Unexpected! NASA is getting a new Space Station SOONER than expected...

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 лют 2025
  • Unexpected! NASA is getting a new Space Station SOONER than expected...
    ===
    #greatspacex #elonmusk #spacex #nasa #starship
    ==
    Advertisers who want to place ads on our channel, please contact the email manager: smanager339@gmail.com
    ===
    SpaceX Starship SN
    Be the first to sponsor us Thank you.
    www.patreon.co...
    ===
    Unexpected! NASA is getting a new Space Station SOONER than expected...
    Amazing news, everyone!
    As the operational timeline of the ISS nears its end, concerns about having a timely replacement are growing. But I’m here to tell you that we can breathe a sigh of relief-a commercial space station, Axiom, has just received an exciting update suggesting it may be ready to operate sooner than expected.
    What changes have just been made to the Axiom space station? How significant is its role in the future of space exploration?
    Let’s dive in and find out on today’s episode of Great SpaceX!
    Unexpected! NASA is getting a new Space Station SOONER than expected...
    2030 was set as the year the ISS will retire. Replacing this space station is extremely important because it directly impacts the U.S. presence in space, especially amidst the increasing challenge posed by China’s station, Tiangong. The situation is even more urgent as Russia plans to leave the ISS two years earlier, in 2028.
    Currently, several commercial stations are being planned to fill this critical gap, with the Axiom space station standing out among them. A unique aspect of the Axiom station is its construction approach: it will initially be built as an extension of the ISS, akin to raising birds in a nest. Once fully constructed, it will detach and operate independently, a transition anticipated by 2030.
    Unexpected! NASA is getting a new Space Station SOONER than expected...
    However, this timeline raises a significant concern. Given Russia’s impending departure from the ISS in 2028, waiting until 2030 could disrupt the U.S. presence in space. This makes a change in plans not only necessary but urgent. So, how will it change?
    The answer lies in a revised construction sequence for the Axiom space station. To understand this, let’s first review the original plan. Initially, Axiom Space intended to launch the first service module, Hab-1, as the main living and working quarters for four astronauts. This would be followed by the Hab-2 module to double the station's volume. Afterward, the Research and Manufacturing Facility (RMF) module, equipped with airlocks for extravehicular activities (EVAs) and a glass observation room, would be launched. Finally, the Power and Thermal Module (PTM) would provide power for the station, enabling it to detach and operate independently by 2030.
    ----
    We use images and content in accordance with the UA-cam Fair Use copyright guidelines: www.youtube.co...
    Any questions about copyright please send us via Gmail: colonbina25@gmail.com
    To be resolved, thank you.
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 158

  • @gptiede
    @gptiede 4 дні тому +6

    The AXIOM station is currently over 6 years behind schedule and they have yet to complete the outer shell of the the first module, so what is going to change? How can they possibly complete two modules in the next 2-3 years? This falls under "I'll believe it when I see it".

  • @Astrotaff71
    @Astrotaff71 6 днів тому +5

    Shame to see the ISS go but they don’t last for ever but my favourite Space Station was Skylab that was incredible after what happened when it launched in 1973

  • @ultimathule1000
    @ultimathule1000 4 дні тому +4

    I heared that the AXIOM project manager came to the manufacturing center to put the project back on schedule and that he does not share the optimistic appraisal of the situation made by the manufacturing director. The manufacturing director told him that he needs more men confirming that he will double the efforts. The project manager reminded that the CEO of the company is not as forgiving as he is.
    I think that the station will be finished on time. At least for now everything is proceeding as I have foreseen.

  • @jcdisci
    @jcdisci 6 днів тому +8

    IF....(an enormous 2-letter word)....if the first launch keeps to its' schedule, it's feasible. But what I still don't understand is, if Starship already has more volume than the current station, why not use it?

    • @cardcasacardona9083
      @cardcasacardona9083 6 днів тому

      Por ejemplo...hay muchos intereses en juego, hay mucha corrupción en los proveedores de la Nasa desde hace muchos años.

  • @josephhurley6300
    @josephhurley6300 4 дні тому +4

    Space x needs a chance!

  • @wakamoli8248
    @wakamoli8248 6 днів тому +2

    A space station needs to be designed so that each module they send is a separate lab or usable living space and is connected to a docking hub that can be added for future add-ons.

  • @robertjohnson-ns2pw
    @robertjohnson-ns2pw 6 днів тому +2

    Yes, but they gotta keep up with what they’re saying they’re gonna do. Because we gotta keep being the first ones in space like we always have been.

  • @jcdisci
    @jcdisci 6 днів тому +2

    One of your more informative videos. Thanks.

    • @colonbina1
      @colonbina1  6 днів тому

      Thanks for your support. Keep following and discussing on our channel ☺️

  • @Noneya-bw5gm
    @Noneya-bw5gm 6 днів тому +4

    "Ok guys, were are going to build a space station. Suggestions?"
    "Hey, I know, let's make Four Different modules so we can't take advantage of common parts and make it more complex to boot!"
    The habit of making everything Bespoke will kill the Space industry.

  • @ronwatkins5775
    @ronwatkins5775 6 днів тому +2

    I would like to see them expand to an 8 meter diameter module for Starship deployment.

  • @That_Guy78
    @That_Guy78 3 дні тому +2

    I recognize this building @1:45. It was a Fry's Electronics before they went out of business.

  • @Nate_o_eight
    @Nate_o_eight 6 днів тому +2

    Just a heads up. When you're picking the title of a video, it should usually reflect what's in the video. Like NASA isn't getting new space station sooner than expected. They are getting one element of it first, and thats possibly, not for sure

  • @LuisVillanuevaCubero
    @LuisVillanuevaCubero 4 дні тому +2

    YES!

  • @mosbysmen-ozarks
    @mosbysmen-ozarks 2 дні тому +3

    fill the iss with food , water and oxygen and move it further out to use as a warehouse , dont be in a hurry to deorbit the iss , it is paid for use it

  • @Meister1551
    @Meister1551 6 днів тому +1

    Yes to the new plan.

  • @estherboruszko5585
    @estherboruszko5585 6 днів тому +1

    GREAT SPACEX THANK YOU SO MUCH🚀🧑‍🚀

    • @colonbina1
      @colonbina1  6 днів тому +1

      Thanks for your comment. Have a nice day

    • @estherboruszko5585
      @estherboruszko5585 6 днів тому

      @colonbina1 The same to you 🙏✨💕 Happy Sunday 💫 In Jesus'Name Amen 🙌✨🤜🤛

  • @michaelandrews5019
    @michaelandrews5019 6 днів тому +32

    If you want to get it done call space x otherwise it will take 50 years and cost trillions space x could have it done in a couple of years

    • @colonbina1
      @colonbina1  6 днів тому +6

      Agree 👍

    • @WalterKazban
      @WalterKazban 6 днів тому +4

      I agree also

    • @jimeditorial
      @jimeditorial 6 днів тому

      Does SpaceX have a space station?

    • @withlessAsbestos
      @withlessAsbestos 6 днів тому +3

      That’s just because, unlike other space flight contractors, they’re not a publicly traded Military Industrial player.

    • @rollvideo
      @rollvideo 6 днів тому +3

      Wow. The highly qualified experts have spoken with immeasurable authority.

  • @benjaminmiller3968
    @benjaminmiller3968 3 дні тому +2

    Cool 😎

  • @ncbob27409
    @ncbob27409 6 днів тому +1

    Yes, this new order makes much more sense

  • @jeff8845
    @jeff8845 6 днів тому +4

    Ummm according to the timeline, this station is already two years behind. I don’t foresee any modules launching in the next couple of years.

  • @coryodell2482
    @coryodell2482 5 днів тому +2

    Set up a E.V.A. external obstacle course on the station for advanced orbital orientation training for cheap.

  • @Bland-79
    @Bland-79 6 днів тому +3

    SpaceX will likely have a much bigger station the size of ISS inside with one launch and at a tiny fraction of the price.

    • @avgjoe5969
      @avgjoe5969 6 днів тому +1

      True, but if they fund the station internally, they can build what they want... even if it is short sighted in design.

  • @jimreinhart9539
    @jimreinhart9539 6 днів тому

    Yes, this seems like a good path forward.

  • @stevepashley795
    @stevepashley795 4 дні тому +3

    Seems like an advert for Axiom. There are others in the pipeline!!!!

  • @briankumpan9892
    @briankumpan9892 6 днів тому +1

    its like every 2 weeks its a new one, so which new/old one is it?

  • @baddinosaur1548
    @baddinosaur1548 5 днів тому +3

    Please note: Nelson is no longer the head of NASA.

  • @christopherbirbeck1574
    @christopherbirbeck1574 6 днів тому +1

    Yes

  • @Websitedr
    @Websitedr 5 днів тому +2

    They absolutely need to be able to disconnect it earlier than intended because 2030 is only 5 years away.

  • @Astrotaff71
    @Astrotaff71 6 днів тому +2

    Maybe they should approach ESA and Japan

  • @tonywiegand8049
    @tonywiegand8049 5 днів тому +1

    Should have been decided at the very beginning, not forced to change hurriedly.

  • @keithscott1926
    @keithscott1926 6 днів тому +1

    It’s about time. Axiom has had nothing but financial issues. 😡

  • @Tony-G36
    @Tony-G36 2 дні тому +1

    I feel the arm should run on a rail along the bottom of the pods an have access to all areas lol

    • @harmonyconsult
      @harmonyconsult День тому

      It actually now operates as an inch worm. It connects to ports on the station with one end, then swing around and plugs the other end into the next port. It then releases the first connections. Repeat as necessary. It's actually pretty cool.

  • @Laudnumify
    @Laudnumify 6 днів тому +1

    Are any pieces of the ISS usable on the next station? Like maybe the solar panels ?

    • @barongerhardt
      @barongerhardt 6 днів тому

      Between ESA, Canada, Japan, Russia; even small pieces are going to have international politics all over them. It would be great to reuse parts, but politically the only solution is likely to be de-orbit it all.

  • @Hankyjane
    @Hankyjane 6 годин тому +1

    Many don't get it!! Exploration provides millions of GOOD paying jobs around the world. These jobs support other jobs sectors and create spin-offs of the usable high tech technologies.
    It is WHAT will help all nations and all people of the world increase their abilities and their economic self worth.

  • @ericthorson1686
    @ericthorson1686 6 днів тому +7

    Why not just connect a bunch of Starships together. It seems like a much simpler solution. SpaceX is already building human habitats within the Starship. This seems to be redundant.

    • @Loosetweezers
      @Loosetweezers 6 днів тому +1

      Because starship isn’t a thing yet and the way things are going with Mein Führer Elon Musk, the future of spaced is more uncertain than one may have thought a few years ago.

    • @cardcasacardona9083
      @cardcasacardona9083 6 днів тому

      ​@@Loosetweezerstal vez si...
      Primero von Braun ahora Musk ...los dos nazis? 😂

    • @hukphin740
      @hukphin740 5 днів тому

      ​@@Loosetweezersyou did watch Musky boy catch the booster though right? Twice even! You can't honestly watch that and be unimpressed.

  • @PanioloBee
    @PanioloBee 6 днів тому +1

    IMO, NASA should put some focus on developing technology to make interplanetary travel faster, such as a nuclear powered space tug. NASA could charge “ferry time” to pay for cost of maintaining and upgrading it.

  • @DanOh1951
    @DanOh1951 6 днів тому

    Yes!

  • @donhildum
    @donhildum 3 дні тому +2

    This move sould be moved to the moon. 11:07 11:10

  • @henkvandenbergh1301
    @henkvandenbergh1301 6 днів тому +2

    FYI: Bill Nelson no longer is head of NASA, so using his image in your attempt to publish an other bunch of clickbait just goes nowhere. But at least this time you did not put the word 'shocking' in your subject but I won't hold my breath.

  • @GUNVALKERIE
    @GUNVALKERIE 3 дні тому +2

    I thought NASA destroyed all of their space exploration technology... Where did they get the funding to get back on their feet? 🤔🤨

  • @dammy
    @dammy 6 днів тому +1

    Problem is Axiom is broke, have they paid SpaceX for all those private missions yet?

  • @powderperson1949
    @powderperson1949 6 днів тому

    yes

  • @myfavoritemartian1
    @myfavoritemartian1 6 днів тому +1

    Great Spacex: This may come as a surprise to you but NASA has a new administrator. Nelson is out and acting director Janet Petro sits in the big chair until conformation of Jared Issacman is completed by the US Senate. Nelson is out as of monday January 20th 2025.

    • @colonbina1
      @colonbina1  6 днів тому +2

      Thanks for your contribution

  • @Tommork-bq6ms
    @Tommork-bq6ms 5 днів тому +1

    Didn't you do this about 18 months ago?

  • @owenbowen2752
    @owenbowen2752 6 днів тому +3

    This is nonsense, this firm isn't doing to well financially. We need a spinning space station

  • @alex79suited
    @alex79suited День тому

    Why not a donut space station? Make it so you can build a ring upon ring. Eventually, a tube with a closed environment on the top. Just a thought. Peace ✌️ 😎.

  • @MarcusRobertoSouza
    @MarcusRobertoSouza 3 дні тому +3

    😮😮😊😊very good, eua, comgratulations, presidenté donald trump, and spacex.😮😮😊😊😊

  • @aaronburdon221
    @aaronburdon221 2 дні тому

    Anyone else get the urge to play Subnautica looking at those modules?

  • @Silverado2021
    @Silverado2021 6 днів тому +1

    doesn't look like an advancement.

    • @jcdisci
      @jcdisci 6 днів тому

      It's a 'schedule reprioritization'.

  • @BrotherofBanshee
    @BrotherofBanshee 4 дні тому +4

    Do we get a station that will be worth keeping up for more than a few decades this time?

    • @stevensmith797
      @stevensmith797 4 дні тому +1

      No , materials tech has got better but degredation will still happen , this is the most hostile place you can be ether as a man or machine

    • @BrotherofBanshee
      @BrotherofBanshee 4 дні тому

      @@stevensmith797 No it isn't. Try Venus or Jupiter.

  • @edfatheroftwomendavid4399
    @edfatheroftwomendavid4399 6 днів тому +1

    Axiom owes SpaceX a stack of money for launches of its astronauts on Dragon to the ISS. Are they expecting SpaceX to launch their modules for nothing? They've already been beaten to the punch by VAST and will continue to be beaten by VAST in my humble opinion.

    • @Goldengirl48
      @Goldengirl48 6 днів тому +1

      I completely agree! Vast is ahead in its ability to build and launch its modules sooner than Axion. But why not work together, save money, and progress much faster with SpaceX to help? It is such a waste of money spreading out these contracts like NASA does.

    • @greggweber9967
      @greggweber9967 6 днів тому

      As Admiral Lord Nelson once said to a subordinate Admiral who couldn't work with the subordinate's flag captain while pointing to the French fleet at anchor, "The enemy is over there."​@Goldengirl48

  • @festeradams3972
    @festeradams3972 6 днів тому

    I suspect the ISS will be retired sooner than later. that said, NASA should keep in mind that one of the first requirements now should be frequent and reliable transport flights available. Not quite there yet...

    • @hukphin740
      @hukphin740 5 днів тому

      Isn't Falcon Heavy qualified?

  • @jeffhaley7897
    @jeffhaley7897 6 днів тому +2

    I thought than were almost bank rupt owing everyone money and unable to pay the factory building the prototype

  • @petertimp5416
    @petertimp5416 6 днів тому

    👍🙏

  • @skeelo69
    @skeelo69 6 днів тому +1

    Is there a reason why you are showing the ex-NASA Administrator Bill Nelson in your ident picture ?.

    • @colonbina1
      @colonbina1  6 днів тому

      I will update this, thanks

  • @Astrotaff71
    @Astrotaff71 6 днів тому

    It looks a bit like Mir

  • @johnstewart579
    @johnstewart579 6 днів тому +2

    Kudos to Axioms new plan. However the VAST space station, named Haven 1, is currently scheduled to launch this year 2025. It will launch aboard a Falcon 9 rocket. Once in orbit the "words first commercial space station" will be visited and powered by Space X Dragon capsules. Visiting space tourists will spend up to two weeks aboard Haven 1

  • @brentanderson4315
    @brentanderson4315 5 днів тому +2

    i like vast better

  • @MrRockydee07
    @MrRockydee07 6 днів тому +1

    What about Boeing ? What's going with them ?

    • @pharaday5944
      @pharaday5944 6 днів тому +7

      they're still trying to figure out how to make airplanes correctly

    • @ronbardmass6165
      @ronbardmass6165 6 днів тому +2

      They ran out of duct tape.

  • @curtbevington77
    @curtbevington77 6 днів тому +3

    Be good idea to keep NASA as far away from any future Space Station as possible.

    • @thoughtsausage7
      @thoughtsausage7 5 днів тому

      Space x is NASA and your a fanboy that has been brain washed

    • @hukphin740
      @hukphin740 5 днів тому

      ​@@thoughtsausage7huh? NASA and SpaceX are nothing alike. What are you even attempting to convey?

    • @thoughtsausage7
      @thoughtsausage7 5 днів тому

      @ first of all, calm down, NASA is far and above above space x, it does actual science, went to the moon, created the space station, flew many reusable space missions, etc. NASA money is funding space x, so, it is NASA. That’s what privatization of it was all about. Only now we get a Nazi running missions, who doesn’t care about science, and can pull out once his contracts are over.

  • @dhl1544
    @dhl1544 6 днів тому +2

    hmmm, I'll believe it when I see it.

    • @RR-or5ip
      @RR-or5ip 6 днів тому +1

      That is what I was thinking....I bet we will have no station in space for a decade yet China and Russia will

  • @mikemerlo4156
    @mikemerlo4156 6 днів тому +3

    This is rediculous! Why is NASA continuing to prototype 2 or 3 different stations? VAST Space station is the best. Either way they go, all US spacecraft should use SpaceX style hatches and connectors so anything new can be added on to.

  • @IntoTheFray.58
    @IntoTheFray.58 6 днів тому +3

    I still think SpaceX should take the billion NASA gave it to deorbit the ISS and use it to build a space tug variant of either Starship or Dragon and push the ISS to a garage orbit just outside of GEO. Put a couple of Optimus on it to do maintenance and possibly continue scientific work. For historic preservation purposes, if nothing else.

    • @NoopityNoop
      @NoopityNoop 6 днів тому

      That would take a massive amount of fuel to do. Starship with fuelers could do it, if it's ready in time.

  • @zanar69
    @zanar69 2 дні тому +1

    Axiom is bankrupt.

  • @texasww6853
    @texasww6853 6 днів тому +1

    Great Ai😂

  • @billprice8596
    @billprice8596 6 днів тому +1

    Sorry, my money is on Vast.

  • @rollvideo
    @rollvideo 6 днів тому +1

    No Russia. YOU WILL LEAVE NOW! 😂

  • @aleksanderkuncwicz7277
    @aleksanderkuncwicz7277 23 години тому

    Usa should make a space habitat land on the moon and put people thier using rockets.

  • @katrine-pearls
    @katrine-pearls 6 днів тому +1

    True, NASA- ISS will retire very, very soon. I can't wait to see the pivotal SpaceX and VAST as the private company launching a commercial space station into orbits, greatest❗️
    Thank U kev 🌟
    ~ 😺

  • @czarcastic1458
    @czarcastic1458 4 години тому

    Nonsense.

  • @richardsterne2875
    @richardsterne2875 6 днів тому +2

    China, Russia and the USA should all standardize their airlocks. So if there is an emergency any one could help.

    • @cardcasacardona9083
      @cardcasacardona9083 6 днів тому

      EEUU no quiere... China llegará antes a todos los sitios.

    • @jimeditorial
      @jimeditorial 5 днів тому

      @@richardsterne2875 a prototype of a standard airlock was flown on the ASTP

  • @gword5402
    @gword5402 6 днів тому

    I agree with some of the comments on the last few weeks of videos. These are getting lame! Unsubscribe!

  • @cardcasacardona9083
    @cardcasacardona9083 6 днів тому +1

    Hollywood right now...

  • @Oldman5261
    @Oldman5261 6 днів тому +2

    You totally omitted the fact that Axiom Space has severe financial problems and may go bankrupt before it launches its first module. Do your homework before you make a new video. You are nothing but a SpaceX Fanboy. Unsubscribe!

  • @user-ThomReec8587
    @user-ThomReec8587 6 днів тому +2

    Repeat again wasting time

  • @clydedowney2620
    @clydedowney2620 5 днів тому +2

    How long has Hitler owned SpaceX!

    • @1973mre
      @1973mre 4 дні тому +3

      You’re so stupid

    • @mosbysmen-ozarks
      @mosbysmen-ozarks 2 дні тому +2

      how long have you been a moron?

    • @Geezerelli
      @Geezerelli 2 дні тому +1

      Don’t be a Democrat. Be creative not destructive.

  • @kenulreich8502
    @kenulreich8502 5 днів тому +2

    All SpaceX contracts need to be cancelled now. Elon Musk is illegally accessing the United States payment systems. This goes far beyond accessing budget information!

    • @hukphin740
      @hukphin740 5 днів тому +2

      🙄🙄

    • @tomperone9338
      @tomperone9338 5 днів тому +5

      Oh brother.

    • @theonlysjc
      @theonlysjc 5 днів тому +1

      Because "trust me bro"

    • @BrotherofBanshee
      @BrotherofBanshee 4 дні тому +1

      That sounds actionable. I hope you have proof.

    • @kenulreich8502
      @kenulreich8502 3 дні тому

      @@BrotherofBanshee I'm just a nobody, not a lawyer or investigative journalist. I'm just a guy who keeps up on the news cycle. 😁

  • @jimeditorial
    @jimeditorial 6 днів тому

    NASA should get out of the crewed spaceflight business...AI and robots make it unnecessary to send humans into space

  • @Antposse
    @Antposse 6 днів тому +1

    Yes!

  • @markg3831
    @markg3831 6 днів тому +1

    Yes

  • @ravaun505
    @ravaun505 5 днів тому +1

    Yes

  • @theohughes7170
    @theohughes7170 5 днів тому +1

    Yes

  • @Michael-n4n3i
    @Michael-n4n3i 4 дні тому +2

    Yes