I already have the Sony 18-105. It works well for outdoors, but I have used it for video indoors for filming my grandson in a kid’s theatre performance. Takes decent photos outdoors and the zoom help me get a reasonable photo of an eagle perched high in a tree. I have the Sigma 30mm, F1.4 but don’t use it much because it’s not wide enough for indoor family events. For that I use the Sony 24mm, F1.8. I might want to consider the Sony 11mm or Sigma 16 mm and the Tamron 17-70 to complement my lens’ library. Thanks for your video. I’m trying to decide if I want to update to a new/different lens or to move from my a6500 to the a6700. I want to stay with APSC simply because of smaller sizes than full frame lens. Of course, if someone gave me the upcoming A7Cii, I wouldn’t complain.
That 18-105 is a sleeper. Even at f4 I have been pleasantly surprised by its versatility. That internal zoom with the zoom rocker is an excellent feature as well. Makes those in-camera zooms a lot easier 😎
What about the Sigma 18-50? Struggling between the Sigma and the Tamron 17-70. Really like how small the Sigma is but also really like the extra zoom on the Tamron
Hey Keith, nice to see another Toronto creator. I think you might be mistaken you had the 23mm 1.4 back in the day. It only came out this year in April (I bought one and immediately broke it lol). The 56 is quite a bit older. You probably meant the 30mm and 16mm with your a6400?
I have the Sony 18-105, Sigma 16 and Tamron 17-70. The Sony 18-105 is great for video because of the power zoom which works on my Sony tripod that connects to my A6600 and operates all the functions from the handle. However it's kind of slow and soft for photography. I use the Tamron 17-70 f/2.8 as a general walk around lens and for indoor event photos. However since I got it I rarely use my Sigma 16 anymore. I love the 16 but it's kind of redundant. I also have a Tamron 70-180mm f/2.8 DI III VXD which is very fast and sharp. I would like to get the Sony 11mm wide angle for interiors and a Sony E 70-350mm f/4.5-6.3 G OSS lens for more reach on nature photography. That said, there are a lot of affordable used A7 3's out now that the A7 4 is out. I might even go for an A7R if I can get a good deal on one used. Some of my lenses are FE and with work on full frame or APS-C. Plus I bought a used Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III RXD by mistake, which I could keep because it's an FE lens. Another bonus is that the A7 series batteries are the same as the A6600 and A6700.
*I have the 16mm as I Bought that for My A6400 and also bought the 11mm as I did a test video with it on ZV-E10 and it's my Main Lens FOR that camera, never really thought about using it on my FX30 for a Vlogging lens. But I was lookin for a smaller alternative Lens TOO my Sigma 16mm and the 15mm was going to be it but since it's the same as the 16mm I'm now Looking into the 23mm*
They would definitely work in crop mode, if you spend your whole budget on a full frame body - APSC lenses could work until you have the budget for FF glass
A newbie question about lenses. I often find a very good price for a lens for my Sony ZV-E10 but it is made for a different mount (usually EF). Is it advisable to buy it and use an adapter or is it going to be a completely different lens this way?
Thanks for this. I just got the fx30 and wanted to know what lens to get. I have a A7IV as well and got the 28-75 tamron, which is great. But, its too zoomed in on the fx30. Will try the 17-70
Would definitely choose the Tamron 17-70 and Sigma 56mm along with sigma16mm. Appreciate your efforts in making videos like this one. Using the Sony fx30 with the Samyang 24mm T1.9 for the last 3 months and I am really enjoying shooting videos with it. However, not really enjoying the stills capability of this camera. Planning to upgrade to a full frame or to the new a6700 that recently launched as I am required to take a few stills in my line of work. When I do get my hands on a new camera capable of taking stills, then would get the 24-70mm from sigma. Hello from India!!
Thats right! In my mind the 56mm is still new for some reason! Even though it was released last year at this point. Time is flying! And the 23mm was released pretty recently. The 16mm is the "older" lens here, but still great for the money
I have the Sigma 16mm and the Viltrox 13mm f1.4 on a ZV-E10. In a direct comparison, the Viltrox has better autofocus precision and a significantly better manual focus (finer adjustment). The Sigma is a bit warmer in color, the Viltrox is a bit more analytical. In my opinion, the Viltrox is much sharper around the edges but has a little more vignetting. My other lenses are of course the Tamron 17-70. But I also bought the Tamron 18-300, which is an amazing budget zoom lens.
Literally just purchased the Tamron 17-70 and after 1 day of shooting I'm definitely pleased. However i'm attempting to get into more sports videography and still searching for a more budget 70-200mm lens that is comparable to the tamron/sony offerings. Would you suggest just picking up the sony 18-105 or saving up to get something in the $1000 range like the tamron 70-180?
tamron 70-180 would definitely be a good choice, I dont own one but ive borrowed it from my lens and from my schools yearbook team. sharp and works great for sport photography/videography
Those are the anchor points for the peak design neck strap. I have both the thicker and thinner one and love them. The thinner one is much easier to travel with, the wider one is more comfortable for longer periods of time if you have a heavy camera
If it was 2 of them, ignoring the fact i already have the 16mm sigma and 18-105 Sony. I would pick the tameron 17-70. That extra 2.8f stop plus oss im hoping would one up my sony zoom. Second would be the 11mm sony, for the extra wide shots which i dont have anything to cover currently. In an ideal world i think would prefer a 13mm lens but once you use active stabilisation probably the 11mm is about right. Thanks for the video!
I have 2 of the lenses you mentioned. The 56 sigma and 16mm sigma. Have them for my Sony a6300. Really want to upgrade to the Sony a6700. Do you think it worth upgrading to?
I havent used the Sigma 18-50, but I went with the Tamron 17-70. Slightly wider was negligible, but the 20mm on the longer side is what sold me on this lens. I find myself filming either at the widest end, or 50-70mm so I went with the Tamron. I'll have to check out the sigma 18-50 sometime though
@@keith-knittelIn comparison of performance and image quality over 18-50 mm range the sigma edges out the tammy but for some 1mm wide and 20mm more reach might be significant. The other striking thing about the Sigma is how well it combines with the any sonya6.... cam. A formidable lightweight combo for carry everywhere!
the sigma primes have horrible focus breathing so unusable for video in my opinion. any idea of alternatives that are reasonable(not GM)? I know the Sony 35 1.8 is good. and viltrox is ok. what els?
@@kiwimike2330 I was hoping to pair the 56 1.4 with the FX30 as a third cam in my studio to provide a close shot of a video podcaster using AF. So no manual focus racks. Do you think the ‘horrible focus breathing’ makes it ‘unusable for video’ in this case because this is the only con I can see for a perfect set up?
@@smallbizdigitalmedia The 56mm is my go to lens on the main camera for talking heads. Providing there’s the space, otherwise the 30mm is great too for tighter locations.
@@jeremyg9305Sigma is not compensated. Only Sony is compensated (not even sure if all Sony). Indeed I find the focus breathing of my Sigma 30 1.4 pretty visible on video shots. Probably the lens not designed for video just for photo.
Hey dusty, i am wondering to know more about your issue here. Because i own a6700 and i want to buy tamron 17-70 too but im afraid it will make jumping frames😢
Informative & interesting. My preference would be the Sigma 56mm and Sony 11mm. That would provide some decent coverage choices. Looking forward to more of your videos 😀.
Havent used the a6700, but when I had my a6500 I found myself using a lot of primes so I could use them wide open when the lighting was poor. Would recommend checking out some primes if you're shooting in low light
I have the Tamron 17-70MM and im looking for an alternative. At 70MM F2.8, the contrast is total garbage. Im constantly having to step down to F4 ot 5.6 to get the image sharp again. I thought it was my camera, but I tried other copies and it has the same problem. Contrast around bright objects.
There are cheaper lenses, but I feel like these ones are the best image quality to price - if you have any suggestions let me know. I love testing out new lenses
The more I used the Tamron 17-70 the more I grew to hate it. It's not a bad lens but it does the FX30 no favors. Also bang for buck primes... Viltrox kicks ass all day.
@@wouldoox8024 The VC is problematic for shooting video and you can't turn it off. It literally flips out if you zoom anything but slowly... and to be honest 2.8 it's just not fast enough on a APSC to get the best look from the camera. Better to get a used Sigma 18-35 f1.8 with adapter.
@@cameragod1Hey there, i am wondering to know more about your issue here. Because i own a6700 and i want to buy tamron 17-70 too but im afraid it will make jumping frames
@@igLEON it was a few things. I just don't think it's a good lens for video. I've now got a used Sony 18-105. it's f4 but the power-zoom and parfocal ability make it better to use and if I want a more cinematic look I go with the Sigma 18-35 f1.8 or primes.
Sorry but yes. With great consideration, photography is one of the most expensive hobbies. From cameras ranging from 2k-3k dollars in some places, with most lenses costing around 1-2k. 700-1k is considered cheap to those lenses which are 2k from tamron, sony, and sigma. Now this isnt to demotivate you from your hobby, but is an advisory or reminder. Keep up the photos with that you got!!
i would pick 17-70 tamron
Killing it on the thumbnails bro!
Thanks man! 🙌🙌🙌
I already have the Sony 18-105. It works well for outdoors, but I have used it for video indoors for filming my grandson in a kid’s theatre performance. Takes decent photos outdoors and the zoom help me get a reasonable photo of an eagle perched high in a tree. I have the Sigma 30mm, F1.4 but don’t use it much because it’s not wide enough for indoor family events. For that I use the Sony 24mm, F1.8. I might want to consider the Sony 11mm or Sigma 16 mm and the Tamron 17-70 to complement my lens’ library. Thanks for your video. I’m trying to decide if I want to update to a new/different lens or to move from my a6500 to the a6700. I want to stay with APSC simply because of smaller sizes than full frame lens. Of course, if someone gave me the upcoming A7Cii, I wouldn’t complain.
That 18-105 is a sleeper. Even at f4 I have been pleasantly surprised by its versatility. That internal zoom with the zoom rocker is an excellent feature as well. Makes those in-camera zooms a lot easier 😎
3:31 finally someone mentioned that! Thanks)
What about the Sigma 18-50? Struggling between the Sigma and the Tamron 17-70. Really like how small the Sigma is but also really like the extra zoom on the Tamron
I havent used the 18-50, I'll try to see if I can find one - I do like the extra reach on the 70mm side of this lens though.
Sigma 18-50 ftw
Sigma has much nicer bokeh.
sigman 18 50
17-70 lens is the same size as the Sigma 18-50 and camera combined. I sent the Tamron back cause I can’t imagine carrying that around all day!
I love my Sigma 16mm F1.4 but I also use my Tamron 35-150mm F2.0-2.8 with my a6700 & it works beautifully.
Hey Keith, nice to see another Toronto creator. I think you might be mistaken you had the 23mm 1.4 back in the day. It only came out this year in April (I bought one and immediately broke it lol). The 56 is quite a bit older. You probably meant the 30mm and 16mm with your a6400?
This
Love this. Could watch all day. Great info. Thank you!!
Thanks blaine!! 🙌
I have the Sony 18-105, Sigma 16 and Tamron 17-70. The Sony 18-105 is great for video because of the power zoom which works on my Sony tripod that connects to my A6600 and operates all the functions from the handle. However it's kind of slow and soft for photography.
I use the Tamron 17-70 f/2.8 as a general walk around lens and for indoor event photos. However since I got it I rarely use my Sigma 16 anymore. I love the 16 but it's kind of redundant.
I also have a Tamron 70-180mm f/2.8 DI III VXD which is very fast and sharp.
I would like to get the Sony 11mm wide angle for interiors and a Sony E 70-350mm f/4.5-6.3 G OSS lens for more reach on nature photography.
That said, there are a lot of affordable used A7 3's out now that the A7 4 is out. I might even go for an A7R if I can get a good deal on one used. Some of my lenses are FE and with work on full frame or APS-C. Plus I bought a used Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III RXD by mistake, which I could keep because it's an FE lens.
Another bonus is that the A7 series batteries are the same as the A6600 and A6700.
Best trio for Apsc 11mm sony +16-55mm sony + 56 mm sigma = king mode 👍
I love the apsc lenses, the 4 i always have for my fx30 and a6600 is the tamron 11-20, 17-70, sigma 16 and sirui 35mm anamorphic lens for apsc.
Solid lens line up! How do you like the apsc anamorphic? I've never used the sirui APSC 35mm
@@keith-knittel can’t complain for the price, I like the quality. I had to get it in MFT mount and buy Sirius e mount adapter.
*I have the 16mm as I Bought that for My A6400 and also bought the 11mm as I did a test video with it on ZV-E10 and it's my Main Lens FOR that camera, never really thought about using it on my FX30 for a Vlogging lens. But I was lookin for a smaller alternative Lens TOO my Sigma 16mm and the 15mm was going to be it but since it's the same as the 16mm I'm now Looking into the 23mm*
I'd pick the Sigma 16mm F1.4 & the Sony 18-105 F4, I plan on getting them later once I have the budget, would work well for my uses.
I use viltrox 13mm f1.4 for wide its really good too and will pair it with sigma 23mm f1.4 and 56mm f1.4 for prime
I havent used the Viltrox 13mm, but I'll add that to my list to test out!
Thess lenses would be great for the Sony A74 and Sony A7R5 when they are in crop mode
They would definitely work in crop mode, if you spend your whole budget on a full frame body - APSC lenses could work until you have the budget for FF glass
@@keith-knittel Gotta deal with the annoying 4K60p crop.
I would want the Sigma 23mm & 56mm or the 18-50mm f/2.8
The Sigma 30mm is a great choice, and can often eliminate the need for the 23 and the 56 (depending on your work).
A newbie question about lenses. I often find a very good price for a lens for my Sony ZV-E10 but it is made for a different mount (usually EF).
Is it advisable to buy it and use an adapter or is it going to be a completely different lens this way?
Any thoughts on using the Sony 18-135 on the A6700?
Too bir and too heavy
1:32 is that a scratch on the lens?
What about 18-50 f 2.8 sigma?
Thanks for this. I just got the fx30 and wanted to know what lens to get. I have a A7IV as well and got the 28-75 tamron, which is great. But, its too zoomed in on the fx30. Will try the 17-70
Nice - glad I could help out! Let me know what you think of the Tamron
Which two lenses would you choose? Tamron 17-70 & Sigma 56mm for me!
Would definitely choose the Tamron 17-70 and Sigma 56mm along with sigma16mm. Appreciate your efforts in making videos like this one. Using the Sony fx30 with the Samyang 24mm T1.9 for the last 3 months and I am really enjoying shooting videos with it. However, not really enjoying the stills capability of this camera. Planning to upgrade to a full frame or to the new a6700 that recently launched as I am required to take a few stills in my line of work. When I do get my hands on a new camera capable of taking stills, then would get the 24-70mm from sigma.
Hello from India!!
Viltrox 13 1.4, Sigma 18-50, Sigma 56
The Sigma 23mm f1.4 is newer than both the 56mm and the 16mm. It was released in April this year. Maybe you meant to say Sigma 30mm?
Thats right! In my mind the 56mm is still new for some reason! Even though it was released last year at this point. Time is flying! And the 23mm was released pretty recently. The 16mm is the "older" lens here, but still great for the money
@@keith-knittel Definitely. I have the Sigma 16mm and it's fantastic. All 5 Sigma contemporary lenses are great.
I have the Sigma 16mm and the Viltrox 13mm f1.4 on a ZV-E10. In a direct comparison, the Viltrox has better autofocus precision and a significantly better manual focus (finer adjustment). The Sigma is a bit warmer in color, the Viltrox is a bit more analytical. In my opinion, the Viltrox is much sharper around the edges but has a little more vignetting. My other lenses are of course the Tamron 17-70. But I also bought the Tamron 18-300, which is an amazing budget zoom lens.
Just found you today, but you earned the sub! Thanks for the info, I’m going to get to the sigma 16mm and the tam 10-20mm.
Is it ok to close the a6700 screen facing inward or will that scratch it up?
Literally just purchased the Tamron 17-70 and after 1 day of shooting I'm definitely pleased. However i'm attempting to get into more sports videography and still searching for a more budget 70-200mm lens that is comparable to the tamron/sony offerings. Would you suggest just picking up the sony 18-105 or saving up to get something in the $1000 range like the tamron 70-180?
tamron 70-180 would definitely be a good choice, I dont own one but ive borrowed it from my lens and from my schools yearbook team. sharp and works great for sport photography/videography
Nice vid thanks! Subbed.
What do you use for a neck strap. Are those little soft shackles part of it? Thanks.
Those are the anchor points for the peak design neck strap. I have both the thicker and thinner one and love them. The thinner one is much easier to travel with, the wider one is more comfortable for longer periods of time if you have a heavy camera
If it was 2 of them, ignoring the fact i already have the 16mm sigma and 18-105 Sony. I would pick the tameron 17-70. That extra 2.8f stop plus oss im hoping would one up my sony zoom. Second would be the 11mm sony, for the extra wide shots which i dont have anything to cover currently.
In an ideal world i think would prefer a 13mm lens but once you use active stabilisation probably the 11mm is about right.
Thanks for the video!
I have the Sony 11mm and it’s amazing
More of a prime person. Sigma 30 and 56 sound perfect for my needs.
I have 2 of the lenses you mentioned. The 56 sigma and 16mm sigma. Have them for my Sony a6300. Really want to upgrade to the Sony a6700. Do you think it worth upgrading to?
Yes.
Can someone please suggest which lens will be best for podcast for 2 to 3 people
If you don't mind, I take the Sigma 10-18mm
A great part of the Sony ecosystem is the choice of lenses. Youre able to chose which one is right for you
Im a newbie, with budget of 2000$, 1400$on the Sony A6700 and the rest will go to lens, which one do you recommend.
Thanks.
Sigma 17-50mm 2.8
Issue is that a 1.4 is way to wide and lets in way to much light. Also suffer from imperfections. Need a ND filter or something to go with it
No Sigma 18-50mm f2.8?
I havent used the Sigma 18-50, but I went with the Tamron 17-70. Slightly wider was negligible, but the 20mm on the longer side is what sold me on this lens. I find myself filming either at the widest end, or 50-70mm so I went with the Tamron. I'll have to check out the sigma 18-50 sometime though
@@keith-knittelIn comparison of performance and image quality over 18-50 mm range the sigma edges out the tammy but for some 1mm wide and 20mm more reach might be significant. The other striking thing about the Sigma is how well it combines with the any sonya6.... cam. A formidable lightweight combo for carry everywhere!
I want the 56 mm and 11mm!
Solid choice!!
@@keith-knittel I have the 16mm and 30mm right now!
I have the 11, 16, 30 and 56mm and now I want the 35mm 😂
Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 is THE best budget sony apsc lenses
the sigma primes have horrible focus breathing so unusable for video in my opinion. any idea of alternatives that are reasonable(not GM)? I know the Sony 35 1.8 is good. and viltrox is ok. what els?
Are they not compensated by the a6700? Or is that only for Sony lenses??
Unusable, really? How often are you doing focus racks from minimum focus to maximum focus?
@@kiwimike2330 I was hoping to pair the 56 1.4 with the FX30 as a third cam in my studio to provide a close shot of a video podcaster using AF. So no manual focus racks. Do you think the ‘horrible focus breathing’ makes it ‘unusable for video’ in this case because this is the only con I can see for a perfect set up?
@@smallbizdigitalmedia The 56mm is my go to lens on the main camera for talking heads. Providing there’s the space, otherwise the 30mm is great too for tighter locations.
@@jeremyg9305Sigma is not compensated. Only Sony is compensated (not even sure if all Sony). Indeed I find the focus breathing of my Sigma 30 1.4 pretty visible on video shots. Probably the lens not designed for video just for photo.
What about sony 16-55 f 2.8G?
That frame jumping also happens on my 17-70 in auto focus with the a6700. I am about to return it as this makes it unusable for video to me.
Hey dusty, i am wondering to know more about your issue here. Because i own a6700 and i want to buy tamron 17-70 too but im afraid it will make jumping frames😢
@@igLEONit’s mostly a general issue, heard it’s because the stabilization on the viltrox lens isn’t compatible with the IBIS in these Sony cameras
Informative & interesting. My preference would be the Sigma 56mm and Sony 11mm. That would provide some decent coverage choices. Looking forward to more of your videos 😀.
Good choices! Thanks for the kind words - any videos you're looking for in particular?
@keith-knittel Mirrorless Camera Comparisons. Saving up for a new camera body and trying to see what choices best fit my budget range.
No sigma 18-50??? You missed something
Zoom lens?
What zoom range are you looking for?
@@keith-knittel Is all the zoom lenses match the fx30?
Sigma 16mm is around $600? Quite a bit less than that might be worth correcting. Otherwise great video!
Video on best budget lenses, but no mention of price?
It's the F4 to bad for low light in the a6700 body? I mean not PIT BLACK LOW LIGHT just low
Havent used the a6700, but when I had my a6500 I found myself using a lot of primes so I could use them wide open when the lighting was poor. Would recommend checking out some primes if you're shooting in low light
@@keith-knittel well my two options are the 18-105 or the 16-55 it's the 105 is not enough.. cause I want something with zoom for more versatility
I have the Tamron 17-70MM and im looking for an alternative. At 70MM F2.8, the contrast is total garbage. Im constantly having to step down to F4 ot 5.6 to get the image sharp again. I thought it was my camera, but I tried other copies and it has the same problem. Contrast around bright objects.
Yeah, ''budget''
There are cheaper lenses, but I feel like these ones are the best image quality to price - if you have any suggestions let me know. I love testing out new lenses
Marketplace got deals
Shoutout to the other guava La Croix lovers 🤘🏻
Guava/passion fruit is solid, but key lime is the best!!
The more I used the Tamron 17-70 the more I grew to hate it. It's not a bad lens but it does the FX30 no favors. Also bang for buck primes... Viltrox kicks ass all day.
What you dislike about it? I'm on the fence between this one and Sony 18-105.
@@wouldoox8024 The VC is problematic for shooting video and you can't turn it off. It literally flips out if you zoom anything but slowly... and to be honest 2.8 it's just not fast enough on a APSC to get the best look from the camera. Better to get a used Sigma 18-35 f1.8 with adapter.
thx for the clarification mate :)
@@cameragod1
@@cameragod1Hey there, i am wondering to know more
about your issue here. Because i own a6700
and i want to buy tamron 17-70 too but im
afraid it will make jumping frames
@@igLEON it was a few things. I just don't think it's a good lens for video. I've now got a used Sony 18-105. it's f4 but the power-zoom and parfocal ability make it better to use and if I want a more cinematic look I go with the Sigma 18-35 f1.8 or primes.
Are you saying 1000$ is a good budget???
Sorry but yes. With great consideration, photography is one of the most expensive hobbies. From cameras ranging from 2k-3k dollars in some places, with most lenses costing around 1-2k. 700-1k is considered cheap to those lenses which are 2k from tamron, sony, and sigma.
Now this isnt to demotivate you from your hobby, but is an advisory or reminder. Keep up the photos with that you got!!
All to big without Sony 1mm. i have Chosen, Sony 10-20, Sony 15mm, sigma 18-50 and Sony 70-300
Actually these two are really not a “budget” things 😅✌🏼
Haha the term "budget" is extremely subjective! These were around the less-expensive-but-still-good lenses, but that title was too long
More budget options:
Viltrox 13 1.4, Yongnuo 16 1.8, Yongnuo 50 1.8, Viltrox 75 1.2
Sigma 18-50 2.8, Sigma 18-35 1.8, Sigma 50-100 1.8
Where are the “budget lenses”. This ain’t it dawg.
BUDGET APSC lenses? Are APSC lenses not already the budget version in the camera world?
what about sigma 18-50 2.8?