Shall we ignore some pillocks here who clearly are more interested in casting shade than learning...Meanwhile, I have often wondered how a watercolour could be saved and in this case, from such a gruesome fate! Thank goodness for the HVAC support and the patience! My quibble would be the actual accuracy of the dobbed cerulean blue in the upper left corner: a bit too much there and not enough light warm grey to tone it down? And I agree with some about the missing pinstripe on the new (very white!) wide mat. Some paintings deserve a more subtle surround. Overall VERY interesting insight. Sorry the digital enhanced idea did not impress me. It just looked, well, digitally enhanced and not like a watercolour at all.
I paint a lot with watercolours and mold is my mortal enemy, so this repair and restoration is amazing to see. I love the delicacy and care involved in the process.
I'm a little surprised that the glass wasn't replaced with UV blocking glass. The mount was modern materials and modern techniques - certainly, UV glass would further protect the the work.
UV blocking glass is only beneficial to works of immense importance. This is a decent enough piece but not that great. The great German lens makers such as Zeiss and Schott are the experts to refer any enquiry over filters. Most works of art can be protected from UV by simply placing on a wall that does not receive direct light.
Me too, I've done a fair amount of picture framing and frame repurposing in the past and now would always have new UV glass cut for 2 reasons, firstly as the original glass is always damaged, pitted and chipped, and secondly to cut out reflection. I find the UV glass needs a lot of washing and cleaning over and over to remove the oil spill type of effect on the surface.
I wish there was more detailed explanations on the products and techniques used. I see a lot of comments about julian and i think people specifically like him because he explains everything. It makes you feel like you are participating instead of just watching
Any framer that has worked with original art should know that watercolours tend to be mounted with a single, double, occasionally a triple mount and on rare occasions a floating mount. The cleaning process shown has not addressed the actual cleaning of the artwork nor the neutralisation of the mould. Quite why the glass was sealed to the frame is a mystery to me as, to put the A/W into the frame, the framer usually creates a "sandwich" comprising glass, mount, artwork and board; the glass is dropped onto the sandwich to dispel any dust particulates and MIGHT at this point be sealed - again highly unusual before the completed frame is placed over the sandwich, turned over and secured with 2 pins per side. Once checked that there is no dust between the glass and the mount, the remaining pins complete the process.. The a/w might have a secondary board to cover the back that is tacked down and then sealed with tape to prevent dust or fly intrusion.
@@irenedavo3768 yes. I prefer working in oil as I make my own paint, though do also work in watercolour. Watercolour is often considered less skilled than the oil equivalent. I disagree - oil is far more forgiving, provided that some rules are followed. Rules are simple and, for me as an amateur artist, need to be followed. Thick over thin and fat over lean. This means a sketch (thinned paint) which is made with a small amount of paint and a large amount of thinning agent (I use turpentine). The foundations can be built upon with successive layers that introduce more pigment (think of this as the thickness) which are bound and manipulated in the binder. So while I use either linseed or walnut oil as my binder, I tend to use linseed oil in successive layers either in a glaze (layered technique) or in the composition of work from sketch to painting. Oh.... and I also make my own varnish to seal my artwork. In short, I know what I am talking about in terms of the technical approach to art. I have competence for many years as a gilder where my original and restorative work can be seen in some of the finest galleries in London and my own work has only been exhibited privately. I am NOT a commercial artist and retired to concentrate in building my art collection 30 or so years ago. I hope that this fuller answer provides a little depth to my argument.
De cierto que el video fue hecho por alguien que capto el flujo de delicadeza q7e hay en cada trabajo hecho para salvar una obra de arte en manos de las manos artistas, que le devuelve magistralmente su belleza.....y yo que creí que el hongo era vegetación....ahora se ve...la calma
Wow! Always see on Antiques Roadshow the curators saying the painting needs to be cleaned or restored. Always wondered how this is done, Very impressive the techniques, skill and serious patience to restore one of kind artwork.
Very impressive work and some brilliant tips, I especially enjoyed the mounting and framing steps, I've done a fair amount of picture framing and vintage frame repurposing in the past and now would always have new UV glass cut for 2 reasons, firstly as the original glass is always damaged, pitted and chipped, and secondly to cut out reflection. I find the UV glass needs a lot of washing and cleaning over and over to remove the oil spill type of effect on the surface. I was also a bit surprised to see the frame touched in, in part, with gold acrylic paint which personally I don't like the look of, I think it looks a bit synthetic. So much trouble taken with the restoration I was a bit surprised at these two decisions, however still fantastic work.
I had the same question. The back of the painting was still very moldy looking. I'm guessing they addressed this, but didn't enlighten us. Leaving mold spores in the paper would not be acceptable.
Hi, I have been thinking about this issue too, though mostly while watching Baumgartner Restaurations. I have no idea if I'm right, but I've been thinking that there might be some things the untrained shouldn't know. One of the reasons could be, because of who knows what damage an enthusiastic home "restorer" might do to an innocent painting, if they get the key to the banana plantation. The other is, if you have found the best product to clean a painting, stabilize it, or any number of products and practices there are, that would be your knowhow. That would be the reason people come to you for restoration work, and not go to the cheep-o guy in the next town over. Why would you want to give your knowhow away for free, and to people who might not know what they are doing. Now their customers are blaming you because they got what they paid for with this untrained dufus. Being in a cynical mood tonight, and being somewhat familiar with the American ways (I'm from northern Europe) that would be a lawsuit in there by somebody. Now your insurance premium skyrocketing, plus your productivity would be going down because you're having to spend so much time with your legal team. As I said I don't know if I'm right, it might be that UA-cam has told you that your videor need to be no longer than 20-30 minutes. It's happening to a lot of people around the platform, I've heard. In such a short time nobody has the time to go in to the more special interests parts of whatever their content might be. I do believe that the speaker said after the vacuum machine with HEPA was done, that the restorer bound the spores with alcohol. Maybe that was the actual mold and fungi they stabilized. I think I'm done being cynical for tonight, so I bid you a good night. Yours, Ann
@@nacekozo I´m quite sure we have´nt even seen the top of the iceberg of work. From all we have, he has done loads of different work and Im sure he has done watercolours aswell :) Anyways, it was just a general statement of love for his work :)
I don’t understand, in the frame repair, making the small repairs before the entire frame is cleaned. Is there not a chance that dirt and grime are still present?
I agree, the frame cleaning looked sloppy, cleaning and repairing at the same time. Maybe because I watch another well-known restorer (JB) and am acustom to his meticulous cleaning procedures. Btw I know he (JB) doesn't do paper conservations or watercolor restorations.
У меня возник вопрос: почему для чистки рамы не используют мягкую зубную щётку? Мне кажется, было бы намного эффективнее, щеткой лучше удаляется грязь из углублений.
Interesting breakdown of this conservation project. No disrespect intended,but I kept silently asking what Julian would do at various points in this project. There are a number of great conservator training styles out there but I've been partial to Julian's methods ever since I found his channel. It's fascinating to see different techniques employed to clean and protect these works and how a conservator's training can alter the piece.
If it is cleaned and not damaged, there is no reason not to and it keeps the object as original as possible. Of course, re-placement with UV museum glass would protect the painting better from light and cut down on glare.
For my money, the best way to deal with seriously damaged watercolors on paper is not to buy them in the first place, because restoration is so challenging. Respect to this restorer for bringing this disaster back to very presentable form.
Watercolors are tricky to restore. While she did a fair job of repairing the frame and conserving the paper, there's no real way to restore the actual painting, discoloration, and mold spots without repainting. At the end of the day, this lady finger painted over 25% of an original watercolor with pastels. I think that's a bit heavy handed. I would have restored the paper, removed spots, and let a landscape watercolor artist retouch to the best of their ability.
I feel the same way. Other conservators would not add anything to the painting. Water colors especially can't be reversed with solvents like acrylic or oil paints can. She basically made a new painting
One choice would be to use gouache instead of watercolor to overpaint where needed. It's still water-based, but is more opaque and thus could hide the damaged spots while staying within the spirit of the medium. Many artists use both watercolor and gouache on the same painting to get the effects they desire.
Don't try this at home..... people do! But it takes years of experience, expert training, the proper equipment, endless patience. The other thing - don't let your paintings get into this condition in the first place - I imagine the saving of this one, as well as the huge skill of the conservator of course, was Pearson's use of the most lightfast pigments he could source, and the use of cotton rag paper - I don't know for sure, never having done this, but I would guess wood-pulp paper would have presented even more problems. A treasure saved!
Although - had the painting been of greater value or potential value, you wouldn't have seen a conservator finger painting with pastel ... Even so, despite the negative comments (bearing in mind too that we didn't see everything, including whatever preparation was used to prevent mould recurrence) the process was interesting and, with luck, will give the picture another 100 years of life - after which, if it needs further care and attention, at least the next conservator should have an easier job - maybe apart from that pastel....
Nice job, but as a paper conservator I was surprised that you did not locally reduce mold stains prior to retouching. Also current best practices recommends the use of archival acrylic for glazing rather than glass which can cut paper if the frame falls or is mishandled. Otherwise meticulous work.
Does anyone know the value of the painting? It was interesting enough for me to watch the whole thing but it would have been better to have heard why you were doing what you were doing.
It is a shame that, in the top left corner, the paper was so badly stained that pastel had to be used as a concealer. Still, I think it looks much better than leaving the stains showing and obviously you can't use transparent watercolour to do it. I think it's an excellent honest restoration, not an attempt to con anyone that is a perfect painting.
i am curious why the frame cant be cleaned with a large brush dipped in alchohol, give it a bath with a brush. Is that because of the gold in the frame?
I'm guessing the wood expands and contracts, cracks and warps with a lot of moisture, and also the plaster details. I think the alcohol was used mostly in order to neutralize the mold. But alcohol is a % water. If it didn't have mold, it would have probably only be dry brushed clean, with maybe a few spots cleaned with alcohol.
Julian Baumgartner would be having heart palpitations watching this! Whoever was doing this work appears to have the manual dexterity and conservation skills of a 5 year old
How is that? It was ready for the incinerator pre-restoration. Watercolor and works-on-paper are hard to restore and this brought it a lot of the way back.
Disappointed to see this restoration. You can totally see the pastels on top of the watercolor and it does not look good. This restoration was done for me. I’d be very upset.
Would have liked to see this done by someone who can properly narrate and operate a camera... We don't even get to see the final product in a live shot... And wtf was the purpose of the aluminum foil? Doesn't make any sense... Most of the operations never get explained, the audience cannot get engaged because of the horrible camera and narrations.. I'll be clicking do not recommend..
That was a treat to watch and no endless talking. Removing the backing looks tedious but it had to be done and you did it.
Didn't you hear that annoying AI voice?
I was so engrossed watching this restoration. A lot of work, but the end result was awesome. Beautiful picture. ❤❤
Shall we ignore some pillocks here who clearly are more interested in casting shade than learning...Meanwhile, I have often wondered how a watercolour could be saved and in this case, from such a gruesome fate! Thank goodness for the HVAC support and the patience! My quibble would be the actual accuracy of the dobbed cerulean blue in the upper left corner: a bit too much there and not enough light warm grey to tone it down? And I agree with some about the missing pinstripe on the new (very white!) wide mat. Some paintings deserve a more subtle surround. Overall VERY interesting insight. Sorry the digital enhanced idea did not impress me. It just looked, well, digitally enhanced and not like a watercolour at all.
Wow!
Are you an Artist?
Wonder who owns it?
WOW what a magnificent restoration. I’m really impressed that you restored the really old masterpiece 👏👏👏👌
It's amazing the paper didn't rot. Although it looks as if the backing did a bit.
So superbly done. The painting is beautiful.
Nicely done, no ego, just results! Very rare on YT!
I paint a lot with watercolours and mold is my mortal enemy, so this repair and restoration is amazing to see. I love the delicacy and care involved in the process.
This is absolutely fascinating.
I can't believe a Pearson ended up in that condition. Terrible. Thank god for an awesome restoration.
When I were younger, this was my dream career, I wish I had the courage to get involved someway, either art restoration or Book restoration.
I'm a little surprised that the glass wasn't replaced with UV blocking glass. The mount was modern materials and modern techniques - certainly, UV glass would further protect the the work.
UV blocking glass is only beneficial to works of immense importance. This is a decent enough piece but not that great. The great German lens makers such as Zeiss and Schott are the experts to refer any enquiry over filters.
Most works of art can be protected from UV by simply placing on a wall that does not receive direct light.
Me too, I've done a fair amount of picture framing and frame repurposing in the past and now would always have new UV glass cut for 2 reasons, firstly as the original glass is always damaged, pitted and chipped, and secondly to cut out reflection. I find the UV glass needs a lot of washing and cleaning over and over to remove the oil spill type of effect on the surface.
Bravo👏pour cette magnifique restauration. J’admire votre travail de précision 👍👍😉🇫🇷
I wish there was more detailed explanations on the products and techniques used. I see a lot of comments about julian and i think people specifically like him because he explains everything. It makes you feel like you are participating instead of just watching
If you watched Baumgartner 5 times you should know what he is doing.
Any framer that has worked with original art should know that watercolours tend to be mounted with a single, double, occasionally a triple mount and on rare occasions a floating mount. The cleaning process shown has not addressed the actual cleaning of the artwork nor the neutralisation of the mould. Quite why the glass was sealed to the frame is a mystery to me as, to put the A/W into the frame, the framer usually creates a "sandwich" comprising glass, mount, artwork and board; the glass is dropped onto the sandwich to dispel any dust particulates and MIGHT at this point be sealed - again highly unusual before the completed frame is placed over the sandwich, turned over and secured with 2 pins per side. Once checked that there is no dust between the glass and the mount, the remaining pins complete the process.. The a/w might have a secondary board to cover the back that is tacked down and then sealed with tape to prevent dust or fly intrusion.
Wow!
Do you paint?
@@irenedavo3768 yes. I prefer working in oil as I make my own paint, though do also work in watercolour. Watercolour is often considered less skilled than the oil equivalent. I disagree - oil is far more forgiving, provided that some rules are followed.
Rules are simple and, for me as an amateur artist, need to be followed. Thick over thin and fat over lean. This means a sketch (thinned paint) which is made with a small amount of paint and a large amount of thinning agent (I use turpentine). The foundations can be built upon with successive layers that introduce more pigment (think of this as the thickness) which are bound and manipulated in the binder.
So while I use either linseed or walnut oil as my binder, I tend to use linseed oil in successive layers either in a glaze (layered technique) or in the composition of work from sketch to painting.
Oh.... and I also make my own varnish to seal my artwork.
In short, I know what I am talking about in terms of the technical approach to art. I have competence for many years as a gilder where my original and restorative work can be seen in some of the finest galleries in London and my own work has only been exhibited privately. I am NOT a commercial artist and retired to concentrate in building my art collection 30 or so years ago.
I hope that this fuller answer provides a little depth to my argument.
The result was very please - a great restoration job.
De cierto que el video fue hecho por alguien que capto el flujo de delicadeza q7e hay en cada trabajo hecho para salvar una obra de arte en manos de las manos artistas, que le devuelve magistralmente su belleza.....y yo que creí que el hongo era vegetación....ahora se ve...la calma
Wow! Always see on Antiques Roadshow the curators saying the painting needs to be cleaned or restored. Always wondered how this is done, Very impressive the techniques, skill and serious patience to restore one of kind artwork.
I am amazed at her patience.No wonder this is expensive.
Incredible !
Maravilla de trabajo.Gracias ñor compartir.Saludos.
Just realised l have been putting paper tape on wrong for years , thank you for a brilliant video.
Very impressive work and some brilliant tips, I especially enjoyed the mounting and framing steps, I've done a fair amount of picture framing and vintage frame repurposing in the past and now would always have new UV glass cut for 2 reasons, firstly as the original glass is always damaged, pitted and chipped, and secondly to cut out reflection. I find the UV glass needs a lot of washing and cleaning over and over to remove the oil spill type of effect on the surface. I was also a bit surprised to see the frame touched in, in part, with gold acrylic paint which personally I don't like the look of, I think it looks a bit synthetic. So much trouble taken with the restoration I was a bit surprised at these two decisions, however still fantastic work.
It needs the pinstripes on the matt, it is floating about in space in a frame that is too big.
How is the mold killed on the paper to stop it dead? Lots of stuff is left out.
They burned the painting afterwards to kill the mould.
I had the same question. The back of the painting was still very moldy looking. I'm guessing they addressed this, but didn't enlighten us. Leaving mold spores in the paper would not be acceptable.
the grime looked different in every befor-after.. it's a shame even this kind of content gets faked. It's just photoshopped.
Hi, I have been thinking about this issue too, though mostly while watching Baumgartner Restaurations. I have no idea if I'm right, but I've been thinking that there might be some things the untrained shouldn't know. One of the reasons could be, because of who knows what damage an enthusiastic home "restorer" might do to an innocent painting, if they get the key to the banana plantation.
The other is, if you have found the best product to clean a painting, stabilize it, or any number of products and practices there are, that would be your knowhow. That would be the reason people come to you for restoration work, and not go to the cheep-o guy in the next town over. Why would you want to give your knowhow away for free, and to people who might not know what they are doing. Now their customers are blaming you because they got what they paid for with this untrained dufus. Being in a cynical mood tonight, and being somewhat familiar with the American ways (I'm from northern Europe) that would be a lawsuit in there by somebody. Now your insurance premium skyrocketing, plus your productivity would be going down because you're having to spend so much time with your legal team.
As I said I don't know if I'm right, it might be that UA-cam has told you that your videor need to be no longer than 20-30 minutes. It's happening to a lot of people around the platform, I've heard. In such a short time nobody has the time to go in to the more special interests parts of whatever their content might be.
I do believe that the speaker said after the vacuum machine with HEPA was done, that the restorer bound the spores with alcohol. Maybe that was the actual mold and fungi they stabilized.
I think I'm done being cynical for tonight, so I bid you a good night. Yours, Ann
@@annlidslot8212 😅😅
Excellent work!
The restoration is beautiful, the digital ‘enhancement’ is vile, the colours are over saturated. IMO of course.
I would hve loved to see Baumgartner restore this
I always want to see the restorations done by Julian. I havent found anyone quite like him :) The satisfactions is sadly not here
I don't think he does watercolours - if he did, he'd have done one by now
@@nacekozo I´m quite sure we have´nt even seen the top of the iceberg of work. From all we have, he has done loads of different work and Im sure he has done watercolours aswell :) Anyways, it was just a general statement of love for his work :)
Could the owners have afforded him to do it
I agree, would have been way more satisfying in the end with his care and attention to detail he puts into every project.
Wow and wow beautiful 🎉
I don’t understand, in the frame repair, making the small repairs before the entire frame is cleaned. Is there not a chance that dirt and grime are still present?
I agree, the frame cleaning looked sloppy, cleaning and repairing at the same time. Maybe because I watch another well-known restorer (JB) and am acustom to his meticulous cleaning procedures.
Btw I know he (JB) doesn't do paper conservations or watercolor restorations.
If anyone is wondering about the foil. It's there so the aliens can not find it.
У меня возник вопрос: почему для чистки рамы не используют мягкую зубную щётку? Мне кажется, было бы намного эффективнее, щеткой лучше удаляется грязь из углублений.
Did not get rid of the mold it will just return
Interesting breakdown of this conservation project. No disrespect intended,but I kept silently asking what Julian would do at various points in this project. There are a number of great conservator training styles out there but I've been partial to Julian's methods ever since I found his channel. It's fascinating to see different techniques employed to clean and protect these works and how a conservator's training can alter the piece.
Julian has never done a video of a watercolour....maybe he's too scared to try!
Amazing...!!!
Remarkable.
Nice, but I would appreciate a bit more explanation of materials used and why
Wow!
Magical
Maravilhoso!!!!!
Why are they reusing that old glass?
Because, in general, antique glass has more value than new glass - unless they're trying to have a specialized anti-glare or UV blocking glass.
If it is cleaned and not damaged, there is no reason not to and it keeps the object as original as possible. Of course, re-placement with UV museum glass would protect the painting better from light and cut down on glare.
I appreciate your dedication.
Now impress me, and restore a Bob Ross.
Why aluminum foil?
The pastel overlay is totally unlike the original watercolour, very crude, and sticks out like a sore thumb.
Восхитительно🎉🎉🎉! Россия, Рефтинский!
no one beats Julian ! it's a known fact.
Julian Stan in the house
He never does watercolours. Why is that?
Dont let yourself be brainwashed 😊
"loose material is carefully removed" Just say you chucked it and saved the wooden bits
For my money, the best way to deal with seriously damaged watercolors on paper is not to buy them in the first place, because restoration is so challenging. Respect to this restorer for bringing this disaster back to very presentable form.
It was in the bin
Watercolors are tricky to restore. While she did a fair job of repairing the frame and conserving the paper, there's no real way to restore the actual painting, discoloration, and mold spots without repainting. At the end of the day, this lady finger painted over 25% of an original watercolor with pastels. I think that's a bit heavy handed. I would have restored the paper, removed spots, and let a landscape watercolor artist retouch to the best of their ability.
I feel the same way. Other conservators would not add anything to the painting. Water colors especially can't be reversed with solvents like acrylic or oil paints can. She basically made a new painting
One choice would be to use gouache instead of watercolor to overpaint where needed. It's still water-based, but is more opaque and thus could hide the damaged spots while staying within the spirit of the medium. Many artists use both watercolor and gouache on the same painting to get the effects they desire.
Don't try this at home..... people do! But it takes years of experience, expert training, the proper equipment, endless patience. The other thing - don't let your paintings get into this condition in the first place - I imagine the saving of this one, as well as the huge skill of the conservator of course, was Pearson's use of the most lightfast pigments he could source, and the use of cotton rag paper - I don't know for sure, never having done this, but I would guess wood-pulp paper would have presented even more problems. A treasure saved!
Although - had the painting been of greater value or potential value, you wouldn't have seen a conservator finger painting with pastel ... Even so, despite the negative comments (bearing in mind too that we didn't see everything, including whatever preparation was used to prevent mould recurrence) the process was interesting and, with luck, will give the picture another 100 years of life - after which, if it needs further care and attention, at least the next conservator should have an easier job - maybe apart from that pastel....
wow !
How did they clean the frame ?
What was the aluminum foil for?
Nice job, but as a paper conservator I was surprised that you did not locally reduce mold stains prior to retouching. Also current best practices recommends the use of archival acrylic for glazing rather than glass which can cut paper if the frame falls or is mishandled. Otherwise meticulous work.
Does anyone know the value of the painting?
It was interesting enough for me to watch the whole thing but it would have been better to have heard why you were doing what you were doing.
US$800
Bravissima
I like the frames patina better before the cleaning
It is a shame that, in the top left corner, the paper was so badly stained that pastel had to be used as a concealer. Still, I think it looks much better than leaving the stains showing and obviously you can't use transparent watercolour to do it. I think it's an excellent honest restoration, not an attempt to con anyone that is a perfect painting.
Beatiful job, thanks for sharing!!
How about a very soft toothbrush for the alcohol treatment
Beautiful!
Why wouldn’t you use watercolor to blend the ruined areas? Not criticizing, just wondering.
Was the painting itself cleaned? Or did I miss it?
you missed it - that formed a major part of this video
Yes they cleaned it with soapy water and a sponge 🤣.
The painting is now a very clean white piece of paper .🤣
Harikasınız,insanlık için büyük bir iş yapıyorsunuz.Tebrikler.❤🎉
Hands always behind the cutting edge❗❗❗ If the hand slipped the blade would have cut fingers.
I would have left it in the bin.
i am curious why the frame cant be cleaned with a large brush dipped in alchohol, give it a bath with a brush. Is that because of the gold in the frame?
possibly because of how loose the flakes and plaster were. old frames are much more fragile than new ones, especially after mould and damp damage.
I'm guessing the wood expands and contracts, cracks and warps with a lot of moisture, and also the plaster details. I think the alcohol was used mostly in order to neutralize the mold. But alcohol is a % water. If it didn't have mold, it would have probably only be dry brushed clean, with maybe a few spots cleaned with alcohol.
@@jackfntwist That makes since, thank you.
IDK...is everyone secured that the mold is dead?
A soft scrubbing pad, some bleach, and viola! Easy. :) And run the vacuum over it.
So, the way to restore a watercolour painting is to turn it into a pastel painting.
😂
No. A pastel finger painting.
Pastel was probably used so it is reversible should someone need to do another restoration in the future - over painting would be permanent
Are you an Artist?
@@Calum_S Pastel on paper is not reversible.
Piękny obraz super praca
Cold wax
Nearly 150 years old?
1876
Nice video but the car chase seemed unnecessary
Julian Baumgartner would be having heart palpitations watching this! Whoever was doing this work appears to have the manual dexterity and conservation skills of a 5 year old
nonsense. Julian doesn't even do watercolour or paper conservation/restoration. standard practice is entirely different for different media
Emily O’Reilly is an Accredited Conservator and a Fellow of the International Institute of Conservation with 25 years of experience.
😂😂
Nonsense. This person is obviously a skilled conservator.
@@david.thomas.108it’s more the narrator who not explaining things particularly well!
call me crazy, i think the moldy one looked much more interesting
Why no gloves
I was thinking that.
It's so they can feel the texture of the artwork. Most painting conservators do not wear them
I would have removed that mold with a pressure washer. I got one at Home Depot last year to clean off my patio. 3500 PSI will do the trick.
Funny
I was thinking throw it in the washing machine, but that's a much better idea.
@@francesw.6774 or the dishwasher.
🙋♀️👍
what is your accent?
Oho PH screwdriver in a PZ screw….. so stupid. And is it all done with archival paper, paint and glue?
no - it's done with newspaper, dulux gloss and loctite
U just ruined it more than restoring it
How is that? It was ready for the incinerator pre-restoration. Watercolor and works-on-paper are hard to restore and this brought it a lot of the way back.
It was in the bin. This is a better result than total destruction.
👌🔟👋👋👋👋💯👍
>>>> COST OF RESTORATION 10 TIMES VALUE OF PAINTING, ???????????
Restoration can certainly exceed the value of a painting. It's a choice.
On sale for 800us the story of the painter is extraordinary and her other works are very expensive.
Bohužel bez titulků, škoda. 🥴
Baumgartner must be spinning in his grave.
Disappointed to see this restoration. You can totally see the pastels on top of the watercolor and it does not look good. This restoration was done for me. I’d be very upset.
Would have liked to see this done by someone who can properly narrate and operate a camera... We don't even get to see the final product in a live shot... And wtf was the purpose of the aluminum foil? Doesn't make any sense... Most of the operations never get explained, the audience cannot get engaged because of the horrible camera and narrations.. I'll be clicking do not recommend..
Baumgartner fans hit like this comment lol
Before it was better
I like this channel, you're not that Baumgartner guy, he talks too damn much.
The music and that "instructional" voice really ruined the ASMR effect of this video.
Please use gloves when touching the art
Colors of original painting is better than print one.
Im triggered
Julian stan? Like most of the sycophants here?
Awful mid Atlantic accent but good video .
Thank you so much.