Why I'm selling the Hamilton Khaki Field Auto - Brutally Honest Review

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @mowatches
    @mowatches  Рік тому +4

    👉 What do you think of the Hamilton Khaki Field Automatic? And does the lack of AR coating on the crystal bother you? 💖 Let me know in the comments!
    🔔 If you liked the video please subscribe to my channel for future reviews www.youtube.com/@mosproblems?sub_confirmation=1
    #HamiltonKhakiField #Automatic #WatchCommunity #FieldWatch

    • @sebmor82
      @sebmor82 9 днів тому

      @@mowatches hello. The crystal is domed and no AR. But it s OK. The best field watch forme for sure is the new German hannart field watch.

  • @jokester5812
    @jokester5812 4 місяці тому +128

    For half my life i wore a tiny watch that was 7mm thick, quartz, no screw down crown, no AR coating no micro adjustment on the clasp and only splash proof and i never ever had a problem, i loved the bloody watch. Now i have 35 watches and non of them satisfy me, and all this since I started watching youtube reviews. I think its time to unplug…

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  4 місяці тому +14

      Hey man, absolutely understand and feel this comment. The deeper we get into this hobby, the more picky we become. However, this should never hold us back from liking watches for what they mean to us personally. And who cares for the specs when you and your watch went through thick and thin together?

    • @josephmcbrien7646
      @josephmcbrien7646 4 місяці тому +12

      Must reviews are just ads. I feel for this trick also 😂😂

    • @axisdriftguitarworks1384
      @axisdriftguitarworks1384 4 місяці тому +9

      I totally agree with you. The watch thing has been blown out of all proportion. This is all about marketing, "storytelling", used car salesmen gimmicks and not reality.

    • @jokester5812
      @jokester5812 4 місяці тому

      @@axisdriftguitarworks1384 iv had it with all of them. I bought a 35mm digital prx, i ordered it from the factory before it was even available from dealers and it was 330 pounds, not an earth shattering amount but you should see the abuse, bloody hell. I love the bloody thing, i always wanted a swiss digital watch with a nice bracelet and sapphire. I absolutely love it, it goes swimming, it does everything. From the abuse it gets online ud think its a former concentration camp guard.

    • @ildefons3k540
      @ildefons3k540 3 місяці тому +4

      I had the same. A long time ago I bought a timex . I loved it but now I have a lot of watches and I'm still unhappy.

  • @chrisgrieves1468
    @chrisgrieves1468 Рік тому +82

    I've had the 38 for some years and the reflective nature of the crystal has never bothered me at all. In fact I think the dial with all that detail is a legibility work of genius. As a work-time beater watch, well it can't be beat. I wear it exclusively on a number of different NATOs and get that change-up every time. Each to their own.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому +2

      The NATO-compatibility of the watch with its 20mm lugs is seriously cool, I was super impressed when I tried it on some straps how stunning it looked on basically all of them.

    • @pickles632
      @pickles632 Рік тому +3

      I completely agree! I think its one of the best every-day watches on the market!

    • @edjenvey8576
      @edjenvey8576 Рік тому +1

      Personally disagree I returned this watch due to lack of AR

    • @BassJournal
      @BassJournal Рік тому +5

      After using a watch with ar coated crystal you can never go back. Khakis crystal is terrible

    • @andrewsarchus6036
      @andrewsarchus6036 Рік тому +5

      @@BassJournal Not so at all for me. I have a Seamaster 300Mc with superb internal and external AR on the crystal. So good is it that you can hardly tell there is a crystal there at all. Lack of AR on the Hamilton makes the sapphire crystal a feature, not a bug

  • @johnnelson9252
    @johnnelson9252 Рік тому +26

    I got my Hamilton Khaki Field Automatic in 38 mm nearly two years ago. I absolutely love it. All of the things you don't like are important to you and I respect that. But they don't bother me. On the other hand, I'm totally irrational about accuracy and my watch gets COSC specs out of the box, after a break in period of a couple of months.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому +2

      That accuracy is pretty impressive and I'm happy to hear that you are enjoying it :)

  • @whiskey6350
    @whiskey6350 Рік тому +38

    I have 5 Hamiltons and while the lack of AR coating is noticeable it’s never been an issue (except the few times I attempted to photograph them😂). And while noticeable it’s not a dealbreaker by any means, nor was it on my Rolex’s. I have many watches with and without AR but it has never been a reason to not purchase or wear them.
    Second, I actually enjoy a larger crown and don’t find them out of proportion for a field watch, but I also have fat fingers so a larger crown is nice. Also, this is a field watch with 100m water resistance, not having a screw down crown is not unusual. If it was a dive watch it would be worth mentioning but is completely unnecessary for a field watch.
    Third, The dial is a bit cluttered but purposefully so and is the reason I like a field watch, keep it mind that your looking at 3 functional dials. I personally don’t prefer the date and some don’t include it, like my Titanium Khaki. They offer version with no date, date, and day/date and even have different placements on the dial for the date window. With so many other choices in the Hamilton line you just chose the wrong watch.
    As far as the bracelet goes, I think they do the job. Are they great? No, but they are a lot better than most in that price category, overall I prefer a strap as most do with a field watch.
    And finally in the end you compare it to your Black Bay 58 at more than 3 times the price which is not a comparable watch either in price category or type/style. To compare a $600 watch to a $3,000 watch and say it’s cutting corners is a bit disingenuous.
    Okay, rant over.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому +2

      Hey, first off thanks for your great comment and review! Please don’t get me wrong, I do think it really is a superb watch especially for the price. It’s just that the AR coating would have been the icing on the cake and I did not get why they would not check this box as well if the rest is so on point. Also I would personally as a customer be willing to pay 50$ or more for it, so that‘s why I felt they were cutting corners. The other things I mentioned are just minor flaws I felt that were missing in other reviews. I‘m always trying to provide additional value with my videos and I felt that this perspective I‘m having was not covered yet, so please don‘t take it personal :)

    • @whiskey6350
      @whiskey6350 Рік тому +2

      @@mowatches I agree, it would be a very nice addition across their whole line of watches and as long as they have been in business you would think that they would have been able to figure out a way to do it economically. I just hate to see you pass on what I believe is a great watch. My main two work/beater watches are the Hamilton Khaki and the Tudor FXD, I can’t seem to get into G-shocks

    • @TeddyBoy7796
      @TeddyBoy7796 Рік тому +1

      Good points well made.

    • @TeddyBoy7796
      @TeddyBoy7796 Рік тому +2

      @@whiskey6350Tudor FXD as a beater? bloody hell, what’s your watch for best, a Patek Phillippe 😂

    • @nhbmk
      @nhbmk 7 місяців тому +1

      @@TeddyBoy7796 Bro, you FR? Patek is what I use as a daily beater…

  • @richieb74
    @richieb74 9 місяців тому +6

    i like that where isn't a coating, coatings arrnt as hard as the sapphire and can scratch, and i like the reflections, looks great!

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  9 місяців тому

      Sweet! I can definitely see your point. Thanks for the comment ☺️

    • @jorgefajardo2213
      @jorgefajardo2213 Місяць тому

      Coating has to be on the iside

  • @michaelriera6277
    @michaelriera6277 Рік тому +11

    Yes lack of AR is an issue on a domed crystal on a black dial. I have the 40mm Khaki King Auto that exhibits similar issue. I’ve simply accepted as a characteristic of the watch.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому

      Yeah, I think it can be perfectly fine as soon as you get used to it. Especially being outdoors the problem was less obvious than inside the house with less light. Other than that also the Khaki King is a beautiful watch!

    • @Mehdital89
      @Mehdital89 2 місяці тому

      Murph 38mm FTW

  • @raycarrara8264
    @raycarrara8264 Рік тому +4

    I've had the Hamilton khaki automatic for six years. It has exceeded my expectations. It is typically on my wrist 24 to 20 hours a day

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому

      Thanks for the comment and glad to hear that 🔥

  • @thecoment3371
    @thecoment3371 Рік тому +5

    Puhh, i am very thankful for your review, the info about the reflective crystal is SO important for me. My Grand Seiko sky flake also have a domed crystal, but its coated and dial is all visible, i was about to buy the Hamilton until i saw this review, again thank you 🙂

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому

      So glad to hear that! I absolutely appreciate the feedback and am happy to hear that the video helped you :)

    • @TillSwims
      @TillSwims 9 місяців тому

      Have you saw it at a dealer ?

  • @johnstyron6543
    @johnstyron6543 Рік тому +17

    I can see your point. I think it’s still a lovely watch but does deserve some AR coating and screw-down crown to be a proper field watch.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому +2

      Absolutely agree with you! Because it is such a cool timepiece otherwise, the reflective crystal (domed sapphire + lack of AR coating) is such a mismatch in my opinion.

  • @GARR0N
    @GARR0N 9 місяців тому +2

    I just want to note that this watch is meant to be an everyday watch, field watch that happens to cross multiple styles. However adding an AR (Anti-Reflective Coating) to the watch would lower the resistance of the glass to scratches as the coating isn't as hard a sapphire (Obviously).

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  9 місяців тому +2

      I agree, but they could also put the coating layer on the inner part of the crystal, which would help already a little. And I have some watches for 200 bucks with AR coating that has been extremely scratch resistant so far

    • @GARR0N
      @GARR0N 9 місяців тому

      @@mowatches that's good idea I didn't realise that would be able to work. thanks for the reply :)

    • @frznrrfan.frznrrfan102
      @frznrrfan.frznrrfan102 8 місяців тому +1

      ​@@GARR0Nprobably 95 percent of watches with AR coating is on the underside.

  • @dennyterrio1942
    @dennyterrio1942 Рік тому +26

    Love mine. I've taken my 42mm from the tundra to the desert. The polished bezel shows scratches ...scratches that you totally remember the adventure that made them.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому +2

      That‘s how they are ment to be worn, telling your personal story :) so cool how you went with it on your adventures! Definitely a watch that can do it all!

  • @rogersposts818
    @rogersposts818 3 місяці тому +3

    I have the older 36mm Khaki automatic. I will never part ways with it except when I die, and will be passed to my family. Thanks again for another great watch review!

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  3 місяці тому

      Again, thanks for your comment :) 36mm on this one sounds amazing, really reminds me of the explorer.

  • @daveLin104
    @daveLin104 Рік тому +10

    I quite like the domed crystal it gives the watch a little pop if that makes sense. I have this in the collection and love it, never had a watch go with as many straps. My biggest issue is only 2 micro adjusts on the clasp so I can't wear it on bracelet:(

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому +2

      Generally I also think that the domed crystal fits the watch quite well and underlines its rather dressy character as opposed to the classic field watch style. But for me the combination of the domed crystal and the lack of AR coating just makes it so much more reflective than all of my other watches, which is a real bummer. Regarding the bracelet, I made a similar observation and had to wear it pretty loose on the wrist - but the NATO compatibility definitely makes up for this flaw.

    • @daveLin104
      @daveLin104 Рік тому

      @@mowatches your right about the natos suits anything 🙂

    • @SL-xy5pn
      @SL-xy5pn 4 місяці тому

      Also wish the bracelet had more microadjustment holes. I had to sell my bracelet because I couldn't get it it to fit right. Otherwise a great watch and looks beautiful on a good leather strap.

    • @daveLin104
      @daveLin104 4 місяці тому

      @SL-xy5pn seen a hack online and bascially you remove the end part of the bracelet that fits in the clasp and connects to the micro adjust. You simply remove this and connect the bracelet link directly onto the clasp micro adjust secure and unseen and given more adjustment. The only thing 1 link the hole needs drilling out slightly to fit. I agree 💯 though it should have 3 or 4 holes the clasp is big enough !!

  • @danijeljenko184
    @danijeljenko184 Місяць тому +2

    Interesting! The dome shape crystal is actually the most beautiful part of this watch!

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Місяць тому

      I agree that it looks amazing, but without the AR coating it adds to the reflectiveness. Nevertheless it is an amazing watch! Thanks for your comment

  • @camels3269
    @camels3269 Рік тому +8

    For me, the lack of AR coating was also a deal breaker and ultimately the reason why I sold my Khaki Field King. That being said, I think that watch reviewers tend to review a watch based on the price bracket that a watch is in. With higher prices, you can expect better quality. There is just no way that a relatively cheap watch does not have to make consessions somewhere. For the price, these Hamiltons are still a great buy and excellent value for money. But if one of the negatives is a personal dealbreaker, then that ofcourse does not matter.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому +1

      I absolutely agree with you here. Moreover I totally get why people do not concentrate on the crystal when reviewing the watch, bc it is so amazing considering it's price point. But also that's exactly the reason why I think it is such a pity they did not invest these few extra dollars for the AR coating in the first place - as a customer I would also be willing to pay more for it.

  • @fateequinox8196
    @fateequinox8196 Рік тому +5

    Sold within a week as well. Non screwdown, poor lume and reflective glass were the main reasons

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому +1

      Eventhough it is a bummer that you didn’t like it, I’m kinda glad you made the same experiences - because I already felt bad and thought my expectations were too high 😅

    • @fateequinox8196
      @fateequinox8196 Рік тому +2

      @@mowatches Not at all, for the price and a field watch that is really not acceptable and small things that can be done

  • @N3VURMYND
    @N3VURMYND 5 днів тому +1

    Just ordered this watch. Also purchased a replacement AR Crystal for 45 bucks.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  5 днів тому

      Cool, keep me posted how the replacement worked 😎

  • @FightGenius98
    @FightGenius98 Рік тому +1

    I purchased the new 38mm hamilton murph interstellar and was incredibly disappointed at this exact same issue. The website stated that there was AR coating on the crystal so I thought , perfect. However, after wearing the watch in different lighting the AR coating is basically negligible. Such a shame , beautiful watch but I ended up selling it.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому

      What a pity! It just doesn’t make sense to me why they would leave out the AR coating on their models..

  • @bensanto2896
    @bensanto2896 Рік тому +4

    For me the reflective crystal glass is what makes this watch look great.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому +1

      Hey, thanks for sharing, that’s a really interesting perspective! It definitely makes the watch more “shiny” in a way

    • @andrewsarchus6036
      @andrewsarchus6036 Рік тому +1

      For me too. The super AR crystals make the crystal effectively disappear but the Hamilton renders that glorious sapphire a serious feature of the watch.

  • @guclumelek79
    @guclumelek79 3 місяці тому +2

    That was the reason I sold my Khaki King & Seiko Presage. But Khaki Autos are still very handsome and you can't beat its quality and sturdiness at that price point..

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  3 місяці тому +1

      Happy to hear that you think the same, and absolutely agree - the quality for the price is unparalleled.

  • @dgw1970
    @dgw1970 Місяць тому +1

    I've the 42mm Khaki field. It makes me feel wonderful. I love it. That's all a watch needs to do, other than keep time.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Місяць тому

      Totally agree and happy to hear that you feel this way! Thanks for the comment and keep on enjoying this amazing watch!

  • @issa9732
    @issa9732 10 місяців тому +2

    Finally! someone who shares the same opinion as me! Mineral crystal gets a lot of hate bur it allows a clear view of the dial in any angle. I recently bought the seiko alpinist laurel deep lake blue and returned it the next day due to the reflections and glare! What good a watch is if you can’t see the dial.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  10 місяців тому +1

      Hey, thank you so much for the comment, absolutely appreciate it and happy to hear that you see it the same way. What especially annoys me it that on the production side its just a few bucks more, so I cannot understand why the manufacturers build such amazing time pieces and then to cut the cost on the last mile, does not make sense to me.

    • @issa9732
      @issa9732 10 місяців тому

      @@mowatches you are right. I think this is a case of manufacturers scumming to the demands of the customers. Everyone is asking for sapphire due to its scratch resistance properties but they forget that sapphire is highly reflective. Brands here have multiple options when it comes to AR coating: 1) do nothing! apply no AR coating, which is what Rolex used to do up until recently and treat the reflections as an attention grabbing feature! 2) Apply AR coating on the inside only. That’s because the AR coating on the outside can get scratched. This is the case with your watch but AR coating on one side will not solve the glare problem 3) Apply AR coating on both sides. Which kinda beats the purpose of Sapphire, but most high end brands go for option 3 because, well, costumers want to see the dial too!

  • @travisharrisphotography
    @travisharrisphotography Рік тому +7

    Yeah, this is my issue as well. I went to look at one yesterday and I was wearing my Sinn 556, LOL. I just could not see the dial! If they just added the AR, I would have bought one!

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому +1

      I can imagine that the contrast to the double coated Sinn must be huge! Anyway, even though it is twice the price of the Hamilton, I think the 556 is an amazing alternative. Do you wear it on a leather strap or bracelet?

    • @travisharrisphotography
      @travisharrisphotography Рік тому

      @@mowatches So, I found the Uncle Seiko "president" bracelet for the 556 and it's very nice, and tapers down to 16mm like my BB58. This works well with the Sinn 556i. Beyond that I wear it on a nice black and white sailcloth strap from Artem. Very nice combo!

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому +1

      Sound like an amazing combo, thanks for sharing! definitely will check it out at some point :) already have been looking into the 556 for quite some time!

    • @jeromechu1532
      @jeromechu1532 26 днів тому

      What is AR?

  • @richardwhatley6505
    @richardwhatley6505 Рік тому +2

    Dont think its cutting corners with the ar coating, its just an aesthetic detail they chose to go with. I would actually have to see it in person to sse if it bothered me. Looking at a watch through lenses is not the same as looking at a watch with the naked eye.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому

      Totally agree with you, it is crucial to see it with the naked eye and make your own opinion. I for myself did not see it on the videos but when I got it it just did not made sense to me how reflective the crystal looked 😅

  • @karljohnson2864
    @karljohnson2864 Рік тому +4

    I'm just leaving a comment because you seem to be putting a lot into your channel and the content is high quality so I know that UA-cam will favor you more With more "interaction".

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому

      Thank you so much :) I really appreciate that!

  • @MountieHoo1105
    @MountieHoo1105 7 місяців тому +2

    Baltany makes Hamilton homages with a screw down crown with AR coating for about 26% of the price. It's a shame that Swatch Group treats Hamilton like an entry level stepchild. At this price point especially with what micro brands are doing AR coating and screw down crowns should be mandatory.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  7 місяців тому

      Amazing, thanks for the comment, I will definitely check it out.

  • @flavio2169
    @flavio2169 11 місяців тому +1

    I have the same thought about the cristal. It's almost likeva mirror that prevents you to appreciate the beautiful dial.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  11 місяців тому

      Hey, I appreciate your comment and am glad you think the same! The watch is super beautiful, so the crystal just is a huge bummer that does not make sense at all.

  • @tranimal72
    @tranimal72 Місяць тому +1

    I bought this today and u have some valid points but as a whole an awesome well made watch for the price.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Місяць тому

      agree with you and happy that you like the watch. tranks for the comment!

  • @randyanderson2285
    @randyanderson2285 Рік тому +6

    In the opinion the lack of an AR coating on the dial actually helps the overall look of the watch. While i makes it slightly harder to read, it also allows the light to play on the crystal and give it a nice shine.
    I dont find it difficult at all to read either. Because of how easily legible the dial is, the reduced legibility of the dial just lowers it down to being about average in bright light, and highly legible in normal light.
    I also disagree about the bracelet. Because while i agree about the clasp being chunky, and downright painful when typing, it’s definitely not a delicate bracelet at all.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому

      Hey Randy, thanks for your detailed feedback and opinion, I think you definitely have a point here and this really helps keeping the discussion going. The domed crystal absolutely makes the dial pop! As for the bracelet I felt that it was quite light and thin compared to my other watches.

    • @randyanderson2285
      @randyanderson2285 Рік тому

      @@mowatches lol I’m always down to talk about watches. Ultimately for the dial i think it depends on personal preference. I know this seems a little backwards but i tend to not like watches that have an AR coated crystal. When i had the Hamilton intra-matic auto chrono i thought the crystal always looks a bit dull since the light didn’t play on it very much. It definitely did help with legibility though.
      For the bracelet, yeah it’s more delicate than some sports watch bracelets but i think it’s about on par with other everyday watches. In terms of watches most people know about i think it’s about on par with the Omega Seamaster aqua terra.

  • @helixinred
    @helixinred 3 місяці тому +1

    still have the older version of this watch with the eta 2824-2 movement. (i personally prefer a higher beat rate movement to a longer power reserve movement like the current version) the reflection on the crystal does’t bother me much and i will keep mine for life.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  3 місяці тому

      Happy to hear that! Enjoy it to the fullest, this one is definitely meant to be worn.

  • @BlueGearReviews
    @BlueGearReviews Рік тому +2

    It is not subjective, it is fact. Even with their new 38mm Titanium, they still would Not put an inner AR coating at all (but the Murph has it).
    Common sense 'Hamilton' would dictate, you listen to the customers- Better Lume, AR coating & maybe a Screw down crown. It is Field Watch...for the outdoors!

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому

      Absolutely agree with you, they should definitely invest that money to make the most out of these already incredibly cool watches. Though I can also understand that some may not be bothered too much by the missing coating.

  • @HouseholdReviews
    @HouseholdReviews Місяць тому +1

    The lack of AR was a deal breaker for me as well when I held the watch in hand. Such a disappointment

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Місяць тому

      Happy to see that you thought the same. The watch looks so stunning and then the reflective crystal is a huge downer that does not match the overall quality of the watch at all. Thanks for the comment!

  • @trehsu
    @trehsu 3 місяці тому +2

    Yes, you're totally right. The sapphire crystal is so reflective it's annoying, and the clasp is too thick. Dead on. Still love it but I've tried to look into the aftermarket for solutions to both.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  3 місяці тому +1

      Appreciate your comment and agree absolutely 100%!

    • @Ww5789
      @Ww5789 3 місяці тому

      Why'd you leave yt ?

  • @doncowie8653
    @doncowie8653 Рік тому +1

    Rolex do not have AR coating and are difficult to get on a waiting list, what’s his beef with Hamilton not having it at this price.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому

      Thanks for the comment! Though my 200€ Sternglas has double AR coating and it can‘t be such a big cost factor.

  • @doctorikon
    @doctorikon 11 місяців тому +1

    Thank you for the great review. Anti-reflection is a big deal for me and almost spent a huge sum on Hamilton's titanium auto field watch.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  11 місяців тому +1

      Hey, thank you for the comment! Absolutely appreciate it and I am happy that it helped you!

  • @wt9622
    @wt9622 Рік тому +2

    How precise is the movement? How many seconds a day is it off?

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому +1

      It averages around +/- 7 seconds but could go as far as +/- 20.

  • @locustvalleystring
    @locustvalleystring Рік тому

    The reflection is rarely a problem for me, and when it is a little tilt of the wrist usually solves the issue. Love my 38.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому

      Thanks for the feedback and glad to hear that! It really is a cool watch, especially the 38mm :)

  • @jschoenzy9416
    @jschoenzy9416 24 дні тому +1

    Appreciate the honest review. The crystal has always been a deal breaker for me. I'm not usually fussy about crystals but the hamilton is like 40% mirror. Every real photo online shows the camera in the reflection. I stay clear of hamilton for that reason. Too bad, great watches otherwise.
    My Damasko crystal is nearly invisible the ar is so strong. Oris Aquis is another great watch with a terrible reflective crystal.
    Maybe I am fussy after all.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  24 дні тому

      Hey, thanks for your comment and happy to see that you feel the same. You are right it is a shame, because otherwise the watches really are amazing. Did not know this about the Aquis, too bad really. I really dont get why the watch makers try to save a few bucks here for watches beyond 500$

  • @jeromepaquet4233
    @jeromepaquet4233 Місяць тому +1

    I got mine for about two months.. selling it as well. I like the watch, but i dont find nothing special in it to keep it in my collection. 21000vph bothered me. I want something more smooth above 28000vph.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Місяць тому

      Happy to hear that you think the same! It really is an amazing watch but for me it also just did not click. Do you have something in mind already in order to replace it?

  • @andrewsarchus6036
    @andrewsarchus6036 Рік тому +3

    I actually like the reflective crystal. It makes it different and sets it apart from the herd. It also give me more confidence in its robustness and practicality as an everyday rugged field watch. Also just love that big old oversized pull-out crown. It's just there begging to be grabbed to give an extra wind whenever you like and simplicity itself for time/date adjust. The only problem is the prices have just taken a massive 30% hike and it's now almost $900 or £700 here in the UK!

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому +1

      I see and can totally understand your arguments as well. The prices are incredibly high now, but on pages like chrono24 you can usually still make a pretty good deal from some ADs in different countries when you watch the market a little beforehand.

    • @megaman2016
      @megaman2016 Рік тому

      Where is the best place to buy it in the UK?

    • @andrewsarchus6036
      @andrewsarchus6036 Рік тому

      @@megaman2016 I bought mine from H. Samuel jewelers. I wanted to try it on and just be in the zone so went for the full physical experience.

  • @korkmaztaylan
    @korkmaztaylan 20 днів тому +1

    Same here. I was about to pull the trigger for this beauty but after trying it at the local dealer, the reflections made me to quit buying it.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  20 днів тому +1

      Thanks for the comment, happy to see that you think the same way! Such a shame, it is a really cool watch otherwise

  • @sylversyrfer6894
    @sylversyrfer6894 Рік тому +1

    Is adding an aftermarket flat crystal with AR, or perhaps coating the stock domed Crystal with AR, possible? I know, it’s a hassle, but it’s otherwise a beautiful watch.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому

      People did it and I think its an amazing idea. I also thought about it but did but want to risk it

  • @schmidtythekidd
    @schmidtythekidd Рік тому +5

    I don’t know if I can trust the guy who has the eye of Sauron behind him during watch view.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому +1

      Sure thing as I was just about to destroy the ring once and for all.

  • @Gearsandco
    @Gearsandco Рік тому +1

    when it comes to the dial visibility, I totally agree with you I own the 38mm version of the khaki field automatic and I think it's a big letdown since I can't even enjoy the dial to the fullest, I would prefer a flat crystal or some reflective coating.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому

      Both could be a nice solution, you‘re absolutely right! Or maybe even both, I bet it would look amazing!

    • @Gearsandco
      @Gearsandco Рік тому

      @@mowatches I agree

  • @stephenmorgan336
    @stephenmorgan336 Рік тому +1

    I haven't been bothered by the lack of AR coating--I'm willing to just rotate my wrist a little more, I guess. I wear the watch all the time and generally like it a lot, but I agree that the chunky clasp is a problem. It really irritates me when I'm typing at work and my wrist is resting on the desk. I don't have to take off the other watch I wear to the office, but this one I do. Also, the lume is absurdly ineffective.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому

      Hey, thank you so much for your valuable insights! The lume is another good point to mention. Glad to hear though that you are generally happy with it :)

  • @YRG27
    @YRG27 4 місяці тому +1

    Thanks for your honest opinion and review yeah, the lack of decent anti-reflective coating is a dealbreaker.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  4 місяці тому

      thanks for your comment! appreciate it and happy to hear that you think the same. otherwise it’s a really cool watch!

  • @Gii1234
    @Gii1234 10 місяців тому +1

    Love this watch. I wish it had anti reflective coating, but the thing that bothers the most is the lack of screw down crown. It’s a tool watch should be able to take a swim with it. Super disappointing. If it had that I’d get it in a heartbeat.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  10 місяців тому

      Good observation and absolutely agree! Especially cuz its quite big, they could have made it screw down at least. Thanks for the comment!

  • @brynroberts9880
    @brynroberts9880 Рік тому +1

    Ive owned two 42mm on a strap. Ive never been a fan of this on the bracelet. I sold the second one so i could buy the murph 42mm. Generally Hamilton are one of my favourite brands.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому

      Murph is also a great one! And I really like the proportions of the 42mm, good choice!

  • @digirius
    @digirius 4 місяці тому +1

    Hi, anyone tried switching to different crystal?? There are plenty of variations of glasses, I wonder how it would look with flat sapphire with AR..

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  4 місяці тому

      really good question, for sure it would look amazing. There was a guy on youtube showing how its done and the results looked amazing, should be easy for you to find his video. also, at least here in germany, there are a few small companies that offer swapping the crystal as a service (costs were around 100$).

  • @zachg9065
    @zachg9065 Рік тому +1

    Yep. I had one and got rid of it due to the lack of AR. It’s a real shame

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому

      Yes, just a pity, otherwise it’s a great watch imho

  • @koberburwa
    @koberburwa 9 місяців тому +1

    A watch is an accessory, a piece of jewellery if you will, something you wear for looks. Yes, I want them to reflect light, because I like my jewelry shiny. If you want functionality buy a fucking smart watch mate

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  9 місяців тому

      I understand your argument but definitely disagree personally. In my opinion, if you want the swag and shininess, the watch case can be reflective as hell with polished aluminium etc, but when you cannot see the dial it just looks cheap, because it is cheap.

  • @thorinseex6176
    @thorinseex6176 Рік тому

    I’ve looked at ones in a shop , and when I think about - yes it is more reflective - but I don’t think overly so . Some of the alternatives mentioned - I haven’t heard of

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому +1

      I struggle with finding an alternative at a similar price point. There are nice field watches around but most of them are not an as decent package as the khaki field auto. The watches I mentioned were only meant as a reference for the reflectiveness of the crystal :)

    • @thorinseex6176
      @thorinseex6176 Рік тому

      I got a nice Glycine combat sub, direct from glycine (discontinued so on offer) and it's the most accurate auto watch I have ever come across . Gains 3 seconds a week@@mowatches

  • @Rlima0
    @Rlima0 6 місяців тому +1

    Which field watch did you buy? I mean did you replace this hamilton by another one? If so, which?
    Thanks!

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  5 місяців тому

      Hey there, sorry for the late reply. I did a lot of research and got an Rolex Explorer I in the end. Even though both watches play in completely different leagues and also have quite different dial styles, they have a very similar form factor, which I absolutely fell in love with wearing the Hamilton, which is why I then decided for the Explorer in the end. I am currently working on a comparison video between the two of them, maybe this could be interesting for you.

  • @gregrell2441
    @gregrell2441 3 місяці тому +5

    The reflective nature of this sapphire is one of the main reasons I bought this piece. It looks great, no regrets.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  3 місяці тому

      Happy to hear that!

  • @meoymeoy9405
    @meoymeoy9405 3 місяці тому +1

    Here is the problem; not the khaki field but the khaki field king(!) is considered to be one of the best watches at its price point due to its versatility and multiple complications as it has a day date complication instead of only a date like this normal field. The king also has a white tipped second hand making the watch way more versatile and therefor also more suitable in dressed up occasions.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  3 місяці тому

      Thanks for the hint :) really appreciate the comment. I will take a look at the king for sure.

  • @jordanJohnn
    @jordanJohnn Рік тому +2

    This AR coating seems to be a big deal for most people, are there after market options to fix this? ( not that you should have to with a watch at this price)

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому +2

      I found a local jeweler in Germany who offered to swap the crystal and the total service would have been 100€. Also there is a guy on youtube showcasing how he changed the crystal himself, but I was not confident enough to do it 😅

  • @ssr7261
    @ssr7261 5 місяців тому +1

    Thank you for this very informative video. By the way, what is the strap at 1:55?

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  5 місяців тому

      Happy to hear that it helped! I saw this strap first on another video from Bark & Jack and then found it at a dealer in Germany - here it was called "Nato Nylon Model Luxor green 20 mm", but you can also find it on alibaba and other online stores, as it seems to be a product from China that is resold / rebranded differently in every country. If you cannot it find in yours let me know and then I will try to help. :)

  • @marcetlori
    @marcetlori Рік тому +1

    I feel lucky you made this video and I ended up looking at it since the Hamilton Khaki Field was on my buylist. Before spending 900 $ cdn. I willthink twice.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому

      Thanks for the feedback and glad to hear that it was helpful!

  • @bigbenj97
    @bigbenj97 5 місяців тому +1

    i love my 38mm so much, the 80 hour power reserve is so underrated in my opinion!

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  5 місяців тому

      Hey man, glad to hear that! And I absolutely agree, the power reserve really is a killer feature. For me it is amazing that you can just leave your watch at home for a weekend getaway and still have it running on Monday.

  • @ajmarion
    @ajmarion 5 місяців тому +1

    Agree with you on the crystal, that’s my main complaint with the watch. Legibility is awful in certain scenarios. Otherwise I like the watch a lot

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  5 місяців тому

      Glad to hear you think the same. It really is a cool piece, hopefully Hamilton will fix this in the upcoming generations.

  • @JavierBonillaC
    @JavierBonillaC Рік тому +2

    The guy that bought the Camel says”hey this Camel is terrible. It doesn’t do any of the things you said he did”. The seller replies “shhh! If you keep saying that you’ll never sell the camel”.

  • @YakupCoskun024
    @YakupCoskun024 6 місяців тому +1

    Greetings, nice review. I want to ask this clearly. Is the only purpose of the AR coating for readability? Or does it protect sapphire glass from scratches?
    If Safire provides extra protection, this is an important issue. Otherwise, readability is not a problem for me.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  5 місяців тому +1

      Hey Yakup, thanks for your comment. The AR coating does not provide any additional protection but is solely for better readability. Some brands even apply an additional layer of it on the outside of the crystal (standard is to have it on the inside) which is by far not as scratch resistant as the crystal itself. So for you then this should not be any downside. Hope this helped.

    • @YakupCoskun024
      @YakupCoskun024 5 місяців тому +1

      @@mowatches Hello, I bought the watch and it's okay not to have AR coating, the watch is amazing 👍

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  5 місяців тому

      @@YakupCoskun024 congrats, happy to hear that!

  • @matthewconaway3510
    @matthewconaway3510 Рік тому +1

    Best movement you can buy for the money. I wore Seiko watches for years and will never go back after I can go weeks with this watch without resetting the time.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому

      True that, and with the open case back it is just beautifully featured! Value for money is absolutely unbeatable :)

  • @Brahmaso
    @Brahmaso Рік тому +2

    I love your nitpicking. Can you review the an ORIS Big Crown ProPilot?

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому +1

      Thanks :) I‘ll put it on the list!

  • @deanfox1951
    @deanfox1951 Рік тому +1

    What is a good alternative to this ?
    Price point but same style, don't think I would like the shine either.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому

      Thats a tough one. I‘ve been looking into the Sinn 556i, which is more price and no field watch, but has a similar overall appearance when it comes to the case and dimensions. Maybe you could also check out some other field watches.

  • @kam3410
    @kam3410 3 місяці тому

    Nice camera for 502 subscribers and nice production value!!! What cam are you using?

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  3 місяці тому

      thanks man, appreciate it. I just use a Canon EOS R, so definitely nothing special. What I can recommend is having the right light and also filming in Log and then using LUTs for enhanced flexibility in colour grading.

  • @chrisp.5272
    @chrisp.5272 Місяць тому +1

    I’m rocking a Casio Duro, Batman on a Stainless Bracelet from Long Island Watch. It’s not perfect, the watch is huge, the bracelet doesn’t fit perfectly, it’s decent, but overall it’s a damn good watch. It’s rocking a Miyota 2115 quartz movement with a three year power reserve, lol, and I can do my own maintenance, battery swap, some silicone grease applied to the gaskets and it’s good to go through an apocalypse. The Casio Duro is a beast, and fills the role I’d use a Hamilton Khaki for, for $110. 🤙🏼

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Місяць тому

      Love that. Really cool that you maintain it yourself. Appreciate your comment.

  • @pudongski
    @pudongski Рік тому +1

    I had this watch for less than a day because of that AR problem. I went back to shop to change it Hamilton Murph 38 and that was a good decision. I love the Murph 38. I just need to know if the videos’s stainless steel strap will fit to my Murph 38? Or do you guys know a stainless strap for Murph 38? Thanks

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому

      Unfortunately I have never held the Murph in my hands, but from pictures it looks stunning and it also sounds like it is an amazing alternative!

  • @offgrid8445
    @offgrid8445 6 місяців тому +1

    I have the 42mm version. Love the watch and its probably my most worn from a collection of twenty watches. Lack of AR is not a problem to me but I just wish it had a screw crown. 100 metres of water resistance is enough for most adventures but I can never really trust a push-pull crown and find myself checking its pushed in. Other than that, its a good GADA watch.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  5 місяців тому

      Hey there, thanks for your comment! It is the perfect everyday beater that you usually should be able to take on any adventure. A screw down crown would be the icing on the cake here, I definitely agree.

  • @normang663
    @normang663 Рік тому +4

    At first it did bother me but as i wear it day in and day out, i have come to appreciat wit because i can accidently bumped it and it’s still scratch free.
    In addition, just twist your wrist a bit and you cna see the time 😊

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому +1

      Glad to hear that! Some people also like the shininess of it.

  • @TeddyBoy7796
    @TeddyBoy7796 Рік тому +2

    Good review, the no AR coating is 100% a deal breaker for me, it would really annoy me big time, I love the watch and was thinking of buying but after now knowing that I simply cannot buy it, end of story, such a shame coz it’s a brilliant watch.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому +1

      I absolutely agree with you and am happy that the video helped. I was in the same place, pulled the trigger and then felt almost gaslighted because nobody really talked about this on UA-cam.

    • @Rick-ve5lx
      @Rick-ve5lx Рік тому

      I have one and it’s not that bad, much less annoying than sunburst dials.

  • @Romulus8
    @Romulus8 Рік тому +6

    Love this watch, guess it's all personal taste the things that may bother you don't bother me at all given the overall quality of this great watch.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому

      Hey, totally get why, it really is a cool piece! I guess when it comes down to some things it is just super subjective..

  • @saifklee178
    @saifklee178 6 місяців тому +1

    Just when I after months decided to buy this watch! Have never thought of AR coating before, and when I think about I have it on all my watches. Will be a deal breaker. Alright, back to scare one.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  5 місяців тому

      glad to hear the video helped. I also pulled the trigger and did not know about this and how severely it affected the looks of the dial as compared to my other watches.

  • @NorthernWatchClub
    @NorthernWatchClub Рік тому +1

    Hey great vid! great production quality too! I just made a video about the lack of AR on this watch as well it's an absolute bummer because the dial is quite beautiful

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому +1

      Hey there, thank you so much for the feedback - especially coming from somebody with such a cool watch channel it really means a lot to me! Checked out your video and I will definitely follow the upcoming content :)

    • @NorthernWatchClub
      @NorthernWatchClub Рік тому

      @@mowatches ❤️

  • @LatifssInspired
    @LatifssInspired Рік тому +2

    Mo some advice: once you are able to afford Pateks, APs, Rolexes, BlancPan like me you will learn that all watches have good and bad qualities! Doing a deep dive on a Hamilton is commendable but also so extra it’s cute. The real question is, have you made a video for the sake of a video?!

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому

      Hey, thanks for the comment :) I made the video because I got a completely unrealistic impression of the watch through the other videos out there, because I felt nobody was stressing these flaws enough. Certainly some UA-camrs will make videos just for the sake of uploading stuff but with this video I felt it was providing a significant benefit trying to point out what nobody criticized about this well made but also overhyped watch.

  • @Andy5kp
    @Andy5kp Рік тому +1

    Thanks for the video. I have the 42mm on leather and am contemplating selling it. I thought I would want to wear it all the time, but I don’t. I’ve just got a much cheaper seiko SRPG27. It’s not perfect either but find the dial less cluttered. The bracelet isn’t good but I’ll try it on a few natos and it could become my new daily

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому

      Thanks for the feedback and sharing your experience! Trying out some natos is definitely a good ans fun idea :)

  • @ludoludo4334
    @ludoludo4334 Рік тому

    If i want to buy this watch is it better to go for the bracelet? can we change the bracelet for a strap? or is it impossible to remove?

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому +1

      No it is fairly easy to remove the bracelet and change it for leather or nato straps. You can see the watch on some nato straps in the middle of the video roughly. I would recommend getting it on a metal bracelet and buying the other straps separately from the after market. Hope this helps!

    • @ludoludo4334
      @ludoludo4334 Рік тому

      @@mowatches thanks for your answer!

  • @rikleferink
    @rikleferink 7 місяців тому

    Ima take a guess and say the people that turn down the watch because of the lack of AR coating is vecause theyve already experienced how it could be With good AR coating.
    But like for me, as a first time watch buyer, wouldn't notice it at all, and it never bothered me

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  7 місяців тому

      Hey, thanks for your comment. I definitely agree that it might sound like nitpicking, but for the current price of the watch, AR coating is absolutely no premium feature in my opinion. There are many watches out there for half or a quarter of the price that have AR coating. However, there are many disciplines in which this watch does make an amazing job for its price, no questions asked, which is why it is so hard for me to understand why there is a lack of AR coating in the first place, if the rest is such an outstanding package.

  • @xenon9887
    @xenon9887 Рік тому

    Owned the 42mm version since 2015, I can tell you not once have I ever had issues reading the time. What a strange complaint, and even stranger reason to get rid of it.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому

      Thanks for the feedback! I guess it just comes down to personal preference. There are quite a few people here in the comment section that feel the same way. But of course I can get why it might not bother some people. Glad to hear that you are happy with the watch!

    • @TitoVicVGC
      @TitoVicVGC 5 місяців тому +1

      I went to 3 diferent shops to test the watch, and yes, it's like a mirror in all of them. I'm forcing to buy It but I can't for that reason.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  5 місяців тому +1

      @TitoVicVGC Glad to hear that I am not the only one being annoyed by this.

  • @JohnBuckmaster-sw3wm
    @JohnBuckmaster-sw3wm Рік тому +2

    You found more flaws than I did… I think the bracelet is extremely nice for the price… Quite possibly the most comfortable in my entire collection of over 70 watches. Yes, they are coding is nonexistent and disappointing, but I don’t find it as big as a flaw as the lack of lume. Even for a field watch, I find it one of the biggest drawbacks of the watch. I think the crown is the proper size for a field watch. And the clasp I also find great for a field watch… To refine these two things would just make it more of a dress watch.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому

      Hey John, thank you so much for sharing your valuable perspective and experience. Those are some very sharp observations and I think the fact that the watch wears the most comfortable from all of your collection is absolutely astonishing. The amazing comfort is something I totally forgot to meantion in the video. Hope to see you around here again someday :)

  • @jamesincharlotte
    @jamesincharlotte Рік тому

    Paid $380 for mine on sale at Jomashop 3 years ago. I have beat the crap out of this watch and still +4 a day !! Also the strapco rubber straps make this a monster !! The ones that fit Rolex !! The white one is my favorite.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому

      wow, that‘s really accurate! It’s a strap monster indeed and the white one also looks astonishing!

  • @S-Ltd1000
    @S-Ltd1000 Рік тому +4

    I bought a 38mm on a bracelet last year. At the £410 I paid I'm happy with it although the clasp is a little mismatched. Earlier this year however, Hamilton increased the RRP to around £700 and at that price I feel it's a bit much for what you get.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому +1

      Wow, that‘s a really good deal from todays perspective - when I got it, it was also almost 800€. But still a really cool watch, especially the slim 38mm version :)

  • @jipke
    @jipke Рік тому

    I have this watch and admittedly I am guilty too of moaning about the crystal, so I had the crystal replaced (exact same crystal bit with inner AR coating, then available from Crystal Times). Although the glare became noticably less strong, it was still clearly present.
    But here's the thing: I own three other black-dial watches, each with AR coating on both sides. The crystal basically disppears on them. But when I glance at my Hamilton, I immediately notice how interesting or even 'premium' the watch looks, precisely because of the glare. I now can see the charm of glary crystals (although, as said, it's not completely fair since I swapped out the crystal, but still).
    Having said all this, I don't wear the Hamilton that often anymore; that field-watch spot has been filled by the Longines Spirit. If I didn't own that one, though, I'd probably still be wearing the heck out of the Hamilton. At the end of the day it's a damn fine watch.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому +1

      Wow, thank you for your amazing insights and super valuable observations! It definitely is a cool watch and the fact that the reflective nature of the crystal boosts the “dressiness” of the watch has been discussed here also by other enthusiasts. A good point that I did not take into account. Hope to see you around again some time :)

  • @jonpaul3868
    @jonpaul3868 7 місяців тому +1

    I can understand the host problem with it. Reflective nature of it really hinder its function. Its a field watch, sometime you want just to see it at a glimpse. Let say when you ride a bike or car.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  7 місяців тому

      Absolutely, I really appreciate your comment!

  • @Sumerdini
    @Sumerdini Рік тому +2

    Lack of ARC is better IMO... Only real problem is the massive price hike...

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому

      Thanks for your comment :) True, prices went up like crazy!

  • @mannyfernandez1713
    @mannyfernandez1713 Рік тому +1

    Cool video dude, have you considered the seiko baby alpinist as an alternative to it?

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому +1

      Hey man, actually I did not have it on my radar so far. But it looks quite stunning with the triangles on the dial, almost giving me some seamaster aqua terra vibes :)

  • @malayneum
    @malayneum Рік тому

    how about the instellar ones? cooper one.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому

      Sorry, could you rephrase the question? I‘m afraid I did not get it 😅

    • @malayneum
      @malayneum Рік тому +1

      @@mowatches interstellar, a film starring matthew mconaughey. he wore an iconic hamilton khaki daydate pilot watch.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому +1

      Ah yeah, just checked it, how cool is that?! It is actually one of my most favorite movies. Also I saw that the khaki murph was as well in the movie - nice move hamilton 🔥

  • @yapolloable
    @yapolloable Рік тому +1

    i love the domed crystal but not the reflective nature of it, it does affect the viewing experience of the dial but not the time. But hey, I can playfully reflect light onto some kid in mcdonalds just to annoy them😂

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому

      You‘re like James Bond with his gadget watches 😎

  • @iron883cd
    @iron883cd Рік тому +1

    get a baltany only 130, and have antireflecting, black mini date, and screw down crown, and is 100mts

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому +1

      Nice, I‘ll check that one out for sure! Thanks for the comment :)

  • @JoelBradley05
    @JoelBradley05 Рік тому +1

    Lack of AR coating is the only reason I haven’t bought one

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому

      I can relate. Hopefully they will fix the crystal with the next update.

  • @bagzhansadvakassov1093
    @bagzhansadvakassov1093 4 місяці тому +1

    alternative?

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  4 місяці тому

      good question, there are many options! I am thinking of getting a longines spirit, or also IWC has cool field watches, like the portofino or the pilots watch. Also the seiko alpinist is a cool choice!

  • @JohnCannonBand
    @JohnCannonBand Рік тому +1

    Of course, they’re going to cut some corners at that price range. Maybe they should offer amother version at a higher price

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому +1

      I definitely would be in for that :)

  • @evandh1989
    @evandh1989 23 дні тому

    Honestly, what irks me about this watch is that the day cutout bumps the 15-second mark out of place. It’s even worse on the 42mm. Very little needed to be done to correct this (frankly, they should have just omitted the 15 from the 42mm), and idk why Hamilton did nothing about it.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  21 день тому

      good question and I did not know that this was even worse for the bigger version of it. Thanks for the comment!

  • @guilhermepetti
    @guilhermepetti 7 місяців тому +1

    Good point! 🤔

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  7 місяців тому

      Thanks for the feedback :)

  • @tomalophicon
    @tomalophicon 11 місяців тому +2

    Would be cheap and easy to replace the crystal.

  • @JGDG_K
    @JGDG_K Рік тому +1

    Does that 'selling' mean that you recommend here?

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому

      I‘m presenting the personal reasons why I am parting ways with the Hamilton Khaki Field Auto. Yet it remains a really cool watch for the price and if the things I mentioned in the video do not bother you, I would even recommend it, yes!

    • @JGDG_K
      @JGDG_K Рік тому

      @@mowatches oh! Actually I am learning english. At first when I saw your title, I understood that you have some disappointing part about this whatch or something lol thank you for your comment :)

    • @JGDG_K
      @JGDG_K Рік тому

      So my question was about grammar and real meaning, usage about the word 'sell'.

    • @JGDG_K
      @JGDG_K Рік тому +1

      and I love Hamilton khaki field 38mm too! I'm buying soon :)

  • @del0373
    @del0373 Рік тому +1

    I got the watch. Opened the box and saw all the reflections in the crystal. I screens smashed it with a hammer and threw it away.

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  Рік тому

      Absolutely reasonable reaction. I almost sued Hamilton when I opened my box. Love your comment!

    • @elim7228
      @elim7228 11 місяців тому +1

      😂😂😂 your reflection made you so mad?

    • @mowatches
      @mowatches  11 місяців тому

      @@elim7228 just kidding but yes, I did not expect that at all, which led me to making this video to prevent others from having the same surprise :D

  • @AB-lx8cf
    @AB-lx8cf 11 днів тому +1

    Someone should just make a non reflective solution for post purchase. If the watch company can’t get it right, why lose out on a great watch because of that? Imagine a cream of polish you can put as an anti glare layer? I mean is it so hard to make? If you read this and do, I want cash in form of royalties lol

  • @Othusdragonreviews
    @Othusdragonreviews Рік тому

    swap the crystal for one with AR?