Looks much more feasible to me compared to a purely AI driven approach as the behaviour of the system is much easier to predict, design, control, and verify. This should also make certification for some levels of autonomy easier.
Excellent video! In the "Rule #2 Do not cut in recklessly" segment, why would you assume a human is driving the car? Wouldn't an EV with a faster response time be the worst case scenario, leaving you with less time to react?
Isn't the worst case if the other car reacts slowly? If it reacted faster it could more easily avoid a collision. That's also why they're also using the other car's minimum reasonable breaking capability instead of its maximum reasonable breaking capability.
@@DiapaYY You were right. I missed the part about them talking about the other car trying to avoid the collision too (and not just some general change like i was thinking). It's at 6:19: "here again we need to make an assumption about the minimum lateral breaking of the white vehicle. in other words how fast can it steer away from a lateral conflict".
5:19 is that good driving behavior? Wouldn't a normal driver see the car ahead is pulling out of the parking spot and wait for them to clear before passing? The Ego gets in a pretty risky situation with the on-coming car approaching and nowhere to go. Good thing the driver took over. Some companies are taking safety drivers out and putting the public at risk.
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #1 НАЧАЛО ПУТЕШЕСТВИЯ [Новый сезон] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/380Q7gLWGvk/mqdefault.jpg)
Looks much more feasible to me compared to a purely AI driven approach as the behaviour of the system is much easier to predict, design, control, and verify. This should also make certification for some levels of autonomy easier.
So excited for this!!!
Brilliant !
Excellent video!
In the "Rule #2 Do not cut in recklessly" segment, why would you assume a human is driving the car? Wouldn't an EV with a faster response time be the worst case scenario, leaving you with less time to react?
Isn't the worst case if the other car reacts slowly? If it reacted faster it could more easily avoid a collision. That's also why they're also using the other car's minimum reasonable breaking capability instead of its maximum reasonable breaking capability.
@@DiapaYY I will have to rewatch then. My thinking was that the quicker a change around you happens the less time (by definition) you have to react.
@@DiapaYY You were right. I missed the part about them talking about the other car trying to avoid the collision too (and not just some general change like i was thinking).
It's at 6:19: "here again we need to make an assumption about the minimum lateral breaking of the white vehicle. in other words how fast can it steer away from a lateral conflict".
The core of safety: keep a certain spacetime ownership unique!
5:19 is that good driving behavior? Wouldn't a normal driver see the car ahead is pulling out of the parking spot and wait for them to clear before passing? The Ego gets in a pretty risky situation with the on-coming car approaching and nowhere to go. Good thing the driver took over. Some companies are taking safety drivers out and putting the public at risk.
Mobileye is the way high-IQ people solve the autonomous driving problem.
Nah that's Tesla 😂
@@Factoryseconds123 That level 2 fake junk? Stop lying to yourself and the rest of the world!
It's like the Three Laws of Robotics by Asimov is coming to the real world!
I think rule #2 should be "people on mopeds playing stu*id games, should be allowed to win stu*id prices"