Does The Prestige Duplication Machine Actually Duplicate Anything?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 сер 2024
  • Oh, boy... a film school grad has a fan-theory about a Chris Nolan film!
    Supernatural by Kevin MacLeod
    Link: incompetech.fi...
    License: creativecommons...
    Special Thanks to my Patreon Producers: Richard Ashmore, Laura B, Jason Blodgett, Jason Alexander Herrera, Sunil, and Raul Villalobos!
    Check out my independent film "Second Service" on UA-cam: • SECOND SERVICE - Featu...
    Twitter: / coldcrashpics
    Instagram: / coldcrashpictures
    Patreon: / coldcrashpictures
    Tumblr: / coldcrashpictures
    Amazon wishlist: www.amazon.com...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 612

  • @claudiarcade
    @claudiarcade 4 роки тому +818

    the real duplication machine was the friends we killed along the way

    • @coldcrashpictures
      @coldcrashpictures  4 роки тому +69

      HAHAHAHAhahahahHahHAAhhaha

    • @tatehildyard5332
      @tatehildyard5332 4 роки тому +20

      It’s nice to see a Nolan analysis with an interesting angle to it. And that thumbnail is great. I’ve always described this movie as 2 magicians measuring and wagging their dicks and ruining lives along the way.

    • @noeloumard9106
      @noeloumard9106 4 роки тому +6

      Thank you dear stranger, that honestly just made my day a lot better than it was before :)

    • @claudiarcade
      @claudiarcade 4 роки тому +3

      @@noeloumard9106 no worries mate!

    • @alephmorricone7207
      @alephmorricone7207 4 роки тому

      explain this comment plz

  • @belagrolaub8746
    @belagrolaub8746 4 роки тому +308

    This movie made me BELIEVE they had ACTUALLY CAST a Hugh Jackman look alike.

    • @coldcrashpictures
      @coldcrashpictures  4 роки тому +123

      When I read that they gave him false teeth to play Root it was like an existential weight was lifted off my shoulders. I could SWEAR they weren’t identical while I was watching, but I was never in a million years gonna guess what was different.

    • @belagrolaub8746
      @belagrolaub8746 4 роки тому +34

      @@coldcrashpictures YEEEEEEEES, holy shit, I was CERTAIN while watching that they were two actors. Maybe that's also a honor medal kinda for Hugh Jackman's acting abilities LOL. I don't even remember when I realized exactly it was Hugh in a double feature all the time, I guess I read the credits properly some day.

    • @pembo8322
      @pembo8322 4 роки тому +6

      coldcrashpictures pssst his nose is different too

    • @ty-zz9ic
      @ty-zz9ic Рік тому

      @@coldcrashpictures His nose, ears and teeth were

    • @jameshershberger8085
      @jameshershberger8085 Рік тому +1

      They should’ve, in my opinion that’s the main flaw of the film

  • @jakehorsburgh2878
    @jakehorsburgh2878 4 роки тому +344

    I literally just realised Borden was killed by falling through a trap door...

    • @xt355
      @xt355 4 роки тому +5

      which trap door?

    • @AlexSmith-gr3el
      @AlexSmith-gr3el 4 роки тому +47

      @@xt355 the hangman's trapdoor when he was executed for Angier's murder

    • @yarone84
      @yarone84 4 роки тому +14

      This means one thing...the duplicate machine is duplicating. Why then Angier would make kill Borden in a trap door...to kill him as he usually would kill his clones!

    • @danarud3471
      @danarud3471 3 роки тому

      @@yarone84 or hb that fact that we see the machine.. work🤦🏻‍♂️ 😂

    • @alanmacdonald1457
      @alanmacdonald1457 6 місяців тому

      only in a description given by angier, doesnt mean it happened @@danarud3471

  • @magzdilluh
    @magzdilluh 4 роки тому +548

    the real Hugh Jackmans were the Hugh Jackmans we made along the way

    • @bigdaddydons6241
      @bigdaddydons6241 3 роки тому +8

      The real Hugh was the Jackman we made along the way

    • @ssssSTopmotion
      @ssssSTopmotion 3 роки тому +15

      @@bigdaddydons6241 the real Hugh was the man we jacked along the way

    • @imgeorgelucas320
      @imgeorgelucas320 3 роки тому +1

      wolverine was a clone

    • @InvaderTak176
      @InvaderTak176 3 роки тому

      The real high Jackman was the one in the tank all along

    • @LloydWaldo
      @LloydWaldo 2 роки тому +1

      The real references were the realities we referenced along the way.

  • @crudboy12
    @crudboy12 4 роки тому +535

    (Spoiler warning) While it is certainly an interesting theory, I feel like the film doesn't support it thematically. The thematic notion of the secret being disappointing compared to the trick itself is certainly present in the film, but the film doesn't stop at disappointing; it goes out of it's way to show that the secret sometimes involves sacrifices. The birdcage trick that shows up multiple times throughout the beginning of the film is analogous to the final transported man: in both tricks the original must be destroyed to give the illusion that it has been transported. The theme of sacrifices is also present in Alfred Borden's marriage and life in which he must allow his brother to replace him some times in order to maintain the secret about how his trick is done, destroying his marriage and driving his wife to hang herself. His brother must sacrifice his fingers to replicate the injury caused by Angier shooting him. To one up Borden, Angier must also make sacrifices. First he is forced to sacrifice being in the spotlight for his transported man trick, which bothers him greatly. He still isn't satisfied, so he convinces himself that he must do it better regardless of the cost. Consider the conversation between Angier and Tesla where Tesla asks Angier if he has considered the cost of the duplicator machine. Angier tells Tesla that price is not an object, and Tesla replies "Yes, but have you considered the cost?" This line alone is enough to put this theory to bed as far as I am concerned. The greatest magic trick must involve the greatest sacrifice.
    If the final trick was just a better done version of Angier's previous transported man, it would not continue the theme of escalating cost that is present throughout the film. Angier would also never go back to Root for his final trick. Angier doesn't want to get rid of Borden, he wants to beat Borden's Transported Man, and then get rid of him after he has won. Angier is convinced utterly until the very end that Borden is not using a double so he would never be able to feel like he beat Borden by using a double himself. That's why he was never satisfied with his act involving Root, even though it was better than Borden's Transported Man already. Prestige is a film about obsession, not just about rivalry. Angier is obsessed. His character arc is all about the sacrifices made for blind obsession. Deciding to kill himself every night over and over again to one up a rival is the ultimate expression of this.

    • @JohannesLilover
      @JohannesLilover 4 роки тому +18

      Yeah

    • @kobaltkween
      @kobaltkween 4 роки тому +24

      So basically, it's weak either way. Either the cost escalates, and it stops being about who is fooled and why with a really brute force variation (going from one double to hundreds that are killed each time just isn't a big shift), _or_ it's a brilliant trick with costs that are basically one random showboaty guy (Rook) and one a-hole who ruined people's lives just so there wouldn't be one or two more people who knew the secret to his trick. As a viewer, I feel worse about the birds.
      Also, I'd say the arc you present is interesting, while the other arc is really boring. It reduces the whole movie to more and more elaborate dick measuring with the same damn measuring tape. Which I guess was always my problem with the movie. The only character I found interesting and appealing was Tesla. And that was probably because I knew enough about his bizarre and tragic life to know why he ended up in the middle of nowhere, flinging lightning through sky on a mountain above a small town that feared and hated him as a real life mad scientist in love with a pigeon (I kid you not). Everyone else seemed to be a tiresome, egotistical, privileged idiot with uninteresting goals, characterization, and background.
      Tesla vs. Edison, now that was the _real_ destructive rivalry.

    • @frosted3
      @frosted3 4 роки тому +13

      @@kobaltkween There was never real beef between Tesla and Edison, it's a false narrative that's been pushed by unscrupulous publishers for 100 years straight and it's only remained within the cultural consciousness for this long bc everyone loves a good underdog story. The truth is somewhat fittingly just as disappointingly mundane.

    • @sallylee4924
      @sallylee4924 4 роки тому +1

      That was my take away as well.

    • @kobaltkween
      @kobaltkween 4 роки тому +20

      @@frosted3 Um, I've read quite a few historical documents that say otherwise. And actually watched the film of the completely unnecessary electrocution of that elephant. And read a fair amount about Edison and his unscrupulous business practices in general. Just by himself, he wasn't anywhere near mundane, and Tesla was even more extreme. I think you need to do more research, and actually look at original documents. Like the account of Tesla with his arcing electrical outfit, and _why_ he wore it.

  • @onnixcarmichele3911
    @onnixcarmichele3911 4 роки тому +152

    I love that this movie came out 14 years ago, and people are still discussing its possible interpretations.
    Nolan knocked it out of the park with this film.

    • @davidlean1060
      @davidlean1060 4 роки тому +9

      His best film by a country mile in my humble opinion.

    • @flightofthebumblebee9529
      @flightofthebumblebee9529 3 роки тому +5

      I consider Memento and The Prestige as his best work. Batman Begins, Insomnia, and TDK are close 2nds. Then the rest are all fantastic too (including Tenet)

  • @deathdoor
    @deathdoor 4 роки тому +82

    What I find interesting in this story is that Jackman's character creates a clone of himself to sacrifice for the trick, while Bale's character is a "natural clone" that metaphoric decided to sacrifice the other of himself for the trick.
    Both does the same thing in different ways.

    • @thejamnasium6447
      @thejamnasium6447 25 днів тому

      it's science vs. God (nature)

    • @jestbone89
      @jestbone89 12 днів тому

      Angier uses Edison's way of DC for his trick with chain of killing the original, while Borden's method is similar to Tesla's AC by switching between the brothers.
      I found this interesting. No idea if it was intentional by the author of the book.

    • @deathdoor
      @deathdoor 12 днів тому

      @@jestbone89 AAAAAAAAAAAAAhHHH!! DC vs AC!! wow!
      Don't know if it's true, but "you have to believe".

  • @bookjunk
    @bookjunk 4 роки тому +83

    I am very attached to the idea of the duplication machine working, because it perfectly shows the lengths both of them are willing to go to best each other. One (well, technically two) of them keeps swapping identities, which basically destroys his family and the other one kills himself over and over again for his trick. I don't think Angier believes that the original version of himself ends up above the audience, but I do think he wants to believe that. It's either that or accepting that the real him has died the first time he performed the trick on stage and now every other time he performs it he's going to drown beneath the stage while a new clone reaps the applause.
    The novel the film is based on is absolute crap, by the way. The film is a vast improvement.

    • @scholzilla4188
      @scholzilla4188 6 місяців тому

      That really can't be a clone in the tank at the end. Drowning victims don't stay preserved like that and bulge with water.

    • @AshenSamarakoon
      @AshenSamarakoon 5 місяців тому

      That was my initial perspective as well. But, are we all agreeing to the fact that a machine which can duplicate anything (living or non living) which has the same consciousness level or the soul is logical? Another channel highlighted the fact that this was more of a psychological thriller type of a movie NOT A SCI-FI movie.

  • @rickmoranis7556
    @rickmoranis7556 4 роки тому +22

    Also, when Caine's and Jackman's characters first reunite, they work in a building with a wall of windows. Caine's character says, "We'll have to whitewash the windows (to) confound the more curious members of the public." At the end of the movie, we don't really see all the bodies... we see one body and the rest of the glass boxes have whitewashed windows.

    • @AshenSamarakoon
      @AshenSamarakoon 5 місяців тому +2

      That's a good point which I didn't see in anywhere else!

  • @DocKobryn
    @DocKobryn 4 роки тому +26

    I had always interpreted that the lines at the end were in reference to the fact that we didn't want to know that Angier killed 100 clones.

    • @saber9876
      @saber9876 Рік тому +2

      thats what he wants to think

  • @gordongraham2064
    @gordongraham2064 4 роки тому +174

    Main problem with this theory: Why did Angier set up that room full of fake dead clones? If he knew about the second Borden, then why allow himself to be bushwhacked to death? And if he DIDN'T know about the second Borden, why would he go to all the trouble of locking up these fake clone bodies?

    • @onnixcarmichele3911
      @onnixcarmichele3911 4 роки тому +34

      We don’t know that the room is full of them. We only see the glass tanks, and we only actually SEE one “clone” inside one of the tanks. The theory goes that this could be Angier’s double that he used earlier in the movie. Obviously, by us not seeing the rest of the tanks, it is still a possibility they are full of clone, but there’s an equal amount of circumstantial evidence that it was all just a grand illusion to trick the audience.

    • @gordongraham2064
      @gordongraham2064 4 роки тому +44

      @@onnixcarmichele3911 I'm not so much questioning whether he COULD set up the room as a fake-out, I'm questioning who we imagine he's trying to fake-out. If he knows about the other Borden, it seems like a stretch that he'd take the goof as far as to let himself be killed for it. If he didn't know about Borden 2, who did the set up the room for?

    • @Ellestra
      @Ellestra 4 роки тому +15

      @@onnixcarmichele3911 Still, why make tanks a real thing? It's an expensive prop to make - both tanks themselves and the floating figures inside. He only revealed the truth about the machine when Borden was in prison. He thought Borden died there. No one else was supposed to know. If trip to Tesla was just a tale so could've been the tanks. It's a lot of work and money spent for no one to ever see.
      Unless, he knew about the other Borden but then he was really unprepared for the revenge for a guy who prepared all this fake evidence of his trick.

    • @nguyenphuonganh5342
      @nguyenphuonganh5342 4 роки тому +4

      that's plan B. he doesn't know Borden gonna dead or not. Borden can escape. in my opinion

    • @kekagiso
      @kekagiso 4 роки тому +17

      Also, if the machine doesn't work then does Tesla just setup a bunch of identical black hats down to fool Angea into thinking that the machine works? What's his motivation for this? We see the machine working long before Angea sets up his show. And who does Angea shoot when he uses the machine for the first time? This theory is one huge reach, quiet unlikely. And if it's all predicated on Nolan not confirming something, well that's very shaky grounds. Nolan doesn't usually confirm or deny fan theories so that alone doesn't say much.

  • @TheSlasherJunkie
    @TheSlasherJunkie 4 роки тому +30

    To paraphrase an oft quoted line from Danse Macabre, Stephen King is on the same page as Borden- the answer satisfies no one. It’s the question the audience leaves the theater wondering that satisfies. That lingering, nagging, how? Why? What? They’re not plot holes, they’re not red herrings, they’re a matryoshka doll of morality.

  • @stephregnard
    @stephregnard 4 роки тому +106

    The thumbnail and the outfit are 10/10

    • @DeniseDutton
      @DeniseDutton 4 роки тому

      Best thumbnail 2020

    • @roj6895
      @roj6895 4 роки тому

      omg i hadnt read it until you said this lol

    • @valentina5885
      @valentina5885 4 роки тому +2

      I stared at Hugh Jackman's face before I noticed what whas written

  • @HappyBeezerStudios
    @HappyBeezerStudios Рік тому +6

    But truly the biggest trick in the movie is convincing us that both, Batman and Wolverine look damm good in waistcoats.

  • @xantrio6377
    @xantrio6377 4 роки тому +117

    It's an interesting theory but the "wax figure" part is a bit of a stretch. The reason why he would do it, does make sense though.
    Nolan didn't deny this theory is possible because that's what artists do. They want to leave room for any interpretation of their art.

    • @njuta
      @njuta 4 роки тому +25

      I agree, I think it's a fun theory. And Nolan not denying it is like a schrödinger's plot twist if you don't confirm either they're both right and wrong and you get credit for both of them.

    • @TrashHeapCustodian
      @TrashHeapCustodian 4 роки тому +4

      Also worth noting IIRC Nolan has done the same thing with the ending of Inception, never confirming whether the top falls or not. He just likes to let audiences play around and believe what they want, more or less

    • @akamikeym
      @akamikeym 4 роки тому +3

      There's a line in the film from Michael Caine saying that he's found better doubles than Root. I always read it that he was killing them. And the body you can see in the tank was one of them rather than Root.

    • @njuta
      @njuta 4 роки тому

      @TheRitualsOfTheSorcerer gross

    • @alephmorricone7207
      @alephmorricone7207 4 роки тому +2

      Not wax figure but plastic surgery on a dead body perhaps? See it was London and that dude was rich af . He was amoral and and wanted to screw Borden's head. Also I think the reason Root is not busted by cutter & Border is coz of the plastic surgery performed which might have cost Angier a fortune

  • @buffypython
    @buffypython 4 роки тому +73

    When Angier says he never knew if he was going to be the one up on the stage or down in the tank, what if the duplication machine was real & each time, the Angier going into the machine was the one who fell into the tank? What if the original Angier died the first time & every time he performs the trick, he basically dies & is replaced by a clone?

    • @jamesteavery0
      @jamesteavery0 4 роки тому +49

      So the thing is, (if this theory video isn't true) that is what happens. But also, the clone is the one that lives to tell the tale, and the clone is the one that experiences more and then the process repeats. Each time, the surviving Angier has only a continuous experience of being the prestige, giving him further confidence in repeating the performance (even if every single time, the man that goes on the stage is the one that ends up in the box). It's possible that by 100 performances, this confidence would have grown so much that the line 'I never knew...' would actually have to be a lie.

    • @thebacons5943
      @thebacons5943 4 роки тому +16

      buffypython I’ve actually always assumed this

    • @marcoolmedo1967
      @marcoolmedo1967 3 роки тому +1

      @@jamesteavery0 even if its random who of the 2 dies, the one who tells the tale is the survivor on the prestige.

    • @21972012145525
      @21972012145525 11 місяців тому +1

      I assumed this too

  • @logancox6548
    @logancox6548 4 роки тому +8

    I never even considered that he only killed the drunk lookalike, but that is a brilliant theory. Great analysis too. The Prestige is probably Nolan's best film, or at least my favorite.

    • @janellebridge226
      @janellebridge226 3 роки тому

      Unless Root had the best nose job ever in 1840... It wasn't Root.

  • @JebeckyGranjola
    @JebeckyGranjola 4 роки тому +19

    In the book both magicians had children and thier family hatred continued on through the generations until they ended up together. Like Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, this pretty much was Wuthering Heights with Wizards.

    • @21972012145525
      @21972012145525 11 місяців тому +2

      The author says the film adaptation is better and doesn’t follow his book

  • @stevegoodson9022
    @stevegoodson9022 4 роки тому +34

    Did wonder why that big reveal scene was so dark and murky, didn't even realise what was being shown on my first watch (my eyesight is pretty poor). Just put it down to Nolan's sensibilities, he seems to like barely visible scenes. Also, what's the point of the big pile of hats in the forest? Obviously there's nothing to stop someone in the fiction from dumping a load of identical hats in the forest, but from a film-making perspective I don't see why they would be featured unless it's to clearly show that the machine actually produces duplicates.

    • @richardcraven
      @richardcraven 2 роки тому +7

      this was my issue with this theory. the hats / the cats. This guy seems to explain it with 'that never actually happened.' which is kinda weak imo

    • @saber9876
      @saber9876 Рік тому

      @@richardcraven no i heard a theory that i liked more and it says that borden and tesla were in on it together to trick angier into funding teslas work

    • @21972012145525
      @21972012145525 11 місяців тому

      Agreed

    • @21972012145525
      @21972012145525 11 місяців тому

      @@richardcravenbut then again, why would Borden actually send angier to Tesla to actually get he machine?
      Unless he thought that he was going to trick angier into thinking he has the machine? Idk

    • @vitorsiqueira2276
      @vitorsiqueira2276 6 місяців тому +1

      I have a different vision: the target or audience was Borden, the vision of the top hats and the cat was the vision of Borden who read the diary, all of this had the objective of deceiving Borden who was the "public" that Angier wanted to deceive and with this he proved to be the best magician and Angier achieved so much that he killed the double who was the drunk and got the sentence which in his view was justice for killing his wife, but the other brother came and he tries the same trick but it doesn't work since this other person knew it was a scam!

  • @nameforcomments4092
    @nameforcomments4092 4 роки тому +5

    All I know is the top spun for way too long, and Batman sure did escape that nuclear blast quickly.

  • @dm9910
    @dm9910 4 роки тому +30

    I don't think it holds up for a couple reasons.
    First, it relies on certain scenes (shooting the clone, the hats, etc) being lies. It's possible, but a good unreliable narrator story needs to establish itself as such and follow the rules it's set up for itself. It's pretty bad storytelling if you just arbitrarily say that some scenes are completely fabricated, with no indication given.
    Second I don't see why Angier would save a tank with his dead double in it if it was just some dude. The reason he keeps them is because it's a kind of monument to his own sacrifice, it wouldn't make sense if they aren't clones. I also don't see why he'd have dozens of other empty tanks. He doesn't know any of this will be seen, so it doesn't make sense for him to set this up to fool anyone.
    Third it really cheapens Angier's sacrifice if it turns out he didn't really flip a coin to live or die. It was a major theme of the film that the trick is often sacrifice: the dove trick, the fish bowl magic, Borden sacrificing his marriage, etc.
    It's an interesting theory but there are too many holes in it. I think Nolan's refusal to deny it is just simple death-of-the-author style desire to not place unnecessary restrictions on how his film is interpreted.

    • @davepowder4020
      @davepowder4020 4 роки тому +2

      I'm leaning in this direction as well.
      However, if the machine is real, the scenario also paints Angier as a massively selfish, narrow, very short-sighted man. He has a machine that truly duplicates anything. Cows, gold, anything you want from 1895. He doesn't get massively wealthy, solve hunger, or anything. It's all dedicated to his trick and DIES with him.
      But, massive potential erased by extreme lack of vision is not a unique story, not by any means.

    • @Amleth89
      @Amleth89 4 роки тому +6

      ​@@davepowder4020 Not exactly, I mean, maybe he was going to do something of that but first he wanted to accomplish his revenge, putting your moral to a character doesn´t say anything about the film, after all, he is a murderer...

    • @rickdff62
      @rickdff62 3 роки тому +2

      @@davepowder4020 Plus if the machine was real, Tesla would be famous today for inventing a duplicating machine, ha!

    • @mikespearwood3914
      @mikespearwood3914 Рік тому +3

      @@davepowder4020 It's established in the film that Angier is actually a super wealthy British Lord in disguise as an "American" magician. His whole point in life is his stage act and revenge on Borden, and desire to outdo Borden.

    • @Gurrehable
      @Gurrehable Рік тому +3

      For the first point, indicators were given. The whole Tesla story is narrated by Angier and read by Borden in jail.

  • @sethheasley9538
    @sethheasley9538 4 роки тому +39

    You mentioned that Nolan didn't deny the theory. I'm curious if you'd take his word for it if he did. Personally, I wouldn't. I feel like creators shouldn't confirm or disconfirm any fan theories.

    • @vanyadolly
      @vanyadolly 4 роки тому +6

      Also considering the source material emphasizing never revealing the trick, I can't see him disproving any theories even if they are wrong.

    • @yourfriendoverseas5810
      @yourfriendoverseas5810 Рік тому +2

      Nolan knows the value of ambiguity (see the ending of inception).

    • @hunornemeth5745
      @hunornemeth5745 Рік тому +1

      @@yourfriendoverseas5810 Yes but inception's ending was confirmed

  • @guyledouche7939
    @guyledouche7939 Місяць тому +2

    He doesn't assume a false identity. He was born a Lord. He's only assuming his old one that no one knew he had.

  • @alexandrahansen7029
    @alexandrahansen7029 4 роки тому +11

    I always took that as a kind of juxtaposition between the words being spoken and the visuals - “seeing how it’s done,” in this case, is so monstrous and otherworldly that it’s too much to comprehend. So, in this scenario, we are the audience, and with the horror revealed of what Danton was doing to himself, would we want to see behind the curtain? When the price of knowing might be too much to take? Wouldn’t you rather think it was all an easily explainable trick, so the universe can stay the way you think it is? Like Frankenstein.

  • @Martin-xd4jl
    @Martin-xd4jl 4 роки тому +7

    Eh... It's kind of interesting, but I just don't think the narrative works in such a way that would allow the whole Tesla sequence to be fictional. If those scenes were framed as Angier telling the story in flashback, or explaining it to Cutter after the fact then sure, but as it stands it would feel like a jarring break with cinematic convention to read the movie like that.

  • @Joe-vg1rb
    @Joe-vg1rb 10 місяців тому +5

    But Angiers thought Borden was was going to hang, and had no reason to think he would ever see the hall of Angiers wax works...?

    • @davidlean1060
      @davidlean1060 2 місяці тому

      The trick, ultimately, wasn't to fool Borden. It's to fool the film's audience. Mission accomplished there by Nolan I'd say.

    • @oOOoOphidian
      @oOOoOphidian 2 місяці тому +1

      I think the key to this theory would be that Angier knew all along that Borden had a twin and his surprise at the end is merely feigned to make his story believable. What doesn't make sense is that the only way Angier gets a payoff is if he gets murdered by the twin, which feels very out of character of Angier to sacrifice his life and revenge only to make Borden think he was the better magician.

    • @davidlean1060
      @davidlean1060 2 місяці тому

      @@oOOoOphidian I think it's pretty clear Angier didn't know it was a double. This is why he is caught by surprise at seeing the surviving Borden.

    • @oOOoOphidian
      @oOOoOphidian 2 місяці тому

      @@davidlean1060 I agree it's really likely that was the intent in the movie, especially given that the book also has a machine Angier uses that works (albeit a bit differently from the movie). It's still fun that there is just enough ambiguity in the film that it could be either way.

  • @Princess_Weekes
    @Princess_Weekes 4 роки тому +57

    I love watching videos about The Prestige without ever actually watching it. I feel like I get all the good stuff and just watching the whole movie might make it less enjoyable ... hey, wait a second...

    • @21972012145525
      @21972012145525 11 місяців тому +3

      You’re wrong. I’ve literally seen it so many times. I not only see something new each time I watch it, sometimes I get confused if I knew it before or not, but I also learn something new each time I watch these. Now I’m confused if it’s knew or new 😅

  • @sauron1427
    @sauron1427 4 роки тому +6

    Interesting but this basically assumes that Angier knows the plot of the movie beforehand and in particular knows about Borden's twin. This makes no sense considering the lengths he goes through to figure out how Borden does his trick even though he already achieved the exact same thing with his lookalike.

  • @philipsmith1134
    @philipsmith1134 3 роки тому +38

    As much as I love this theory, I think that the movie is actually pretty straight forward, and follows exactly what is shown. Borden is an identity shared by twins, the machine did actually duplicate Angier, and everything else revealed at the end is correct. I believe the “you want to be fooled” final line is more about the Borden twin system, and the reveal that Angier had been killing himself for the trick.

    • @2QAYL1138
      @2QAYL1138 3 роки тому +5

      Yes, Cutter's last line is challenging the audience in a way, to see if they want to suspend disbelief & accept the story we've been presented with, or if we just have to know more because we're in disbelief that it's as simple as we're told. His conclusion is Nolan's, that audiences experience pretending in movies, but we accept and appreciate that pretense because we like how it makes us feel.

    • @21972012145525
      @21972012145525 11 місяців тому

      This is my
      Interpretation. Anything more hurts my head.

  • @thefollowingisatest4579
    @thefollowingisatest4579 3 роки тому +7

    Although the machine being real does work better for a cautionary tale of revenge, which makes all the Tesla stuff more relevant as well. A man is granted access to the greatest advancement in scientific history and uses it for revenge and murder, just as petty greed motivates Edison's pursuit of Tesla and denial of his dream in the film.

  • @Smoph04
    @Smoph04 4 роки тому +6

    I watched this when I was really young and only remember how Nicola Tesla was played by David Bowie. now I’m gonna have to go back and rewatch this because holy moly

  • @FriendlyKitten
    @FriendlyKitten 4 роки тому +15

    The Prestige, a film that just utterly baffled me :S

    • @foofy3406
      @foofy3406 4 роки тому

      Line Bjørgen if anything, i found it made too much sense. it was too in sync. too neat. probably the movie that’s easiest to write about. ever.

    • @Schmidtelpunkt
      @Schmidtelpunkt 4 роки тому

      @@foofy3406 Well, it is one of the few movies where Nolan sticks to a single topic and explores it to the end instead of juggling with ten different concepts, biting off a bit and then have them lying pointlessly around until the closing credits...

  • @thebacons5943
    @thebacons5943 4 роки тому +18

    What about all of the times we see hats and animals duplicated? Were those all just visualizations of the explanation given or did that happen?

    • @rickdff62
      @rickdff62 3 роки тому +5

      All of those instances were from Algiers' point of view as recorded in his diary. Therefore, we can't necessarily believe it happened that way. It could have just been Algiers putting false information in his diary for Borden's benefit.

    • @phililpb
      @phililpb 4 місяці тому

      @@rickdff62 the hats may have been placed there just to make it look like the machine worked. tesla left as soon as he got the money and the machine was delivered. if the machine was a phony then tesla would not want to be there when Angier found out.

  • @singularity1130
    @singularity1130 4 роки тому +40

    Coming from a love of Cosmic Horror I like to imagine he did use cloning and that the discovery of cloning lead to his partial insanity since he hit the philosophical roadblock of cloning/teleportation: What was teleported? No matter the method of cloning/teleportation you will reach a point where you must ask yourself, what part of me is me that I should target? I think someone as intelligent as him used his understanding of Illusions to figure out a harsh truth: There is no self. Self identity is the greatest illusion of all time and the replication of the self proves that he does not exist in the way he imagined as a singular entity, it's all smoke and mirrors called emergence.
    But instead of falling to pieces he ran with it and used this new understanding of the truth in order to have an advantage in his acts. No body would ever consider the possibility of clones nor would they accept it because that nagging truth of self-identity would critically damage their own sense of self. In that way it's akin to a cultist using the cognitive dissonance of an inductee to further push them away from their own sense of self and follow the cultist, but in this case it's the trick exploiting this psychological defense.
    That's the truth we aren't truly looking for and don't want to know. That identity is an abstract illusion used to give us order in a senseless universe so that we may survive. Everyone in the movie who casts away their sense of self is rewarded while those who hang onto their understanding of the world is tricked or left dying confused as to how they couldn't see how things lined up to their current predicament. And anyone pursuing him will go through mental gymnastics to avoid accepting his methods as plausible. Sending his investigator's into a spiral of layers upon layers of planning and trickery they made up for Angier assuming 'that's how he's doing it!'
    I also think that's the tragedy of Angeir's death, the advantage he had that people would ignore truth in favor of their own version was a double edge sword. Angier was one of the few who knew the truth that everyone unwittingly refused to see and even surrounded by evidence of this truth Bordem, the stand in for humanity, choose to ignore it because they'd rather cling to their own understanding. Humanity when given a chance to improve will willing choose to stay in mediocrity unless pushed to the brink with no other options; we'd rather live a lie then humor truth.

    • @ValentinPasseraH
      @ValentinPasseraH 4 роки тому +2

      Thank you for that. It was always the part of the movie that frightened me

    • @bifurioussiren
      @bifurioussiren 4 роки тому +1

      perfectly said. 👏👏

    • @2QAYL1138
      @2QAYL1138 3 роки тому +1

      Very well stated. I just have a problem with giving Angier more credit than he deserves. To me, he doesn't have truth that no one else does. Angier is twisted. He took Borden's lesson on sacrifice paving the way for a truly great trick & completely misinterpreted it. That's why he's portrayed as the villain by the end of the movie. Angier is a cynic who only understood recognition. He had no appreciation for craft like Jess' dad did.

  • @lsgreger2645
    @lsgreger2645 4 роки тому +22

    I know I have seen several critics pan this movie because it suddenly changes into the realm of Science Fiction/magic with no warning, but you have convinced me that Nolan was going for the ultimate trick in the end, and fooled even the critics......Which is what a magic trick is supposed to do. I need to rewatch it now!

    • @ItWasBetterBefore
      @ItWasBetterBefore 3 роки тому +2

      That's crazy. That's what I love most about this film!

    • @saber9876
      @saber9876 Рік тому

      think about what the movie is called

  • @MEDVE1978
    @MEDVE1978 4 дні тому +1

    This way there is a real parallell to Inception. In Inception Cobb decides not to look on his totem, because he is united with his kids. And only this matters, he is not concerned with the fact whether it is a dream or reality. He just enjoys the moment. And Angier does the same by quitting the race.

  • @jaegermeistersfriend
    @jaegermeistersfriend 3 роки тому +5

    For me the theory doesn't fit into the film's theme or genre. The underlying premise is that in any magic trick, you could spot the trick if you were looking hard enough but you don't want to.
    Fallon is the best example of that. On my first watch I did not see the twist coming at all - Fallon had this weirdly repulsive energy about him I didn't want to think about him. On every other watch I kept thinking to myself "How could I miss this? This is so obviously Christian Bale in make up".
    The film never out right lies to us - it may leave out scenes or show us the same scene from a different perspective later but at no point are we led to believe that what we're seeing isn't actually happening. So if the whole Tesla arc is a lie, just a visualization of what Borden is reading, I think the movie would betray its own statement and genre. Like a whodunit story in which the murderer is revealed based on evidence the audience was never given.

  • @StefanTetelepta
    @StefanTetelepta 4 роки тому +7

    What doesnt make sense is that you say that angier wants to fool Borden one more time. Why? As far as Angier knows Borden is already dead.

  • @sethheasley9538
    @sethheasley9538 4 роки тому +10

    I can't buy it, just because Borden so easily sniffed out Root in the first place.

  • @foofy3406
    @foofy3406 4 роки тому +8

    i once wrote a 39-page essay on this movie. not for school. i didn’t go to film school. i just did it for fun. it wasn’t half bad, no pun intended

  • @graymalkin7645
    @graymalkin7645 4 роки тому +6

    I love your channel and I love this movie so much. I always assumed that the duplication was a metaphor for Angier sacrificing his soul to his ambition. I know it's a bit shaky because if the machine actually could duplicate anything it touches the "soullessness" would apply to everybody, since everyone could potentially use it. But Angier is the one using it after all.

  • @jeremyarcus-goldberg9543
    @jeremyarcus-goldberg9543 2 роки тому +1

    This video is the best explanation. And your part 2 commentary breaks down the exchange between the men to reveal what is really going on in their dialogue.

  • @cannibalisticrequiem
    @cannibalisticrequiem 4 роки тому +5

    I mean, if I was Angier, I would be more than delighted to travel across the world to see David Bowie-- I mean, Nikola Tesla.

  • @DoggyHateFire
    @DoggyHateFire 2 роки тому +3

    Honestly, I like the film far more if the machine works. With the alternate theory it feels like you're just guessing what was in Nolan's head. The evidence that the machine doesn't work seems very weak and circumstantial. There's no real hinting that Angier is using a double/twin. The is nothing to suggest that Root was still around. Borden's brother was clearly foreshadowed and it's obvious upon a second viewing.
    People think the main theme of the film is about deception of the audience, but I think there's also another important theme that is also very important. When Borden explains the bullet catching trick to Sarah she says something to the effect that it's obvious once you know the secret. Then when Angier is trying to figure out Borden's transporting man trick Cutter is telling him the obvious answer which is Borden is using a double, but Angier can't believe it's that simple, but Cutter is basically right. Maybe the audience is trying to make something more complicated than it needs to be. The most obvious answer to how things ended is that the duplication machine worked and Angier was basically committing suicide every night hoping his clone appears.
    There's no reason to think this movie isn't sci-fi. It is, Christopher Nolan we're talking about. So that's how I think the film works best and how I enjoy it the most. If other people like other theories better, good for them.

    • @ty-zz9ic
      @ty-zz9ic Рік тому

      You like the film far more because you wanna be fooled
      Sorry I had to say it haha

  • @Synthetic-Rabbit
    @Synthetic-Rabbit Рік тому +1

    He got lucky dropping the drunk guy on the one and first night that Borden goes snooping under the stage.

  • @Tamlinearthly
    @Tamlinearthly 4 роки тому +5

    No. When Angier used a double, Borden spotted it right away. Even if this new double is somehow better, Borden wouldn't be fooled because he knows how that trick is done; in order for the story to play out, he has to be CERTAIN that it's really Angier he's seeing at every stage of the trick.

    • @MrVicbryant
      @MrVicbryant 3 роки тому +2

      Not only Borden, but he would have to be fooling Cutter as well. There is a scene were Cutter would be in a conversation with a body double for a extended period of time and there is no way they would pull that over on him.

    • @janellebridge226
      @janellebridge226 3 роки тому +3

      Correct, people are searching for ways for the machine not to work.... But they always fall short in proving it. Way too many things show that it does. Zero show that it doesn't.... Even in the book the machine apparently works. It just works. It's a movie and not real life.

    • @ty-zz9ic
      @ty-zz9ic Рік тому

      @@MrVicbryant Or Angier was so ambitious he got extremely good at it

    • @Gurrehable
      @Gurrehable Рік тому

      ​@@MrVicbryant Wait, so did Cutter know about the two Bordens?

    • @21972012145525
      @21972012145525 11 місяців тому

      @@Gurrehableyes

  • @elanamitchell9413
    @elanamitchell9413 3 роки тому +1

    I hate allowing myself to succumb to clickbait, but the thumbnail alone brought me to this video lol

  • @shannonh6077
    @shannonh6077 4 роки тому +8

    I immediately clicked after seeing your thumbnail 😂

  • @Skellyrox17
    @Skellyrox17 4 роки тому +3

    It's really nice to go back to your earlier videos and see that you did make the videos you were interested in creating. (I think you mentioned this idea back in 2015 or something.) Congrats on another year of great videos!

  • @Disthron
    @Disthron 4 роки тому +4

    2:35 Umm... isn't the one appearing on the balcony the clone and the one falling into the water the original? It's been a while since I saw the film but I seem to recall the cloned hat, and cat, appeared in the field while the original stayed where it was.

    • @AceOfSevens
      @AceOfSevens 4 роки тому +6

      They're both the original. There's no distinction. One sees himself as nothing having happened & the other as being teleported.

  • @HavelockVetinari
    @HavelockVetinari Рік тому +1

    So Borden suddenly lost the ability to tell Root and Angier apart, while he previously saw it immediately? Root was notoriously unreliable but was suddenly performing perfectly for a hundred shows? All the differences in Root's and Angier's looks disappeared somehow? All of that without the slightes chance for the audience to find that out by "watching closely"?

  • @legzfalloffgirl5148
    @legzfalloffgirl5148 4 роки тому +13

    Did anyone else have to watch this twice?😅😅

  • @TrashHeapCustodian
    @TrashHeapCustodian Рік тому +1

    Honestly after all these years and a few more movies under his belt, I think Nolan not confirming or denying the theory is his way of fucking with us.

    • @samuelbarber6177
      @samuelbarber6177 Рік тому

      A good artist doesn’t confirm or deny theories about their work. They generally prefer to allow their work and a person’s interpretation of it to speak for themselves. Death of the author and all that. If you can’t tell, I’m swiping at Ridley Scott just out and out saying: ‘Deckard is a replicant.’ When the movie left it vague.
      Plus, he’s Christopher Nolan, virtually all of his films (The Prestige especially) are just him messing with the audience.

    • @petermj1098
      @petermj1098 Рік тому

      @@samuelbarber6177 There is a theory that David Bowie’s Tesla is a fake Tesla and Andy Serkis’s Tesla was the real Tesla. Tesla had a fake double in order to trick Thomas Edison’s agents from stealing his work. Bale’s character knew the truth that it was a fake Tesla and Jackman’s character failed to see it. Tesla’s machine was not the magic trick Tesla was the magic trick.

  • @0749Rockystar
    @0749Rockystar 9 місяців тому +1

    When he said, "You want to be fooled." He meant that he knew that every time he entered the machine, he was guaranteed to die and make a clone of himself that carried on his life. He knows he is voluntarily dying, creating a clone that has to live with the horror of another body to dispose of and that clone knowing his days are numbered.

  • @djdoc06
    @djdoc06 2 дні тому

    Funniest line in the film:
    BORDEN: “What does he need my secrets for? His trick is top-notch. He vanishes, and then he reappears instantly on the other side of the stage - mute, overweight, and unless I'm mistaken, very drunk. It's astonishing, how does he do it?”

  • @lonerChise
    @lonerChise 2 роки тому +1

    This is a fantastic theory .... it just needs us to really suspend the disbelief: Chris Nolan ain't clever enough to make the movie That Clever

  • @lenaeospeixinhos
    @lenaeospeixinhos 4 роки тому +6

    Oh! I actually hated The Prestige. I felt so... underwhelmed by a real magic / fake science explanation that I thought I'd thoroughly wasted my time. Now I see I just watched the film very superficially. Guess that makes me a good target for tricks. But you got me wanting to watch it again.

    • @There-is.no-spoon
      @There-is.no-spoon 4 роки тому +1

      Don't fall for it Helena, underwhelmed is the perfect descriptor for this film. Or do. The choice is yours.

    • @lenaeospeixinhos
      @lenaeospeixinhos 4 роки тому +1

      @@There-is.no-spoon 😂

  • @malfattio2894
    @malfattio2894 4 роки тому +2

    Only a Nolan theory could be this meta

  • @AJGravityAnalyticaCap
    @AJGravityAnalyticaCap 4 роки тому +6

    A read of Christopher Priest's novel The Prestige might assist.

  • @jacobellis5822
    @jacobellis5822 4 роки тому +2

    Sooo what about all the hats in a pile? Just aesthetics?

    • @MrVicbryant
      @MrVicbryant 3 роки тому +2

      Telsa went out and purchased 100 hats in a complex plot to swindle Angier out of his money! I also believe Telsa turned frogs gay and is responsible for chem trails! This whole theory is weak and based on some pretty large assumptions that simply aren't really shown in the movie.

  • @davidm1926
    @davidm1926 4 роки тому +4

    It's established that Borden was(/were) able to tell that Root was Angier's double. To assume that, in the Real Transported Man, Angier was using Root or any other double, but Borden was(/were)n't able to tell, without the movie addressing why (t)he(y) failed to recognize it in the latter trick, is just cheaty fanwankery.
    Interesting, though.

    • @2QAYL1138
      @2QAYL1138 3 роки тому +1

      Indeed. I have a really hard time believing that Nolan's answer, the one he keeps to himself & doesn't tell, doesn't follow the rules & logic displayed in the movie, or that it incorporates concepts that are not even suggested in the movie.

    • @janellebridge226
      @janellebridge226 3 роки тому +2

      Correct... Bordan/s was/were onto Angiers first transported man double without issue.... but the next one when he comes back there is a scene where the Borden is going crazy because he can't work out how he does it. Mix that in with the absolute fact that it was the real Angiers (not Root unless he had the best nose job ever in 1850) in the water at the end, on the slab dead (also confirmed by cutter aswell) on stage and the balcony every time we see any footage of the trick post Tesla machine, going into the machine from the balcony and apperaring back at the balcony when showing that old dude the trick to get the show approved.....+ Cutter said "why aren't you dead to Lord Caldlaw and Cutter also said the machine actually works to the Judge..... + Angiers last line about not knowing if he would be the one drowning or the prestige every night. Man there is even more + apparently the machine is real in the book...... I'm looking everywhere to be shown that the machine doesn't work.... but I just can't find anything at all that proves it. I'm calling it's on what we are actually shown in the movie.... If people want to assume potential things and disregard things that were shown in the movie then that's up to them. I'm not even convinced that Angiers grand plan was to frame Borden... sure he'd take that, but Angiers needed to do what he done anyway just to do his show and be the Prestige everynight. Borden getting jailed may have just been a nice bonus.

  • @Sploberrie
    @Sploberrie 2 місяці тому +1

    I've seen people say that the non-linear presentation of this film is completely superfluous, but it does lend it more easily to unreliable narration. Certain events could've easily been fabricated by the writer of the journal they were described in.

  • @Sassy-qh5nh
    @Sassy-qh5nh 9 місяців тому +1

    Root has detached earlobes. Angier does not. The corpse on the slab has joined, hence Angier's, earlobes. They didn't "forget" the prosthetics.

    • @doctorposting
      @doctorposting 8 місяців тому +1

      holy shit. great observation

  • @333kenshin
    @333kenshin Місяць тому

    @coldcrashpictures your explanation and analysis both immensely deepened my enjoyment of the movie - already my favorite nolan and one of my all time tops - at all levels. thank you

  • @kevincraigmile7340
    @kevincraigmile7340 4 роки тому +25

    If you really wan to go deeper, read the novel by Christopher Priest.

    • @gateauxq4604
      @gateauxq4604 4 роки тому +8

      Oh god I read it. Its even more horrifying. Good but horrifying. Angier is an even bigger monster than we thought.

    • @CiceroSpeaketh
      @CiceroSpeaketh 4 роки тому +2

      Yeah I just got goosebumps thinking about the final chapter. It was such a riveting book...omg

    • @elgato49
      @elgato49 4 роки тому

      Based on the novel, did Angier copy himself?

    • @MrVicbryant
      @MrVicbryant 3 роки тому +1

      @@elgato49 Yes but with a stark difference. The machine in the book creates a body a set distance away and then moves the soul to that body. The old body is a near lifeless corpse/shell. In the movie it is a 100% fully functioning clone.

  • @fgoindarkg
    @fgoindarkg Місяць тому

    Bravo. You got it.
    Some people see.
    Some people see when shown.
    Some people don't see.

  • @Jord1996
    @Jord1996 2 роки тому +1

    This theory blew my mind. Also “A magician never reveals his tricks”

  • @SonnyK248
    @SonnyK248 21 день тому +1

    He's not murdering his clones. He's killing himself. The thing about identical clones is that they think they are you, but they are not you. The clone who comes out of the machine has all the memories leading up to turning the machine on so from his perspective he's been teleported. Also because he thinks the machine worked and he was teleported, he will be willing to do it again. And then that clone will do it again and die and his clone will have memories of being teleported in back to back shows and so on. Like the clone who comes out of the box on the 30'th show will have all the memories of coming out of the box for the previous 29 shows. But he didn't. He's brand new. Just like the clones who came out of the box the previous 29 nights. Because the one who comes out of the box will always think he's the original and have memories of coming out of the box all the previous times. The actual original falls into the tank of water every night and it's obvious from the look on their faces that they realize they F'd up. But there's no one to tell so the secret dies with them. Just look at the scene when Angier first uses the machine. It's the Angier that comes out of the box that gets shot but in the magic trick it's the Angier that comes out of the box that lives. The true Agier killed himself on opening night. Then from that point onward the clones were convinced that they would always come out of the box because they had memories of doing it all the pervious nights.

  • @janellebridge226
    @janellebridge226 3 роки тому +1

    Unless Root got the best nose job ever in 1850.... The clone machine worked.

  • @mxbravo3108
    @mxbravo3108 4 роки тому +1

    Oh no, I’ve gone cross-eyed again 😣

  • @mbuvito
    @mbuvito Рік тому +1

    Good breakdown! I really like your point at the end - and ironically, it’s the same reason I like inception. At the end, when the top doesn’t fall and the film cuts, the audience thinks it’s a cliff hanger. But Cobb is walking away, into his own reality with his kids, because they’re real to him. He didn’t care about the top. Just like how Borden doesn’t care to look at Angiers “proof”. Brilliant storytelling!

  • @funguy398
    @funguy398 4 роки тому +2

    What about the theory that there are hired actors in the water tanks in the end?
    Angier hired a lot of look-a-likes and killed them at the end of every show. He killed two birds with one stone, makes a teleportation trick and deal with the only person who knows the secret.

    • @MrVicbryant
      @MrVicbryant 3 роки тому

      I mean it is "possible" but very unlikely and requires many things set up in the movie to just be thrown aside, which is a lazy way to end a movie that is built on being clever. It is shown that a double shouldn't be the pledge in an act, as the build up and presentation of the act is what makes it work. The pledge sets the stage and the prestige only has to appear, bow, and leave the stage (this act is very likely the end of the show). For the drown person to just be line of actors that Angier is tricking would violate the rule they created earlier in the movie. It would also be hard to find/train 100 of these actors up to a standard that would fool Borden, who is very good at detecting stuff things, for each performance.

    • @janellebridge226
      @janellebridge226 3 роки тому +2

      I reckon there was more chance of inventing a clone machine than finding 100 Jackman lookalikes (secretly) in 1850.

    • @ty-zz9ic
      @ty-zz9ic Рік тому

      @@MrVicbryant I think it goes exactly with the film. “There’s always a double. Always.”

  • @hair-on-fire
    @hair-on-fire 5 місяців тому

    Using a wax model of himself in the tank doesn't make any sense because he had no idea Borden would kill him or that anyone would discover his secrets. It makes no sense.

  • @7864cwebb
    @7864cwebb Рік тому

    Angier and Freddy were the bad guys and Allen was the good guy…I’m sticking to it. Great vid!!

  • @Jason-fm4my
    @Jason-fm4my 4 роки тому +1

    If I wasn't considering this while watching the film I probably would have fallen asleep.

  • @2185JTT
    @2185JTT 6 місяців тому +1

    Then whole theory falls apart on two moments
    When Angier dies, he thought Borden was dead. He had no idea of a twin, there would be no reason for him to establish this whole act for someone he thought was dead. When he sees Borden's brother he is surpised by a twin, and even though he was told that was the trick, he didn't beleive it because it was too easy and too simple.
    Second is the fact Tesla made copies of a cat and Angier's hat. It wasn't the intent of the machine, but it was the result.
    The movie does show deception, just alike a magic trick, but it doesn't lie to us. When Fallon is on screen when you look closely you can tell its Bordon. Also when watching the movie you can tell which brother is which when they are "Borden" by their attitudes/personalities/romantic interests.
    The movie never showed us something, and then said well that didn't happen. Angier kills a clone of himself. It isnt told, it is shown.
    The machine works. Like younsaid when he find out the trick it is disappointing. In the scene where the auctioneer tells Cutters behind all the bells and whistles there is a disappointing trick. And Cutter says "most disappointing, its real"

  • @LK_tutturu
    @LK_tutturu 4 роки тому +4

    I will bite. Time for 3rd rewatch

  • @DivineAtheistWannabe
    @DivineAtheistWannabe 3 роки тому +4

    Anyone that believes in the theory that the machine did not work annoys the hell out of me......
    Their only reason for believing in such a theory is Cutter's final lines of the film.
    There really is NO evidence of it otherwise. Nothing in the film points to this.
    Honestly the film is made so beautifully (pointing to the fact that the machine was real).
    It's almost an INSULT to this masterpiece to say otherwise.
    Essay Time:
    Firstly, Root is not identical to Angier. They have subtle differences, but anyone that knew them personally would know the difference.
    Cutter analysed the bodies at the end. It would be obvious to him that it's Root that's lying there, not Angier.
    Therefore it's stupid if it's not a clone.
    Secondly, it's not plausible that Root would agree to doing the act properly.
    The magic trick was already ruined previously as he gained too much power. He was always drunk and could not deliver the lines properly.
    Saying that Root did the whole performance before disappearing is HIGHLY unlikely.
    Thirdly, there's no way to move that big tank of water to the bottom of the stage in time for that ONE performance where Bordon goes below stage.
    If it was really Root doing the whole performance, then they could only kill him once.
    If they could only kill him once, then they would have to move the tank down there on the same night that Bordon goes below stage.
    However it's only mere minutes between Angier spotting Bordon, and him going below stage.
    Fourthly, in order to do the trick properly with Root......he'd have to do the trick the same as Bordon. Have Root hide away half the time and lead a double life otherwise the trick would have been found out too easily like the first time.
    You really think that Root was going to live a double life and sacrifice as much as Bordon? Hide away half the time and become a different person just for Angier's sake? Or lets say that Angier was the one that went into disguise. There's no way that Root would be able to act as "Angier" off stage.
    Fifthly, the wax sculptures theory is just retarded
    There's no reason to have 20 tanks of water down there with wax sculptures. Anyone that saw it in person would be able to identify them as wax sculptures.....so what's the point of even having them. It doesn't make any sense plot-wise. Like, at all. It actually kind of shits on the beautiful plot that was otherwise already written. 15:30 Oh, he put the wax sculptures into the tanks of water to try and "trick" Bordon, so he could finally show Bordon that he's the better magician you say? Oh, I didn't realise that he already knew Bordon was a twin. I didn't realise he was planning to get ambushed and shot and killed by Bordon there that night. I mean, it's the only way he could actually show Bordon, right? Didn't Bordon just get hanged? For Angier's "master plan" to one-up Bordon and show off his superior magic skills, would rely on the fact that Angier already knew Bordon was a twin, would come back from the dead and ambush him there that night and kill him. lmao. Are you serious dude? Are you serious?
    Sixthly, the idea that Angier got Root to do the performance for that ONE NIGHT 6:18 so that he could kill him (I can't even believe you said that, are you braindead), see point #3 above. HOW COULD THEY SWITCH FOR THAT ONE NIGHT. So he got Root to rehearse Angier's lines perfectly......which he previously was incapable of doing.......for that ONE NIGHT. yeah, that's ridiculous. And how would he know which night Bordon would come. All of a sudden he see's Bordon inspecting the machine. And what then? How to get Root to be the one presenting everything and talk like he's Angier? This is so stupid. I think I lost brain cells watching you say that
    Oh, but hey! Cutter said that last line. Therefore lets throw the whole movie out the window.
    The whole movie hints at the ending that we're told.
    But Cutter delivered that one line that undid everything that the movie tried to accomplish. That one line, eh.
    It has nothing to do with revealing that Bordon was a twin (which was hinted at throughout the entire film). It's got nothing to do with Bordon telling us to watch closely when there was a hint that he was a twin. It definitely does not allude to the fact that we as the audience were given clue after clue after clue after clue during the film that Bordon was a twin and that we didn't realise till the end because we didn't really want to know the trick, since we wanted to be fooled.
    Nah, Cutter's last line is referring to wax sculptures and Root. Clearly eh. Cutter's last line eh.

    • @MrVicbryant
      @MrVicbryant 3 роки тому +2

      Just wanted to thank you for this write up. This theory is horse crap, an attempt by someone to latch onto a clever idea massage their own ego. We are suppose to believe the movie spends the entire buildup showing you how tricks are done, then randomly starts lying about how they are done at the end? The movie never establishes there is an unreliable narrator, so introducing one is dishonest.

    • @tylerdurden5303
      @tylerdurden5303 3 роки тому

      "You want to be fooled."

    • @ty-zz9ic
      @ty-zz9ic Рік тому

      Dude it really doesn’t matter if that man is Root or another lookalike that he acquired from anywhere in the world or he made his dublor have a strict diet as him or got him victorian plastic surgery. It doesn’t matter. It doesn’t necessarily have to be Root it may be another man.
      There’s a reason why those last lines from cutter exist. We need to focus on them and not just simply scrap them.
      They may be there to fool the audience once again, everything’s been explained but you’re still looking for something else because you’re still looking for the real trick. Something that won’t dissapoint you. or they may be there to actually reveal there’s still an illusion in the film.
      There are many times in the film they say for certain that magic doesn’t exist. Surely there must be a possibility the machine actually worked and that’s not magic. That’s science. But the real magic in this context is Angiel acquiring the Tesla machine. Angiel was fooled by being led to Tesla, then fooled again by tesla to be his financial source. Angiel had his wife killed, he had his show ridiculed by Borden. Surely he’s looking for justice, and luck to have that justice. Something that’s almost magical. But Angiel didn’t get that lucky. Because those kind of things don’t exist in the real world like Angiel said before he died. He would have wished that Tesla had made him a machine. Also, it’s very unlikely that Tesla and his asistant hadn’t realised all those hats were in the garden just like the film suggests.
      The film talks about sacrifice, yes. But I think Angiel makes sacrifices just as much without the suggestion of killing himself over and over. His sacrifice is devoting his life to this rivalry. (Mind you, not his craft, that was Borden’s sacrifice. Angiel was happy to be Lord Caldlow at the end and assumed dead.) But the illusion in the movie feels much more marvellous and in a way comprehensive. Just like a magic trick. But it’s not true. Angiel never had the power or luck to overcome nature or the way world works. Borden had a copy naturally, Angiel never had a copy. It was just another person. But he made that person so identical to himself that he could even fool Borden.
      If we were to analyse the time machine doesn’t work theory, I feel like the biggest question is why he put all those corpses in water boxes and displayed them. I think it wasn’t because he wanted to fool Burden. He never knew Borden had a twin. It was to fool Cutter to not report him to the police. Angiel had become extremely devoted to his craft and he didn’t even speak the truth even to Cutter. He probably wanted to make sure if cutter ever found out his trick, that he was using a double, it could somehow be revealed to Borden. But there’s also another thing. He was one day going to kill his dublor. Cutter could still report him to the police. Or reveal the murder to the police after the double was killed. But if Cutter absolutely believed he copied himself how could he explain that to the victorian police?
      The trick he used was making everyone and I mean everyone believe there was no double. A completely different person. But as the film shows, there’s always a double. Always.
      So the magic isn’t cloning. It’s simply finding a guy, (or changing the guy who already looked like him) to look almost identical to him. Which can be done. Extremely hard, but achievable. Whereas cloning doesn’t even exist today.

  • @MrO0Z
    @MrO0Z 9 місяців тому +1

    7:00 right there looked so much for that particular comment everyone kept writing how you see many clones in those tanks, all I could think was "I see one clear one and others maybe have a persons maybe not even". Thank you for pointing this out it was driving me crazy. Clearly nolan could have made it obvious if there were clones in those tanks but he did not. He actively chose to show only one angie.
    also do we know the time line of when the root dies and the body is shown that is on the autopsy table? maybe it is the same body.

  • @SylarMagic
    @SylarMagic 4 роки тому +2

    Asa magician, I approve of you theory. Great video man, just subbed!

  • @matthewJay88
    @matthewJay88 2 роки тому +2

    This was my fave movie for so long. Years ago when I watched it again, I came across this theory and was skeptical. But the more you think about it, it’s almost the most sensible ending. It goes with the theme of the movie perfectly that his greatest trick would be tricking his rival and seeing his face in disbelief as he dies. Then you think about Christopher Nolan and his love for ambiguity. It’s hard for me to believe this wasn’t possibly the point of the entire movie. Regardless, a great movie is one that you can’t stop thinking about long after you watch it. In both Memento and the Prestige, Nolan does that as well anyone’s ever done it IMO.

  • @Gurrehable
    @Gurrehable Рік тому

    I think the real twist ending solution is that Christopher Nolan casted Hugh Jackman and Christian Bale to play rivaling magicians that wants to one-up another while using special effects and editing

  • @2QAYL1138
    @2QAYL1138 3 роки тому +1

    6:35 Lord Caldlow is not a new identity. He pretended to be American Robert Angier to not embarrass his extremely wealthy, upper-class British family.

    • @josephcornelison6511
      @josephcornelison6511 2 роки тому +1

      When Borden asks Angier, "you must be lord Caldlow," he responds "yes, I am. Always have been."

  • @JohnnyBurnes
    @JohnnyBurnes 2 роки тому +2

    ...How come Tesla didn't just duplicate money?
    Also, Jackman did the trick multiple times (100). He also walked into the electricity. A wax sculpture can't walk...Unless Tesla's machine brings it to life!
    If it was a dummy, why bother drowning it? To convince the blind man?
    Why isn't Andy Serkis CG?
    How'd David Bowie get so cool?
    Can Scarlett Johanson possibly get hotter?
    THIS MOVIE BOGGLES THE MIND!

  • @graemefeeney2256
    @graemefeeney2256 7 днів тому

    The original Angier died on the opening first trick or you can argue it happened during calibration tests. Either way, he died and the clones took over and repeated the process.
    So it was the ultimate sacrifice like he was saying.

  • @AceOfSevens
    @AceOfSevens 4 роки тому +1

    This doesn't hold up. The movie establishes that Root was unreliable & gives lots of reasons he couldn't work for this sort of thing.
    It supposedly fixes a plot issue with going to see Tesla being a huge coincidence, but it creates way worse problems. Angier didn't know when Borden would make it backstage. It has to be set up so any night would work. More importantly, Angier doesn't know there are two Bordens. He has no reason to set up a big reveal room when he thinks Borden is busy getting hanged & not coming.

  • @danijobi
    @danijobi 4 роки тому +35

    This is actually really convincing. I wasn't expecting that. The "Look at all the elaborate puppets I made in order to pull off one last illusion" story actually feels much more believable than the "Oh, but he's using REAL magic from a magical Tesla character that has nothing to do with the historical figure" cop-out, which I always had a problem with. You should have included that into your analysis of the themes: This is a film about illusions and trickery first and foremost. To believe that Nolan would just sell this concept out with some cheap "no, but there actually IS real magic" nonsense, THAT is the theory that would do disservice to the film and its themes.

    • @Amleth89
      @Amleth89 4 роки тому

      But the thing is that you want to believe there´s something more, he´s showing it from the start.

    • @lunali7209
      @lunali7209 4 роки тому +1

      teleportation isnt magic though. its science.

    • @danijobi
      @danijobi 4 роки тому

      @@lunali7209 I disagree, but it doesn't really matter - the rest of the film shows stagecraft and trickery clearly available in this time and place where the movie is set. This "teleportation" trick would require way, way out science fiction that has nothing to do with the science of Tesla and clearly was not consistent with the technical abilities of these times. (also: it's not really teleportation, though, is it? It's multiplication/instant cloning.)

    • @LK_tutturu
      @LK_tutturu 3 роки тому +1

      @@danijobi the novel this movie based on involved real magic cloning, albeit different outcome. But you know, death of the author and all that stuffs

    • @HappyBeezerStudios
      @HappyBeezerStudios Рік тому

      @@lunali7209 "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic"
      For us it seems like a simple scientific idea, but it we look back a century things change a bit. That was the time when people thought there was life on Mars and Venus and you could sail on the ether between the stars. When people drank mercury and irradiated water to be healthy and electricity in that use was still rather novel. A machine that sparks and seemingly teleports people is close enough to magic that people can be convinced it is.

  • @EmoBearRights
    @EmoBearRights 4 роки тому +2

    I don't think it matters the point is that Angiers is prepared to do anything for revenge even murder whether it's himself or another person. He wants to make Borden lose something like he did. In the end Borden has already lost his wife in living a double life and then loses his twin. That's why he doesn't care and only wants to avenge Angiers or stop him taking more just as Angiers doesn't want to know the trick he wanted to up stage. Borden has paid too much and just wants to preserve what's left.

  • @noeloumard9106
    @noeloumard9106 4 роки тому +4

    Are we really already at the point at, when there is no unexplained impossible twist at the very end of a Nolan Film, we have to make one up ourselves?^^ Let the guy tell a story with a proper ending for once!

    • @NineWheels
      @NineWheels 4 роки тому

      How about you let other people enjoy media how we want to?

    • @noeloumard9106
      @noeloumard9106 4 роки тому +2

      @@NineWheels Uuuhm...I didn't really stop you from doing so?
      But that aside, I hoped it was fairly obvious my first comment was said with a wink. It was more making fun of Nolans constant twisty endings that are so numerous, that when there isn't a final incredible twist, we still expect one.
      I like fan theories and I enjoyed this video for that matter :) I don't agree with this specific theory but I didn't mean to tell anyone they have to agree with ME. Possibly I have to sharpen my sarcasm though

    • @NineWheels
      @NineWheels 4 роки тому

      @@noeloumard9106 I'm sorry, I guess I overreacted. It's hard to tell when someone's Really Serious about an opinion like that, especially on UA-cam, so I admit I've gotten a little tetchy about it. My bad.

    • @noeloumard9106
      @noeloumard9106 4 роки тому +1

      @@NineWheels Nevermind mate :) Have a nice time

  • @mikemikeson6049
    @mikemikeson6049 3 роки тому

    Bale made mental sacrifises and hugh made physical sacrifises

  • @fgoindarkg
    @fgoindarkg Місяць тому +1

    Why do you think Nolan cast another actor to play Fallon?
    Why did he insist on casting Bowie as Tesla?

  • @Phantom_madman
    @Phantom_madman 2 роки тому +8

    Nolan is the same guy who made the interstellar ending with supernatural elements. I think he’s serious about the cloning machine.

    • @evanwakelin7944
      @evanwakelin7944 Рік тому +2

      I don't think Interstellar technically has ANY supernatural elements. The 'beings' that formed the tesseract and made the wormhole turned out to be just the people in the future.

  • @ebbyc1817
    @ebbyc1817 4 роки тому +4

    The video I'd been waiting for (without knowing it...).
    The film left me feeling, almost complicit in the crime. I didn't want to believe Angier was killing his clones. Even though I saw him do it the first time, with his own hands. And I still don't like the fact that they show us the body in the tank at the end. I wanted to be fooled.
    Maybe that's the 'trick'. What we want to believe, versus, what we know. If we can fool ourselves, it is the greatest trick of all.

    • @seosamhrosmuc
      @seosamhrosmuc 4 роки тому +3

      He wasn't killing his clones,he was killing himself.The "clone" is up on the balcony.It's like the trick with the birds,the original is destroyed.

    • @ebbyc1817
      @ebbyc1817 4 роки тому +2

      @@seosamhrosmuc In the first scene where he uses the machine, he shot his clone with a gun. I think.

    • @Amleth89
      @Amleth89 4 роки тому

      @@ebbyc1817 So the clone is the one that appears far...but when he says that he doesn´t know wich one he will be, gives a hint that there´s no way of knowing how the machine will work. Either way ,the clone has the same memories and feelings, so, it´s like killing himself and committing murder every night.

    • @MrVicbryant
      @MrVicbryant 3 роки тому

      @@Amleth89 That is correct, and any discussion of which is the clone is pointless as they are 1 to 1 versions of each other. The surviving clone of the 47th run of the act has a memory of performing the act 47 times, and the dying clone was a 46 time winner that has finally lost. The Angier that is shot by Borden can remember back to his childhood, there is no difference between the versions.

    • @ty-zz9ic
      @ty-zz9ic Рік тому

      @@ebbyc1817 But the movie is a big magic trick. We see Borden kill himself just like the audience in the magic shows sees Borden’s twin and Angiel’s dublor appear.

  • @Lilypale
    @Lilypale 4 роки тому +2

    Thank god!! I heard you say this theory in another video and I’m so happy we get it explained 💕

    • @Lilypale
      @Lilypale 4 роки тому +4

      Also now that I’ve finished the video, thank you for the point that plots conspiracies and hot takes on films only matter if they evolve the character arcs and storytelling catharsis in some way. What you said was a cool new way of looking at each of the characters. I can’t stand film theories that are like every Disney movie is one big connected timeline because to me it doesn’t add any value to the storytelling

  • @kristinanderson3374
    @kristinanderson3374 Рік тому

    My guess, several years after The Prestige’s release, and after watching Tenet and Interstellar, it’s a Time Machine. Read up on Everette’s ‘many worlds theory’. This would also explain his line, ‘I did not know if I was going to end up in that box or on the balcony.’ I don’t think he truly knew because he merged two timelines into one. Tesla’s theory about the universe being compromised of energy, frequency, and vibration also supports the machine functioning more like a Time Machine than a cloning machine. Or maybe I’m just splitting hairs, lol.

  • @g.n.6101
    @g.n.6101 3 роки тому

    What a cool take!! I love the idea of knowledge being like this ephemerally antagonistic or liberating thing, dependent on framing of characters, but the idea that this theory allows for like, perpetual discussion over the theme is just *chef's kiss* amazing because it translates that knowledge theme directly to the audience, and doesn't contradict canon which, props. Thanks for sharing this!!

  • @aperson4640
    @aperson4640 3 роки тому +6

    Earlier in the story, Al the ingenieur twin easily spotted the Root double as being drunk, silent, and unable to perform the pledge. Now root is sober, can perfectly mimic Angier's voice and perform the pledge, the turn, and the prestige well enough to fool Al Borden; who already spotted him before?
    Also, Angier is now a master magician who knew of Borden's secret twin all along (otherwise why would he have the wax dummy prop prepared to show to Borden who was in prison,) yet pretended not to know with Cutter... why?
    Bruh, that's just of the top of my head. This comment section doesn't even allow enough space to type all the holes in this, "machine does nothing," theory.

  • @picantehuevos7389
    @picantehuevos7389 Рік тому

    My theory is that the gun used at the end was one that was set up, to not fire a bullet

  • @gateauxq4604
    @gateauxq4604 4 роки тому +14

    While Im not really convinced this was a great video. The Prestige is one of my favorite movies as well-so much so that I named my twin kitty boys Albert and Fredrick Borden. Because of them? Ive spent a few viewings trying to figure out which twin is on-screen at any given point in time.
    Fredrick is the asshole that ‘cheats’ on his wife and is executed while Albert is the nicer one who designs all their tricks, is actually married and (hopefully) the father of his child, and confronted Angier at the end. One could argue that either name combination is correct but thats exactly how my boys are so thats what Im going with. :)

  • @neozzickmixes3987
    @neozzickmixes3987 3 роки тому +1

    Maybe Borden never really had a twin brother? What if that was a clone, and him writing Tesla was really the answer. There was nothing that really told us he wasn't the first to clone himself, we just assumed it was a biological twin based on what Cutter said and the ending