Though the score has the Polonaise ("Boloneso") in three repeated sections, this performance treats the second and third as one repeated section. (The world premiere performance, also available on UA-cam, does the same thing. Perhaps others do too.) The two Minuets (in C major, the main key of the work) both have trios in F major. Curiously, in the second Minuet, the key signature is not changed back for the return to the opening section, identical musically! The b naturals are noted as accidentals. The concluding Allegro, though in C major, also has the key signature of F major with the b naturals noted as accidentals!
I was reading that all the pieces have recently undergone a recategorisation/organisation process and new pieces/fragments etc added to a specific/relevant appendix so I guess in effect it's a new number?
There is a new Köchel catalog. The numbers up to 626 have been not changed. For new found compositions the numbers 627 and so on are used. For them the chronology has given up.
Same composition we hear in a piece posted as a Mozart "song." Sorry, folks, this doesn't sound like Mozart to me. More likely, some academic attempting to funnel it off as actual.
Looks like the microphone was inside the cello
True
I am so happy! 🎉
I always wondered how would a cello concerto written by Mozart would sound like!❤🎻
Mozart has his comeback with this EP. We got a hit,and Mozart is gonna win the Grammy Awards.
Mozart is always so consistent yet always changing…
Tolkien and Mozart's attic chests are always full of new surprises....
Die „ganz große Cellomusik“
Can't wait for his new single to drop❤
I would be well up for further surprise discoveries 😅
Love it, love it! We love you Mozart! Thank you for this little bonus gift from the ether ❤
The 2nd Movement in particular is just too cool for school 😂
Extended version - repeats included - only on UA-cam and Spotify
New remixes to come soon (?) 😂
Though the score has the Polonaise ("Boloneso") in three repeated sections, this performance treats the second and third as one repeated section. (The world premiere performance, also available on UA-cam, does the same thing. Perhaps others do too.)
The two Minuets (in C major, the main key of the work) both have trios in F major. Curiously, in the second Minuet, the key signature is not changed back for the return to the opening section, identical musically! The b naturals are noted as accidentals. The concluding Allegro, though in C major, also has the key signature of F major with the b naturals noted as accidentals!
All right, I guess I have to play violin two
on this
Playing second violin is not as bad as some believe.
I'm noticing some errors in the score: ms 3 in V1, ms 28 in C, ms 128 in V2. Probably others, but I'm on my first hearing only.
Composed around 1760? Mozart was born 1756 - was the guy only a large toddler when composing this?
It states mod to late 60’s. Most likely a teenager.
Last piece sounds like a Scottish music.
So... who are the performers?
Vn.1 Lukas Schiller
Vn.2 David Lang
Vc. Dora Hoffelich
Whoever mixed this, screwed it! The cello is as prominent as if it was a concerto for it.
😂
The cello is the most important instrument.
Sounds like a single mic set up for a live recording. Can't really do anything with that except equalising.
@@ex_orpheus1166 its a trio not a solo
@@cardososilva51 Bass lines are as equally important as melodic lines.
Its really beautiful and melodic. Is it one of his earlier pieces?
Yes, he composed this when he was a teenager:)
@@bibicatmusic117 it seems quite simplistic, but the variations of the theme are truly modern. He really was a genius.
K 648 ? Last one (Requiem) is K 626, I don’t understand this. Any clue ?
I was reading that all the pieces have recently undergone a recategorisation/organisation process and new pieces/fragments etc added to a specific/relevant appendix so I guess in effect it's a new number?
Isn't the Koechel catalog of Mozart's works end in the number 626?
There is a new Köchel catalog. The numbers up to 626 have been not changed. For new found compositions the numbers 627 and so on are used. For them the chronology has given up.
1760? - he was four. Seems unlikely.
according to news (classic fm) it is mid to late 1760s, so could be his teenage years
@@eccuk777 That of course makes sense.
Period performances sound so wretched. I'll wait until they play this on today's strings.
@@karllieck9064 These sound like modern, synthetic cored strings to me-they lack the production noise that most gut strings have.
Pieces like this are why we don't sight read mozart's cello parts
How do you mean? I’m not a cellist, but everything seems perfectly sightreadable
@@butter5014 but boring
What is Hsl?
In Czech Violin:)
Same composition we hear in a piece posted as a Mozart "song." Sorry, folks, this doesn't sound like Mozart to me. More likely, some academic attempting to funnel it off as actual.
Why does it sound like someone beating a trashcan lid?
Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
Meh.
I only listened to the first piece - its aWful
The second movement was better.
So young and already brutally destroyed… horrible.