Can we pin this video to the front page of music gear related internet ? It would save a lot of bandwidth and time used every single day this thing is debated.
This is not universally true for all types of tones. Yes, for chugga chugga with a heavily dimed amp, it’s the speakers. Amps and pickups play a bigger role for lower gain.
I'm not a metal guy at all, but the amount of knowledge and innovative experimentation and mindset that i find on this channel keeps me subscribed. Every producer should follow contents like this! Thank you Glenn for providing something that most of us starting now wouldn't be able to try for themself.
The EVH speakers are killer in my book. They're the only speaker I really really love hearing both clean and distorted. To me, even though they're supposedly some variety of a greenback, the highs on them sound way better with high gain than greenbacks to me.
I used to work at an outdoor venue that did weekly concerts to about 2000 people. A few times we had extra speakers in the van from packing down another job just before. On these occasions rather than pack them back in a van for the duration of the show, we'd stand them next to the speakers we usually used at the venue and leave them unplugged. Without fail we'd get compliments about how the extra speakers made the sound better than usual. People really do hear with their eyes.
I can play a Jimmy page solo and my tone sounds exactly like his, because tone is (relatively) easy to mimic, but my playing style is nothing like him. “Tone is in the hands” is a myth “Style is in the hands” is very very true. I think people get the two mixed up. Two guitarists can play the same blues riff and the tone will sound identical, the player with the most soul will make it sound better.
I also think that thing doesn't always apply as much for everything. Like those rythme guitars burriee under a heavy distortion, the only difference a guitarist can make is his tightness
Exactly. I think the problem is we too often use words that have multiple meanings or stray too far into nebulous metaphor. The player provides the technical performing ability, and the "sound" that's in the hands isn't the "sound" that we mean when we're talking about production quality. I think "the sound is in the hands" is not about removing everything but the player as a variable - it's simply saying that your gear isn't going to make you a good player. It's the same both ways - if you play well but your gear is garbage, it will suck. If you play poorly and your gear is top notch, it will also suck. It's like choosing between saving your heart or lungs.
Holy crap THANK YOU I'm a luthier here in Brazil and I've been saying this for years: "FORGET THIS 'TONE WOOD' CRAP". At least in solid instruments (obviously it plays a big part of acoustic instruments), only to be called an ignorant. People have been building guitars out of a billion different materials now, only to always sound exactly as whatever pickup/amp they chose.
I still dont understand how can wood play a significant role, if any on electric guitar tone when it has nothing with producing a sound. Basically, any pick ups and any amp is gonna give you a generic sound with slight differences (all of them are built the same, its not gonna change much), changing the speakers, one of the main outputs of sound should be obvious. Maybe its bcoz my dad replaces speakers every now and then and yeah, the older speakers had bad bass sound and sound quality in general, compared to newer ones, kinda like if you compare quality headphones to low end cheap ones... sometimes its like hearing the same song for the first time.
@@epelly3 > _So do the pickups have as much of an impact as the speakers_ ? In at least some cases, yes. Probably many or all. A thousand years ago I bought a Carvin guitar in a H-S-S config. It played great, but the pickups were simply...lacking. I rewired it with Seymour Duncan "Jeff Beck" and "Jeff Beck Jr" (x2), and it REALLY opened up--sounded SO much better. Prior to that I had a Kramer Pacer that I rewired with EMGs, and it also sounded better. That guitar was stolen, but I still have the Carvin. I should note that I do not play metal to any significant extent (we played mostly rock from the 70s, 80s, 90s, and 2000s), but like @IFeeeeelGood mentioned in another comment, there's a fair portion of Glenn's content and experience that we can apply everywhere.
Even in acoustic instruments, shape and size of the sound chamber is going to have a *much* larger impact than the wood the instrument is made out of. For exactly the same physical reasons that the material a speaker cabinet is made out of doesn't matter much.
Honestly, I believe the "tone is in the hands" statement is directed at younger players who are hypnotized into buying better gear to make them sound better. I used to think that buying better gear was going to make my tone better, but it was my sloppy playing and horrible vibrato that really made me sound different from my favorite players. I could have saved a lot of money if I realized that no multi effects processor or fancy guitar was going to make me sound like John Petrucci
Not directed at young players. This phrase has been around for decades. But definitely aimed at "clean" players. ie who play using clean electric sounds, or acoustics. It is true for them, but not really true for heavy distorted sounds at all.
That would be a fine way to use it except the words being used are still wrong. People can just say "using Petrucci's gear won't make you sound like him". I've asked people what gear they use and they literally respond with "tOnE iS iN tHe FinGeRs". And its just annoying as hell.
@@gazzie12000 nah it's directed towards bad players that but gear thinking they'll sound better Whether you play clean or distorted if you don't fret the frets correctly, don't pluck your strings accurately and don't play your time then no tone is going to make you sound great
@@Crash_Knight yeah those people are annoying as hell At certain level of proficiency what gear you use does matter Now Glen's video is targeted towards people who believe in bullshit and endlessly debate what single piece of gear gives you a certain tone
About 10 years ago I had the pleasure of having about 15 different speaker cabinets in my basement at one time. I ended up keeping a massively oversized Krank cabinet with a front facing bass port loaded with Eminence Legend V12 speakers because it sounded so different in a good way. Sounds more balanced than all the other V30 loaded cabs I tried at the time. I'm in the KW region if you want to borrow it Glenn. If you want to make some IRs, I would be happy to loan it for the cause.
I swear in the many years I’ve been playing I’ve heard all of those myths force fed to me and it never felt right. Thank you for taking so much time in these videos to debunk these myths. I also fell into the trap of buying pickups and didn’t hear a difference either. I learned the hard way. Keep up the good work!! 🤘🏽
Open and semiopen back cabs makes a HUGE difference in tone. I took my cheap stage right 1x12 and turned it into a closed back and it sounds massively different
"The player is essentially ballast." LMAO "Look mr guitar player, you're basically there to keep the guitar from hitting the floor and scratching the finish."
It only applies to acoustic and maybe playing clean channels for electrics. What people hear in most playing is just dynamics or how hard you are strumming or striking a string
Yep. Cabs make all the difference. I realized that when I was investigating Children of Bodom's Alexi Laiho's crazy-town Metal tone that I liked so much. I began looking for Marshall 1960B (straight/bottom cab) like his, but all I was seeing on the used markets were Marshall 1960A (slanted/top cab). Basically, the 1960B just sounds better than the 1960A, hence fewer people are selling those. They found what they were looking for.
You could spend $1900 on a Marshall DSL head and MX cab. And that’s “cheap.” Or you could spend $400 on a hybrid orange head and 1x12 with a greenback. Want to guess which one sounds better? The cheap one. The two heads sound super similar, actually. The cabs make all the difference. But really, if your amp is decently powerful, and doesn’t sound like absolute shit, then the way you sound better is. . . *gasp!* PRACTICE Stunning, rights?
I worked in a guitar store. And yes, cabinets and speakers are underrated. I can not understand why guitarplayers sometimes spend a thousands of dollars in a guitar and a head and at the same time they buy a 4x12 for 200 bucks. It‘s like buying a Ferrari and put wooden wheels on it, isn’t it?
That's a good analogy. It's like giving a cheap Honda civic a nice pair of lightweight wheels with bigger offset(to get more traction)and grippy tires that makes acceleration on slow cars a lot better getting off the line.
I think the “in the hands” idea came from fact a guitarist will sound like themselves no matter what equipment they use. Those with a unique sound to their style can take whatever guitar/amp you give them and they’ll set the EQ/parameters to their ear and play their own style and it will be recognizable as “their sound”. That goes far past just the hands though and is the whole approach to how they set everything as well as their own unique way of playing.
I agree with you guys wholeheartedly. But consider the idea that when we plug into an amp we are not only playing the guitar. We are playing the amp as well. It's a give and take and the more we
"Finger tone" makes a bigger difference in acoustic instruments when you are using advanced techniques. Simple (but rapidly executed at times) metal techniques comes down to this video being correct. I say: just test chug 0000 and worry about finger tone when you wish to solo and actually have enough technique to pull it off.
I was in the "the amp" crowd, and it's pretty cool to be proven wrong this way! Opens up a huge can of worms though, since it's looking like I'm going to have to get some new speakers. Thanks Glenn!
I've recently learned this as well about cabinets. I'd love to get a few cabs for my EVH amp (Orange, Marshall, Mesa)...could get some really cool and different sounds from those.
@@etherealessence I mean, pickups do also have a role. They're filters with their own unique frequency responses, like cabinets and amps. You're not likely to get telecaster tones with humbuckers or jazz bass tones with a precision bass pickup, not without a lot of changes to the rest of the signal chain at least.
@@drpibisback7680 They do have a role, especially in a clean tone or low gain setting, they might have more influence on the sound than the amp. But in the context of high gain distortion, the tones will end up sounding surprisingly similar even across different types of pickups. You'll get more sustain out of a humbucker, but it won't sound THAT different to a single coil. (certainly not nearly as different as it would sound clean) The gain stages and natural compression hide a lot of the subtle nuances of a pickup's tone. Again though, all this changes in a clean or low gain use case. In those cases you'll generally hear less of the amp's influence and more of the pickup's.
Don't worry, you'll only be out a couple hundred dollars at the most for speaker swaps. An amp swap, on the other hand - you're lucky if you're only out several hundred dollars.
Ah, when I answered “the amp” in that poll thought of it from the point of that being where you dial in different tones, rather than different amps trying to dial in the same tone. Strings, pickups, provide the platform for sound. The amp running into a speaker is how you shape that tone into the sound you want. Randy Rhoads used to load his cabinets with Altec speakers rather than Celestions because he found them much clearer. I’ve got a couple of modelling amps, & one of the biggest ways to shift the tone is to switch which speakers it’s emulating
True words. An impedance measurement of the V30s might also give a clue on the sound differences. Tubeamps react to different impedances, another path to the holy grail of sound. If i would live nearby i would help out experimenting all day. The EVH Hempback Combo sounded nice! Endless possibilities...
anyone whos actually recorded serveral combinations of amps and guitars and cabs will tell you instantly that the relationship between the mic and speaker is where you can really shape your tone
@@tinystar3010 I actually showed this to my band several years back. The other guitarist suddenly hated his sound coming through our IEM. I moved his mic maybe half an inch and when he asked what I changed on his amp because it sounded "massive" to him and I showed him how much a couple centimeters could shift the tone.
Just wanted to say. I’ve learned more from this channel, than I have learned from most things. I am NOT a metal player. All of these tests and techniques, can be applied. To just about everything in the world of music. Thank you Glenn!
We absolutely do listen with our eyes. I very often associate an album's sound with its cover artwork. When I hear A Matter of Life and Death by Iron Maiden, I hear "green". With The Final Frontier, I hear "blue", and so on.
@@coreyroberts47 nothing happens haha I don't "hear" color. But I begin associating certain visuals with certain sounds. Those album artworks are just an example that immediately came to my mind. But it's similar to when people see a white guitar and a brown guitar and then basically convince themselves that the brown guitar sounds "warmer", even though they might sound identical. Have you never experienced anything similar?
@@mrcoatsworth429 haha i experience synesthesia. I see colors for songs with no reference artwork, i was wondering if you did the same. Guess im weird lol
THX! Now I will continue to use my old box with celeron speakers from the '80s! I always thought it sounded very fat and now you have convinced me again that this is not a committee!😁🤘👍
Thank you Glenn. Back in 2004 I bought a 4x12 Mesa Cab with V30 speakers because I thought it was the best. Since then, I've always tried to calm down the "bee nest" inside the speakers. If I had the opportunity to watch youtube videos like yours 20 years ago I would have made different choices clearly.
Its not the sound thats in the hands, its the finesse that those hands provide is what changes. It "sounds" different because they play different but theres no actual tone shift
I have a small Regal amp that is in pieces when someone sat on it. The sound of this amp was perfect. A acoustic monster that I played forever. And it was sounding great since the 60's. It's in a plastic box waiting for me to repair it. Such is life.
well i have to say you were absolutely right. the choice of speakers and microphones and their positions are essential for the desired color. and that for any musical style. to make it clear to the bass player in the studio, just switch from one monitor to another! the sound is not in the fingers but in the head. Merci à vous
Maybe I’m just naïve, but when people say “the tone is in the hands” I always thought they meant the performance. Like if you have a virtuoso and a novice play through the same rig, the tones themselves going to be the same, but the virtuoso is going to be a lot more pleasing to listen to than the novice. Edit: Typo. I used the incorrect "Than"
The tone is the same, actually, but gear has no talent and can't make good artistic decisions. But, is far better to hear a talented player with top gear ratter than bad/poor gear. Better to listen Steve Vai playing a very good cheap guitat rather than playing an Ibañez completely out-of-tune, weary, irregular frets, rusted strings, thus rod not tuned, etc.
When "tone is in the hands" it means that the good guitarist knows even to turn the knobs and choose a good guitar speaker, or turn the eq knobs until the gear sound decent.
So... people should say"The performance is in the hands" and "The tone is in the speakers" rather than mix things up and induce poor decisions when buying gear
Yes different dynamics and such, in a tube amp this will create a different experience of emotion. I agree theres something to it, especially with slower, jazzy, or bluesy genres. Maybe not so much in metal
Awesome video! Cab and pickups always made the biggest change to me. If you have terrible pickups, then sometimes you can't, for example, milk out any top end no matter how hard you try because it's simply not there. A guitarist I know has a Les Paul with some kind of zebra pickups (stock) and they're so muffled I can barely stand it. And cabs make a huge difference. That's why the industry of IRs exist. I think some people are still in the stone age. I've heard some people say that "a speaker is a speaker is a speaker" -To which I say: No..... You've only got one speaker then.
@@mikahirvilammi6262 what you said is kind of true. Scale length affects tone so much more than pickup response. However, the way a guitar responds to playing can be dramatically different with different pickups. That can definitely account for some of the change in tone.
@@MrSneakyPants Also that Les Paul has heavy mahogany body that has a lot of lowend in tone. You cannot change the main characters of the guitar with pickups, Les Paul is very dark sounding guitar no matter what ever you do for it. Older Les Pauls like 57' has different kind mahogany though, that sounds brighter than nowdays.
12:07 As an audio engineer, emphasis on engineer, this is so spot on. People listen with their eyes because they don't understand what's really going on with their signal chain because, let's be real, it's too much information anyway unless you're into it. If only there weren't a profit motive to keep everyone confused about what matters with hardware - I don't think we'll see clear-cut marketing and recommendations for gear anytime soon. Speakers are 100% the hardest part of the whole signal chain to design and build, with a lot of compromises in any design, making them the most imperfect filter. They add harmonics too - at high volume even a clean amp will produce 10% distortion just from the speaker, especially since guitar speakers are not designed to perform linearly, just loudly.
My experience when playing with my band was the biggest difference in live sound was when I changed from Marshall cab with GT75 to Vintage 30’s. it was far more noticeable in creating the sound I was chasing than trying pedals, string gauge, tubes. Also playing the same amps through different cabs was huge too. A 4x12 turned an Orange 30w into a high gain monster, through the 1x12 it only had significant breakup but not distortion. If any of that makes sense, good information thanks bro
Is there a reason you prefer switching cabs/amps/guitars throughout a song and not playing the same 4/8 bar riff in a row with the different settings cabs etc?
I would guess switching them randomly will take you by surprise more an you can more easily tell the difference. Human brain recognition. I you have it flipping at the end of an identical phrase, your ears are expecting to start over and you might actually perceive less difference. But that's just my two cents and I'm not even sure I'm right.
I was wondering why he didn’t do just a few straight up chugs when swapping from 412 to 212…. It’s the bass response from the big cab that is overwhelmingly different. I think that would have ended any discussion just on its own.
I'm thinking about this also. My guess is we make our self believe what we want to believe. So if it was clear where the shift is we then are sure the tone shifts even if it is identical. I have experienced this. Now it is all the same. 😁
As a very visual person, i find more inspired to play in different ways with guitars with different colours and shapes and stuff, which in turn affects how i use the tone. Not a cause of tone shift but visual inspiration feels like a factor during production for me at least
I agree with most amps being the same. I collect vintage amps and the breakup is different from tube to tube. The sound is most drastic with different speakers and cabs. But I do believe having your eq being pre or post may make a difference in tone. Also having a presence knob vs not having one seems to provide differences too if you’re big into pedals. Great informative video!
Another way of thinking about this just consider what is actually making the sound? The speaker - it’s actually the thing making the sound. The microphone is actually the thing picking up the sound. The room? Highly influencing the sound in particular with room modes. On acoustic guitar the body is actually making the sound. On our electric guitar the body barely vibrates and isn’t the thing making the sound. Look for things that transition between electrical and vibration and there you will find the filters that make up the sound.
"its in the hands" is relevant to playing style and type. linear movement lines with individual finger and pick strokes have the most touch-feel variance, chord playing has the lowest likelihood of variance due to harmonic complexity in a single chord stroke, your ears arent going to hear stroke or hand as easily. probably why people think the test it meh, but still works in its context.
Glenn did touch on that in the video - articulation and clarity are name-checked as undeniably resulting from the player, but the guitar's timbre itself isn't going to change much.
What is in the hands isn't tone. It won't ever be tone. What is in the hands is technique. Everything anyone says about tone actually being in the hands isn't ever about the tone of the sound, but the technique of the player (Things like the attack, note definition, muting strings that aren't needed, proper pressure to not pull a note out of tune, etc).
@@etherealessence Exactly, you beat me to saying the exact same thing! People mean technique when they say, 'tone' in regards to the hands, they are usually referring to lead lines, played expressively, where vibrato/bending style etc are more relevant. Still just technique though, not 'tone'. Even 'tone' is a vague term; we should be saying 'timbre' really. Guitarists get a lot of terminology wrong - I blame the tremolo on their guitar myself... ;-) A lot of these myths originate in other genres, like blues, where amp difference between a Blackface Deluxe Reverb, a Bassman, and a Tweed Champ is huge, because they're combos and the speaker/cab changes when you change amps! And the difference between a Filtertron, PAF or a strat pickup is more significant when playing clean or crunchy. Not so relevant to metal but these myths just get ported over wholesale.
This is strong content. A very BIG THANK YOU from a beginner guitarist from France. I hope you realise that your work is saving a huge amount of money for the people watching you. I have to say that I can't help but make the connection with the world of motorcycling: bullshit preconceived ideas, spread by "experienced" riders who speak with all the confidence in the world, there are masses of them!
The way you present the different parts of the sound is something I think that often generalized over, mainly speaking to the common statement, " It's all in your hands". Nice job differentiating between frequencies, note articulation, filters, level of breakup from the tubes and so on. You really emphasized the importance of being specific to what's being described. Reminds me of researching building stereo speakers decades ago, and the most important focus was the speakers themselves, not the amp, turntable, cassette deck(pre digital), dating myself here. Here's an exaggerated example, I plugged my bass into my blues Jr, sounded pretty poor, then plugged my single 10 cab bass speaker into the amp, sounded ridiculously different. Like you said, such a cost effective way to have multiple different sounds available.
This was excellent Glenn. One of if not the most thorough test of its kind that’s I’ve seen on UA-cam. People do tend to get caught up in the 100 trivial things that altogether make up less than 5% of tone, and ignore the 2 or 3 that make up the 95%. God it I have to hear again how “warm” or “bright” a rosewood or ebony fretboard is, I’ll die
Great work. Its good to hear the facts. I have an un-powered Kemper Toaster. I decided to buy the Kab, it wasn't as if I knew what to expect from it apart from having more tone options. As you no doubt are aware, it uses a flat response Celestion (G12 I think) speaker. I was aware that the latest OS had Speaker Imprint options. I think there are 19 Imprints to chose from and to experiment with. I was amazed at the tonal changes from one imprint to another. I mean big tonal differences, not simply a small change which is almost imperceptible. Yes, there are imprints that are fairly close, like a Greenback vs a Creamback. However still quite audibly different. This immediately convinced me that the speaker is by far and away the most tone changing link in the audio chain.
That's why I love my Marshall Valvestate 8080. The speaker says "Marshall (with classic logo) G12T by Celestion" witch is even better than the standard Celestion G12T in lower volumes, at least for me. Its tone is inside my heart and nothing can replace it!
Honestly I always assumed "the sound is in the hands" to relate far more to the fact that your amazing clean, crisp, artful, emotional playing will outperform any "tone change". I.e an amazing player on a shit instrument will record a better track than a shit player on an amazing instrument.
Well yes, a better player will write a better part, which is going to sound better, and that part will be inspired by the other instruments but also by the tone he can get out of what he has. Think about it this way, if you have a DI track recorded by a good player, and then you try to get a guitar tone that is significantly different from what the player used to record it, it's very easy to make it sound worse.
I think it can be BOTH!… it does start in the hands, but definitely ends with speaker/cab choice. I’ve played on different rigs and they’ve played on mine… hands made a difference. 🙌🏽
I give you respect for this video. I have been a fan of hifi components for years and watch a lot of UA-cam reviews of audio components. Amplifiers, DA converters, turntables...etc...It's apparent that a lot of audiophiles do no have much technical of scientific experience. This video reminded me of this. People are raving about things while testing them out without any control. Testing amps in different rooms on different speakers..etc...They don't understand placebo effects or things that affect their perception of sound. ..They even offer to test out speakers by micing them and letting people judge with their headphones LOL
They sound even better once you've broken them in by dropping them off a roof and hitting them with a sledgehammer. This loosens up the sound tremendously ;)
Doesn’t matter if your tone is compressed and highly distorted. Otherwise yes it does contribute to the tone. Instead of fricker, maybe you should check what guitar builders think, or what other proficient guitar players think. That being said, it’s probably the smallest effect on tone and is not worth squabbling about.
This is definitely the case with extreme high gain. Once the signal melts all the dynamic range, attack and tonality are kept in tight control. Your not going to notice subtle differences in the players hands with metal tones. I used to demo amps for IndianAmpWorks and we were not using high gain. You can much more easily tell the difference in players and tubes in the ranges before they completely melt. When it comes to Metal guitar I think pickups and speakers/cab have the most dramatic effect on changing tonality. Your video pretty much helped me confirm this. Great video Glen! Thanks for taking the time to test all these theories for metal guitar tone. If you happened to have time I would love to see you do the same thing with only changing the guitar used as well to help people decide which pick-ups they like best. I think that video paired with your cabinet changes here could be a very useful set of videos to help people pick their gear more confidently! Keep up the good work and FU Glen!
The microphone the amp is recorded with and the recording process. The recording is your final product and seals the tone forever on the recording medium. Outside of that everything is fluid, your tone changes even depending on where you stand.
Take it easy old guys, it’s pretty romantic this idea of “the tone is in the fingers”. Your style is in your fingers, but when it comes to the tone, the sound, your equipment plays a really important roll on it. Yet, don’t go to the opposite side of: tone wood shit, original tube screamer vs reissue, etc. And yes, no one will notice if you have the original Japanese pedal or a clone of it. Yes, there are slightly differences, the ts9 has more of such and 808 is a little bit such, but those differences are so ridiculous that it’s not worth it to spend 1000 dollars just coz of that subtle difference. Someone has to put the ball on the ground and say, that’s it, that’s it. So don’t torture yourself coz of a little difference on a pedal.
It is *somewhat* true for string instruments since depending on how close or far you play to the bridge you can get a vast difference in tone. However that's still less of a "the tone is in the hands" and more a "the tone is in the technique".
Great points here, dude. I think we guitarists are kings of overthinking sometimes! And you can create your own living hell going back and forth with gear!
what they usually mean is hand synchronization,technique and phrasing.a famous guitarists you know the sound of will always sound the same no matter what gear they are using.
Hay Glenn, I’ve been screaming this at my guitar player for years and he’s often told me how I don’t understand the intricate workings of a guitar and would never grasp how the player and the wood of a guitar become one to make the tone, plus he’d often say “what would you know your just a drummer”. oh man, I can’t wait to send him this video. Thanks Glenn.
That EVH/Hempback blend is still amazing. If I ever get the money, I will definitely want to have two of each in a stereo rig. Short of that, I'd love to have the IR's.
I’ve appreciated the knowledge sharing of you, Nolly and Kristian. It’s really helped me rethink my gear to try and achieve something that’s more “mine” and not what’s been done for the past 20 years. The more I hear other speakers the more I don’t want V30 in my gear.
I am so impressed with somebody telling the truth .. I always fought about this, explaining to people that tone comes from the speakers, now music styles come from the hands and never never trust the wood for metal or hard rock, never....
I'm gonna be honest. I didn't hear almost any change switching between cabs or which speaker is miced and the incredibly subtle differences is did hear are easily in the realm of margin of error for mic placement. The biggest difference I heard was between the solid state and tube amps and then swapping out the speakers.
That test blew my mind. Thanks for doing this! question: would room response/ noise have any impact on tone shift, or is the mic too close to the speaker for that to have an impact?
I think that if rooms acoustics plays a huge role when mixing on monitors, it should matter when recording cabs. If u record vocals on a shitty sounding room theyre gonna sound horrible, so isnt it the same with cabs?
I don’t own a 4x12 that only has one type of speaker in it. I have 2 veteran 30s from warehouse speakers and 2 Eminence DV-77s in one of my cabs for example. Throw two mics on it and you get drastic tone differences but also I get that low end clarity I love so much. To me the pickups and the speakers are two of the most important variables on how a rig sounds.
My observations over the years lead me a long time ago to realize the biggest impact is in the speaker and cab. The cab has less impact in a close mic'd situation from my experience, but definitely impacts the room sound. The speakers are the final filter before the mic or the ears. On factor that Find makes a huge difference in recording with regard to the cab, is open back vs closed back.
Awesome video Glenn! Would love to see a video on how big an impact your pick ups make. Not like a single coil/p90/humbucker thing but more of a humbucker vs humbucker type of video. I reckon that the tonal shift wouldn't be as huge as people think it would but I don't have the facilities to be able to do such an experiment myself. Be the people's hero!
@@Callum-Morrison not a problem were all here to learn fam :) highly recommend ola's other videos as well, he puts out some incredible content specifically targeted at metal guitarists.
I think the phrase: "The Tone is in the Hands" is related to what an individual guitarist plays over a backingtrack. I mean there are only few things that are different in each player like bends vibratos and down or alternate picking for example, when they play the exact same piece.
Totally true Glenn! Speakers and cabinets are the biggest determinant of your tone. Might I add that the other big thing to consider is pickup height and polepiece adjustment.
Back in the day (many days ago) there were more pronounced differences in equipment. As an example, early 80s Peavey gear all sounded like, well, Peavey. This was particularly true in their mixing boards, which certainly put a "tone" into things. the Peavey mark III, as an example, had such a tone difference that all the kings men and all the Klark Technics EQs in the world couldn't fix what it did to the sound. One of the most important things that has happened in the time between is that most gear now is tested to meet a certain response level. Also, the "meta" solution for amps (and most pedals) have long since been figure out, so if you are building a tube amp you are going to do X, Y, and Z and you will get the best sound possible. You are correct Glen, as the one place that is still as much art as science is in the speakers. We sort of know it all, but "as built" isn't always exactly the same, and cabinets do impart sonic qualities of their own. Combined with different speakers and set perhaps on a different floor surface, the results will vary strongly. It is still a mechanical process that we cannot control precisely enough to replicate perfectly.
I noticed i was getting less and less happy with my V30ies so I started blending them with T75s, and at this point, Im almost using the v30as a filler rather than the main source. Cant wait for those speaker demos man! Been looking to kick around some new tones.
That's what I had done a decade ago with two of my cabs, one a Mesa slant 4x12 and an egnator 4x12. Mesa had V30s while the egnator had 75s. Both sounded great on their own but together sounded better. When I would use stereo effects with both cabs panned out I could tell which side had more mids so I swapped two speakers over to each other cab in an x pattern and each cab sounded super full and rounded out! Much better results when uses panned stereo delays and effects!
I think the "tone is in the fingers" is interpreted very differently by the different camps. In my opinion, when discussing this, we need to define our terms. Some people are very philosophical about it, others (like Glenn) are technical and scientific.
Good point here, dude. I also think you may have noticeable differences with other genres (yes, I know this is a metal channel). But clean tones may pick up more of a guitarist's nuances in their attack and other variables.
The thing is, there is a term that covers what people believe is in the hands and that term is not tone. Tone is not in the hands. Technique is in the hands. There is no interpretation. Although you are right, clearer use of terms would probably help settle this.
@@etherealessence I agree that the technique of the guitar player isn't part of the tone. To me, tone is determined by all the things between the fingers of the player and the soundwaves that come out of the speaker in the end. But the way you play something can change how the end result sounds. You may pick way harder and with the edge of the pick than some other person. And to me, that's technique. But to a lot of people that's also part of the "tone". So while I do agree with you, for many people it's not that clear cut. That's why I said we need to define our terms. That way we'll avoid a lot of meaningless arguments.
I've always interpreted "tone is in the fingers" in terms of playing style rather than actual timbre. If you try and imitate the style of another player, you will sound _exactly_ like them.
@@mrcoatsworth429 this is the problem with the modern world. We live in an age where incorrect facts are still correct because the people that believe them define terms incorrectly. For example, we've seen racist and fascist get twisted up so much they lost their very real meaning. Yes that's a bit of a tangent, but it is absolutely the same thing as people defining technique as tone and going around saying that it's in the hands. We have terms, yes some are nebulous like tone, but they all have common definitions. And pretty much every 'tone is in the hands' explanation I've seen had been about the player's technique. Why not just say that technique is in the hands, since that's what everyone seems to talk about and agree on?
That was awesome Glenn! But what about the pickups?? I was hoping you’d show us how much (or little) variations they can bring to the tone. Thanks again for all the tests! 👍
It's very minimal and can be tweaked easily using an EQ Pedal That is if you are using different Humbuckers, but if you're using single coils then that's a different territory
On cleaner sounds (blues, country) there is a sound difference, but that difference seems to be reduced a lot when played in a highly distorted metal context.
It's probably the compression which prevents me from hearing any distinctions between speakers or cabinets - until I heard the speaker swaps in the same cab. The G12 EVH & Hempback combo war clearly was clearly superior in clarity and frequency range. I have recently been convince by others as to the impact of speaker selection. This video provides the best audio comparison I've found yet. Also, I am convinced that a hearing test of paired dissimilar speaker is necessary before purchase. Comparative analysis requires investment of time (and other resources). Thanks for sharing yours.
Hi Glen, the reason the SUNN 'Beta Lead' sounds so much more 'mid-laden' is easy to explain. 100% of tube amps have what is known as 'high output impedance speaker drive' (Constant Current or CC for short) and drives the speaker with equal power at all frequencies across the guitar range.. Older solid state guitar amps don't, they have 'low impedance speaker drive' and it's this difference that causes the middle-y tone! The lower impedance also 'damps' the speaker cone and causes their lower loudness too. Thankfully, it's also possible to retro-fit the CC to old SS amps, so many can be made to sound and feel exactly the same as a tube power amp! Many modern analogue SS amps now have CC already built in - the Peavey Bandit is just one, hence they're challenging tube amps big time.
According to EVH, back in the 70’s other guitarists that toured with Van Halen like Ted Nugent tried his Plexi rig and were utterly disappointed they couldn’t get close to what he got just by playing through it. In his case, how he and only he played literally was the source of his “tone”. According to him, of course.
Right… but who cares what EVH thinks? We should also listen to this booger eating nobody glenn fricker about tone! I mean, who am I gonna trust? The guy who changed modern guitar and influenced an entire culture? Or the UA-cam idiot who pretends to make records, but doesn’t make records? This is a tough one!
I think, that was not the time of brutal HiGain amps. The less gain you have, the more dynamics are audible and also the specific "tone" of a guitarist. EVH did not only do the tapping and other thricks, he even played them very aggressive, not only with the pick, but also with the right tapping-hand. Of course it's true that the tone is in the hands! Glenn even admits it at 02:50 somehow. Well, if you are overlapping everything what could be audible with tons of higain, then there's no wonder that no one can spot the difference anymore. But that's ok for metal and really a cool thing to know.
Not going to lie, I was typing: "I feel like power chords with a lot of gain aren't the best way to show that tone's not in the hands", Right as you called me out for asking for "Blues licks" on a metal channel....well played, sir. Well played
Still, matter of fact I agree. When I'm asked to play the same riffs I play them completely different (as in another position, not using a pick, and the place where you hit the string in fact does make a huge difference). So showing four players perform the same movement would not make a difference but if the hands were doing something different then it most definitely would. One could argue it's not the same riff of course ..... but yep, that's when Glenn started ranting about blues licks LOL
I find "tone" has become more of a catch-all term rather than the objective meaning based on frequency. Often a players technique for transitioning between frets, strumming/picking , or note/chord combinations they habitually use as being their "tone"
In my opinion "the sound is in the hands" should be changed to: "the phrasing is in the hands". I think poor guitar playing is equated to bad tone while good playing is equated to good tone when using the same set up by different guitarist playing the same riff. PS: If people want to change the tone, maybe star using the TONE knob built in the guitar haha
I always took it to mean something similar to this. EVH is the originator of the phrase, I think, which was meant to obfuscate how he actually got his tone. Ty Tabor of King's X was also notoriously cagey about his gear back in the day, and it seems to me that both players' drive to hide their methods was meant to push other players to stop trying to copy their tone and be original.
@@j.w.herring3834 Yeah that's a really good point too. EVH would turn around during sections of his solos so people woulnd't see how he play them haha.
im glad you specified the clarity and articulation bit at the end of the first part, cause thats what i think when it comes to tone is in the hands. hands wont change amp sounds, but can sound articulated differently and that can make a lot of difference in the way your music is perceived
This was a very informative video, thank you! From my experience and a hard lesson learned in after about 20 years of home recording, I realised the single most important component was the cable and the jack I used. I never cared and bought the cheapest ones for years. Tried many different guitars, pickups, plugins, amps, rooms etc. Never got that result I’ve been seeking. Just a couple of months ago I bought a top quality cable and a pair of quality jacks. Everything suddenly changed. I felt like I have lost decades trying to find the magic solution. Noise and weird pop outs are completely gone and whatever I play sounds like super professional. So, probably many people are just stuck in that very first step and they don’t get how people are recording such clean, rich and powerful guitar tones. I believe this is actually the second step - at least for me.
I was under the impression that the whole “tone is in the hands/fingers” was more about how you play your instrument rather than the exact timbre or characteristics of your recorded sound. As in “[insert famous artist] still sounds like themselves even if they play through cheap, shitty equipment. Their tone isn’t defined by their gear, *the tone is in their fingers*.” The idea being that if someone can still sound like themselves through cheap equipment, you don’t need to focus too much on buying expensive gear, but instead prioritise your technique and style.
The only times I have heard tube changes make a noticeable difference is when you change TYPE of tube (and generally stuff like screen grid resistors and bias to suit) rather than brand etc. So changing from a short to long bottle 6L6, or from a 6L6 to an EL34, KT77, or whatever in the power section, or from 12AX7 to a 5751 in the preamp. Just changing from Sovtek to EHX doesn't do much. I have heard differences between brands, but they are subtle and generally mainly noticeable on clean tones.
”The tone is in the hands” would refer to phrasing, pinch harmonics and palm muting. All guitarists differ in technique. If you would ask Yngwie Malmsteen, Zakk Wylde and Dimebag Darrell to play a short melody, I think you could probably blindtest guess them correctly, all other things equal.
@Lars Norberg well I guess you are right. I would just want to add that you will change the frequency content greatly by for example palm muting or pinch harmonics. It is not only phrasing and how enjoyable it is to listen to.
I followed the rabbit hole of trying out different speakers and I definitely don’t regret it. It has definitely a huge impact on the tone and I’ve found out some great amp/cab/speaker combinations. And I’m still experiencing…
Also the pickups. By the way, a Gretsch Electromatic Centerblock would be a great "can you play metal on" addition to your series. The pickups on those are severely underrated.
You'd be very surprised how similar different pickups can sound. Overall pickups affect the tone more than say the wood, or tubes, but less than the amp does. Moving the same pickup to a different position will usually yield a bigger difference in tone than replacing the pickup. However, after the amp, and speaker/mic/cab, I'd say the next biggest factor is the pickups.
"We listen with our eyes" is something I completely agree with, when the Gibson fanboys see a 50s Les Paul with Burst finish, they immediately think it will sound otherworldly and better than anything else that is made, they don't take into the account that a 60 year old dead tree with titanic rusted hardware won't sound good without a good amp and speaker, definitely not without a good player.
And not all of them sound great. Some are just outright bad guitars. There's always that. You can't just buy a random vintage LP, even a 59 burst, and be guaranteed to get Pearly Gates or Greenie.
That's why ichita something, Tim Hanson and stuff are like the next guitar gods cause we're a bunch of begginers listening with our eyes, and I bet many of the shredders and sweeping picking guys can't play rhythm stuff like Billy Joel or James Hetfield, just blabLRARAMBLAARAM ...
Thanks for clearing up, which thing affects the tone how much. I have a little nitpick: I find it hard to hear the differences if the riffs are changed that much while the parameters (like speakers) change. Is it possible to have the same riff with different parameters for the listening comparison?
Yeah I can confirm that ! I did some testing on my own (no on your level ofc). I asked eveybody I know to bring thier stuff and recorded with it. And the biggest difference was in the cabinet. So I got used V30's made in england, and it improved my sound by a LOT !
Because of your videos on the Celestion V30s i had mesa run my serial number to find out which version i had. Turns out my cab shipped in June 2001 so glad i have a good set of V30s.
Well yeah, when you dime out the gain to sound like angry bees and just chug away at power chords you are not going to get a lot of tone variation between players.
even with cleaner tones, all you hear is variations in dynamics and rythm from player to player. When talking purely about tone (and not about the interpretation of a song, or music in itself), there's not much change. If you let Bonamassa play his thing through Angus' rig, well.. he will sound like Bonamassa... playing Agus' rig.. It's all about making the distinction between the playing (that we often call "tone"), and the sound (that we often call... "tone").
Can we pin this video to the front page of music gear related internet ? It would save a lot of bandwidth and time used every single day this thing is debated.
Yes please
This is not universally true for all types of tones. Yes, for chugga chugga with a heavily dimed amp, it’s the speakers. Amps and pickups play a bigger role for lower gain.
I dont think anything would stop the tone chaser internet blowhards
@@bluestringmusic yes because chuga chuga is used in metal as spectresoundstudio channel is about that
@@bluestringmusic know the context of the video, your comment is unnecessary
I'm not a metal guy at all, but the amount of knowledge and innovative experimentation and mindset that i find on this channel keeps me subscribed.
Every producer should follow contents like this! Thank you Glenn for providing something that most of us starting now wouldn't be able to try for themself.
That EVH/Hempback blend sound is awesome. It sounds so full and wide.
Yeah, I was impressed by the tone they produce together.
Glad someone did this combo
The EVH speakers are killer in my book. They're the only speaker I really really love hearing both clean and distorted. To me, even though they're supposedly some variety of a greenback, the highs on them sound way better with high gain than greenbacks to me.
I hope glenn makes an IR-file out of those. It sounds killer
It sounds soo good. While the '06 vintage 30's sounds like paper.
I used to work at an outdoor venue that did weekly concerts to about 2000 people. A few times we had extra speakers in the van from packing down another job just before. On these occasions rather than pack them back in a van for the duration of the show, we'd stand them next to the speakers we usually used at the venue and leave them unplugged. Without fail we'd get compliments about how the extra speakers made the sound better than usual. People really do hear with their eyes.
I can play a Jimmy page solo and my tone sounds exactly like his, because tone is (relatively) easy to mimic, but my playing style is nothing like him.
“Tone is in the hands” is a myth
“Style is in the hands” is very very true.
I think people get the two mixed up. Two guitarists can play the same blues riff and the tone will sound identical, the player with the most soul will make it sound better.
Dude so true
Try heroin and whiskey
I also think that thing doesn't always apply as much for everything. Like those rythme guitars burriee under a heavy distortion, the only difference a guitarist can make is his tightness
Exactly. I think the problem is we too often use words that have multiple meanings or stray too far into nebulous metaphor. The player provides the technical performing ability, and the "sound" that's in the hands isn't the "sound" that we mean when we're talking about production quality. I think "the sound is in the hands" is not about removing everything but the player as a variable - it's simply saying that your gear isn't going to make you a good player. It's the same both ways - if you play well but your gear is garbage, it will suck. If you play poorly and your gear is top notch, it will also suck. It's like choosing between saving your heart or lungs.
Bullshit. if you two guitarists play the same notes, the same way, using the same gear then they'll sound the same
I just learned more in 20 min than in the last decade of playing guitar. Thank you so much for sharing this experiment with us
If you want a balanced tone go with Daphne Blue finishes, never fails.
And Surf Green gives you more highs and sparkle
@@shkibby1 Surf Green is also great for an oldies tone like Dick Dale and Buddy Holly.
*Laughs in Billy Corgan
Dude everyone knows black guitars sound more metal. For vintage tones try sunburst. And 2 tone sunburst sounds more vintage than a 3 tone…
WTF does "balanced tone" even mean?
Holy crap THANK YOU
I'm a luthier here in Brazil and I've been saying this for years: "FORGET THIS 'TONE WOOD' CRAP". At least in solid instruments (obviously it plays a big part of acoustic instruments), only to be called an ignorant.
People have been building guitars out of a billion different materials now, only to always sound exactly as whatever pickup/amp they chose.
I still dont understand how can wood play a significant role, if any on electric guitar tone when it has nothing with producing a sound. Basically, any pick ups and any amp is gonna give you a generic sound with slight differences (all of them are built the same, its not gonna change much), changing the speakers, one of the main outputs of sound should be obvious.
Maybe its bcoz my dad replaces speakers every now and then and yeah, the older speakers had bad bass sound and sound quality in general, compared to newer ones, kinda like if you compare quality headphones to low end cheap ones... sometimes its like hearing the same song for the first time.
Even Plywood sounds just fine. Oh, I just remembered Danelectro as I wrote that.
So do the pickups have as much of an impact as the speakers?
@@epelly3 > _So do the pickups have as much of an impact as the speakers_ ?
In at least some cases, yes. Probably many or all.
A thousand years ago I bought a Carvin guitar in a H-S-S config. It played great, but the pickups were simply...lacking.
I rewired it with Seymour Duncan "Jeff Beck" and "Jeff Beck Jr" (x2), and it REALLY opened up--sounded SO much better.
Prior to that I had a Kramer Pacer that I rewired with EMGs, and it also sounded better. That guitar was stolen, but I still have the Carvin.
I should note that I do not play metal to any significant extent (we played mostly rock from the 70s, 80s, 90s, and 2000s), but like @IFeeeeelGood mentioned in another comment, there's a fair portion of Glenn's content and experience that we can apply everywhere.
Even in acoustic instruments, shape and size of the sound chamber is going to have a *much* larger impact than the wood the instrument is made out of. For exactly the same physical reasons that the material a speaker cabinet is made out of doesn't matter much.
Honestly, I believe the "tone is in the hands" statement is directed at younger players who are hypnotized into buying better gear to make them sound better. I used to think that buying better gear was going to make my tone better, but it was my sloppy playing and horrible vibrato that really made me sound different from my favorite players. I could have saved a lot of money if I realized that no multi effects processor or fancy guitar was going to make me sound like John Petrucci
Not directed at young players. This phrase has been around for decades. But definitely aimed at "clean" players. ie who play using clean electric sounds, or acoustics. It is true for them, but not really true for heavy distorted sounds at all.
That would be a fine way to use it except the words being used are still wrong. People can just say "using Petrucci's gear won't make you sound like him". I've asked people what gear they use and they literally respond with "tOnE iS iN tHe FinGeRs".
And its just annoying as hell.
@@gazzie12000 nah it's directed towards bad players that but gear thinking they'll sound better
Whether you play clean or distorted if you don't fret the frets correctly, don't pluck your strings accurately and don't play your time then no tone is going to make you sound great
@@Crash_Knight yeah those people are annoying as hell
At certain level of proficiency what gear you use does matter
Now Glen's video is targeted towards people who believe in bullshit and endlessly debate what single piece of gear gives you a certain tone
Hahaha!!! I remember how disappointed I was when I bought an Ibanez JEM 777vbk and didn't sound like Steve Vai 😢 ... it does look pretty cool 😄👍
About 10 years ago I had the pleasure of having about 15 different speaker cabinets in my basement at one time. I ended up keeping a massively oversized Krank cabinet with a front facing bass port loaded with Eminence Legend V12 speakers because it sounded so different in a good way. Sounds more balanced than all the other V30 loaded cabs I tried at the time. I'm in the KW region if you want to borrow it Glenn. If you want to make some IRs, I would be happy to loan it for the cause.
And perhaps you could make some IRS yourself, I wouldn’t mind spending some bucks over that “sound”. Props man
alot of people shit on the krankenstien amp..... its by far my favorite amp.
So the one thing in a guitar rig that actually makes sound is the one thing that actually affects sound? Who would’ve known?
Wait, wait! So you're telling me the bits that actually make the noise are the main influences on the tone?? Mind blown dude!
Shocking, isn’t it?
You know it’s a serious tone difference when you can hear the changes on a phone speaker…
Good test man!
Exactly
I swear in the many years I’ve been playing I’ve heard all of those myths force fed to me and it never felt right. Thank you for taking so much time in these videos to debunk these myths. I also fell into the trap of buying pickups and didn’t hear a difference either. I learned the hard way. Keep up the good work!! 🤘🏽
Open and semiopen back cabs makes a HUGE difference in tone. I took my cheap stage right 1x12 and turned it into a closed back and it sounds massively different
"The player is essentially ballast." LMAO
"Look mr guitar player, you're basically there to keep the guitar from hitting the floor and scratching the finish."
I think “hands changing tone” only applies to Tony Iommi. He’s the only guitarist whose fingers aren’t made of fingers.
Jerry Garcia was missing a finger or two as well.
Most of his fingers are fingers
I think it applies to people who are masters of their craft on a higher level
It only applies to acoustic and maybe playing clean channels for electrics. What people hear in most playing is just dynamics or how hard you are strumming or striking a string
@Totchahaki The tone is in the feet.
as a beginner to mixing and sound engineering, this made me more motivated to stop complaining about my gear. cheers glenn!
@Cameron it will and no one will know
@Cameron Sure if it's Helix
hey it's nice seeing you here!
@@thewarturtles5663 hey!!! :-)
Yep. Cabs make all the difference. I realized that when I was investigating Children of Bodom's Alexi Laiho's crazy-town Metal tone that I liked so much. I began looking for Marshall 1960B (straight/bottom cab) like his, but all I was seeing on the used markets were Marshall 1960A (slanted/top cab). Basically, the 1960B just sounds better than the 1960A, hence fewer people are selling those. They found what they were looking for.
You could spend $1900 on a Marshall DSL head and MX cab. And that’s “cheap.” Or you could spend $400 on a hybrid orange head and 1x12 with a greenback. Want to guess which one sounds better? The cheap one. The two heads sound super similar, actually. The cabs make all the difference. But really, if your amp is decently powerful, and doesn’t sound like absolute shit, then the way you sound better is. . . *gasp!*
PRACTICE
Stunning, rights?
I worked in a guitar store. And yes, cabinets and speakers are underrated. I can not understand why guitarplayers sometimes spend a thousands of dollars in a guitar and a head and at the same time they buy a 4x12 for 200 bucks. It‘s like buying a Ferrari and put wooden wheels on it, isn’t it?
NGL that's a very nice comparison, as when you are modifying a car to be faster the couple first things you should do are wheels and tires
One big problem is most grass roots players don't get to play their own cabs at gigs
That's a good analogy. It's like giving a cheap Honda civic a nice pair of lightweight wheels with bigger offset(to get more traction)and grippy tires that makes acceleration on slow cars a lot better getting off the line.
I think the “in the hands” idea came from fact a guitarist will sound like themselves no matter what equipment they use. Those with a unique sound to their style can take whatever guitar/amp you give them and they’ll set the EQ/parameters to their ear and play their own style and it will be recognizable as “their sound”. That goes far past just the hands though and is the whole approach to how they set everything as well as their own unique way of playing.
Plus the more subtle nuances of their technique and overall competence... and other factors that will generally be obscured by a lot of gain.
@@theystoleitfromus very true. I personally play a lot of blues rock stuff and the less gain you’re using the more noticeable small differences are.
I agree with you guys wholeheartedly. But consider the idea that when we plug into an amp we are not only playing the guitar. We are playing the amp as well. It's a give and take and the more we
Give the more we get out of it. It's a reaction thing. That's what makes our balls tingle when we hit those juicy harmonics!
"Finger tone" makes a bigger difference in acoustic instruments when you are using advanced techniques. Simple (but rapidly executed at times) metal techniques comes down to this video being correct. I say: just test chug 0000 and worry about finger tone when you wish to solo and actually have enough technique to pull it off.
Glenn, everybody knows that the cooler the glasses you wear, the better your tone
Hmmmmmm…worth a try and the worst thing that can happen is I get a new pair of kick ass glasses.
No, it is Haircut - and hair metal is the proof for
I always heard it was the awesomeness of your denim jacket. But hey, maybe I'm wrong.
LMAO Good one!
I can agree with that.
I was in the "the amp" crowd, and it's pretty cool to be proven wrong this way! Opens up a huge can of worms though, since it's looking like I'm going to have to get some new speakers. Thanks Glenn!
I've recently learned this as well about cabinets. I'd love to get a few cabs for my EVH amp (Orange, Marshall, Mesa)...could get some really cool and different sounds from those.
Watching this channel is the only reason i knew it was speaker/mic/cab. Otherwise I probably would have said something stupid like pickups.
@@etherealessence I mean, pickups do also have a role. They're filters with their own unique frequency responses, like cabinets and amps. You're not likely to get telecaster tones with humbuckers or jazz bass tones with a precision bass pickup, not without a lot of changes to the rest of the signal chain at least.
@@drpibisback7680 They do have a role, especially in a clean tone or low gain setting, they might have more influence on the sound than the amp. But in the context of high gain distortion, the tones will end up sounding surprisingly similar even across different types of pickups. You'll get more sustain out of a humbucker, but it won't sound THAT different to a single coil. (certainly not nearly as different as it would sound clean) The gain stages and natural compression hide a lot of the subtle nuances of a pickup's tone.
Again though, all this changes in a clean or low gain use case. In those cases you'll generally hear less of the amp's influence and more of the pickup's.
Don't worry, you'll only be out a couple hundred dollars at the most for speaker swaps. An amp swap, on the other hand - you're lucky if you're only out several hundred dollars.
Ah, when I answered “the amp” in that poll thought of it from the point of that being where you dial in different tones, rather than different amps trying to dial in the same tone.
Strings, pickups, provide the platform for sound. The amp running into a speaker is how you shape that tone into the sound you want.
Randy Rhoads used to load his cabinets with Altec speakers rather than Celestions because he found them much clearer.
I’ve got a couple of modelling amps, & one of the biggest ways to shift the tone is to switch which speakers it’s emulating
True words. An impedance measurement of the V30s might also give a clue on the sound differences. Tubeamps react to different impedances, another path to the holy grail of sound. If i would live nearby i would help out experimenting all day. The EVH Hempback Combo sounded nice! Endless possibilities...
anyone whos actually recorded serveral combinations of amps and guitars and cabs will tell you instantly that the relationship between the mic and speaker is where you can really shape your tone
Even in bias fx you can dramatically change the tone of any amp model with different combos of mics/mic placement
Very valid point. The mic you use and even its position to and distance from the speaker can drastically affect the recorded tone.
@@tinystar3010 I actually showed this to my band several years back. The other guitarist suddenly hated his sound coming through our IEM. I moved his mic maybe half an inch and when he asked what I changed on his amp because it sounded "massive" to him and I showed him how much a couple centimeters could shift the tone.
and what you shape always starts with the amp itself, can't shape a fender into a metal monster ,
@@bojangles4704 well duh
Just wanted to say. I’ve learned more from this channel, than I have learned from most things. I am NOT a metal player. All of these tests and techniques, can be applied. To just about everything in the world of music. Thank you Glenn!
Word, I'm not even a musician, I do a bit of sound tech, sound design and sonic art. I prefer dark harsh rich textures, and theory based on science.
We absolutely do listen with our eyes. I very often associate an album's sound with its cover artwork. When I hear A Matter of Life and Death by Iron Maiden, I hear "green". With The Final Frontier, I hear "blue", and so on.
I do have this as well
You might have synesthesia. I'm a spatial sequence type.
What happens when yiu dont have album art tho? Or do you have different colors for each song on the album?
@@coreyroberts47 nothing happens haha I don't "hear" color. But I begin associating certain visuals with certain sounds. Those album artworks are just an example that immediately came to my mind. But it's similar to when people see a white guitar and a brown guitar and then basically convince themselves that the brown guitar sounds "warmer", even though they might sound identical. Have you never experienced anything similar?
@@mrcoatsworth429 haha i experience synesthesia. I see colors for songs with no reference artwork, i was wondering if you did the same. Guess im weird lol
THX! Now I will continue to use my old box with celeron speakers from the '80s! I always thought it sounded very fat and now you have convinced me again that this is not a committee!😁🤘👍
Thank you Glenn. Back in 2004 I bought a 4x12 Mesa Cab with V30 speakers because I thought it was the best. Since then, I've always tried to calm down the "bee nest" inside the speakers. If I had the opportunity to watch youtube videos like yours 20 years ago I would have made different choices clearly.
"I'm sorry Arthur, my eyes are attracted to shiny objects." - The Tick
Gotta love a Tick reference.
"SPOON!"
@@finnsterling6514 "I am the mad bomber, what bombs at midnight!"
@@psychochicken9535 Man. I need to watch this show again. Every character in this "universe" is just so brilliantly put together.
"Thrakazog with a 'k'!"
"Susan"
Holy shit, you can hear the difference between the 2006 and 2003 Mesa on a phone speaker.
Same with the EVH vs Hempback.
@@psychochicken9535 Yeah, I caught that as well. Makes his point pretty well.
@@psychochicken9535 I thought the Hempback sounded rubbish.....until it was blended and then It was amazing!
@@gothnev it was probably made for the folks who's into the logo on the back lol.
The 06 almost sounds like they blasted it with white noise on mine. I'm sure the nuances would be different through my cans but wow that was stark.
Its not the sound thats in the hands, its the finesse that those hands provide is what changes. It "sounds" different because they play different but theres no actual tone shift
Exactly, music is in the hands of who makes it, definitely not tone
Exactly. Technique is in the hands, not tone.
I have a small Regal amp that is in pieces when someone sat on it. The sound of this amp was perfect. A acoustic monster that I played forever. And it was sounding great since the 60's. It's in a plastic box waiting for me to repair it. Such is life.
well i have to say you were absolutely right. the choice of speakers and microphones and their positions are essential for the desired color. and that for any musical style. to make it clear to the bass player in the studio, just switch from one monitor to another! the sound is not in the fingers but in the head. Merci à vous
Hey Glenn, how about making an IR of the EVH/Hempback speaker combo? I really love the warmth of that tone of that cab!
Agreed!
Definitely!
Try to find an IR of Eminence Texas Heat. I have one of those and it sounds similar to the blend he did.
I agree. That was my favorite sounding cab/speaker combo on this video.
yes this please
Maybe I’m just naïve, but when people say “the tone is in the hands” I always thought they meant the performance. Like if you have a virtuoso and a novice play through the same rig, the tones themselves going to be the same, but the virtuoso is going to be a lot more pleasing to listen to than the novice.
Edit: Typo. I used the incorrect "Than"
The tone is the same, actually, but gear has no talent and can't make good artistic decisions. But, is far better to hear a talented player with top gear ratter than bad/poor gear. Better to listen Steve Vai playing a very good cheap guitat rather than playing an Ibañez completely out-of-tune, weary, irregular frets, rusted strings, thus rod not tuned, etc.
When "tone is in the hands" it means that the good guitarist knows even to turn the knobs and choose a good guitar speaker, or turn the eq knobs until the gear sound decent.
So... people should say"The performance is in the hands" and "The tone is in the speakers" rather than mix things up and induce poor decisions when buying gear
@@LeCompositeur I like that. That's the best way to put it.
Yes different dynamics and such, in a tube amp this will create a different experience of emotion. I agree theres something to it, especially with slower, jazzy, or bluesy genres. Maybe not so much in metal
Awesome video! Cab and pickups always made the biggest change to me. If you have terrible pickups, then sometimes you can't, for example, milk out any top end no matter how hard you try because it's simply not there. A guitarist I know has a Les Paul with some kind of zebra pickups (stock) and they're so muffled I can barely stand it. And cabs make a huge difference. That's why the industry of IRs exist. I think some people are still in the stone age. I've heard some people say that "a speaker is a speaker is a speaker" -To which I say: No..... You've only got one speaker then.
Les Paul tone doesn't dramatically change even if you change pickups, been there done that you know.
@@mikahirvilammi6262 lol okay then...
@@mikahirvilammi6262 I beg to differ...especially with the low end frequencies.
@@mikahirvilammi6262 what you said is kind of true. Scale length affects tone so much more than pickup response. However, the way a guitar responds to playing can be dramatically different with different pickups. That can definitely account for some of the change in tone.
@@MrSneakyPants Also that Les Paul has heavy mahogany body that has a lot of lowend in tone. You cannot change the main characters of the guitar with pickups, Les Paul is very dark sounding guitar no matter what ever you do for it. Older Les Pauls like 57' has different kind mahogany though, that sounds brighter than nowdays.
12:07 As an audio engineer, emphasis on engineer, this is so spot on. People listen with their eyes because they don't understand what's really going on with their signal chain because, let's be real, it's too much information anyway unless you're into it. If only there weren't a profit motive to keep everyone confused about what matters with hardware - I don't think we'll see clear-cut marketing and recommendations for gear anytime soon. Speakers are 100% the hardest part of the whole signal chain to design and build, with a lot of compromises in any design, making them the most imperfect filter. They add harmonics too - at high volume even a clean amp will produce 10% distortion just from the speaker, especially since guitar speakers are not designed to perform linearly, just loudly.
My experience when playing with my band was the biggest difference in live sound was when I changed from Marshall cab with GT75 to Vintage 30’s. it was far more noticeable in creating the sound I was chasing than trying pedals, string gauge, tubes.
Also playing the same amps through different cabs was huge too. A 4x12 turned an Orange 30w into a high gain monster, through the 1x12 it only had significant breakup but not distortion.
If any of that makes sense, good information thanks bro
I do love that you do sound tests as a mix. So often people focus in on details that will never be heard in a full mix/band performance.
No kidding! I couldn’t hear a worthwhile difference until the Hempbacks entered the equation.
Is there a reason you prefer switching cabs/amps/guitars throughout a song and not playing the same 4/8 bar riff in a row with the different settings cabs etc?
I would guess switching them randomly will take you by surprise more an you can more easily tell the difference.
Human brain recognition.
I you have it flipping at the end of an identical phrase, your ears are expecting to start over and you might actually perceive less difference.
But that's just my two cents and I'm not even sure I'm right.
Good question, was wondering the same.
Good point...it may be a more valid test with expanding the riffs and more movement overall. Would that create a slight difference? It's possible.
I was wondering why he didn’t do just a few straight up chugs when swapping from 412 to 212…. It’s the bass response from the big cab that is overwhelmingly different. I think that would have ended any discussion just on its own.
I'm thinking about this also. My guess is we make our self believe what we want to believe. So if it was clear where the shift is we then are sure the tone shifts even if it is identical. I have experienced this. Now it is all the same. 😁
As a very visual person, i find more inspired to play in different ways with guitars with different colours and shapes and stuff, which in turn affects how i use the tone. Not a cause of tone shift but visual inspiration feels like a factor during production for me at least
I agree with most amps being the same. I collect vintage amps and the breakup is different from tube to tube. The sound is most drastic with different speakers and cabs. But I do believe having your eq being pre or post may make a difference in tone. Also having a presence knob vs not having one seems to provide differences too if you’re big into pedals. Great informative video!
True indeed!
Another way of thinking about this just consider what is actually making the sound? The speaker - it’s actually the thing making the sound. The microphone is actually the thing picking up the sound. The room? Highly influencing the sound in particular with room modes. On acoustic guitar the body is actually making the sound. On our electric guitar the body barely vibrates and isn’t the thing making the sound.
Look for things that transition between electrical and vibration and there you will find the filters that make up the sound.
Amazing video dude..and the riffs??? My god.
Yeah. The riffs on this channel are off the chain.
Picking up a strong A7X's Sidewinder vibe from the part at 4:15 and I love it
Hahah those modified seek & destroy riffs at 6:30
Un fratello. ❤️
Glenn is absolutely killing it with the tone these days. That worm pedal one, the vintage Fender combo, and now the EVH/Greenback combo. sick stuff
"its in the hands" is relevant to playing style and type. linear movement lines with individual finger and pick strokes have the most touch-feel variance, chord playing has the lowest likelihood of variance due to harmonic complexity in a single chord stroke, your ears arent going to hear stroke or hand as easily. probably why people think the test it meh, but still works in its context.
Glenn did touch on that in the video - articulation and clarity are name-checked as undeniably resulting from the player, but the guitar's timbre itself isn't going to change much.
What is in the hands isn't tone. It won't ever be tone. What is in the hands is technique. Everything anyone says about tone actually being in the hands isn't ever about the tone of the sound, but the technique of the player (Things like the attack, note definition, muting strings that aren't needed, proper pressure to not pull a note out of tune, etc).
@@etherealessence Exactly, you beat me to saying the exact same thing! People mean technique when they say, 'tone' in regards to the hands, they are usually referring to lead lines, played expressively, where vibrato/bending style etc are more relevant. Still just technique though, not 'tone'. Even 'tone' is a vague term; we should be saying 'timbre' really. Guitarists get a lot of terminology wrong - I blame the tremolo on their guitar myself... ;-)
A lot of these myths originate in other genres, like blues, where amp difference between a Blackface Deluxe Reverb, a Bassman, and a Tweed Champ is huge, because they're combos and the speaker/cab changes when you change amps! And the difference between a Filtertron, PAF or a strat pickup is more significant when playing clean or crunchy. Not so relevant to metal but these myths just get ported over wholesale.
This is strong content.
A very BIG THANK YOU from a beginner guitarist from France. I hope you realise that your work is saving a huge amount of money for the people watching you.
I have to say that I can't help but make the connection with the world of motorcycling: bullshit preconceived ideas, spread by "experienced" riders who speak with all the confidence in the world, there are masses of them!
The way you present the different parts of the sound is something I think that often generalized over, mainly speaking to the common statement, " It's all in your hands".
Nice job differentiating between frequencies, note articulation, filters, level of breakup from the tubes and so on. You really emphasized the importance of being specific to what's being described. Reminds me of researching building stereo speakers decades ago, and the most important focus was the speakers themselves, not the amp, turntable, cassette deck(pre digital), dating myself here.
Here's an exaggerated example, I plugged my bass into my blues Jr, sounded pretty poor, then plugged my single 10 cab bass speaker into the amp, sounded ridiculously different. Like you said, such a cost effective way to have multiple different sounds available.
Great stuff, Glenn! Through a 5150 on full gain, I’d be hard pressed to tell an ESP from a Telecaster, tbh.
This may be one of the most informative tone videos I have ever seen, keep up the good work glenn!
This was excellent Glenn. One of if not the most thorough test of its kind that’s I’ve seen on UA-cam. People do tend to get caught up in the 100 trivial things that altogether make up less than 5% of tone, and ignore the 2 or 3 that make up the 95%. God it I have to hear again how “warm” or “bright” a rosewood or ebony fretboard is, I’ll die
Great work. Its good to hear the facts. I have an un-powered Kemper Toaster. I decided to buy the Kab, it wasn't as if I knew what to expect from it apart from having more tone options. As you no doubt are aware, it uses a flat response Celestion (G12 I think) speaker. I was aware that the latest OS had Speaker Imprint options. I think there are 19 Imprints to chose from and to experiment with. I was amazed at the tonal changes from one imprint to another. I mean big tonal differences, not simply a small change which is almost imperceptible. Yes, there are imprints that are fairly close, like a Greenback vs a Creamback. However still quite audibly different. This immediately convinced me that the speaker is by far and away the most tone changing link in the audio chain.
That's why I love my Marshall Valvestate 8080. The speaker says "Marshall (with classic logo) G12T by Celestion" witch is even better than the standard Celestion G12T in lower volumes, at least for me. Its tone is inside my heart and nothing can replace it!
I had the 8080 Valvestate back in the day. Cool amp!
"We hear with our eyes". And I thought that only applied to drummers (guilty drummer here). Love the videos, Glenn. Keep up the awesomeness and GFY!
Honestly I always assumed "the sound is in the hands" to relate far more to the fact that your amazing clean, crisp, artful, emotional playing will outperform any "tone change". I.e an amazing player on a shit instrument will record a better track than a shit player on an amazing instrument.
Well yes, a better player will write a better part, which is going to sound better, and that part will be inspired by the other instruments but also by the tone he can get out of what he has.
Think about it this way, if you have a DI track recorded by a good player, and then you try to get a guitar tone that is significantly different from what the player used to record it, it's very easy to make it sound worse.
Best video in a long time, Glen. I would love a deeper dive into various Mesa cabs and speakers including the EVM 12L and C90.
I think it can be BOTH!… it does start in the hands, but definitely ends with speaker/cab choice. I’ve played on different rigs and they’ve played on mine… hands made a difference. 🙌🏽
I give you respect for this video. I have been a fan of hifi components for years and watch a lot of UA-cam reviews of audio components. Amplifiers, DA converters, turntables...etc...It's apparent that a lot of audiophiles do no have much technical of scientific experience. This video reminded me of this. People are raving about things while testing them out without any control. Testing amps in different rooms on different speakers..etc...They don't understand placebo effects or things that affect their perception of sound. ..They even offer to test out speakers by micing them and letting people judge with their headphones LOL
This must have been very time consuming, very instructive. Probably the best video yet on your channel. Thank you man !😀
The one thing we all know is that the line 6 spider gets the best tone
WRONG! Its a modeling amp. It gets the best TONES! ;)
Lol!
I do love the tones these things make when Glenn smacks them with the Hammer of Truth.
Tyrant Recto is king haha
They sound even better once you've broken them in by dropping them off a roof and hitting them with a sledgehammer. This loosens up the sound tremendously ;)
I guess everyone who ever dabbled in amp sims should know that truth - the cab, speaker & mic combos are what defines tone.
Also pickups and how the guitar resonates a.k.a tone wood.
@@bluestringmusic no
@@bluestringmusic hells no
@@bluestringmusic absolutely not. Tonewood is a myth.
Doesn’t matter if your tone is compressed and highly distorted. Otherwise yes it does contribute to the tone. Instead of fricker, maybe you should check what guitar builders think, or what other proficient guitar players think.
That being said, it’s probably the smallest effect on tone and is not worth squabbling about.
This is definitely the case with extreme high gain. Once the signal melts all the dynamic range, attack and tonality are kept in tight control. Your not going to notice subtle differences in the players hands with metal tones. I used to demo amps for IndianAmpWorks and we were not using high gain. You can much more easily tell the difference in players and tubes in the ranges before they completely melt. When it comes to Metal guitar I think pickups and speakers/cab have the most dramatic effect on changing tonality. Your video pretty much helped me confirm this. Great video Glen! Thanks for taking the time to test all these theories for metal guitar tone. If you happened to have time I would love to see you do the same thing with only changing the guitar used as well to help people decide which pick-ups they like best. I think that video paired with your cabinet changes here could be a very useful set of videos to help people pick their gear more confidently! Keep up the good work and FU Glen!
The microphone the amp is recorded with and the recording process. The recording is your final product and seals the tone forever on the recording medium. Outside of that everything is fluid, your tone changes even depending on where you stand.
Take it easy old guys, it’s pretty romantic this idea of “the tone is in the fingers”.
Your style is in your fingers, but when it comes to the tone, the sound, your equipment plays a really important roll on it.
Yet, don’t go to the opposite side of: tone wood shit, original tube screamer vs reissue, etc. And yes, no one will notice if you have the original Japanese pedal or a clone of it. Yes, there are slightly differences, the ts9 has more of such and 808 is a little bit such, but those differences are so ridiculous that it’s not worth it to spend 1000 dollars just coz of that subtle difference. Someone has to put the ball on the ground and say, that’s it, that’s it.
So don’t torture yourself coz of a little difference on a pedal.
It is *somewhat* true for string instruments since depending on how close or far you play to the bridge you can get a vast difference in tone. However that's still less of a "the tone is in the hands" and more a "the tone is in the technique".
Great points here, dude. I think we guitarists are kings of overthinking sometimes! And you can create your own living hell going back and forth with gear!
what they usually mean is hand synchronization,technique and phrasing.a famous guitarists you know the sound of will always sound the same no matter what gear they are using.
The TECHNIQUE is in the hands, the TONE is in the gear, together they make a SOUND
@@ivanbraslaso true
Hay Glenn, I’ve been screaming this at my guitar player for years and he’s often told me how I don’t understand the intricate workings of a guitar and would never grasp how the player and the wood of a guitar become one to make the tone, plus he’d often say “what would you know your just a drummer”. oh man, I can’t wait to send him this video. Thanks Glenn.
Maybe don't scream so much and listen more.
That EVH/Hempback blend is still amazing. If I ever get the money, I will definitely want to have two of each in a stereo rig. Short of that, I'd love to have the IR's.
Right? When I heard the back and forth I was so hoping he would blend them together, that sound is bloody massive!
The blend sounded great, the hemps alone seemed a bit dull
I’ve appreciated the knowledge sharing of you, Nolly and Kristian. It’s really helped me rethink my gear to try and achieve something that’s more “mine” and not what’s been done for the past 20 years. The more I hear other speakers the more I don’t want V30 in my gear.
I am so impressed with somebody telling the truth .. I always fought about this, explaining to people that tone comes from the speakers, now music styles come from the hands and never never trust the wood for metal or hard rock,
never....
"The makeup of the guitar doesn't affect the tone." You're wrong, Glenn. Pink paint and Hello Kitty stickers really do change the tone.
Reminds me of BABYMETAL's guitarists. They used to use sparkly pink guitars, around 2015-ish.
you gotta checkout Zach wylde playing on a hello kitty toy guitar over on loudwire.
I'm gonna be honest. I didn't hear almost any change switching between cabs or which speaker is miced and the incredibly subtle differences is did hear are easily in the realm of margin of error for mic placement. The biggest difference I heard was between the solid state and tube amps and then swapping out the speakers.
That test blew my mind. Thanks for doing this! question: would room response/ noise have any impact on tone shift, or is the mic too close to the speaker for that to have an impact?
I think that if rooms acoustics plays a huge role when mixing on monitors, it should matter when recording cabs. If u record vocals on a shitty sounding room theyre gonna sound horrible, so isnt it the same with cabs?
I don’t own a 4x12 that only has one type of speaker in it. I have 2 veteran 30s from warehouse speakers and 2 Eminence DV-77s in one of my cabs for example. Throw two mics on it and you get drastic tone differences but also I get that low end clarity I love so much. To me the pickups and the speakers are two of the most important variables on how a rig sounds.
My observations over the years lead me a long time ago to realize the biggest impact is in the speaker and cab. The cab has less impact in a close mic'd situation from my experience, but definitely impacts the room sound. The speakers are the final filter before the mic or the ears.
On factor that Find makes a huge difference in recording with regard to the cab, is open back vs closed back.
Ive always felt like the “tone is in the hands” argument was more geared towards lead guitar stuff.
Specifically, generic bendy boomer blues rock lead
Or just SRV because if I played his guitar setup his way I'm probably not strong enough to squeeze out the notes and bends he gets :D
Awesome video Glenn! Would love to see a video on how big an impact your pick ups make. Not like a single coil/p90/humbucker thing but more of a humbucker vs humbucker type of video. I reckon that the tonal shift wouldn't be as huge as people think it would but I don't have the facilities to be able to do such an experiment myself. Be the people's hero!
I think pickups make a diff simply because they do “eq” by increasing or decreasing highs and lows
Watch Keith Merrow's comparison of different Seymour Duncan pickups videos or Tosin Abasi's pickup shootout.
They absolutely do make a difference. See various shootouts here on YT, the ola englund Seymour Duncan one comes to mind
@@xxxfallenseraphxx Ok so I watched this video and I stand corrected. Cheers for the recommendation
@@Callum-Morrison not a problem were all here to learn fam :) highly recommend ola's other videos as well, he puts out some incredible content specifically targeted at metal guitarists.
I think the phrase: "The Tone is in the Hands" is related to what an individual guitarist plays over a backingtrack. I mean there are only few things that are different in each player like bends vibratos and down or alternate picking for example, when they play the exact same piece.
How you palm-mute, how you do the harmonics, how hard you pick, do you make a lot of string noise. There's a lot of things
You can have the same guitar tone plus the individual expression and talent.
Totally true Glenn! Speakers and cabinets are the biggest determinant of your tone. Might I add that the other big thing to consider is pickup height and polepiece adjustment.
Back in the day (many days ago) there were more pronounced differences in equipment. As an example, early 80s Peavey gear all sounded like, well, Peavey. This was particularly true in their mixing boards, which certainly put a "tone" into things. the Peavey mark III, as an example, had such a tone difference that all the kings men and all the Klark Technics EQs in the world couldn't fix what it did to the sound.
One of the most important things that has happened in the time between is that most gear now is tested to meet a certain response level. Also, the "meta" solution for amps (and most pedals) have long since been figure out, so if you are building a tube amp you are going to do X, Y, and Z and you will get the best sound possible.
You are correct Glen, as the one place that is still as much art as science is in the speakers. We sort of know it all, but "as built" isn't always exactly the same, and cabinets do impart sonic qualities of their own. Combined with different speakers and set perhaps on a different floor surface, the results will vary strongly. It is still a mechanical process that we cannot control precisely enough to replicate perfectly.
I noticed i was getting less and less happy with my V30ies so I started blending them with T75s, and at this point, Im almost using the v30as a filler rather than the main source. Cant wait for those speaker demos man! Been looking to kick around some new tones.
I found the 75's to have a bit too much 'fizz' so I tried out the k100's and wow. The 75 and 30 blend well together if you like the traits of the 75.
@@tbirdpunk I have an Uberkab with v30s and t75s in an X pattern, and I have to agree, the T75 is too fizzy for me.
That's what I had done a decade ago with two of my cabs, one a Mesa slant 4x12 and an egnator 4x12. Mesa had V30s while the egnator had 75s. Both sounded great on their own but together sounded better. When I would use stereo effects with both cabs panned out I could tell which side had more mids so I swapped two speakers over to each other cab in an x pattern and each cab sounded super full and rounded out! Much better results when uses panned stereo delays and effects!
@@musek5048 yeah, the x pattern is great in the room. I do like to blend them with mics as well but placement seems really important with the T75s.
I think the "tone is in the fingers" is interpreted very differently by the different camps. In my opinion, when discussing this, we need to define our terms. Some people are very philosophical about it, others (like Glenn) are technical and scientific.
Good point here, dude. I also think you may have noticeable differences with other genres (yes, I know this is a metal channel). But clean tones may pick up more of a guitarist's nuances in their attack and other variables.
The thing is, there is a term that covers what people believe is in the hands and that term is not tone. Tone is not in the hands. Technique is in the hands. There is no interpretation. Although you are right, clearer use of terms would probably help settle this.
@@etherealessence I agree that the technique of the guitar player isn't part of the tone. To me, tone is determined by all the things between the fingers of the player and the soundwaves that come out of the speaker in the end.
But the way you play something can change how the end result sounds. You may pick way harder and with the edge of the pick than some other person. And to me, that's technique. But to a lot of people that's also part of the "tone".
So while I do agree with you, for many people it's not that clear cut. That's why I said we need to define our terms. That way we'll avoid a lot of meaningless arguments.
I've always interpreted "tone is in the fingers" in terms of playing style rather than actual timbre. If you try and imitate the style of another player, you will sound _exactly_ like them.
@@mrcoatsworth429 this is the problem with the modern world. We live in an age where incorrect facts are still correct because the people that believe them define terms incorrectly. For example, we've seen racist and fascist get twisted up so much they lost their very real meaning. Yes that's a bit of a tangent, but it is absolutely the same thing as people defining technique as tone and going around saying that it's in the hands. We have terms, yes some are nebulous like tone, but they all have common definitions. And pretty much every 'tone is in the hands' explanation I've seen had been about the player's technique. Why not just say that technique is in the hands, since that's what everyone seems to talk about and agree on?
That was awesome Glenn! But what about the pickups?? I was hoping you’d show us how much (or little) variations they can bring to the tone. Thanks again for all the tests! 👍
It's very minimal and can be tweaked easily using an EQ Pedal
That is if you are using different Humbuckers, but if you're using single coils then that's a different territory
On cleaner sounds (blues, country) there is a sound difference, but that difference seems to be reduced a lot when played in a highly distorted metal context.
It's probably the compression which prevents me from hearing any distinctions between speakers or cabinets - until I heard the speaker swaps in the same cab. The G12 EVH & Hempback combo war clearly was clearly superior in clarity and frequency range. I have recently been convince by others as to the impact of speaker selection. This video provides the best audio comparison I've found yet. Also, I am convinced that a hearing test of paired dissimilar speaker is necessary before purchase. Comparative analysis requires investment of time (and other resources). Thanks for sharing yours.
Hi Glen, the reason the SUNN 'Beta Lead' sounds so much more 'mid-laden' is easy to explain. 100% of tube amps have what is known as 'high output impedance speaker drive' (Constant Current or CC for short) and drives the speaker with equal power at all frequencies across the guitar range.. Older solid state guitar amps don't, they have 'low impedance speaker drive' and it's this difference that causes the middle-y tone! The lower impedance also 'damps' the speaker cone and causes their lower loudness too. Thankfully, it's also possible to retro-fit the CC to old SS amps, so many can be made to sound and feel exactly the same as a tube power amp! Many modern analogue SS amps now have CC already built in - the Peavey Bandit is just one, hence they're challenging tube amps big time.
According to EVH, back in the 70’s other guitarists that toured with Van Halen like Ted Nugent tried his Plexi rig and were utterly disappointed they couldn’t get close to what he got just by playing through it. In his case, how he and only he played literally was the source of his “tone”. According to him, of course.
Right… but who cares what EVH thinks? We should also listen to this booger eating nobody glenn fricker about tone! I mean, who am I gonna trust? The guy who changed modern guitar and influenced an entire culture? Or the UA-cam idiot who pretends to make records, but doesn’t make records? This is a tough one!
Did they use his guitar or their own though?
Ted played Ed’s Strat copy. I’ve read the interview. Which if you recall Ed was known to bulls:$+ thru.
I think, that was not the time of brutal HiGain amps. The less gain you have, the more dynamics are audible and also the specific "tone" of a guitarist. EVH did not only do the tapping and other thricks, he even played them very aggressive, not only with the pick, but also with the right tapping-hand. Of course it's true that the tone is in the hands! Glenn even admits it at 02:50 somehow. Well, if you are overlapping everything what could be audible with tons of higain, then there's no wonder that no one can spot the difference anymore. But that's ok for metal and really a cool thing to know.
@@joeblow1229 When you make Generic crap like Glenn does, yes there is hardly any difference.
Not going to lie, I was typing: "I feel like power chords with a lot of gain aren't the best way to show that tone's not in the hands", Right as you called me out for asking for "Blues licks" on a metal channel....well played, sir. Well played
Still, matter of fact I agree. When I'm asked to play the same riffs I play them completely different (as in another position, not using a pick, and the place where you hit the string in fact does make a huge difference). So showing four players perform the same movement would not make a difference but if the hands were doing something different then it most definitely would. One could argue it's not the same riff of course ..... but yep, that's when Glenn started ranting about blues licks LOL
I find "tone" has become more of a catch-all term rather than the objective meaning based on frequency. Often a players technique for transitioning between frets, strumming/picking , or note/chord combinations they habitually use as being their "tone"
In my opinion "the sound is in the hands" should be changed to: "the phrasing is in the hands".
I think poor guitar playing is equated to bad tone while good playing is equated to good tone when using the same set up by different guitarist playing the same riff.
PS: If people want to change the tone, maybe star using the TONE knob built in the guitar haha
I always took it to mean something similar to this. EVH is the originator of the phrase, I think, which was meant to obfuscate how he actually got his tone. Ty Tabor of King's X was also notoriously cagey about his gear back in the day, and it seems to me that both players' drive to hide their methods was meant to push other players to stop trying to copy their tone and be original.
@@j.w.herring3834 Yeah that's a really good point too. EVH would turn around during sections of his solos so people woulnd't see how he play them haha.
im glad you specified the clarity and articulation bit at the end of the first part, cause thats what i think when it comes to tone is in the hands. hands wont change amp sounds, but can sound articulated differently and that can make a lot of difference in the way your music is perceived
This was a very informative video, thank you! From my experience and a hard lesson learned in after about 20 years of home recording, I realised the single most important component was the cable and the jack I used. I never cared and bought the cheapest ones for years. Tried many different guitars, pickups, plugins, amps, rooms etc. Never got that result I’ve been seeking.
Just a couple of months ago I bought a top quality cable and a pair of quality jacks. Everything suddenly changed. I felt like I have lost decades trying to find the magic solution. Noise and weird pop outs are completely gone and whatever I play sounds like super professional. So, probably many people are just stuck in that very first step and they don’t get how people are recording such clean, rich and powerful guitar tones. I believe this is actually the second step - at least for me.
I was under the impression that the whole “tone is in the hands/fingers” was more about how you play your instrument rather than the exact timbre or characteristics of your recorded sound. As in “[insert famous artist] still sounds like themselves even if they play through cheap, shitty equipment. Their tone isn’t defined by their gear, *the tone is in their fingers*.”
The idea being that if someone can still sound like themselves through cheap equipment, you don’t need to focus too much on buying expensive gear, but instead prioritise your technique and style.
The only times I have heard tube changes make a noticeable difference is when you change TYPE of tube (and generally stuff like screen grid resistors and bias to suit) rather than brand etc. So changing from a short to long bottle 6L6, or from a 6L6 to an EL34, KT77, or whatever in the power section, or from 12AX7 to a 5751 in the preamp. Just changing from Sovtek to EHX doesn't do much. I have heard differences between brands, but they are subtle and generally mainly noticeable on clean tones.
”The tone is in the hands” would refer to phrasing, pinch harmonics and palm muting. All guitarists differ in technique.
If you would ask Yngwie Malmsteen, Zakk Wylde and Dimebag Darrell to play a short melody, I think you could probably blindtest guess them correctly, all other things equal.
@Lars Norberg well I guess you are right. I would just want to add that you will change the frequency content greatly by for example palm muting or pinch harmonics. It is not only phrasing and how enjoyable it is to listen to.
I followed the rabbit hole of trying out different speakers and I definitely don’t regret it. It has definitely a huge impact on the tone and I’ve found out some great amp/cab/speaker combinations. And I’m still experiencing…
Also the pickups.
By the way, a Gretsch Electromatic Centerblock would be a great "can you play metal on" addition to your series. The pickups on those are severely underrated.
Or even just a 335 style guitar with humbuckers, which is one of the most versatile guitars around.
You'd be very surprised how similar different pickups can sound. Overall pickups affect the tone more than say the wood, or tubes, but less than the amp does. Moving the same pickup to a different position will usually yield a bigger difference in tone than replacing the pickup.
However, after the amp, and speaker/mic/cab, I'd say the next biggest factor is the pickups.
They call them Black Top Broad’Tron. I have it on my Electromatic single-cut. Love the sound.
"We listen with our eyes" is something I completely agree with, when the Gibson fanboys see a 50s Les Paul with Burst finish, they immediately think it will sound otherworldly and better than anything else that is made, they don't take into the account that a 60 year old dead tree with titanic rusted hardware won't sound good without a good amp and speaker, definitely not without a good player.
And not all of them sound great. Some are just outright bad guitars. There's always that. You can't just buy a random vintage LP, even a 59 burst, and be guaranteed to get Pearly Gates or Greenie.
That's why ichita something, Tim Hanson and stuff are like the next guitar gods cause we're a bunch of begginers listening with our eyes, and I bet many of the shredders and sweeping picking guys can't play rhythm stuff like Billy Joel or James Hetfield, just blabLRARAMBLAARAM ...
Thanks for clearing up, which thing affects the tone how much.
I have a little nitpick: I find it hard to hear the differences if the riffs are changed that much while the parameters (like speakers) change. Is it possible to have the same riff with different parameters for the listening comparison?
Yeah I can confirm that ! I did some testing on my own (no on your level ofc). I asked eveybody I know to bring thier stuff and recorded with it. And the biggest difference was in the cabinet. So I got used V30's made in england, and it improved my sound by a LOT !
Because of your videos on the Celestion V30s i had mesa run my serial number to find out which version i had. Turns out my cab shipped in June 2001 so glad i have a good set of V30s.
Well yeah, when you dime out the gain to sound like angry bees and just chug away at power chords you are not going to get a lot of tone variation between players.
I agree with this
Did you watch the rest of the video?
even with cleaner tones, all you hear is variations in dynamics and rythm from player to player. When talking purely about tone (and not about the interpretation of a song, or music in itself), there's not much change.
If you let Bonamassa play his thing through Angus' rig, well.. he will sound like Bonamassa... playing Agus' rig..
It's all about making the distinction between the playing (that we often call "tone"), and the sound (that we often call... "tone").
Which proves the point.