Ya Allah, help the ummah and that we only take knowledge the scholars of Ahlus sunnah, protect us against misguidance and sitting with the people of bidah
I do know that Sheikh Uthman is human and could make mistakes sometimes criticisms that are done constructively are much appreciated than destructive ones. Why is it so hard to just call him personally rather than showing the whole world all of these if you really meant well for your brother in Islam? It breaks my heart always to see that the few people who are striving hard to call towards the right path (Islam) are being tainted this way. There is always a better way to resolve these issues. I'm heart broken by these acts. May Allah guide us all!
These salafis don't mean well, they are a diseased lot with much ignorance in their hearts and minds and of the broad tradition of islamic scholarship. Their diseased methodology from their founder Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab just leads to childish egotistical refutations and fighting with other Muslims which benefits no one and in fact hurts the ummah. Follow scholars who follow a madhab in fiqh and are athari, ashari, or maturidi in aqeeda but all should stay away and approach with severe caution anyone chearleading for “salafiyyah.”
@Umer Al-badawi This sister is clearly wrong, bc one should warn people against such people but your comment is so disgusting the way ur belittling women "You are a woman, what do you know" Are you saying that women cannot possess knowledge? Allah created men and woman and didn't favor one over another May Allah forgive you
JazaakumAllahu khairan for minimising the unnecessary and keeping the refutation to brother Uthmaan short and succinct. May Allah guide us all and make us from al Tawwabeen.
I have just finished watching this video by Uthman entitled “Life of Prophet Muhammad ﷺ from Authentic Sources - Sacrifice.” He has waffled on but hasn’t given one single “Authentic Source” to back up his assertions. This is typical Uthman; he makes up stories to put Mo in a good light to make you feel sorry to get your emotions involved, but it’s all fantasies. The sad thing is you Muslims are taken in; you never ask for evidence; why? Anything to push away the doubts you have. Uthman is dishonest. RD
@@IbnAisharadiAllahHuAnha You say, “you pualians must be sad when your books synonym is contradictions.” What do you scholars say on that topic? I will leave you with a few comments from Islams most respected scholars, please consider them carefully. What do Muslims with a lot more knowledge than you say about the Bible? 1/ Muhammad 'Abduh (1849 - 1905), was an Egyptian jurist and religious scholar ... the charge of corruption of the Biblical texts makes no sense at all. It would not have been possible for Jews and Christians everywhere to agree on changing the text. Even if those in Arabia had done it, the difference between their book and those of their brothers, let us say in Syria and Europe would have been obvious...We believe that these Gospel accounts are the true Gospel. 2/ Mawlawi Muhammad Sa'id ... as God says in the beginning of the Qur'an: “And who believe in that which is revealed unto thee (Muhammad) and that which was revealed before thee, and are certain of the Hereafter. These depend on guidance from their Lord. These are the successful.” (2:4,5) ”Some Muslims imagine that the Injil is corrupted. But as far as corruption is concerned, not even one among all the verses of the Qur'an mentions that the Injil or the Tawrat is corrupted. In the concerned passages it is written that the Jews - yes the Jews, not the Christians - alter the meaning of the passages from the Tawrat while they are explaining them. At least the Christians are completely exonerated from this charge. Hence the Injil is not corrupted and the Tawrat is not corrupted. For it does not necessarily follow that these Scriptures are corrupt because of the wrong opinion of some uninformed persons. 3/ Ibn Kathir Ismail ibn Kathir =(1301-1373) was a Muslim Muhaddith (narrator), Faqīh, Mufassir, and Historian. He is the author of the most respected and widely used tafsir/ [Quoting Muhammad talking of the Jews and Christians]"David died in the midst of his friends. They were not led astray, nor changed [their books]. The Friends of Christ stayed in His ordinances and guidance for two hundred years" 4/ Sayyid Ahmad Husayn Shawkat Mirthi The ordinary Muslim people acknowledge that the Injil is the Word of God. Yet they also believe through hearsay (taqlidi 'aqida) that the Injil is corrupted, even though they cannot indicate what passage was corrupted, when it was corrupted, and who corrupted it. Is there any religious community in this world whose lot is so miserable that they would shred their heavenly Book with their own hands, and then, after restlessly patching it with sackcloth, they must throw dust in the eyes of the people? True, some religious communities change the meaning (tahrif-i ma'nawi) of their Scriptures. To say that God has taken the Injil and the Tawrat into heaven and has abrogated them is to defame and slander God. It is to pour ridicule not only upon the Qur'an but upon all the Books. Abrogation always arises because of error. Laws of earthly kingdoms are abrogated because experience has proved that they are harmful. But God makes no mistake, nor does He lack experience. 5/ Mawlawi Chirag ud-Din The Qur'an commands us to believe and to honour the previous Scriptures and apostles. According to Surah (Nisa): “O ye who believe! Believe in Allah and His messenger and the Scripture which He hath revealed unto His messenger, and the Scripture which He revealed aforetime.” (4:136) ”When, therefore, it is commanded to believe in these Holy Scriptures, why consider the study of these Scriptures reprehensible? For when the order to believe the Qur'an and the Holy Scriptures is one and the same, how can one conclude that reading the Qur'an is a meritorious act, but that reading the Holy Scriptures is a punishable offence? 6/ Abdullah Saeed A significant point of tension between today’s Muslims and the ‘People of the Book’ (Jews and Christians) is the common Muslim belief that the Jewish and Christian scriptures that exist today are corrupted and cannot be relied upon in any matters of faith, religion or law. Although this is a popular view, most classical scholars of the Qur’an were far more cautious in their understanding of Qur’anic texts on this issue. This article explores the Qur’an’s references to distortion of scriptural meaning and text, and the views of scholars, particularly Tabari, Qurtubi, Razi, Ibn Taymiyya and Qutb. Qur’anic words such as tahrif are popularly accepted today as referring to deliberate distortion of scripture; however, classical scholars have interpreted the Qur’an’s references in a number of different ways.Almost all suggested that distortion occurred mainly through interpretation and not in the text itself. Although the Qur’an refers to tahrif (distortion), it also exhibits the utmost respect for previous scriptures. Early Muslims adopted a narrow view of scripture, partly because of the nature of the Qur’an, and also in response to the more established religions of Judaism and Christianity, to assert the ‘purity’ of the Qur’an and Islam. Saeed notes that the Jewish and Christian scriptures that exist today are, according to most scholars, largely unchanged since the time of Muhammad and should be respected now as they were then
What is the problem with uthmaan faruuq? Can someone make it short for me? Sometimes it s hard to hold on the speed and understanding together sometimes…
There are saying he promotes or praises imams who support cariji revolutionary sect run by non Muslims and he promotes sofis who exaggerate status of Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him like some some she'uh did.
@@17813_ generally if someone uses the insult “madkhali” then they are khawarij. If you wanted more nuanced discussion then you should’ve started an adult discussion instead of name calling. This is your fault.
@@Scott-Eesa what is khawarij? I wanna know if you actually know what it is. And what's your evidence that generally you are a khariji if you use the word madkhali?
@@17813_ one of the definitions of khawarij is making takfir over major sins. My experience is that “madkhali” is only used by a clique of angry political radicals who want to talk against every ruler, every government. And get ready for this: The first kharajite was called so by the Prophet ﷺ because he criticized leadership! The ancestor, so to speak, of all khawarij merely committed the crime of being publicly critical. Also, such name calling is typical of angry men who have no real argument, just political rage. The evidence from the Sunnah is CLEAR: obey the rulers.
Can u share anything about that. I was recently listening to me with the impression that he follows salaf. But I can see he is with deobandi. But isit he has conference with sheikh karim zaid? Xan anyone clear things.
@@saaimgussain yeah that isn’t sufficient then you praise him specifically in public you must retract in public and clarify this is what is mentioned by the scholars
have u all refuted your mom's and dads and uncles and aunties ...brothers and sisters. leave the man alone he's calling people to Allaah and His messenger...everyone will not be perfect that's not for humans to be perfect
@@yousaf3133 go to 6th circuit court files under Islamic center of Southfield cases … he and his goons pulled of a heist of the century with lies, planting evidence to incriminate and hoodwinked the system of tagut
@@yousaf3133 what are you laughing about? You think it’s a joke what umaysan have done? Oops I forgot maybe people like you who “worship” personalities if they cut someone’s head off and they said I murdered this person you would make excuses for their crimes… I challenge you to tell umaysan and all the other goons that are with him to take the hijacking of the mosque to a scholar …. Guaranteed they would never go!!!!
I have just finished watching this video by Uthman entitled “Life of Prophet Muhammad ﷺ from Authentic Sources - Sacrifice.” He has waffled on but hasn’t given one single “Authentic Source” to back up his assertions. This is typical Uthman; he makes up stories to put Mo in a good light to make you feel sorry to get your emotions involved, but it’s all fantasies. The sad thing is you Muslims are taken in; you never ask for evidence; why? Anything to push away the doubts you have. Uthman is dishonest. RD
Actually, we don't blindly accept everything he says. AT ALL. We don't blindly accept what any scholar says. We also study and we consult texts and other sources on our own. We don't need you to tell us how to practice our religion, thank you for being so considerate. But deal with your own problems first.
Ya Allah, help the ummah and that we only take knowledge the scholars of Ahlus sunnah, protect us against misguidance and sitting with the people of bidah
Umaysan is a hypocrite. He was and is part of a scandal stealing/hijacking a masjid in Michigan… He loves getting ruling from the tagoot 6th circuit court to steal the masjid “legally
Ya Allah, help the ummah and that we only take knowledge the scholars of Ahlus sunnah, protect us against misguidance and sitting with the people of bidah
Ya Allah, help the ummah and that we only take knowledge the scholars of Ahlus sunnah, protect us against misguidance and sitting with the people of bidah
May Allah preserve the Shaykh - Ameen ✨
May Allah expose his hypocrisy امين
May Allah guide him to the straight path
Ya Allah, help the ummah and that we only take knowledge the scholars of Ahlus sunnah, protect us against misguidance and sitting with the people of bidah
I do know that Sheikh Uthman is human and could make mistakes sometimes criticisms that are done constructively are much appreciated than destructive ones. Why is it so hard to just call him personally rather than showing the whole world all of these if you really meant well for your brother in Islam? It breaks my heart always to see that the few people who are striving hard to call towards the right path (Islam) are being tainted this way. There is always a better way to resolve these issues. I'm heart broken by these acts. May Allah guide us all!
These salafis don't mean well, they are a diseased lot with much ignorance in their hearts and minds and of the broad tradition of islamic scholarship. Their diseased methodology from their founder Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab just leads to childish egotistical refutations and fighting with other Muslims which benefits no one and in fact hurts the ummah. Follow scholars who follow a madhab in fiqh and are athari, ashari, or maturidi in aqeeda but all should stay away and approach with severe caution anyone chearleading for “salafiyyah.”
Amin, Jazakillahu khairan.
@Umer Al-badawi okay, jazakallahu khairan.
@Umer Al-badawi This sister is clearly wrong, bc one should warn people against such people but your comment is so disgusting the way ur belittling women "You are a woman, what do you know" Are you saying that women cannot possess knowledge?
Allah created men and woman and didn't favor one over another May Allah forgive you
@Umer Al-badawi save yourself brother, from your ego
JazaakumAllahu khairan for minimising the unnecessary and keeping the refutation to brother Uthmaan short and succinct. May Allah guide us all and make us from al Tawwabeen.
ua-cam.com/video/u4Abt1oOhmo/v-deo.html 31:18
I have just finished watching this video by Uthman entitled “Life of Prophet Muhammad ﷺ from Authentic Sources - Sacrifice.”
He has waffled on but hasn’t given one single “Authentic Source” to back up his assertions.
This is typical Uthman; he makes up stories to put Mo in a good light to make you feel sorry to get your emotions involved, but it’s all fantasies.
The sad thing is you Muslims are taken in; you never ask for evidence; why?
Anything to push away the doubts you have.
Uthman is dishonest.
RD
@@rodofdiscipline1887 you pualians must be sad when your books synonym is contradictions 😂😂
@@IbnAisharadiAllahHuAnha
You say, “you pualians must be sad when your books synonym is contradictions.”
What do you scholars say on that topic?
I will leave you with a few comments from Islams most respected scholars, please consider them carefully.
What do Muslims with a lot more knowledge than you say about the Bible?
1/ Muhammad 'Abduh (1849 - 1905), was an Egyptian jurist and religious scholar
... the charge of corruption of the Biblical texts makes no sense at all. It would not have been possible for Jews and Christians everywhere to agree on changing the text. Even if those in Arabia had done it, the difference between their book and those of their brothers, let us say in Syria and Europe would have been obvious...We believe that these Gospel accounts are the true Gospel.
2/ Mawlawi Muhammad Sa'id
... as God says in the beginning of the Qur'an: “And who believe in that which is revealed unto thee (Muhammad) and that which was revealed before thee, and are certain of the Hereafter. These depend on guidance from their Lord. These are the successful.” (2:4,5) ”Some Muslims imagine that the Injil is corrupted. But as far as corruption is concerned, not even one among all the verses of the Qur'an mentions that the Injil or the Tawrat is corrupted. In the concerned passages it is written that the Jews - yes the Jews, not the Christians - alter the meaning of the passages from the Tawrat while they are explaining them. At least the Christians are completely exonerated from this charge. Hence the Injil is not corrupted and the Tawrat is not corrupted. For it does not necessarily follow that these Scriptures are corrupt because of the wrong opinion of some uninformed persons.
3/ Ibn Kathir
Ismail ibn Kathir =(1301-1373) was a Muslim Muhaddith (narrator), Faqīh, Mufassir, and Historian. He is the author of the most respected and widely used tafsir/
[Quoting Muhammad talking of the Jews and Christians]"David died in the midst of his friends. They were not led astray, nor changed [their books]. The Friends of Christ stayed in
His ordinances and guidance for two hundred years"
4/ Sayyid Ahmad Husayn Shawkat Mirthi
The ordinary Muslim people acknowledge that the Injil is the Word of God. Yet they also believe through hearsay (taqlidi 'aqida) that the Injil is corrupted, even though they cannot indicate what passage was corrupted, when it was corrupted, and who corrupted it. Is there any religious community in this world whose lot is so miserable that they would shred their heavenly Book with their own hands, and then, after restlessly patching it with sackcloth, they must throw dust in the eyes of the people? True, some religious communities change the meaning (tahrif-i ma'nawi) of their Scriptures. To say that God has taken the Injil and the Tawrat into heaven and has abrogated them is to defame and slander God. It is to pour ridicule not only upon the Qur'an but upon all the Books. Abrogation always arises because of error. Laws of earthly kingdoms are abrogated because experience has proved that they are harmful. But God makes no mistake, nor does He lack experience.
5/ Mawlawi Chirag ud-Din
The Qur'an commands us to believe and to honour the previous Scriptures and apostles. According to Surah (Nisa): “O ye who believe! Believe in Allah and His messenger and the Scripture which He hath revealed unto His messenger, and the Scripture which He revealed aforetime.” (4:136) ”When, therefore, it is commanded to believe in these Holy Scriptures, why consider the study of these Scriptures reprehensible? For when the order to believe the Qur'an and the Holy Scriptures is one and the same, how can one conclude that reading the Qur'an is a meritorious act, but that reading the Holy Scriptures is a punishable offence?
6/ Abdullah Saeed
A significant point of tension between today’s Muslims and the ‘People of the Book’ (Jews and Christians) is the common Muslim belief that the Jewish and Christian scriptures that exist today are corrupted and cannot be relied upon in any matters of faith, religion or law. Although this is a popular view, most classical scholars of the Qur’an were far more cautious in their understanding of Qur’anic texts on this issue. This article explores the Qur’an’s references to distortion of scriptural meaning and text, and the views of scholars, particularly Tabari, Qurtubi, Razi, Ibn Taymiyya and Qutb. Qur’anic words such as tahrif are popularly accepted today as referring to deliberate distortion of scripture; however, classical scholars have interpreted the Qur’an’s references in a number of different ways.Almost all suggested that distortion occurred mainly through interpretation and not in the text itself. Although the Qur’an refers to tahrif (distortion), it also exhibits the utmost respect for previous scriptures. Early Muslims adopted a narrow view of scripture, partly because of the nature of the Qur’an, and also in response to the more established religions of Judaism and Christianity, to assert the ‘purity’ of the Qur’an and Islam. Saeed notes that the Jewish and Christian scriptures that exist today are, according to most scholars, largely unchanged since the time of Muhammad and should be respected now as they were then
As salaamu ‘alaikum wa rahmatullaah.
Jazak Allāh Khair for this great clarification filled with evidence!
Barakallaahu feekum.
ua-cam.com/video/u4Abt1oOhmo/v-deo.html 31:18
Jazak Allahu khairan.
ua-cam.com/video/u4Abt1oOhmo/v-deo.html 31:18
4:46
Upon this belief there's consensus
5:01 this karamah is written in many old books of AhlSunnah
جزاكم الله خيرا و بارك الله فيكم
Stop dividing the Ummah fear Allah
Stop making these videos
May Allah guide you and guide us all. Ameen
What is the problem with uthmaan faruuq? Can someone make it short for me? Sometimes it s hard to hold on the speed and understanding together sometimes…
There are saying he promotes or praises imams who support cariji revolutionary sect run by non Muslims and he promotes sofis who exaggerate status of Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him like some some she'uh did.
Don't ever listen to one who criticizes a man's whole life and everything he achieved just for having a small speck of dust on his garment.
A small mistake can make you go to hell.
Follow the methodology of salafs not khalafs
Alhamdulillah for not being a madkhali
Ugh, another khawarij
@@Scott-Eesa I'm amazed how you can call people khariji for something like this.
@@17813_ generally if someone uses the insult “madkhali” then they are khawarij.
If you wanted more nuanced discussion then you should’ve started an adult discussion instead of name calling.
This is your fault.
@@Scott-Eesa what is khawarij? I wanna know if you actually know what it is.
And what's your evidence that generally you are a khariji if you use the word madkhali?
@@17813_ one of the definitions of khawarij is making takfir over major sins.
My experience is that “madkhali” is only used by a clique of angry political radicals who want to talk against every ruler, every government. And get ready for this:
The first kharajite was called so by the Prophet ﷺ because he criticized leadership! The ancestor, so to speak, of all khawarij merely committed the crime of being publicly critical.
Also, such name calling is typical of angry men who have no real argument, just political rage. The evidence from the Sunnah is CLEAR: obey the rulers.
These people claim the prophets burial site is holier-than-thou?
جزاك الله خيرًا أخي العزيز
وجزاك الله خيرا اخي الكريم
أي فرقة أنتم ؟ مصعفقة؟
I think this one is beneficial and Allah knows best. Usually your 'refutes' are not accurate
I heard from a brother that later on uthman ibn farooq refuted tariq masood because he found out more about him
Yes that would be good news akhi
Can u share anything about that. I was recently listening to me with the impression that he follows salaf. But I can see he is with deobandi. But isit he has conference with sheikh karim zaid? Xan anyone clear things.
@@hasinaakter2903 it was on a podcast , but he doesnt refute by name
@@saaimgussain yeah that isn’t sufficient then you praise him specifically in public you must retract in public and clarify this is what is mentioned by the scholars
@@hasinaakter2903 stay away from him take from the major scholars
when he was talking to the sufi, he was MOST LIKELY just being nice yk 😭
Shaykh Uthman later on clarified Tariq Masud's issues in Aqidah in a podcast here.
ua-cam.com/video/u4Abt1oOhmo/v-deo.html
Go to 31:18
He didnt mentioned his name
لا حول و لا قوة الا بالله
have u all refuted your mom's and dads and uncles and aunties ...brothers and sisters.
leave the man alone he's calling people to Allaah and His messenger...everyone will not be perfect that's not for humans to be perfect
OLD TRICKS!!! MAY ALLAH SWT GUIDE YOU OR BREAK YOUR BACKS.
Very sad attempt...
If brothee usman bin farooq didn't mam eit clear . I wouldn't listen to him and will not take knowledge from him.
Fear Allaah brother what are you doing trying to refute everyone????
I think shaytaan is making you do this
Again madkhalits started blaming blindly good people.. Shame on you!
Umaysan is a two face. He and Masjid Tawheed in Detroit, Abu Salah, hijacked and stole a masjid in a way of the kharajis
Lol what are you talking about?
@@yousaf3133 go to 6th circuit court files under Islamic center of Southfield cases … he and his goons pulled of a heist of the century with lies, planting evidence to incriminate and hoodwinked the system of tagut
@@yousaf3133 what are you laughing about? You think it’s a joke what umaysan have done? Oops I forgot maybe people like you who “worship” personalities if they cut someone’s head off and they said I murdered this person you would make excuses for their crimes… I challenge you to tell umaysan and all the other goons that are with him to take the hijacking of the mosque to a scholar …. Guaranteed they would never go!!!!
I have just finished watching this video by Uthman entitled “Life of Prophet Muhammad ﷺ from Authentic Sources - Sacrifice.”
He has waffled on but hasn’t given one single “Authentic Source” to back up his assertions.
This is typical Uthman; he makes up stories to put Mo in a good light to make you feel sorry to get your emotions involved, but it’s all fantasies.
The sad thing is you Muslims are taken in; you never ask for evidence; why?
Anything to push away the doubts you have.
Uthman is dishonest.
RD
Cry baby, churchs empty, christians accepting islam.
Actually, we don't blindly accept everything he says. AT ALL. We don't blindly accept what any scholar says. We also study and we consult texts and other sources on our own. We don't need you to tell us how to practice our religion, thank you for being so considerate. But deal with your own problems first.
Ya Allah, help the ummah and that we only take knowledge the scholars of Ahlus sunnah, protect us against misguidance and sitting with the people of bidah
Umaysan is a hypocrite. He was and is part of a scandal stealing/hijacking a masjid in Michigan… He loves getting ruling from the tagoot 6th circuit court to steal the masjid “legally
Ya Allah, help the ummah and that we only take knowledge the scholars of Ahlus sunnah, protect us against misguidance and sitting with the people of bidah
Ya Allah, help the ummah and that we only take knowledge the scholars of Ahlus sunnah, protect us against misguidance and sitting with the people of bidah