Wickard v. Filburn Summary | quimbee.com

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 9 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @caiuswickersham
    @caiuswickersham 7 років тому +14

    This is the case that basically made the Commerce Clause a blank check to Congress.

  • @hucklesnook1848
    @hucklesnook1848 7 років тому +3

    Thank you so much for the video, it was very helpful with my assignment. I hope you're living it up somewhere, because you deserve it!!

  • @TooManyChoices1
    @TooManyChoices1 Рік тому

    This is why Wickard Vs Filburn is such an interesting case. The allotments and subsidies placed onto farmers (who are engaged in a federally regulated commodity production with limits), makes the decision “justified”, yet still insane as congress attempts to use the “aggregation principle” outside of its limited power to regulate “industry” against “individuals” not engaged in commerce through the interstate commerce clause. This is also why the Texas Suppressor freedom case is very interesting, as it will definitely end up referencing Wickard Vs Filburn but Wickard should not be used to validate the clear over reach of federal authority without the same subsidies/allotment numbers of the commodity(suppressors)and in light of the clear Second Amendment challenges. Will be a landmark case, just as Wickard Vs Filburn was. Quite the turning point/shift in American jurisprudence one way or the other. Freedom or Nullification of Rights through capricious use of unilaterally unauthorized authority 🤔!

  • @paulschrader1052
    @paulschrader1052 7 років тому +3

    Excellent narrative and very helpful in my Con law class. Thank you !

  • @galacticknight55544
    @galacticknight55544 2 роки тому +1

    I like to call this case "Wicked v. Filburn."

  • @jonathanbosco8458
    @jonathanbosco8458 2 роки тому

    Thank you for the video God bless and be safe

  • @brentdarrin1109
    @brentdarrin1109 26 днів тому

    I wonder if this would have applied back then to the Amish