UK Government Blunder in SuperYacht Imprisonment in London? | Phi

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 жов 2024
  • #superyacht #superyachts #yachts #boats #Russia #Sanctions
    Every arrested/seized Russian owned SuperYacht I have featured on this channel have had one thing in common, the owner has been under sanctions from either the UK, US, EU or other countries. However this 58 metre yacht is different, the owner has never been placed on any sanctions list, and yet his yacht has ben imprisoned in the capital of the UK for over two months. We look at why this has happened.
    Subscribe now!
    / esysmansuperyachts
    Follow me on:
    Instagram - / esysman_superyachts
    Twitter - / esysman
    Facebook - eSysman
    PRESS NOTICE
    All Images are copyright of eSysman Superyachts UA-cam channel. No images may be reproduced or reused without express permission. If you are using any information from this video, please credit the channel eSysman SuperYachts. If you want to use any stills taken from the video contact us in advance. Credit of the youtube channel must be given also. If you want stills or video for use or syndication please contact us.
    Music by - Epidemic Sounds
    www.epidemicso...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,1 тис.

  • @chrischart2386
    @chrischart2386 2 роки тому +194

    Hi, I am a long time subscriber. I just want to compliment you on just how damn good your camera work and editing has become. Don't get me wrong you have always put out great videos. The opening establishing shot in this video is fantastic. Keep it up, you're doing a great job.

    • @simonelliott5956
      @simonelliott5956 2 роки тому +9

      Well said, I’ve noticed the same myself over time.

    • @CharlesDBarr
      @CharlesDBarr 2 роки тому +8

      I totally agree - first-class 💎💎💎💎💎

    • @lovelightcontinuum
      @lovelightcontinuum 2 роки тому +4

      I'm a relatively recent subscriber, but wholeheartedly agree that the opening sequences here are above the beyond. And the light! I am sure that he checked out the light at different times and intentionally chose this time. The other thing I really liked was the foreshortened or close shot of the bow of Phi while he's saying how it is a relatively "small" super yacht. Extremely well done.

    • @CyprusBeachHouse
      @CyprusBeachHouse 2 роки тому +4

      That new drone takes some seriously beautiful video.

    • @gavsintasmaina
      @gavsintasmaina 2 роки тому +2

      I am here from the start, and you are spot on Chris Chart totally agree with you.

  • @noelht1
    @noelht1 2 роки тому +66

    Beautifully filmed. You must’ve got there at half past sparrow fart a.m. to get it that quiet and peaceful. Good work.And damn son! That is a beautiful boat!

    • @RiverWoods111
      @RiverWoods111 2 роки тому +9

      That is a beautiful boat!!! My thoughts exactly!

    • @Glynn12
      @Glynn12 2 роки тому

      I was thinking the same thing then I found their official reveal video * (M.Y. PHI Reveal Video - Struik & Hamerslag - Royal Huisman Project 403)* and *Wow!* what a beauty ua-cam.com/video/15LAJCt9m38/v-deo.html

    • @theresedoherty8603
      @theresedoherty8603 2 роки тому +6

      I totally agree with your statement. And YES, that boat is a beautiful boat!!!

    • @jorgegonzalez-larramendi5491
      @jorgegonzalez-larramendi5491 2 роки тому

      she is a heart-break. rasPutin is famous for "revenge" against those who refused to lie and steal: the small cellphone company . . .

    • @safrane95
      @safrane95 2 роки тому

      Beauty is by design, murder is by design too. Tasteless oligarchs aren't beautiful, but their money buys designer yachts AND missiles, NCA NationalCrimeAgency are listening & following where the money leads.....murdered Ukranian civilians & cities turned to rubble.

  • @geraint8989
    @geraint8989 2 роки тому +45

    Putting aside the geopolitics for a moment (without minimising the tragedy one bit), that has to be one of the most stunningly beautiful vessels I have ever seen!

    • @orionspero560
      @orionspero560 2 роки тому

      We must have very different tastes. I find it BFU.

    • @Tina-mt9cl
      @Tina-mt9cl 2 роки тому +3

      I 100% agree and was about to comment the same thing...

    • @romeo9017
      @romeo9017 2 роки тому +2

      Saw her close to in Venice….

    • @Commander_Bunny
      @Commander_Bunny Рік тому +1

      I love the color.....Toyota has been using something very similar on its Tacoma and tundra models, a cross between grey and sort of a lapis blue...and to give it a matte finish rather than the gloss would be even better! If my old Opel was not worth more with the original paint job in her, I would absolutely paint it this color.

  • @CAUSELESSREBEL
    @CAUSELESSREBEL 2 роки тому +15

    Your new opening is gorgeous. and the music perfect.

  • @williamdrijver4141
    @williamdrijver4141 2 роки тому +18

    The movie "Casino" explained it very well: the bosses back home always get their cut. In Russia it's the boss back home. Don't agree? Three choices: bullet, poison, or the axe. Same for your wife and underaged daughter. As some gazprom executives found out because they "knew too much".

    • @DonnaGainesvillesGatorGirl
      @DonnaGainesvillesGatorGirl 2 роки тому

      I agree! Every Russian should be sanctioned and refused air travel etc!

    • @aquacruisedb
      @aquacruisedb 2 роки тому +1

      I don't disagree with what you've said (and good analogy by the way). However I doubt the British government are that clever or have the common sense to see it that way...for them I think it was purely a photo op, having such a good looking expensive Russian yacht to hand!

    • @AnEnemy100
      @AnEnemy100 2 роки тому

      No, there are Russians trying to escape Putin, they need to be helped just like Ukrainians need to be helped. Blanket sanctions potentially pushes them back into Putin’s grasp.

  • @rezdm
    @rezdm 2 роки тому +22

    Ok, Russian here, albeit living outside of Russia for longer than a decade.
    In Russia, once a business owner is at some level of said business volume, one cannot "skip" bribery and corruption on political level. Let me explain. If you are an owner of a few kiosks -- selling water, cigarettes, magazines, etc -- you'd probably come across fire dept checks, local policeman checks, and alike. All these checks can be "navigated around" by peanuts. Literally, a policeman that received, say, a notice about incorrect rubbish disposal from such a kiosk may close eyes after receiving chocolates for kids and bottle of cheap booze for himself. Obviously, more business volume, higher the demand. An owner of couple of shops would be "liable" to "help" local municipality head (you can guess what "help" means). As you can imagine, it goes all the way up. One of the steps is when governing authority start to benefit not occasionally by asking business to "repair that kindergarten", but to literally "cover up" certain grey schemas of business, providing law-enforcement protection. (See Magnitsky story). Not to mention that sometimes, when law enforcement sees a nicely run business it tries to take it under control and suck out all profits (google for DoDo Pizza case) by fabricating dubious allegations, ruining owners and forcing them to sell business for fluff cash.
    Hence is my opinion -- Abramovich & Co are definitely not the role models.
    The owner of Phi -- that should be relatively easy to check his business history.
    How did London bankers accepted corrupt money, doing all PEP checks -- yet a third point.
    It might be the case as well, that during the war times with clear offender, "ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat" might be if not reversed, but at least "ownership made more difficult while clearing up". Please, keep in mind, that for majority of Russians, those who live outside of bigger cities, just what they see in news is "yeah, cool, another yacht of a reach oligarch is arrested". These news make life of millionaires difficult, but not suffering. And yet another question remains -- how such an oligarch passed all possible PEP checks and was able to land corrupt money in "collective west".

    • @Dennis-vh8tz
      @Dennis-vh8tz 2 роки тому

      Russia is nowhere near unique in this. It's basically impossible to do business in much of the world without corruption. So anti-corruption laws either have huge gaps (like facilitation fees), or the authorities looks the other way until the want to harass/shakedown a business, or all the multinationals based in the country move their HQ and jobs and tax revenue that come with it.

    • @jorgegonzalez-larramendi5491
      @jorgegonzalez-larramendi5491 2 роки тому

      there is a little difference
      my family owned a tiny farm in central Free pre-soviet cuba. the local national guard would pop-in occassionally, say Hello could you donate a couple of bags of oranges for the orphan children ?
      my grandfather had planted those maybe 20 orange trees.
      some in family Outraged - fought the heartless tyrant Batista...
      eisenhower(R) installed fidel, sovi-cuba was zombyized: farm confistated. all stolen.

    • @rezdm
      @rezdm 2 роки тому +1

      @@Dennis-vh8tz I would disagree.
      "Low-level" corruption does not massively exist in "collective West" (example of a kiosk owner). Yes, I heard about some cases, literally, but it is incomparable to overall acceptance by just ordinary public.
      Mid-level (say, a chain of shops, or some minor industry) to upper-level (industry, but not as large as VW or Siemens in Germany) -- practically non-existent. A mayor of a city would not dare asking for a bribe so that such a company can continue working.
      Anyway, even when corruption exists in examples above -- these cases almost never lead to ruining lives, imprisoning either side, etc en masse, like it happens in Russia. See (lucky) example of Dodo Pizza.
      There are for sure, examples of companies like Siemens or Enron, and this is even more difficult.

    • @MDCDiGiPiCs
      @MDCDiGiPiCs 2 роки тому

      @@Dennis-vh8tz As much as theres corruption in all countries, name others that kill political opponents & journalists while they're in foreign countries, by using radiological & chemical weapons, like Novichok & Polodium. The west has its problems with corruption, but its not systemic & its not legal, in Russia, it is.

    • @Dennis-vh8tz
      @Dennis-vh8tz 2 роки тому

      @@rezdm I was explaining why UK, US, etc look the other way when their banks and other businesses deal with obviously corrupt oligarchs. I agree on the low level corruption.

  • @popeclementxi7303
    @popeclementxi7303 2 роки тому +27

    took a rather large detour from my normal london trip to see Phi, certainly dont regret it, shes an absolutely stunning ship

    • @JelMain
      @JelMain 2 роки тому

      There was another moored just behind it, Phoenix, about a month back. I wonder whose that was.
      One detail is that Rolls Royce can no longer sell engines or spares to the shipyard, because it's owned by a Russian. Much like their air fleet, those gin palaces will soon be aground on a reef of vodka bottles. Or at the bottom once the Ukrainians copy Drake, singeing the King of Spain's beard by sending fireships into Cadiz harbour. Either way, going nowhere.

    • @StefsEngineering
      @StefsEngineering 2 роки тому +1

      Yeah it really is, outside and inside are just great (tastefull interior and obviously excellent fit and finish)

    • @bigspin69
      @bigspin69 2 роки тому +2

      one of the most beautiful yachts I have seen so far

  • @alhubb66
    @alhubb66 2 роки тому +89

    Makes my day, when I get a “eSysman” notification!!!

  • @Chereese0808
    @Chereese0808 2 роки тому +64

    I don't feel the arrest is justified, nor do I believe the bridge was broken.
    However there may be more to the story than we know.
    This could end up in a costly lawsuit if nothing wrong has been done by the owner.

    • @texasslingleadsomtingwong8751
      @texasslingleadsomtingwong8751 2 роки тому

      Neither party cares about legal cost . It's all standard games

    • @orionspero560
      @orionspero560 2 роки тому +3

      You have a flag of convenience that doesn't match a corporate veil. That by itself is reasonable suspicion that suspicion that doesn't reach probable cause. You also have a group of people that the owner is associated with who are playing games to conceal ownership and avoid International consequences. That also would be grounds for reasonable suspicion but not probable cause if taken by itself. The combination of the 2 gets you well into probable cause to probable cause and probably to a per preponderance of the evidence. If the alleged owner is telling the truth he should get it back after a court case and that investigation investigation should work against the probable cause/reasonable suspicion in the future.

    • @crustyclown8845
      @crustyclown8845 2 роки тому +4

      Exactly what I was thinking. I believe there are reasons unbeknown to us. I doubt he got up one morning and just decided to arrest it. At the very least it’s a large “they”

    • @JelMain
      @JelMain 2 роки тому +1

      You can't sue the State, anywhere. Whether the bridge was broken or not, it was illegal to help them in any shape or form, read the main header posting I made on the subject. I'm one of the panel supporting that website, in passing: it lists the entirety of active legislation in the UK.

    • @JelMain
      @JelMain 2 роки тому +2

      @Grim FPV What do you mean, recently? This is what plenipotentiary power means. One State's piracy is the other's justice. We made a real point of it in the strop with Spain in the 16th Century - Drake sailed under a Privateer licence.

  • @krazYFaic
    @krazYFaic 2 роки тому +5

    For a moment there I thought I was watching an advert for Phi. Why yes I would like to buy this yacht.

    • @TonyRule
      @TonyRule 2 роки тому

      I'll go halves with you, mate. Take a cheque?

  • @frankv4271
    @frankv4271 2 роки тому +15

    You keep getting better and better, love your video. Very informative as usual, you can tell you know your subject matter.
    Always enjoy seeing your videos. Keep up the great work.😀⚓

  • @patdavis6383
    @patdavis6383 2 роки тому +39

    I tend to agree with the PR stunt claim.
    Arresting and seizing vessels without proper legal claim just delegitimizes the rightful arrests and the process as a whole. It just gives the people who want to criticize those issuing the sanctions a peg to hang their hat on.
    If the government has enough evidence to suggest a person has done something wrong, add them to the sanctions list. If they don't, leave them alone. The rule of law still applies here.

    • @Dennis-vh8tz
      @Dennis-vh8tz 2 роки тому +2

      The rule of law _ought_ to apply, but it appears to be dead and gone in the UK.

    • @trevordickenson3196
      @trevordickenson3196 2 роки тому

      Because a person is named owner don't mean that person is the owner and it's hardly a publicity if no one has reported on it during past two month's.

    • @patdavis6383
      @patdavis6383 2 роки тому +3

      @@trevordickenson3196 1. it has been reported on and received coverage. 2. publicity stunts don't need to be successful to be publicity stunts, they just need to be done with the INTENTION of garnering publicity, air time and column inches

    • @cyberdonblue4413
      @cyberdonblue4413 2 роки тому +1

      This Tory government (and many other governments of either Cons or Lab in days gone by) have proved themselves to be dishonest and underhand (and even corrupt in some cases) on many issues and levels before now so the arrest of a vessel for simply being owned by a Russian gentleman does not surprise me in the slightest. Who knows their reasoning but I doubt it makes any sense to most reasonable people.

    • @safrane95
      @safrane95 2 роки тому +1

      This yacht has been sanctioned , not because of financial links to Bloodymire Adolf Putrid, but to potential money laundering, for which every high st bank or financial institution is accountable. Just watch the next time you're questioned about "the purpose" of a large deposit or withdrawal - without a legitimate source or dedtination you'll be "sanctioned" by the NCA too

  • @Tranitaur
    @Tranitaur 2 роки тому +8

    This M/Y is beautiful, wish we could see the inside of it. Thanks for the coverage my good sir!

  • @johnshepherd4842
    @johnshepherd4842 2 роки тому +25

    Hi, my comment is unrelated to this vessel, but would welcome your thoughts on a reasonably new Princess Y 85 catch fire in torquay marina a couple of days ago, I have owned yachts in the past and am aware of fire hazards on board, but it would appear to be unusual given the age and the build quality of princess yachts in general.

    • @JelMain
      @JelMain 2 роки тому +2

      It seems it had just been rewired with a flashing nameplate next to 2000 gallons of diesel. They think the nameplate shorted, set fire to the fuel, and up she went. The owner's a Boycie type.

  • @markuswunsch
    @markuswunsch 2 роки тому +7

    Fun Fact: The owner made the 499GT decision based on costs as building Phi and her support yacht Phi Phantom cost him less then a comparable larger yacht.
    Quoting from the Royal Huisman blog post "Are two boats better value than one?":
    “First of all, building the mothership below 500gt was very important because compliance levels and build costs are much lower when you don’t have to meet all the standards that come into play at 500gt. And this extends to annual operational costs, which are also much lower below 500gt.”
    As such, PHI has been built to be 499gt, which offers significantly more value than a 500gt-plus yacht. “The educated figure that I’ve heard is a 25 to 30 per cent increase in build costs for 500gt compliance compared to sub- 500gt compliance, and double the length is at least double the build cost in terms of labour and materials,” adds Booth.
    “When you consider it would be potentially a 25 per cent higher build cost to have all of that utility on PHI rather than on a support vessel, there’s no way that our support ship has cost us 25 per cent of the value of PHI, not even close. So we essentially have the utility of a 90m [295ft] yacht at a significantly lower build cost than building a 90m yacht.”

    • @chrisbynum4940
      @chrisbynum4940 2 роки тому

      I wonder what has happened to Phi Phantom?

    • @Skillzvideos
      @Skillzvideos 2 роки тому +1

      @@chrisbynum4940 phi phantom is chillin in imperia port, Italy

  • @kokomo9764
    @kokomo9764 2 роки тому +17

    Beautiful yacht.
    I do not believe any of the people you mentioned began opposed to the war. They only made public statements after they were sanctioned. Abramovich is a perfect example of someone who hopped on the anti-war train very late. I'm not buying that he, or any of them, care about Ukraine.
    If you are Russian your assets should seized.

    • @Tekenduis98
      @Tekenduis98 2 роки тому

      Considering the risk associated with coming out against the current Russian regime... I think there is 'some' merit to them speaking out.
      What I don't understand is how we hear many ogliarchs are againts Putin yet they cant collectively get together and just delete the issue... so to speak.

    • @kokomo9764
      @kokomo9764 2 роки тому

      @@krombopulosmichael6162 Hardly Zenophobic, I am an American living in Kyiv with my Russian wife and our son. The conflicts in Iraq and Afganistan had a valid purpose and were not simple land grabs.

  • @jah211084
    @jah211084 2 роки тому +20

    Beautifully filmed mate
    With the FoC, UNCLOS requires a “genuine link” between the owner and the registry. Having the ‘brass plaque’ as a genuine link seems disingenuous at best

    • @ckm-mkc
      @ckm-mkc 2 роки тому +1

      The "genuine link" can be as simple has having a business based in your FoC state. Trivial to setup and staffed by nominee directors.

    • @Dennis-vh8tz
      @Dennis-vh8tz 2 роки тому +3

      @@ckm-mkc Just add another shell company to the already long chain. How significant are the links between Maersk or any of the Greek shipping corporations and Liberia, Panama, etc.?

  • @sus8e462
    @sus8e462 2 роки тому +24

    Great info & videography! Not only enjoying learning about the yachts, but enjoy vicariously travelling to see many of them! And no, if the beneficial owner is not on the sanctions list, it should not remain arrested. They either need to release it or update the sanctions list via supporting evidence.

  • @telebubba5527
    @telebubba5527 2 роки тому +15

    I feel I'm not getting the whole story. If the owner is not on a sanctionslist, on what grounds is the boat being arrested? And if there are no other grounds, has the owner taken action to free the boat? If he hasn't taken any action, why not? Surely a boat cannot be arrested for no reason, only based on the nationality of the owner. So I'm thinking something else might be at hand, otherwise I see no reason to arrest it. At least not in a lawful society. Whether we like it or not, justice has to be blind without any exeptions. We have our own rules to stick to and should not be guided by the atrocities of the other.

    • @hercg1967
      @hercg1967 2 роки тому

      This is all about west being thieves nothing more, money laundering is an excuse if that was the case they be investigated at there home country.. not for a foreign nation that has zero info on nature of his business or his taxes.. most of these owners of these super yachts own corporations or shares in big corporations.. it’s a joke really, but they can’t arrest Biden’s for laundering money in Ukraine or pisslosi for insider trading.. all hypocrites and lying thieves

    • @seanrota3359
      @seanrota3359 2 роки тому

      I'm sure the SY owner has his legal team on it, you are right we in the west are governed by the rule of law and the law must prevail. Unless it can be proven the owner owes his wealth to the President of Russia and that such wealth could be stashed for the future of the Russian President then it will be hard to keep this yacht under seizure. The seizure of yachts makes good copy for the media and a feel good factor for politicians.

    • @rjmun580
      @rjmun580 2 роки тому +1

      @@Memovox We grow very few bananas and we're not a republic.

    • @thebrowns5337
      @thebrowns5337 2 роки тому

      Many tory donors are russian. Lets just imagine the tories need a story that distracts from their constant mess, law breaking, arguing, backhanders etc - they might say to one of their russian friends/donors 'look, we'll give you a free mooring in London for a bit as long as we can spin it that we're coming down hard on you lot'
      Probably even throw a contract for dodgy rubber gloves their way for good measure.

    • @jimjonsen1591
      @jimjonsen1591 2 роки тому

      the war has been going on for 8 years since 2014 how many who many of those "plenty of people close to Putin" has said they are against the war ?? NOT one of them went out publicly when they invention started in 2014 but now that they are getting their bank accounts frozen their travel restricted and toys taken away NOW THEY ARE "against the war" DONT BE NAIVE

  • @classicraceruk1337
    @classicraceruk1337 2 роки тому +11

    If it’s not justified the owner can argue their case in court, simple.

    • @classicraceruk1337
      @classicraceruk1337 2 роки тому +1

      @@Memovox That Yacht is in the U.K. so U.K. law applies. Talking about other countries is irrelevant nonsense.

    • @jiminauburn5073
      @jiminauburn5073 2 роки тому +3

      So you would be ok with the government seizing your home, and if it is not justified, you can argue it in court in 6 months to a few years from now?

    • @TonyRule
      @TonyRule 2 роки тому

      @@jiminauburn5073 And entirely at your own expense.

    • @JelMain
      @JelMain 2 роки тому

      No they can't. You cannot sue the Crown (a technical term meaning the Government). It is explicitly illegal.

    • @JelMain
      @JelMain 2 роки тому

      @@jiminauburn5073 The Government can and does, and is currently doing so on a huge scale constructing the HS2 railway. It is paying full market price, in accordance with human rights law, which does not extend to sanctions.

  • @ManMountainMetals
    @ManMountainMetals 2 роки тому +7

    Not gonna cry cause a Russian billionaire got his boat siezed illegally. 😥

    • @aquacruisedb
      @aquacruisedb 2 роки тому +1

      I share the sentiment on one hand...but on the other hand it's a little scary how freedom is dissipating and government control increasing year by year

    • @ManMountainMetals
      @ManMountainMetals 2 роки тому

      @@aquacruisedb Truth👍

    • @mtowland
      @mtowland 2 роки тому

      Why? Because the owner is Russian, or because he’s a billionaire? I think the key word in your comment is illegally.

  • @thomasw5430
    @thomasw5430 2 роки тому +4

    Thanks for the update. Everything you explained about registrations makes sense to me. As you said the majority of the yachts I have seen are registered in the Caymans. Just like here in the US, if you buy a boat and intend to keep it in US, odds are you are registering it in Florida, simply because the taxes are cheaper.

  • @skuffbuzzer
    @skuffbuzzer 2 роки тому +6

    Almost feel sorry for this beauty to be arrested.

  • @AlexRochette
    @AlexRochette 2 роки тому +2

    Amazing camera work. It’s so good that during the opening sequence I was not sure is this was actual footage or computer-generated.

  • @MarkH10
    @MarkH10 2 роки тому +56

    The mechanical Certification to bring the ridge back into operational permissions is a public record. The Inspector and the workers are certified and licensed. I would love to see what they logged as occurring.

    • @TrevorDennis100
      @TrevorDennis100 2 роки тому +21

      Whatever they were told to log I imagine.

    • @mrabrasive51
      @mrabrasive51 2 роки тому +14

      The clamwheel spring tensioner mechanism that operates the safety override switch had reached dangerous tolerance specifications!..

    • @MarkH10
      @MarkH10 2 роки тому +1

      @@mrabrasive51 ...and who was the State Licensed Inspector to write it up? the License number for the Witness to verify, and the License and rating for the Repair Tech? They can be found on whatever you read with that information.

    • @AFP557
      @AFP557 2 роки тому +1

      Yeah I have a big problem with this if indeed the bridge was for some reason said to be broken when it actually wasn't. I have no problem with Russian Superyachts being impounded, but the political interfering with public infrastructure is very dystopian (see the Hong Kong MTR conveniently being 'broken' on the day of the largest anti-CCP protest in Hong Kong's history). No thanks.

    • @stevesmith866
      @stevesmith866 2 роки тому +2

      Bridge Broke, Boat Ours

  • @sandrasmall8148
    @sandrasmall8148 2 роки тому +1

    Beautiful footage and music..
    Love this channel...
    Favourite of all UA-cam.
    Thank you so much

  • @carlosuribarri
    @carlosuribarri 2 роки тому +10

    I completely disagree with seizing any priveate property because of the mere nationality of the owners. Things NEED to be proved

    • @juliesloan4100
      @juliesloan4100 2 роки тому +2

      Better to seize the property now and return it later, if they turn out to be innocent, than let it go and lose the chance to seize it.

    • @juliesloan4100
      @juliesloan4100 2 роки тому

      @@Memovox that's a pretty silly comparison since nobody's being thrown in jail, just his toy temporarily taken away.
      "We'll unplug your xbox till you tell us why your school essay is the same as the one your brother wrote last year"

    • @michaelwesterland1853
      @michaelwesterland1853 2 роки тому

      Proved to whom, Mr. Carlos? Proved to whose satisfaction?
      Do you require that you yourself must be convinced there is "proof" or you will not be satisfied?
      And just imagine, here in wartime allied governments and law enforcement act in their own timely manner without laying out their case and their evidence first, for all of us to see.
      Shocking, really shocking.

    • @juliesloan4100
      @juliesloan4100 2 роки тому

      @@Memovox ok, come put me in jail. Here I am

    • @juliesloan4100
      @juliesloan4100 2 роки тому

      @@Memovox lol kid, go find someone interested, it's not me

  • @AmitGupta-zm1wg
    @AmitGupta-zm1wg 2 роки тому +2

    What a beautiful vessel! The colour is just outstanding. On a colour palette it is not the colour one would even consider but it's amazing, how stunning it turned out to be.

  • @brianwatson8312
    @brianwatson8312 2 роки тому +33

    What is so different about yachts being flagged out and just about every cruise liner in the world doing the same merchant ships have being doing this for many many years

    • @jaquigreenlees
      @jaquigreenlees 2 роки тому +3

      exactly, the flag of convenience is widely used in all aspects of shipping.

    • @Tekenduis98
      @Tekenduis98 2 роки тому +6

      @@jaquigreenlees "shipping" ....you spelled tax evasion wrong.

    • @philthy63612345
      @philthy63612345 2 роки тому +4

      @@Tekenduis98 tax avoidance rather then evasion as it is legal to do so...

    • @jaquigreenlees
      @jaquigreenlees 2 роки тому +1

      @@Tekenduis98 That is not always why a boat is using a flag of convenience, if the boat needs to transit Panama Canal, having a Panamanian flagged ship saves on canal fees.
      You want to cruise your pleasure boat around the world, yet the insurance you can get in your country won't cover you if you do so you get the boat registered in a country that it will insure you for global use.
      both are not tax evasion / reduction and both are flags of convenience.

    • @x--.
      @x--. 2 роки тому

      @@philthy63612345 Not sure how the softer word changes the reality that they are evading the tax that would happen if they registered in their home country. Tax evasion may be completely legal but I think the rest of us broke-ass fools would be quite happy to register our cars in other countries if it meant we could avoid the taxes.

  • @lisanadile4688
    @lisanadile4688 2 роки тому +30

    Always happy to get your notification! Sorry for being off-topic, but someday could you talk about the “super” private vessels that are submarines?

    • @Tekenduis98
      @Tekenduis98 2 роки тому +4

      I was amazed to find out Nord had not only a submarine on board but a military class/type hovercraft and an amphibious landing vessel! We are rarely privy to the details of these secretive Super Yachts... imagine what sits within the hulls of other large yachts.

    • @kokomo9764
      @kokomo9764 2 роки тому +1

      @@Tekenduis98 I do not believe that Nord has either of the last two you mentioned. It has a Submarine for recreational purposes there is no mystery about that. Many yachts have submarines.

    • @lisanadile4688
      @lisanadile4688 2 роки тому +1

      @@Tekenduis98 What else can you buy after the support vessels, jet skies, and two helicopters? 😊 I saw a video about an actual luxury submarine. I don’t know how real it was, hence my question. Maybe a Boston Duckboat?

    • @lisanadile4688
      @lisanadile4688 2 роки тому

      @@Tekenduis98 The “Luxury Submarines” video is by the channel “Beyond Facts” FYI. Edit: 2 parts.

    • @thomasbeirne8213
      @thomasbeirne8213 2 роки тому

      @@kokomo9764 NORD definitely has a small custom landing craft to land it's luxury Range Rovers, of which it apparently carries 3, not BMP's :).

  • @fredcarlson5775
    @fredcarlson5775 2 роки тому +37

    Dan it is a beautiful opening that is for a beautiful ship. Since he's not on the list it should be released many ships around the world are registered in countries of convenience to avoid taxes including large corporations he should not be punished for that, governments can't have it both ways for people they like or don't like.

    • @DashDriver-z1r
      @DashDriver-z1r 2 роки тому +8

      It’s to do with money laundering and an international investigation into the owner and their financial affairs

    • @trthib
      @trthib 2 роки тому

      He's punished for being (one of) putin's personnal wallet(s)

    • @randomchance7796
      @randomchance7796 2 роки тому +2

      @@DashDriver-z1r Yes. Superyachts can be used for money laundering just as real estate can. And yachts can be arrested for reasons other than sanctions lists.

    • @pamelahomeyer748
      @pamelahomeyer748 2 роки тому

      Flags of convenience have more to do with getting away with bad repairs and other issues. I'm not sure if you're a Russian bot or just Who You Are but you're not making a very valid point

    • @JelMain
      @JelMain 2 роки тому

      Moreover, it was in accordance with the Sanction Regulations against Russia.

  • @SailingLearningByDoing
    @SailingLearningByDoing 2 роки тому +8

    Its criminal to just arrest this boatl! How many Uk billionaires own boats that are registered elsewhere? How many UK citizens live in Monaco to avoid taxes.

    • @JelMain
      @JelMain 2 роки тому

      Nonsense. The UK's not invaded anyone illegally in recent times. Iraq 1, restoration of law after Saddam invaded Kuwait and (technically) Saudi. Iraq 2, Saddam renegued on his truce terms. Afghanistan, UN-sanctioned pursuant on a treaty made with Pakistan in 1997.

  • @Danielseven-ir2mq
    @Danielseven-ir2mq 2 роки тому +4

    Its been seized.
    Perhaps the owner will have his day in court.

  • @Airline_Pilot
    @Airline_Pilot 2 роки тому +2

    nice video again… love to see you traveling around the world, just to show us the yacht in place!
    Keep going with this content! - Love it!

  • @xsleep1
    @xsleep1 2 роки тому +28

    Are you sure that the registered owner is actually the owner? Seems like the British government might have information that it isn't. Maybe you should do a story on yachts not arrested but owned by Russians not on the list. How many are there? Where are they located?

    • @AFP557
      @AFP557 2 роки тому +14

      @@pistonburner6448 Bingo. If there's one thing that I hope comes out of all this as a secondary effect of the Russia-Ukraine war it would be making it much harder (ideally impossible) for the super rich to hide assets offshore. The whole system is incredibly dirty and it's a shame that it has taken a war for things to get even slightly clamped down upon.

    • @_HMCB_
      @_HMCB_ 2 роки тому +1

      @@AFP557 amen

    • @Chris_In_Texas
      @Chris_In_Texas 2 роки тому +6

      @@pistonburner6448 Two of the largest telecommunication companies in the world AT&T and Verizon their CEO's make $25M and $20M respectively and most of which is in equity and not cash. Phi cost about $45M and about $4-5M to run each year. I am not sure a small time telecom CEO in the Urals can afford that large of a yacht, both in initial purchase costs and ongoing yearly costs with his "salary" alone? It would appear that he is another on-paper owner only and most likely isn't the real benefactor as he couldn't afford it. 🤦‍♂️🤷‍♂️

    • @boerewors79
      @boerewors79 2 роки тому +3

      Agreed. We have to distinguish between the registered owner and the beneficial owner. The U.K. Government may have information about this difference that they do not wish to disclose. I believe the same applies to Fiji where the U.S. government did not want to disclose in open court what they knew as it could jeopardize their sources of intelligence.

    • @banana-ui2qd
      @banana-ui2qd 2 роки тому +2

      @@Chris_In_Texas do you seriously not know how the world works? the is a difference between an owner of a company and the ceo. the ceo of twitter is worth 35 mil but the founder is worth 5.5 billion. you people really need to get your head of these russians asses, dont be jealous becuase a russian can afford things

  • @robertscranton8293
    @robertscranton8293 2 роки тому +17

    What a beautiful yacht. Query this: Why do so many Russian "business" people have so much crazy cash to spend on Super Yachts...Interesting. As a side note...most people that work hard to earn money rarely squander their profits in such a manner.

    • @ckm-mkc
      @ckm-mkc 2 роки тому +14

      Corruption. If you don't actually work for your money, it doesn't have any meaningful value, so squandering on useless shiny bobbles makes no difference.

    • @suebryanwilliams8611
      @suebryanwilliams8611 2 роки тому +1

      How much time do these Russians get to actually spend on their yachts? Not a real comparison I know, but we hired a small sailing vessel with a skipper for one day in the Med. and the skipper said the owner used it herself for one week per year! Also known people who work as masters or chefs on the big vessels and live on them all year, while the owners visit for a month p.a. max..

    • @anthonymitchell8893
      @anthonymitchell8893 2 роки тому +5

      @@ckm-mkc plenty corrupt British businessmen I know I was an accountant and worked in the city for years

    • @safrane95
      @safrane95 2 роки тому +3

      @@anthonymitchell8893 So called "businessmen" couldn't be corrupt were it not for enabling corrupt accountants that enable & guide them, that's how the City functions, & how wars are financed.

    • @safrane95
      @safrane95 2 роки тому

      @@suebryanwilliams8611 these yachts are merely status symbols, not for practical usage - like expensive paintings or jewelry, to flaunt their wealth & proving the corrupt billionaires who fund wars have no class, ethics, humanitarianism & humility.

  • @RuneKC
    @RuneKC 2 роки тому +3

    Whats most funny too me is Cayman Islands is part of the British government, rigth?
    The Cayman Islands is a dependent territory of the United Kingdom. Although the local legislature and courts are independent from the United Kingdom, the British Government deals with all international relations on behalf of the Territory.

    • @philipmackin1025
      @philipmackin1025 2 роки тому

      No, No and sort of.
      They are like Canada before 1982 and the other Commonwealth countries. Just WiKi both and read the Government section. Better yet, just Wiki Commonwealth realm
      Edmonton Canada

  • @BrokefishN
    @BrokefishN 2 роки тому +12

    So I think the gov has over stepped on this one.
    Are they going to "Arrest" every vessel that not "registered" in country were the owners/companies are from?
    If so there goes World shipping.
    Most vessels are not "registered" in country's where owners are from my understanding is this is common practice from the biggest ships on down the smallest yachts.
    Please do video about this fact.

    • @halburtonwarrington-minge3434
      @halburtonwarrington-minge3434 2 роки тому

      Stop the 'avoid taxes' scams that are currently legal. They benefit only the boat owner. Flagged. Registered. insured. owned repaired.... same one country only.

  • @stevealves1843
    @stevealves1843 2 роки тому +26

    My thoughts are that although the UK has really gone forward with supplying arms to Ukraine and also applying sanctions. These are not as sexy as arresting or seizing superyachts. So this Russian owned boat fell foul of our politicians looking for a high profile and glamorous photo op. Most superyachts would not be in the UK, it’s all about PR and face with our stupid politicians.
    Let it leave, there are billions of pounds of dodgy Russian money and also properties that can be seized.

    • @jerrywatson1958
      @jerrywatson1958 2 роки тому +1

      That is part of it. Besides it's the Wharfs newest tourist attraction. If he pays the taxes, of which you know he's got the money. Then the boat can leave if he wants. Why feel sorry for the Rich, let alone the Super Rich! Any government let you evade taxes lately?

    • @Tekenduis98
      @Tekenduis98 2 роки тому +4

      Given that we rarely know the entire story behind such events, its likely that there is a substantial amount of evidence supporting the vessels arrest, just that we are not privy to it.

    • @AFP557
      @AFP557 2 роки тому +2

      You are exactly right mate. And the minister in question, Grant Shapps, is a very shady character; used to go by the names of 'Michael Green', 'Corinne Stockheath' and 'Sebastian Fox' inorder to flog Get Rich Quick Schemes. If that doesn't scream slimy politician then I don't know what does.

    • @foxxster3565
      @foxxster3565 2 роки тому

      Given most of Europe is still buying billions of dollars of Russian oil and gas each week……..

    • @gustavmeyrink_2.0
      @gustavmeyrink_2.0 2 роки тому +1

      The Tory party needs photo ops to distract from the fact that they have been financed by Russian money for decades.

  • @mallowe9162
    @mallowe9162 2 роки тому +1

    I was in Marmaris yesterday…MY Ragnor and MY Anna both looking comfortably settled in there…
    Keep up the Top Shelf Chanel 👌⛵️🇩🇰

  • @dixie1579
    @dixie1579 2 роки тому +4

    Perhaps there is more to the arrest then what your aware of? Could that be? Love your site. Good work, always interesting.

  • @r312du6
    @r312du6 2 роки тому +2

    Great vid as always. Would appreciate an update on Alfa Nero, it just popped back up again in the Caribbean, Antigua to be specific.
    Tracker still “broken”.
    It’s owner Is on the sanctions list.

  • @bobbyv9393
    @bobbyv9393 2 роки тому +3

    The fact that you said he was a friend of Putin is good enough for me. Off topic. My condo over looks the Detroit River (Canadian side) the other day I was surprised to see a true superyacht cruise up river (Destination Chicago) It was the MV "New Secret: 74 M, 1790 gross tons, launched in 2017 and registered in the Marshall Islands. We get huge freighters going through daily but seeing New Secret did my old heart good

    • @robertmccallum8626
      @robertmccallum8626 2 роки тому

      so on that basis all skin heads ect with Nazi cross should be arrested, or because you were american apparel you follow bowdin, crazy

    • @bobbyv9393
      @bobbyv9393 2 роки тому

      @@robertmccallum8626 Its WARE American apparel and I agree "crazy"

    • @JackBooth1206
      @JackBooth1206 Рік тому

      He isn’t a friend of putin. He’s never met him nor does he want too

  • @DawnalynForrest
    @DawnalynForrest 2 роки тому

    Your videos get logarithmically better. Bravo!

  • @sonnybradford8435
    @sonnybradford8435 2 роки тому +3

    Vital information, really well presented. :)

  • @tolikmiro6533
    @tolikmiro6533 2 роки тому +1

    Beautiful cinematography at the start great job!

  • @brianpercival1829
    @brianpercival1829 2 роки тому +8

    Might be a 'Name' owner only. Real money payer for the yacht could be somebody close to Putin and owes a favour. Lots of ways to hide the real owner through Pure Trusts and Shell corporations. keep it arrested till the true identity comes out. Is this costing the UK Government 500,000 L (pounds) a month like Amedea?

    • @lwalker8785
      @lwalker8785 2 роки тому

      Do you think Putin is the real owner? tbh it looks way too small for him.

    • @brianpercival1829
      @brianpercival1829 2 роки тому

      @@lwalker8785 Don't know, but I have seen investment oppurtunities for high yeild offshore investing and one was Name Guaranties. Paid to use your name in pure trusts as an owner. You are required to pay any debts and ongoing maintenance. The trust gets the money from the participating individual. Lots of lawyers fees involved for contracts but can make a ton of money.

  • @sniper441
    @sniper441 2 роки тому +1

    Your videos are getting better and better and better. Love watching your channel evolve.

  • @jasonjenson9108
    @jasonjenson9108 2 роки тому +11

    Stealing someones boat on the basis of their nationality is wrong imho. This whole sanctions thing is an utter mess and is already damaging ourselves.

    • @anthonymitchell8893
      @anthonymitchell8893 2 роки тому +2

      were definatley going to get some bad karma somewhere down the line

  • @alexflo5030
    @alexflo5030 2 роки тому +2

    They now arrest first, and ask questions later. 😁

  • @Dennis-vh8tz
    @Dennis-vh8tz 2 роки тому +8

    If it isn't straight up racism and abuse of power the UK would be arresting virtually every vessel docking in the UK. The ownership structure used as a justification in this case is pretty much the same for the vast majority of large yachts and merchant vessels.

    • @MDCDiGiPiCs
      @MDCDiGiPiCs 2 роки тому

      Racism? HAHA! you sound like a pink haired lefty.

    • @DashDriver-z1r
      @DashDriver-z1r 2 роки тому

      As understand it it’s a international investigation into money laundering, that’s why it’s being held and NCA are involved, it’s not being held over the flagging issue or because it’s Russia but the fact putin has connection doesn’t help

  • @mikemiller9867
    @mikemiller9867 2 роки тому

    The vessel moored behind Phi is something special!

  • @Spacey7
    @Spacey7 2 роки тому +7

    How can they get away with detaining PHI with no evidence against the owner! How the hell have they got away with this for two months!!! This is surely not a legal action & the owner should sue the government for this & claim all his expenses since being prevented from leaving! What is wrong with this country!! 🤬🤬

    • @ttbko
      @ttbko 2 роки тому +1

      Look at how the British government make the rules up as they go along!

    • @HochgeborenKlown
      @HochgeborenKlown 2 роки тому +2

      you make up that rant based on limited information from a single video?!?!

    • @Spacey7
      @Spacey7 2 роки тому +1

      @@HochgeborenKlown nope!! 🖕

  • @madusan1
    @madusan1 2 роки тому +2

    First I am Canadian and have no connection what so ever with the owner or vessel.
    I strongly do not agree with this seizure/arrest. There is no legal justification for it that has been made public. I am, for the seizure/ arrest of those owners' vessels that are under sanctions but not if they do not. I believe in what is lawful and not about those that overstep their bounds. If their their is grounds to sanction this vessels owner then make the case in a legal and lawful way.
    This overstepping procedure disgusts me.
    Love your channel and the reporting that you and your network provide. Be safe as always. Thank you sir!

    • @johndooher2661
      @johndooher2661 2 роки тому

      There is likely more to the story than meets the eye of the proletariat. As someone else pointed out, it would seem logical that a billionaire yacht owner would have a ready cadre of solicitors well informed by a ready cadre of barristers who have set the table for rigorous legal challenges... and yet nothing to report?
      London is chock full of legal hotshots who have been handling any and all legal needs for wealthy Russians for decades and it seems to me that any number of them would be happy to take up a case of demonstrably illegal seizure... big stage, big money, big profile... so far big zero. I doubt there is anything simple about this case and look forward to hearing more as this unfolds.

    • @madusan1
      @madusan1 2 роки тому

      @@johndooher2661 presumption of the law is not law or lawful. That is not the elected think they can get away with everything.
      If what they are doing is legitimate, then be transparent!

  • @davidhauge5706
    @davidhauge5706 2 роки тому +11

    Absolutely. Using international laws to avoid taxes should be made as unprofitable as possible. Don't know how but those companies, lawmakers, country's, and lawyers facilitating such activities should also be punished.

    • @I___
      @I___ 2 роки тому +1

      where is the tax evasion? a man has built a yacht with tax-deductible money, and is entitled to register his movable property throughout the earth in the jurisdiction where it is least expensive. This is not a house in Trafalgard Square.)

    • @trthib
      @trthib 2 роки тому

      @@I___ I pay taxes on my car/bike/whatever even if technically I could use it anywhere...
      Large superyachts are mostly used in the Med and in the Caribeans (including EU islands...billionaires don't anchor in Haiti, they do it in St Barth, France !).
      Still, as of today it is not illegal but dirty oligarchs money financing genocide in Ukraine will most likely lead to some changes...

    • @davidhauge5706
      @davidhauge5706 2 роки тому

      @@I___ not evasion, avoidance which rich people spend a lot of money to keep legal and unavailable to nonrich people.

    • @I___
      @I___ 2 роки тому

      @@trthib you pay taxes for vehicles because you use public roads and public space to move around on them, causing damage to nature and human health. This is an aggregate fee. There are no such laws that apply to the oceans!)
      ... the war in Ukraine is financed by the Russian state budget, which is financed by European industry through gas and oil. therefore, only the structure of the economy will change. And this particular vessel does not belong to the friends of the state budget, maybe even on the contrary --- its opponents, like most Russians.

    • @I___
      @I___ 2 роки тому

      @@davidhauge5706 the poor behave no better than the rich, and more often more selfishly when it comes to money! one should not idealize poverty and the inability to enrich one's life.)

  • @kevarosenberg9018
    @kevarosenberg9018 Рік тому

    Currently sat in a restaurant opposite this yacht. Its still spotless in amazing condition. Some lights on inside. Maybe 2 people on board. Vessel looked to have been washed down recently as no residual snow on the vessel. This has to be one of the best looking yachts I have seen. Took some photos for posterity

  • @Pro2eus
    @Pro2eus 2 роки тому +10

    No matter what you think about russia or the wars. There is a real issue over property rights here. I think government's are setting a very dangerous precedent by taking people's property for extremely flimsy reasons

    • @veramae4098
      @veramae4098 2 роки тому +1

      Hadn't thought about that before. Thanks.

    • @gailatkinson8466
      @gailatkinson8466 2 роки тому +1

      I would suggest you tell the Ukraine people about property rights I'm sure they'd agree with you.

    • @Japs_Eye_Of_The_Tiger
      @Japs_Eye_Of_The_Tiger 2 роки тому

      Grant Shapps is Jewish, as are 80% of Biden's cabinet. They see this as payback
      for Putin's decision to excoriate the Jewish banking elite out of Russia.
      Russia fought back against communism and won.
      The international Jewish mafia hate Russia for this reason.

    • @Pro2eus
      @Pro2eus 2 роки тому +1

      I'm sure they would. I was encouraged to see that one of the first actions of zelensky following the invasion was to drop all gun control and encourage ownership. That's a good way for them to protect their property, and does appear to have helped them.

    • @visionist7
      @visionist7 2 роки тому

      @@gailatkinson8466 since they're having their homes illegally seized too I should think they bloody well should agree. You enjoy mocking people who've lost their homes then?

  • @gwm_john
    @gwm_john 2 роки тому +2

    With so many people in the world still living in poverty and lacking even food to eat - everyone who can afford such ludicrous toys should NOT be able to sleep at night - arrest them all !!!

  • @frankyu4967
    @frankyu4967 2 роки тому +10

    Thanks for the tax avoidance explanation and it makes sense now. P.S. I’ve always enjoyed your videos. Have a great week to all.

    • @Skarry
      @Skarry 2 роки тому

      Yeah, the more money you have, the easier tax avoidance is.
      My state has property tax on cars so people register them at their vacation condos. That's not technically legal but similar.

    • @frankyu4967
      @frankyu4967 2 роки тому

      @@Skarry yup, I used to live in WA. state with high sales taxes of 8-10% and we shopped across border in OR with no taxes. I heard WA. State Patrol would camp out by freeway on ramp during rush out traffic to catch cars with OR plates but drivers with WA address. Guess regardless of income, no one love to pay taxes.

    • @gustavmeyrink_2.0
      @gustavmeyrink_2.0 2 роки тому

      That is one reason Switzerland gets away with a low income tax rate of 20%: NOTHING is tax deductible.
      They don't have property taxes either, if you own a property they assess for how much you could rent it out and add that amount to your income.
      Every year the UK loses £120 billion to tax evasion...sorry...avoidance.

  • @MartinMcMartin
    @MartinMcMartin 2 роки тому

    Cinematography at the beginning was spot on.

  • @ckm-mkc
    @ckm-mkc 2 роки тому +3

    There may be other reasons why it has been arrested that are not public, but taking advantage of the tax laws as they exist now is not illegal. It may be immoral but we all do it to a certain extent (duty free, maximizing business deductions, company cars, etc).

    • @janicepalesch9221
      @janicepalesch9221 2 роки тому

      No, we don't all do it.

    • @dasvader_1
      @dasvader_1 2 роки тому +1

      Nothing immoral about taking advantage of tax loopholes. If the EU wanted to tax yacht owners on the work and refits, they just need to change their laws so that any flagged vessel has to pay domestic taxes on the work…. But then, how long do you think the EU and UK will have businesses based there doing this kind of work? Another country will capture that business and away go the jobs and profits…. Tax evasion is a bad thing, tax avoidance is just fine and that’s why we have tax codes. Do you think they were written to be moral and fair to everyone? Nope, they favor special interests and that’s not a bad thing. How much yacht work is brought to EU and UK in the of jobs and business vs. the tax that’s not collected. As with most things, we are now starting to see gov wonks getting over zealous with their new found powers…. Time to trim them back a bit.

  • @phillippurdy5893
    @phillippurdy5893 2 роки тому

    One of your best videos! Great cinema! Great music! Fine explanations. GBY !

  • @grondhero
    @grondhero 2 роки тому +16

    People need to stop thinking politicians actually know everything to do their job. I agree with the captain that this is a publicity stunt by an idiot in charge. Beautiful yacht.

    • @aquacruisedb
      @aquacruisedb 2 роки тому +5

      Yeah I agree. Something like this yacht is common in Med, but rare in London so great photo op with yacht in the background "look at what we are doing to stop Putin". When in reality we are all doing close to f all to stop Putin.

  • @jjinwien9054
    @jjinwien9054 2 роки тому +1

    As usual, your videos are well presented and informative. Just a quick question: is it my imagination or are there more ads when there are more viewers? Is this an algorithm thing?

  • @Shaden0040
    @Shaden0040 2 роки тому +8

    It should be illegal internationally for any vehicle to be registered outside of the owner's country. Bo more tax evasions.

  • @AH-wr1ir
    @AH-wr1ir 2 роки тому

    Love that new intro. It's great to see your reporting evolving and in such a unique way. Great work.

  • @CharlesDBarr
    @CharlesDBarr 2 роки тому +3

    Great content…not sure how I feel about the yacht being arrested🤔

  • @andrasferencz7948
    @andrasferencz7948 2 роки тому

    I'm not a lawyer, but the words "habeas corpus" came to my mind.
    I'm quoting from ACLU:
    "What is habeas corpus in simple terms?
    The "Great Writ" of habeas corpus is a fundamental right in the Constitution that protects against unlawful and indefinite imprisonment. Translated from Latin it means "show me the body." Habeas corpus has historically been an important instrument to safeguard individual freedom against arbitrary executive power."

  • @lutomson3496
    @lutomson3496 2 роки тому +3

    if the registration and flag are not illegal which it doesnt sound like it is should be let go otherwise it looks like the government there is extorting the owner for money I dont know anyone what wants to pay more taxes and fees

  • @audiebrock6290
    @audiebrock6290 2 роки тому

    I doubt very much that the bridge was "broken". It is definitely the smallest super yachts I've seen since subscribed to your channel but I think it is one of the nicest looking ones. Keep up the good work!

  • @AH-wr1ir
    @AH-wr1ir 2 роки тому +3

    The (currently legitimate) tax dodge by having work done in london whilst being registered elsewhere is a shocking revelation. Whilst so many people pay taxes and struggle to make ends meet whilst the super rich avoid paying is just offensive. Please can you try and use your influence to raise more public awareness of this injustice? thank you.

  • @worldsedge4991
    @worldsedge4991 2 роки тому +1

    That’s a great looking yacht. Beautiful lines. Pretty color.

  • @denisemeredith2436
    @denisemeredith2436 2 роки тому +9

    Beautiful footage. There is no logical reason as to why this gorgeous yacht remains in Canary Wharf when her owner isnt sanctioned by anybody. I suspect our givernment are acting like pirates and wish to extort money in the form of taxes from the owner. It is highly suspicious that the locks and bridges were broken preventing the vessel from leaving and then after the seizure, they were fixed. Russophobia is wrong.
    To be honest with you I see no reason why a boat cannot be registered in a tax neutral country and fly under the ensign of a different country where the vessel spends most of its time. Its like a bank account - some people have bank accounts in tax neutral countries like Switzerland and they live elsewhere - it doesnt make them a criminal.
    I would be interested to know how many superyachts are owned by British residents are registered in the Cayman Islands and which ensign they sail under.

    • @Whatisthisstupidfinghandle
      @Whatisthisstupidfinghandle 2 роки тому

      Don’t care. All Russians need to feel pain.

    • @jerrywatson1958
      @jerrywatson1958 2 роки тому

      He claimed UK citizenship didn't he? Pay the taxes, then sit your ass down and shut up. You're lucky that you're not stuck in Moscow like the rest.

  • @anlacombe
    @anlacombe 2 роки тому +1

    the tax laws need to be ammended

  • @wesdenham282
    @wesdenham282 2 роки тому +4

    These are outrages of the Administrative state done without process of law. What happens when, in a few years, Russian oligarchs decide to “unarrest” their vessels on the high seas with the assistance of the Russian navy or special forces?

    • @anthonymitchell8893
      @anthonymitchell8893 2 роки тому +1

      good post I honestly believe this is going to rebound and bite us on the a--e in the next few years I believe they call it karma we shall sea (pun intended )

  • @ericdove1382
    @ericdove1382 2 роки тому

    I don’t care if the video is a silent film of an hour of water moving. Esysman will always get a like from me!!!!

  • @puirYorick
    @puirYorick 2 роки тому +3

    The good guys need to also play by the official rules. They can't be allowed to just use vague suspicions based on someone's nationality to arrest their property and impede their personal freedoms. It's equivalent to racial profiling but on persons who happen to be quite wealthy. Wrong is wrong.

    • @DonnaGainesvillesGatorGirl
      @DonnaGainesvillesGatorGirl 2 роки тому

      War is wrong Wrong is wrong

    • @puirYorick
      @puirYorick 2 роки тому

      @@DonnaGainesvillesGatorGirl ...so obeying our own laws remains important even during times of war. Otherwise we lose the moral high ground to complain that putin is in the wrong - for instance. Like he said, some Russians *are* against putin's war.

    • @puirYorick
      @puirYorick 2 роки тому

      @@Ron-zr6se So those were US & NATO armored divisions rolling over the Russian border into Ukraine and murdering the locals plus raping the women?
      I think there is a lot of orange sun bronzer mixed into your brand of kool-aid there, "Ron". Save the trolling for a softer target.

  • @robertlevine2152
    @robertlevine2152 2 роки тому +1

    Welcome to the world of ships, and yachts. Flags of convenience have existed for many, many decades. My professional career in shipping started in the early 1970s and flags of convenience were long established when I started.
    Flags of convenience offered not only tax shelters, but it was a game changer when it came to regulatory compliance. US flag vessels must comply with US Coast Guard regulations, which tend to be more restrictive than those of say Libera or Panama. I remember early in my career having a ship's officer's cabin carpeted with a commercial grade synthetic carpet. A USCG officer that was onboard for an unrelated inspection issue an 835, essentially a ticket, requiring the carpet be removed and replaced with a wool carpet. US flag, USCG rules. At the time the fire regulations required that carpet smolder and burn at a certain rate. At the time the only compliant fiber was wool.
    We had US flag ships that were retrofitted with Inert Gas Systems in Japan. Unbeknownst to our engineers JIS, IEEE, ABS and the USCG all had different requirements for cabling when it came to fire. A foreign flag tanker, built in Japan to JIS standards and classed by ABS could discharge cargo in the US. But, a US flag tanker, fitted with JIS cabling, approved by ABS, was non-compliant. The cabling had to be to IEEE standards and UL approved.
    Much has changed since those days to make rule compliance more uniform. But, there are still rule compliance issues where registry with a flag of convenience offers benefits.
    As for ownership, I spent my career working for major oil companies. I always found it curious who the actual owners of the ships we operated were. Some of the ships were owned by the parent company. Others were bareboat chartered from banks, churches and individuals. I gave up asking who the individuals were.
    An interesting point in all these sanctioned yachts, why isn't Russia screaming bloody murder? It seems these yacht owners have been skirting Russian taxes by registering their yachts with flags of convenience. They are are also hiding their wealth and avoiding taxes through the use of offshore companies. News reports are saying Russia is hurting financially from the war. Shouldn't the owners of these yachts be paying their fare share to mother Russia?
    Bob

  • @yvonnetomenga5726
    @yvonnetomenga5726 2 роки тому +5

    @eSysman SuperYachts • I wouldn't assume that the yacht has been arrested merely because it has a Russian owner. It's very possible that the international task force looking into the Russian oligarchs are uncovering other financial crimes. For example, Russian oligarchs are not the only people who launder money. I would wait to see the arrest warrant (or whatever it's called in the United Kingdom) to verify the reason for the arrest.
    By the way, beautiful intro which I really needed after watching Ukrainian war videos. 👍

  • @cosmicsurfer5911
    @cosmicsurfer5911 2 роки тому +1

    Phi is probably one of my favourite yachts. Beautiful. 💯👍

  • @foadrightnow5725
    @foadrightnow5725 2 роки тому +5

    I'm an American and think the seizing of ANY property from ANYONE who hasn't committed a crime is out-and-out fucking bull shit! If guilt by association with Putin is all it takes, how many degrees removed is considered safe?

  • @glkcox
    @glkcox 2 роки тому +1

    It's important for governments to follow their own rules. If the owner is not currently sanctioned let him have his boat.

    • @JelMain
      @JelMain 2 роки тому

      We did. We applied the law. See above.

  • @johnbregenhoj147
    @johnbregenhoj147 2 роки тому +5

    I believe, if a government can do what they want to a (Russian)civilian, they can do what they want to any civilian visiting their continent. Having said that, I don’t believe each and every citizen in Russia is responsible for a government’s leader’s action! As far as flag registration, we all minimise government taxes because they continually bleed us of our hard earned money.

    • @no_rubbernecking
      @no_rubbernecking 2 роки тому

      The Russians are doing a lot more to the Ukrainian civilians right now. Meaning, for me, that anything the UK can get away with under their domestic law WRT a Russian like the one featured in this video, is fair game under the present circumstances. It is the sad reality. Also is it possible this is really an intel operation in the sense of supported by highly sensitive gov't intel and managed by No. 10? Not an expert on their gov't so sorry if that's misinformed.

    • @x--.
      @x--. 2 роки тому +1

      Property is not the same as person so the severity of the implication isn't quite as bad as your comment implies.
      (That said, a friend said the British customs employees rifled through all her belongings and read through her diary, then made fun of her for it... so... they don't have the best reputation anyway)

    • @no_rubbernecking
      @no_rubbernecking 2 роки тому

      @@x--. I feel that. Thanks.

    • @x--.
      @x--. 2 роки тому

      @@Memovox Me thinks you don't know what that term means but maybe I'm bananas. Horrors exist everywhere, eh?

  • @J.Cameron.Stuart.Adams.
    @J.Cameron.Stuart.Adams. 2 роки тому +1

    You wanna know my thoughts..... she is the most gorgeous stylized motor yacht externally to hit the water in nearly a decade. The focus during the design brief looks to have been her external lines and overall balance. Like a Palmer Johnson she is void of the sun deck. It's no coincidence she has similar lines to PJ. I believe the intention of RH is to attract would be PJ buyers. Not many owners building a new yacht this size appreciate loosing volume and an entire deck to purely visual styling esthetics. The same is true sacrificing interior volume for more deck space to compensate for the loss of the sun deck. Under the fiberglass skin with its beautiful chrome detailing she is an ordinary yacht. Regardless she is absolutely gorgeous!
    Cheers!

  • @davidvincent1093
    @davidvincent1093 2 роки тому +5

    To me in this specific case it is a hard call if this ship should be arrested. I shall assume that there are some much deeper reasons why it has been arrested that have not been made public. But if the owner is as clean as you said and can not CLEARLY and CONVINCINGLY be proved to NOT have Putin ties, I would think it would be a nice gesture of England paid for his lost costs, refueled it on the governments credit card, then have to write a formal letter explaining why they did what they did then let him go. BUT if in fact there is even a shred of evidence that he is tied to Putin or his actions in Ukraine then in my view they have done the right thing. Problem is it has to be perfectly clear one way or the other

    • @OOpSjm
      @OOpSjm 2 роки тому +1

      No, there is no deeper reason. The Shapps himself went out there for a photos.

    • @DonnaGainesvillesGatorGirl
      @DonnaGainesvillesGatorGirl 2 роки тому

      He’s Russian, he has enough $$ to own a super yacht, end of discussion. Put him on the list and refuse to fuel it. The 32nd News journalist was killed today in Ukraine, All Russians should be on the sanctions list

    • @carlyoung6111
      @carlyoung6111 2 роки тому

      You do know that the Government does not have a credit card, or any money for that matter? All of the cash that ANY government ( excluding perhaps the UAE) spends is taxpayer money.

  • @Meagain921
    @Meagain921 2 роки тому

    Nice intro…..interesting story. Never miss any of your vids, many thanks.

  • @markbowen3638
    @markbowen3638 2 роки тому +7

    Great content as always, thought provoking! I wonder what percentage of the world's super yachts are owned by russians? It does seem to be slightly disproportionate to global wealth. They do seem to like their maritime activities...

    • @JackBooth1206
      @JackBooth1206 2 роки тому

      About 9-10% of yachts globally above 24 meters in length are owned by Russians.

    • @Dennis-vh8tz
      @Dennis-vh8tz 2 роки тому +3

      And other ostentatious displays of wealth too.

    • @Dennis-vh8tz
      @Dennis-vh8tz 2 роки тому +3

      @@Memovox Most luxury brands are based in the west but their clients are global. And a disproportionate number of those buyers are wealthy elites from Russia and other countries where the general populace are relatively poor.

    • @JelMain
      @JelMain 2 роки тому

      @@Dennis-vh8tz Their access to luxury brands is also sanctioned in the same Regulations.

    • @stefanschneider3681
      @stefanschneider3681 2 роки тому

      I read or heard somewhere (probably in one ob eSysman's vids 😉) it's about 12 %. But but they get all the attention at the moment, for obvious reasons!

  • @maciejs3329
    @maciejs3329 2 роки тому

    Great footage, nice shots. not many news this time, i think too less informations you had to make material very valuable but ..again I really appreciate whole footage.

  • @jamescameron2676
    @jamescameron2676 2 роки тому +6

    NOT JUSTIFIED AT ALL HE SHOULD TAKE COURT ACTION AGAINST UK GOVT

  • @LMays-cu2hp
    @LMays-cu2hp 2 роки тому

    Thank you for sharing your tour.

  • @jettaca88
    @jettaca88 2 роки тому +4

    It shouldn’t be allowed for yacht owners to register their crafts in another country for any reason.

  • @rnggall9640
    @rnggall9640 2 роки тому

    Thank youfora glimpse of the Warf. Will be a must see on my next trip

  • @BoomVang
    @BoomVang 2 роки тому +10

    I would guess there is a real, justified issue behind this transitory fog of technicalities. Time will tell.

    • @BoomVang
      @BoomVang 2 роки тому

      @@AndySpicer Gov't can be ham-handed both in doing right or wrong. In cases of catching white collar criminals it can be very precarious to initially pin them down, often on technicalities, while the real case needs a bit more time to become airtight.

  • @texasslingleadsomtingwong8751
    @texasslingleadsomtingwong8751 2 роки тому

    The finger to push the little button to open the bridge was having arthritis. 😆

  • @mby_dk
    @mby_dk 2 роки тому +4

    Tricky to decide; Russian commercial vessels are sanctioned by the West, regardless if they are controlled by the Kremlin or not.
    I would say that there is a VERY low chance that some Russian without connections could become rich enough to own a SuperYacht, so I would go with reverse burden of proof in this case: Prove you are innocent, or face the music.
    But, still tricky!

    • @mby_dk
      @mby_dk 2 роки тому

      @@Memovox Do you have any compelling evidence for your accusation?
      I would recommend that you reconsider such comments - they are not conducive to a respectful dialog.

  • @d.josephvirnig764
    @d.josephvirnig764 2 роки тому +1

    Boats in wartime! I am currently sitting on a 1926 wooden tug commandeered in WWII. It appears to me (little more than opinion) that when in business, in today's Russia, you don't succeed to the point of buying that yacht, without sleeping with the enemy.

    • @philipmackin1025
      @philipmackin1025 2 роки тому +1

      There are many Yacht's or large ships around the world not owned by russian's in bed with putin, BTY, I insult by calling him Poutine, earned their money by hard work alone.

  • @wbrett1070
    @wbrett1070 2 роки тому +4

    I have been a subscriber to your channel for some time and thoroughly enjoy your content. Please don't disrespect Ukraine by saying some random billionaire russian has been trying to broker peace deals. That kind of implies that a compromise is there to be had. Russia is the 100% aggressor here, there is no 'deal' to be made, they need to get the hell out and then stand trial for war crimes against civilians. You do nothing but empower the despot by trying to tone down his horrendous actions on an innocent nation. You would certainly feel differently if you were Ukrainian. Play your part, either call it what it is or dont mention it. But don't give it oxygen.

    • @robertmccallum8626
      @robertmccallum8626 2 роки тому

      "innocent nation" the war has been going on for years, do your home work.

  • @vickyoakes4584
    @vickyoakes4584 2 роки тому

    Thanks for the update!

  • @patrickgreen9747
    @patrickgreen9747 2 роки тому +3

    The reason for arresting that yacht is absolutely a crime in of itself. Just because someone is a citizen of a country committing atrocities is not his fault.

    • @otm646
      @otm646 2 роки тому +1

      You don't understand how the Russian oligarch system works. The ONLY way that you have access to funds like that is to be on board with the Putin regime. It's very similar to the classic Mafia structure where individuals are delegating control over certain areas directed from the top.
      There are plenty of articles and videos describing how the structure functions from years before the Ukraine invasion started in 2014.

    • @patrickgreen9747
      @patrickgreen9747 2 роки тому

      @@otm646 then he should be on the sanctions list..! If the governments are not going to sanction him….then leave him and his shit alone. Can’t (or rather should not be able) to have it both ways.

  • @seantwomey396
    @seantwomey396 2 роки тому +1

    The legal owner needs to launch court action to challenge the arrest. It is wholly legal for a company in one country to register a yacht in another country. This sounds like a petty politician abusing the public trust and acting unlawfully if the beneficial owner is not legally sanctioned.

    • @JelMain
      @JelMain 2 роки тому

      It's about one nation sanctioning another, legally.