I hope you enjoyed the video, if you did, please give it a like! 😁 *** In this incident, Titan Airways flight 305 was an A321, but an a320 is used to simulate it in this video. This is because the A320 model provides a higher quality model.
Much appreciate your time and resources in crafting this mini documentaries with such good production values. And double thanks for covering incidents, anecdotes which hardly anyone else covers. . This one was indeed something that leaves one fuming with varied emotions. . If you need any advice or help ever in adding subtitles to your documentaries in any South Asian, Indian languages.. I would feel humbled to assist.
Just found your channel and I love the way you present your content. I'm a lifelong aviation geek from a family of aviators. I love the way you did your editing, it was presented so smartly and was excellent information. Who would have thought filming lighting could do that 🤷♀️
What a story! As someone that worked aircraft maintenance for many years, (retired) and changed out countless interior panes for cosmetic purposes, I never encountered melting of any type. Window shade warping is a common occurrence, but this is such a rarity. Those must have been some intense lights. Bravo to the crew for their quick and professional actions.
Definitely one of the more bizarre stories in aviation! There’s another strange incident over the Caribbean when American Airlines 901 went into a dive, when the first officer seat moved forward and legs, which were crossed, pushed the control yoke, there is more to this story and it’s pretty interesting. This is the date for the incident: Wednesday 29 June 1994. Would be cool to see it covered on UA-cam!
I’ll take a look, thank you. I’m always on the search for more obscure or unknown incidents. I try to bring fresh stories to this amazing audience. Thank you for the suggestion.
Brilliant video! Thank you. I was trying to figure out what could have caused the windows to fall out! It was not what I was expecting. So much happens in the aviation industry everyday, it’s crazy to see stories like this. Thank you for bringing it to us.
A few minutes ago, I was watching the news on TV. Heard that the whole fleet of Boeing B-737 MAX 9 has been grounded for inspection after one of them lost a window and part of the fuselage little after takeoff in Alaska.
@@CuriousPilot90very lucky. It was a deactivated emergency exit. They said a little boy had his shirt ripped off. If his mother was not holding onto him he would have been pulled out. The max has not done Boeing any favors since it's inception.
I'm from KICT, where a lot of Boeing fuselages and engine nacelles are made [along with the far less embattled Textron and Learjet] - this kind of news always sucks for the local economy. I'm thinking that Boeing needs to have a good purge and start developing a culture where they encourage people to identify problems and reward it, as well as rewarding the safety-improving solution. You can't keep cramming stuff into a 737 to avoid creating a new variant for which training would be mandated without compromising what otherwise is the Honda Civic of airplanes... ubiquitous and reliable. Their safety culture has sucked since they merged with McDonnell Douglas.
Oddly something similar happened to TWA at LAX following filming of a commercial. The bad windows were found during dehangering inspection. There also was scorched paint. The filming lights get quite hot.
That was absolutely mindblowing. Who would believe that set lighting could cause any damage, let alone a substantial one, to a modern aircraft. This could have indeed turned out completely differently, if it wasn't for the awareness of the loadmaster and the immediate actions by the crew. Now, I understand that the damage was not as apparent prior to the flight compared to how it was after landing, and yet, as I understand it, there was a clear physical evidence for damage on at least on one window. I wonder how something like this can be overlooked on a walk around during daylight, and especially in such a chill environment. And then, you would also expect the cabin crew who prepared the cabin, to have noticed something so off. So I am left with more than one answered question. Were there any safety recommendations by the AAIB due to this?
Because it wasn’t picked up during the walk around, it could be assumed that the windows came loose during the taxi, flight and landing (the horizontal stabiliser being hit by one of the windows suggests one fell out during the flight) The other shattered one on the exit taxiway could suggest it fell off after the landing. For safety recommendations, there were none of yet apart from to be aware of the issue. I think once they conclude how the lights caused the damage, whether it was due to them being too close or if they generate too much heat even at a further distance. Then more preventative measures will be issued.
@@CuriousPilot90 As I mentioned above the same thing happened about 25 years ago to TWA. There should be some precautions before high temperature filming lights are shined through windows. Also cold cabin is an indication of cabin leakage or bad trim air heat flow. Above 15000 feet the cabin must be heated.. an aircraft with a leak or bad trim air can not cruse above 25000 feet for long.
This is such a unique incident! Very strange. It highlights the need for careful planning and attention to detail when using an aircraft for an uncommon purpose like this. Doing inspection/maintenance AFTERWARD probably would have been a good idea as well.
I have a video about an incident (or set of incidents) known as ‘Black Christmas’ I think you’ll find that one interesting too! Hopefully another incident you haven’t heard of.
How shocking! As you alluded to, plane makers have produced windows for decades, probably improving continuously, but this event which might seem to laymen such as I, “within acceptable perimeters” could induce catastrophic failure 😳👏👍👌
The fact, that the fuselage was painted dark hence there was limited light deflection didn't help either. I guess this could further contribute to the damage
Hard to say - I don't think that could be easily quantified. The fuselage may have transferred some heat to the window frames but it was the plastic reaching its critical temperature that caused the failure. And clearly the light manufacturer knew they delivered a lot of heat!
Had the window defect not been detected and it failed in the middle of the Atlantic, finding an alternate airport within range at the safe, lower, altitude and therefore much higher fuel burn, could have made this far more fraught.
Exactly! It’s so unusual to hear of a story like this one. Their oxygen masks wouldn’t last long enough for the diversion. They would have to fly there below 10,000. At least it would be a little warmer…
very interesting. makes me wonder if the lights where using factory standard bulbs or if they'd been 'beefed up'. great vid anyway. never heard of this before.
With the incident happening so recently, it doesn’t look to be concluded in that sense. I’m sure it would be a long legal issue to prove that the floodlights used beyond 10 m would be safe to use. If not, the flood light manufacturer could be liable, whereas with the dataset warning from them, the studio could be liable. If it is published, I’ll be sure to add it to a community post. :)
It likely will just go through insurance and that will be the end of it. Likely the airline and production company coming to an agreement. The total monetary loss is not that great, unless the stab is damaged by the window impact.
@@DWBurns Several sets of window would be incredibly expensive. Airplane parts are worth more than gold. The labor to install them, not as much as what you pay for your car to be worked on...
Thats a beautiful black plane. Do we have at least an approximation of the temperature the flood lights were giving off? What is the failure temperature of the seal?
The aircraft model used is an A320 neo. The exact model of aircraft in the incident was an A321. The reason for the use of the A320 is because the simulator model provides better quality.
Boeing likely wishes the recent blowout of an Alaskan Air 737 wall panel had a similar cause. Luckily both this incident and the 737 incident resulted in no injuries or fatalities.
How is it that the minimum distance for illumination is 10m, but for flammable objects it's 1.5m? Surely that should be the other way round. Or am I missing something?
What most people don't realise is that plastic products...including composite laminating resins....have a Tg (glass transition temperature where the resin starts to soften). This temperature can be as low as 85°C...easily achievable under direct summer sunshine. This is the reason why most modern planes and composite structured gliders and yachts are painted white or a light colour.
The lighting equipment used by film crews tequires a lot of knowledge; some setups throw off a _lot_ of heat. I learned that from being at the receiving end while emceeing a stage show. I picked up a leather flogger that had brass studs in the grip and got nice round burns in the palm of my hand. The gaffer's new assistant had used the wrong spotlight on it and the heat was far in excess of what was appropriate. Explaining the resulting burns to my straight job was a treat. In any case, I can easily see polymer windows being compromised even from 10 meters.
@@oboealto Thank you. They took about six weeks all told until my hand was back to mostly normal function. The docs rated it as second degree with two "buttons" at very minor bits of third. Part of it was my fault, as I created an extemporaneous scene in order to let the tool cool before I finally handed it off to the headline top and got offstage to have them cooled at treated. The headline read it and played along and I was able to convey with faceaway talk what was going on so he wasn't burned at all. He switched up, threw the flogger away and subbed a different implement.
My father once melted the left rear light on his car with a floodlight while working on the back mounted engine. It didn't ever happened to him again. I'd expect more from a professional team doing that job every day...
Just yesterday, an Alaska Airlines 737 Max9 lost a door panel/window (apparently not in use in this configuration for Alaska Airlines) resulting in sudden depressurization. Thankfully no one was seriously injured in this incident either. A large part of the fleet has been grounded. Is this becoming a more common problem? Thanks for your video, I remember seeing the report on the news last year of this incident. Hard to believe movie-set lights can do so much damage.
I have been traveling my entire life (on airplanes 90% of the time), and I have NEVER EVER sat next to a door!. I have ALWAYS booked a seat and sat just behind the wing and always in an aisle seat... just sayin'... Happy new year everyone.
I'm 6'5" and always pick the aisle just so I can stick a leg out in the aisle when they aren't serving :) I don't fear the doors or windows - the odds of one failing are worse than a lottery win.
Great thank you. The hardest part at the moment is finding the time to get these videos made! But the balance is working for now. 😁 If you don’t mind sharing, what do you do for a living?
@@CuriousPilot90 no not yet, but I’ve been thinking that I should do an apprenticeship in the RAF first, and then after my 3 year contact, join as a pilot.
yes, a much nicer plane. black is ver good at gaining ifrafed that's why fewer planes use it...i guess. the japan air crash, was a neo 350 it just turned to ash with comparatively small 'burn'. compared to the explosive burn of the coast guard plane... the new planes can have huge feul economies as well.@@CuriousPilot90
A Titan Airways Airbus A321-200N, registration G-OATW performing flight AWC-305Y from London Stansted,EN (UK) to Orlando,FL (USA) with 21 crew, was climbing through about 10,000 feet out of Stansted's runway 22 when the crew noticed excessive noise in the cabin, stopped the climb at about FL150 and returned to Stansted for a safe landing on runway 22 about 37 minutes after departure. The British AAIB reported it was discovered three cabin windows were missing or loose, there was also damage to the left hand stabilizer, the aircraft sustained substantial damage. The occurrence was rated an accident and is being investigated by the AAIB. Airbus not robust.
@@kickedinthecalfbyacow7549 I’m saying I’ve watched at least 100+ hours of plane crash/ malfunction videos over the years and planes are not at all as safe as they’re made out to be…
@@JosephSeabourne Cars are definitely the #1 most dangerous means of transportation without a doubt, but I’d argue planes are #2 on that ranking. I’m beginning to think the whole ‘planes are statistically safer than any other means of transport’ saying is propaganda from airlines lol.
@@Cardioid2035 have you seen all the train crashes/runaways etc? Planes are not always safer, it depends if you consider distance travelled or time spent it is either the safest or not. If you were to sit the same amount of time in a car and a plane you're more likely to have an aircrash, if you were to drive the same distance on the car as on the plane, you'll more likely end up in a car crash. There is not a single means of transportation that is safe but planes are not really less safe these days, check how many of your crash videos were actually from the past decade and not from the 80s or 90s.
If flood lights could cause this kind of damage, it makes me wonder whether the airplane is made of the proper materials. A very hot day sitting out on the tarmac could melt the windows. I expect it is only a matter of time when we start seeing these planes falling out of the sky.
@@chipsawdust5816 Except for the times they do fall out of the sky ! Often enough due to faulty maintenance, but now it appears due to faulty manufacture.
Human carelessness and stupidity never surprise me. I used to enjoy flying, but with everything I've seen since the 2 737 Maxes went down, I'm completely done. The whole industry, building and flying, has strayed far away from the excellence it once possessed. SMH.
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I am not sure about the former. ~Albert Einstein. The 'safest mode of transportation' coming up with incredulous instances of rank beeeep.. often remind me of the above quote.
Please Note: your script writer should know that altitudes are not referred to "Flight Levels" until reaching 18,000 feet. So technically there is no "flight level 130", that is simply 13,000 feet. Those who have a basic knowledge of aviation would know this and mistakes like this damage your credibility in the aviation world.
You’re American ? Transition altitudes are lower in the rest of the world so yes there are flight levels below 18000ft. Get your facts correct before making comments!
I was the script writer… 😳. In the US and Canada the transition altitude it set as standard at 18,000ft. For Europe (where this took place) and for most of the rest of the world. The transition altitude varies from airport to airport. You can regularly find yourself at FL40.
I hope you enjoyed the video, if you did, please give it a like! 😁
*** In this incident, Titan Airways flight 305 was an A321, but an a320 is used to simulate it in this video. This is because the A320 model provides a higher quality model.
Much appreciate your time and resources in crafting this mini documentaries with such good production values.
And double thanks for covering incidents, anecdotes which hardly anyone else covers.
.
This one was indeed something that leaves one fuming with varied emotions.
.
If you need any advice or help ever in adding subtitles to your documentaries in any South Asian, Indian languages.. I would feel humbled to assist.
Just found your channel and I love the way you present your content. I'm a lifelong aviation geek from a family of aviators. I love the way you did your editing, it was presented so smartly and was excellent information. Who would have thought filming lighting could do that 🤷♀️
How bizarre! Thankfully, nobody was injured or killed.
What reg was this A321neo?
What a story! As someone that worked aircraft maintenance for many years, (retired) and changed out countless interior panes for cosmetic purposes, I never encountered melting of any type. Window shade warping is a common occurrence, but this is such a rarity. Those must have been some intense lights. Bravo to the crew for their quick and professional actions.
Definitely one of the more bizarre stories in aviation! There’s another strange incident over the Caribbean when American Airlines 901 went into a dive, when the first officer seat moved forward and legs, which were crossed, pushed the control yoke, there is more to this story and it’s pretty interesting. This is the date for the incident: Wednesday 29 June 1994. Would be cool to see it covered on UA-cam!
I’ll take a look, thank you. I’m always on the search for more obscure or unknown incidents. I try to bring fresh stories to this amazing audience. Thank you for the suggestion.
@@CuriousPilot90 no problem! love to watch this channel grow every video!
I'm curious as to whether the black painted fuselage contributed to the damage.
Yes, I left a similar comment.
Utterly bizarre, plus amazing save by the crew!
Brilliant video! Thank you. I was trying to figure out what could have caused the windows to fall out! It was not what I was expecting. So much happens in the aviation industry everyday, it’s crazy to see stories like this. Thank you for bringing it to us.
This is crazy! Thanks for the great content curious pilot!
A few minutes ago, I was watching the news on TV. Heard that the whole fleet of Boeing B-737 MAX 9 has been grounded for inspection after one of them lost a window and part of the fuselage little after takeoff in Alaska.
I have seen this, it was lucky that no one was sitting near the window/door. It will be interesting to see why this happened.
@@CuriousPilot90 Yeah, also I am curious.
The Max-9 wasn't a window issue, it was an emergency exit that was not in use.
@@CuriousPilot90very lucky. It was a deactivated emergency exit. They said a little boy had his shirt ripped off. If his mother was not holding onto him he would have been pulled out. The max has not done Boeing any favors since it's inception.
I'm from KICT, where a lot of Boeing fuselages and engine nacelles are made [along with the far less embattled Textron and Learjet] - this kind of news always sucks for the local economy. I'm thinking that Boeing needs to have a good purge and start developing a culture where they encourage people to identify problems and reward it, as well as rewarding the safety-improving solution. You can't keep cramming stuff into a 737 to avoid creating a new variant for which training would be mandated without compromising what otherwise is the Honda Civic of airplanes... ubiquitous and reliable. Their safety culture has sucked since they merged with McDonnell Douglas.
Jaw dropped by the hilarious chain of events in this one. Great teamwork by pax-crew-investigators!
A fantastic analysis, thank you so much.
Great video. Fortunate that the damage to the window was spotted early in the flight at a relatively low altitude.
Oddly something similar happened to TWA at LAX following filming of a commercial. The bad windows were found during dehangering inspection. There also was scorched paint. The filming lights get quite hot.
That was absolutely mindblowing. Who would believe that set lighting could cause any damage, let alone a substantial one, to a modern aircraft. This could have indeed turned out completely differently, if it wasn't for the awareness of the loadmaster and the immediate actions by the crew.
Now, I understand that the damage was not as apparent prior to the flight compared to how it was after landing, and yet, as I understand it, there was a clear physical evidence for damage on at least on one window. I wonder how something like this can be overlooked on a walk around during daylight, and especially in such a chill environment. And then, you would also expect the cabin crew who prepared the cabin, to have noticed something so off. So I am left with more than one answered question.
Were there any safety recommendations by the AAIB due to this?
Because it wasn’t picked up during the walk around, it could be assumed that the windows came loose during the taxi, flight and landing (the horizontal stabiliser being hit by one of the windows suggests one fell out during the flight)
The other shattered one on the exit taxiway could suggest it fell off after the landing.
For safety recommendations, there were none of yet apart from to be aware of the issue. I think once they conclude how the lights caused the damage, whether it was due to them being too close or if they generate too much heat even at a further distance. Then more preventative measures will be issued.
@@CuriousPilot90 As I mentioned above the same thing happened about 25 years ago to TWA. There should be some precautions before high temperature filming lights are shined through windows. Also cold cabin is an indication of cabin leakage or bad trim air heat flow. Above 15000 feet the cabin must be heated.. an aircraft with a leak or bad trim air can not cruse above 25000 feet for long.
It's a perfect example for Murphy's law...
@@xcofcd ua-cam.com/video/maLBGFYl9_o/v-deo.html D&O of that door showing locking
O
Surely anyone walking into the cabin would wonder where the smell of burnt rubber had come from!
Low probability events still happen, TG the loadmaster caught it early.
Incredible! You'd think someone would've noticed the stench of melted rubber in the cabin at some point when filming concluded.
This is such a unique incident! Very strange. It highlights the need for careful planning and attention to detail when using an aircraft for an uncommon purpose like this. Doing inspection/maintenance AFTERWARD probably would have been a good idea as well.
Been watching Air Crash investigation since childhood, never ever could have anticipated this unusual tale of events!
I have a video about an incident (or set of incidents) known as ‘Black Christmas’ I think you’ll find that one interesting too! Hopefully another incident you haven’t heard of.
Wow, who would have thought? Importantly, they found the cause of this bizarre incident.
Similar thing must've happened with a Turkish Airlines 787 and similar lighting for a photoshoot, with the windows melting
Reminds me of the Comet window design fault. Interesting video.
How unusual this must have been! Well done to that loadmaster. I hadn’t heard about this. Great video - I’m really enjoying your channel.
Wow ... Incredible.
A truly extraordinary case and an excellent video. From a B1. Great work and Happy New Year.
Thank you kindly!
Good old film crews again. Have no idea
How shocking! As you alluded to, plane makers have produced windows for decades, probably improving continuously, but this event which might seem to laymen such as I, “within acceptable perimeters” could induce catastrophic failure 😳👏👍👌
Agreed!
The fact, that the fuselage was painted dark hence there was limited light deflection didn't help either. I guess this could further contribute to the damage
Excellent video !!!
That is a gorgeous aircraft.
If the aircraft fuselage was painted black, would that have increased the heat absorption from the flood lights?
Exactly what I was thinking, the who surface of the airplane would be hotter than a white one in theory right?
Hard to say - I don't think that could be easily quantified. The fuselage may have transferred some heat to the window frames but it was the plastic reaching its critical temperature that caused the failure. And clearly the light manufacturer knew they delivered a lot of heat!
Had the window defect not been detected and it failed in the middle of the Atlantic, finding an alternate airport within range at the safe, lower, altitude and therefore much higher fuel burn, could have made this far more fraught.
Exactly! It’s so unusual to hear of a story like this one. Their oxygen masks wouldn’t last long enough for the diversion. They would have to fly there below 10,000. At least it would be a little warmer…
ETOPS calculates fuel and oxygen for a low level diversion from mid Atlantic,
I wonder who picked up the bill for this one?
Should be the film crew's bill. Their lights caused the damage.
I used to clean there office back in the 90s
very interesting. makes me wonder if the lights where using factory standard bulbs or if they'd been 'beefed up'. great vid anyway. never heard of this before.
Wow. So did the studio have to pay damages or anything?
With the incident happening so recently, it doesn’t look to be concluded in that sense. I’m sure it would be a long legal issue to prove that the floodlights used beyond 10 m would be safe to use. If not, the flood light manufacturer could be liable, whereas with the dataset warning from them, the studio could be liable. If it is published, I’ll be sure to add it to a community post. :)
It likely will just go through insurance and that will be the end of it. Likely the airline and production company coming to an agreement. The total monetary loss is not that great, unless the stab is damaged by the window impact.
@@DWBurns Several sets of window would be incredibly expensive. Airplane parts are worth more than gold. The labor to install them, not as much as what you pay for your car to be worked on...
Thats a beautiful black plane. Do we have at least an approximation of the temperature the flood lights were giving off? What is the failure temperature of the seal?
OK a few things right off the bat. First, I need to go make some popcorn. Second, that livery is awesome. See you again when I'm done watching!
Great video!
Is this an A320 he is talking about in the video?
The aircraft model used is an A320 neo. The exact model of aircraft in the incident was an A321. The reason for the use of the A320 is because the simulator model provides better quality.
Love your accent!! Very interesting info.
Thanks 😁
The heat produced by multiple banks of PAR's is quite substantial. Much cooler and efficient going with HMI's..
Any mention of the black paint?
Boeing likely wishes the recent blowout of an Alaskan Air 737 wall panel had a similar cause. Luckily both this incident and the 737 incident resulted in no injuries or fatalities.
If that plane crashes, we have no idea why it happened.
A bit off topic but do we know what movie/show/ad they were shooting the day prior? Would love to watch it.
How is it that the minimum distance for illumination is 10m, but for flammable objects it's 1.5m? Surely that should be the other way round. Or am I missing something?
don’t the pilots or flight engineers normally do a plane inspection before the flight, why wasn’t this caught before the flight
What most people don't realise is that plastic products...including composite laminating resins....have a Tg (glass transition temperature where the resin starts to soften). This temperature can be as low as 85°C...easily achievable under direct summer sunshine. This is the reason why most modern planes and composite structured gliders and yachts are painted white or a light colour.
Tg, yes that's what I was searching for in my ancient brain. The synapses just weren't sailing that far into my tech data. Thanks!
They have no idea how close that was
Yikes! Now Airbus too! Its a bad cabin window week!
Not an Airbuses fault, the muppets film crew should have monitored situation whilst filming.
The lighting equipment used by film crews tequires a lot of knowledge; some setups throw off a _lot_ of heat.
I learned that from being at the receiving end while emceeing a stage show. I picked up a leather flogger that had brass studs in the grip and got nice round burns in the palm of my hand. The gaffer's new assistant had used the wrong spotlight on it and the heat was far in excess of what was appropriate.
Explaining the resulting burns to my straight job was a treat.
In any case, I can easily see polymer windows being compromised even from 10 meters.
Ouch! I hope it healed quickly!
@@oboealto Thank you. They took about six weeks all told until my hand was back to mostly normal function. The docs rated it as second degree with two "buttons" at very minor bits of third.
Part of it was my fault, as I created an extemporaneous scene in order to let the tool cool before I finally handed it off to the headline top and got offstage to have them cooled at treated.
The headline read it and played along and I was able to convey with faceaway talk what was going on so he wasn't burned at all. He switched up, threw the flogger away and subbed a different implement.
How did they not notice this during the pre flight walk around?
My father once melted the left rear light on his car with a floodlight while working on the back mounted engine. It didn't ever happened to him again. I'd expect more from a professional team doing that job every day...
1:41 Wait, I think there's another incident to uncover here. Let me know if you see it!
You didn't specify the type of plane mate. I know it's an A320 but not all your audience might.
A321
@@chipsawdust5816 Yes, A321
I wonder what the film was? Would be a bit eerie watching it knowing of the outcome
Just yesterday, an Alaska Airlines 737 Max9 lost a door panel/window (apparently not in use in this configuration for Alaska Airlines) resulting in sudden depressurization. Thankfully no one was seriously injured in this incident either. A large part of the fleet has been grounded. Is this becoming a more common problem? Thanks for your video, I remember seeing the report on the news last year of this incident. Hard to believe movie-set lights can do so much damage.
It's quite uncommon actually.
Great job.
Why is this video zoomed in ?
✈️ ✈️ ✈️ Comment for the algorithm.
😁😁😁😁😁😁😁✈️🎉
I have been traveling my entire life (on airplanes 90% of the time), and I have NEVER EVER sat next to a door!. I have ALWAYS booked a seat and sat just behind the wing and always in an aisle seat... just sayin'... Happy new year everyone.
Not even with the temptation of extra legroom! 😁 Happy new year!
Unless it’s one of those emergencies when you need to evacuate really quickly… 🔥
@Henipah That’s true, but then the have the pressure of remembering how to open the door with everyone waiting.
Imagine that!@@CuriousPilot90
I'm 6'5" and always pick the aisle just so I can stick a leg out in the aisle when they aren't serving :) I don't fear the doors or windows - the odds of one failing are worse than a lottery win.
How’s your career going, curious pilot
Great thank you. The hardest part at the moment is finding the time to get these videos made! But the balance is working for now. 😁 If you don’t mind sharing, what do you do for a living?
@@CuriousPilot90 well I’m at school in Yr11 at the moment
Ah yes! Any update on the glasses for the application?
@@CuriousPilot90 no not yet, but I’ve been thinking that I should do an apprenticeship in the RAF first, and then after my 3 year contact, join as a pilot.
Not many planes are painted all black as it absorbs much heat maybe even from the lamps...
is this plane a 350 neo?
That could have played a part in it!
The aircraft was an A321 but an A320 neo is used for the simulation due to the better quality model.
yes, a much nicer plane. black is ver good at gaining ifrafed that's why fewer planes use it...i guess. the japan air crash, was a neo 350 it just turned to ash with comparatively small 'burn'. compared to the explosive burn of the coast guard plane... the new planes can have huge feul economies as well.@@CuriousPilot90
HANEDA CRASH WHY IT HAPPENED
ua-cam.com/video/elg6ICNp-WQ/v-deo.html@@CuriousPilot90
She doesn't be explained at the beginning what type of aero-Plainé this is bé
😟😮😦😐
It is an A321, although an A320 is used for the simulation. 😊
I wonder how much it's going to cost that filming company for all the damages they caused 🤔
A Titan Airways Airbus A321-200N, registration G-OATW performing flight AWC-305Y from London Stansted,EN (UK) to Orlando,FL (USA) with 21 crew, was climbing through about 10,000 feet out of Stansted's runway 22 when the crew noticed excessive noise in the cabin, stopped the climb at about FL150 and returned to Stansted for a safe landing on runway 22 about 37 minutes after departure.
The British AAIB reported it was discovered three cabin windows were missing or loose, there was also damage to the left hand stabilizer, the aircraft sustained substantial damage. The occurrence was rated an accident and is being investigated by the AAIB. Airbus not robust.
If set of light can melt window , then this plane has no business to airborne
I bet the film crew weren’t too popular with their employers after the company no doubt got a huge bill for compensation.
I genuinely cant believe people assert that flying is ‘safer relative to other means of transport’ because it seems there’s endless stories like this
What about the endless car crashes that happen?
This flight arrived safely, what’s your issue?
@@kickedinthecalfbyacow7549 I’m saying I’ve watched at least 100+ hours of plane crash/ malfunction videos over the years and planes are not at all as safe as they’re made out to be…
@@JosephSeabourne Cars are definitely the #1 most dangerous means of transportation without a doubt, but I’d argue planes are #2 on that ranking. I’m beginning to think the whole ‘planes are statistically safer than any other means of transport’ saying is propaganda from airlines lol.
@@Cardioid2035 have you seen all the train crashes/runaways etc? Planes are not always safer, it depends if you consider distance travelled or time spent it is either the safest or not. If you were to sit the same amount of time in a car and a plane you're more likely to have an aircrash, if you were to drive the same distance on the car as on the plane, you'll more likely end up in a car crash. There is not a single means of transportation that is safe but planes are not really less safe these days, check how many of your crash videos were actually from the past decade and not from the 80s or 90s.
What type of aircraft>?
A black one
A321
You‘ll have a blast with Boeing‘s door plugs then.
👍🏼
How many millions of dollars did this cost ? ...
737 MAX 9: "Hold my beer..."
titan plane, titan sub.....hmmm dont think id wanna be travelling on eithet
Not often you hear Southend Airport in these videos! Go my home city 🤣
Mine too! 😁
@@CuriousPilot90 omg how funny 😄😄😄😄
Go flightline!
🍻🇨🇦😁
Shrinky Dink - Polycarbonates
i been on this plane lol
Movie lighting
Yooo I was unsubbed but I never did it myself-- check yo shyt
Is this a report from Boeing...?!@+
If flood lights could cause this kind of damage, it makes me wonder whether the airplane is made of the proper materials. A very hot day sitting out on the tarmac could melt the windows. I expect it is only a matter of time when we start seeing these planes falling out of the sky.
Even a very hot summer day doesn't get close to the direct heat projected straight onto plastic windows by some lighting equipment!
And yet, they make thousands of flights every day and aren't falling out of the sky. Don't hold your breath.
@@chipsawdust5816 Except for the times they do fall out of the sky ! Often enough due to faulty maintenance, but now it appears due to faulty manufacture.
Human carelessness and stupidity never surprise me.
I used to enjoy flying, but with everything I've seen since the 2 737 Maxes went down, I'm completely done. The whole industry, building and flying, has strayed far away from the excellence it once possessed. SMH.
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I am not sure about the former. ~Albert Einstein.
The 'safest mode of transportation' coming up with incredulous instances of rank beeeep.. often remind me of the above quote.
a
Please Note: your script writer should know that altitudes are not referred to "Flight Levels" until reaching 18,000 feet. So technically there is no "flight level 130", that is simply 13,000 feet. Those who have a basic knowledge of aviation would know this and mistakes like this damage your credibility in the aviation world.
You’re American ? Transition altitudes are lower in the rest of the world so yes there are flight levels below 18000ft. Get your facts correct before making comments!
I was the script writer… 😳. In the US and Canada the transition altitude it set as standard at 18,000ft. For Europe (where this took place) and for most of the rest of the world. The transition altitude varies from airport to airport. You can regularly find yourself at FL40.
Check transition altitudes in other parts of the world
There’s an echo here!!!
You obviously have no clue who you're talking to! lol
I am glad that at 35,000 feet, the windows do not melt due to harsh direct natural sunlight
It's extremely cold at 35000 feet.
@@chipsawdust5816 👍👌🙏