Brit Reacts To WHEN PLANES ALMOST CRASH!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 12 чер 2024
- Brit Reacts To THE TEN WORST PLANE NEAR MISSES
If You Would Like To Support The Channel: www.paypal.me/kabsayofe
/ kabirconsiders
10 Worst Plane Near Misses
Hi everyone, I’m Kabir and welcome to another episode of Kabir Considers! In this video I’m Going to React To THE TEN WORST PLANE NEAR MISSES
Follow me on social media:
Instagram: @kabirayofe
Twitter: @kabirconsiders
Email me for business inquiries:
kabirconsiders@yahoo.com
If you would like to send me anything, my PO Box address is;
Kabir Considers
PO Box 5026
Hornchurch
RM12 9JG
United Kingdom
___________________________________________________________________________
COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
FAIR USE ACT
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
ALL RIGHTS BELONG TO THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS
Most of these are examples of excellent pilots, battling confusing ATC or crosswinds,or whatever
I agree... "It's overloaded!" The hell it is. The original video is clickbait.
Same. I miss those shiny metallic American Airlines planes. It gives that 20th century retro space-age look still retained in things like the NYC subway cars, Chicago L, etc. The new look of AA planes is a more flat, modern look, but I used to love looking out the airport windows and see how shiny the older AA planes got when sunlight hit them. It stood out.
Three-engine jets were an economy measure. They used less fuel than four engine jets. At one time, two engine jets were not allowed to fly over water, except for relatively short distances. Solution : Three engines. There were three relatively common triple jets, The British Hawker-Siddley Trident, The Lockheed L-1011, and the McDonnell-Douglas DC-10. Most of them have disappeared from commercial passenger service, but they're still used in cargo and military versions. e.g. the US Air Force operated the KC-10 tankers for aerial refueling. The last of the KC-10s is scheduled to be retired later this year. Oh, How could I have forgotten the most famous : The Boeing 727 !!
I was marshaling in a 767 a few years back during a snow storm. As they made their final turn before the gate they fishtailed. The wing came right over me and I was about 10 ft from the engine. It was the most terrified I have ever been.
One of my younger brothers is an air traffic controller and yes it is one of the most stressful jobs there is. They're understaffed and over worked. My brother has had mandatory overtime since he started about 5 years ago and works a minimum of 80 hours a week.
Some airports are so busy that aircraft are taking off between landings. Several airports have more than 5,000 flight operations per day and if a pilot delays his take off by 30 seconds he can force up to 10 aircraft out of sequence and position. In the case at 1:27 theaircraft other group was slow to respond making it necessary for the landing plane to abort and go around for another attempt at landing. Chicago O'Hara has up to 60 takeoffs and landings per hour per runway. That's 5,760 flights per day for 4 runways. Atlanta has over 9,000 flights per day and 286,000 passengers per day.
Every aircraft type has a max takeoff weight. When planes are too close to the max limits, panes can and do crash. I was on a 737 once and there were too many people in one area of the plane and every passenger was told to more around the plane to equal balance throughout the aircraft. Weight is so important to planes that all luggage weighed. There is even a calculation the airlines use to estimate the weight of all the passengers as well.
Most of these are just normal landings with the runways in awkward places and the other ones are good pilots in bad windy weather situations.The three engine are normally on international cargo plains.
those aircraft with the third engine were actually quite common thirty years ago. if i'm not mistaken, the one shown looks like a DC 10. they're a bit older now, but there are still dozens in service for freight carriers.
3-engine planes used to be common. Before Boeing bought them, McDonald-Douglas used to make 3-engine airliners like DC-9s and DC-10s.
The 3 engine jets also known as ( trijets ) were more common around the mid to late 70's - early 2000's. The Lockheed L-1011 is another example of a 3 engine jet. The DC-10, MD-11 have the center engine mounted straight through the tail, and the L-1011 has the center engine in the rear of the fuselage with an S duct for the air intake on top. Very few 3 engine jets are still flying for cargo, and only 1 L-1011 still being used.
Was just about to mention a DC-10. But you said it better.
Hi Kabir! There are different engine configurations on aircraft. There's one, I don't know the model, that has an engine mounted atop the fusilage as well as two more engines mounted on either side of the rear part of the fusilage.
The passengers were still on that Delta that had an engine fire on the runway ready for takeoff. The pilot would have shut down the affected engine and waited for the fire department.
There is a huge shortage of Air Traffic Controllers. It’s horrible.
I’m from the US , CT actually. I just watched part of a news clip saying an accident almost happened & the shortage of workers was the reason.
10:38 Tri-jets were pretty popular in the 70s and 80s, but planes with more reliable and efficient engines have replaced them. This plane was likely a passenger jet that was converted to cargo, as cargo jets are usually older than passenger airliners.
Also the addition of ETOPS certifying two engine aircraft
You should listen to MENTOUR PILOT. He tells you about airliners that crash or nearly crash. He also has an episode, CAN A PASSENGER LAND A 737, and he goes step through step how to land a Boeing 737.
Love Mentor Pilot!!
Or Green Dot!
Engine placement depends on the manufacture and age of the plane.
The Mcdonnell-Douglas DC-10 and MD-11 and Boeing 727 had an aft-mounted engine. They were used as both passenger and freight aircraft. . .
4:50 As I recall this pilot lost her job because she was either goofing off or did something risky and you can see the results.
One of the biggest causes of airplane accidents is wind sheer and that occurs most often at takeoff and landing.
3:10 Yes, there are real planes. This was at an airshows with stunt pilots so it's unfair for it to even be on this list since it's not an almost accident it's intentional.
The C5 Galaxy is the largest cargo plane in the U.S. Air Force, it's a slow and lumbering giant. The 3 engine job is a McDonnell Douglass DC 9 or a DC 10 aircraft manufactured back in the 70s and 80s.
I work near a small airport that gives flying lessons and have witnessed a few close ones.
10:50 Pilots use landing gear in addition to flaps/slats to slow down to land. I'm sure the pilots were saying, "Why aren't we slowing like we should? Uh....landing gear?"
The third one at 2:00 wasn't coming in too low; that's how they all approach that runway; that's why there were already people around with their cameras out to record it.
Takeoffs are optional, landings aren't. . .
5:37 that would be one hell of a photo to get if you're lucky enough
You have to watch MENTOUR PILOT. You will be shocked and amazed
Check out the videos of planes landing and taking off at Princess Juliana International Airport on the Dutch side of the Island of Saint Martin. Daredevils gather on Maho Beach to experience the jet blast. In 2017, A Woman from New Zealand woman died as a result of injuries when she was blown into a concrete barrier by jet blast.
They Have A Video On The Lockheed-Martin C-5M Super Galaxy!! It's The US Air Force Strategic Heavy Lift Aircraft!!
Some of those videos are weather related, and the skilled ATC and pilots are the only reason the planes landed safely. Others are runways that are just plain dangerous, and only the most skilled pilots can land on them, with highly skilled ATC guiding them.
There is a massive shortage of air traffic controllers and pilots though, which is causing them to lower the industry standards in order to fill seats. There have been many reports coming out showing how many crashes and near misses are due to underqualified ATC and pilots. Older ATC and pilots are retiring because they are overworked and underpaid (not to mention terrible passengers), and the new people coming in just don't have the experience that apparently has given us safer air travel in the past. Hopefully the newer ones aren't so overworked that they leave the field, because we need them getting in the hours that give them the knowledge to make air travel safe down the road.
I think the tower is in charge of runways and all. Air traffic wouldn't know the airport like the tower does.
That movie was united arline flight 32 you have to see it it happened a long time ago it's a sad movie
You don’t remember DC10s and L1011s? I’m a lot older than you!
You’ve never seen. MD-11
React to "Tin Can"
Damn that jet didn’t smoothly land…. It bounced onto that runway. While the pilot is coming in for “landing” 🛬 (I cannot believe that at least one tire did not pop) and then announcing 30 seconds before…”ladies and gentlemen, I should probably announce this is my first time flying a plane! So good luck to all of us!”