The worst one is in the incredibles after bob punches his boss through multiple walls they say something along the lines of "in a universe with superpowers, injuries inflicted by superpowers do not exist" when literally the next frame is the boss with all limbs broken in the hospital
CinemaWins is able to make us appreciate the hard work put into movies, even if they're internationally hated. There's so much to appreciate about that guy because he notices small details and compliments just about everything!
He does the exact same thing as cinemasins but he sounds happy so he gets a pass. He sneaks in some grade A nonsense but he's positive so it's bsd to criticise
@@bipstymcbipste5641 He is critical at some parts but I think he is also good at making sure to give people, especially the underdogs, the credit they deserve, even the smallest things are praised. CinemaSins makes statements that contradict research and sins things he likes, which is what brought us here to this comparison.
I feel like High Boi does the whole CinemaSins thing better because he’s not actually trying to look like he’s giving actual critiques while sometimes making joking or invalid ones he’s just saying what comes to mind
I remember when they sinned Bowser for acting like a villain. Bowser. The *_VILLAIN._* And when they also sinned The Super Mario Bros. Movie, for having a scene where they pull a Super Mario Bros.
@@cadendicky1855 When Mario and Luigi got their 1st real gig, their car broke down, and Mario & Luigi went through this scene that looked like a "Super Mario Bros" level, in which Cinemasins said random bull crap complaining about the fact that the scene was even happening, and sinned the scene. In a scene where Bowser was asked what to do if Peach said no to his proposal, in which Bowser angrily stated, "Then I'll power up with this star and destroy the Mushroom Kingdom!" In which Cinemasins interrupted the scene by stating, "Well, they ARE doubling down on the "If she says no, try a different thing till she says yes." Holy S**T!" Which was just stupid, of course Bowser would do that, he is a villain. And does it again in another scene where Bowsee states how he stole the star for both him and Peach, where Cinemasins states, "Doing stupid and illegal s**t, [blah blah blah]" and, yet again, sinning Bowser for being a villain.
@@someone6531 that really is a load of garbage being spewed by Cinemasins. I get that the Mario Movie isn't quite perfect, it could definitely be better, but his criticism is just so dumb and random. Cinemawins and Nostalgia Critic gave far more fair reviews of it to me.
@@cadendicky1855 My biggest gripe with Cinemasins is that most of his sin s are done because of the fact that he deems them as sinworthy instead of the scene actually truly being sinworthy. To add on, most of his sins are so incorrect and lackluster to the point where they are even incorrectly done in a lackluster way!
CinemaSins is like the kid in school that doesn't like you not because of who you are but just try to find something, anything to hate you about for attention, even if it's the smallest most trivial thing.
@@lukew6725Imagine implying that bad movies are just as bad as Hitler, jeez. Sorry but CinemaWins pointing out the good aspects of a film is nowhere near comparable to defending a monster.
It's a long time since I clicked the "don't recommend this channel"-button (or whatever it's called in english) on CinemaSins. It came to a point when I realized the exact thing that CinemaWins says "Liking things is more fun that not liking things". That is why I only watch content that I like, whether it is movies, music, video games or anything else. And I don't spend any time on the things I don't like. If I start watching a streaming show and realize I don't enjoy it, I simply stop watching it. I don't spend any time going online and complaining about it (anymore). And it's the key to true happiness. Enjoy the things you enjoy. Ignore the things you don't.
Yes, it just goes to show that sometimes even the worse people (and things) can be good for something. In this case, CinemaSins exists to show how NOT to critique film!
Someone should really make a "Everything GREAT about CinemaWins" Instead of "everything WRONG about CinemaSins" Also its kind of funny how CinemaSins is bad like what they cover and CinemaWins is good like what they cover
This is the big one. "Review" channels mimic the CinemaSins style of dissecting of film, because to them, that's what media literacy is. If you can watch a movie and complain about it, you're a movie critic!
I’ve been watching CinemaWins from pretty much the start IIRC. It scratches the same itch but in a wholesome positive way. But “roll credits” and “Prometheus school of running away from things” will always stick with me. Honestly if I were doing CinemaWins, I’d probably still do the “roll credits” joke but count it as a win.
It's been years since I watched anything from Cinemasins, but even back then I always wondered how can anyone take them seriously? I never understood what they were doing as film criticism other than on a very superficial level. I might be wrong but I also didn't have the impression thag they were serious on everything or took thenselves seriously. If they do, I am ignorant of that. I thought it was silly and exaggerated fun whether you liked the humor or not. It's really beyond me that anyone would take them seriously enough to make videos about it (not just this channel). Of course, it is possible that they have become a parody of themselves. I don't know, but I wouldn't be surprised because they were already overdoing it since I last watched.
0:56 ironically, CinemaSins could’ve pointed out a genuine problem with the filmmakers breaking the 180• rule in this sequence instead of making a comment about the lack of broken glass
My favourite cw moment was when i wrote in the script about how he had a few pages written qnd the timestamp on the film was only at 13 minutes cause it jjst hammers home that lee LOVES movies
This is a complete and utter masterpiece going over two channels in just under 4 minutes whilst you break down the money machine with no interest in quality and makes mindless jokeless slop for the pig to eat. you do highlight the good in this scenario.
I always thought cinemasins was satire its not about criticism its about being a dick and finding anything wrong even possibly wrong whereas cinemawins is finding a way to find as many positives as possible from a serious perspective cinemawins are better critics but cinemasins are always to me atleast more about mantaining a cynical dispositionate characature of a critic and now theyve almost become a parody of themselves which I think is intentional I personally still enjoy them and find them funny but if you take what they do seriously in any way I can understand people not liking them
It is satire Jeremy has always said that cinemasins is just fun to make and not really super serious alot of it is just opinion based but tbh most of his sins are pretty spot on anyways people just get offended that movies they like aren't absolutely perfect when in fact no movie is alot of movies that Jeremy likes have a big sin count because no movie is without sin
@@HedgehogEditor cinema sins appeals to that rick and morty fan type people, the ones who think they're so smart and cool when they're not, so no surprise there
You should just approach each movie honestly. Being too cool to like anything and just making edgy quibs instead of engaging with the movie is obviously obnoxious but forced positivity is also intolerable to me.
Growing & Maturing is realizing Cinema Wins is the better channel. I used to love CinemaSins when I was young & thought it was funny. Looking back now, it’s like when you reminisce about an old show you watched as a kid & then realizing it’s actually ass lmao.
CinemaWins had a huge positive impact on me when I found them. Them pointing out smaller details in a movie that show how much people cared when making it made me fall in love again with some of my most favourite movies. Through CinemaWins did I start to rewatch movies and pay attention to them. Not because I want to see what they all do wrong, but because I want to see what they all do right. He really shows how movies should be watched: As a medium to entertain and not as one that needs to make 120% sense. This is also why I seriously hate people who complain about plot holes in movies... Like, does it hurt the movie at all? Do we really need Quiet Place showing the family live in the forest at the waterfall? Do we really need to see Bruce getting back to Gotham in Dark knight rises? No...
Whoever said CinemaSins is a legit movie critic service? It is a humorous format to judge movies, it is closer to a parody than I don't know 'Siskel and Ebert'!
cinemasins when the flaws of a character creates conflict that drives the plot (why son't they just act like algorithmically derived perfect humans) cinemasins when they wonder something about a movie (they're immediately going to sin it, even if the movie immediately answers their question within 5 seconds, they're just going to cut it out)
Cinemasins: here we have the movie logo cliche, next over here we have the main character cliche, after this we have the characters talking cliche, after this terrible mess, we have backround characters cliche, finally, we have the ending of a movie cliche
CinemaWins also sucks kek, & in some ways, even worse than CinemaSins. The only thing worse than overhating on something (admittedly satirically), is legitimate toxic positivity to the point of shilling something.
I think the reason cinemasins is so bad is because they want to push for lomger videos so i think they should do a rebrand where they akmowledge the good and the bad a good would give a positive point a bad would give minus that way he can make longer videos without reaching
Okay so gonna leave this here for the people in the back. Cinemasins is shit. Nothing they do has any merit and all of their videos are them either ignoring, over looking, or out right dismissing everything they see and say "this movie doesnt explain anything" but when they do its "too...much...exposition." theyre not satire theyre only saying they are so they can avoide people legitimately criticizing them for miss information and poorly portraying movies. I can name serveral times hes ignored what a movie says and pretends its saying something else. Like when he "sined" Friday. Everything from start to finish is him making bad or tone deaf "jokes" and completely miss representing the movie to the point if someone watches gis video but never saw the movie theyd think the movie is vastly different that it actually is and thats not okay just imagine someone bashes a movie you like because they saw a cinemasins video about the movie but never watched it if you would be okay with that congrats youre part of the problem. If you watch a movie or show and decide you dont like it cool but if you see shit like cinemasins it can give you the wrong idea of what a movie is about and it wouldnt occur to you to see if its true because this reviewer said the movie sucked so it must suck. Its just mind boggling that their channel has lasted as long as it has with how they work. If you dont know youll never believe anyone else so look into cinemasins and see for your self how he is
@nyctomint wtf are you on about bro he's making a fair point cinemawins fucks up all the time and is heavily opinionated but they get a pass it's the same format alot of the time there pretty Overly generous to absolutely horrible movies anyways just like cinemasins can be to harsh on good films
Calm down dude. He literally calls out how hes bullshitting the entire time. I mean hes called cinema sins. People wacth him not to get angry but to make fun of movies cuz its fun
It isn't satire though, Jeremy himself said in a video that the entire reason he made the channel is actual criticism. Then when someone pointed that out he nuked it from the channel he uploaded it on
@@goddesscarolyn19 And maybe hes changed the direction since? You ever consider the fact he realized there more value in him being an entertaining hater than being a good critic. I can find a good critic anywhere amongst the clones of film youtube channels out there. Theres channel that goes out there with the sole purpose of bashing movies to bash movies, and its entertaining to many as much as u may dislike it.
It really feels like you missed the point and are taking a bit of (admittedly lazy) satire personally as it was directed against a movie you love. Some people enjoy a good nitpick without actually hating the thing they are nitpicking. The score and verdict at the end is meaningless. You can't actually think his score of a million sins for some movies means literally a million flaws - that would be more than the number of frames in any movie. CinemaWins isn't doing any great work of film criticism, it's literally just the opposite. Instead of satire, their modus operandi is to be a cheerleader for every movie, even the bad ones. I'd also like to say the best take down of CinemaSins as a film critic is by CinemaSins themselves: ua-cam.com/video/qvkZ8sCd5EI/v-deo.html
Do film elitists just not understand that people are capable of not watning a in depth film analysis that's been rehashed over a thousand times by the thousands of film critic channels out there. Do they ever consider, hey this guy is just finding stupid ways to hate on a movie simply for the sake of hating, that's entertaining to some people? Their entire brand going out of their way to hate on as many things as possible regardless how stupid it may seem. And its clearly funny and entertaining because people watch it. Do people ever not stop to wonder the slop they hate is a good meal to others. Do they not stop to wonder than maybe the nice meal they like, is what others would call slop. Do they once stop to consider the fact, different people like different content and not everything has to be catered to them. Do they ever stop to consider not everyone wants to become some grand intellectual about films, and sometimes just wanna digest the most surface level things about films. No, because they are elitists, the biggest gift and curse to any community. They push the boundaries of how you can enjoy films, yet they shun and isolate themselves in their own tiny bubble, scared of the outside world, which just doesn't wanna view the world in the same way as them. I just wanna clarify this, I got no problem if you wanna enjoy something past the surface level, but just understand not everyone wants to do that and acting like the greater analysis of films is the only way to enjoy the medium on youtube isn't the only type of content that needs to exist here. Let the dickhead film sinners hate. Its funny, people laugh, u don't need to like it. People hate to hate, and people like to see that. As simple as that.
😂😂 "ye im gonna draw you as a virgin while i draw myself or someone else as a chad" brudda is digging for gold im gonna be honest and say it really isnt that deep cinemawins is litterally inspired by cinemasins this whole video just seems petty or a huge glaze vest for cw
They're just two different sides of the same braindead line of thought where they absolutely must praise/ridicule the movie regardless of how good it actually is. They're both clowns.
You seem to have made an error and confused CinemaSins and CinemaWins. The first provides decent criticism: the second gives us what feels like 3 fucking hours on the supposed quality of an overlong opening sequence. W Jeremy.
This feels more of a hate piece rather then actually proving something. Which I feel is kinda ironic since that’s sorta what your bashing cinimasins for being, you provide one example to back up your claim, everything else is just an opinion. And your one example you do use I would say is easily defendable. The only thing we have to go on is the shot the directors made. And the shot they went with showed no doors/windows open. we could assume it’s a different window off screen but as it cuts away from him throwing before release, all we have to go on is what is shown. And what’s shown is closed windows. You don’t really counter anything by proving there is an open window we saw earlier or anything so it feels more like your complaining that they found a flaw in a movie you like. Also unless that open window/door is quite a distance away, that arc for the ball thing is not far enough for how much of a wind up that dude had. It should be going much farther out much faster. It sort just drops like someone gently threw it just out of frame from the camera. I don’t disagree with you, cinemasins is a garbage channel. But your evidence is literally just you making claims about your own opinion but not really backing them up. The one thing I do think you’re correct on is the logos at the beginning. I do find that to be dumb but outside that and the glass scene there isn’t really any attempt to back your claim with anything but your opinions.
Cinemawins is just as shit as sins, if not worse. Let's not pretend like he actually has the ability to comprehensively praise a movie outside of "wow pretty colours! This actor is good! Hahaha the sound design!"
It's been years since I watched anything from Cinemasins, but even back then I always wondered how can anyone take them seriously? I never understood what they were doing as film criticism other than on a very superficial level. I might be wrong but I also didn't have the impression thag they were serious on everything or took thenselves seriously. If they do, I am ignorant of that. I thought it was silly and exaggerated fun whether you liked the humor or not. It's really beyond me that anyone would take them seriously enough to make videos about it (not just this channel). Of course, it is possible that they have become a parody of themselves. I don't know, but I wouldn't be surprised because they were already overdoing it since I last watched.
That's because they are not film critics. It's an entertainment channel that performs satirical nitpicking of movies. Nitpicking can be fun if you realize it is not done seriously.
The Master turned and said: _"Ls make Ls of Ws, Ws make Ws of Ls"_
The worst one is in the incredibles after bob punches his boss through multiple walls they say something along the lines of "in a universe with superpowers, injuries inflicted by superpowers do not exist" when literally the next frame is the boss with all limbs broken in the hospital
That is easily the most obvious example of what they do
To be fair the boss should be dead after that, but yeah it's not like he just gets up and is perfectly fine...
no the worst one is saying the inside out headquarters look like the cn tower and giving it a sin
That's about half of their sins is to either purposefully misunderstand or entirely cut out scenes just to nitpick films.
CinemaWins is able to make us appreciate the hard work put into movies, even if they're internationally hated. There's so much to appreciate about that guy because he notices small details and compliments just about everything!
You get it
He does the exact same thing as cinemasins but he sounds happy so he gets a pass. He sneaks in some grade A nonsense but he's positive so it's bsd to criticise
@@bipstymcbipste5641 He is critical at some parts but I think he is also good at making sure to give people, especially the underdogs, the credit they deserve, even the smallest things are praised. CinemaSins makes statements that contradict research and sins things he likes, which is what brought us here to this comparison.
I feel like High Boi does the whole CinemaSins thing better because he’s not actually trying to look like he’s giving actual critiques while sometimes making joking or invalid ones he’s just saying what comes to mind
High Boi's pretty good!
High Boi is so chaotic and waay funnier. The dude has some suspicious political takes at times but they're probably ironic
I remember when they sinned Bowser for acting like a villain. Bowser. The *_VILLAIN._* And when they also sinned The Super Mario Bros. Movie, for having a scene where they pull a Super Mario Bros.
Yeah, neither of those made sense. What does it mean to "pull a super Mario Bros." in this context by the way?
@@cadendicky1855 When Mario and Luigi got their 1st real gig, their car broke down, and Mario & Luigi went through this scene that looked like a "Super Mario Bros" level, in which Cinemasins said random bull crap complaining about the fact that the scene was even happening, and sinned the scene.
In a scene where Bowser was asked what to do if Peach said no to his proposal, in which Bowser angrily stated, "Then I'll power up with this star and destroy the Mushroom Kingdom!" In which Cinemasins interrupted the scene by stating, "Well, they ARE doubling down on the "If she says no, try a different thing till she says yes." Holy S**T!" Which was just stupid, of course Bowser would do that, he is a villain. And does it again in another scene where Bowsee states how he stole the star for both him and Peach, where Cinemasins states, "Doing stupid and illegal s**t, [blah blah blah]" and, yet again, sinning Bowser for being a villain.
@@someone6531 that really is a load of garbage being spewed by Cinemasins. I get that the Mario Movie isn't quite perfect, it could definitely be better, but his criticism is just so dumb and random. Cinemawins and Nostalgia Critic gave far more fair reviews of it to me.
@@cadendicky1855 My biggest gripe with Cinemasins is that most of his sin s are done because of the fact that he deems them as sinworthy instead of the scene actually truly being sinworthy. To add on, most of his sins are so incorrect and lackluster to the point where they are even incorrectly done in a lackluster way!
CinemaSins is like the kid in school that doesn't like you not because of who you are but just try to find something, anything to hate you about for attention, even if it's the smallest most trivial thing.
And CinemaWins is like Kanye finding things to love about Hitler. 😆
@@lukew6725Imagine implying that bad movies are just as bad as Hitler, jeez. Sorry but CinemaWins pointing out the good aspects of a film is nowhere near comparable to defending a monster.
It's a long time since I clicked the "don't recommend this channel"-button (or whatever it's called in english) on CinemaSins.
It came to a point when I realized the exact thing that CinemaWins says "Liking things is more fun that not liking things". That is why I only watch content that I like, whether it is movies, music, video games or anything else. And I don't spend any time on the things I don't like. If I start watching a streaming show and realize I don't enjoy it, I simply stop watching it. I don't spend any time going online and complaining about it (anymore).
And it's the key to true happiness. Enjoy the things you enjoy. Ignore the things you don't.
I hope Lee sees this!
Well CinemaSins had at least inspired CinemaWins (even CinemaWins acknowledged being influenced by CinemaSins).
Yes, it just goes to show that sometimes even the worse people (and things) can be good for something. In this case, CinemaSins exists to show how NOT to critique film!
I was wondering which way round it was.
*And yet CW does CS job better than them... Let that sink in*
Cinema Wins is obviously a retort to Cinema Sins overly negative videos hiding behind "satire"
bro is full of joy and whimsy ?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
Someone should really make a "Everything GREAT about CinemaWins" Instead of "everything WRONG about CinemaSins" Also its kind of funny how CinemaSins is bad like what they cover and CinemaWins is good like what they cover
The Cinemasins Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for internet discourse.
This is the big one. "Review" channels mimic the CinemaSins style of dissecting of film, because to them, that's what media literacy is. If you can watch a movie and complain about it, you're a movie critic!
I’ve been watching CinemaWins from pretty much the start IIRC. It scratches the same itch but in a wholesome positive way.
But “roll credits” and “Prometheus school of running away from things” will always stick with me. Honestly if I were doing CinemaWins, I’d probably still do the “roll credits” joke but count it as a win.
"We're not reviewers. We're assholes."
-CinemaSins Jun 7, 2013
It's been years since I watched anything from Cinemasins, but even back then I always wondered how can anyone take them seriously? I never understood what they were doing as film criticism other than on a very superficial level. I might be wrong but I also didn't have the impression thag they were serious on everything or took thenselves seriously. If they do, I am ignorant of that. I thought it was silly and exaggerated fun whether you liked the humor or not. It's really beyond me that anyone would take them seriously enough to make videos about it (not just this channel). Of course, it is possible that they have become a parody of themselves. I don't know, but I wouldn't be surprised because they were already overdoing it since I last watched.
0:56 ironically, CinemaSins could’ve pointed out a genuine problem with the filmmakers breaking the 180• rule in this sequence instead of making a comment about the lack of broken glass
SO TRUE!!! I’ve been waiting for someone to say this
My favourite cw moment was when i wrote in the script about how he had a few pages written qnd the timestamp on the film was only at 13 minutes cause it jjst hammers home that lee LOVES movies
This is a complete and utter masterpiece going over two channels in just under 4 minutes whilst you break down the money machine with no interest in quality and makes mindless jokeless slop for the pig to eat. you do highlight the good in this scenario.
Rock bottom is when "saying something wrong without a hint of irony" is the equivalent of humor
I always thought cinemasins was satire its not about criticism its about being a dick and finding anything wrong even possibly wrong whereas cinemawins is finding a way to find as many positives as possible from a serious perspective cinemawins are better critics but cinemasins are always to me atleast more about mantaining a cynical dispositionate characature of a critic and now theyve almost become a parody of themselves which I think is intentional I personally still enjoy them and find them funny but if you take what they do seriously in any way I can understand people not liking them
It is satire Jeremy has always said that cinemasins is just fun to make and not really super serious alot of it is just opinion based but tbh most of his sins are pretty spot on anyways people just get offended that movies they like aren't absolutely perfect when in fact no movie is alot of movies that Jeremy likes have a big sin count because no movie is without sin
You guys at least know what you are talking about, unlike the guy on the video who is clearly biased
So do you just like watching someone be a dick
cinemawins also has a wife
And a kid! He's clearly a happy person. Jeremy CinemaSins, last I checked, was still trying to get a girlfriend.
@@HedgehogEditor cinema sins appeals to that rick and morty fan type people, the ones who think they're so smart and cool when they're not, so no surprise there
One keeps crying over his college girlfriend
The other expresses gratitude towards his wife
Choose wisely.
Cinema sins be like: this movie is uncreative because it spams the trope of filled people talking to each other in order produce a story. 50000 sins.
I recommend you the channel Th3Birdman. He nitpicks CinemaSins all the time in his series called "Eww CinemaSins".
You should just approach each movie honestly. Being too cool to like anything and just making edgy quibs instead of engaging with the movie is obviously obnoxious but forced positivity is also intolerable to me.
Growing & Maturing is realizing Cinema Wins is the better channel. I used to love CinemaSins when I was young & thought it was funny. Looking back now, it’s like when you reminisce about an old show you watched as a kid & then realizing it’s actually ass lmao.
CinemaWins had a huge positive impact on me when I found them. Them pointing out smaller details in a movie that show how much people cared when making it made me fall in love again with some of my most favourite movies.
Through CinemaWins did I start to rewatch movies and pay attention to them. Not because I want to see what they all do wrong, but because I want to see what they all do right. He really shows how movies should be watched: As a medium to entertain and not as one that needs to make 120% sense.
This is also why I seriously hate people who complain about plot holes in movies... Like, does it hurt the movie at all? Do we really need Quiet Place showing the family live in the forest at the waterfall? Do we really need to see Bruce getting back to Gotham in Dark knight rises? No...
I love Lee's Chanel
you deserve more subs and also teach me how to make video essays (second half of this sentence is /j not /srs)
CinemaWins is an amazing UA-camr and a gigantic chad in general. W human
cinemawins has a whole ass family btw
Based
Whoever said CinemaSins is a legit movie critic service? It is a humorous format to judge movies, it is closer to a parody than I don't know 'Siskel and Ebert'!
cinemasins when the flaws of a character creates conflict that drives the plot (why son't they just act like algorithmically derived perfect humans)
cinemasins when they wonder something about a movie (they're immediately going to sin it, even if the movie immediately answers their question within 5 seconds, they're just going to cut it out)
Just wanna point out that it kinda looks like (probably is) CinemaWins spends more times on their videos than CinemaSins. Just a neat lil' thing.
Cinemasins: here we have the movie logo cliche, next over here we have the main character cliche, after this we have the characters talking cliche, after this terrible mess, we have backround characters cliche, finally, we have the ending of a movie cliche
I'd be interesting to see something like CinemaSins where the person narrating actually cares and points out genuine problems.
high boi is decent he does like 10 minute narrations of random shit he just watched and just says what comes to mind
Cinemasins act like their opinions about movies are facts
CinemaWins also sucks kek, & in some ways, even worse than CinemaSins. The only thing worse than overhating on something (admittedly satirically), is legitimate toxic positivity to the point of shilling something.
tbh i thought they were the same person until right now because i havent watched cinemasins in like 5 years?
I think the reason cinemasins is so bad is because they want to push for lomger videos so i think they should do a rebrand where they akmowledge the good and the bad a good would give a positive point a bad would give minus that way he can make longer videos without reaching
Okay so gonna leave this here for the people in the back. Cinemasins is shit. Nothing they do has any merit and all of their videos are them either ignoring, over looking, or out right dismissing everything they see and say "this movie doesnt explain anything" but when they do its "too...much...exposition." theyre not satire theyre only saying they are so they can avoide people legitimately criticizing them for miss information and poorly portraying movies. I can name serveral times hes ignored what a movie says and pretends its saying something else. Like when he "sined" Friday. Everything from start to finish is him making bad or tone deaf "jokes" and completely miss representing the movie to the point if someone watches gis video but never saw the movie theyd think the movie is vastly different that it actually is and thats not okay just imagine someone bashes a movie you like because they saw a cinemasins video about the movie but never watched it if you would be okay with that congrats youre part of the problem. If you watch a movie or show and decide you dont like it cool but if you see shit like cinemasins it can give you the wrong idea of what a movie is about and it wouldnt occur to you to see if its true because this reviewer said the movie sucked so it must suck. Its just mind boggling that their channel has lasted as long as it has with how they work. If you dont know youll never believe anyone else so look into cinemasins and see for your self how he is
Lol Cinemawins is literally just Cinamasins it's strange how they get s trange defense
and then the wise man sat down and said "you buffoon. you idiot. there are literally no differences between good things and bad things"
@nyctomint wtf are you on about bro he's making a fair point cinemawins fucks up all the time and is heavily opinionated but they get a pass it's the same format alot of the time there pretty Overly generous to absolutely horrible movies anyways just like cinemasins can be to harsh on good films
Because at the end of the day being hapi > being angy
Cinemawins fell off hard honestly can't stand it anymore. Still on Cinemasins even though it isn't as good as it was. Cinemawins has no actual takes.
Calm down dude. He literally calls out how hes bullshitting the entire time. I mean hes called cinema sins. People wacth him not to get angry but to make fun of movies cuz its fun
Film community doesn't understand sarcasm.
@@level1865 ong
It isn't satire though, Jeremy himself said in a video that the entire reason he made the channel is actual criticism. Then when someone pointed that out he nuked it from the channel he uploaded it on
@@goddesscarolyn19 And maybe hes changed the direction since? You ever consider the fact he realized there more value in him being an entertaining hater than being a good critic. I can find a good critic anywhere amongst the clones of film youtube channels out there. Theres channel that goes out there with the sole purpose of bashing movies to bash movies, and its entertaining to many as much as u may dislike it.
Your comment sucks, it's dumb and stupid.
Don't worry I am not critiquing, i am entertaining people and making fun of it because it's fun.
It really feels like you missed the point and are taking a bit of (admittedly lazy) satire personally as it was directed against a movie you love. Some people enjoy a good nitpick without actually hating the thing they are nitpicking.
The score and verdict at the end is meaningless. You can't actually think his score of a million sins for some movies means literally a million flaws - that would be more than the number of frames in any movie.
CinemaWins isn't doing any great work of film criticism, it's literally just the opposite. Instead of satire, their modus operandi is to be a cheerleader for every movie, even the bad ones.
I'd also like to say the best take down of CinemaSins as a film critic is by CinemaSins themselves: ua-cam.com/video/qvkZ8sCd5EI/v-deo.html
Do film elitists just not understand that people are capable of not watning a in depth film analysis that's been rehashed over a thousand times by the thousands of film critic channels out there. Do they ever consider, hey this guy is just finding stupid ways to hate on a movie simply for the sake of hating, that's entertaining to some people? Their entire brand going out of their way to hate on as many things as possible regardless how stupid it may seem. And its clearly funny and entertaining because people watch it. Do people ever not stop to wonder the slop they hate is a good meal to others. Do they not stop to wonder than maybe the nice meal they like, is what others would call slop. Do they once stop to consider the fact, different people like different content and not everything has to be catered to them. Do they ever stop to consider not everyone wants to become some grand intellectual about films, and sometimes just wanna digest the most surface level things about films.
No, because they are elitists, the biggest gift and curse to any community. They push the boundaries of how you can enjoy films, yet they shun and isolate themselves in their own tiny bubble, scared of the outside world, which just doesn't wanna view the world in the same way as them.
I just wanna clarify this, I got no problem if you wanna enjoy something past the surface level, but just understand not everyone wants to do that and acting like the greater analysis of films is the only way to enjoy the medium on youtube isn't the only type of content that needs to exist here. Let the dickhead film sinners hate. Its funny, people laugh, u don't need to like it. People hate to hate, and people like to see that. As simple as that.
😂😂 "ye im gonna draw you as a virgin while i draw myself or someone else as a chad" brudda is digging for gold im gonna be honest and say it really isnt that deep cinemawins is litterally inspired by cinemasins this whole video just seems petty or a huge glaze vest for cw
Cinemasins on top
On top of what? The "top 10 worst UA-cam channels list"?
📠
They're just two different sides of the same braindead line of thought where they absolutely must praise/ridicule the movie regardless of how good it actually is. They're both clowns.
Says a guy who copies their format and makes money off of seems disingenuous.
i like cinema sins🤷♀️, its not film critism
It's not-- but Jeremy Scott says it is. And many of his fans think it is. And that's factually wrong.
then what is it?
You seem to have made an error and confused CinemaSins and CinemaWins. The first provides decent criticism: the second gives us what feels like 3 fucking hours on the supposed quality of an overlong opening sequence. W Jeremy.
Bait used to be believable
"decent criticism" the troll says
This feels more of a hate piece rather then actually proving something. Which I feel is kinda ironic since that’s sorta what your bashing cinimasins for being, you provide one example to back up your claim, everything else is just an opinion.
And your one example you do use I would say is easily defendable. The only thing we have to go on is the shot the directors made. And the shot they went with showed no doors/windows open.
we could assume it’s a different window off screen but as it cuts away from him throwing before release, all we have to go on is what is shown. And what’s shown is closed windows.
You don’t really counter anything by proving there is an open window we saw earlier or anything so it feels more like your complaining that they found a flaw in a movie you like.
Also unless that open window/door is quite a distance away, that arc for the ball thing is not far enough for how much of a wind up that dude had. It should be going much farther out much faster. It sort just drops like someone gently threw it just out of frame from the camera.
I don’t disagree with you, cinemasins is a garbage channel. But your evidence is literally just you making claims about your own opinion but not really backing them up.
The one thing I do think you’re correct on is the logos at the beginning. I do find that to be dumb but outside that and the glass scene there isn’t really any attempt to back your claim with anything but your opinions.
Bro's scrutinising me
@@maxmunichscrutinizing*
And to your take yes. That was in fact what my comment was doing lol
@@trentwise3762 scrutinise is a valid spelling
@@radgoodcoffee that’s not what he said though.
Scrutinising is not proper spelling
@@trentwise3762 its a different valid way of spelling the word in the way criticise emphasise flavour colour and other words are
Moment of silence to everyone who takes CinemaSins seriously...
Cinemawins is just as shit as sins, if not worse. Let's not pretend like he actually has the ability to comprehensively praise a movie outside of "wow pretty colours! This actor is good! Hahaha the sound design!"
Found CinemaSins’s alt
@@SharkJnr cinemasins is also fucking shite, get over yourself
Cinemawins does ANALYSIS. That's a major leap over anything Cinemasins does. Get over yourself.
L
yes but he sounds like he gves a shit
Cinemawins is so much worse he calls everything a win and is so positive
It's been years since I watched anything from Cinemasins, but even back then I always wondered how can anyone take them seriously? I never understood what they were doing as film criticism other than on a very superficial level. I might be wrong but I also didn't have the impression thag they were serious on everything or took thenselves seriously. If they do, I am ignorant of that. I thought it was silly and exaggerated fun whether you liked the humor or not. It's really beyond me that anyone would take them seriously enough to make videos about it (not just this channel). Of course, it is possible that they have become a parody of themselves. I don't know, but I wouldn't be surprised because they were already overdoing it since I last watched.
That's because they are not film critics. It's an entertainment channel that performs satirical nitpicking of movies. Nitpicking can be fun if you realize it is not done seriously.