Wow. Peter have come a long way. Look even Destin commented on his video. You know, i remember it's like 3 years ago when he had like 40k subs now it's up to millions.
When things were at their very worst: 2 Suns, Cross in the sky, 2 comets will collide = don`t be afraid - repent, accept Lord`s Hand of Mercy. Scientists will say it was a global illusion. Beware - Jesus will never walk in flesh again. After WW3 - rise of the “ man of peace“ from the East = Antichrist - the most powerful, popular, charismatic and influential leader of all time. Many miracles will be attributed to him. He will imitate Jesus in every conceivable way. Don`t trust „pope“ Francis = the False Prophet - will seem to rise from the dead - will unite all Christian Churches and all Religions as one. One World Religion = the seat of the Antichrist. Benedict XVI is the last true pope - will be accused of a crime of which he is totally innocent. "Arab uprising will spark global unrest - Italy will trigger fall out" "The time for the schism in the Church is almost here and you must get prepared now." The Book of Truth.
Peter-Peter, this is wild!!! You just opened the door to an entire new world. This is going to be be one of those life changing innovations. I pray that you succeed beyond any of your expectations.
Samm Sheperd had a similar idea, but instead used one big motor, highly recommend you check out the videos he made before passing. ua-cam.com/video/SikMdWuhyKM/v-deo.html
Yeah saw this years ago and kinda wish I could try it.. i tried to think of the negatives, like the parachute ripping, or running into some trees or powerlines or the motor just dying ua-cam.com/video/rvQ9DjJNal0/v-deo.html
I would highly suggest adding some sort of protection for the user. Like a lightweight wall between the motors and the user. I fear someone can be basically stabbed with shrapnel from any motor blades if there is some sort of catastrophe. You have to think like this. If one motor destroys their blades, those blades can cause a chain reaction of damage in other motors. That’s a lot of shards to throw at the back of a user.
WHO IS GOD ? The concept of God is summarized in the Quran as: { “Say, He is God, the One. God, the Absolute. He does not give birth, nor was He born, and there is nothing like Him.”} (Quran 112:1-4)
As a mechanic I can confirm, loctite won’t do it. Go with JB Weld. I’ve seen more than one SBC 350’s glued back together with that stuff. 50,000 miles strong and no signs of splitting.
I like the general idea and I propose an improvement: Try to get the propellers out of your back, and put them around it. It will take more space but the propellers will have free wind flow for more eficiency
This is brilliant. When we were kids jumping off of a roof with a poly sheet as a "parachute " and not breaking our legs as we augered in was an achievement. Loved this.
Wow I thought I was the only one who did this. One day I looked out my window up 10 stories high with a garbage bag in my hand ready to try to parachute. Thank god I didn’t jump that day.
I am probabily as old as your grandpa's dad. You have brought me wonderful memories of jumping from the roof of my house with a white sheet wrapped around a bamboo frame. Great work!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'd say this fellow is easy to overestimate. Time, resources and piece of mind. . . and he comes up with a suicide machine. I have those things and I proved there is a God.
For better airflow use a honeycomb configuration. Also, move the motors from the centre column to the outer edges (it looks like there is plenty of room for that, especially with a honeycomb config)
Too cool Daddy-0 !! I love seeing how you turn an idea into reality!! I’m 66 years old and I know that’s a cop out, but keep up the great work! My generation really left a mess for y’all but videos like this give me hope! Thank You!! 🙏
@@jacktaler7136 There are two types of people who would: _An honest UA-camr, pinning their comment on their own video with a link to another of their videos._ Or: _An attention seeking git who makes a bot to spam thousands of comments linking their videos that nobody here is interested in due to unrelated subject matter._ This person here I have seen post links for months on wildly varied types of content, even across two videos from two different channels with different subject matter within like a minute of each other. Best you either report them or ignore, the same as reporting those "pron-bots" you see with like two thousand emojis of hearts and flowers and a NSFW profile picture and premade comment contents.
Four things you could improve. Although the last is more of a guess than an estimate. 1. Remove the middle vertical row of motors and props, they won't be as effective as your body blocks much of the airflow. 2. Use 25% larger props and engines (but with just the 2 vertical rows on each side) 3. Make ducts with a hexagon exterior and then you can have a more ridged frame and possibly a better more compact motor layout. 4. Add a slight (+ or - 10%) steering channel and have the right or left motors spin up or down slightly to give you better directional control?
The ducts make it safe, not just efficient. Still want that efficiency, of course. Might consider moving the motors out to the sides and leaving a strip with no motors behind the pilot. There is not much airflow through there.
The interesting thing is you could do two larger ducts say 18" across and put one under each arm to improve airflow around you body. The pack would not put all the weight behind you then.
I thought the same thing. As I go through the landings, I wonder if that doesn't make a danger to you or the craft if you fall. To reduce damage possibility to the blade frame you could gap, covered or uncovered, the ducts on sides as they reach the fans, to allow some pinch movement, with some risk of other things or personal parts getting pinched. I was also thinking put the fans in a vertical halo form, and just gapping behind him, but then I think you're risking running into size difficulties and controlling the chute when transitioning.
@@david7384 I had seen them but they're a different design. The entire fan is used in that design, even when there is muting of the airflow behind the body, because the blades are flanking and above as well in their cycle. Those engines directly behind are only always pulling around the body, and that seems to us to reduce their efficiency, I believe for the drag across the torso.
These videos are endlessly entertaining but the more I watch, the more I am aware of just how much time and effort you put into making them. Not just the builds but the filming and editing as well. Thanks for making these. Thumbed and subbed!
@@up4open763 Yawwwn. My point is he's built actual planes from scratch. He showed how much calculations and planning went into it. It's not just a matter of "throw it together and it'll work 'cause flight is easy"...
You may not know this, but brushless PWM motors have an optimal speed/blade pitch for differing densities. If you run them at their peak operating point per fan curve data, you can switch on and off fan banks and a constant RPM/pitch angle and optimize your current use for the same thrust, thus giving you longer run time on the same batteries. This is one of the reasons modern prop airplanes have both adjustable prop pitch and rpm.
All kidding aside, if it get into the air it's super safe as it's a chute. The most dangerous part are risk of fire because lithium bats and not noticing you can't get full lift and catch a foot in something during launch.
This is kinda what I do for a living I’m an electro Tech , I build circuit boards to huge power banks and controllers etc etc . I don’t think folks appreciate the time Peter puts into this . The wiring in itself is a undertaking, very nice my friend very nice!!!!!
Looks like a project, but I would suggest erasing the fans in the middle of your body as they are shielded by it and can provide less drag as the other more exposed ones as the air flux is denser and can therefor provide more pulse.
I just noticed this from the cross section of the duct you were showing and it makes perfect sense lol…the ducts you used are airfoil shaped, they are just circular! Literally a perfectly round airplane wing!
You might want to see if 3D printing a hexagon duct will let you stack/configure them more effeciently and add ridgidty to your duct system. Like a bee hive.
@@2S1L3NT hex pattern on the outside and circle on the inside. this way the sections don't slide around. a more sturdy rod for the fans to sit on would help a lot too. likely a pressure/snap into place fit where each section has it's own rod it sits on. these could be 3d printed too. create a attachment clamp, 3d print that, this will hold the fan to the rod. drill or leave hole for the wires from the fan to go through. this way each section is self contained. can make nearly any shape with a 3d printer so might as well take advantage of that fact and allow the sections to connect to each other and add strength to the entire thing.
@@bushgreen260 i don't know about a lot more, his current frame setup is quite heavy and pretty much all of that wouldn't be needed with the hex pattern design. as you can just screw/bolt/glue them together. the frame is the fan housing. instead of how it currently is, there is a metal frame that holds all of the rather lose fan housings. it needs to be sturdy, extra weight can be balanced out by having a more effective design that doesn't have lose fans with better air flow then the current setup has.
@@rocksfire4390 yes but you ate saying a hex pattern on the outside and a circle on the inside. You wnat to do both at the same time so obviously it will add more weight.
there's loads of ways you could improve the performance of this, like moving the ones blocked by your body and improving duct prop fit. would be even better with the drone motors from the santa slay build, just need a couple and you would be off
Even if I had a brilliant engineering mind like this I'd never have the patience to make and put together all of these small parts. People like this leave me in awe .
Never thought I'd see Tucker on Peter Sripol's channel! I must say that I've never envied a harness more after seeing three really cute guys use it. LOL!
Great video - the mattress is interesting :) I fly with electric motors and I can advise. The engines directly behind your seat are not efficient because you are unknowingly creating a closed system (it's about the same as blowing your mouth into the sailboat you're sailing on) and some sort of "confusor" on every engine doesn't really help. The classic paramotor with one large propeller does not have this problem, because its blades extend beyond the profile of the seat and there is no thrust in the center of the propeller. You have only two options - move your propeller "mattress" far back, or reduce the number of engines to 2 with higher power, which will be spaced apart to a larger spacing of your back (the diameter of one propeller should be 28 "). Both propellers should rotate against each other - it eliminates the gyro effect.No "confusors" or two propellers on one axis of the engine, because it has no noticeable effect. :)
I wonder if he took half of them off and removed the ones behind his body and spaced them out more if it would fly better and last longer due to less weight and better efficiency and everything you mentioned.
@@JaredConnell Pokud by to udělal, získal by větší tah při stejné síle. To je vyzkoušené. Malé vrtule nejsou špatné, ale to by autor musel vyrobit něco podobného, co najdete na open ppg.
@@ChessMasterNate In practice, this is done by placing the propeller with an electric motor on a rod 0.75 m long behind the pilot's back. This propeller has folding blades like an umbrella, which expands by centrifugal force when the electric motor is switched on. In the motorless flight mode, the propeller folds down again like an umbrella thanks to the spring. In the case of a "mattress", it would be necessary to relieve it of the unnecessary things I mentioned somewhere and, of course, to move it away from the pilot's back (if he insisted on his concept). The partial rotation of the pilot to the right and left, as I noticed in the video, is due to the higher center of gravity, so something in this direction would have to change to prevent this. The pilot of a classic paramotor must be able to cope with the gyro effect of his propeller, so it is again up to the pilot and his experience.
Peter, I can't wait to see version 2 of your electric paramotor. I've thought a lot about building an electric paramotor and I really think two counter rotating props is the way to go. That way you wouldn't need to worry about designing in torque steer correction into the frame. You should consider watching the "Insights Into Paramotor Geometry" series that Miro (creator of Scout Paramotors) released on the Scout Aviation UA-cam channel.
As a 3D modeler/animation artist I spend my time thinking on new designs all the time. Looking at a flying drone motor with 50 makes me wonder of another way to produce the same force needed with just 8 motors. I found this video interesting. The idea sounds interesting.
From an Australian Peter to an American Peter, Congratulations on your creativity and ingenuity. Seems to me that you have the ability to achieve some great things in life.
You are doing what every kid dreamed about doing. Having only worked on UL,'s, with all the pre cut pieces and proven designs, I can appreciate the amount of work you're putting into these projects. Actually I don't how you're so productive but we're enjoying the ride right along. I think in Latin you'd be called a Vicarious Icarus :)
I don't really know anything so i have to ask: would it make a difference to put the motor units in a hexagonal pattern rather than square? I imagine you'd get more motors in a smaller surface area, and a hexagon would probably be more comfortable than a big rectangle
Yeah the bottom corners of the square could chop up your fingers pretty easily. I wonder if stacking 2 motors front to back would help also? Idk I'm not a expert on such things but I want this idea to take off lighter para motors would mean more people can fly.
That looks like a big improvement in paramotoring, its a lot safer not having a giant slicer/dicer on your back. Plus you can shut off the power instantly. You just need more power somehow, maybe more batteries and stronger motors.
Thats a really good observation about the safety of multiple small rotors as opposed to one deadly one. i wonder why no company has made gas powered multi rotor ones? Like a gas generator i should say unless they found a way to make a load of driveshafts work on one engine haha
After I found out who you went training with I felt like I missed out by not learning with them this summer. Went with a locally based instructor instead. I too, live in Ohio 😆 Maybe I'll see you up there some time. Just watch out for me if you're about to launch some rockets.
Congratulations to you and your team on this creative success. It looks like a George Jetson urban aerial vehicle is not far off. Maybe drone power will be the personal mode of travel.
My immediate thought after seeing the setup for the first time was that the batteries will drain quickly but also that the sail is massive and I wonder if there's any flexible enough lightweight solar cells or membranes you could fit onto it to essentially turn the wing into one massive solar panel to continually charge the batteries?
I learnt to paramotor 15 years ago in Thailand. I did not really enjoy it that much but with an electric motor it would be a whole different experience.
Nice proof of concept, I’m excited to see what mk.2 brings! I wonder if you could get a bigger prop turning slower to make less noise. I fantasize regularly about being able to fly hearing only the wind.
You mean like the propellers used on those powered paragliders? Like on the one he has? He puts the proper propeller pack for it on near the start of the video there somewhere. Yeah it's not a new idea, and it's kinda getting away from the multi drone-propeller idea there.... but that's probably a good thing, it's been well tried already and there's good reasons they're not used. But yes those proper powered parachute/paragliders are pretty awesome contraptions and must give a close sensation of flying like a bird. :) I've got a couple little microlights on one of my properties that I fly sometimes.... which are kinda in-between a powered paragliding and an ultralight or small plane. More comfort and range and manoeuvrability and all that than a paraglider... probably a good deal safer too. But still have a very light, small, open-plan frame and gibe a strange sensation sort of like flying around on an outdoor lounge chair. 😏 You really feel the environment around you, all the wind and moisture and air pressure and dust and insects etc. Wouldn't want to cross the Atlantic in one but hella fun. And quite useful on the land. Safe too. Even if you pass out or something it'd pretty much just glide down and land itself eventually. Long as you don't hit any trees or anything. Have a go if you get the chance.
Hi mate, fantastic project. Check your locate strengths.. Some are designed to be removed with heat, some is permanent. Make sure it's a thread locker type for screws and drip it onto the screws from the tip down. You don't need much and not all loctite is for the same application. You'll get a much better result. Cheers
Super Rad!!! Also awesome to be surprised with the Tucker collab! Silly extra credit idea for the next build: Tune the PVM for each motor at the controller or through an intermediary controller that selects motors speeds from a hash table of specified frequencies. So that at different throttle positions the motors are making harmonious tones rather than wheezy whines. With so many motors it should be possible to have some mega lush tones that would blow peoples minds. Extra Extra credit: Make the motors play music. This would be the same way people get their scanners to play music only scaled up to all of the motors. If appropriate songs are selected within the proper frequency range that overlaps with the frequency range of the motors maximum power output the contraption should be able to fly while playing music at the same time.... maybe... at least it sounds great on paper :)
Well, this was incredible! Everyone else can stop making videos now. My apologies if this has been said tons before - but I wondered if you might get a any difference in thrust with the motors that are behind you configured to the sides of you versus behind you? Nice work, thank you, and good luck!
A dream with just enough physics and duct tape to stick together and fly! You’ve found Einstein’s sweet spot: ‘Everything should be as simple as possible, it no simpler.’
So epic, you are a mad man Peter! Thanks for having us, was an honor to fly this creation.
As soon as I saw this I thought of you. And the killer mustache too!
Kinda expected you'd watch this vid but kinda not
Well flown. Having fun watching you out west, btw. Taking notes on where I should take my motor next. 🤙
Your the dude with the plane thing
So epic, you are a mad man Tucker! Thanks for having me, was an honor to read your comment
This is awesome. I look forward to following this project.
first 😆 I love your content.
Hey it’s destin with smarter every day!
Wow. Peter have come a long way. Look even Destin commented on his video. You know, i remember it's like 3 years ago when he had like 40k subs now it's up to millions.
Tucker gott 1.4k likes on his comment 😮😬
Hybrid airplane or paramotor.... Gas electric....
He looks like he’s escaping with the Costco 50 pack of toilet paper
The opportunity to fly was incredible
Called a mini para motor maybe 🤣🤣
One could say you got your money’s worth
hi i m from india
I might not be a little kid anymore, but I felt like one when I watched this
Just don't serch *i feel fantastic* on UA-cam
@Stupidity And E.L.K. Comedy gold That’s because it’s some guy from a foreign country trying to scam people
@@louispapito1586 lol scammer bot lol
@Stupidity And E.L.K. Comedy gold He’s probably just too busy worshipping a cow or something
When things were at their very worst:
2 Suns, Cross in the sky, 2 comets will collide = don`t be afraid - repent, accept Lord`s Hand of Mercy.
Scientists will say it was a global illusion.
Beware - Jesus will never walk in flesh again.
After WW3 - rise of the “ man of peace“ from the East = Antichrist - the most powerful, popular, charismatic and influential leader of all time. Many miracles will be attributed to him. He will imitate Jesus in every conceivable way.
Don`t trust „pope“ Francis = the False Prophet
- will seem to rise from the dead
- will unite all Christian Churches and all Religions as one.
One World Religion = the seat of the Antichrist.
Benedict XVI is the last true pope - will be accused of a crime of which he is totally innocent.
"Arab uprising will spark global unrest - Italy will trigger fall out"
"The time for the schism in the Church is almost here and you must get prepared now."
The Book of Truth.
Y’all sure do live your lives to the fullest
So Peter, you weren't joking when you made that comment about the EDF's
I love your channel Integza
Now it's time for you to make a rocket and fly it!
he said he was going to afterburn them and he still has to do that
Integza, fancy seeing you here
Interza now is ur time to shine. Build a turbojet rig just like this. After that put a afterburner. 🤣
Thanks for having tucker and I! The opportunity to fly it was incredible! My impressions just went live on my channel today too :)
I hope Tucker takes better care of you then he did Jacqueline
Hey its the methed out harry potter!
tucker and me*
@@moretrash4you damn 💀
Oh so THAT's why people have more than one or two children...
You’re a legend man. I should fly more.
Flying arrow fishing sounds like a view magnet.
Hey, didn't think I'd see you here 👋
“It can fall off and catch on fire, and I’d be fine.”
If it catches on fire but doesn’t fall off, however…
"Look mom,a wishing star!"
Peter-Peter, this is wild!!! You just opened the door to an entire new world. This is going to be be one of those life changing innovations. I pray that you succeed beyond any of your expectations.
"redundancy is key, just like when one of your kids gets hit by a buss you have more :). thanks peter for the great video
What's to like about that comment.?
Creepy narcissist fan club emerging here?
There are a bunch of bots going around here, try to report then when you can
@@thegardensentinel A redundant amount of fans
I KNEW if anybody did this, it would be you! 😂 I gotta try it, man!
First
Samm Sheperd had a similar idea, but instead used one big motor, highly recommend you check out the videos he made before passing.
ua-cam.com/video/SikMdWuhyKM/v-deo.html
Yeah saw this years ago and kinda wish I could try it.. i tried to think of the negatives, like the parachute ripping, or running into some trees or powerlines or the motor just dying ua-cam.com/video/rvQ9DjJNal0/v-deo.html
@Derrick Wayne Hello, I've been tradiing on my own haven't made much, please how do I get to him?
@Derrick Wayne thanks so much I just confirmed it, you deserve an accolade!!!
I would highly suggest adding some sort of protection for the user. Like a lightweight wall between the motors and the user. I fear someone can be basically stabbed with shrapnel from any motor blades if there is some sort of catastrophe. You have to think like this. If one motor destroys their blades, those blades can cause a chain reaction of damage in other motors. That’s a lot of shards to throw at the back of a user.
I'm so excited for your future projects Peter, the creativity never ends!
vay be Türk izleyici varmış
@SESE... 💕 what's with the bot party what
Peter you’re insane 😂 this is awesome
oh, hey there
WHO IS GOD ?
The concept of God is summarized in the Quran as:
{ “Say, He is God, the One. God, the Absolute. He does not give birth, nor was He born, and there is nothing like Him.”}
(Quran 112:1-4)
He lost me at Carbon footprint
@@libtardwhispererllc1272 true
As a mechanic I can confirm, loctite won’t do it. Go with JB Weld. I’ve seen more than one SBC 350’s glued back together with that stuff. 50,000 miles strong and no signs of splitting.
I like the general idea and I propose an improvement: Try to get the propellers out of your back, and put them around it. It will take more space but the propellers will have free wind flow for more eficiency
Wouldn't that just create a vacuum right behind your back?
I was replying with the same comment when I saw yours. Absolutely, the propellers' being blocked by his body are wasting a lot of energy.
Or just save weight and do away with the said propellers altogether
I was about to say the same thing! Also would reduce the strain on those motors, reducing power consumption and extending battery duration.
Havent we learned from icarus lol
This is brilliant. When we were kids jumping off of a roof with a poly sheet as a "parachute " and not breaking our legs as we augered in was an achievement. Loved this.
@Zack Of All Tradesooof,lol.
wow. kids. i used an umbrella. still have my two legs.
Wow I thought I was the only one who did this. One day I looked out my window up 10 stories high with a garbage bag in my hand ready to try to parachute. Thank god I didn’t jump that day.
@@freddybob807 what happened
Where did u get all those motors
I am probabily as old as your grandpa's dad. You have brought me wonderful memories of jumping from the roof of my house with a white sheet wrapped around a bamboo frame. Great work!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Even tho it’s made with hot glue and some sketchy things I’d probably trust it because Peter made it👍🏼!!
Your trust-misplaced 😂😂😂
@@louispapito1586 you cant control me
@@louispapito1586 yea scammer
@@louispapito1586 search for how to fix a broken neck because thats what im going to give you
@@PeterSripol how do you just have em dashes on hand like that tf??
Sounds like a sneezing banshee
Ha! Not screaming but sneezing; yep!
Ye
Couldn't have said it better.
@@DnMelon x
Bless you
Never underestimate a man with a few resources, time and enough piece and quiet to let his mind work! Awesome!
I'd say this fellow is easy to overestimate. Time, resources and piece of mind. . . and he comes up with a suicide machine. I have those things and I proved there is a God.
Hey there’s a crossover episode that I never thought I would see!
He used to be a part of FliteTest. I'm not sure why he left.
Love it Peter!!! Ha man, always a good, and sketchy time!! Hahaha glad those motors went to good use! 🙌💪
Tucker gott 2.6k likes on his comment 😮😬
i have a challenge for yall at flight test. make a paper airplane that can exceed mach 1
Yessir
Hi
Gave it a dislike since he didn’t give the motors to the kids.. homeboy made lots of money off that video . Hitting that do not recommend button
I remember this channel when he had 10k subs. He is very smart and his dad really helps him succeed. Way to go on your Chan growth. 🤩 🎉
Love the FPC patch on the helmet. I just became an even bigger fan than I was before.
Y'all shouldn't support federal prison camps
@@twosquids Only for my political opponents
I feel like the Venn diagram of engineers and /k/ is a circle.
"I live in a tiny house" (with a 5,000 square foot workshop behind it)
Hey man, priorities
For better airflow use a honeycomb configuration. Also, move the motors from the centre column to the outer edges (it looks like there is plenty of room for that, especially with a honeycomb config)
Can't be any wider than your arms can hold the risers apart on launch.
@@matoko123 A honeycomb configuration will compensate for that because it will be more compact. Also, he still had plenty of room to spare.
@@TonyGrant. Yes, you're probably right. :)
for a better engine just dont' fuck with this at all, anyone can make an engine run a few minutes off anything
@@allenhaywood9608 What?
The fact that you can make this with duct tape, recycled motors and a 3d printer is incredible.
And a $1000+ parachute and harness.
why should that be incredible?
first of all you do have to collect all this stuff and invest many hours of work
it is just the logical result..
@@redacted25353 THIS!! x9000+
Too cool Daddy-0 !! I love seeing how you turn an idea into reality!! I’m 66 years old and I know that’s a cop out, but keep up the great work! My generation really left a mess for y’all but videos like this give me hope! Thank You!! 🙏
liar
When a video starts with: "Hahaha, this is so stupid!" , you know you klicked the right video :D
I feel like every video by Peter should at some point include flight of the valkyries
ua-cam.com/video/6_2lhsDYTJUe/v-deo.htmlhehe
who would just link their own video randomly in a commebt
@@jacktaler7136 There are two types of people who would: _An honest UA-camr, pinning their comment on their own video with a link to another of their videos._
Or: _An attention seeking git who makes a bot to spam thousands of comments linking their videos that nobody here is interested in due to unrelated subject matter._
This person here I have seen post links for months on wildly varied types of content, even across two videos from two different channels with different subject matter within like a minute of each other. Best you either report them or ignore, the same as reporting those "pron-bots" you see with like two thousand emojis of hearts and flowers and a NSFW profile picture and premade comment contents.
Four things you could improve. Although the last is more of a guess than an estimate.
1. Remove the middle vertical row of motors and props, they won't be as effective as your body blocks much of the airflow.
2. Use 25% larger props and engines (but with just the 2 vertical rows on each side)
3. Make ducts with a hexagon exterior and then you can have a more ridged frame and possibly a better more compact motor layout.
4. Add a slight (+ or - 10%) steering channel and have the right or left motors spin up or down slightly to give you better directional control?
armchair expert
Much of what I was thinking. Especially #1 which immediately came to mind. But he has a great imagination!
Agree perfectly
i was thinking about the hexagonal, triagonal arrangement too. too many good reasons, structural and dynamical and more...
@@EazyDuz18Well you being an armchair idiot, it balances out
America needs people willing to experiment, invent, and innovate. I watch lots of your videos and they are awesome 👌 😊 Thanks Peter
The ducts make it safe, not just efficient. Still want that efficiency, of course.
Might consider moving the motors out to the sides and leaving a strip with no motors behind the pilot. There is not much airflow through there.
As a fan of Peter, Tucker, and Judson this makes me so incredibly happy!!! 😎🤙
Peter is the kind of guy to hammer screws into a hole too small successfully. This guy's work honestly is nearly impossible. Bravo. 👏
“Hammer screws”
@@zainzwerschke5484 Carpentry 9000
Tucker and Peter together in one video, doesn't get much better than that.
The interesting thing is you could do two larger ducts say 18" across and put one under each arm to improve airflow around you body. The pack would not put all the weight behind you then.
I thought the same thing. As I go through the landings, I wonder if that doesn't make a danger to you or the craft if you fall. To reduce damage possibility to the blade frame you could gap, covered or uncovered, the ducts on sides as they reach the fans, to allow some pinch movement, with some risk of other things or personal parts getting pinched. I was also thinking put the fans in a vertical halo form, and just gapping behind him, but then I think you're risking running into size difficulties and controlling the chute when transitioning.
Does this whole comment section just not know about paramotors lol
@@david7384 I had seen them but they're a different design. The entire fan is used in that design, even when there is muting of the airflow behind the body, because the blades are flanking and above as well in their cycle. Those engines directly behind are only always pulling around the body, and that seems to us to reduce their efficiency, I believe for the drag across the torso.
@@up4open763 haha yeah that's my point.. This is just recreating a worse paramotors
It would also reduce underarm perspiration…
Це виглядає насправді чудово. Просто і дієво!!! Кожний може злетіти в повітря!
These videos are endlessly entertaining but the more I watch, the more I am aware of just how much time and effort you put into making them. Not just the builds but the filming and editing as well. Thanks for making these. Thumbed and subbed!
@USCG veteran Christian gamer 1977 keep your negative comments to yourself curmudgeon
damn
I feel like this is the Minimum Personal Flight Requirement, and it's really impressive to see how little it takes to achieve flight
Not really. They used an existing paraglider & harness with the thousands of hours of engineering that went into its design.
@@Vousie I await your video of clothes-pins and yarn harnessing CPU fans on AAA batteries.
@@up4open763 Yawwwn. My point is he's built actual planes from scratch. He showed how much calculations and planning went into it. It's not just a matter of "throw it together and it'll work 'cause flight is easy"...
You may not know this, but brushless PWM motors have an optimal speed/blade pitch for differing densities. If you run them at their peak operating point per fan curve data, you can switch on and off fan banks and a constant RPM/pitch angle and optimize your current use for the same thrust, thus giving you longer run time on the same batteries. This is one of the reasons modern prop airplanes have both adjustable prop pitch and rpm.
I unironically appreciate the fact that you guys put science / curiosity before safety
All kidding aside, if it get into the air it's super safe as it's a chute. The most dangerous part are risk of fire because lithium bats and not noticing you can't get full lift and catch a foot in something during launch.
You guys do the silliest stuff taken to serious levels.
When i first saw the thumbnail,i thought that you're carrying toilet paper.
Me too
This is kinda what I do for a living I’m an electro Tech , I build circuit boards to huge power banks and controllers etc etc . I don’t think folks appreciate the time Peter puts into this . The wiring in itself is a undertaking, very nice my friend very nice!!!!!
Please send me the link to your videos about similar electric experiment.
I will be your subscriber😃
Восхитительно.
Моменты из мастерской очень похожи на Гранта Имахару и разрушителей мифов.
Yeah it is very similar
والدتك
@@joelbalsters5352 no your mom
@@Skoopyy. the internet is truly an amazing thing…
?????)
Pretty cool. But I would go crazy from the sound.
Looks like a project, but I would suggest erasing the fans in the middle of your body as they are
shielded by it and can provide less drag as the other more exposed ones as the air flux is denser and can therefor provide more pulse.
Keep perfecting it! We'll come back for your Part 2! Great show!
I just noticed this from the cross section of the duct you were showing and it makes perfect sense lol…the ducts you used are airfoil shaped, they are just circular! Literally a perfectly round airplane wing!
You might want to see if 3D printing a hexagon duct will let you stack/configure them more effeciently and add ridgidty to your duct system. Like a bee hive.
He literally just said he's losing thrust because the blades aren't close enough to the sides of the duct, so...
A hex is going to be worse.
@@2S1L3NT
hex pattern on the outside and circle on the inside. this way the sections don't slide around. a more sturdy rod for the fans to sit on would help a lot too. likely a pressure/snap into place fit where each section has it's own rod it sits on. these could be 3d printed too. create a attachment clamp, 3d print that, this will hold the fan to the rod. drill or leave hole for the wires from the fan to go through. this way each section is self contained.
can make nearly any shape with a 3d printer so might as well take advantage of that fact and allow the sections to connect to each other and add strength to the entire thing.
@@rocksfire4390 it will add a lot more weight
@@bushgreen260
i don't know about a lot more, his current frame setup is quite heavy and pretty much all of that wouldn't be needed with the hex pattern design. as you can just screw/bolt/glue them together. the frame is the fan housing. instead of how it currently is, there is a metal frame that holds all of the rather lose fan housings.
it needs to be sturdy, extra weight can be balanced out by having a more effective design that doesn't have lose fans with better air flow then the current setup has.
@@rocksfire4390 yes but you ate saying a hex pattern on the outside and a circle on the inside. You wnat to do both at the same time so obviously it will add more weight.
Most people: "Thats impossible!"
Peter: "Let's see"
i love that it sounds like you have opened that gates of hell when it running lol
"Isnt it weird how we live longer than men?"
"Yeah its weird"
But this mindset is what makes men do and achieve fantastic things and also fail miserably but women don't risk much
there's loads of ways you could improve the performance of this, like moving the ones blocked by your body and improving duct prop fit. would be even better with the drone motors from the santa slay build, just need a couple and you would be off
Even if I had a brilliant engineering mind like this I'd never have the patience to make and put together all of these small parts.
People like this leave me in awe .
Never thought I'd see Tucker on Peter Sripol's channel! I must say that I've never envied a harness more after seeing three really cute guys use it. LOL!
Great video - the mattress is interesting :) I fly with electric motors and I can advise. The engines directly behind your seat are not efficient because you are unknowingly creating a closed system (it's about the same as blowing your mouth into the sailboat you're sailing on) and some sort of "confusor" on every engine doesn't really help. The classic paramotor with one large propeller does not have this problem, because its blades extend beyond the profile of the seat and there is no thrust in the center of the propeller. You have only two options - move your propeller "mattress" far back, or reduce the number of engines to 2 with higher power, which will be spaced apart to a larger spacing of your back (the diameter of one propeller should be 28 "). Both propellers should rotate against each other - it eliminates the gyro effect.No "confusors" or two propellers on one axis of the engine, because it has no noticeable effect. :)
I wonder if he took half of them off and removed the ones behind his body and spaced them out more if it would fly better and last longer due to less weight and better efficiency and everything you mentioned.
@@JaredConnell Pokud by to udělal, získal by větší tah při stejné síle. To je vyzkoušené. Malé vrtule nejsou špatné, ale to by autor musel vyrobit něco podobného, co najdete na open ppg.
You don't want it too far back, it will try to twist the pilot, trying to get ahead of him. That could get very dangerous.
@@ChessMasterNate In practice, this is done by placing the propeller with an electric motor on a rod 0.75 m long behind the pilot's back. This propeller has folding blades like an umbrella, which expands by centrifugal force when the electric motor is switched on. In the motorless flight mode, the propeller folds down again like an umbrella thanks to the spring. In the case of a "mattress", it would be necessary to relieve it of the unnecessary things I mentioned somewhere and, of course, to move it away from the pilot's back (if he insisted on his concept). The partial rotation of the pilot to the right and left, as I noticed in the video, is due to the higher center of gravity, so something in this direction would have to change to prevent this. The pilot of a classic paramotor must be able to cope with the gyro effect of his propeller, so it is again up to the pilot and his experience.
I've been wondering why nobody (that I've seen) has done this yet.
Thank you for sharing Peter. Your channel is really inspirational. Keep it up!!
Please don't make a paramotor in 5 Minutes 😅
Never expected to see Tucker here. Started following him in mid 2020.
You should calculate the carbon footprint of all the politicians that tell you to lower your carbon footprint. LOL
I love the very clear enunciation of "sustainable" just to make sure the advertisers get their algorithmic bang for buck.
Peter, I can't wait to see version 2 of your electric paramotor. I've thought a lot about building an electric paramotor and I really think two counter rotating props is the way to go. That way you wouldn't need to worry about designing in torque steer correction into the frame. You should consider watching the "Insights Into Paramotor Geometry" series that Miro (creator of Scout Paramotors) released on the Scout Aviation UA-cam channel.
As a 3D modeler/animation artist I spend my time thinking on new designs all the time. Looking at a flying drone motor with 50 makes me wonder of another way to produce
the same force needed with just 8 motors. I found this video interesting. The idea sounds interesting.
From an Australian Peter to an American Peter, Congratulations on your creativity and ingenuity. Seems to me that you have the ability to achieve some great things in life.
2021 is great if you're paying attention to these types of wonderful builds!
You are doing what every kid dreamed about doing. Having only worked on UL,'s, with all the pre cut pieces and proven designs, I can appreciate the amount of work you're putting into these projects. Actually I don't how you're so productive but we're enjoying the ride right along. I think in Latin you'd be called a Vicarious Icarus :)
Evil genius, minus the evil. This is just awesome. Don't know where you get your creativity but it is impressive.
I don't really know anything so i have to ask: would it make a difference to put the motor units in a hexagonal pattern rather than square? I imagine you'd get more motors in a smaller surface area, and a hexagon would probably be more comfortable than a big rectangle
Yeah the bottom corners of the square could chop up your fingers pretty easily. I wonder if stacking 2 motors front to back would help also? Idk I'm not a expert on such things but I want this idea to take off lighter para motors would mean more people can fly.
It sounds like a B52 trying to taxi with flat tires
That looks like a big improvement in paramotoring, its a lot safer not having a giant slicer/dicer on your back. Plus you can shut off the power instantly. You just need more power somehow, maybe more batteries and stronger motors.
Thats a really good observation about the safety of multiple small rotors as opposed to one deadly one. i wonder why no company has made gas powered multi rotor ones? Like a gas generator i should say unless they found a way to make a load of driveshafts work on one engine haha
@@ter8901 Gas powered motors don't scale down very good.
Could be done with linear gas generators, they pack a huge punch for their small size and low weight
After I found out who you went training with I felt like I missed out by not learning with them this summer.
Went with a locally based instructor instead.
I too, live in Ohio 😆
Maybe I'll see you up there some time. Just watch out for me if you're about to launch some rockets.
Hahahaha that rocket part was funny
These guys literally risking their life in the name of science. great job guys.
Loved it!!!
I hope to see the improvements as they are made. Please keep Tucker up to date so he can keep us, his followers updated as well.
Now this is why U tube was created ..... This video was so much fun to watch and learn from
...............
Absolutely wonderful. I’m so impressed with you guys doing positive things.
This is not positive this could end up very bad, educate yourself
I like the part when he flew
I like the part where it goes Ēēēēēëè
@@rado595 reeeEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEĒĒĒĒĒĒĒĒĒĒĒĒĒĒĒĒĒĒĒĒĒĒĒĒĒĒĒĒĒĒĒĒĒĒĒ
JAJAJAJA!!! OMFGAWD 😜
I felt that
Man. I am so jealous of your Workshop. You are a Brave Man.
Congratulations to you and your team on this creative success. It looks like a George Jetson urban aerial vehicle is not far off. Maybe drone power will be the personal mode of travel.
Next step would be 2 use the 50 duct props 4 a real hover board.
now this was super cool!!! I was hype to see him land safe on the first real run!!! Keep improving the concept!!
My immediate thought after seeing the setup for the first time was that the batteries will drain quickly but also that the sail is massive and I wonder if there's any flexible enough lightweight solar cells or membranes you could fit onto it to essentially turn the wing into one massive solar panel to continually charge the batteries?
I feel a lot safer with this multiple mini drones setup than those huge paramotors that can slice you in half.
And if one of your propellers fails u have backup
King thomson didnt agree with that until
he went brrrr lol
EDF housings need EDF Fan blades. You're leaving a lot thrust on the table with those 3 blade props.
Ducting any propeller theoretically increases thrust/efficiency, but the duct needs to be designed right. It doesn't have to be a fan.
It’s people like this that make UA-cam worthwhile.
I learnt to paramotor 15 years ago in Thailand. I did not really enjoy it that much but with an electric motor it would be a whole different experience.
Nice proof of concept, I’m excited to see what mk.2 brings! I wonder if you could get a bigger prop turning slower to make less noise. I fantasize regularly about being able to fly hearing only the wind.
Go dune soaring !!!!
You mean like the propellers used on those powered paragliders?
Like on the one he has? He puts the proper propeller pack for it on near the start of the video there somewhere.
Yeah it's not a new idea, and it's kinda getting away from the multi drone-propeller idea there.... but that's probably a good thing, it's been well tried already and there's good reasons they're not used.
But yes those proper powered parachute/paragliders are pretty awesome contraptions and must give a close sensation of flying like a bird. :)
I've got a couple little microlights on one of my properties that I fly sometimes.... which are kinda in-between a powered paragliding and an ultralight or small plane.
More comfort and range and manoeuvrability and all that than a paraglider... probably a good deal safer too. But still have a very light, small, open-plan frame and gibe a strange sensation sort of like flying around on an outdoor lounge chair. 😏
You really feel the environment around you, all the wind and moisture and air pressure and dust and insects etc.
Wouldn't want to cross the Atlantic in one but hella fun. And quite useful on the land.
Safe too. Even if you pass out or something it'd pretty much just glide down and land itself eventually. Long as you don't hit any trees or anything.
Have a go if you get the chance.
Hi mate, fantastic project.
Check your locate strengths.. Some are designed to be removed with heat, some is permanent. Make sure it's a thread locker type for screws and drip it onto the screws from the tip down. You don't need much and not all loctite is for the same application. You'll get a much better result.
Cheers
Super Rad!!!
Also awesome to be surprised with the Tucker collab!
Silly extra credit idea for the next build:
Tune the PVM for each motor at the controller or through an intermediary controller that selects motors speeds from a hash table of specified frequencies. So that at different throttle positions the motors are making harmonious tones rather than wheezy whines. With so many motors it should be possible to have some mega lush tones that would blow peoples minds.
Extra Extra credit:
Make the motors play music.
This would be the same way people get their scanners to play music only scaled up to all of the motors. If appropriate songs are selected within the proper frequency range that overlaps with the frequency range of the motors maximum power output the contraption should be able to fly while playing music at the same time....
maybe...
at least it sounds great on paper :)
I love to see projects like this, some awesome engineering with a visit to the hospital afterwards. 😆
Wow ! Looks like it weighs considerably less than a gas powered fan motor. And no horrible racket from a 2 stroke engine. ❤
Well, this was incredible! Everyone else can stop making videos now. My apologies if this has been said tons before - but I wondered if you might get a any difference in thrust with the motors that are behind you configured to the sides of you versus behind you? Nice work, thank you, and good luck!
A dream with just enough physics and duct tape to stick together and fly!
You’ve found Einstein’s sweet spot: ‘Everything should be as simple as possible, it no simpler.’
Has ought to be the coolest thing I've ever seen built in my whole life
Hi Peter, did you see the Jetson flying car/drone thing?