Roe v Wade reversal: How abortion restrictions are impacting the US one year on - BBC Newsnight
Вставка
- Опубліковано 18 чер 2023
- It’s a year since millions in the US were blocked from accessing an abortion, and the debate is as divisive as ever.
The reversing of the Roe v Wade ruling last summer was a controversial moment - both for those who believe termination ends an innocent life, and for those who feel any restrictions breaches a woman’s right to control her own body.
In a joint investigation for BBC Newsnight and Our World, Anna Collinson has travelled across two neighbouring - but very different - US states to see how restrictions on abortion are impacting America.
Please subscribe HERE bit.ly/1rbfUog
-
Website: www.bbc.co.uk/newsnight
Twitter: / bbcnewsnight
Facebook: / bbcnewsnight
#Newsnight #BBCNews
The fact that a woman can get raped and is then forced BY LAW to carry the child until birth is horrific. This has to change
Should a rapist face the death penalty or one of his offspring? We are not responsible for the sins of our fathers. If you found out that a friend was the result of a rape would you tell them that they should have been killed before they were born?
@@sebastianguerre6868 Lucky their offspring would never exist, because that's the point of abortion.
@@sebastianguerre6868 Don't bring your religion into this. You have any idea how many people in America DON'T practice your religion? On top of that, you have any idea how many times abortion is invoked in the bible? Almost never! This is why Jews have so little to say on the matter. The 39 books of the old testament that they share in deeming sacred alongside Christians have so little dialogue on the subject. Their Talmud even permits it. If the bible was a legal document, the ambiguity would favor pro-choice people. That's how the law works. To add to that, the instances where ending a pregnancy is mentioned is in a hypothetical regarding adultery where termination of the fetus is prescribed. There's also ample dialogue in the bible that life starts after the baby escapes the birth canal and not before. None of this should matter since America is not a theocracy. It's just plain immoral to impose religious belief on others, including made up religious belief. Your hypothetical is also very disingenuous. Of course it would be rude to say that about someone that was the result of rape. It's not hard to walk and chew gum though. You can simultaneously show that person respect and believe that women have the right to choose. You're oversimplifying a massive and pivotal part of woman's life here. I went to school with a girl who was adopted. My mother administered the adoption. The girl's mother considered abortion but kept the baby obviously and went the adoption route. The girl grew up to be pro-choice and is still friends with her birth mom. Yeah, I know. Nuance is so frustrating and complicated 😅
Just three words for you……
Morning After Pill
Be real. How many of these abortions are the result of rape vs oops I forgot to take the pill/ use a condom.
No matter what side of the debate you stand on there needs to be a serious conversation about expanding foster and adoption care services to take care of abuse, neglected or abandoned children.
how about care for waomen such as raped or at the risk of life?
Guess which side is not taking part in that.
Yes!! Agreed!!!!
its in human to force a woman to carry an unwanted unplanned conception event to full trrm the aim should be to offer more contraceptives and safe earlier termination
It's easier to tell women to take care of children than pay more in taxes for state funded child care. Everyone cares about "life" until it affects them personally, then it becomes "f**k em".
The woman at 6:50 I wonder if she would be happy to carry a pregnancy to term, go through the traumatic experience that is birth for her child to die in her hands. That's such a stupid and entitled statement.
That’s very Christian of her to say that it’s better to have a stillbirth than prevent it all together like there is some righteousness to it.
@@lauracee5081 if the baby will not survive it does not matter if it is born in nine months or if a birth is induced in 6th or 7th month, the baby would either way die once it is born, and the mother has to go through the traumatic experience of giving birth to a dead baby. The option for that to happen earlier helps the mother by giving her more time to recover and to prevent any complications for her. She would still have to give birth to it but won't have to carry it for two-three months extra knowing it will die anyway. There's nothing Christian about making people suffer and taking freedom from people. That's why hell is full of righteous Christian's like her.
I'd respect their views if the same people were stood outside care homes and adoption agencies offering support to the babies who have been born. There i said it.
Many of them do.. Some even create programs that support parents-to-be in every way including financially. US needs better care and support for mothers in difficult situations, but it's not like those who are against abortion don't care about the mother. They simply also care about the baby.
They offer adoption and foster help.
Pregnancy crisis centers are everywhere funded by those against abortion.
Sadly those for abortion regularly attack those centers.
Ok, so what you're saying is, in order to be against the killing of unborn humans, I must adopt? Why? How are those two things even related?
Abortion is ending the most innocent of human lives. You can't justify it. You just can't.
I literally do that's what I spend all my free time and money doing. Take your head out of the government-funded media for 10 seconds bro
Exactly! They just show themselves to be miserable, unempathetic, close minded people. Especially that guy saying killing a living toddler is the same as aborting an embryo or ending an unviable pregnacy.
It is pure evil to force a mom to carry to term a baby that will die-holding your child while it struggles for every breath isn’t righteous.
Are you brain dead ?
Mf wtf are you on about
At least read wtf you're typing b4 posting it 😂
@@breaktide251tf, did you reply to yourself?
It's pure evil to kill a defenseless child in the womb!
A woman I knew got pregnant, was overjoyed UNTIL the diagnosis of CANCER was made.
Because abortion was not legally allowed, she DIED, so did her son.
The family of two girls and her loving husband lost her.
Is this acceptable when it's obvious that women who are pregnant have such powerful hormone changes CANCER speeds up? Women die?
My own great-grandmother had an abortion when doctors were so ignorant about reproduction, they had no idea how to help. She died at 93 years old, yes, but couldn't have another pregnancy because it would kill her.
Laws like these ludicrous versions DON'T stop miscarriages, abortion by natural causes. Nature aborts fetal matter in all mammals. We're mammals.
The problem is this is the same sort of case study bs that anti-abortion activists will use. Try and keep to data that proves this is happening at higher rates that the case studies they use to give the feels.
You equated sickness with Abortion....
No religion prohibited treatment of sickness such as cancer even in pregnancy and the outcome can be either the child live or die. This is not Abortion
Abortion is when the mother willfully killed her unborn baby though she has no danger of whatsoever in delivering the fetus.
Natural causes are not man-made causes. That woman could have had her cancer treated, why not? there are plenty of cases having given birth while having cancer, but anyway, abortion is not a right and that was my comment about. For example, taking a driving licence is not a right, it´s a procedure.
So she should have killed her own baby before she died??? What on earth is that logic?
Yeah thats totally the same as a bunch of crazy blue hair feminist activists
Do anti-abortion men know HOW WOMEN FEEL during their pregnancy and giving birth??? It's unimaginably painful and unpleasant, especially, if a biological father is a rapist!
Do the women getting an abortion consider the impact on the father? No.
@@k4p1t4l9Hilarious considering I knew 2 girls who got pregnant in high school and it was their boyfriends who pushed them to get their abortions and the guys happily paid for it.
@@k4p1t4l9 who gives a Damn😂
My wife enjoyed the miracle of childbirth.
I bet you think men can get pregnant lol
@@k4p1t4l9 Many of those fathers don't even want kids to begin with, there are way more deadbeat fathers out there than deadbeat moms, that's a fact, and obviously the women get the last say as it's their bodies. Try to use your two braincells once in a while.
I got a bilateral salpingectomy (tubes completely removed) about a months ago. My doctor is amazing and did it for me without "husband's approval" or making sure I had kids already (I don't). I finally made the decision to get it done because of the lack of abortion healthcare in America. I never want to be pregnant in this country. I didn't want to be pregnant anyway, but it would be a nightmare having an unwanted pregnancy now. So I got my tubes taken out.
Based on how upset you seem at the prospect of being unable to kill your own children in the case you do get pregnant, I think it's for the best.
I hope you at least to him cause looks like you said WITHOUT MY HUSBAND APPROVAL 😢
If I was your husband i would divorce you and find a real woman to be my wife.
hope you are recovering well 💗
@@imperialmotoring3789 loser. I bet you've never had a girlfriend, let alone be able to get a wife...
While I respect the idea of protecting life, many of the pro-life people are also pro-guns. What I find confounding and ironic is that these people are more concerned about embroyes than the lives of children and adults.
FALSE FLAGS DON'T HARM EMBRYOS.
How can these people even claim to be "pro-life" when they literally stand among so many dead bodies?
@@JamesSmith-qs4hx Care to elaborate on your point?
Pro gun means you want the right to defend yourself or your family from harm
Pro choice means you wanna harm your baby
What I thinks ironic
Is people who are pro choice
Don’t consider other options
It’s all my body my choice and no exceptions
I’d be up for putting unwanted babies into military training and education starter camps
And creating born and raised warriors
But
That isn’t a ‘choice’
Pro choice to me is anti accountability
And women should learn to be better gate keepers
Instead of going to the club half naked with their arse shaking
And if they fail at that
Then maybe it’s time for them to learn how to be a responsible human being
And what better way then to be forced to bring up there own god damn baby
You made your bed
Now lie in it
Also same philosophy for druggies
Take crack
But don’t expect me to fund it or the rehab
If your stupid enough to do something
Then Your stupid enough to face the repercussions
A lot of Europeans find it bizarre that Americans think that non military gun ownership is a good thing especially hand guns but the USA is a democracy and it's their choice. If a child was killed by a gunshot it would be a tragedy but it would also be a tragedy to kill that child before they were even born.
Anyone who really believes abortion is murder and wants to prevent it would support birth control counseling, low cost birth control covered by healthcare, sex education, regardless of age. They would also support Universal prenatal and postnatal healthcare, provide healthcare to children, and support subsidized non-profit high quality daycare. To give that baby the “every chance at life”. I have never, ever, heard any pro-life politician or political spokesperson voice support for any of these measures that would easily prevent millions of abortions.
Ending a life is killing.
All of the resources you listed are available.
0 reason to electively kill.
@@susanwest4137the fetus doesn’t even have a life yet, doesn’t even have rights it’s still developing so it’s not murder
@@Catkidnapper89 😂😂😂 ending a life is killing it. Children know this. Time for you to know it too.
Susan at it again😂
@@larawuthrich5106 yes sweetie. Because people with sense know killing is wrong. Sad you missed out.
Those people who harassed women outside the clinic should provide child support to those they support abortion ban. How else can babies survive without nutrition, shelter and clothes/ diapers. If they cannot support the babies, leave women alone to decide for themselves.
I think they just want future slaves born into poverty 😢
it´s true, the state should provide these families, but it´s also right that these women should have been careful, because they can (unless it´s a rape, and that is a crime).
There are many who do. Did you simply assume they didn't or wouldn't? Some even create programs to do this where the state has failed to.
I do.
Most people who are anti-abortion don't, quite the opposite, they're actually against food stamps etc.@@stephenkeen6044
@@stephenkeen6044 Let's face it, that's not enough. It may be enough for 10 women but for 620,327 women who had abortions in the state of columbia in 2020 it is not
It's not allowing the mother to carry to term, it's forcing the mother to do so. It's being legally required. It's not compassion, it's oppression.
You're right a woman should have full control over her own body but we all have the right not to be killed before we're born. The problem is you can't have both of those things so you've got to choose which of those things is worse.
In MOST cases SHE CHOSE to spread her legs open and take that risk to get pregnant. Only less than 1% of unwanted pregnancy is due to rape. The vast majority of women made a conscious decision to take that risk and should deal with the consequences of their actions. If a guy consented to sex but didn't want kids and one was made by accident, HE is forced to deal with the consequences and so should women.
@@sebastianguerre6868I think we should do what the Bible says.
A pregnant woman who is injured and aborts the fetus warrants financial compensation only (to her husband) (Exodus 21:22-25).
The gruesome priestly purity test to which a wife accused of adultery must submit will cause her to abort the fetus if she is guilty, indicating that the fetus does not possess a right to life (Numbers 5:11-31).
Want me to carry on blowing the religious point out of the water?
Who forced her to spread her legs though?? Nobody
@thomaswilliams1823 You know most women who have abortions are in stable relationships and already have kids?
Or do you still believe the 50s bullshit about promiscuity that Reagan blathered about?
It astonishes me that a country which still has the death penalty doesn't allowed abortion in any sense for some states.
Killing innocent babies is different to killing mass murderers.
@@davidrobertsemail agreed, american society forgot what abortion is for
infantcide was legalised for to protect the parent's life, or for incest and rape, not to replace not having sex
How are those things even comparable?
Capital punishment is the killing of the lowest of the low. The most disgusting murders or rapists of our society who deserve nothing but to die.
Abortion is the killing of the most innocent members of our society, who are being murdered by the person who should love and protect them the most.
The idea that abortion and capital punishment are somehow related is flat out disgusting.
@@davidrobertsemail no shut up ignorant abortion is healthcare
State by state, not federal law, do you understand the difference, concerning abortion and the death penalty?
You at least have the humanity of a child dying in their mothers arms. Bruh. How do you even come to such a awful conclusion. Oh yeah instead of letting an adult/mother decide on their own, let's just decide it's best for that person to have a baby die in their arms.
Bruh? Are you homosexual? Who talks like that?
And be able to kiss, hold, and bond with the baby.
What a shame that the pro-birth women don't all have 20 kids by 40. What a let down to their eggs, each is a potential life too. Why are they not blamed for having periods instead of kids?
because they do not kill people?
Because life begins at conception?... It's at that point that it becomes a unique, individual, living human being. That's what the science says.
Did you even listen the the interviewees or just jump in here to post your predictable comments because of the topic?
Sadly, there are lives that are not meant to be. You can say that's God's plan. Who are you to say it's not divine intervention that a pregnancy do not continue to term??
If you refuse to accept that, then all doctors who failed to save any patients, be it adults, children, elderly, should all be punished, without except, cause they "murdered" those people by unable to perform miracles and make them live.
We are all just humans, how dare pro-life people decide to make other humans suffer cause they want to play God and change fate according to their views?
Instead of blame, support those who unfortunately lost their babies out of their control! If you are truly pro-LIFE, that's how you can help.
@@floras2030 I did indeed listen to them. As usual for this topic, the video was very biased towards the "pro-choice" position, creating an emotional reaction instead of a rational one.
"You can say that's God's plan" - I didn't mention anything religious, doesn't need to be brought into the discussion. I mentioned the facts that we know from science. Laws are based on facts and ethics. The fundamental and most significant fact of the discussion is that human life begins at conception (the "fetus" is a living, growing, individual human being). There are of course other facts to consider, but the ethics must be understood with that one always in mind.
What these people leave out is if the baby is gonna put the mothers life at risk, is it really worth it for her dying or having severe body damage even if the baby lives.
Abortions are dangerous for the mother. Some studies show more than giving birth.
Like how? Example please. Way more women have abortions because they forgot contraceptives. That’s not an excuse to murder a child
@@hmmmmm2634 Obstetric emergencies, like severe bleeding and amniotic fluid embolism (when amniotic fluid enters a mother's bloodstream), cause most deaths at delivery.
@@hmmmmm2634 you forgot to cite your source.
@@Pfromm007yea but it’s rare compared to the women having clean births
Pro-life until after it is born. Not pro-life for the women, or the kid after it is born.
Indeed. All about controlling women. Nothing to do with protecting children.
@@titteryenot4524all to do with killing children
I don't want adult women, children or babies killed. What do you mean? You need me to support YOU or something?
@@titteryenot4524 Women need to control themselves and not let every man that smiles at them nut inside them.
@SnydersMemeZone17 Those are facts, not lies
What's really troubling is other nations importing these crazies. I've seen them outside British and Irish abortion clinics, scaring women away
not wanting babies to be killed is crazy. I think you have it backwards
@@ezekielrayfield1512Sticking your nose in other peoples business and what they decide to do with their body is CRAZY.
@@imperialmotoring3789 It's inside her body so it's literally not separate
@@bonvoyage4212 You are literally on my planet and you are literally a moron.
@@imperialmotoring3789 If it can't survive on its own, it's not separate. Plain and simple.
Im sorry but i just have to say that the young woman who talked about "bring back the humanity" by "allowing" a woman to bring a pregnancy to term and seeing that child die in her arms... EXCUSE ME?? This is the type of person who needs to experience the cruelty she inflicts on other women.
I appreciate how humanized this news piece has been, but I also want to know the data; have partial or full hysterectomies gone up since the ban? Have women been dying more due to pregnancy complications? Maybe a sharp uptick in new babies being released to the state? Mental health issues? Substance abuse issues? Have women been moving out of these anti-abortion states? If they can't move... Are there underground abortion providers again?
If it be the case that this information is unavailable because these states are not collecting this information, I would think that would be an important thing to add.
They're collecting the data. The people that did this don't believe research and facts.
Why exactly did the Republicans objecting to the Clinton-pushed Roe v. Wade law? The legal objection was to change the term from 9 months to a normal term (around 24 weeks), and to allow each individual State to determine abortion laws based on local votes. It had nothing to do about banning it nationwide - unless the American public wants to.
And why? Roe v. Wade allowed women to carry a baby to full term, abort it in the last minute right before birth. The truth was that in some states women were encouraged by Planned Parenthood, for money, to be incubators for the Clinton-legalized baby-organ trade carrying babies for 9 months simply so hospitals could profit from the organ trade in the millions. The Rep's argued that this turned abortion into mu_der since the baby was fully conscious at 9 months. Baby organs were openly traded and sold for enormous profits by hospitals across America - a trade considered illegal around the world....
Texas has seen its maternal mortality almost triple in the last year.
Well, the rate of hysterectomies wouldn’t change because there has to be a medical reason and birth control isn’t one of them.
And yes, there has been an increase in maternal deaths as a result of these laws.
It makes me so sick the lack of empathy or humanity people have for mothers who need abortions. Some of them WANT their babies but their told their baby will be born dead. Can someone tell me what is the point of forcing a mother to continue with a pregnancy for a baby that has a 0% chance of being born alive?! I know some religious women want to keep it so it can be baptised, but that's the MOTHER'S choice. Fetal demise is more common than people think. One woman had to wait for the inevitable miscarriage which was very painful. Because she couldn't have an abortion right away (for a baby that was ALWAYS going to die) her chances of having another successful pregnancy had significantly been reduced because her uterus had been damaged. All the abortion law did was reduce her chances of having children.
most abortions are not needs, they are WANTS. Like not wanting to raise a child. Abortions due to health reasons are a very small percentage of abortions.
All abortion restrictions have exceptions for the "life of the mother". Don't you at least agree that "not the right time for a child" and "cannot afford a child" are HORRIBLE excuses for a man or a woman to take the life of their child, born or unborn?
@@mathildeyoung1823 "All abortion restrictions have exceptions for the "life of the mother"-actually that still not fair. Life of the mother and health of the mother are two different things. Putting that simple clause in means women aren't allowed an abortion unless they're at deaths door. And even then doctors can get 99 years in prison if later some faceless court has decided it wasn't necessary, despite the fact they're just lawyers sitting behind a desk, not doctors. So even if it's necessary doctors will still be hesitant. They would have to appeal before and do you know how slow that process would be? All the while an innocent woman is needlessly in pain and enduring more damage to her body.
And even if abortion due to health reasons are small (even though there a great number of women who have these stories) that doesn't mean they don't exist and they should just be ignored. Read my comment again, where in it is a true story of a women who wanted her baby but needed an abortion because her baby was dead and it was damaging her body. OPEN YOUR MIND. Imagine being in her shoes, knowing and just waiting for the corpse in you to be painfully released. Your chances of having another baby are going to be greatly reduced because some senator who doesn't know you has decided you are not important enough.
@@sjn7688 So you're saying you still support restrictions for excuses like money and "don't wanna be a parent" and just want the restrictions to be loosened for health reasons? right?
If a baby is dead removing the baby IS NOT AN ABORTION....
@@mathildeyoung1823 No, I agree. Those are perfectly valid reasons. But I knew focusing on those reasons wouldn't convince them. They're convinced a few cells in the womb are the exact same as a baby. I was just saying needing an abortion for health reasons is more common than people think and people just seem to forget that. Also I meant dead, or going to die, either in the womb or when it's born. But I agree that not having the money or wanting a baby right now is a valid reason
@@sjn7688 A human baby is not a teenager. A human toddler is not an adult. A human embryo is not a newborn baby. SO WHAT? There are differences in all the stages of the life of a human being. None of those differences justify killing. If you ask a pregnant woman how she is doing and she replies "the baby and I are doing fine" do you shout "it's just cells!" or "it's just a fetus" at her?
If it's just a "few cells" then certainly you have to be OK with a man slipping a woman a so-called "safe" abortifacient if he doesn't want a child for right?
Health of the mother accounts for less than 5% of all abortions. Money and "not the right time for a child" are horrible excuses for a man or a woman to kill a child, born or unborn. Killing a child, born or unborn, has the same main result - i.e. a young human being is denied a chance at a full and productive life. That is obviously why abortion needs to be illegal.
Approximately 25,000 children age out of the adoption system every year without ever having found a family. So to the people who want to "flood the market" with infants for all those needing families, just remember, you have been free, for DECADES, to go ahead and adopt. Take care of the children we ALREADY HAVE , FIRST.
There's a wait-list of families wanting to give a newborn a home.
@@anastasiassecret3837 I don't know sweetie. Go adopt a 12 year old.
I don’t see these “pro life” people demanding the death penalty be abolished. It’s “pro life” not “pick and choose life”
Ladies, if there is a chance for you to leave the state (where your body doesn’t belong to you), please do. This crazy bigotry is truly dangerous 😏
Yes, go to California where the state can now by law take away your children if you do not agree to trans puberty blockers which make you sterile. Talk about group psychosis. Elites are eugenicists wanting rid of us 'lesser beings'. Use contraception or close your legs. Doesn't take 9 months to dedide to have an abortion at full term leaving the baby to die.
Why not using contraceptives instead? I did it and have only one child.
@@p.s.1642 Are we meant to use one person's experience as the template for national law?
Leave the country. Go to China . Abortion is loved there!
I had an abortion. I’m happy I did it, I would do it again. Obtaining it was stressful and expensive. About three weeks into the pregnancy it seemed like I might not be able to get the procedure in time so I tried to hang myself. I nearly succeeded. My partner got to me in time and in the end I was able to get the abortion. I would have tried to die again if I had been forced to stay pregnant. Some people shouldn’t be moms, some peoples dna shouldn’t be passed on. My mental health is trash, my whole family has mental health problems. Why would anyone want to put that on a child?
Adoption is a thing hun. There's a wait-list of families wanting to adopt newborns.
@@susanwest4137The earth is overpopulated. There are enoughe babys worldwide in foster care.
Also toodlers, school kids etc. can stay there?
Furthermore between conceving and adoption lays 9 month of pregnancy. Not everybody wants that
@@susanwest4137and they can wait there plenty of other kids waiting to be be adopted
@@Catkidnapper89 , there is 0 justification to electively kill
@@susanwest4137 Yes, like in Africa or Asia, where orphans would die to have financially secure parents. Why have more children when there are children without parents all over the world who need help? If you want to be called humanitarian, at least be not so narrow-minded.
Abortion is Man laws to control women.
Would you please expand on your view.
No, abortion is anti-murder laws. When will you pro-choicers finally realise that we don't care about the women, we care about the child? Every human has a right to life. A woman has a right to do what she wants with her body UNLESS it harms someone else. There's a reason you're allowed to smoke at home and not at a hospital.
Use contraceptives.
Termination applies to both male and female humans so there doesn't seem to be any sexism involved.
@@user-hb2ws3pd2r gurl we abort in cases where life is at serious risk.
and anyway. If pro-lifers would be actual serious on saving lives they would be also for opt out organ donations and against capital punishment but I have yet to meet one that is.
Pro-choice. Like all adequate people ✊🏻
i would say the #inadequate... Adequate would not fear of Life.
We should all aim to be better than "adequate". The life of a human being begins at conception, that's what the science says. We ought not to be making laws based primarily on emotion, but on facts and ethics.
Woohoo yes I am game! I choose to murder everyone I choose. What's my consequences? What's yours. Soon time will tell. The world is changing back to reality and truth, murder is murder. Just perspective right.
It costs about $40k to adopt a child in the U.S. Why is that?
That needs to change... But that's a separate issue that ought to have it's own discussion. The fact of the matter is that human life begins at conception and the right to life applies from that point.
@stephenkeen6044 - Agreed. I believe that adoption is so expensive in order to discourage it. Yes abuse can occur but this is true in any birth and abortion is the ultimate abuse.
It's legalized human trafficking. And it should be illegal. All babies deserve to at least grow up with family not be sold to strangers. If you blocked all adoptions except for true orphans there would be no adoption market and far fewer people who fail school, end up in jail/prison or institutions.
But that is the thing medical bills are expensive and insurrection company are not cheap and don't always pay for medical bills like giving birth. So, retail companies love to put children clothing, nappies, formulas and toys up very high. Then you got other bills like gas, electric, water, mortgages, and more like food are expensive enough and that means parents work longer hours for very little pay and skip meals so their children can get, sleep and go to school.
Also, the number of child abuse is far worse as some people only have children to get benefits and not love, care and be a parent to a child that would love them until that uncaring, and abusive parents kill them. Abortion actually saves lives and dying in their mother's arms is more worse because that is physical abuse to the woman.
I am pro-choice I will accept whatever choice the woman wants. Who are we to listen to someone telling us women what to do with our bodies? My ex-husband told me because he is my husband he can tell me what to do like have seven+ children and to not get a tattoo and ruin my body. Well, it is my body not a man's or anyone else's to do with.
Why are Americans always late to debate stuff? They debated Slavery years after most of Europe and Latin America had already outlawed it.
And once again, they are debating Abortion when most of Europe, Latin America, Oceania, a MAJOR part of Asia and even parts in AFRICA have already made it legal.
Because we, regardless of ethnicity, are Christians and sadly still we need guidance with conviction
@@Rockenster15 “Congress Shall make no law establishing religion”
-First Ammendment of the US Constitution
“The United States of America is in no Motion, a Christian nation”
-Treaty of Tripoly
“E pluriubus unum” (out of many, one) the original motto of the United States until it was replaced by “In God We Trust” all the way until 1956
Of the US population, 60% Is Christian. 60% out of 335 million. That leaves 40%, or roughly 134 million non-Christians in the US
Besides that, most Americans support abortions according to polling. Even Trump refused to outlaw it. What SCOTUS did is just outright political suicide to say the least
If natural processes aborted, who are we to make things tougher and more unpleasant using the Law? That's just political stupidity America.
PRO-CHOICE! ✊ Nobody else's business
It is the business of the babies being killed
@@noahremnek3615There is a difference between an embroy and a baby.
A zygote (a cluster of fertilized cells) is NOT a child, baby or even a human being, it's often not even carried further than 10 weeks and is aborted naturally.
@@noahremnek3615 tell that to Guns&Borders to protect PALENESS from nature on foreign land
@@GKP999 Because someone is less developed than you doesn’t mean you should kill them.
Frankly, no idea why anyone else should be butting in with what a woman does with her *own* body. It’s her choice. Simply no one else’s business. Those who bore on about the “rights of the unborn” seem to be overestimating human life. I’m willing to bet that if you ask 100 people randomly whether they would have wanted to be born (knowing what we do as humans), the vast majority of them would decline the offer. Invariably, it’s those holy rollers who adhere to primitive scriptures written by men thousands of years ago who cause all the trouble here. It’s no accident that abortion rights are such a hot topic in the US, a country with an alarmingly high belief in invisible daddies in the sky. Preventing legal access to abortion doesn’t stop abortions from happening, it just prevents *safe* abortions as women will seek dangerous underground methods if the legal option is denied them. Another thing that’s always confused me in this debate is how the pro-lifers in the US are oh so keen to “protect the life of the unborn” by denying legal access to abortion, but are quite free and easy with the lives of the born, and are all for any Tom, Dick or Dirty Harry buying a gun like they’re buying candy from a store and going out and shooting up a school every other week. Seems like there’s a contradiction there. Personally, my only issue with abortion is pain. Does the unborn foetus feel pain? On this basis, it should be done as early as possible in the gestation but the bottom line here is simple: it’s a woman’s right to choose what she does with her own body.
Did you bother to comment in favour of anyone's right to bodily autonomy when the jab was mandated, despite now current info it does not prevent the spread of infection. Nope, thought not.
@@MG-eh6bx But it wasn’t mandated where I’m at. I know dozens of unjabbed people, including myself! Nice try, though.👍
@@SnydersMemeZone17 Uh huh. And you have no right or say in what a woman chooses to do with her body. It’s simply none of your business. Don’t be stoopid. 🤡
I agree. I could care less what Russia does to the ukraine. None of my business.
@@SnydersMemeZone17 Hate to break it to you, but it's literally inside and living off of her body and abortion isn't murder, it's medical procedure. You are an uneducated degenerate, so a typical pro-birther
Laws and medicine in this country are absurd...
I had open heart surgery and they didn't want to give me opiate pain killers in case I get addicted....
So I suffered in agonizing pain because of hospital policy with opiates...
Apparently me suffering in the hospital and days after is fine because making opiate pain killers so hard to get has totally curbed the opiate problems in this country.......................
Simone Veil, one of the greatest defenders of abortion rights, would be so appalled by the deteriorating situation in the US...
Who is that? Does she do porn?
😂😂😂 elective killing isn't a right
People are so ignorant about the argument behind these laws. Why exactly did the Republicans objecting to the Clinton-pushed Roe v. Wade law? The legal objection was to change the term from 9 months to a normal term (around 24 weeks), and to allow each individual State to determine abortion laws based on local votes. It had nothing to do about banning it nationwide - unless the American public wants to. That's based on individual opinions.
And why? Roe v. Wade allowed women to carry a baby to full term, abort it in the last minute right before birth. The truth was that in some states women were encouraged, for money, to be incubators for the Clinton-legalized baby-organ trade carrying babies for 9 months simply so hospitals could profit from the organ trade in the millions. The Rep's argued that this turned abortion into mu_der since the baby was fully conscious at 9 months. Baby organs were openly traded and sold for enormous profits by hospitals across America - a trade considered illegal around the world....
@@susanwest4137removing someone from your body that you don’t consent to being there is, toots.
@@johnlewis9266 no sweetie it isnt.
If your Anti-abortion, you also support abolishing Medicaid and Medicare and Social Security benefits.
How about financial help to the families whoes women died during childbirth?
You must still live with your mom.
It makes sense why women would want one but for men to support abortion means they don't support equality.
*Abortion Laws in the U.S. in a nutshell:*
Let's say you go the Wendy's I'm working at and I begin making you a burger. You didn't order the burger, you don't want it, and you refuse to pay for it, but the manager will call the cops and have you locked up if you try to stop the burger from being made for you against your will. When the burger is completed after an agonizingly long time and is given to you, it's rancid and shrivelled, like Marjorie Taylor Greene's box. Completely unacceptable for health code standards or social acceptability, but you have to accept it in this establishment. At McDonalds, you can refuse to have it and terminate the unwanted order, but not here at Wendy's.
This analogy is a horrible message lmao
Absurd comparison: it´s a person´s right to live you are talking about.
It's crazy that women not being able to kill their own fetuses in the womb as some form of petty, primitive birth control stirs so much controversy.
If you don't want to have a baby, then don't have sex and get impregnated. There are innumerable prophylactics out there as well. It's really not that difficult. Abortion is not just a tool for lazy women to get rid of babies since they lacked the foresight to not get knocked up in the first place.
@@_ArsNova Why do the people making this argument always make themselves sound like massive incels in the process?
Wtf?
Just donated to this great Orlando group helping support those seeking abortions. Can't imagine encountering this kind of opposition by someone who does not know your situation, and apparently also the moral difference between a 12-week-old fetus and a toddler.
@@SnydersMemeZone17 The projection is real lmao
For what it’s worth, Abortion was not just legal-it was a safe, condoned, and practiced procedure in colonial America and common enough to appear in the legal and medical records of the period. Official abortion laws did not appear on the books in the United States until 1821, and abortion before quickening did not become illegal until the 1860s. If a woman living in New England in the 17th or 18th centuries wanted an abortion, no legal, social, or religious force would have stopped her. When the Constitution was written abortion was acceptable,legal, and practiced.
And something being legal doesn't make it ok.
Abortion isn't safe - it's always dangerous (deadly) to the unborn child.
@@mathildeyoung1823 You only want the unborn children born only so they can suffer. Every abortion saves a child from this world and from God. Many states are putting abortions on ballots to try and legalize it again. Ohio is the next state trying this in November. I hope abortion wins for the child's sake. I would not wish this world on anyone. Hopefully more women will have abortions.
@@susanwest4137actually it does. That's the basis of what makes us a civilized society..the law. Take away the law. See how much you like living in a lawless society. The law prevents your wife and daughter from being raped.
@@ageis3250 "You only want the unborn children born only so they can suffer" - by that "logic" it has to be OK to "humanely" euthanize a baby so they won't possibly suffer in the future... or you have to admit wanting abortion to be legal has NOTHING to do with preventing a child from suffering it has everything to do with a woman being able to kill a defenseless human being to make HER life easier.
If I kick a pregnant woman's abdomen until her child dies or miscarriages, am I guilty of murder or just assault?
🤔 Hmm , well according to the bible if it resulted on the death of the woman you would face the death penalty. However if it only resulted in a miscarriage then the punishment is a fine. So it appears the bible attributed a fetus of less worth than an actual born human.
@@trumpbellend6717😂😂😂 You don't need religion to know elective murder is wrong.
@@susanwest4137
That's true dear 👍"Murder" is the intentional illegal killing of another human being, the intent of an abortion is to remove a fetus from a human being and it is not illegal.
Presumably you will have no problem declaring it immoral to .....
*_"kill all the males from amongst the little ones_*_ and kill every woman who has known a man intimately_
_But keep alive for yourselves all the young virgin girls"_ ( Numbers 31 : 17 )
Everyone who is even remotely afraid and is able to afford it should get their tubes tied or a similar procedure. Hysterectomy is a bigger operation and has more consequences but I underwent it and recommend similar steps for every woman out there. No need to be afraid after its done.
❤yes this is much better than becoming a murderer.
God this is depressing
How is dying at birth humain?!?!?!?
How is being STUPID enough to believe that bs u are told by politicians "humane", cuz that is EXACTLY what u have been told......BS! No Dr would do anything like that! U dishonor yourself & all Medical Professionals! SHAME ON YOU! AND YOUR stupid book of fairy tales! 😡
The girl who said that just sounds brainwashed, she probably doesn’t know how disgusting it sounds
How is dying by an un natural means of abortion, humane??
@@swiater1 it's much more humane because you aren't as far along. A fetus feels nothing compared to that a new born.
People who say that they are pro-life and think so not bc of religion or smth but morality must give free permanent sterilization, castration and condoms for any adult who asks. In reality we see that in countries with banned abortions you have to have children, permission of husband, be 30+ years old to make a permanent sterilization, which is the only 100% way to not have children. So none of that was done bc of life protection. Some people just want to control women and make birth rate higher without permission of pregnant women.
‘Huge step’ as abortion access changes
Tue, 11 July 2023 at 8:12 am AEST
Undated : RU486 abortion pill - medical drugs tablets RU-486
All doctors and nurse practitioners will be able to prescribe the pregnancy termination pills, and all pharmacies can stock it in a major change to abortion rules in Australia.
All doctors and nurse practitioners will be able to prescribe the pregnancy termination pills, and all pharmacies can stock it as new rules are brought in.
Until now, prescribers and dispensers of the two-part medical abortion treatment needed extra certification or registration, meaning only about 10 per cent of doctors and 30 per cent of pharmacists are currently able to deal with the pill.
But from August 1, restrictions around the MS-2 Step will be removed, in a move the government says will “improve equitable access to healthcare for all Australians”.
Nurse practitioners - who represent about one per cent of nurses - will also be able to prescribe the medications under the PBS.
My body my choice
There you are... The fetus in your body is not your body. Its another individual....
like with the vax. The point is that it´s a life you´re talking about.
It's not your body being murdered! When do you think an unborn child should be able to have its life saved?
@@lamaree9808okay the take that out and make it survive? I won't compromise my body for some tissue...
@@dooom3554 if you Don't want to compromise or want to be responsible then you should stop altogether from all your actions that will inevitably leads to the fetus be inside your body.
6:57 insane transition
I like ducks
What is the definition of born? “Born (verb): come into existence as a result of birth.”
What is the definition of birth? “Birth (noun/verb): the emergence of a baby or other young from the body of its mother; the start of life as a physically separate being.”
Given all these current definitions, you do not exist before birth. Your life does not start until you are born. You are not a separate being until after birth.
Set your morals aside from fact, truth, and law. Your personal morals are not the guidelines that everyone needs to follow.
Children are super expensive. Fertilized eggs get stuck in tubes.
Pregnancies stress the body of the woman (like if she has cancer or if overweigh)
If you'd ask a man to be 9 months connected to another man to pump his blood it would be OK if you for any reason needed to disconnect.
Women shouldn't be forced to be baby factories and men shouldn't be forced to pay for the baby.
Unrestricted Abortion needs to be kept legal and child support needs to be abolished.
Women's AND men's liberation go hand in hand.
Medically necessary abortions are available in every state.
Whole world discussing climate change, America still discussing abortion like we’re in the 18th century.
They’re so behind.
If it's not your body, it's not your rules. When do people stop torturing each other ffs, we are going backwards in time
And the baby's body is not the mother's, so in essence I agree. Facts matter, it's not about who can generate the most emotional appeal, it's about facts and ethics. Science says human life begins at conception.
The comments made at 6:32 - Am I the only one who notices the disconnect in what they're saying? Citing 'humanity' is mind blowing 🤯
Previous conversations especially with high risk mom’s and viability of a high risk or non viable infant were discussed regarding decisions to carry the infant to term this allowed the mother to decide on what they wanted to do with the pregnancy given just the facts. That discussion can’t even happen instead we schedule hospice to speak with them to prepare for the unthinkable
What gives anyone the right to tell me what I should do with my insides? At what point am I legally incapable of deciding what happens inside my own body? And who is qualified to decide what decisions are made regarding my body?
The question of whether or not to have an abortion concerns only the mother (and the father, if there is one). Abortion is not something that affects the whole population. It is the responsibility of the mother (and the father, if there is one). It is not like vaccination, where if you are not vaccinated you can put other people at risk. The same goes for gun laws. So the question is, why do you care what other people do with their own lives when it has nothing to do with you? Why do you feel entitled to tell them how to live?
😂😂😂 Elective murder is everyone's business.
@@susanwest4137 Women have the fundamental right to make decisions about their own bodies. Just as people can consent to medical procedures or refuse treatment, they should have the right to decide whether to continue a pregnancy. Plus A woman's decision about whether to have an abortion is a deeply personal matter. Maintaining the privacy of this decision respects her dignity and autonomy. And lastly Unintended pregnancies can occur due to various reasons like contraceptive failure, health complications or RAPE. Abortion provides an option for women and couples to manage their planning and life choices. For example, a child who has experienced rape may not be emotionally or physically prepared to endure a pregnancy and childbirth. Furthermore, expecting her to care for another child at such a young age is unrealistic and potentially harmful. Allowing her to access an abortion is often regarded as the humane and responsible choice.
@@larawuthrich5106 , you're killing females too hun. Where's their choice?
Rape is a very small percentage of abortions done, as you know.
If the pregnancy threatens the mother's life, they can end it without coming to your kill clinic. If the mother doesn't want to be a mother, she can have the baby adopted out.
Should you get the death penalty if your father rapes someone? No because that's silly.
@@susanwest4137 well said
@@susanwest4137well it's really not. My girlfriend had a abortion. You didn't know or had no idea until you just read this. So now you just read this and found out this information, is your life going to be any different??
its pretty simple, the states where the population wants to reduce access can do.. and the states that want full access can do.. that's pretty much the impact roe v wade has had..
//How many parents have been trained by planned parenthood to be better parents? If not then they should change the name to Planned Abotion Hood.///
It's interesting how increasing democracy in terms of aborting unborn children has panned out.
People from the extremes on both sides of the argument have been highlighted frequently in the media. As usual the reasonable approach lies somewhere in between.
I prefer to base decisions on facts. Such as the fact that a "fetus" is a living human being from conception. That's what the science says. This is not "negotiable" or "in dispute", it's factual. Laws are made by considering facts and ethics. So, based on the facts, we can discuss the ethics.
@@stephenkeen6044 I agree, basing decisions on facts is a good idea.
It's nice to find common ground.
@@stephenkeen6044 Well yes, but in desperate situations in which viable fetuses are aborted there is always a good reason for it.
We abort for the same reason why we can't force people to donate organs. As long its in their body its their jurisdiction and when bringing it to term carries a risk of both dying... a choice has to be made.
I mean god damnit. Your argument could work in any other nation but the US. They literally have capital punishment. Sacrificing one life to safe others is their modus operandi.
@@underarmbowlingincidentof1981 Wow, what a fascinating collection of statements. Amazing.
USA is not a democracy though, Thank God.
No problem for the rapist
American turn DEMOCRAZY
-China🇨🇳
You gotta be BORN first to be considered a baby. The definition of a baby is: a very young child, especially one newly or recently BORN (newborn).
You gotta be BORN first to gain citizenship. The 14th Amendment: “All persons BORN or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.”
And lastly, you gotta be BORN first to have human rights. “Universal Declaration of Human Rights - Article 1: All human beings are BORN free and equal in dignity and rights.”
BORN humans have clear and concise statements in all of our declarations. What’s not clear are the rights of UNBORN humans.
The UNBORN might be human beings, but either way - according to our declarations human beings must be BORN to inherit all these rights.
Here’s a great example of clear language protecting UNBORN humans:
Ireland’s 8th Amendment: “To recognise the equal right to life of the mother and the UNBORN.”
Without this kind of language in our declarations - unborn rights are not as clear as born rights. Advocating unborn rights will require reinterpretations of current declarations. Implied interpretations do not override what’s factual and clear: the official definitions of the actual words being used in these declarations. Born rights are clear - Unborn rights must be clear first in order to even debate overturning the rights of the born human carrying the unborn human.
Freedom to people of USA from American democracy...
America is a Constitutional Democrat Republic, not a democracy...geeez..
Can you somehow invoke the "stand your ground" law? I have an intruder in my uterus...
"For You formed my inward parts; You knitted me together in my mother's womb. … Your eyes saw my unformed substance; in Your Book were written, every one of them, the days that were formed for me, when as yet there was none of them" (Psalm 139:13, 16).
crazy place that is. crazy
That’s ok. We’ll just enter through the back door.
That’s between you and God
@@jesseyaw8759 there is no god
@@mitch103178 if you choose to believe that’s that’s up to you but you will come to the realisation at some point . We have a creator and are you willing to take the risk of not trying to know Him .
@@jesseyaw8759 what a perv watching
You wont get pregnant that way!
American Taliban
Let’s call it what it is. The “prolife” side thinks of women’s bodies as host bodies. So if babies and embryos have more rights than their host bodies, are all these people ok to pay more taxes to cover their welfare once they are born? Or is the unborn child only good until they can control the host bodies and then they don’t care about them? Asking for the 2.5 million homeless kids around the nation.
Who Amon you have No Sin Be the One Cast the First Stone.. this is what I remember from the Bible.
No health situation should be judged by the courts or governments. Plus I can't stand the fact of people outside the clinic or posting comments against others in any situation, especially when they are quoting the Bible or religious beliefs... because if they are very religious as they say then what happened to the Do not judge others, Only God has the Right to Judge, and Most Importantly... Who Among you have NO SIN be the One to Cast the First Stone???
I thought all women would be forced to be in Handmaid's Tale clothing by now the way they went on about it...
@@m.zacharias8952 Or to fear monger...
BBC News, biased much?
Quit screaming murder and scream we love you we will help you.
If the mother has the option to opt out of motherhood, so should the father, but people don’t wanna talk about that!!!
I agree. Thr father should also go to prison if he fails to stop the woman from killing his baby!
When a man wants to back off from having a child he should keep it zipped....
@@judyprincehouse8422 You nailed it! Men should not have sex unless they are willing to become fathers.
@@imperialmotoring3789lol. You don’t own sex such that you get to decide when people can have it.
Might as well get over it
@@johnlewis9266 You don't own sex such that when people make a baby you get to kill it.
On demand abortion is morally reprehensible.
So, don't do it
@@user-ns7xr5fq1iMurder is wrong so don’t do it. But if others do it it’s fine.🤡
And America Thinks its a free Country haha
And Liam thinks killing a baby is healthcare!
Do you think men can get pregnant?
It's legal to not have sex
Raising a child costs more than buying a house.
First, it is nonsense to suggest that the law never tells people what they can or cannot do with their bodies. In fact, there are many things which people are not legally allowed to do with their bodies. To name just a few, they cannot sell them for sex, or sell their organs to people who need transplants, or put certain drugs into their bodies.
Oh boo hoo prostitution is illegal 😢
@@Just_a_pickleNothing_her-xv1vw Not the point but okay 😂
How tf do you want me to react?
@@Just_a_pickleNothing_her-xv1vw no idea what you are even talking about
@@MeghanBrowning-cy3tm huh.
I don’t get these pro life people why can’t they just go and help children who live in abusive homes 🤯. What a woman chooses to do with her own body has nothing to do with any religions groups!!
@SnydersMemeZone17 It's literally inside and living off of her body but keep lying to yourself
@SnydersMemeZone17 You're delusional
Why dont we talk more about birth control.
Many pro-birthers want to ban that too
Why can't men wear condoms... wrap it up
Do Americans seriously think 2 dogs, 3 cats and chickens constitutes a farm? So fed up of Americans redefining words willy-nilly!
I can't believe some people still think killing babies is OK. It's so strange!
Do you really think society will be stable if you force women to give birth to babies that they don't want to?
Remember those times when you saw those worst criminals on TV and we always think about blaming the parents? Why would you want to create an environment where this scenario is more likely?
@@inbb510 You make no sense. Be gone.
@@Dani-El. , I don't think you understand the negative long-term societal consequences of forcing women to give birth to babies that they themselves don't actually want.
Women & girls have the right to choose.
Elective murder is not a right.
@@susanwest4137 Abortion is not murder
@@Blue-Eyes2525 ending a life is murder. Since abortion is killing a person, it is murder.
If we are treating a foetus as an actual fully formed human being then surely the doctors who perform then will be murderers too, if the mother suffers some stress and loses the baby by her boss being mean to her the they could be up for murder too. If the woman has an accident and falls over and loses the baby would this be then treated as manslaughter. So many questions to ask and why in the name of god do they still have executions and use the false guise of saying that a baby s innocent. Surely a life is a life regardless of how innocent they are. So hypocritical.
Fairly sure it's only been 6 months
My deepest condolences go out to this woman with a miscarriage. No matter what, this is a very difficult time that I’ve walked through with many of my patients. This example is ridiculous though. I’m a medical doctor and the safest way for a miscarriage to pass is naturally. If this woman is passing the products of conception naturally, this is the best medical option. Mifepristone/misoprostol are the second line treatment options for a pregnancy loss before 12 weeks. Dilation and curettage are third line treatment. This patient had the best outcome after a sad happenstance.
I’m a physician as well. How in the hell are you justifying your statement that allowing a miscarriage to pass naturally is the safest?
The risk of misoprostol is far lower than the risk associated with waiting for miscarriage to pass naturally due to the increased risk of retained fetal tissue or the increased risk of infection from a decaying body. It could take between 1-2 weeks for her progesterone levels to sufficiently drop to cause the menses to start, mate.
Also, you seem to be ignoring the impact of her mental health advocating for “natural” if the patient wants to get the body out of her and move on with her grieving process.
I have serious doubts that you are an OBGYN, let alone a “medical doctor”.
I've had my babies and can no longer have kids. When they overturned Roe, they made it so all women have less rights then dead bodies. At least dead bodies have a say on what is going on with their body. I feel like a second class citizen in my own country, less valuable then a man and only really good for making more babies. And these people really don't care about the human produced from the pregnancy. I'm disgusted.
😂what's rights do dead bodies have that women don't?
Elective baby murder isn't healthcare.
@@susanwest4137 Yes dear.
@@nannywhumpers5702 , your comment doesn't make sense..
@@susanwest4137 It does not, but I had a entire passionate reply and decided you probably wouldn't care, so I just did what my husband does when he thinks I am wrong but doesn't want to argue.
Yes dear.
@@nannywhumpers5702 , yea you can't explain your first comment. It's clear.
Mom said no muddy footprints.
Bad reporting, ignoring patients
No big government, religion or corporation should have any authority over the bodily autonomy of a woman.
Is it legal in any land for a woman to cut off or mutilate any part of her body?
@@swiater1 its legal for her to have operational procedures conducted by medical professionals.
They don't.. they simply make it harder for women to kill their babies..
@@SnydersMemeZone17 shut up. I'm pro women's rights over her own bodily autonomy. Her body, her choice just like my body my choice. No government or religion should take her rights away. Its anti freedom and anti American.
@@Redpilled66😂😂😂 elective murder isn't a right.
Its the Woman's Right to do what she likes its her body. As the law says Life starts at birth not conception!
You sound idiotic, the law does not say that life begins at birth! If life begins at birth than pregnant women wouldn't want prenatal care for the new life inside them, as well as care for their own health!
@@SnydersMemeZone17 So tell me how & where does the sprog grow?!?!?!??!
If the case of rape.its ok to abortion.if the case is used as birthcontrol or just happen because of your lifestyle then its restricted to do abortion.dont you ever think about the baby that breathing in your womb.it could be your bless
you demonstrate that your concern has absolutely nothing to do with the sanctity of life, but instead for retribution based on your perception of “fault”. You are quite clear that saving “lives” only matters to you if it involves hurting those you hold in contempt, which seems to only be women, since your focus on the sex and accusations about her lack of caution conveniently leave out the fact that men are the ones who make women pregnant through their negligent insemination.
Why can't these pro-lifers care about kids who are actually alive? Like the kids being killed in schools? Get a job. Stop harassing people outside health clinics. And of course it's all men.
Thanks for highlighting incompetent doctors who should have taken legal advice on what they could have done instead of getting their advice from CNN and thanks BBC for actually reporting it correctly that it wasn't a "ban on abortion" (as you did for years) but giving it back to the states which is where laws like this were always held. If their citizens dont like it - they have to right to vote them out.
Avoiding pregnancy has never been easier….take some personal responsibility and act like a grown up.
But abortion keeps irresponsible women out of the gene pool.
@@stephendalton1648this is why planned parenthood was started by eugenicists.
And what about the men taking responsibility? It takes 2 to tango.
Ask women who have children to ask their children what they think of abortion and if they wanted their mother to abort them
I’ve lived with a mother who ever wanted me. I would have preferred abortion that to live life with a mother that resented having to have me.
Aabortion will go down in history as the Greatest Holocaust of all time
Like god(hitler) and the flood? Hypocrites you whole lot
When? Abortion has been a thing since the sone age
It' not your body, therefore there shouldn't be a choice to kill an innocent child.
Literally what I'm saying. Your right to bodily autonomy stops when it begins to affect someone else's
until the 6th month the fetus cannot survive outside of the womb in any circumstances, until it reaches the point it can it's no different than a parasite and the bodily autonomy is with the carrier. Stop pushing your bigoted and ignorant views that cause the deaths and suffering of women.
I also wonder if your child/wife is raped and becomes pregnant if you'll be singing the same story, especially if it incestual or can result in your child/wife's death.
Bodily autonomy supersedes right to life. The right to life does not include the right to someone’s organs. We can’t even force people to give blood. Also, embryos are not children. Embryonic tissue does not possess the capability to be innocent or guilty.
@@user-hb2ws3pd2rA fetus is only human in species, it is not a person, nobody is until born/birthed. 🤦♀️
@@ShowMeSomething1 Scientifically, that's not correct. The word fetus literally means offspring.