Gershwin: Rhapsody in Blue ∙ hr-Sinfonieorchester ∙ Michel Camilo ∙ Andrés Orozco-Estrada
Вставка
- Опубліковано 12 вер 2016
- George Gershwin:
Rhapsody in Blue ∙
hr-Sinfonieorchester - Frankfurt Radio Symphony ∙
Michel Camilo, Klavier ∙
Andrés Orozco-Estrada, Dirigent ∙
Open Air Konzert ∙
17. August 2016 ∙
Weseler Werft, Frankfurt am Main ∙
Website: www.hr-sinfonieorchester.de
Facebook: / hrsinfonieorchester
I’m addicted to Gershwin’s music. Can’t sleep early enough.
you´re all over classical music youtube lmao
For those of you that do not know who the pianist is, this is Michel Camilo. He is probably one (1) of the greatest living Latin jazz pianists of his epoch. He has his own style, some will love it and some will hate it. Regardless of whichever camp you fall into, please keep in mind that the Frankfort Radio Symphony Orchestra and Andrés Orozco-Estrada could have had any pianist in the world play with them and they chose him.
The following is probably, in part, why they chose him:
"His extensive discography has been recognized with a Grammy award, an Emmy award, three Latin Grammy awards, JazzWeek's Artist of The Year award, four Grammy award nominations and two Premios de la Música (Spain), plus several Premios Casandra and El Soberano awards (Dominican Republic)."
A mi entender Michel Camilo es un pianista único en su destreza estilo y forma. qué ha demostrado Qué puede ejecutar dominar todos los estándares modo y colores de una forma indescriptible en ese mundo infinito.. de conocimiento Cómo es la música. felicidades hermano desde la República Dominicana.
mejor interpretacioon que he escuchado ,por primera vez escucho jazz ,sentimiento y virtuosismo reunidos
Bravo maestro Orozco ...mis respetos y admiration desde Mexico
Remember, the Rhapsody was an experiment in modern music so the spin that the pianist put on the pierce was not so bad. And anyway, it was a Summer outside concert and people were partying so lighten up.
Bravo Michel, bravo!
Como de costumbre, tu técnica impecable, fina interpretación de un bello clásico.
Exito total!
pero si falla más que una escopeta de feria...
From the DOMINICAN REPUBLIC TO THE WORLD!
Es una delicia escuchar esta música y gran composiciones
EXCELLENT!!!!! What a FANTASTIC PIANIST!!! Danke shon.
1:00 funny, yet great way to do the trill!!
La cadenza está genial 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Wow? Congratulations. Great Fisrt Clarinet Solo. Bravíssimo Piano Solo. Wonderful. Greetings from Brazil. Santos City. São Paulo State. Bravo Maestro! Success. Ol@v♡ ⚘
Well i never knew Silvio Berlussconi could play Piano Bravo !!
spectacular!
Michel Camilo.Es un pianista.Lo que ejecuta es maravilloso.Solo hay que escucharlo,dejarse llevar y nuestro espíritu recibirá un mimo.Placer de los Dioses.Un abrazo desde Uruguay.
참 좋습니다!
I liked the interpretation, it was different😃
идеально!
it shows the years michel camilo spend at juliar school of music bravo
How many years? References simply state that he studied there, but give no information on just what he studied, or for how long, or for how successfully. It's easy to say he was at Julliard, but that means nothing in itself.
@@bryangl1 HE studied with jacob leteiner at juilliard and used to practice classical music for 10 hrs a day liszt, beethoven etc. Then at nights he played at jazz clubs.
Großartig
I wish I had hair like Michel Camilo"s!
Michel camilo no es pianista clásco ni de jazz ..pero lo curioso y que no entienden los puristas de la musica que a pesar de no estar en esa corriente musical hace un esfuerzo y la interpreta muy a su estilo ...gracias michel eres un gran pianista ...
eine hervorragende Veranstaltung, 👍aber wieso nimmt man so einen Pianisten? 👎
usually love michel's work, but this is "off spec". except for the opening clarinet part, Yuja Wang owns this piece.
Gershwin was a genius ............
Indeed
I found it interesting that the trumpeters were playing piston-valved trumpets rather than the rotary-valved trumpets that I usually associate with German orchestras. Was that done because of this particular piece of music?
Englisch: There are several reasons for that, I suspect. On the one hand, the HR Symphony Orchestra in the Blechsatz is staffed by HR (Hessischer Rundfunk) musicians from the HR Big Band. Are publicly legally employed by the broadcasters and are added to the roster. Thus, you play the popular jazz trumpets formerly American design. On the other hand, grand piano trumpets are more attributable to the Vienna School. Austrian traditional orchestras are increasingly playing because of the soft response. For Gershwin, the tone is more aggressive in approach. I am not a trumpeter but a trombonist. Here it is similar. Bach instruments are softer in the beginning and you can dive into the sound. With KING trombones (American style and pure for Big Band), the tone is formed or formed just behind the mouthpiece and not just shortly before the funnel, as in classical orchestra style. For KING jazz instruments, at least for trombones, I have to hit the same note, otherwise I - lost for everyone audibly. I suppose this is similar with trumpets ... Deutsch: Das hat durchaus mehrere Gründe, vermute ich. Zum einen ist das HR Symphonie-Orchester im Blechsatz mit den HR (Hessischer-Rundfunk) Musikern aus der HR-Big Band besetzt. Sind ja öffentlich rechtlich von den Rundfunkanstalten fest angestellt und werden vom Dienstplan hinzugenommen. Somit spielen Sie die gängigen Jazz-Trompeten vormals amerikanischer Bauart. Andererseits sind Flügeltrompeten mehr der Wiener-Schule zuzuordnen. Österreichische traditionelle Orchester spielen Sie vermehrt wegen der weichen Ansprache. Bei Gershwin ist der Ton im Ansatz aggressiver zu spielen. Ich bin kein Trompeter sondern Posaunist. Hier ist es ähnlich. Bach Instrumente sind weicher im Ansatz und man kann sich in den Ton hineinmogeln. Bei KING Posaunen (amerikanische Bauart und rein für Big Band) entsteht oder Formt sich der Ton gleich hinter dem Mundstück und nicht erst kurz vor dem Trichter, wie bei Klassik-Orchester-Bauart. Bei KING-Jazz-Instrumenten, zumindest bei Posaunen muss ich gleich den Ton treffe, sonst habe ich - für alle hörbar - verloren. Ich vermute dies ist bei Trompeten ähnlich gelagert ...
My parents had a copy of George Gershwin playing Rhapsody in Blue which was played often in our house. The only thing I can think is The Pianist was drunk. I just couldn't believe you could get away with it. Inexcusable. Should never have been put on UA-cam.
Ever hear of Jazz? Gershwin's original was called a classical jazz fusion, or similar
@@charlesdavenport6094 pay no mind to the close minded ignoramuses.
@@charlesdavenport6094 It's a "classical" work with jazz influences. The pianist is expected to play the notes in the score, but with slight timing differences that bend the musical line. And even if you accept adlibbing some of the notes, jazz still requires the changed notes have musical integrity. Here, no matter how you look at it, the wrong notes are wrong notes. Gershwin never played the work as a jazz work (which he was capable of doing) but played the notes as written.
@@bryangl1 I didn't pick up any wrong notes, but overall it's a revelation
@@charlesdavenport6094 There are quite a few wrong notes - most are buried in fast passages. There are places where in fast arpeggio-like breaks he just grabs a handful of notes 2 or 3 times over that aren't the written notes and don't make sense as jazz breaks. The conductor's tempi also seem a bit erratic. It's almost as if the conductor and pianist couldn't agree on how to approach the work. Camilo is a skilled pianist in his field, and Orozco-Estrafa is highly skilled in his field, but on this day, it's almost as if there was no rehearsal. The pianist almost sounds as if he was drunk.
11:16 好き
Grandissima tecnica e trascendenza (anche se un po' sporchino)
Beautiful performance....bur this urban views are distracting and not necessary!
prachtig❕
alleen één smartelijke dissonant:
geen fade-out...
he is like russian gershwin :>
👯♀️👯♀️👯♀️
Hmmmmm ... no banjo?
Something very off with pianist in this performance. Plays way too fast, not enough emotion, missing/stumbling over notes at times notes, off tempo etc. Orchestra sounds great!
Too many notes?
Winds and Brass outstanding
At United, we're connecting people, uniting the world and doing it safely. From all of us, thank you and enjoy your flight!
Die Klarinette am Anfang klingt bezaubernd. Aber das Soloklavier ist nicht so charmant.
ミスタッチが多いのを
速度を上げることで誤魔化そうとしているのがよくわかる
Der Orchesterteil ist gut, der Pianoteil einfach schlecht! Der Pianist ist zwar technisch perfekt, aber er zieht die Läufe so schnell runter, dass es einfach matschig klingt, und rennt teilweise noch dem Orchester davon.
Man merkt leider, dass Michel Camilo kein klassischer Pianist ist... Er ist meiner Meinung nach der beste Pianist im Latin Jazz, aber für die Rhapsody wäre ein klassischer Pianist besser geeignet
Einmal mehr eine wirklich sehr gute Leistung des Orchesters und des Dirigenten. Diese Kombination passt ausgesprochen gut. Man merkt, dass Andres Orozco-Estrada und das Orchester auf einer Wellenlänge zusammenarbeiten. Ich bin auch immer wieder von den kurzen Solopassagen der Orchestermusiker beeindruckt, die technisch und interpretatorisch wirklich ausgesprochen bemerkenswert sind. Leider verdirbt hier die Klavier-Performance die Aufnahme nahezu komplett. Michel Camilo spielt nichts sauber aus und versucht die (leider permanent auftertenden) technischen Unzulänglichkeiten durch übertriebene Geschwindigkeit und Lautstärke zu überdecken. Zudem sorgt sein überzogener und dilettantischer Pdealgebrauch dafür, dass ein Klavier-Klangbrei entsteht.
While there is always room for "interpretation" in this piece, there are far too many places where syncopations and or timings are just wrong. Add in to that the absolute plethora of wrong and brushed notes one wonders how this pianist gets any work. In a word, no matter how you approach it, an absolutely terrible performance by a "pianist" who should not be on the stage.
Michel Camilo is one of the greatest latin jazz players today. Why would you wonder how he gets work? Also why would you put pianist in quotation marks? Are you seriously implying michel camilo is not a pianist? Thats really stupid of you if thats the case.
@@micah5898 I think my comment already answers your question. He may have some ability to play the piano, but the playing here is so bad a very large number of amateurs could give a better performance than this. If you know so little about music, or at least this composition in particular, that you can't hear the very large number of mistakes etc in this performance, then you are in no position to criticize. [I am not referring to the orchestra which is impeccable as always.]
Exactly what I was thinking. Probably the worst performance I've heard of this great piece.
I agree. Even though I don't know this piece very well, I feel like the jazz soul is lacking.
i peed
lol, what?
Will mich @notaire2 anschliessen. Die Clarinette ist perfekt, aber das Piano wirkt reichlichgrob und "gehaemmert".
pablo cramer ich finde das Klavier sehr gut gespielt
Mmmmmmmm eeeeehhhhhhh...está claro que Michel Camilo no es un pianista clásico.
Frankfurt Radio Symphony Orchestra Sound is so good. The tempo of the conductor is also very good. But michel camilo's playing is terrible. too many miss touches and Tempo is from Latin America, so it's inconsistent even though it can be a bit faster. In addition, he skipped or changed the notes of the original song too much. he didn't practice or seems to lack the ability. Please look at the conductor and listen to the orchestra. I think extant who can best play the songs from Gershwin jazz...pianist who I think is a Marian Petrescu. Wouldn't it be a similar level performance to Marcus Roberts?
hahaha...lack the ability? are you aware whom are you talking about? Michel Camilo! Take a look at Caribe from him. Rhapsody in blue is just a warm up exercise for a pianist like this! Camilo is not a classical pianist, so don´t criticize him under this point of view. His technical skills are far beyond than most of the living pianists
@@amadeusmozzart If you are correct, and I emphasize the IF as you seem to have no ability you judge, why so many wrong notes, why so many brushed notes, why so many timing errors? Even if sight-reading, a pianist of any real skill would be playing very much better then this. You obviously normally hear him playing music where you can bluff your way though. Not so here where he needs to play the note as composed - a feat for which he shows little talent. Embarrasaing for the fine orchestra.
you are obviously divorced from reality sir.
@@bryangl1 bluff your way through? you are out of your mind as well.
@@sampowellmusic Hi Sam, my comments relate to this performance, and it's clear I am in the majority in claiming this is a bad performance from the pianist. If he is skilled in jazz playing, he will be in the habit of improvising much of the playing - not bound to follow the score in detail (in fact. much of his usual playing is likely to be from charts rather than scores.) Interpretation of classical music (although on the fringe of "classical", this is a work that must be approached with respect for the score - with some freedoms in timing where a jazz feel is needed etc, but no freedom on the notes). If you are unable to hear the wrong and brushed notes, you obviously don't know the score, or the way it should be played. You are entitled to your opinion, but don't insult the many people who have commented on the flaws in the playing. comments from people who clearly know more about this work than you do. I am a pianist, but VERY definitely amateur. so I can only stumble through playing this, which I do for my own amusement. But, from my attempts to play it at least I'm very familiar with the score, and listening to this while following it from the score makes me feel Camilo should be too embarassed to present his playing to a piblic (and paying - presumably) audience.
Dear George, please accept our apologies for the HACK "pianist" who confirmed The Rhapsody was lights years beyond his skill level. The cadence in F#m was so bad...Send the authorities to Gershwin's to make sure he didn't roll out of his casket.
I invite anyone who hasn't heard a concert pianist perform this piece, to please check that out...Better yet, listen to Gershwin and/or Oscar Levant play the piece.
Orchestra was good but the piano playing was simply terrible. So many mistakes, awful rhythm, and not counting the “bad” interpretation in my view which is of course subjective. Especially when you're used to hearing Yuja Wang's flawless performance.
Too many wrong notes...
Qué falta de respeto de pianista. Demasiados errores solo por lucirse. Hay niños que lo interpretan mejor.
I prefer Lang Lang's version.
I prefer United’s version
I haven't a clue why the Frankfurt Radio Symphony Orchestra, it's board members, and a conductor as brilliant as Andres Orozco-Estrada, would waste their time on a jazz show piece like Rhapsody In Blue. They have dedicated themselves to bringing the world some of the finest performances of the greatest works of the Classical and Romantic periods today.
Don't get me wrong... I love Jazz. However, this is hardly the "soft" venue to present such a lightweight piece (and compared to the likes of Tchaikovsky, Brahms, Mozart, Shubert and, most of all, Beethoven, all of whom are at home with this orchestra and venue, Gershwin is lightweight). The musicians all look bored with the piece, there are far too many brushings on certain chords and flourishes, and the entire orchestra seems to be struggling with a form of music that is NOT what they are truly here for. The whole thing sounds slow and uninspired.
Please, Frankfurt Radio Symphony, NO MORE JAZZ.
This performance was a trainwreck.
The music not worthy of an orchestra of this caliber.
A clownish performance. Has nothing to do with Gershwin. Forget it.