Astrology Q/A Live

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 21

  • @RomasKalash
    @RomasKalash Місяць тому +6

    Your voice is sounding so smooth and lush today.

  • @groundedextracts
    @groundedextracts Місяць тому

    Thank you as always stellar work 💐🩵💐

  • @AarushiDua
    @AarushiDua Місяць тому +2

    Heyy vic, so good to see you, please talk about merc ketu conjunction In swati

  • @avantisiram1915
    @avantisiram1915 21 день тому +1

    It is funny you wear a green shirt instead of having a green screen. ❤

    • @VictoryRama
      @VictoryRama 20 днів тому +1

      WHAT I SAY IS JUST EXCELLENT!!! Read me yes??
      1 first of all, i know Western white people are always Mercurian (intellect - based on logic and facts, which is observable) & Eastern Asian people are always Jupiterian (intuition - based on consciousness, ethics, morals, emotional awareness, subconscious realms without use of drugs). No wonder Vic is Italian!
      2 He supports Tropical Placements along with Sidereal Nakshatras, because it's the true alignment, which isn't wrong. So technically Rohini will fall in Gemini and Hasta in Libra and Uttara Bhadrapada in Aries, etc....
      Yet Sidereal astrology incorporates the lunar mansions with the characteristics of zodiac bcoz this is what is it, it might not be the actual alignment in the sky... But spiritualy, from the "God, Soul' perspective, Rohini can never be Gemini characteristics or Ashlesha be Leo characteristics...
      Why? Becoz Sidereal astrology, connected always to Nakshatras (which is the real deal) is always Jupiterian eternal truth, irrespective of observable logical sense-perception faculty and reasoning....
      Yet Vic is convinced since the alignment in the sky is Purva Asadha in Capricorn, hence thats what is, but spiritualy, soul wise it can never be the truth! Purva Asadha is always Sagittarius!
      3 No wonder NASA scientists and European people always try to decode the universe based on logic and reason....
      Yet these-idiots (excluding Vic, becoz i respect and love him bcoz he is pious nevertheless, his Sun is in pushya) don't understand THE UNIVERSE IS UNTAMMABLE AND IS KETU AND PISCES AND IS NOT BASED ON LOGICAL FACULTY...
      STARSHIP WILL EVER REACH MAXIMUM UP TO SPACE STATION OR MOON OR MARS...
      DOES ANYONE THINK , ANY HUMAN MACHINE MADE WITH HELP OF "SCIENCE" BE ABLE TO BEAT LIGHT YEAR DISTANCE?? So where is science working with all the nebulas and galaxies and black holes and dwarf stars and billions of light years distance literally, it's unimaginable!
      4 What i commen is soooooo true and likeable. Sadly Vic is all intellect and decoding and based on logic (which is also super cool and helpful actually most times, trust me, without VIRGO, we wouldn't be anywhere, VIRGO AND CAPRICORN LOGIC ERADICATES 90% PROBLEMS AND 💩) but one also requires a certain amount of straight PISCES, atleast solid 10% to get the subconscious hints from the universe to understand TROPICAL PLACEMENTS WITH SIDEREAL NAKSHATRAS (tho it is the observable alignment) CAN NEVER BE THE SPIRITUAL EXPLANATION TO UNDERSTAND THE SOUL/Jeeva Karaka of a human, IT'S ALWAYS THE SIDEREAL ZODIAC SIGNS WHICH DIRECTLY CONNECTS TO THE LUNAR MANSIONS CHARACTERISTICS... I repeat, ASHWINI CAN NEVER BE TAURUS (although in the sky is visible like this).
      MY PISCES and 12th and 8th INTUITION EASILY CONVINCE ME ,
      ~"it's just your ability to memorize and utilise" ~ THAT'S WHAT VIC DOES

    • @avantisiram1915
      @avantisiram1915 20 днів тому +1

      @VictoryRama I agree the universe is untameable. I think aliens will help us.

  • @dharaAkasha
    @dharaAkasha Місяць тому +1

    Have you had any fun insights on your past lives?🌈💕😉

  • @seth4195
    @seth4195 Місяць тому

    I use tropical zodiac with sidereal nakshatras. But I'm so confused about which ayanamsa should I use for calculating dasha's ? And what dasha year length should I use ?
    Please throw some light 🙏

    • @ikartikthakur
      @ikartikthakur Місяць тому

      haha..I am on same path. saw ur three year old comment on krishna tropical zodiac.
      use drikpanchang app ..n select no ayanamsa ! I went from leo to virgo..n I kinda feel tropical might be true.
      I found no such website which gives vedic analysis for tropic zodiac n ..my boy charges lot which I can't afford now cuz no job! but surely..i'm his fan..n gonna buy his courses n reading later in life.

  • @zahrah997
    @zahrah997 Місяць тому

    Ugh , I missed it , I have lots of questions will save them for the next one

  • @wendyjayko8893
    @wendyjayko8893 6 днів тому

    Can you tell me why seemingly good Vedic astrologers say western tropical is erroneous because the signs go back 24 degrees?? Should I believe in your interpretation or theirs?😊

    • @VicDiCaraAstrology
      @VicDiCaraAstrology  6 днів тому

      study the facts and come to your own conclusion based on that. Please see vicdicara.com/tropical

    • @wendyjayko8893
      @wendyjayko8893 6 днів тому

      @ ok thank you for the response ! So then they don’t just go back 24 degrees?

  • @kaustubh_28
    @kaustubh_28 Місяць тому

    Couldnt be live for this one, was fast asleep. 🙏🏼

  • @treesa2732
    @treesa2732 Місяць тому +1

    Absolutely best description of moon in Taurus thank you great show!

  • @RomasKalash
    @RomasKalash Місяць тому

    How would you evaluate a planet that is debilitated but conjunct an exalted planet? In this case the exalted planet is also in a house exchange with the sign lord. That is to say the exalted planet is receiving even further support to be in the sign. Does this exalted lord then provide support to the debilitated planet similarly to the sign lord's presence and conjunction? Thank you

    • @RippleDrop.
      @RippleDrop. Місяць тому

      In my own chart, the debilitated planet still has massive problem source.

  • @anay7698
    @anay7698 Місяць тому

    Moon in taurus is stubborn imdeed. Every astologer has a tendency to blame the modern astrology yet they do astrology in modern area. Infact you are saying stubbornness but in a different manner. Using different words. Just Astrologers things.😂

    • @VicDiCaraAstrology
      @VicDiCaraAstrology  Місяць тому +2

      i think i was very clear. i am saying "stubborn" without the inherently negative implication of the actual word "stubborn" because an inherently negative implication is inappropriate to use for an exalted planet.