Don't fall for this totally legal scam

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 лип 2024
  • This is a scammy practice that operates in Germany which, as far as I can tell, isn't actually illegal. It is very easy to protect yourself from it: you just need to read things carefully.
    In this video I briefly explain what the practice is and how you can avoid falling for it.
    Chapters:
    00:00 About this video
    00:51 The most common example
    01:45 The trap
    03:42 The right to withdraw?
    04:19 The trap closes
    04:49 How not to fall for it
    Music:
    "Hot Swing"
    by Kevin MacLeod incompetech.com/
    Creative Commons Attribution licence
    ---------
    Send letters and postcards to:
    Rewboss
    Postfach 10 06 29
    63704 Aschaffenburg
    Germany
    Please don't send parcels or packages, or anything that has to be signed for.
  • Навчання та стиль

КОМЕНТАРІ • 355

  • @namenamename390
    @namenamename390 22 дні тому +358

    As my elementary school teacher said; "Wer lesen kann, ist klar im Vorteil".

    • @klauspokorny4381
      @klauspokorny4381 21 день тому +10

      Hier geht es aber wohl weniger um lesen können, sondern eher um lesen wollen.

    • @rarbiart
      @rarbiart 21 день тому +9

      that's called "victim blaming". like blaming people for downloading open source programs from unofficial websites where it's bundled with phishing stuff.

    • @martinc.720
      @martinc.720 21 день тому +4

      @@rarbiart They are not "victims". The website basically says "You don't need to use our services. Bye bye". But people don't read and just pay whatever fee they're asked. They are not bothered with reading a bit. Their fault.

    • @to_loww
      @to_loww 21 день тому +3

      @@martinc.720 Why does their service even exist then?

    • @gogollama
      @gogollama 21 день тому +7

      ​@@martinc.720 oh, yes "Wer lesen kann ist klar im Vorteil". That particularly applies to the guys reading and interpreting the laws in order to find their little loophole to build an absolutely useless online service around. Merely banking on people being rushed, stressed or too unexperienced in navigating online life to catch wind of something fishy going on.
      The website brings no service to the customer but charging their money to the owner's bank account.
      They _are falling victim_ to this provervial trap and this _is_ blaming the victims

  • @Riya-ho5zv
    @Riya-ho5zv 22 дні тому +236

    "Since this is germany it's likely you got some physical paperwork"
    This is the most german thing ever, yes. As long as there's paper there will be germany

    • @John_Weiss
      @John_Weiss 21 день тому +10

      I have a joke:
      "Why does embezzlement never happen in a German bank?"
      "Because it would mess up all the paperwork!"

    • @ImKinoNichtSabbeln
      @ImKinoNichtSabbeln 21 день тому

      Except the younger German generations click blindly on everything that their mobile phone spits put, or blindly follow whatever some jerk on stackoverflow blurbs out, or ChatGPT tells them to do.
      Euphemistically spoken, they spare their brains the labour of understanding, saving their time for the next TikTok-hype/influencer, etc.
      We all failed the Enlightenment.

    • @SianaGearz
      @SianaGearz 18 днів тому +1

      You can also do just about all of these things by fax.
      But not by e-mail or online.

    • @SantaMuerte1813
      @SantaMuerte1813 18 днів тому +3

      In Germany it is likely that when you take your newborn home from the hospital, there is already a letter waiting for them from the department of finances assigning them their tax ID

    • @John_Weiss
      @John_Weiss 18 днів тому +3

      @@SantaMuerte1813 The famous German author, Goethe, had a day job as a lawyer/legal clerk.
      His main work was closing out old cases … from the Holy Roman Empire … _from the 14th Century._
      Like I've said, in the German mind, if there isn't paperwork backing it, it isn't real, never happened, or isn't possible.

  • @TheGreatSteve
    @TheGreatSteve 22 дні тому +130

    I got a letter through the post when the building society I used was sold, saying I was owed money from the sale and that for a fee they'd get me the money. Instead, I took that letter into the building society, and they hooked me up with the cash for free.

    • @Nerobyrne
      @Nerobyrne 13 днів тому

      that's pretty hilarious ^^

  • @alphax4785
    @alphax4785 17 днів тому +18

    It's the same thing in the US, Google search puts third party websites above the government's website and suddenly you're paying $50+ for inputting the same information you had to input on the government site.

  • @jimmyincredible3141
    @jimmyincredible3141 21 день тому +49

    As someone who as always lived in Germany I just learned that I have so far been completely immune to this - because i didn't even consider that official stuff can be done online, and assumed the pinnacle of German bureaucracy was still the fax machine :D

    • @hummel6364
      @hummel6364 10 днів тому +1

      I phone them and/or go to the government office lmao. I still just assume the highest tech the government supports is certified mail.

  • @DFYX
    @DFYX 22 дні тому +86

    It's also very common that when you order something from outside the EU (especially the USA and China) and it's held by customs, you'll get a letter from some company that's loosely associated with whatever logistics company handled the international part of the delivery. They will offer to handle the paperwork for a fee between 30 and 50€. Now, German import tax is a bit complicated but not THAT complicated. Usually you can go to the official website, pick the type of product you ordered from a list of categories (like "clothing, cotton" or "computer parts"), enter the amount you paid and be done with it in less then five minutes.

    • @Heimbasteln
      @Heimbasteln 21 день тому +7

      Maybe if you have done it quite a few times, it took me around 30 minutes the last few times I had to do it.

    • @jonaszswietomierz8017
      @jonaszswietomierz8017 21 день тому +9

      There's a scam in Spain involving receiving a fake SMS from the Post Office saying that you have been charged customs duties and that you have to pay them at some fishy website.
      In reality, the Post service actually handles imports is that it pays the taxes for you and they you only have to pay back the delivery driver in cash once you retreive your package (or at your local office). And you can pay only cash because there's no contactless option, which is a very Spanish thing indeed.

    • @HagenvonEitzen
      @HagenvonEitzen 21 день тому +1

      @@jonaszswietomierz8017 So the Post service perhaps paid a decent amount of taxes upfront when you as receiver may still refuse to accept the package (or perhaps you may lack existence to begin with)??

    • @grmpf
      @grmpf 20 днів тому

      ​@@Heimbasteln As someone who bills by the hour, I see this as the one narrow use case for services like this. Why would I spend 30 minutes on a website that annoys me when I could spend the same amount of time working on something that doesn't annoy me, get paid for that, pay a service €30 for the annoying part, and still have some money left? Unless, of course, the "service" really does basically nothing and it's just as time-consuming as the official route itself.

    • @scifino1
      @scifino1 19 днів тому +1

      @@HagenvonEitzen I'd guess that the risk of that happening is too small to outweigh the convenience to the consumers, so the government covers that with tax money.

  • @rarbiart
    @rarbiart 22 дні тому +91

    "if you want to hide a tree, bring it into the woods".

    • @MiTheMer
      @MiTheMer 22 дні тому +8

      In this case you build the forest around the tree (the official website).

    • @rarbiart
      @rarbiart 21 день тому +4

      @@MiTheMer That's correct, too. (i meant the fact how they hid the mention of not being the official site and that it's free over there... in all the other fine print above and below)

    • @Mrshoujo
      @Mrshoujo 21 день тому

      *take it into
      *bring it with you

    • @martinc.720
      @martinc.720 21 день тому

      @@Mrshoujo You know exactly what they mean

    • @holger_p
      @holger_p 19 днів тому

      @@martinc.720 we will never upgrade our language, when we stop it at " you know what I mean "

  • @fonkbadonk5370
    @fonkbadonk5370 22 дні тому +69

    I've seen the reddit thread this must have originated from, and was in disbelief by how strongly you were opposed to there. Thank you for doing such a great service!

    • @gab_gallard
      @gab_gallard 21 день тому +4

      Not using Reddit anymore, otherwise I would try to search for the thread myself, but what were the arguments that people used to defend this thing?

    • @PrawnAddiction
      @PrawnAddiction 21 день тому

      How strongly?

    • @wohlhabendermanager
      @wohlhabendermanager 21 день тому

      That's just one of the reasons I avoid this particular subreddit like the plague. It's full of idiots, and the moderators there aren't any better.

    • @gordybrown3667
      @gordybrown3667 20 днів тому

      Why was he being opposed? Do you know the name of the thread as I'd like to look at it myself

    • @fonkbadonk5370
      @fonkbadonk5370 19 днів тому +15

      @@gab_gallard Interestingly two ways: One poster criticized him for not calling it an outright illegal scam, another didn't see the scammy aspect since it technically is a legal thing to do. Both were wrong imho, since as Andrew says: Something that skirts the legal boundary on the inside can still be nefarious and predatory, hence a scam. But legal.

  • @Motorov
    @Motorov 21 день тому +14

    I have to say, some things on this channel are really informative, even for a native german speaker and resident. Thank you for your good work!

  • @dsego84
    @dsego84 21 день тому +8

    There are unofficial websites selling slovenian motorway e-vignettes for more money than the official site. In Croatia there is also a scam where a private company tracks newly opened businesses and sends a proforma invoice in the mail to get included in a "national business registry". You can just throw these in the garbage bin ,but people think it's something official and want to avoid fines so they just pay the invoice.

    • @jonaszswietomierz8017
      @jonaszswietomierz8017 21 день тому

      The channel HONEST GUIDE exposed a scam where they overcharged foreign drivers at vignette kiosks in Czechia.

  • @ICTman
    @ICTman 21 день тому +19

    This used to be a big thing in the UK too - purported "check and send" services that operated just on the right side of the law to justify their fee. They'd use search ads on things like EHICs/GHICs, Passports, US ESTA, etc. I looked a few up for examples now, though - mostly gone, for some reason.

    • @embreis2257
      @embreis2257 21 день тому

      would be interesting to know _why_ these services stopped to place ads - or are they all gone?

    • @ICTman
      @ICTman 21 день тому +3

      I think the wonderful Martin Lewis kicked up a fuss about it, which got the government interested, so Google decided it would start blocking ads on common searches for UK bureaucracy. That's my theory anyway, no idea if that's true.

    • @TheEulerID
      @TheEulerID 21 день тому

      @@ICTman It was something like that. Google has actually been accepting money to put these scam sites at the top of the searches. Those are the "sponsored" ones you often find when looking for services, such as booking a hotel.
      Even Google backed down in the face of concerted bad publicity and the threat of new laws/regulations.

  • @elfo7918
    @elfo7918 22 дні тому +60

    Moment, das muss man machen?
    Ich hab einfach immer gewartet bis ich von denen Angeschrieben wurde, dass die Zahlung überfällig ist. Gefunden haben die mich immer.

    • @rewboss
      @rewboss  22 дні тому +32

      Das kann funktionieren, aber man soll sich lieber nicht darauf vertrauen. Nicht, dass was schief geht und du auch noch Mahngebühren zahlen muss.

    • @fonkbadonk5370
      @fonkbadonk5370 22 дні тому +1

      Waren die ersten mit einem "Kondolenzbrief" nach dem Tod meines Vaters (nicht ganz 2 Wochen danach, und natürlich war die wichtige Frage, wo sie demnächst abbuchen sollen), noch bevor die Stadtverwaltung, das Finanzamt und so ziemlich alle anderen abseits von Familie, Rechtsanwalt und Steuerberater davon erfahren haben. Sowohl für ihn als Privatperson, als auch seine kleine Firma.
      Der Beitrag scheint hoch genug zu sein, tausende an Detektiven zu beschäftigen, die solche Fälle in Lichtgeschwindigkeit ermitteln. Einfach nur ekelhaft.

    • @mischmaZOOO
      @mischmaZOOO 21 день тому +8

      Stimmt! Auf diese Weise hatten wir uns empfindliche Mahngebühren eingehandelt. Sollte man also lieber nicht machen

    • @TheYoutubeUser69
      @TheYoutubeUser69 21 день тому +9

      lmao! die wollten mich letztens mit iwie 3k€ rechung bummsen obwohl ich bei eltern wohn. die sind so lost, wunder, dass die dich gefunden habe tbh

    • @manub.3847
      @manub.3847 21 день тому

      Wer seine Daten nicht online eingeben möchte, kann auch bei manchen Sparkassen,-Volks-und Postbanken die Formulare erhalten.

  • @tomokig2655
    @tomokig2655 22 дні тому +16

    In court you still may have a high ground. Since they hide their fee by "strategily" arranging their page the contract itself can be compromised. Also adding a "surprise" in the Terms of Services can also be fought. All important contract information has to be visible AND understandable for the potential customer.
    But since the "fee" is so low most people do not sue - that might be much more expensive.
    My advice is to contact the Consumer Center in your region and inform about this kind of pseudo-legal operations.

    • @rewboss
      @rewboss  22 дні тому +12

      Consumer organisations already know about this one, and all they can do is warn against it. The problem is that the information is very easily accessible to everyone. The terms of service are short and written in very clear, everyday German, and make it very clear exactly what the service is. The fee is clearly stated during the sign-up process before the customer makes a final decision. The contact information is also given in accordance with German law. The only thing that is actually devious is including the important information on the home page inside a longer and irrelevant text, but that's unlikely to stand up in court because it's repeated in multiple other places, including in the ToS which the customer has to confirm that they have read and agree to before in order to place an order.

    • @sebastiant4597
      @sebastiant4597 21 день тому +5

      Even the attempt to criminalize those services by court ruling under current legislation would bust the BGB and has the potential of being highly unconstitutional.
      German law allows for trading any shit at any price as long as buyer and seller BOTH agree on
      a) it's shit
      b) the price is fair market value.
      Legally there are only obstacles when the potentially scammed part of the deal wasn't mentally fit to grasp the peculiarities of the contract.
      In this case you'd need to set all Germans to be "zu dumm ein Loch in den Schnee zu pissen" [complete morons] by default, potentially questioning all written contracts with a body of over 10 lines of text.

    • @tomokig2655
      @tomokig2655 21 день тому +7

      @@sebastiant4597 But you forget that by EU and German law you have to disclose all relevant contract parts clear and open before a contact can become valid. Hiding a fee in in a paragraph which is not relevant or in the AGB is not legit.
      The main issue is that the fee is not high enough that you would consider going to court - the cost is in no relation to the outcome. Since Germany has no punitive damages you are getting in best case your fee and the cost of your lawyer back...

    • @sebastiant4597
      @sebastiant4597 21 день тому

      @@tomokig2655 1. The Fee is not hidden.
      It's even repeatedly stated multiple times throughout the process in quite short text blocks.
      2. The Intention is not obscured.
      The websites do in fact point out that you can get the same service for free at the official website.
      That's what I was referring to when talking about written contracts with more than 10 lines of text. If you want to hold the ground that any text longer than 10 lines is potentially obfuscating information and thus "go over your head" you couldn't even hire a lawyer. 😂😂
      If you want to be an adult, be treated like an adult and do business like an adult, there'll be a minimum of due diligence expected to be endured.

    • @HappyBeezerStudios
      @HappyBeezerStudios 21 день тому

      @@sebastiant4597 It's not quite everything that you can trade. Can't sell anything illegal. As in, explicitly made illegal elsewhere.
      But it does indeed offer a very open market.

  • @Ausknutz
    @Ausknutz 18 днів тому +3

    I was made aware of this when I arrived in Germany to live in a building owned by the university where I currently work. They gave me some papers explaining how the Rundfunkbeitrag works, the correct website to enroll and making it clear the official website does not charge any processing fee.

  • @floriantischner8850
    @floriantischner8850 22 дні тому +19

    Just commenting so the spam-bots aren't the only interaction on the video.

  • @Felisquoreda
    @Felisquoreda 21 день тому +4

    I believe these websites do not only exist for our official bureaucracy, but also if you want to end any contract.
    Some years ago I wanted to end my data plan and I wanted Google to tell me, which information needed to be in my letter and how it should look (I could not believe that it could be simple.) And all the result were like "give us your information, were gonna do the work for you". I did not feel comfortable just giving this to strangers on the Internet so I didn't fall for the scam.

  • @GreyFox474
    @GreyFox474 21 день тому +22

    Honestly, from the intro I thought this would be about Steuererklärung-Software.

    • @Tenajeh
      @Tenajeh 18 днів тому +1

      Er hat ja gesagt, dass diese Taktik auch für andere bürokratischen Prozesse genutzt wird. Steuererklärung ist nur einer von so vielen.

  • @parsifal6094
    @parsifal6094 21 день тому +3

    A very important video!!
    Same with the refunds for a late train in the DB. If your train is at least 60 minutes late, you can fill out a form online or on paper and get at least a 25% refund. The process is easy and free of charge.
    Lately there are multiple shady companies in the internet that claim that "the process is complicated and slow". And that is a lie. They would send the application for you and charge you with 30% of your refund.
    Fill the form only via a DB official website!!

    • @schwingedeshaehers
      @schwingedeshaehers 21 день тому +1

      if you have the app, it 3 or 4 button presses iirc

    • @weppwebb2885
      @weppwebb2885 19 днів тому +1

      I think it's pretty annoying to do, even though it isn't a lot of clicks. Thing is, even if you make someone else claim your refund, you still have to put in the data, so zero time saved xD
      (most annoying part is that you can't enter a arrival time in the future, so you can't do it while still stuck on the train). Also the last time i was four hours late I just got a letter telling me it was "external circumstaces" and not their fault.

  • @PascalGienger
    @PascalGienger 21 день тому +9

    In the US a similar legal scam is to land on a 3rd party service to do the ESTA travel autorization request on your behalf for a higher fee than CBP charges. We call it a stupidity tax.
    Many tourists fall into this

    • @thornback5641
      @thornback5641 21 день тому +1

      We also pay tax twice on phones 🤣🤣🤣

    • @Fl4shback
      @Fl4shback 20 днів тому

      In Germany the word stupidity tax (Dummensteuer) is used for the state organized lottery

    • @PascalGienger
      @PascalGienger 20 днів тому +1

      @@Fl4shback Here in the US, too. State lottery players just pay voluntary tax to the States without feeling like taxed. :) That is why those lotteries exist, it is a huge income for the states.

    • @weppwebb2885
      @weppwebb2885 19 днів тому +2

      Every scam is a stupidity tax. So are a lot of accidents people die in. That doesn't make it right does it? Everyone is stupid sometimes, just a little tired/ already overworked is all it takes.

    • @yaush_
      @yaush_ 18 днів тому

      It’s not a tax because the money doesn’t go to the government. If it actually was a tax then I’d less of a problem with it because the money was going to the benefit of the public but this money is just going to some random person who scams people.

  • @ryanmcseveney7641
    @ryanmcseveney7641 21 день тому +3

    There's similar 'Scams' here.
    I worked for the CSCS card scheme processing and sending cards for people to work on active sites.
    The cost was £30. There are dozens of sites that charge up to 10 times as much for the same service.

  • @unconventionalideas5683
    @unconventionalideas5683 18 днів тому +2

    Keep doing good work like this!

  • @juyjuka
    @juyjuka 21 день тому +4

    Thank you rewboss.

  • @shinyagumon7015
    @shinyagumon7015 22 дні тому +10

    Huh, that's the first time I ever heard of such a thing, but that's probably because I haven't moved in a while and almost exclusively do all my correspondence with the government either in person or through mail.
    But I get why people fall for this because German bureaucracy can be exhausting, so I get that some people feel inclined to pay someone else to do it to get it off their hands.

    • @LarsPW
      @LarsPW 22 дні тому +2

      The thing is, that you do not correspond with the government here. The public broadcasters have to be "far away" from state.

    • @gargoyle7863
      @gargoyle7863 21 день тому

      @@LarsPW The public broadcasters are "a state within a state" specialized in wasting the taxpayers money.

  • @xZimblx
    @xZimblx 21 день тому

    Very interesting video, never heard of this "scam". We've been living in this apartment since 2011, though, so no communication necessary for quite some time.

  • @brun4775
    @brun4775 21 день тому +2

    It’s the same as the scammers who file claims for you when your flight is cancelled or delayed and then take a massive cut of the compensation you are statutorily entitled to.

  • @tarickw
    @tarickw 22 дні тому +37

    but why would you notify them? when you move, you register with the town and they notify them and you get a letter asking for clarification and guidance on what to do.

    • @feedbackzaloop
      @feedbackzaloop 22 дні тому +3

      5:10 moment, yes. Never knew about these websites too because always had to deal with it via letters

  • @florian-249
    @florian-249 21 день тому +1

    Seeing your comment on reddit about this, I knew from the title what this video is about.^^

  • @DelfinaKS
    @DelfinaKS 4 дні тому

    It is good you educate us about these scams but I think those lazy people who keep clicking next without reading the text, they do deserve to be scammed every once in a while - I am happy that this type of "legal" scam exists. At least, more people will understand the importance of reading the text before clicking "I Agree" to it! At the same time, it is good you make these videos to create awareness about the issue. Overall, we want more people who are really literate.

  • @mats7492
    @mats7492 22 дні тому +6

    I had one guest at my door pretending to be from the „NDR“ and asked me to let him in to check if I had any radio..
    I told him that I’m calling the police if he doesn’t leave…
    He ran off after that..

    • @moonraker978
      @moonraker978 22 дні тому +1

      But that was more than ten years ago, gelle?

    • @xaverlustig3581
      @xaverlustig3581 22 дні тому +7

      Inspectors like that actually did exist, before the fee became mandatory for everyone.

    • @fipse
      @fipse 22 дні тому

      ​@@xaverlustig3581 They did exist but had no rights to actual enter your home.

    • @DFYX
      @DFYX 22 дні тому

      @@xaverlustig3581 They still didn't have the right to enter your apartment or house without permission because of Artikel 13 GG. That's the reason why they often lied and told people they sell newspaper subscriptions or whatever just so you'd let them inside.

    • @mats7492
      @mats7492 22 дні тому +3

      @@xaverlustig3581 But they had ZERO authority. They were just regular people paid to ask people if they had paid. . Lying about their actual authority was certainly illegal..

  • @HagenvonEitzen
    @HagenvonEitzen 21 день тому

    Somehow this reminds me of the offers for "highly visible ads" one used to receive in the olden days from "Our firm name sounds almost like we might be the official phone directory publisher" -- and the offer was actually for some obscure directory to be published in an edition of just a handful of copies :)

  • @Hahnson
    @Hahnson 21 день тому +1

    We have this in Sweden also , leaving the church for example, it is not illegal either

  • @nautilusshell4969
    @nautilusshell4969 11 днів тому

    A fraud is a financial advantage gained by deceit. I work for the financial crime section of a bank preventing payment fraud made via transfer (rather than using credit or debit cards). It's amazing how many people are caught out by this kind of thing, despite all the warnings.....

  • @TheGasMaskGuy96
    @TheGasMaskGuy96 12 днів тому

    While I'm really mad at most official websites of the german gov and their services for being overcomplicated and sometimes stupid in design, the changing of your details on the GEZ website is really easy to use. Never had issues with it, unlike with other services.

  • @COPKALA
    @COPKALA 22 дні тому +2

    The same exist for the service that gather information of one's credit worthy-ness in Germany.
    BTW there is the same for asking for the visum substitute for entry in many Countries (I almost got into when filing for enter USA or Australia)...

  • @avarionargos
    @avarionargos 22 дні тому +3

    While I am no fan of this behavior, I am impressed.

  • @Nerobyrne
    @Nerobyrne 13 днів тому

    The funniest story was that I was drunk once, and bought a subscription to a shady dating website for 200 euros.
    I later realized how dumb this was, and checked their terms of service.
    And although it is legal to waive your RtW, their ToS did not include such a clause.
    And since you can give any reason, I messaged them saying that I use my right because "I was drunk".
    They wrote back with, and this is a quote:
    "Unfortunately that doesn't apply here :'("
    Well, I guess they knew that was BS because they never disputed the charge-back ^.^

  • @eldrago19
    @eldrago19 12 днів тому

    We have a similar thing in the UK, especially around claiming benefits or road tax.

  • @dianamartinez1905
    @dianamartinez1905 20 днів тому

    thank you!

  • @martinsutoob
    @martinsutoob 21 день тому +1

    Not sure if this is related, but I had to shell out 40 euros to an organisation that now seems to have its tentacles embedded into a huge number of services and sales activities and who you can immediately recognise because every one of them has a name that ends with the number 24. To this day I have no idea what I clicked to tip me into this trap - I'm normally quite savvy about these things. But there you go. Objections were futile and they kept their filthy mits on my money. However, in the long run, their cheap tricks lost them more than they made. It's that "24" thing. It's like a red flag now saying "Danger - Avoid".

  • @namensklauer
    @namensklauer 21 день тому +2

    I dont like the Rundfunkbeitrag, but i guess it is necessary, so that they can keep producing at least 2 "new" crime films per week with third grade actors following the same story line every time and of course including commercial breaks.

    • @feynstein1004
      @feynstein1004 20 днів тому +1

      😂😂 As a foreigner, I actually like the Rundfunkbeitrag because it lets me stream German shows to improve my German.

  • @fsturmat
    @fsturmat 11 днів тому +1

    Germans are willing to endure a state of perpetuous humiliation, but for your very own sake, don't insult the Rundfunkbeitrag. Simply calling it by its rightful names, like "tax" or "scam", will make you have enemies.
    Same applies to public health insurance / Krankenkasse.

  • @michaelkoelbl4004
    @michaelkoelbl4004 11 днів тому

    The "Feinstaubplakette" is another classic. Any car you buy should already have it but just in case you don't, there are plenty of middlemen who will do you the service for 15-20€ which seems reasonable - until you realise thing only costs 5,95€ if you buy it directly from the authorities- for example the Berlin, at the "Landesamt für Bürger- und Ordnungsangelegenheiten" and they will send you a Plakette for any car registered in Germany to anywhere in Germany (you don't need a connection to Berlin). But very typical.

  • @Bluedino549
    @Bluedino549 20 днів тому

    They do a similar thing with license plates. You can reserve and order license plates from websites that are not the official ones. Suddenly, a pair of plates costs twice as much. And unlike the official source, they don't check whether your custom letter-number combo is already registered.

  • @dasreicht
    @dasreicht 21 день тому

    The UK has these too for driving licence applications etc. I'm not sure why they haven't been outlawed yet, they just put warnings in literature saying something like "make sure you used the gov.uk website or you may be charged an extra fee".

  • @egbront1506
    @egbront1506 8 днів тому

    Such scam sites exist in the UK, particularly for the DVLA. They even go as far as to use the branding and website design of the DVLA so that you really think you are on the official website.

  • @GroovingPict
    @GroovingPict 7 днів тому

    Im amazed that "efficient Germany" hasnt done what we've done here in Norway, which is to remove the "TV license" (as it's called here) as a separate bill, and instead incorporate it into people's taxes. You still pay the "TV license" fee, but it's automatically done along with the rest of your taxes that your employer deducts from your paycheck. It's still a controversial fee here in Norway as well, but less so now that it's sort of more hidden rather than a separate (and substantial) bill you get sent in the post

    • @rewboss
      @rewboss  7 днів тому

      It's not legally possible in Germany. Taxes can't be earmarked for specific purposes. Also, the fee is levied on households, not wage earners, so that would just lead to extra bureaucracy: employers would have to deduct different amounts from employees' pay depending on how many other wage-earners are living at the same address.

  • @1234321JR
    @1234321JR 9 днів тому

    This is indeed good to know

  • @bomcabedal
    @bomcabedal 21 день тому

    Good PSA. The problem shouldn't exist if people didn't feel intimidated by the bureaucracy, of course, so any service helping them manage the system will be well-received. And there are other reasons. In the past I've used a service to get my Deutsche Bahn or delayed airplane tickets back. While they skim 30% (openly), they do also transfer the money the same day, instead of you having to wait for three months and correspond with an uncooperative company.

  • @The2wanderers
    @The2wanderers 20 днів тому

    This is becoming common everywhere, I think. Particularly common in tourism (visas and tax collection type functions.)

  • @mancubwwa
    @mancubwwa 4 дні тому

    It's the same with visas for various countries - plenty of 3rd party websites telling you they would help process evisa for you, just for a little fee. The added problem is that the visa do cost money and people don't know how much, and theses sites are often in better Englush than original ones, so they fall even more easily

  • @dobythedog
    @dobythedog 2 дні тому

    This used to be a thing a few years back in the UK. I think there was a bit of a crackdown on it though. They made the websites look exactly like the official government sites.

  • @gehteuchnixan69
    @gehteuchnixan69 22 дні тому

    Ganz ehrlich, Respekt. Schöner Sidehustle.

  • @rgbx6923
    @rgbx6923 18 днів тому

    In my opinion that's sittenwidrig, and therefore probably illegal, as:
    1. they make you think you are in the normal process.
    2. they don't offer any benefit.
    However 30€ isn't worth sueing, especially when you can probably loose hundreds for court fees.
    This is a problem with a lot of things, and we definitely need class action lawsuits in Germany!

  • @debildevil
    @debildevil 19 днів тому

    From the start of the video I thought you were talking about Steuerberater 😂

  • @user-hm9is5ke9i
    @user-hm9is5ke9i 18 днів тому

    For some reason my wife and I get this TV tax invoice separately. They seem like they are two different organizations representing ARD ZDF Rundfunk. One seems to be Germany wide and the other for Berlin-Brandenburg. How can I tell one about the other so I can stop paying both?

  • @andrewcox6863
    @andrewcox6863 16 днів тому

    I reported this and another ad to Google citing Google's Government Services Policy. Both my reports were turned down, but searching today I only see the official site. Have the ads been taken down?

  • @blablagame3914
    @blablagame3914 16 днів тому

    One of my parents works in public service and they always complain how stupid all the people that don't directly apply through them are

  • @understandingcompanylaw6576
    @understandingcompanylaw6576 17 днів тому

    There is something similar in Australia for company registration

  • @marge2548
    @marge2548 21 день тому

    Interesting.
    Have never heard of that one before, or only in connection with having a nee car registered. (That, however, can be such an ordeal in some cities that hiring someone to help might not seem unreasonable at least at first sight).
    I suppose the reason why I never encountered this before is that when we got registered for the broadcasting fee, online was still mainly supposed to refer to laundry and everything official was on paper. And only on paper.

  • @liamnoone9381
    @liamnoone9381 17 днів тому

    There is a common scam in the UK where you go to a certain place where someone performs something with fruit, veg, and meat, hands it to you and charges you loads of money. Something you could easily perform at home yourself.

    • @Simon-xt8mv
      @Simon-xt8mv 8 днів тому

      It is more like going to get takeout but realizing that the drive-through is not affiliated with the restaurant and that they are actually concealing the real drive-through to the restaurant.

  • @sevret313
    @sevret313 11 днів тому

    Such a site is a clear cut scam in my opinion. If the site only exist to trick people, then no amount of disclaimers should protect the owners from jail.

  • @runarandersen878
    @runarandersen878 21 день тому +1

    This isn’t only a German thing. I saw something similar about applying for Visa for travel to the US.

  • @elton1981
    @elton1981 21 день тому

    Got caught similarly when applying for an EHIC, back when brits could have one.

  • @manub.3847
    @manub.3847 21 день тому

    A similar "rip-off" also occurs when searching for: "apply for a police clearance certificate".
    The money is usually sent to the Netherlands or Lithuania or somewhere else by bank transfer (non-returnable) and you only receive a pamphlet with information about the police clearance certificate. (if at all)
    However, you can apply for the clearance certificate via your local authority (Ortsamt) or, in some authorities, via the local homepage with a digital ID card.

  • @nils9853
    @nils9853 11 днів тому

    There is a similar "scam" for letting your paper mail, which is still adressed to the old location, be forwarded to the new location for 6 month or so.
    You can book this directly via the German Postal Service for 35 Euro or so, or you follow the first Google result and pay 99 Euro. They will pass your information to the Postal Service and it will work. But you just paid 65 Euro for some script Copy and Pasting your data.

  • @georgantonischki1188
    @georgantonischki1188 21 день тому

    same trap can be found when getting a crit‘air sticker for your car. Official French website is about €3.64 but several sites offer you this service for like €20

  • @paulhubsch5111
    @paulhubsch5111 20 днів тому

    For a second, I thought he was talking about the Rundfunkbeitrag itself

  • @jamesodell3064
    @jamesodell3064 9 днів тому

    Why does Google give you this company first rather then the governmental agency that you wanted?
    It is called a contribution, but it is mandatory. Call it what you want but if something is mandatory it is NOT a contribution, but is a tax.

  • @tiapina7048
    @tiapina7048 21 день тому

    Great public service. Even if it doesn't apply to me. 😀

  • @AlessAbreu
    @AlessAbreu 21 день тому

    Boy they do have all their tracks covered - their disclaimer seems to be pretty straightforward that makes it arguing in court really difficult

  • @Deckzwabber
    @Deckzwabber 18 днів тому

    Google should really stop listing these kind of sites

  • @phosphoros60
    @phosphoros60 20 днів тому

    So, theoretically, am I 100% safe if the website in question shows the ARD, ZDF, Deutschlandfunk Logos? Because those are bound to be trademarked, right? Using them would be illegal for the scammers, surely?

  • @Vampirzaehnchen
    @Vampirzaehnchen 21 день тому +1

    I wouldn't call this a scam. You get what you came for. The question is why there is a service for this. It wouldn't last if nobody "fell for it".

  • @joyphobic
    @joyphobic 22 дні тому +10

    the other thing being the Schufa "service"

    • @mischmaZOOO
      @mischmaZOOO 21 день тому

      Die Schufa bietet allerdings sehr viele Dienstleistungen mit Mehrwert an. Muss man nicht gut finden, aber es ist nicht so, dass die nichts tun.

    • @joyphobic
      @joyphobic 21 день тому

      @@mischmaZOOO I did mine for 30 euros before finding out they can give it to you per email for free. All that is for them to print out a certificate with your Schufa credit and send it to you (at least there's no shipping fees...) I just came to Germany and my german is only at B1 level, now I know better

    • @eisikater1584
      @eisikater1584 21 день тому

      @@mischmaZOOO Kann schon sein, aber die Schufa-Selbstauskuft (oder wie das heißt) ist einmal jährlich kostenlos, soweit ich weiß. Dafür musste allerdings erst ein Gesetz her, sonst hätten die dafür weiter Geld kassiert, und manchmal braucht man den Wisch eben, auch wenn da nichts drinsteht.

  • @AlphaHorst
    @AlphaHorst 12 днів тому

    This assumes there are people who run after the ARD ZDF and don't wait for the letters asking you to pay.
    Fun fact.
    German administration is not allowed to share your personal data with anyone, not even other sub administrations outside of their area (hence why you need to run around with bags of papers if you move from.one administration area to the next). But they are not only allowed but required to hand over yoir personal data to the Beitragsservice. So when you move homes and register under the new address the Beitragsservice is automatically informed of your new address. The same goes for changing your name and so on.
    So there is absolutely 0 need to ever do anything until the Beitragsservice sends you a letter. Then the work starts.

    • @rewboss
      @rewboss  12 днів тому

      Except that sometimes when people try this, they end up paying late fees.

    • @AlphaHorst
      @AlphaHorst 12 днів тому

      @rewboss that is illigal.
      Late fees can only be applied after the first warning has already been issued. And a warning can only be issued after the initial claim was made. For late fees to be legal, two letters have to be sent first.(exception is when the sender can prove that additional costs fell upon them by sending the letter, in that case they can charge you for that amount)
      Depending on where you move the Beitragsservice has to issue you a new number so in every case they have to be the first to make contact and they get your data the same day as you re-register.
      That the Beitragsservice does not follow the law in this case is already known. I advise everyone to double check their invoice every time. The Beitragsservice also hides late fees in normal invoices but those are also illigal. (This only applies to those who pay month by month)
      In one case when I was a student they lost my BAfög invoice for the year 2016/17 and in 2019 I hit a letter claiming I owe them around 650€. This included 28€ of late fees for each month never mentioned anywhere in the invoice. I could prove beyond a doubt that I was "free" by proving I received BAfög. They still wanted the late fees as well as 3 months of payment. Because the concept of BAfög legally lasting exactly one year from October to October was to much for them. The city I lived in had to take over and send me an apology for the inconvenience. (They send my BAfög letter in my place due to circumstances)
      Most stressful year in my life because of the Beitragsservice refusing to follow german law.

  • @luigigaminglp
    @luigigaminglp 20 днів тому

    There are add-ons that specifically block googles sponsored results.

  • @gargoyle7863
    @gargoyle7863 21 день тому

    We are in a real legal grey zone here. They neither really hide the relevant facts nor they overprice the service (if they would ask 300€ instead 30€ we might be in § 138 (2) BGB "extortion"). So you're probably right and one could lose this in court.

    • @schwingedeshaehers
      @schwingedeshaehers 21 день тому +1

      extortion? i don't think it is extortion, for extortion the price is normally irrelevant, as you need a force/thread of force
      i think it would be "wucher" (usury).

    • @holger_p
      @holger_p 19 днів тому

      It's like selling canned air. You have to know you get it for free by yorself.

  • @LiamMcBride
    @LiamMcBride 20 днів тому

    Sounds like GovPlus in the United States, a third party company that charges money to file paperwork that you can do yourself for free directly with the government

  • @robertnett9793
    @robertnett9793 3 дні тому

    It's a little less moral version of 'Let-me-google-that-for-you' :D

  • @JonatanMiles
    @JonatanMiles 17 днів тому

    seen this before.....try to process an ESTA VISA waiver to enter the US, there are many sites doing this

  • @soundscape26
    @soundscape26 21 день тому

    Google is complicit with these (and worse) practices by being totally careless with the sponsored results they put on top of the search page.

  • @panda4247
    @panda4247 11 днів тому

    "This scam [...] operates for other mundane bureaucratic processes [...]"
    Tor example the tax recondiliation form (or however you call it in your country?). It's perfectly easy to do, yet there are many companies/tax advisors who'll gladly do it for you for a fee. I get it why a company would hire their services, but as an individual with income from work and maybe if you are renting something (house), it's literally easy as hell in my country...
    I'm not saying that "processing" this "broadcast fee" is a service I would pay 30 € for, or that it is good/moral of that company to set a service like that....
    Just saying, that there are multiple things that one person may find easy to do by themselves, and somebody else may be willing to pay 3rd party to do it (and also take responsibility that it is done correctly, I suppose)

  • @ChrisWar666
    @ChrisWar666 21 день тому

    Ack, there are these quasi-legal websites here in Brazil that do the same. But the ads they pay for in Google always use something sooooo similar to the official government websites' name or title I'd say it is actually a phishing site....

    • @rewboss
      @rewboss  21 день тому

      It's phishing if they use the site to gather login details so they can, for example, access your bank account. That's not what this site does.

  • @EmperorNefarious1
    @EmperorNefarious1 18 днів тому

    This is like paying for online tax service in the US. If you don't know it should be free you can get scammed into a dumb service.

  • @dombo813
    @dombo813 20 днів тому

    Sounds like a search engine problem to me. Google already has no problem blocking sites it doesnt like from appearing in search results, it should just block these sites too.

  • @oclanis840
    @oclanis840 21 день тому

    I fell for the same Trick, trying to leave the Church Tax.

  • @NatasDuVall
    @NatasDuVall 21 день тому +2

    Germans: Scamming people the honourable way by telling them upfront that they are going to be scammed :D

  • @MS-sd1uz
    @MS-sd1uz 7 днів тому

    Deny all claims and fight the contract with 119 BGB. Typically they will hire some debt collectors but not follow through

  • @baritonfelix
    @baritonfelix 21 день тому

    Never heard of this one. Not a lawyer either, but I think there might still be a (somewhat shaky) case to prosecute this as fraud (§ 263 StGB) if anybody bothered.

    • @rewboss
      @rewboss  21 день тому

      I doubt it. For that to stick, the accused would have had to have told lies, misrepresented the truth, or concealed important facts. That doesn't seem to be the case here.

  • @hurtigheinz3790
    @hurtigheinz3790 20 днів тому

    How much money did they make with this kind of scam? 30€? 60€?
    As a German I'd never think about telling the GEZ/Beitragsservice my new address or name (after a marriage). I'd tell this kind of information the Einwohnermeldamt, and then assume all public services know my personal information.

  • @rosaecrux
    @rosaecrux 17 днів тому +1

    Well, maybe.
    But is it not noteworthy that these websites are seemingly better designed than the originals that people spend their money on a more simplistic website?
    Maybe it is just another case of where the German way is too confusing for Germans themselves.

  • @sejtam
    @sejtam 21 день тому

    And will they resell the data you hand them to data brokers?

    • @rewboss
      @rewboss  21 день тому

      I can neither confirm nor deny that, but I've not yet seen any evidence that they do.

    • @schwingedeshaehers
      @schwingedeshaehers 21 день тому

      ​@@rewbossif there was no mention that they do, that would be highly illegal, and enough that it is worth sueing/notifing the "Datenschutzbeauftragten"

  • @thetj8243
    @thetj8243 21 день тому

    and they are not just collecting an unnecessary fee, you also give them your address and bank details that they maybe (I have not read their TOS) also might sell for profit 🤷

  • @pqlasmdhryeiw8
    @pqlasmdhryeiw8 16 днів тому +1

    QR code?! In Germany? You mean Faxabrufnummer...

  • @minirop
    @minirop 21 день тому

    You can't attack them because they stated everywhere they are a third-party, but would it be possible to use their legitimacy of handling of personal data (if they don't have any)? (not because you were tricked, but by someone like NOYB)

    • @rewboss
      @rewboss  21 день тому

      You consent to them using your personal data.

  • @benedikt5974
    @benedikt5974 21 день тому +1

    How to make sure you are on the official website of a German institution: If it's easy to use - it's not the official one! ;)

    • @HappyBeezerStudios
      @HappyBeezerStudios 21 день тому

      Meh, the official Bundestag website has a pretty good overview over who sits where, by which method they got their seat, and from which state they come. Including a well done interactive graphic.

    • @feynstein1004
      @feynstein1004 20 днів тому +1

      Underrated comment 😂😂

  • @TheBadVideoMaker
    @TheBadVideoMaker 10 днів тому

    This is less of a problem in the UK where the government have worked to solve this issue - one of the rare things that the Tories have done something right during their 14 years in office.

  • @uuu12343
    @uuu12343 21 день тому

    In most situations, this is considered as typosquatting but of course, germany lets this be legal and therefore - legal typosquatting

    • @rewboss
      @rewboss  21 день тому

      It's not really typosquatting, although that particular website does have a domain name that looks official. It's not a mere typo away, though -- it's not like they registered "rundfunkbetrag.de", for example -- so it would be difficult to sue for typosquatting.

    • @darthplagueis13
      @darthplagueis13 21 день тому

      I don't think it can be considered typosquatting because they're not pretending to be the official website.

  • @feedbackzaloop
    @feedbackzaloop 22 дні тому +1

    Feels like providing service that doesn't benefit consumer, cost them next to nothing yet adds up to substantial profits is far far from being limited to this particular case.
    Class action should deal with them, doesn't it though?

    • @Xerlash
      @Xerlash 22 дні тому +1

      to sue for what? theyre telling you dead in the eye, that this service is optional. and legally youre free to pay people for whatever is offered. as long as they provide the service they promised correctly and dont trick you into something its perfectly fine.
      someone could open a service to burn your money and charge a fee for it and it probably would be fine aswell, as long as theyre being transparent about the service. youre a mature person, no one protecting you from plain stupid expenses..
      ...also i guess part of their success is due to people thinking it makes dealing with bureaucracy easier, like doing tax declaration for you. - in this case it just dosnt simplify anything, cause the task was as easy in the first place
      Edit: butchered "bureaucracy"

    • @berndbrotify
      @berndbrotify 22 дні тому +5

      Class action doesn’t exist in Germany, like it does in the USA. Also, being a service that doesn’t benefit the customer, costs next to nothing and adds up to substantial profits doesn’t make a service illegal. Otherwise horoscopes, homeopathy and joining a gym between Christmas and New Year’s Eve would all be illegal.

    • @feedbackzaloop
      @feedbackzaloop 21 день тому +1

      @@berndbrotify true, nothing is like USA legal system. But as we speak English here this is the choice of words.
      Malpractice is still malpractice. Disclaimer or not but intellectual influence on the mental image as per §263 is there. And it takes collective effort to prove it. Individually, yes, you fooled yourself. As a social strata you lost a considerable amount of money. As government, you have unregulated market niche.
      Point is not so much of reimbursement anymore, but punishing the opportunists and making further online business interactions safer.
      Again, it's not the only case, it's a pattern. Another example, AI services that do not operate their own servers but provide webpage through which you connect to public servers.

    • @berndbrotify
      @berndbrotify 21 день тому

      @@feedbackzaloop IANAL, but I'm pretty sure it's not fraud in the sense of §263 StGB either, as they are neither faking or suppressing any information to lure you into giving them money. In fact they are even telling you that you don't have to pay them, and you could get the same service for free, if I got rewboss's video correctly.
      I'm pretty sure that if they make such much money for this scheme, they have spoken to their lawyers to make sure they bend the law without breaking it.

    • @feedbackzaloop
      @feedbackzaloop 21 день тому

      @@berndbrotify neither am I, but had experience with social engineering. And creating safe invironment in which victims do not feel obliged to pay is one of the staples. But well, that's technicalities, indeed for lawyers.
      And you reinforce another point: just the amount of money circulating (not only paying for lawyers but also keeping at top of Google search) should raise concerns.

  • @debasishraychawdhuri
    @debasishraychawdhuri 9 днів тому

    You can to fill a form to pay the Government a mandatory tax to pa for the public broadcast? Why can't they just take that tax as part of the income tax or something?

    • @rewboss
      @rewboss  9 днів тому

      Because, legally speaking, it's not a tax. Taxes cannot be raised for specific purposes, so the government can't legally collect this fee as a tax.
      Also, it applies to households and businesses, not individual people. If you live together in one apartment, you only need to pay one fee.