Which Dracula Film is Most Faithful to the Book?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 12 чер 2024
- Which Dracula movie adaptation is most faithful to the original Bram Stoker book?? I wanted a definitive answer, so I selected 12 contenders and put them up to the test. This counts theatrical and television, but no sequels, spinoffs, or spoofs.
THE CONTENDERS
1922 - Nosferatu "The silent version"
1931 - Dracula "The Lugosi version"
1931 - Dracula "The Spanish version"
1953 - Dracula in Instanbul “The Turkish version”
1958 - Dracula / Horror of Dracula "The Hammer version"
1970 - Bram Stoker's Count Dracula "The Jesus Franco version"
1973 - Bram Stoker's Dracula / Dracula "The Jack Palance version"
1977 - Count Dracula "The BBC '77 version"
1979 - Dracula "The Frank Langella version"
1979 - Nosferatu the Vampyre "The Nosferatu remake"
1992 - Bram Stoker's Dracula "Coppola's Dracula"
2006 - Dracula "The BBC '06 version”
#Dracula #Cinemassacre #JamesRolfe - Фільми й анімація
The Coppola one has many surface level details which makes it look really faithful, but Mina's affair with Dracula fundamentally changes the story.
Exactly. The Coppola Dracula is an emotional rock star. In Stoker's book he was an unfeeling monster.
I think it makes him more interesting
People love Coppolas version, but making Dracula some sort of tragic lover really ruined the whole movie for me.
Some characters don't need to be humanized, Dracula is one of them
Having seen the Coppolas Dracula count(I made a funny)less times , I was suprised when I read the book, there was no romance between Dracula and Mina. Other than that, I think it was pretty faithful.
Coppola was a huge fan of the book and made the original story infinitely better while also being deeply faithful.
We need this as a series. You could do one on Frankenstein, Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, Hunchback of Norte Dame... even non-horror books like Wizard of Oz. I see nothing but endless potential here!
Notre Dame isn't horror (I've only seen the Disney movie so)
I’d enjoy all those. All endless possibilities
@@unwelldanny7108 I mean you're very wrong but sure
For Wizard of Oz, I'd say the 1982 Japanese animated version is the most accurate version I've seen, which was kinda disappointing, it's a 1980's anime, where's all the crazy nonsensical stuff? Other than the crazy stuff already in the story.
What about a Christmas Carol, Moses, or most of the Grimm Brothers tales.
"But, but Lucy... I'm British."
"And so are THESE!"
Dracula: Dead and Loving It
My favorite part in the movie
Love that movie 😎👍🏻
Poor Jonathan Harker
Aahh children of the night.. what beautiful mess they make. Im count dra…..cula
It could be argued that Coppola's version does include Renfield begging for his freedom, because immediately after talking with Mina, he cries out to the Dr, 'Dr Jack! I'm no lunatic, I'm just a sane man fighting for his soul!'
I could listen to James talk about horror movies all day. It never gets old. His videos are so informative. I love it.
I do sometimes listen to James talk about horror all day. I'll Que up 5 or 6 monster madness playlists and put em on the big TV at work. The whole store gets bathed in Cinemassacre's glory.
Mhm, 33 minute James horror chat video? Yes, please
Yea wish he did a podcast, I can't imagine the work that went into this video
Yeah you can tell it's a passion for him
Right! I also like the fact that the way James talks about Dracula movies is almost the same as I wrote it in my book about history of horror movies. So it's like listening to a very close friend)
Would you consider doing a similar video with the Frankenstein adaptations?
And Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, Phantom of the Opera, Hunchback of Notre Dame?
That's too easy... Young Frankenstein wins every time!!!!!
The Wolf Man .
I'll almost guarantee thats coming, and I can't wait!
That would be interesting... especially since in the Universal films, plot elements from the novel were basically split between the original and Bride of Frankenstein.
Correction...In Ford Coppola's version, Jonathan writes Mina telling her he has to stay with Dracula for a month to "tutor him in English culture."
let me correct myself......'tutor him in English custom.'
Ford?
Something I feel I should mention about the Coppola version. While Dracula doesn't have a mustache as an old man when grows younger he does and Johnathan writes a letter saying that Dracula wanted to learn English customs from him.
I love this kind of content. Someone talking about a subject they're genuinely passionate and knowledgeable about. Not chasing any trend or grabbing for views. Just a horror movie nerd talking about something he wants to talk about.
I have absolutely no interest in old horror movies, but I'd gladly sit in the same spot for hours just to hear James ramble on about them. His passion is infectious.
I'm pretty much the same. James is able to actually make me interested in something I'd otherwise not give much thought. I appreciate the effort he puts into his videos.
Being a classic horror cinema nerd as well it's very interesting to me to listen to someone who shares the same views)
"The Dracula Dozen" sounds like a good action-horror movie
Sounds like a biker gang in an 80s flick
Or a rock group.
Action-Horror-Comedy
The Magnificent Seven 🤠 in Dracula 🧛♂️ form
It would be fun to know the points for the 1968 television version starring Denholm Elliott.
Dracula is NOT killed by Harker and Quincy in Coppola’s version. He is mortally wounded by them but they were only the overarching cause of his death and not the actual direct killers. It’s Mina who kills him by decapitating him with a sword to put him out of his misery.
the romantic ending, love it.
Ty sis
He's already dead when she decapitates him. She kills him when she shoves Quincy's knife further in... what a lovely conversation 😂😂😂 ☕️🍰
George Lucas recommended that to make it feel deeper
Dracula was pretty dead by that point, Lucy simply freed him from his misery.
This is honestly one of James best ever videos. The level of research and enthusiasm is fantastic.
Minor point, but when Gary Oldman portrays the younger looking version of Dracula, he has a moustache.
Old man with a moustache.
It deserves a point.
Capt'Wes Starwind but he ain’t old
@@dannyt3522 Maybe half a point.
Jake Theberge I can live with that lol
Which movie has the man hitting candles with a whip, throwing bottles of holey water, and moon walking up stairs?
Netflix's 2017 animated series comes the closest!
@@nyxshadowhawk well until season 2
I think the Coppola Dracula could take place in the Castlevania universe. The weird transformations Dracula goes through in the movie wouldn't be too out of place with the games, the idea of reincarnation and Dracula having a wife named Elisabeta who's death made him renounce God fits with Lament of Innocence, and Coppola's movie is one of the few adaptations that has Quincy Morris, who's son John Morris would go on to be a main character in Castlevania Bloodlines.
Holey water. lol I love you.
Holy*
The reason so many versions switch Lucy and Mina is probably because that's what they did in the original stage adaptation by Hamilton Deane and John Balderston. Both the Langella version and Dead and Loving It are really adapting the play rather than the novel
The 1931 Universal version was also largely adapted from the play, if I'm not mistaken. Which worked out well for Lugosi, since he had starred in it.
Thank you for mentioning the play! There are always going to be simplifications--at least in the number of locations-- when something has been adapted for the stage.
The original Dracula was written like a found footage film. I'm surprised that hasn't happened yet. Just imagine Jonathan vlogging about his travels and only being able to film vampires in night vision or only the filters pick them up. Mina and Lucy skyping together, Sewerd watching security cameras of his patients, news broadcasts, filming with phones and other devices.
That would be a train wreck... but an interesting one
i don't care if it ends up working or not, i now want to see that movie!
analog horror Dracula? :0
Only thing difficult to translate to modern times is why Harker has to go in person all the way to rural Romania for a real estate deal. But there are still very remote places in that part of the world where something could be hiding in some ruins for centuries ⚰️💀🕸
Vlad Tepes begs the differ...
Ill bet that the reason Franco’s Dracula had a moustache was on Lee’s insistence; Lee was remarkably well read and loved detail.
I saw a video recently on Christopher Lee. Fascinating guy. His real life was more interesting than the characters he has played in the movies!!
@@1845Raven His real life was more interesting than any character anyone has ever played in any movie.
You're right- in fact he only agreed to do the film if he was allowed to have the moustache
Franco got the moustache right... which is about the only thing he ever got right in his entire career as a film-maker. But I'll agree with the comments: Lee was an impressive man (had the privilege and good fortune to meet him and his wife in person, a few years before he passed away). Almost seems, that there was in event in the 20th century that he wasn't somehow part of. From having met JRR Tolkien to his efforts in WW2 or having his relative, Ian Flemming, loosely basing the character of James Bond on him... check out the execution of Eugen Weidmann on UA-cam, a serial killer and the last person to be publicly beheaded in France: there's a very young Christopher Lee standing in the audience.
@@fenriz218 That's pretty insane. I didn't know he was Fleming's step-cousin.
This was a helluva brilliant discussion, sir. Now, onto Frankenstein!
That should definately become a series...
@@makaiev Considering this single video took him roughly a half of a year to make, I don't think that will happen.
Considering no film adaptation, with the possible exception of the Kenneth Branagh one, has even come close to the actual book, there's not really much point.
Agreed
Frankenstein077 I’ve yet to sit down and give it a proper read through... But, that’s interesting to learn. Thanks for the insight.
"Netlfix, or anybody who's listening, you have an easy win here"
Netflix - Has a Dracula show
"Wait, not like that..."
Of course it’s surprising.
Also it’s surprising no one knows how many points NBC’s Dracula has.
Oh and what’s for Dracula: Prince of Darkness or Scars of Dracula though it doesn’t count?
NETFLIX: What? To redo the story? Oops, I thought you meant "to ruin the story". Excuseeeee...
Dracula is a sucker....wait...what?
I can’t believe he missed “moms got a date with a vampire”, obviously the most accurate interpretation
I love that movie lol from my childhood
The Lost Boys?
What about Mel Brooks' "Dracula; Dead and LOVING it!", starring Leslie Nielsen?
@@thisisnotachannel It one of the 3 S's. It's a spoof. Spoofs, Spinoffs and Sequels don't count
How bout 'Fright Night?' In that one the "Rindfield" equivalent character is very normal.
I was saddened to learn the 1972 classic Blackula wasn’t eligible for consideration 😐
the real one was European
onlythewise1 woooosh
@@OttoGraff-fu8pj yep wooooosh in goes the basketball two points I win
onlythewise1 I… don’t think you know what wooosh means
Two r/itswooooshwith4os
I was rooting for Coppola's version. That was the one I saw when I was a kid. Looking back, I can't believe my parents let me watch it. I was 10.
My parents let me watch the exorcist when I was 5. As well as Friday the thirteenth and nightmare on Elm street and all those other slasher and horror movies. Not saying it’s a good idea I’m pretty fucked up from it.
I taped the movie on VHS when I was in primary school - or maybe my mother taped it for me - and I always loved this movie since.
Monica Bellucci 😍
@@SatanAteMySocks Same. I was like 13. Really liked it.
Coppola version was so scary it give me nightmares
it angers me that copolla is so accurate in nearly every way but also has a love relationship with dracula and mina
I actually loved Dracula's and Mina's love story in that film. While it definitely ruined all the evilness and even fear Dracula originally created, at least it added something new to the story and I was definitely rooting for them two the most out of all the characters.
@@infjelphabasupporter8416 New to the story? Check out the Palance version.
@@richardjones4466 That spoilt the story by yet again killing off Harker at the beginning like most of the other adaptions do, when Harker should be Drac's main nemesis as per the book & any adaption faithful to it.
Idk I'd still argue he's pretty evil since it seems to be a result of hypnosis by Dracula rather than any real love.
Having watched a few more of these since last I watched this video, I'd offer that the Franco version is the one that most closely captures the VIBE of the book. Christopher Lee is incredible in it as a physically and dialogue-accurate Dracula, and the emotions between the characters are all very present. Really, the only thing it's missing is the real Quincy to complete its Fellowship of the Stake, as I like to call them.
That's one badass group name.
The Franco was my pic for most true to story... but I've never seen the BBC version. It's now on my list to see
Holy shit its like ive watched 12 movies in an half hour! So much work has been done for this 10/10 video!
I watch Dracula movies almost every week)). A couple of days I rewatched the Turkish version BTW. It's pretty good for sure)
Did you actually watch it though? I had to just listen to the audio. I couldn't handle the lipsync. It was very good to listen to though.
@Devonte Huntley When I watched it the audio and video were out of sync. it might have been you tube not the video.
Holy shit, the amount of detail you put into analyzing each film is amazing!
He is a Nerd.. well, d'oh ;D
It really is amazing how much effort he puts into his vids, unlike most channels.
6:48 The "plague" in the original Nosferatu is actually just the vampire feeding on the town. The ship enters the harbor with its crew missing or dead, the crew member whose body they examine has died a mysterious death with a wound on his neck, and they think he's died from a plague. We the audience know the vampire killed him, but the townspeople don't. Then the vampire goes on killing people in the town, but they think it's a plague killing them. The "plague" ends when the vampire dies at the end of the story, because there WAS no actual plague, it was the vampire preying on the town. He's directly responsible for all that death - there never was a plague at all.
The "plague" thread in the film didn't come from the novel, so on that you're correct. The film was made not long after the flu pandemic of the time, so it makes sense to write in the idea of a vampire killing people mysteriously being mistaken for a plague - a great idea.
The plague theme is also stressed by making the rat the vampire's signature animal. Orlok changes into a swarm of rats at one point if I remember right.
A lot of the German legends about vampires were very heavily allegorical--and definitely tied to the multiple plagues that swept Europe.
Although in the remake dracula actually does release a plague on the town
I think the Coppola version should've earned a half-point for giving Dracula a moustache *after* he de-ages.
So how many points does the Moffat miniseries get?
Ahh Moffat's Dracula, what a wonderful 2 episode re-imagination of the classic
In the novel, Bram Stoker describes Dracula with a distinct mustache.
@@kenknowlton3085 Only at the beginning. He gets a pointy beard after he de-ages.
There actually is a single line in the novel implying that Dracula is indeed Vlad the Impaler. "He must, indeed, have been that Voivode Dracula who won his name against the Turk, over the great river on the very frontier of Turkey-land."
I just read Dracula and I knew there was that reference I just couldn't remember where
The name is derived from Vlad Tepes' father Dracul though, while the inspiration vame from the son. Ironically the book itself got the name wrong.
In the book, Dracula explicitly states that he is a Szekler (Székely). The Vlad the Impaler connection originated in a book by Radu Florescu (in Search of Dracula) published in the 1970's.
@@ajoajoajoajVlad was the little dragon, Dracula. His father was the dragon, Dracul.
Apparently the reference in the book was supposed to be Vlad the Impaler. But Bram Stoker got the name wrong and the ethnicity wrong. Because he didn't know a lot about the actual history. It was a mistake.
James loves his classic horror movies , doesn't he?
Not surprising, seeing his love of Castlevania.
Frankenstein is next XD
@bbarrera86 just like I am. If there wasn't Stoker's Dracula I'd probably never became interested in horror classics)
Because the ones today sucks... no pun intended.
Great video. One thing about Coppola's version being called Bram Stoker's Dracula that people take issues with (because it takes liberties), is that he feels when he adapts a novel, that the author's name should be above the title as its their work. People might not know that, which is why I mention it.
This was a well-organized, very informative video.
WOW! The level of research is almost academic! Well done James!
Edit: stop arguing in the comments section... Fking nerds.
No research was done or needed. He's simply that big of a Dracula nerd. I bet you he knew all on this before even making the video. ANGRY DRACULA NERD! :P
@RMJ1984 You clearly don't know what the word "research" means.
By watching all the movies, James did research.
@@28Pluto He watched them for fun. When you go and watch Avengers Endgame and you WILL watch it. You aren't doing research, you are enjoying yourself.
@RMJ1984 Wow, you *are* stupid, and prove my point that you don't know what research is.
In order to successfully make this video, James did research by watching all the movies and then comparing them to the book. Of course he had fun too, but that's simply a byproduct of comparing the facts of the subject that he enjoys.
Heck, even if James ranked the movies in order of "fun he had" he still would be applying his opinion to the fact-gathering (in this case seeing how much fun they are) while watching the movies.
Example: If you eat 10 different chocolate bars, and then rank them in order of your favourites, your opinion will be based on the *research* you did by eating the 10 bars. You gathered your facts, and then made your opinion based on those facts. That''s literally what research is.
Also, I haven't watched a Marvel movie since Iron Man 2, so I won't be watching Avengers.
@@RMJ1984 He didn't know of the Turkish version.
You get a like for giving a shout-out to Dead and Loving It. I was astonished at how book-accurate it managed to be while still playing everything for laughs.
I was amazed at how bad it was a comparison to Young Frankenstein. Adding Gene Wilder to the mix really made a difference
@@darknessanddistance4469 pfft. Leslie Nielson was brilliant.
I would sooo binge watch a faithful adaptation tv series!
I'm pretty sure everyone who watched this would :)
The ‘77 BBC version is by far the best version. Available to stream on UA-cam, it has loads of class and the best actors, with a very suave and Subtle Dracula
Just laid down and watched this with my daughter. She bet on BBC 77 and won! Now I'm cleaning the kitchen on Saturday. Thanks a lot James. Great video.
I have a feeling like James brought it up casually in some other video as an example of an unusually accurate retelling, so I bet on it too.
@@handsomebrick yea my wife and I both bet the BBC '77 version would win.
I voted on Coppola's Dracula
"Then who keeps turning the lights on and off. Nosferatu" RIP hillenburg
The hash slinging slasher!!!
I didn't know he died. That's too bad.
@@Hurlebatte you don't even care
@@gleenfales ?
James got me into classic horror and now I appreciate silent/b&w movies more than modern cinema. Always loved horror but I had no idea how much more amazing the genre is and I thank James for making these videos to teach it. Great video!
The most faithful adaptation I have seen is the 1977 one starring Louis Jordan.
Dracula: Dead and Loving It scores 26 points!
And gains another 50 for him hitting his head on the chandler rising from his coffin. LOL
Creatures of the Night...what a mess they make
@@Brandon3060 I must move the coffin ... or the chandelier!
I was.... having a daymare!
Mel Brooks will always be definitive Van Helsing for me.
There is an interview with Christopher Lee he says he would have only played Dracula again if it followed the book
imagine Christopher Lee performing as Dracula with a moustache. He could have done it without being ridiculous but scary. No one else.
@@phreakazoith2237 He did! Look at the Franco one. It's a pretty bad mustache but he can make anything work at least a little.
Christopher Lee truly was a one of a kind. I really miss the guy, one of the few actors that could scare me even in his 90's! RIP Mr Lee we all miss you!
He's literally shown playing the novel accurate Dracula in the video. He was really good in that movie.
Phreak Azoith what do you mean he could have done it? He DID do it!
Actually, the book does imply the link to Vlad the Impaler, referencing his war against the Turks.
Right. I was thinking just that.
@@jessehernandez8419 yep same
Yes, it does. In a speech by Dracula to die for.
@Technicolor Vision He was mistaken about the meaning of "Dracula". Dracul means "Dragon" in Wallachian, and Vlad the II and III happened to be members of the Order of the Dragon. So, quite the coincidence if he had no idea who Prince Vlad was.
@@StedeBonnetsCravat exactly
I’d like to see a movie series that did Dracula, Frankenstein, The Phantom of the opera and so on done exactly to the books! Even if it took multiple shows/movies per book it would be awesome
The original silent Phantom starring Lon Chaney was faithful to the book.
@@stevewilkins2416 it still wasn’t to the novel though
The Coppola version DOES give Drac his moustache, just not when he's old.
I wouldn't count that, his younger self isn't much like his younger self in the novel.
Yeah, but it's definitely not the mustache in the book.
why note, james said himself if it references it or mention counts, and young drac had the mustache @@JurassicReptile
You are correct. The narrator even references the photo of Dracula with a moustache twice, when he is younger after drinking blood and when he is walking around in daylight. So add a point to Coppola.
It should be BBC '77 (58) Coppola (57)
Never mind dracula's 'tache . Nothing comes close to the magnificent upper lip fungus sported by that Turkish-Not-Renfield bloke at circa 11:07
THIS. This is the content from James that I love. I could watch stuff like this all day.
time to watch monster madness...
I would love to see James do another of these types of videos but this time going over every cinematic version of a Christmas carol, but I understand its a tall order given how many different adaptations there are. I'd say its one of the most adapted stories put to film.
I plan on doing a video similar to that in the future.
Dominic Noble more or less did a video like that.
Muppet Christmas Carol would definitely be in the top ten
I love all of this guys content, I've been watching since I was 11 with avgn and now find his opinions so interesting despite not being a huge fan nowadays for whatever reason.
Let this be remembered as the most thorough and definitive analysis on Dracula films ever done. And it managed to be entertaining as well!
This is my favorite content of Jame's. Just his own personal analysis. Not with Mike, or the screenwave guys. Just him and his opinions.
Its like the good ol days
Jame's? You can't be serious.
Yeeees
@@johnalbertson79 it was a typo, sue me
Your point is valid. The other guys detract from the quality James usually puts out. When its a group the people tend to talk over James
No doubt just less time consuming to make videos with those other jabronies.
Other than the romance subplot, the coppala version was quite close to the original book.... From Harker's escape from The Castle to how Dracula was finally taken out.
I'm sure taking Dracula out was a pain in the neck ba dum tsss
I also enjoyed your reference to the comparison of the Stoker narrative to the 'found-footage' film which is actually the best comparison to the epistolary novel I've ever heard. Maybe if someone filmed Dracula like found footage film, put together haphazardly afterwards, you could evoke the horror of Dracula without having to refer to directly to the problematic story.
There is a movie available on UA-cam called Found Footage Dracula, where they put together various videos that adapt Dracula.
@@SavouryGalette That does sound interesting! I'll put "Found Footage Dracula" into the search of UA-cam and see what it turns up. Thanks!!!
wait wdym "problematic story"? how is Dracula problematic??
It's almost over this year, but you might be interested in Dracula Daily: a substack newsletter that publishes the novel on the dates given by the journal entries.
@@evieblue959 Wonderful! I'll check it out.
For the Jack Palance Dracula, you should have nicknamed it Jackula
He does "Võne ar-r-rmed Poosh upes. Võne... T-t-tooooh... Thr-r-reeeeeyah!!!"
So the digital remaster should be called E-jackula? Ok, i'll grab my coat!
Draculance?
Castle Slickers: The Legend of Dracurly's Gold
Sound a little like _EDRACULATION_ though... ;b
It really shows when James puts so much work into his videos. Very high quality content. Thanks
Coppola's doesn't explicitly say Jonathan's trip to the castle takes place on St George's day, however it is implied by the blue flames that the coach drives through. And I would argue that the absence of Dracula's mustache when he's older is less egregious than the combination of Arthur and Quincy in the BBC version. Amazing video though, I would love to see more like it.
I started watching this just for fun, then with intense interest, then got seriously invested as the count (ha!) went on and on. I'm a huge fan of the Coppola version and think it's one of the more faithful Dracula movies, despite the liberties taken for the sake of a forbidden love story, so this was like watching a horse race and gripping my ticket tighter and tighter as the final lap was coming around, LOL! I'm pleased the BBC '77 version was the one to overtake it, though, it deserved it, but I'm proud my Coppola horse did so well. ;P
I think you could put it this way. The BBC 77 was the most faithful with the fewest deviations, while Coppola's version attempted to stay as close as possible while expanding upon the story giving more sides to the main characters of the story.
Yes, I agree.
Coppola wasn't faithful at all. Dracula was an unfeeling monster. Coppola turned him into an emotional rock star. Totally unfaithful.
Christopher Lee's Dracula is the most faithful in tone, especially the 1970 Franco film.
The bbc version needs to win just due to actually filming in Whitby. Even sat on the bench stoker wrote on.
@@lyndoncmp5751 But never in Hammer movies.
@@lyndoncmp5751 Bram Stoker should have thought of it because the original book is too dry. It's titled Dracula, meaning it would be smart to give the main character of your story some actual back story and character development.
I demand a recount!
Dracula is "old man with mustache" per book
Gary is Oldman and is rocking the 'stache
I believe the original text is "Oldman with mustache"
@@lancelemon8855 LOL
;)
YES! YOU ARE CORRECT! As a young man in London, he has a moustache! Please award another point to Copola!!!
@@cindy4u99 actually its the old incarnation in the book.
Brilliantly layed out, thank you for your intrest and diligence. Crazy to me that there are so many Dracula movies out there but none have stayed faithful to the book. Hopefully one day we'll get a faithful adaptation.
For a book that is so fantastic, I don't get the drive to differ from it in so many random ways.
I really value these videos and your detailed synopsis of such subjects.
Can you do this but with Sherlock Holmes or Frankenstein?
Funny you should mention Sherlock Holmes because Steven Moffat and Mark Gatiss are working on adapting Dracula for TV. No idea yet if it will be a close adaption or not but it's not modern day like Sherlock.
(The Granada series would win for Sherlock Holmes)
Yeah I've heard about the new Dracula adaptation. Personally I'm excited. And YES Granada would win hands down for best adaptation. Jeremy Brett is a legend.
@@tardis7395 It's elementary my dear UA-camrs, the Granada series is definitely the best of all versions and the closest. I still watch my full boxset on a fairly regular basis. Jeremy Brett was indeed truly excellent in the role, in fact, so were both Watsons and all the supporting cast.
Sherlock Holmes would be a lot harder as Doyle wrote so many stories, you'd have to focus on one narrative like 'Hound of the Baskervilles'.
15:13 I'm pretty certain Nosferatu '22 has a wolf form. To be fair, it seemed to be more of a hyena, stalking the horses at the beginning of the movie. It's then later in the movie confirmed to be Count Orlok in his "wolf form."
One thing. The Coppola version there were scenes where Dracula had a mustache including the day scenes. Just a note.
Yes, but he didn't look old when he had the mustache.
@@willieloomis5958 that's right he looked fresh as fuck haha
@@DaDoubleDee What are you an Inkling?
It would ba a half point
Jess Francos El conde Dracula is the most faithful..
Honestly I just want a full length series of James doing nerdy film rants like this.
This was just fantastic. I know I am coming late but I need James to review more vampire media, more specifically the complete Netflix Castlevania show and What We Do In The Shadows. I think he would really love them
Quincy Morris is the best character. A stalwart fighter who was down to fight evil without question.
A James only video? HECK YES! I love watching him talk about topics that he is passionate about.
I didn't know that Castlevania's character design of Dracula (grey with mustache) was the most accurate to the book. Huh.
The events of the Bram Stoker novel are also canon to the Castlevania timeline, funnily enough, as the characters’ descendants show up in Bloodlines for the Genesis and Portrait of Ruin for the DS.
It’s definitely interesting. :)
I don't think Stoker imagined Dracula being 8-ft tall though. XD
Stoker did mention that he was very tall for a normal person. I don't remember he gave an specific number but I'm always though of him being like 2m tall. Also the Castlevania wiki says Dracula is 1.93m tall (6f 4") bu i guess the artist took some liberties.
He also uses the Lugosi look in a couple of games such as Portrait Of Ruin for Nintendo DS.
The original Nosferatu does also honor the book being written in letters. Multiple of the title cards are letters. Though it may only be from Jonathan's perspective.
I watched the BBC 1977 version after an audiobook and I was not disappointed. Your video did what it said it would. Thanks
I’ve always wondered which of the Dracula movies was closest to the book since so many of the movies tend to wildly derive near the end. Thanks to James for analyzing these different versions to answer this question.
I guess they dont want to make the end predictable
Seriously? No mention of Count Chocula? This is a travesty.
haha nice
It was a parody movie, doesn't count.
No, Count Duckula is better.
Advanced Raymondology I THINK ADAM SANDLER IS GUD DRAGULA!!!
I'm sure he'll get an episode all to himself 😂 Don't worry. Count Chocula will have his day
Coppola does show the Wolves staying back or leaving because of the presence of Dracula. The presence is the command and their slow withdraw is the evidence whether by fear or command.
You deserve a like just for the sheer amount of work put into this, watching all these movies and having to know the book in detail.
The Coppola version may just be my favorite Dracula movie solely because it's the only one to include Quincy Morris. (as his own standalone character and not combined with Arthur or anything like that)
So they did my boy Morris bad in the movies too 😭
It was the best
It's not exactly the ONLY one, as there's also the 2002 Italian miniseries, as well as the Netflix version.
Honestly my quickest click for a cinemassacre upload
(Edit: despite my profile picture I am a GIGANTIC Dracula fan, as well as Frankenstein and the Wolfman.)
me too
Ditto
Jay's Son.
I'm...about... to....
Sorry... I just came.. lol
@@mikeq725 Oh, Sweet Mike.
I just love this. THANK YOU! I am not a horror film aficionado, but rather an avid reader who discovered the novel Dracula during a summer at a Bible college when I was around 20 (before you were born). I have no idea how this book got into our uptight Fundamentalist bookstore, but there it was, and I was so bored that I purchased it. I was blown away by how suspenseful and engaging it was. The movies just don't do the novel justice. Thank you for taking the time to review them and rate them. I have seen the 1931 Lugosi version and consider it as good as they could do given the time limitation. The Hammer versions are fun, but not the original Dracula novel. I was furious at Coppola's version: that he called it Bram Stoker's Dracula, and it was, as you said, Coppola's Dracula. I watched less than 30 minutes of it. Thank you for this investigation of what is out there. I agree with you that it is prime material for a mini series or TV series that would be faithful to the novel. I will try to find the BBC version that got the highest score.
30:50
Minor detail, in Coppola, Johnathan and Quincy did go for the heart and throat like in the book but it was Mina who delivered the Coup de grace
Awful adaptation. The worst dracula film
@@leargamma4912Yes,i hate that version too
My dad is a huge horror buff and would get every movie with Dracula in the title, I'm the only one who actually read the book and I was blown away by BBC 77's Count Dracula. It really captured the atmosphere of the books, and I thought Louis Jourdan really played Dracula's calm predatory nature extremely well. It's by far my personal favorite for the characters/atmosphere and because I'm just a nerd who likes to see faithful adaptations. Thanks for such an awesome video! I love nit-picky stuff like this!
I have been saying for years the 1970s BBC BBC version was the closest to the novel and, to date, I stand by that statement. Thank you for giving me proof positive.
Right on. Louis Jordan's version is the one.
As we’ve just passed the 3 year anniversary of this video, I still hold out hope we can get this treatment for Frankenstein
I can only imagine the time it took to put this all together. So cool. Thank you!
I can only begin to imagine how much work an effort was put into this video, and it definetely shows! Well done Sir, well done.
He said on Twitter that he had been working on this since last fall.
Lugosi's Dracula has the best Renfield ever. Respect Dwight Frye
Tom Wait's Renfield in Coppola's Dracula was nothing to shake a stake at.
Deaden “*dramatic gasp* Oh yes! A BIG CAT!”
HUH, HUH, HUH, HRRRRR
(best attempt at onomatopeizing his signature cackle; not very good, was it?)
Dwight Frye delivers the most insidious and demented laugh when he's found at the bottom of the stairs in the ship. For that scene alone I will never underestimate him as an actor. That said, Tom Waits' delivery of the line, "Dr. Jack, Dr. Jack! I am not an insane man; I am a sane man fighting for his soul," is one of my favourite moments in all of horror.
I agree! Best anguished, insane laugh!
I wouldn't mind seeing videos like these more often
This was really informative. Thanks for all the hard work.
I visit Whitby every year, it's a nice place, and climb those 199 steps to the Abbey.
There's also a graveyard up top with one of the graves having a skull and crossbones symbol and the stone cracked completely in half... Meant to be Dracula's grave which he rose from
Dan Curtis isnt known? Youre discussing Dracula and didnt think Curtis was known when he created Dark Shadows, a popular supernatural soap opera with a Vampire lead. Barnabas Collins.
I never read the original but listened to an audio book and was shocked to discover how incredibly awesome the book is compared to any movie.
This is true of almost any novel, sadly. The movies never get it right.
The best audio versions are the ones with a full cast as opposed to one narrator.
The Alan Cummings version is my favorite. Tim Curry’s in it too.
14:53 I love the sass he gets with Hammers version. The dry wit commentary and the research? Had to subscribe
I was unfamiliar with you before stumbling upon this and want you to know that I very enthusiastically applaud your method and presentation, but above all I commend your devotion and determination to sort this out.
Extra point for Coppola for depicting Dracula's hairy palm.
BBBC 77 has the hairy palms too.
I remember the BBC adaptation well... It was 1977, I was 8 and it scared the crap out of me. And I was a big Hammer fan back then. Seeing it now brings it all back. Thanks James for the memories. Loved that damn version
Wow! An amazing amount of effort involved in making such detailed comparisons like this! Most impressive!
Thank you for these videos, they genuinely are what make this site worth it. Speaking personally this actually helped give me motivation to read Dracula. I value art and stories and books and libraries. Thank you for this
Well done, James. I can’t imagine how many hours you put into this.
Yeah, but only the Coppola version was produced by Fred Fucks.
Yeah, the book was very adamant in it's description of it's producer, and he did appear quite a few times, if only for minor comments and plot development.
@Carlos Saraiva r/wooosh
_Help for the poor creature:_
Look up for AVGN Castlevania reviews.
Who gives a Fuch?
OH GOD! FRED FUCHS!!!
@Carlos Saraiva I like that version.
I finally managed to track down the 77 version, thanks to this video!
Appreciate the work and research that went into making this video
Someone, please PLEASE do a 20 hours long video series EXACTLY following the book! I’ve read the book and listened to readings of it at least 4 times, and I still get dazed and confused.
I freaking LOVE when James talks about classic horror, especially Dracula. So glad he keeps coming up with great new content!! He delivers so consistently, it's incredible. He's Delivers like Digorno
It's way better then the diarrhea on game cartridges.