I have been doing what Kyle is saying for years and it was going well until September updates and the following ones. Now my traffic is tanking and it seems that those guidelines are not enough or not accurate.
That competition story Kyle Roof tells everyone, does it show how good he was, or how bad the other competitors were? I'm not going to fill my articles with lorem ipsum. Roof says Google can't read, but he also says he's amazed at Google's semantic understanding, and semantic understanding means reading. SEO has not to be as complicated as some people want us to believe, but it's more than putting keywords in the title, the headings, the url and the paragraphs. You've got to work a little harder.
Yeah spinning up constant theme using different words. But basically: - URL - Title - H tags - Image names - Alt tags - Paragraphs - Tables - Bulletpoints - Schema markup - Hyperlinks - Breadcrumbs But in today's times it's more about user interaction and time spent on your website anyways
@@jeffsteyn7174 Learned what? Where to put keywords? Well, if you had to learn it so late, what were you doing before Kyle Roof enlighted you? Thanks for nothing. Pathetic.
This is so right, i saw a couple sites im trying to rank for with the same keywords. But they have ZERO texts in forms of H2 paragraphes etc. Just 1 single H1 and some products below. But they have a shit ton of backlinks, it’s unfair imo
I just love these SEO Grifting Gurus. Only in the world of niche sites and SEO, can someone claim to be an expert without providing a single URL or Domain as proof of their expertise......
Dude, either you were born yesterday, or your just jealous. Kyle Roof has proven his tactics and techniques over and over again. That's why so many people pay him monthly for his tool POP (Page Optimizer Pro) and many of them not only swear by him and his tool, but they too have the stats to prove it. But I bet you believe all these 'UA-camrs' with their fancy graphics and claims of $1000's a day with very little work. (Some are real and telling the truth, but MOST are just throwing up content to get that UA-cam ad revenue) and disappear in the comments section when you challenge them.
@@cmgweb6951 As I asked the last reply, name one site, one URL, either one of his or somebody else's site that's proof......Until then you and him and all the other so-called SEO experts are full of it.....
I have been doing what Kyle is saying for years and it was going well until September updates and the following ones. Now my traffic is tanking and it seems that those guidelines are not enough or not accurate.
Have you taken his courses ? Or are you just going by his youtube advice ?
That competition story Kyle Roof tells everyone, does it show how good he was, or how bad the other competitors were? I'm not going to fill my articles with lorem ipsum. Roof says Google can't read, but he also says he's amazed at Google's semantic understanding, and semantic understanding means reading. SEO has not to be as complicated as some people want us to believe, but it's more than putting keywords in the title, the headings, the url and the paragraphs. You've got to work a little harder.
Can we not do Loren Epsum every time? Maybe mix in the getting ran out of India story more often?
Lol ditto
Lorem Ipsum case was really incredible. Terrifying, but incredible.
Google's algorithm knows that lawyer and attorney are the same. That being said, keep it consistent with one or the other on the page.
Of course. Algorithmic analysis is based on math. Rank and sales will always be the important metric.
So: url, title tag, H1, H2, H3, paragraphs, ... Is that a revelation? Where else would you put keywords? On the desk, next to your keyboard?
i was about to comment this . rofl
Yeah spinning up constant theme using different words. But basically:
- URL
- Title
- H tags
- Image names
- Alt tags
- Paragraphs
- Tables
- Bulletpoints
- Schema markup
- Hyperlinks
- Breadcrumbs
But in today's times it's more about user interaction and time spent on your website anyways
You so clever. Except you didn't learn this on your own, you learnt it from people who were copying Kyles case studies. So say thank you and move on.
@@jeffsteyn7174 Learned what? Where to put keywords? Well, if you had to learn it so late, what were you doing before Kyle Roof enlighted you? Thanks for nothing. Pathetic.
This is so right, i saw a couple sites im trying to rank for with the same keywords.
But they have ZERO texts in forms of H2 paragraphes etc.
Just 1 single H1 and some products below.
But they have a shit ton of backlinks, it’s unfair imo
Backlinks is the king, not the content
Kyle is losing weight!! Wtg Kyle!! 🙌🏽🙌🏽🙌🏽
Kyle said Paragraph tags. What are those?
He said text FYI
I just love these SEO Grifting Gurus. Only in the world of niche sites and SEO, can someone claim to be an expert without providing a single URL or Domain as proof of their expertise......
Pretty sure Kyle Roof has a metric assload of case studies
Name one URL, and not a 10 year old one, but a recent one....Just one....@@SmartMarketingExamples
Dude, either you were born yesterday, or your just jealous. Kyle Roof has proven his tactics and techniques over and over again. That's why so many people pay him monthly for his tool POP (Page Optimizer Pro) and many of them not only swear by him and his tool, but they too have the stats to prove it.
But I bet you believe all these 'UA-camrs' with their fancy graphics and claims of $1000's a day with very little work. (Some are real and telling the truth, but MOST are just throwing up content to get that UA-cam ad revenue) and disappear in the comments section when you challenge them.
@@cmgweb6951 As I asked the last reply, name one site, one URL, either one of his or somebody else's site that's proof......Until then you and him and all the other so-called SEO experts are full of it.....
This dude in the interview has a plethora of case studies… you’re not the brightest are you 😂
Why these seo gurus don't build their media brands they will crush it 😊
Preach!
This is hilarious
I thought title and H1 was the same?
Those are two different things.
No.
Title for the whole article is just one and H1 is a subheading, can be one of many or can be just one.
Meta title and H1 are two different things.
Page title
This ridiculous concept may have worked once, it will not work today
Okay so some personal hygiene?
Early morning interview - he'd just pulled an all-nighter!