Dividing a line segment into equal parts (Thales theorem)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 лис 2015
  • This shows how to divide a given line segment into a number of equal parts with compass and a set-square aplying Thales theorem.
    Make a Donation: www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr...
    This UA-cam channel is dedicated to teaching people how to improve their technical drawing skills. It focusses on drawing figures from the geometric plane to descriptive geometry and also different systems of technical drawing representation.
    If you subscribe, click, like or leave a comment you will be helping us to grow our channel and help more people with their technical drawing skills.
    Thank you in advance.
    Dubbed by Frank Shaw.
    Music by Antonio Fernández Ruiz. antoniofernandez.es/
    #Geometry #HowtoDraw

КОМЕНТАРІ • 69

  • @smileyface4557
    @smileyface4557 5 років тому +25

    Thank you so much. This is exactly what I was looking for.

  • @sheldonjefferson6515
    @sheldonjefferson6515 5 років тому +6

    You are a lifesaver thank you for helping me with my geometry homework

  • @GREGGRCO
    @GREGGRCO 3 роки тому +3

    Thanks !! 38 years later had to look this up !!
    I was close !
    Thanks again, nice computer graphics (CAD) program,
    like working on a drafting table again.

    • @Theboy1gwe
      @Theboy1gwe 2 місяці тому

      Curious...
      It came up during your work?

  • @RishabNakarmi
    @RishabNakarmi 5 років тому +5

    Very helpful. Just what I needed. Thank you.

  • @michaelkearney5616
    @michaelkearney5616 Рік тому +2

    Thanks, needed to know this

  • @sergiorodriguez5865
    @sergiorodriguez5865 5 років тому +3

    Thanks, you are the best teacher.

  • @radharaman3337
    @radharaman3337 3 роки тому +3

    This is exact and clear way and very easy and beautiful

  • @DarkonXBL
    @DarkonXBL 4 роки тому +1

    Your videos are so helpful. Thanks 🤘

  • @rishisolanki9135
    @rishisolanki9135 8 років тому +5

    Ur videos are very helpful but they don't run much ...Sir if u make more videos of technical drawing makings... I'd be greatful to you

  • @ridhimasharma1182
    @ridhimasharma1182 3 роки тому +2

    Thanks so much 🥰🥰 may god bless you 🥰🥰

  • @zelinzzl
    @zelinzzl 5 років тому +3

    Thank you sm, completed my hw like my was nothing💪💪💪will sub and like

  • @journeywithin6274
    @journeywithin6274 4 роки тому +1

    Brilliant! Thanks!

  • @Mashaandbear122
    @Mashaandbear122 10 місяців тому +1

    Thankss! I needed that for one of my exam..... u explained well.

  • @saravanana7545
    @saravanana7545 2 роки тому +3

    Sir, I tried by drawing parallel lines after drawing two end points of intial line. There will somewhat slight variations in adjesant division.

  • @bhagyalakshmirajesh9340
    @bhagyalakshmirajesh9340 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you. This is what I was looking for.

  • @juganous2267
    @juganous2267 2 роки тому +1

    this really helped me alot thank you!

  • @rukungacharles9572
    @rukungacharles9572 Рік тому +1

    Good work

  • @oliverbrennan3345
    @oliverbrennan3345 2 роки тому +1

    That was exactly what I was looking for

  • @syedaariaashfaque7196
    @syedaariaashfaque7196 5 років тому +1

    Thank u . Keep it up

  • @rebeccaxx8185
    @rebeccaxx8185 4 роки тому +2

    thank you so much 💞

  • @airmaxy7377
    @airmaxy7377 2 роки тому +1

    you made geometry so easy for me from a tenth grader

  • @mohanbarman1685
    @mohanbarman1685 3 роки тому +1

    Very helpful 👍👍

  • @latrelmcdonald7623
    @latrelmcdonald7623 3 роки тому

    U would make a good teacher 👍

  • @fatmasartbox8925
    @fatmasartbox8925 4 роки тому +1

    It was very helpful

  • @hannesroos7
    @hannesroos7 2 роки тому +1

    Thanks for the help

  • @saruultsend-ayush5640
    @saruultsend-ayush5640 3 роки тому +5

    I've got a question, what's the practical use of the Thales theorem? Can't I just divide the original line by using a ruler and dividing the length by the number of segments I want?

    • @endie5970
      @endie5970 3 роки тому

      Making polygons, i think

    • @mjcard
      @mjcard 3 роки тому +1

      It’s easier and more accurate this way in certain applications.

  • @boyanulislam7968
    @boyanulislam7968 3 роки тому +2

    I love you ❣️ Bro 😘

  • @sachinpawar6339
    @sachinpawar6339 7 років тому

    is there any method to divide a line into 3 equal parts using divider

  • @drurychannel
    @drurychannel 3 роки тому +1

    This videos are very important

  • @chisaomusician7752
    @chisaomusician7752 3 роки тому +2

    Also called Intercept theorem, not to be confused with Thales other theorem.

  • @moinuddinhabib9420
    @moinuddinhabib9420 5 років тому +1

    Sir if we have to divide a line segment of 5.7 cm into 3 equal parts so we should take the measurements of compass at what cm

    • @TheAndreArtus
      @TheAndreArtus 4 роки тому +1

      It should not make a difference. Normally you choose a length that is easy to measure if you are using a measuring stick, but so long as you use 3 equal measures you should be fine. See it as creating overlapping similar triangles (all corresponding angles are the same) so the ratios of the side lengths will also remain the same.
      To convince yourself of this you may wish to try the following:
      1. Draw a segment AB that you can divide into 9 equal parts (9cm or 9 inches, does not matter).
      2. Number the division points D1 through D8 (A would be 0, B would be 9).
      3. Draw another segment AC, of arbitrary length, let's use 5.7 (cm or inches) that sits adjacent to AB at an angle (exact degrees not important so long as its not 0 or 180, eyeball something from 30 to 45 degrees ).
      4. Join B and C with a red coloured line (BC) to make a triangle.
      5. Draw lines parallel to BC through points D3 and D6, you should have 3 divisions on AC.
      6. Take a different colour, say blue, and join point D6 with point C, with the same colour draw parallel lines through D2 and D4, they should intersect AC the same points as the previously drawn red lines.
      7. You can do the same thing with another colour, this time using point 3 as the new triangle (ACD_3).
      Regardless how long or short AB is (in relation to AC), any point on AB will divide AC by the same ratio (on angles not 0 or 180).
      You can even use a theorem (diagonals of trapezoids theorem) related to this one (basic proportionality theorem) to divide the space between two parallel lines by whatever ratios you desire.

  • @mydailylifeshohana5145
    @mydailylifeshohana5145 4 роки тому +1

    thank you..

  • @rapemaxxing788
    @rapemaxxing788 3 роки тому +2

    Thankyou soooooooooo much

  • @atila8623
    @atila8623 8 місяців тому +1

    Super cool

  • @HomerKing89
    @HomerKing89 3 місяці тому +1

    Currently watching this the day before the final exam😁

  • @michaellorde5853
    @michaellorde5853 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you

  • @charlesifeanyi3576
    @charlesifeanyi3576 2 роки тому +1

    Nice

  • @justmath9216
    @justmath9216 4 роки тому +15

    I realize this is a "how to draw" video, but the video misses the mathematical point completely: The mathematical point is to be able to divide an arbitrary-length line-segment AB into N equally long segments using ONLY a compass and a straight edge. Such a proper construction relies on first creating an arbitrary triangle ABC and then constructing N-1 additional smaller but similar triangles whose lower-right corners are at the segment boundaries. The construction of the smaller triangles can be performed by an initial compass-only copy-angle operation, followed by N-2 compass-only copy-length operations, or you can use N-1 compass-only copy-angle operations.
    There should be no use of other measurement-generating or angle-generating tools (ruler, angle-protractor, set-squares). Hence, setting the compass to a specific 2cm gap is superfluous and confusing. And using an angle protractor as a ruler instead of a dimensionless straightedge is likewise confusing and superfluous. Then there is the operation of constructing the parallell lines, which should be performed via copying the angle ABC at the A-to-C intermediate and equidistant waypoints, and not via the computer calculating a parallel translation of the CB segment, nor by by using "set-squares" tools, which the narrative says.
    Oh, and Thales Theorem is not at all required for this construction. Which is why I got started on picking apart this video and separating drawing technique shortcuts from the mathematics. I was looking for a video about Thales Theorem and landed here.

    • @dsmthiccman
      @dsmthiccman 4 роки тому +3

      justmath how can you be bothered to write a comment that long when you know that nobody will read that because of how long it is and no I haven’t read it

    • @provocativepolitic
      @provocativepolitic 4 роки тому +2

      i knew something wasnt right

  • @thecircusboy8856
    @thecircusboy8856 5 місяців тому +1

    I mean thats nice that you have a tool that stays parallel to precious lines. But the crux of the problem is that a human is going to be moving this tool and how you can maintain parallel with just a strait edge compass and your hands

    • @ArthurGeometry
      @ArthurGeometry  5 місяців тому

      ua-cam.com/video/C-Wu7gOSpHM/v-deo.html

  • @kapilbhardwaj4934
    @kapilbhardwaj4934 5 років тому +1

    THANKYOU UA-cam

  • @QueenMeat
    @QueenMeat 4 роки тому +1

    I love you

  • @kousarkousar8427
    @kousarkousar8427 2 роки тому +1

    Nice vi2

  • @franzcharlery4052
    @franzcharlery4052 7 років тому +19

    When you started dont use the circle that conflused me

  • @spoofer9113
    @spoofer9113 3 роки тому +1

    Wait.. How would we know that it is exactly fivided because we are randomly moving that set square upto some distance 🙄

  • @kavitagupta2072
    @kavitagupta2072 11 місяців тому +1

    😊😮

  • @amandaokeke587
    @amandaokeke587 Рік тому +1

    If you are dividing a line into 8 equal parts , do you use the same method ?

  • @tasneemkauser5813
    @tasneemkauser5813 3 роки тому

    Arthur u tried in the end u did

  • @dsmthiccman
    @dsmthiccman 4 роки тому +1

    Graphics homework like this comment if it’s the same for you as well

  • @preetinaikwadi330
    @preetinaikwadi330 5 років тому +2

    dont use circle please because its became difficult to understand

  • @boyanulislam7968
    @boyanulislam7968 3 роки тому +1

    What is your name?

  • @happyhome41
    @happyhome41 Рік тому

    Not clear at all how you achieve parallel lines after the first one. And what is the marking of the lines at the end "showing they are parallel" ? Missing too much here to be useful.

  • @withluvsia
    @withluvsia 4 роки тому

    4 line tu de

  • @vvkhari1
    @vvkhari1 6 років тому +2

    What r u saying mate? So Thales knew set square, protractor in 3rd century BCE...first tell the statement, then interpretation of the statement and proof as given by Thales...I guess no one in here is better than Thales...this way of education is just stupidity....!!

  • @iyioluwabanji-baruwa458
    @iyioluwabanji-baruwa458 3 роки тому

    tehe

  • @Fotomanafrica
    @Fotomanafrica 4 роки тому +2

    I searched for this question and how to do it in Adobe Illustrator. How come your key wording includes that? Thank you for wasting my time.

  • @l.y.manjula5226
    @l.y.manjula5226 3 роки тому

    guys who are from mvsr

  • @shahzadislahi2714
    @shahzadislahi2714 5 років тому

    Urdu nahi ati

  • @ifeomaobiamalu2796
    @ifeomaobiamalu2796 4 роки тому

    I don`t really understand .

  • @ot9180
    @ot9180 4 роки тому

    This is not a good way, you can’t really control parallelism. This is questionable use Thales theorem while the theorem is correct

    • @marwanhallak9341
      @marwanhallak9341 4 роки тому +2

      Kumuk 99 use two set square and you do it properly 👍