“Universals produce occult pseudo-entities” - Dharmakirti, a 7th century Sanskrit epistemologist working in the Buddhist tradition of the two pramanas/proofs of perception and cognition… The contention here concerns the separation of the two and the nature of fabrication whereby the universal colonises and dominates the particular At the level of the concept itself, the separation of self-consciousness from the consciousness of objects produces a state of rest and a state of movement each within and limited to their own spheres - simply called non-fabrication.
So, if I remember correctly my 1993 Adorno classes at Essex - the solution proposed in the Dialectic of Enlightenment was not a rejection of instrumental thinking per se but rather a redoubling The “reconciliation” of man/nature, thought/being, universal/particular is to delimit itself by itself to avoid falling into a bad infinity. Or as Lacan said, there is no sexual rapport.
Just the sum of your particular natural condition plus your particular position in society (and history and so on) plus what you do with it while you are still alive.
As Bernstein himself once said to me, “I’m not your mother!” 😂 If you forget who you are then you can look at your name at the top of the post where it says, Sven-Erik Lindstrom the third. Hope this helps.
Very good
Great
The fate of the human species literally hangs in the balance with respect to how we heed the message of this talk.
“Universals produce occult pseudo-entities” - Dharmakirti, a 7th century Sanskrit epistemologist working in the Buddhist tradition of the two pramanas/proofs of perception and cognition…
The contention here concerns the separation of the two and the nature of fabrication whereby the universal colonises and dominates the particular
At the level of the concept itself, the separation of self-consciousness from the consciousness of objects produces a state of rest and a state of movement each within and limited to their own spheres - simply called non-fabrication.
So, if I remember correctly my 1993 Adorno classes at Essex - the solution proposed in the Dialectic of Enlightenment was not a rejection of instrumental thinking per se but rather a redoubling
The “reconciliation” of man/nature, thought/being, universal/particular is to delimit itself by itself to avoid falling into a bad infinity.
Or as Lacan said, there is no sexual rapport.
sooo many ads on this video
I want to know who I am. Please help.
Just the sum of your particular natural condition plus your particular position in society (and history and so on) plus what you do with it while you are still alive.
That is pretty much what you are.
and "who" you are, naturally.
As Bernstein himself once said to me, “I’m not your mother!” 😂
If you forget who you are then you can look at your name at the top of the post where it says, Sven-Erik Lindstrom the third. Hope this helps.