Up/down movement when running is not what it looks like

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 лип 2023
  • After seeing yet another post on social media about how runners should strive to move as little as possible up and down and as "proof" published a film of an elite runner where a line is drawn at the runner's head where it looks like it moves very little in height, I thought I would now clarify how it works. How much your head moves up and down when you run is not an indication of how much you move up and down. Of course, it depends on what we mean by 'you'. What costs energy is how much you move your centre of mass when you run. This is NOT the same as head movements as the position of your centre of mass can shift depending on how you move your arms and legs. Also - if you think your nice running watch you have that shows vertical oscillation is correct, you are wrong. Welcome to another video where I complicate things you thought were simple when it comes to energy efficient running technique.
    ___________________________________________________
    Fredrik Zillén is an running technique specialist that has over the years helped thousands of runners to a more efficient running technique - from the slowest beginners to members of the Swedish national team in running and triathlon who have participated in the World Championships and the Olympics. Fredrik also writes articles on effective running technique for Runner's World magazine.
    Following the success of Fredrik Zilléns online course in Swedish, he has also produced an updated and improved version in English. You can find it here: www.fredrikzillen.com
    You find the Swedish version at: www.fredrikzillenonline.se
    "Fantastic running course. Fredrik is an excellent teacher with a unique approach. I highly recommend this course to runners of all levels."
    Kevin, UK
    "The best money I have ever spent. Great mix of humour, practical technique and theory. It’s brilliant and I have been telling all my friends about it. I’ve knocked 30 secs off my average pace to 4:30 and at 53 I’m absolutely astonished how relaxed I feel running. It’s also really helped my cycling my adapting similar techniques and visualisation. Thanks so much."
    Paul, UK
    "I knew nothing about running other than put one foot forward in front of the other...and fast. Then I signed up for his course. Mind blowing!... and too cheap if you ask me. Totally recommend it."
    Runner
    Read more testimonials here: fredrikzillenonline.newzenler...
    The course in English: fredrikzillenonline.newzenler...
    The course in Swedish: www.fredrikzillenonline.se
  • Спорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 22

  • @yenge5434
    @yenge5434 5 днів тому

    Being a physics nerd, I love Frederik's videos! Thank you. I just wish he added one more point here: how much the center of mass moves basically 100% depends on air-time between steps, which is pretty much controlled by cadence. It's laws of physics if you spend 1 second mid-air your center of mass is going to move that much. High cadence reduces air time between steps because steps are shorter

  • @karinaniskanen1386
    @karinaniskanen1386 Рік тому +5

    Thank you very much for complicating things! 😄

  • @prentishancockgardening
    @prentishancockgardening Рік тому +1

    Another great video Fredrik. I agree with you on this one.

  • @lornadoell
    @lornadoell Рік тому

    Thanks for the videos. I'm learning a lot. I can usually understand the theory, but find it harder to translate it into correct movement. Your teaching style seems to suit my brain, and body. Thanks again.

  • @CSRunner7
    @CSRunner7 2 місяці тому +1

    Thanks for this. So much un researched nonsense put out on social media by running influencers!

  • @herbertbay
    @herbertbay Рік тому +4

    Love your videos, thanks so much. Very insightful. I would wish for some instructions on how to reduce oscillation of the center of gravity. What to do to improve my running with less oscillation.

  • @jonb9194
    @jonb9194 11 місяців тому

    It's about finding the right combination of ground time and air time to match the strengths of each runner, and adjusting the amount of "lope" during ground contact (stance phase). Every runner follows the same ballistic trajectory during the flight phase, regardless of weight.

  • @kjlkathandjohn6061
    @kjlkathandjohn6061 11 місяців тому

    Lowest down position happens at the conclusion of shock absorption with ankle, knee, and hip joints. Here "leg length" is in a collapsed state, with these three joints flexed.
    As grounded foot and leg pass to rearward, the three joints become straightened, thus lengthening the leg and with sufficient recoil to lift the falling torso up again and forward before it is retracted from ground position.
    Jointed leg length changes while foot is on the ground.

  • @IainThacker
    @IainThacker Рік тому +5

    Hej, Fedrik! With your ability to measure CoM movement with your equipment, have you tried to see how accurate consumer devices are at estimating vertical oscillation? Even if they're accurate, I suspect that most of us haven't got a clue what would be a "good" vertical movement or, probably more useful, ratio.

    • @suehirogaribright
      @suehirogaribright Рік тому +1

      I'm also curious how good/badly correlated the oscillation measured by those straps and the real figure

  • @colmrooney414
    @colmrooney414 11 місяців тому

    since not much instruction given on how I have a couple ideas: focus on timing so head over toe then switch from glute/hip & quad push off, when "pushing off" too much with knee also done in stair climing and standing up, excessive (up/down) force gets utilised. the david weck method is also helpful, to figure 8 the shoulders (back) and connect the lats and coil the side abs, bringing shoulder to hip on one side then the other. while keeping the arch of foot strong and not allowing knee/ankle to collapse in (a common habit) when runners have hands in front it seems to coil/uncoil like yin/yang in tai qi one hand pushes the other pulls. try to wear barefoot shoes or none and this will strengthen the arch and land outer edge (where naturally the foot touches earth first)

  • @thibod07
    @thibod07 11 місяців тому

    This is hilarious! I Never though of those aspects of running! I cannot really argue about it’s veracity! I am not that smart! My question is how can I benefit from that knowledge when I run?

  • @Yurkevich22
    @Yurkevich22 11 місяців тому +2

    great explanation but what about any actionable tips on what we should be doing to reduce the center of mass movement?

    • @paulnorman8274
      @paulnorman8274 9 місяців тому

      To reduce COM amplitude, increase cadence. A bouncing ball is a decent enough model: The bounce cadence is faster, when it bounces less high. You probably can deviate from that with some strange contortions during ground contact time, but in general, the bouncing ball model of running is not too far off.

  • @liamroche1473
    @liamroche1473 11 місяців тому

    The only thing I can be pretty sure of is that the centre of mass moves in close to a parabola when there is not a foot on the ground. That does not even determine the height the centre of mass rises (because there is no guarantee the high point of the flight is exactly in the middle of flight time. Oh, also we can be sure that the average vertical speed is zero on the flat.

  • @martinrosschou
    @martinrosschou 2 місяці тому

    Is there a way to try and "feel" how much I'm moving my center of mass?
    Like clear sign that it is moving up and down to much for example

  • @henri-5606
    @henri-5606 10 місяців тому

    And sooooooo *what* should we do then please Fredrik?

  • @shelbyatracing
    @shelbyatracing Рік тому

    Therefore STRYD exists, and calculates many more parameters with precision. Have just taken a look, on today's easy run STRYD - 8,51 cm of vert osc., Garmin hrm-pro 9,4 cm. Last Marathon race STRYD 8,37cm, Hrm-pro 7,9 cm.

    • @reeltaiwan
      @reeltaiwan Рік тому +2

      But how does a footpod know where your center of gravity is? At least the HRM PRO is closer to your center of gravity than your foot ;-)

    • @shelbyatracing
      @shelbyatracing Рік тому

      @@reeltaiwan We should look at center of mass not center of gravity (it is not exactly the same). Stryd calculations were validated with high resolution motion capture systems, dual force plate treadmill, and metabolic testing. More than that, Stryd singles out vertical work rate done (in place) - power required to displace the center of mass vertically without considering forward movement. HRM Pro is reported to produce much "noisier" data as opposed to Stryd exactly because it is far from foot. And one interesting thing - some studies show that low vertical oscillations are correlated with better running economy (lower metabolic cost) while some studies show the exact opposite (higher metabolic cost).

    • @reeltaiwan
      @reeltaiwan Рік тому +1

      @@shelbyatracing I'm putting more weight (mass?) on your last assertion than on the validation part. I can see that if the Stryd user provides details on his/her weight/height/limb/torso/abdomen measurements, etc., then algorithms could do a good job of estimating vertical oscillation...But at the end of the day, I don't put much faith in vertical oscillation, partly because I'd think it was job done if I look at my HRM-Pro stats (6% oscillation when I'm easy shuffling and

  • @itzzitzz
    @itzzitzz 11 місяців тому

    Hilarious sense of humour 😂