the other Tyler (whose name temporarily escapes me)

    • @Zippy66
      @Zippy66 Рік тому

      @@pamelacole2756 Yes, Tyler is "average American" and Wuzer/Ryan is "humble American". It seems like only the British have noticed they're taking the piss and not the Norwegians/Australians etc. Still want to know if they're related and having a competition though!

  • @Chris_GY1
    @Chris_GY1 Рік тому +6

    France for example under Napoleon Bonaparte didn’t do anything like Britain did he was a dictator and went conquering, we defeated the French in 1814 sent him to the Island of Elba he escaped and after thrashing him at The Battle of Waterloo sent the little Corsican to the Island of St Helena he died six years later. Britain 🇬🇧 took Egypt 🇪🇬 from the French.

    • @matthewrussell8590
      @matthewrussell8590 Рік тому

      yes it paved the way for the British century. it guaranteed the British would be unrivalled for a century as a world leading great power
      which is mostly accurate until Germany and the U.S started to catch up back end of the 19th century

  • @sampeeps3371
    @sampeeps3371 Рік тому +8

    The football World Cup is being held it Qatar. Isrealis were unhappy trying to buy tickets because they couldn't find isreal on the list of countries, only to find they were under the name "occupied territories of Palestine" 😂😂 class from Qatar

  • @johnmccarron
    @johnmccarron Рік тому +2

    Britain had one man a bike and a notebook in India.

  • @WLDB
    @WLDB Рік тому +4

    The breakup was pretty peaceful. Basically it got too big to manage and they started giving more and more power to the locals. Then one by one they just became fully independent.

    • @conallmclaughlin4545
      @conallmclaughlin4545 Рік тому

      Not quite, they inflicted so much cruelty on the people, they got fed up and fought back. South Africa, india and Ireland are good examples

    • @coling3957
      @coling3957 Рік тому

      @@conallmclaughlin4545 haha not exactly. Ireland was settled in 1921 - and they immediately started fighting eachother. by South Africa you prob means the Boers - who discriminated against English settlers ( let alone black Africans ) and caused the Boer Wars. it was not the British who created Apartheid.

    • @conallmclaughlin4545
      @conallmclaughlin4545 Рік тому

      @@coling3957 Ireland was definitely not settled then 😂😂 that's hilarious

    • @Crimsrn
      @Crimsrn Рік тому

      @@conallmclaughlin4545 south africa wasn't treated too badly, india yeah but most british on indian deaths were during big rebellions and the irish yes but that's because of continuous resistance

    • @conallmclaughlin4545
      @conallmclaughlin4545 Рік тому

      @@Crimsrn here is an example of that continuous resistance, my parents (and am not old lol I'm 42) had to go on protest marches. The reason? They were not allowed to vote.
      Now imagine that situation in England... Then imagine there's a protest in your town or city. The army is sent in and shoots 26 people.. Including children. Oh but yeah sorry for resisting

  • @norwegianwood7564
    @norwegianwood7564 Рік тому +2

    Maybe it would be helpful if the States (and I mean the 50 STATES!) think about their curriculum in history....that would help to improve the image that we Europeans have about Americans when it comes to their knowledge in history (and other subjects) and their own history BEFORE 1776...Really. These are things you also learn in Germany in history classes.

  • @seansmith445
    @seansmith445 Рік тому +4

    There was more to the American Revolution than the issue of taxation without representation.The Americans didn't want a central bank bleeding them dry. But that issue is hushed up because it still has huge relevance today.

    • @oldman1734
      @oldman1734 Рік тому +4

      Sean Smith. There is a lot more. But you don’t know about it.
      Have you heard of the Seven Year War? It was when the British who lived in Britain (as opposed to the British who lived in America) fought and PAID FOR the war to protect the colonies from French invasion.
      After that war the British who lived in Britain had an idea. They would source tea from new suppliers at a cheaper price, then add a small amount of tax. The tea would still be cheaper than before, but would compensate the British who lived in Britain for the cost of the war.
      But various smugglers of tea realised that cheaper tea could put them out of business. And it was those criminals who staged the “Boston Tea Party”.
      The small amount of tax (though the tea was cheaper) was just the excuse certain ambitious people used to start the war of independence.
      However, the American Constitution is British to its core. All the things Americans think are some how American are British.
      Free speech, elections etc etc. The only thing the Americans didn’t copy was the British attitude to slavery. Slavery hadn’t existed in England since the late ten hundreds. It did continue to exist in some British colonies until 1833. But then banned. Much of British colonial policies was about ending slavery.

    • @seansmith445
      @seansmith445 Рік тому

      @@oldman1734 The American constitution is likely inspired from the Magna Carta.

    • @oldman1734
      @oldman1734 Рік тому

      @@seansmith445. Yes that in 1215, plus a lot more. First Parliament 1265, elections every three years 1688, which included everything you might think of as American.

    • @Crimsrn
      @Crimsrn Рік тому

      don't forget americans wanting to expand west of the appalachians to destroy native way of life and settle, which was forbidden by the british

    • @marycarver1542
      @marycarver1542 9 місяців тому

      Should be remembered it was British settlers themselves that withdrew, at the time they WERE the Americans !

  • @allowedeagle3263
    @allowedeagle3263 3 місяці тому

    reason the empire broke up was hugely impacted by both world wars and britain wanting to help other countries rather than to rule and exploit them so most of our colonies were given independence by the british and instead of leaving most colonies in worse positions after colonisation we helped them and made their development much faster, this also included the machinery and infrastructure etc we left behind and gave.

  • @HaurakiVet
    @HaurakiVet 5 місяців тому

    I have a book, called "Britain Overseas" written nearly 100 years ago which clarifies some of the points raised. It focuses on what is often called the second Empire which was unlike the first, which essentially was established to facilitate trade at a great advantage to Britain and, as in the case of America and later Australia, to provide somewhere to dump its undesirables and convicts.
    The second Empire placed more emphasis on spreading the British way of life and the Christian religion. Many (sometimes referred to as the "white" colonies, having a population with European majority ) became self governing within the Empire, initially having power only for internal matters and later fully self governing within the Commonwealth. Examples of these are Canada, Australia and New Zealand. New Zealand differs a little from other colonies in that it was not claimed by Britain but power of governance was ceded to Britain by the local Maori and they became British citizens with full rights as such.

  • @lindylou7853
    @lindylou7853 Рік тому +14

    We had a close economic empire. Then the Commonwealth. Then we had our heads turned because General De Gaulle wouldn’t let us join his European club. So, we dropped Canada, Australia and New Zealand and co in favour of people who’d snubbed us or tried to kill us. It took us a while to rediscover why we’d fought with them so many years.

    • @Drobium77
      @Drobium77 Рік тому

      the eu continues to stab us in the back

  • @juliemerrifield6818
    @juliemerrifield6818 Рік тому +3

    Wow Ryan !!!!!! Really?????? I do enjoy watching you, but this one threw me totally. Scary that you knew none of this.....we all know the US education system is not the best, but WOW !!!! It does however help us to understand a little better the strange goings on there. Cudos to you for at least being curious enough to want to learn. Love from Oz

  • @johnaquillo3397
    @johnaquillo3397 Рік тому +1

    The Brits also started the Industrial Revolution, for example they had steam power first and invented the steam train (look it up). It all fell apart during WW2 and after when basically Britain got bombed to bits by the Germans and went into HUGE debt to the US for decades. It was way too expensive to maintain such an empire and so bit by bit they either let independence movements have their way or they left asap. Out of the British Empire we now have the Commonwealth of Nations (it used to called the British Commonwealth). You can look that up in Wikipedia if your interested. Cheerio.

  • @Artegel5
    @Artegel5 Рік тому

    Tere are currently 56 countries in the Commonwealth. Every 4 years, just like the the olimpics , games occur where these countries particapate.

  • @maxxie84
    @maxxie84 2 місяці тому

    Technically in Britain what happened is that colonisation took place as the crown giving its permission for "companies" to "operate" on behalf of the crown, meaning some military was deployed, but the vast majority of Britton were not directly operating in the military or under the crown. Again, I am not an historian at all so I might have misunderstood things, please feel free to correct me

  • @MrJamesr007
    @MrJamesr007 Рік тому +1

    At the end of WW2, the labour party was elected partially on the promise that give independence to it's empire, focusing on India in particular. This was also coupled with the fact that Britian was almost bankrupt after the war and didn't want to spend money defending the empire as well as The USA using it's economic control of post war Britian to effectively take control of some of the British empire for itself.

    • @marycarver1542
      @marycarver1542 9 місяців тому +1

      And America ONLY entered the war against the Nazis, when it was, itself, attacked at Pearl Harbour!
      All those Hollywood films depicting America as the heroes, when they only came in toward the end
      are an insult, not only to the UK, and its Commonwealth, but are a totally false account !

  • @ttyler2222
    @ttyler2222 Рік тому +3

    Because ships sink… that will stay with me.

  • @mammilade9707
    @mammilade9707 Рік тому

    There were, among other things, carrier pigeons for communication. The governors themselves decided how to proceed. Anything that strengthened the crown and increased profits was permitted.

  • @maxxie84
    @maxxie84 2 місяці тому

    On an historical note: A huge part of the "British Empire" was gained after winning the 7 years war against France.

  • @jang3412
    @jang3412 Рік тому

    Ah Canada. Try looking up General Wolfe and his strategy when it came to Canada. He was a hero of mine back at school in the early 50s.

  • @kevingrant7098
    @kevingrant7098 Рік тому +2

    It’s like Amazon with guns

  • @FozzyZ28
    @FozzyZ28 Рік тому +1

    I love how you called them pirate ships.... 😂👌

    • @gillcawthorn7572
      @gillcawthorn7572 Рік тому

      The Royal Navy rules with regard to how the Captains treated those of other nations was very strict

  • @jerbil9353
    @jerbil9353 Рік тому +1

    If the extent of the British Empire in the 1930s surprises you, did you know that it wasn't until the 1990s that we gave back Hong Kong to China?

  • @marycarver1542
    @marycarver1542 9 місяців тому +1

    Great Britain "ruled" India for 200 years, and even today, especially today, it remains very British.

  • @oliversherman2414
    @oliversherman2414 Рік тому +5

    Fun fact: Britain still controls 14 overseas territories (areas far from the British Isles still under British control). I recently moved to southern Spain from the UK and I happen to live only 20 minutes away from Gibraltar, a British overseas territory

    • @neuralwarp
      @neuralwarp Рік тому +3

      "Controls" is the wrong word. The UK govt doesn't control anyone. All the remaining dependencies have their own parliaments. 15 countries share our same King.

    • @oliversherman2414
      @oliversherman2414 Рік тому +1

      @@neuralwarp the overseas territories aren't directly under British control but they aren't exactly independent either

  • @stephenhodgson3506
    @stephenhodgson3506 Рік тому

    A couple of point sthat didn't get mentioned;
    1) During the American War of Independence the British Navy was largely confined to the West Indies by choice. At the time one of the most valuable commodities in the world was sugar. The British believed that if they used their navy to help squash that war that their sugar producing colonies would be at risk. So rather than blockade the Colonies ports they largely left them unguarded.
    2) The greatest danger to the Empire's expansion were the powerful European nations. To ensure that they were otherwise occupied Britain regularly stirred up trouble on Continental Europe so that the powerful European nations spent more time fighting each other rather than stopping the Empire from expansion. Occasionally things went wrong and Britain had to help in the fighting for one side or the other but in large the policy worked. It was quite easy to do because those powerful European nations were ruled by monarchs who often had large egos that could be easily manipulated.

  • @gamingtonight1526
    @gamingtonight1526 Рік тому +1

    Britain now has the Commonwealth... Without those Commonwealth nations fighting for Britain, before America entered the war, Germany would have taken over the UK, leaving the U.S. with no European foothold. The Battle of Britain had Canadian, Indian, Australian, South African and other nationality pilots that all helped win the Battle of Britain, keeping Germany out!

  • @TicketyBoo.
    @TicketyBoo. Рік тому +1

    What happened was the second world war. Although ultimately victorious, Britain and the then empire countries all suffered great losses. After the war rebuilding the homeland was the priority for most and there was no desire in Britain to fight requests for independence from those who had sacrificed so much to help with the war effort. Many of the countries that wanted independence were given it through peaceful diplomatic agreement. But, as the empire declined, the British commonwealth was established and much of the trade and goodwill with these nations was maintained.

  • @francebread8947
    @francebread8947 Рік тому +3

    The colonies of the British empire had viceroys that governed the colonies.

  • @maxxie84
    @maxxie84 2 місяці тому

    Also, I don't pretend to know how things happened, but the way we learn it in France (which means probably to take with a pinch of salt) but apparently in France, when arriving to a place, we tried to provide citizenship to the people, build schools and "educate" (how terrible as it may be) the populations, for assimilation in the empire. From the videos I have seen around North America, the indian tribes there were pretty happy to deal with the French and were not happy about having to deal with the British after they took over following the 7 years war. But again it does not mean that it went all beautifully and I am pretty sure there are some massive holes in what we learn at school...

  • @malcolmharris3916
    @malcolmharris3916 Рік тому

    Ryan, your thirst for knowledge about the world, and it seems for the U.K. and Europe in general, is utterly infectious.
    I am, as a Brit, completely hooked. Thank you!

  • @crabstubular3251
    @crabstubular3251 Місяць тому

    How do you think ships work lad?

  • @dawnhollified2482
    @dawnhollified2482 Рік тому +1

    Most of these countries are still part of the common wealth.

  • @peterzimmer9549
    @peterzimmer9549 Рік тому +1

    The British had more ships than everyone else combined.

  • @huntleywhufc
    @huntleywhufc Рік тому +1

    It's like a island? Really I hadn't noticed that I live on a island, I find it frightening how little most Americans know about the rest of the world.

  • @MrPastaTube1
    @MrPastaTube1 Рік тому

    Europe was thousands of years ahead in civilizational developement. So we had technology and a highly differentiated society to basically conquer any underdeveloped native chieftan society we met.

  • @danielferguson3784
    @danielferguson3784 Рік тому

    It was the losses & cost of two world wars which led to the breakup of the British Empire. Since then many former British Empire states have gained independence, though most joined the Commonwealth. Canada has always been British since the wars against the French there (which prevented France from taking the later US lands from the British colonists/ Americans). Australia & New Zealand are also
    British Dominion territories, like Canada, independent but still recognising the Monarch of UK as their Head Of State (with each having a British Governor General representing the Sovereign). India claimed independence in 1947, but negotiations could not stop it splitting into the two states of India & Pakistan, with massive loss of life through Hindu versus Islamic 'ethnic cleansing' as soon as the British left.
    Most former Empire territories negotiated for independence amicably with Britain & joined the Commonwealth, a free association of countries for mutual assistance in trade etc. Britain's last Colony was Hong Kong, returned to China in c1992, setting it the bussiness model which is making it prosperous today. 'Made in China' used to be 'Made in Hong Kong'.

  • @earlguest2224
    @earlguest2224 Рік тому

    Ryan (nice Welsh name btw!) ... you have heard of / or seen, HMS Victory, haven't you?

    • @eddhardy1054
      @eddhardy1054 2 місяці тому

      Welsh...or Irish?🤔

    • @earlguest2224
      @earlguest2224 2 місяці тому

      @@eddhardy1054 'celtic' - both!

    • @eddhardy1054
      @eddhardy1054 2 місяці тому

      @@earlguest2224 Sorry mate but it's definitely Irish not Welsh. You saying it's Celtic and therefore both makes as much sense as me saying Sven is a nice English name because English and Danish are both Germanic. Nice try though.

    • @earlguest2224
      @earlguest2224 2 місяці тому

      @@eddhardy1054 Ryan Giggs - Am not a name expert ... Some Welsh/Irish/Scottish words are IDENTICAL ... you are Celtic (and know your Celtic languages) yes?

    • @eddhardy1054
      @eddhardy1054 2 місяці тому

      @@earlguest2224 No I'm English not Irish or Welsh...but here's the thing, you seem to be using people's first names as a guide which isn't very helpful since they can be given to children at random (for instance: my friend Mark isn't Roman, my Dad Frank wasn't French, the footballer Ian Wright isn't Scots or Irish). A far better system is to look at surnames and Ryan is definitely Irish. Can we let it go now?

  • @psilocyble3053
    @psilocyble3053 Рік тому +1

    Britain gave a lot of it's wealth to the USA in order to fund the war effort in WW1 and 2. USA was providing ammunition etc.

  • @trevorveail
    @trevorveail 2 місяці тому

    As an Englishman I am glad to have ruled over rtheb greatest empire ever known. This small Island has the greatest history in the world.

  • @narlycat
    @narlycat Рік тому +2

    You know that the British lost a few million men fighting the Germans in 2 World Wars. The First World War from 1914 to 1918. Then World War 2 from 1939 to 1945. Britain had to retreat from their World empire to defend the homeland especially in the 2nd World War. Especially in 1940 the Germans were bombing Britain and fighting an air campaign overhead.

    • @kyle381000
      @kyle381000 Рік тому +2

      Actually, British losses in two World Wars were approximately 1.5 million.

  • @moloney118
    @moloney118 2 місяці тому

    After WW1, we couldn't afford the upkeep of monitoring.
    Then WW2, and nations wanted independence.
    The Queen signed the deals for their independence.
    Historically the country Britain invaded took a while to realise, then had to fight them out.
    India, Ireland America etc

  • @wildgoose5964
    @wildgoose5964 Рік тому +1

    They made them an offer they couldn't refuse.

  • @user-ds3id9kz4e
    @user-ds3id9kz4e 11 місяців тому

    The Balfour conference was when countries such as Canada , South Africa etc decided to break away from the British Empire .. the name was. Hanged to British Commonwealth..

  • @kieranburge2502
    @kieranburge2502 Рік тому

    lol you use flies as boxing practice too

  • @leebearfield1405
    @leebearfield1405 Рік тому

    There was public demand to decolonise and also the cost of 2 world wars accelerated this process. Britain was heavily indebted to the USA after WW2 as well and the USA put pressure on to decolonise. This was largely done by the 1960's.

  • @CorinneDunbar-ls3ej
    @CorinneDunbar-ls3ej 11 місяців тому

    They missed Gibraltar, which gave us eyes and ears over so much trade in the Mediterranean and North Africa.
    Of the 22 countries we never got round to invading at some point, I can't understand why we never invaded Sweden.......🤔🇬🇧

  • @MedicJR
    @MedicJR Рік тому

    17:50 Events after WW2

  • @Fmoranable
    @Fmoranable Рік тому +1

    Do some on Ireland 😁

  • @tonyeden2944
    @tonyeden2944 6 місяців тому

    Steve, I forgot to mention Austria. The Austro-Hungarian Empire included part of Ktaly, all of the Balkans and more.

  • @ryttyr14
    @ryttyr14 10 місяців тому

    I really don't know anything about it other than what I'm saying right now but I believe that there at some point was a treaty or something like that written that forced all European colonies in Africa to withdraw and hand back control to the African population, which is likely how the British Empire lost its African colonies. It's kinda odd that I've not heard more about this considering that Europe at one point controlled all of Africa with the exception of Ethiopia so whatever forced them to relinquish their colonies must have been a HUGE deal!