My book about everything you need to know about the Supreme Court is now available! Amazon: amzn.to/3Jj3ZnS Bookshop (a collection of indie publishers): bookshop.org/books/the-power-of-and-frustration-with-our-supreme-court-100-supreme-court-cases-you-should-know-about-with-mr-beat/9781684810680 Barnes and Noble: www.barnesandnoble.com/w/the-power-of-our-supreme-court-matt-beat/1142323504?ean=9781684810680 Amazon UK: www.amazon.co.uk/s?k=the+power+of+our+supreme+court&crid=3R59T7TQ6WKI3&sprefix=the+power+of+our+supreme+courth%2Caps%2C381&ref=nb_sb_noss Mango: mango.bz/books/the-power-of-our-supreme-court-by-matt-beat-2523-b Target: www.target.com/p/the-power-of-our-supreme-court-by-matt-beat-paperback/-/A-86273023 Walmart: www.walmart.com/ip/The-Power-of-Our-Supreme-Court-How-the-Supreme-Court-Cases-Shape-Democracy-Paperback-9781684810680/688487495 Chapters Indigo: www.chapters.indigo.ca/en-ca/books/the-power-of-our-supreme/9781684810680-item.html?ikwid=The+Power+of+Our+Supreme+Court&ikwsec=Home&ikwidx=0#algoliaQueryId=eab3e89ad34051a62471614d72966b7e
I cannot imagine why not! Social Studies is simply about what happens in real life on a day to day basis. Oh! Maybe that's why they don't want you to know about it. These were real people, just as much as Taylor Swift or Donald Trump and why he can (legally) have three wives without beheading the second, or having the third die in childbirth.
Loveeee the Supreme Court Briefs series. I hate to sound like a broken record, but i NEED that United States v. Standard Oil of New Jersey video. Much love as always bro
I think you should cover the one allowing the sale of violent video games. I forgot which one that was called. I disagree with the decision but I still think it's interesting.
Mr Beat I recently discovered your channel and I've been watching almost every single one of your videos, which are very helpful. I hope you read this and keep uo the good work on your videos.
I've been watching your videos a lot lately, and they have helped me decide that I want to change my major and pursue a degree in secondary education social studies and become a history teacher. I always enjoyed history when I was in high school, but your videos have helped me realize that I have a true passion for it. Thank you!
Mr. Beat, thank you for giving me a serious interest in teaching history. I’ve always been a history fanatic, but you have inspired me to take the initiative to educate people about how are history has made us into the country, people, and world we live in. Even though you’ll probably never see this, Thank you, seriously
That would be extremely difficult. Hindsight being 20/20 we all know how we'd vote now but some races could be tough to decide if you imagine yourself in the past ignoring what you know now. Great idea though!
Being an international student (India -> Iowa) in the US and not knowing in detail about its history (short but interesting due to the democratic roots which is helping the world). I really find your videos very interesting entertaining and deeply knowledgeable. I love culture, history, language and to know why we are the way we are and how the way we act on issues in present situation connect to the past. Your videos have helped me in the last 2 years to understand the presidential elections well with the series, but supreme court briefs are my favorite 😍. I share them with my USA and international friends to discuss as well. Wish I had a history teacher like you in my class, but thanks to youtube you are teaching the whole world!!! I wish I can visit you and talk with you someday! Really admire your work. And enjoyed the comparison of Ames vs the city in kansas you did. It was funny but the rivalry is true!
I'm also looking into Native Americas history and it's fascinating. Was able to pay a visit to Pueblo last summer but this year's plan to attend powwow got screwed. Well next time
I really appreciate the nice comments and am so happy my videos have been enjoyable for you. My ultimate goal is to create a new series about all of the major Native American nations!
Great video! Potter Stewart had a classic line in his dissent saying the law was "uncommonly silly", which has been cited by future justices to explain how the constitution doesn't always protect from silly laws.
Here man, but remember this, opposition to the SCOTUS is strong and mounting. Every pro-choice ballot initiative has won since the decision, even in conservative states. The pro-choice crowd has ALWAYS been bigger than the pro-life crowd. Don't let their propaganda scare you too much. That's just what it is - propaganda.
These are my favorite videos of yours! It's a shame they don't get more views. Have you considered making videos on highly important non-presidential elections in American history?
You may see me commenting a lot, if you get notifications, on your older videos. I don’t know why I do it… I guess it’s just to let you know how much I appreciate you and your objectivity on these subjects. I wish I had found you over five years ago when you started on UA-cam. I would have been better informed sooner. Now I’m having to catch up on all the history I never learned, or was lied to about, and it’s incredibly overwhelming. But you make it a little more bearable.
I agree with the verdict, as an outsider the American court system seems so sporadic and politically charged but then again there is no way to remove political bias from judges. Honestly it's so much more entertaining to see American supereme court cases because of the amount of arguments and discussions that go on among the judges and among the lawyer.
Yeah it has always been a political branch of government. However, I tend to respect the Supreme Court more due to their generally deep knowledge of the law and the fact that they don't ever have to worry about getting elected.
I was actually asked to list the number of times the word "privacy" was written in the Constitution in a college assignment. Couldn't find it anywhere.
@@iammrbeat For those times that it has been used with respect to social movements, it's caused massive divide amongst the American people (I'm looking right at Roe v Wade) even to this day. I'm not so sure that making every right implicitly a constitutional right is a good thing.
@@Romulus1001 Well, the concept of there being rights not explicitly mentioned is sound. The real issue is widespread disagreement over some of which rights should and shouldn't be implicitly allowed by the 9th Amendment. However, the only way to fix that is to spell out every single right and how they should interact with other rights, but that's a fool's errand and why we need the 9th Amendment in the first place. Also, don't forget that the 9th Amendment can also be used in favor of the Federal Government. For example, the Constitution doesn't explicitly allow the Government to buy land, but here we are with the Louisiana Purchase, Florida, the Gadsden Purchase, Alaska, etc.
@Compucles yes and the purpose of stating that via the 9th amendment isn't so that it gives license to anyone to claim it as an implied constitutional right thereby circumventing and nullifying the amendment provision built into the constitution, though that is how it's been used in the last 80 years. Rights can be passed via statute at the state level and federal level if it compels the people to make them via convincing debate. If it can't get passed as a law, then it's evident that there isn't enough support for it politically. And if it gets passed and it turns out to be bad law, then they can just as easily repeal it.
@@Romulus1001 Like I said, it would be a fool's errand to try and brute force every single needed right in every situation into Constitutional or Federal Law. It just isn't possible to do things that way, especially when some rights conflict with other rights in certain situations.
Many! One of them reversed an earlier case which is the reason there's any strong federal labor laws. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Darby_Lumber_Co.
@@OpinionesDeJACCsOpinions I think American labor law has very little influence Brazilian labour law, so we don't end up hearing a lot about those cases here. But our Supreme Court very often applies the American doctrines on civil rights and criminal law.
@@sohopedeco Well that's cool, I don't remember reading that much about Brazilian federalism nor read any about your country's constitution. However, I do know other federations took notes and based many of their constitutions at least partially from the U.S. Constitution. Basically all the parts that just make sense!
Hello mate , I am an conservative, but I enjoy watching your videos, because they provide a different point of view. I may disagree with you on many topics, but keep doing what you do because your videos have a perfect mix of humour and history
Potter Stewart wrote in his dissent, "This is an uncommonly stupid law, but I believe it is at least constitutional." Worthy of a man who knows smut when he sees it!
Might be a stupid question but how easy is it to appeal something up to the Supreme Court? Because in all these videos they just do it but there’s no way they can hear every case
I actually wrote a concurring argument in one of my law classes. I hated the reasoning in the case. I don't think the word "woman" is mentioned a single time. In the reasoning you can definitely spot signs of the time.
That might be because it applies equally to men, as well. They deserve the right to use condoms, which certainly count as an "instrument to prevent conception."
President During this time: Lyndon B. Johnson Chief Justice: Earl Warren Argued March 29-30, 1965 Decided June 7, 1965 Case Duration: 70 Days Decision: 7-2 in favor of Griswold (Stewart, Black for Connecticut.)
I always wondered about this, but in Supreme Court cases that have the State name, county name, or United States as plaintiff or defendant, who represents them?
Griswold is still in the balance how many years later. While birth rates have slightly dropped & RTL’S cite abortion as our killing “babies”, which is incorrect terminology, no one stopped to think about the huge loss off life due to disease. COVID took the lives of young otherwise healthy people as well as those with underlying conditions. Where is the uproar over that? Humor, that has grown quiet. The right to plan your timing to start a family is a matter of privacy now as much as it was when SCOTUS ruled originally. Thank you Mr Beat!!!!
This has nothing to do with Supreme Court underwear but could you please do a video on the Civil War in the western theater if you haven’t yet? That would be great!
I went here looking for recent comments. They're real, conservatives who wanna ban contraceptives are real. They denied it for years but they're coming out now.
@@Matt_Fields_29 I know they are. They have been around sense they were invented. Its gross and actually really fascist to want to ban them, totally against what the GOP is supposed to "stand for" this isnt going to end well if roe is actually overturned.
My book about everything you need to know about the Supreme Court is now available!
Amazon: amzn.to/3Jj3ZnS
Bookshop (a collection of indie publishers): bookshop.org/books/the-power-of-and-frustration-with-our-supreme-court-100-supreme-court-cases-you-should-know-about-with-mr-beat/9781684810680
Barnes and Noble: www.barnesandnoble.com/w/the-power-of-our-supreme-court-matt-beat/1142323504?ean=9781684810680
Amazon UK: www.amazon.co.uk/s?k=the+power+of+our+supreme+court&crid=3R59T7TQ6WKI3&sprefix=the+power+of+our+supreme+courth%2Caps%2C381&ref=nb_sb_noss
Mango: mango.bz/books/the-power-of-our-supreme-court-by-matt-beat-2523-b
Target: www.target.com/p/the-power-of-our-supreme-court-by-matt-beat-paperback/-/A-86273023
Walmart: www.walmart.com/ip/The-Power-of-Our-Supreme-Court-How-the-Supreme-Court-Cases-Shape-Democracy-Paperback-9781684810680/688487495
Chapters Indigo: www.chapters.indigo.ca/en-ca/books/the-power-of-our-supreme/9781684810680-item.html?ikwid=The+Power+of+Our+Supreme+Court&ikwsec=Home&ikwidx=0#algoliaQueryId=eab3e89ad34051a62471614d72966b7e
Mrs. Beat! How could you say that???
Well she did give me the entire basement so I'm a lucky man.
She's no fun anymore.
Posters for geek man caves! I’ve got a couple!
@@iammrbeat bro how do I get a deal like that? My partner would only give me the corner of a room. Doesn't help we don't have a basement but still.
"These useful charts are so useful!"
Never thought a Social Studies teacher would be one of my favorite channels
Aw that really means a lot!
I cannot imagine why not! Social Studies is simply about what happens in real life on a day to day basis. Oh! Maybe that's why they don't want you to know about it. These were real people, just as much as Taylor Swift or Donald Trump and why he can (legally) have three wives without beheading the second, or having the third die in childbirth.
Can’t wait for 2020 Presidential Elections in American history.
February he said
Same
Man that videos gonna have to be twice as long this year
It’ll be a doozy
@@xxbeans93xx76 3 months after Biden won. He’s so lazy i stg
I can't believe I hadn't covered this one yet. Which Supreme Court case should I cover for this series next?
Do Gonzales v. Raich,
Or Bostock V. Clayton county
Or New York v. United States
Or Nixon v. United States
Clay v United States
Also great video btw
Loveeee the Supreme Court Briefs series. I hate to sound like a broken record, but i NEED that United States v. Standard Oil of New Jersey video. Much love as always bro
I think you should cover the one allowing the sale of violent video games. I forgot which one that was called. I disagree with the decision but I still think it's interesting.
Pierson v Ray is about qualified immunity. It’s very interesting and relevant
I’m flattered that you assume that I’m a history teacher!
lol well you could do it if you wanted to!
Good job Mr.Beat! Your videos are always informative and entertaining! Thank you, and keep doing what you do!
Thank you so much. :D
Mr Beat I recently discovered your channel and I've been watching almost every single one of your videos, which are very helpful. I hope you read this and keep uo the good work on your videos.
I really appreciate the kind words, Hugo!
I've been watching your videos a lot lately, and they have helped me decide that I want to change my major and pursue a degree in secondary education social studies and become a history teacher. I always enjoyed history when I was in high school, but your videos have helped me realize that I have a true passion for it. Thank you!
Yay! I'm so excited for you. You're going to love it!
All your videos have a 10th grade US history teacher vibe and I am very much here for it
lol well this makes sense since I teach 10th grade U.S. history
I see you working up to more recent cases, and I love it.
Most of the more impactful and interesting cases are from the last 100 years. :D
@@iammrbeat Please do a video on Trump v. New York when Biden becomes president.
You should do a video briefly discussing all 27 amendments and their history like why they were introduced, I love your videos!
Saw one of your videos because my history teacher showed the class one of them and now I can't stop watching them. Great video!
Mr. Beat, thank you for giving me a serious interest in teaching history. I’ve always been a history fanatic, but you have inspired me to take the initiative to educate people about how are history has made us into the country, people, and world we live in. Even though you’ll probably never see this, Thank you, seriously
Do a video on how you would vote in every presidential election before your birth.
That might be a good livestream idea perhaps? Thanks for the great suggestion.
@@iammrbeat Just a thought.
That would be extremely difficult. Hindsight being 20/20 we all know how we'd vote now but some races could be tough to decide if you imagine yourself in the past ignoring what you know now. Great idea though!
@@johnsmith-wc8gs OK Mr. Funkiller.
@@historyhub9211 no he has a good point
Loving the videos Mr. Beat! Keep up the great work
Thank you Bryan!
Man I have watched all of 58 supreme court briefs in one-day dude pleaseeeeeeee make these more often because I'm addicted keep up the good work :D
3:37
Anyone else think this was going to transition to a VPN advert?
lol instead I started hyping up a bunch of dorky history posters
@@iammrbeat Not dorky at all! Extremely useful and I just ordered one using your link, hope that helps man! Thank you for all that you do!💕
Being an international student (India -> Iowa) in the US and not knowing in detail about its history (short but interesting due to the democratic roots which is helping the world).
I really find your videos very interesting entertaining and deeply knowledgeable.
I love culture, history, language and to know why we are the way we are and how the way we act on issues in present situation connect to the past.
Your videos have helped me in the last 2 years to understand the presidential elections well with the series, but supreme court briefs are my favorite 😍.
I share them with my USA and international friends to discuss as well.
Wish I had a history teacher like you in my class, but thanks to youtube you are teaching the whole world!!!
I wish I can visit you and talk with you someday! Really admire your work.
And enjoyed the comparison of Ames vs the city in kansas you did. It was funny but the rivalry is true!
I'm also looking into Native Americas history and it's fascinating. Was able to pay a visit to Pueblo last summer but this year's plan to attend powwow got screwed. Well next time
I really appreciate the nice comments and am so happy my videos have been enjoyable for you. My ultimate goal is to create a new series about all of the major Native American nations!
Great video! Potter Stewart had a classic line in his dissent saying the law was "uncommonly silly", which has been cited by future justices to explain how the constitution doesn't always protect from silly laws.
So awesome of you to bring that up, and thanks for the kind words. :D
Keep these coming, when I watch the intro I always crack up
I hope to do many more in 2021!
Another live stream idea I'd like to see would be a ranking/opinion/ tier list on every US vice president and/or first lady
Heck yeah
Who’s here after the overturn of roe v wade? Scared for what’s next.
I can't believe this is happening!!!
Thanks to the algorithm.
Here man, but remember this, opposition to the SCOTUS is strong and mounting. Every pro-choice ballot initiative has won since the decision, even in conservative states. The pro-choice crowd has ALWAYS been bigger than the pro-life crowd. Don't let their propaganda scare you too much. That's just what it is - propaganda.
That was really quick and informative.
Good stuff!
Appreciate it!
These are my favorite videos of yours! It's a shame they don't get more views. Have you considered making videos on highly important non-presidential elections in American history?
You may see me commenting a lot, if you get notifications, on your older videos. I don’t know why I do it… I guess it’s just to let you know how much I appreciate you and your objectivity on these subjects. I wish I had found you over five years ago when you started on UA-cam. I would have been better informed sooner. Now I’m having to catch up on all the history I never learned, or was lied to about, and it’s incredibly overwhelming. But you make it a little more bearable.
I missed Supreme Court Briefs. Thanks for the upload!
Well thanks for supporting them!
I'm calling it - Two years later: California vs Texas
I already made that video. :D
Thanks mr beat! now I have something to do during Christmas Break
Watch all 57 of my other Supreme Court Briefs episodes? :D
@@iammrbeat yes sir!
When I first heard of this case, I thought it was a precursor to Roe Vs Wade
Well it actually was. :D
Mr. Beat, you should cover FCC v. Fox Television Stations for the next Supreme Court Briefs video.
Hey, Mr. Beat! Can you please do a "Supreme Court Briefs" video on FCC v. AT&T?
I agree with the verdict, as an outsider the American court system seems so sporadic and politically charged but then again there is no way to remove political bias from judges. Honestly it's so much more entertaining to see American supereme court cases because of the amount of arguments and discussions that go on among the judges and among the lawyer.
Yeah it has always been a political branch of government. However, I tend to respect the Supreme Court more due to their generally deep knowledge of the law and the fact that they don't ever have to worry about getting elected.
I like your "Supreme court underwear" series.
😆 thank you
this video came in handy considering the overturning of roe yesterday
You're now getting close to 300k!!!
Mr. Beat I love all your videos they are educational and fun to watch. Do you show these videos to your students?
Some of them, yes, but my students get bored of me. lol
For Supreme Court briefs, can you do
US v. Lopez
US v. Brignoni-ponce
Gonzales v. Raich
I hope you will do supreme case new york vs new jersey.
That one has been on my list for quite awhile.
Thanks for uploading yet another video, can't wait to watch it later
Hope you enjoy it!
Could you talk about Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad vs. Chicago? That’s an important one.
Mr Beat,
UA-cam search does not accept "Mr Beat," but your videos show up for "Supreme Court briefs. "
NEW SUPREME COURT BREIF! Yay my favorite series!
Yay!
Mr. Beat, I have a suggestion for a future upload.
Los Angeles, CA compared to Phoenix, AZ. They are practically sister cities, at this point.
Topic Request for Mr Beat: History of Martial Law in the USA.
Arkansas and Louisiana compared, please?
Ah, PT Barnum, the original business con man turned politician. As a CT native, glad that we lost this one!
Fun fact, Mrs. Beat is related to him! lol
How about a tierlist of Supreme Court justices?
I feel like I'm not ready for something like that quite yet.
All good!
Next Supreme Court Brief recommendation : Brady v. Maryland
Love your informative video. It really helped me to understand Us constitution better.
not a teacher but a life long learning buff
Fantastic. I'm glad you're here. :D
You should do a video on Presidential Libraries and Museums.
Love this series!!
Thanks!
You make great content!!
Thanks!
No Problem!
Nice info Mr Beat!
Thanks for watching
Omg I love this series
Woohoo :D
Yay! It’s back
After a looong break.
It’s interesting how we’ve gone many centuries with so many things that we could consider obvious in today’s society be so recent like equal rights
Mos def!
I was actually asked to list the number of times the word "privacy" was written in the Constitution in a college assignment. Couldn't find it anywhere.
I think a Supreme Court brief on Miller v. California would be interesting
Hey could you do a comparison of Los Angeles and San Francisco please?
holy hell our government teacher showed us this and I was SO close to saying “IS THAT MR BEAT?”
The classic "Let's cite the 9th amendment if my so-called rights aren't explicitly stated in the constitution" slight-of-hand, works every time 😎
I honestly am surprised it hasn't been used more throughout American history.
@@iammrbeat For those times that it has been used with respect to social movements, it's caused massive divide amongst the American people (I'm looking right at Roe v Wade) even to this day. I'm not so sure that making every right implicitly a constitutional right is a good thing.
@@Romulus1001 Well, the concept of there being rights not explicitly mentioned is sound. The real issue is widespread disagreement over some of which rights should and shouldn't be implicitly allowed by the 9th Amendment. However, the only way to fix that is to spell out every single right and how they should interact with other rights, but that's a fool's errand and why we need the 9th Amendment in the first place.
Also, don't forget that the 9th Amendment can also be used in favor of the Federal Government. For example, the Constitution doesn't explicitly allow the Government to buy land, but here we are with the Louisiana Purchase, Florida, the Gadsden Purchase, Alaska, etc.
@Compucles yes and the purpose of stating that via the 9th amendment isn't so that it gives license to anyone to claim it as an implied constitutional right thereby circumventing and nullifying the amendment provision built into the constitution, though that is how it's been used in the last 80 years. Rights can be passed via statute at the state level and federal level if it compels the people to make them via convincing debate. If it can't get passed as a law, then it's evident that there isn't enough support for it politically. And if it gets passed and it turns out to be bad law, then they can just as easily repeal it.
@@Romulus1001 Like I said, it would be a fool's errand to try and brute force every single needed right in every situation into Constitutional or Federal Law. It just isn't possible to do things that way, especially when some rights conflict with other rights in certain situations.
1965 was not that long ago. It is crazy to me to think that the State had any business knowing if I am doing the nasty to make kids or not.
Indeed. So many of the social changes of the 1960s that we take for granted today were considered "radical" back then.
so weird seeing you in the classroom
I wonder if there's any Supreme Court case on labor laws, labor unions, strike rights...
Many! One of them reversed an earlier case which is the reason there's any strong federal labor laws.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Darby_Lumber_Co.
@@OpinionesDeJACCsOpinions I think American labor law has very little influence Brazilian labour law, so we don't end up hearing a lot about those cases here. But our Supreme Court very often applies the American doctrines on civil rights and criminal law.
@@sohopedeco
Well that's cool, I don't remember reading that much about Brazilian federalism nor read any about your country's constitution.
However, I do know other federations took notes and based many of their constitutions at least partially from the U.S. Constitution. Basically all the parts that just make sense!
Hello mate , I am an conservative, but I enjoy watching your videos, because they provide a different point of view. I may disagree with you on many topics, but keep doing what you do because your videos have a perfect mix of humour and history
mr beat teaching us better at history than our school and im lovin’ it😇🌈
Aw thanks so much!
Good content Mr beat
Thanks Reyna!
Can you do a video on US East Coast and West Coast compared? Thanks for the great content on your channel
Best series!
Please do a video on best and worst First Ladies .
Great suggestion!
Potter Stewart wrote in his dissent, "This is an uncommonly stupid law, but I believe it is at least constitutional." Worthy of a man who knows smut when he sees it!
Might be a stupid question but how easy is it to appeal something up to the Supreme Court? Because in all these videos they just do it but there’s no way they can hear every case
It's not that easy. Part of it is indeed luck.
Please do Paramount pictures V United States since it’s been repealed 2 months ago
Please do Jacobson vs Massachusetts. Extremely relevant with COVID-19 these days.
I already did you silly goose
Ope. That's my bad. I guess this history teacher still has some history homework to catch up on haha.
You should make videos about the amendments, like how Congress voted, how popular it was, when and why it was made, etc.
I do plan on an Amendments series!
4:27 I just love the disappointed look.
Merry Xmas!
I actually wrote a concurring argument in one of my law classes. I hated the reasoning in the case. I don't think the word "woman" is mentioned a single time. In the reasoning you can definitely spot signs of the time.
That might be because it applies equally to men, as well. They deserve the right to use condoms, which certainly count as an "instrument to prevent conception."
By an odd coincidence, UA-cam's algorithm decided to show me an ad for a birth control service right after the video.
I'm not a history teacher I'm actually a student but your videos are great
Very much like the usefulness of these court cases. You ought to do the one with corporations are people
Are you talking Citizens United or Santa Clara County v. Southern?
President During this time: Lyndon B. Johnson
Chief Justice: Earl Warren
Argued March 29-30, 1965
Decided June 7, 1965
Case Duration: 70 Days
Decision: 7-2 in favor of Griswold (Stewart, Black for Connecticut.)
I needed this
Watching this so I know whats coming after roe v wade was overturned
Texas vs. Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and Georgia. It will be a very short video.
A Turtle approved the use of birth control.
Thank you for approving this, A Turtle.
I see you anywhere and everywhere.
I approve your approvals.
I always wondered about this, but in Supreme Court cases that have the State name, county name, or United States as plaintiff or defendant, who represents them?
When it’s the US government it’s the solicitor general or designee. Many states also have solicitor general as well.
MORE SUPREME COURT BRIEFS
I definitely plan on it for 2021.
Griswold is still in the balance how many years later. While birth rates have slightly dropped & RTL’S cite abortion as our killing “babies”, which is incorrect terminology, no one stopped to think about the huge loss off life due to disease. COVID took the lives of young otherwise healthy people as well as those with underlying conditions. Where is the uproar over that? Humor, that has grown quiet.
The right to plan your timing to start a family is a matter of privacy now as much as it was when SCOTUS ruled originally.
Thank you Mr Beat!!!!
Mr Beat, you can't say PT Barnum was involved then not briefly (see what I did there) explain why.
Canbyou make a Supreme Court Briefs on Reynolds v United States
This has nothing to do with Supreme Court underwear but could you please do a video on the Civil War in the western theater if you haven’t yet? That would be great!
Hey Mrs. Beat!!
Oh hey!
Yay a comment for me!
Hey quick question when are you going to make a presidential election recap of this year?
After the inauguration
The Warren Court was so extremely based.
They were pretty impactful.
Watch, after roe is officially overturned, the GOP will be going for this next.
I went here looking for recent comments. They're real, conservatives who wanna ban contraceptives are real. They denied it for years but they're coming out now.
@@Matt_Fields_29 I know they are. They have been around sense they were invented. Its gross and actually really fascist to want to ban them, totally against what the GOP is supposed to "stand for" this isnt going to end well if roe is actually overturned.
M Beat do a Video of
Connecticut and Rhode Island Compared
or Connecticut or Massachusetts
I'll probably do Connecticut vs. Massachusetts
This man knows me. I'm a history dork.