Labour lifts ban on onshore wind farms | Jeremy Vine
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 жов 2024
- Keir Starmer's Energy Secretary Ed Milliband has come in swinging by repealing the ban on onshore windfarms and looking at making decisions about implementation national, not local.
Jeremy Vine on 5 is on television every weekday at 9:15am until 1:30pm on Channel 5.
Subscribe to the channel for more celebrity interviews, hot topics and debates: bit.ly/34DvAv4
Twitter: / jeremyvineon5
Facebook: / jeremyvineon5
Instagram: / jeremyvineon5
#JeremyVine #Labour #WindFarms
We have millions in Canada and they’re really expensive. Plus they can’t build enough of them for it to work the way the government expected it to.
You don’t have millions in Canada ..you have 6648 wind turbines..that supply 20% of your energy.. please stick to the facts..if you can’t..butt out.. 🥴🥴🥴🙄🙄😎
What is the point of Mike Parry . He just talks nonsense.
Both sides of opinion is important ok Der 🙄
He’s correct, they aren’t always turning and producing electricity. They aren’t green either as carbon is need to produce them, not to mention they aren’t recyclable yet
Mike Porky Parry, he was crap on Talksport too.
@@barneyrubble8590but he lies..& doesn’t have a scooby.. 🥴🥴🥴🙄😎
@@JesteR6SCDyep they are recyclable.. it’s being done in a few places around the globe..🙄🙄🤔😎
compositesuk.co.uk/composite-materials/faq/end-of-life-options/
compositesuk.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Recycling-Report-2016-Light-Background.pdf
the wind farms here in the US are beautiful and they're beneficial to our environment rather than polluting it
how much cheaper are your bills?
@@keirmitchell5560I would think quite low reductions in bills.. wind accounts only 10+% in USA.. so probably under $100 per annum.. 👍😎
Planning has been put in for wind Turbines next to Top Withern in Bronte Country 65 Turbines 150/200 meters high (THE SIZE OF BLACKPOOL TOWER) Experts say the loss of PEAT will
run into MILLIONS of TONS of lost carbon just digging the footings not counting the massive road building for installation & maintenance & will cost more than the so called saving of
cheap energy. FLOODING will also be a massive problem with the loss of peat. Private profit should NOT come before the environment.Read what all the experts say.
Should never have been banned in the first place....
I love them too! Give me wind turbines over a smog motorway or coalmine or noisy diesel engines.
The Highlands of Scotland, which suffers from amongst the highest fuel poverty and happens to be the coldest area in the UK, is fast becoming overwhelmed by wind farms.
Ironically, although the Highlands disproportionately produce power for the nation, its residents pay amongst the highest fees for electricity. As long as the energy companies remain privatised, with little external scrutiny, they will keep prices high to pay dividends to their shareholders and ignore the residents' concerns about where these wind farms are sited.
I’m having much amusement listening to this, and reading the comments.
Did people say the same about the large electric pylons that are in some people’s back gardens
We need more off shore wind farms, not on shore. Put some on shore turbines in and around London and see what the people say.
Doesn’t work like that.. obviously they get erected in windy areas.. not suburbs around major cities.. 🙄🙄🥴🥴😎
When he says “this country” I assume he is referring to the south of England.
Be great if they produced cheap energy but they Don't wind energy is the most expensive energy in the world' the truth is not hard to find' country's with the most wind farms have the most expensive electricity don't believe the hype it's a racket and you're paying for it.
get them built yesterday bring back whale oil!!!!
Green energy is the cheapest form of energy and they are very efficient.
Mike lying again.. 🥴🥴🙄🙄😎
Wind farms near me on the east coast sre hardly moving and there have been birds , mainly owls killed by these so called green alternatives 🙄
Do you know how many birds get killed by skyscrapers, and don't forget cats, should we remove them to save birds, as one skyscraper kills more birds than 100 wind turbines, and over a year cats kill 27 million birds in the UK, so I think some wind turbines are not a issue, or would you like a large nuclear power station outside your house?
@@simon-df9wh sky scrapers are useful,wind turbines are only a bit useful... they're not enough to keep power on and they are no longer used eventually and there are "graves"where they are dumped,we haven't reached being completely green yet and I have solar panels and want things to improve..with this crap weather my airing cupboard isn't "buzzing" as I would hear when the sun is out.
Sorry, they hardly move, but they kill many owls? If they're hardly moving how are they killing owls? Are they commiting suicide, throwing themselves against mainly unmoving objects?
@@vernonrabbetts wind turbines have a buzzing sound that disorientates owls( and hawks) and causes them to hit them in the dark even when not moving. As I said I live very close to 12 very large wind turbines and they do buzz..it’s horrible. They don’t last 29 years either,it’s not the answer to being “green “
20 years *
Anyone regretting voting Labour yet...
No
@@vincentblack7467 you must be kidding , they are actually working unlike the last lot who just sat around
No
No
Nope!
That guy just takes the opposite side no matter what. He is such a bell end. Wind turbines do have some problems but they do produce cheaper energy and all the commenters on here are using the same tired tropes. Just accept you have lost like we have had to with your disastrous Brexit.
I’m having much amusement listening to this, and reading the comments.