The Bible Reveals the TRUTH About Dinosaurs

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 9 вер 2024
  • There is SO much about dinosaurs that evolutionists do NOT want you to find out about…
    Calvin Smith, the Executive Director of Answers in Genesis-Canada, dives both into God’s Word as well as many articles and artifacts to show the truth behind dinosaurs: whether or not the Bible talks about them, how they went extinct, if they lived with humans, and much more.
    Subscribe to us for more high-quality biblical videos every week.
    Love our content? Help us to continue to proclaim the gospel and the authority of the Bible-from the very first verse-without compromise using apologetics by partnering with us here: answersingenes...
    _____________
    🔹 DIGGING DEEPER: Want deeper answers to your theological questions? Visit answersingenes...
    🔹 BLOG: See Calvin Smith’s weekly apologetics articles here: answersingenes...
    🔹 FREE e-BOOK: Sign up for our email newsletter and get a free copy of Calvin’s eBook, “Fellow Biblical Creationists! - STOP Doing These 3 Things…” answersingenes...
    🔹ANSWERS TV: Get equipped to defend the gospel of Jesus Christ and the truth of God’s Word with live and on-demand video content from Answers in Genesis, the Ark Encounter, Creation Museum, and other Ministries worldwide. Start your free trial today at www.answers.tv
    _____________
    SOCIAL MEDIA
    🔹 Facebook: / answerscanada
    🔹 Calvin Smith: / aigcalvinsmith
    🔹 Instagram: / answerscanada
    🔹 X (formerly Twitter): x.com/AnswersC...
    🔹 TikTok: / answersingenesisca
    _____________
    Unless otherwise indicated, all Scripture quotations are from The ESV® Bible (The Holy Bible, English Standard Version®), copyright © 2001 by Crossway, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 13 тис.

  • @whitelasagna6786
    @whitelasagna6786 5 місяців тому +5071

    When people ask why the Bible doesnt mention dinosaurs I point out that the Bible doesn't mention gorillas, but gorillas exist.

    • @Ariadne4
      @Ariadne4 5 місяців тому +122

      Yh but no one has seen a dinosaur

    • @Concerned-Nihilist
      @Concerned-Nihilist 5 місяців тому +326

      ​@@Ariadne4What was the behemoth then?

    • @godswatching2863
      @godswatching2863 5 місяців тому +269

      I never would question the fact that dinosaurs existed ten years ago. But now that I know we have been lied to about almost everything and history has been written by the victors. I wouldn't doubt if every dinosaur.Bone is actually just from another animal or artificially made

    • @ayenekponukpong7556
      @ayenekponukpong7556 5 місяців тому +410

      Read the Bible, specifically the Book of Job, talks about behemoth and Leviathan!
      Dinosaur is merely a modern name, the ancients had other names for them!

    • @brendareyes4295
      @brendareyes4295 5 місяців тому +127

      It does mention all of creation obviously no one was going to write the name of every creature created by God because the list will be never ending, but it says he created the birds and creatures of the land

  • @newcreationinchrist1423
    @newcreationinchrist1423 5 місяців тому +4837

    Amazing how much we've been lied to our entire life. The more I learn the more I realize that the Bible is more trustworthy than I thought.

    • @kevinburke1325
      @kevinburke1325 5 місяців тому +70

      @@jockyoung4491 by scientists.

    • @Bomtombadi1
      @Bomtombadi1 5 місяців тому +113

      Yeah nothing like your incredibly biased take on the world to confirm what you already believe.

    • @jockyoung4491
      @jockyoung4491 5 місяців тому

      @@kevinburke1325
      You don't know any scientists. And yet you are positive that ALL of the scientists in the world are dishonest or stupid. Why?

    • @1VFA666
      @1VFA666 5 місяців тому

      @@gregoryt8792 *ZERO%* of Nobel Prizes have been awarded for research supporting literal Genesis Creationism.

    • @litigioussociety4249
      @litigioussociety4249 5 місяців тому +30

      ​@@Bomtombadi1There's propaganda on all sides. It's only confirmation bias, if the foundation for the person's assessment is nothing but a fallacious argument from authority. If instead the person has proven their credibility, and is presenting an alternative argument that aligns with the listener's views or conclusions, then it's completely valid.
      There are plenty of Christian apologists and secular apologists that have been rejected for their now debunked claims. As a result, rejecting one demographic based on that is bias and bigotry.

  • @marks658
    @marks658 5 місяців тому +1329

    "I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned." - Richard Feynman
    And that goes both ways

    • @V7I7T7A
      @V7I7T7A 5 місяців тому +4

      Flip Flop Mcgonigle

    • @KingSynQ
      @KingSynQ 5 місяців тому +12

      But the bible says only one leviathan existed, i dont think only one super croc existed

    • @johnjackson229
      @johnjackson229 5 місяців тому +49

      Love that quote and Feynman. A true scientist unlike some of the celebrities today. Great thing about God is that while He states in the bible that there are mysteries we don't know or don't know yet, salvation is clear enough for a child to understand 🙂

    • @j.pershing2197
      @j.pershing2197 5 місяців тому

      ​@@KingSynQ
      Watch Symbols of an Alien Sky. Its in Thunderbolts Project playlist.

    • @johnjackson229
      @johnjackson229 5 місяців тому +53

      Not sure why you feel the need to tell me that you are atheist and have no hope of salvation. As for me, I'm not dreaming of salvation, I live it. I was a sinner, and now I live a new and holy life because of the person of Jesus. Eternal salvation from death in heaven will be great but i am already saved and experiencing a true relationship with God. It's awesome. He's awesome.

  • @samjiva
    @samjiva Місяць тому +215

    The word "dinosaur" was coined by English paleontologist Richard Owen in 1842. So before this less than 200 years old word was invented, people called them dragons.

    • @spitflamez
      @spitflamez 17 днів тому +10

      תַּנִּין
      Transliteration: tannîn
      Pronunciation: tan-neen'
      Part of Speech: masculine noun
      Root Word (Etymology): Intensive from the same as תַּן (H8565)
      TWOT Reference: 2528b
      Outline of Biblical Usage:
      dragon, serpent, sea monster
      dragon or dinosaur
      sea or river monster
      serpent, venomous snake

    • @petertheore668
      @petertheore668 16 днів тому +5

      The word internet did not exist 100 years ago. What is the point

    • @petertheore668
      @petertheore668 16 днів тому

      Dinosaurs are not “dragons”. How can so much silliness be injected into such a short video

    • @sandgrownun66
      @sandgrownun66 15 днів тому +1

      @@petertheore668 As much as they can fit in one video.

    • @Adventist1997
      @Adventist1997 14 днів тому +2

      ​@@petertheore668
      What were they called before the word dinosaur was used?

  • @Milokitty-en5nb
    @Milokitty-en5nb 4 місяці тому +943

    God didn’t feel it necessary to explain EVERYTHING to us. We aren’t capable of understanding everything. He told us what we need to do to enter his kingdom, period. Everything else is a distraction.

    • @jaracab6
      @jaracab6 3 місяці тому

      That is so much bullshit!

    • @gothboschincarnate3931
      @gothboschincarnate3931 3 місяці тому +18

      So your an airhead then?

    • @rachaelgeorge177
      @rachaelgeorge177 3 місяці тому +52

      To the person calling those who have Faith an airhead, you have been presented evidence in the video above. Moreover, to those who question GOD as Job did, they too will have to answer his questions one day. I humble heartedly ask that you read Job 38-40 so that we can further discuss why you felt this way was the one to walk on.

    • @LowDragProductions45
      @LowDragProductions45 2 місяці тому +6

      Ohhh is it now? Alligators are vegetarians? Grow up.

    • @kyuss5729
      @kyuss5729 2 місяці тому +8

      @@rachaelgeorge177 "evidence" 🤦‍♂️🤡😂

  • @liahfox5840
    @liahfox5840 2 місяці тому +867

    Dinosaur is a new term. Before 1841 the entire world recognized them as simply as "dragons!"

    • @vintagegraffixx
      @vintagegraffixx 2 місяці тому +63

      And there are verses in the bible that also calls them dragons

    • @XxDeathxX509
      @XxDeathxX509 Місяць тому +16

      The only dragon back in the days of creation was Lucifer according to the bible, whose form only took place when the rebellion started. So that logic is negligible to the topic

    • @bengraham5699
      @bengraham5699 Місяць тому +26

      exactly. There are still old books to be found that are using the name "dragons" for what we call "dinosaur" now.

    • @EmeraldsFire
      @EmeraldsFire Місяць тому +2

      Compare animation of wyvern dragon with pterosaur. Especially walking and in flight

    • @BaptistJoshua
      @BaptistJoshua Місяць тому +22

      @@XxDeathxX509 You should know the topic before correcting her. She is correct about "dragon" being the term. Also, the Bible mentions many different dragons.

  • @johnhall1018
    @johnhall1018 Місяць тому +233

    Don't limit the greatness of creation to your own limited understanding.

    • @razbearymoon1276
      @razbearymoon1276 28 днів тому +5

      Well said 👏😉

    • @wingler-dm4hk
      @wingler-dm4hk 18 днів тому

      Thats so true. its a shame that These idiots are allowed to Upload such bs

    • @alivetilldeath8
      @alivetilldeath8 18 днів тому

      Word^

    • @ulrikjensen6841
      @ulrikjensen6841 16 днів тому +1

      This man is fast talking, right?
      He also is smart, right?
      Dinosaurs were not comtemporary with, say, elephants - and the first elephants were small and cute; with time they developed into mammoths - that's what you call
      E V O L U T I O N - hooraaaaay!!!

    • @user-ih7ii6lj8c
      @user-ih7ii6lj8c 15 днів тому +5

      ​@@ulrikjensen6841then why have they not keep developing into some other things since then? What a silly and dumb theory?

  • @ikkenhisatsu7170
    @ikkenhisatsu7170 24 дні тому +117

    I said years ago, when science figures out the truth, it will agree with The Bible. Excellent video!

    • @Katagatamekiller
      @Katagatamekiller 15 днів тому

      Which truth? Has science not already ‘figured out’ many truths. (Science does not figure out anything, it observes phenomena)

    • @krisshaw9464
      @krisshaw9464 7 днів тому

      Science is the coming together of the physical form of creation at the command and shout of the word of God which is spoken all things into existence the very coming together out of nothing because God creates out of nothing for his spirit and when he creates physical science is that very coming together of those things those many things which come together in the righteousness of existence to create in the righteousness of things which are explainable unto the very DNA that is man's understanding and they call it science

  • @guardianrottweilers
    @guardianrottweilers 3 місяці тому +683

    I cannot take credit for this, but it has stuck with me for years. An older show called Touched By An Angel used to come on TV. More or less, it was about how angels might work amongst us to help with crisis of faith and other issues. Beautiful show if you've never seen it. There was one episode where a young lady just couldn't fathom 'God' and thought science explained everything. A question was posed to her whilst she was taking a walk in the woods. "If you were to find a watch sitting on this stump right here, how do you suppose it got there?" She of course responded that someone probably left it there. She was then asked if she thought it were possible that, since the material needed to make the watch- the leather, metal, battery, etc. was found easily enough on earth, is it possible that all of the pieces required to make that watch just happened to fall together on that stump, in the precise quantity/condition necessary to make that watch a working watch. The young woman thought that was a silly notion. I agree. So, if we do not think that even something as simple as a wristwatch could just automagically "fall together" regardless of how many big bangs or years to evolve it was given, how then do we 'buy' that man, infinitely more complex, somehow just automagically came together? Just as that watch was designed and created with purpose by a creator who poured his love into his creation, we too were created on purpose and with a purpose. You are a loved and treasured child of God. Do not let silly notions of man, lacking logical explanation, take that away from you.

    • @Something-Waffle
      @Something-Waffle 2 місяці тому +17

      That show isn't as innocent as you think it is. It teaches gnostic ideas about God, and it's not based around the Bible. The "angels" aren't Biblically accurate either. There is no such thing as a female angel. If anyone ever sees a "female" angel, it was probably an angel disguising as a human. (Hebrews 13:2) There are some angels; the Seraphim for example, that are described as fearsome creatures with multiple eyes, and wings that circle the throne room of God.

    • @thunderheadedanno3434
      @thunderheadedanno3434 2 місяці тому +60

      ​@@Something-Wafflethe point was not about the quality of the show but the quote

    • @eddieelmore6512
      @eddieelmore6512 2 місяці тому +2

      Amen❤

    • @John-Rambo81
      @John-Rambo81 2 місяці тому +4

      Where does the bible say that animals didnt eat each other? Who said there was no death for animals?
      Death entered mankind from Sin but death was already here.

    • @bakacomo
      @bakacomo 2 місяці тому +1

      Annunaki

  • @AMindInOverdrive
    @AMindInOverdrive 4 місяці тому +519

    The point about fire coming from a dinosaur is good. If we'd never seen them, who'd have though fireflies could produce light, or octopuses ink, or eels electricity, or dolphins sonar, bats echolocation, jellyfish with those amazing multicoloured lights, or camoflage on cuttlefish, etc? Creatures have amazing design built-in, so why not a snort of fire?

    • @MatteoPicone-yy7pk
      @MatteoPicone-yy7pk 3 місяці тому +12

      Because they weren't specialized to do that, they were completely different animals, it's true that since there were animals similar to the ones we have now, they could've had in common those characteristics, but the problem is that no existing reptile breathe fire, they didn't have the right organs to do it, the animals who "breath fire" don't even do that, but use specific chemical reactions. Animals are amazing most of the time, including us, but if you want to learn about them better, you can't just make wild speculations, it's the reason for why modern science is so important.

    • @scottkimball9169
      @scottkimball9169 3 місяці тому

      Your speculation is wild , you said it yourself , chemical reactions ? You know a lot of different types of chemical reactions in many make fire . And they say 99% of animals to ever exist never left a fossil ?
      I know , that one’s tough to swallow but that’s what science claims .
      But of all the amazing things different animals can do , these ones watching , commenting and making these videos can clone animals, do complex math , use internet,gps, laser weapons, leave our planet, make any chemical reaction we choose and invent them .
      Biologically making fire through a internal chemical reaction seems kinda basic compared to us doesn’t it ?

    • @EricOnline92
      @EricOnline92 3 місяці тому +38

      That and also maybe it isn't literal fire they are referring to exactly. Could have been something that perhaps just burned LIKE fire if it landed on you. People do have a really bad habit of using metaphors for things. It isn't like they were trying to detail the creature or anything. Just generalizing the creature. Just food for thought.

    • @EricOnline92
      @EricOnline92 3 місяці тому +10

      OR (after thought) Since it was an aquatic creature they were referring to it could very well have been a defensive action such as Squids releasing Ink but it may have been colored or looked generally like fire when released in the water. Who knows really.

    • @Split_tails
      @Split_tails 3 місяці тому

      ​@@MatteoPicone-yy7pkA lot of things happen with chemical reactions. Photosynthesis is a chemical reaction. Some lizard in the desert uses a chemical reaction to burp out "fire" that could be something similar the big animal did and people called it breathing fire

  • @RM-lu1kx
    @RM-lu1kx 5 місяців тому +725

    In the last days, knowledge will increase.

    • @diane70416
      @diane70416 5 місяців тому +36

      Yes! It is so overwhelming to go through social media nowadays...

    • @LorenzoReumer075
      @LorenzoReumer075 5 місяців тому +25

      AMEN✝️

    • @RM-lu1kx
      @RM-lu1kx 5 місяців тому +8

      @BarryWhite-dt5xt The opposite

    • @DionSmith1980
      @DionSmith1980 5 місяців тому +16

      Yes, too bad wisdom is definitely decreased during the years. Not trying to insult! Love you guys God bless you in Jesus name💜🫡✝️

    • @DCNali
      @DCNali 5 місяців тому +33

      ​@BarryWhite-dt5xtthe opposite. The more we find in our society archeologically and scientifically, the more the bible is proven correct. There is a reason creation is called the science of creation and evolution is still called a theory meaning its never been proven after all this time. The fact creation can be proven but evolution cant is just 1 more reason the bible is correct.

  • @Xarxes_
    @Xarxes_ Місяць тому +158

    Fun fact: when Moses is describing the unclean animals he specifically mentions, "any kind of great lizard".

    • @docholliday7226
      @docholliday7226 29 днів тому +3

      I've totally missed this! Where is this at plz?

    • @Xarxes_
      @Xarxes_ 29 днів тому +22

      @@docholliday7226 Leviticus 11:29

    • @AngelWings5286
      @AngelWings5286 27 днів тому

      That's wrong to there's lies in the Bible as well it's not a manual to live my goodness u people are stupid 😅it's not set in stone how to live that's not evolution it's simply explained how's things were learned back then from multiple perceptions 😅learn discernment not judgment we are missing so much knowledge ur ment to learn and growth from it go ur own path in love of others not hate what u don't understand try to learn more expand ur knowledge find new ways new knowledge 🎉

    • @valconir1619
      @valconir1619 23 дні тому +8

      Wow if i have lived in that time period dinosaur meat is definitely in my bucket list of meat i would love to try and than Moses said it’s unclean..😢

    • @Xarxes_
      @Xarxes_ 23 дні тому +4

      @@valconir1619 tbf it was probably unclean because they didn't cook meat at that time

  • @indivisible885
    @indivisible885 8 днів тому +9

    In my observations, not all dinosaurs went extinct. We still see alligators and crocodiles, turtles and tortoises, and so on... MOST dinosaurs aren't around anymore. That doesn't mean ALL.

  • @tiffanycoulthurst4821
    @tiffanycoulthurst4821 5 місяців тому +338

    It isn't just the shows that kids watch. I am 42 years old and it was 100% taught in school. Dinosaurs lived millions of years ago, we evolved from apes. Science, science science.
    I never even questioned it. I grew up "believing" in God but never knowing Him. Criticism of the Bible even tho i had never read it. My excuses being that God himself didn't write it, man did so of course there were going to be things that were misinterpreted.
    When I finally read the Bible 10 yrs ago and gave my life to Christ it was amazing how everything seemed to make sense. Things I had questioned before, were easily explained. All I needed was the knowledge of His Word. And I equipped my children with the Word as well.
    I am still learning and still find it fascinating because I have a new view, as seen through a child's eyes. I am thankful for finally having a relationship with God through Jesus Christ

    • @davidbordwell8346
      @davidbordwell8346 5 місяців тому +10

      Not trying to be rude here, so you dont believe dinosaurs roamed the planet millions of years ago? If not, when did they? Just curious 🤔

    • @DividerLP
      @DividerLP 5 місяців тому +17

      From, no. We didn’t evolve from apes. Apes are a type of primate. We are also a type of primate. We share a common ancestor, but not an ape. It’s much more technical.

    • @mchooksis
      @mchooksis 5 місяців тому +18

      Let me get this straight. You grew up believing in god, and yet you had never read the bible??? and yet the bible is the closest thing to evidence (flawed evidence) that apologists have to explain god? You just believe anything you are told? And yet when science tells you things, (with robust evidence) you don't believe it. I just can't get my head around that level of cognitive dissonance.

    • @lovelysadie880
      @lovelysadie880 5 місяців тому

      ​@@mchooksiswell yes a child is going to believe what they are taught in school. Is what this person was saying. And as we grow older, the same false indoctrination gets added too, without question. Like the people who still believe in the gov and nasa. 😂😂

    • @jeffmosier3145
      @jeffmosier3145 5 місяців тому +1

      Not if you believe the bible bub. God made everything in 6 days and tested in the 7th. God clearly says in the bible that 1 if his days is a 1000 of ours. We are in them 1000 yrs. What's more important and it curious is that Adam&Eve were created in the 6th day and God rested on the 7th day which again a thousand years , a 1000 yrs of days of tribulation for us to endure. It comes off as if God new Adam&Eve would take of the tre that he forbidden them to take from. But then again God says he is the Alpha and the Omega (the beginning and the end) and also says and here we go that he is all knowing , loving and forgiving. Well in my book Tribulation (now times) is not fun and I didn't ask for it. Love? Now to switch tracks real quick...NASA took vore moon samples and each time they went to the moon and the moon continues to collect dust and grow and NASA easily determined that it took 6000 ish yrs to develop. There's some science for you. e​@@davidbordwell8346

  • @Feuoh
    @Feuoh 3 місяці тому +162

    The Bible clearly talks of the Behemoth and Leviathan and gives descriptions which sound just like a dinosaur and dragon that breathes fire. Amazing. I wish I didnt have to wait until i was about 30 to find out about this when i read it in the Bible after searching for answers. I wish i was taught this in elementary school. Thank God for Sunday schools where our children can learn things of God and the Bible together.

    • @DaphneValentinexoxo03
      @DaphneValentinexoxo03 2 місяці тому

      Or it could have been analogy of the final battle between God and Satan. The Bible said that there are two leviathans but one is already dead he killed one so where's the skeleton? I have two theories on the dead one either we have yet to find the skeleton or...we just did a few weeks ago in a mine in India they found the skeleton of a huge prehistoric snake they called Vasuki Indicus the snake is said to be bigger than the Titanaboa which was about 42 ft they put this new snake at around 50-60 ft the largest on record. Everyone thinks this biblical leviathan is going to be like 1,000 feet long maybe that's a stretch a 60ft snake would be real hard to kill and get on a hook in my opinion. The biblical leviathan could also be a species of large prehistoric crocodile as well. However, he does call leviathan that twisting serpent to me that sounds very snake like just saying. While I love a good fantasy I'm also practical there is no real proof of dragons outside of myths, so to me the best suited animal that is water based that we do have in our records that would come remotely close to the description of leviathan would be a giant snake and this new find is a huge snake. Any snake that size weighing over a ton would be so hard to kill.

    • @albertafarmer8638
      @albertafarmer8638 2 місяці тому +6

      @@DaphneValentinexoxo03 No, this is not a parable, leviathans are real creatures!

    • @ronegling6932
      @ronegling6932 Місяць тому +4

      Definitely Leviathan

    • @jedward635
      @jedward635 Місяць тому +1

      Yes. Thank you. The only mention of any creature that could be dinosauresque.

    • @latininches4269
      @latininches4269 Місяць тому

      Fantastic input. Hey, the Bible says some stuff that if you interpret this way it clearly talks about Dinosaurs. You just have kinda sort off see what it means to you and then see what your pastor says and it all ties together. Boom! God is real. Oh ok, should we then also interpret the 10 commandments. Maybe the look on a woman with lust has to be interpret. But no right, the easy ones are the ones that god was very clear and straight forward about. The hard ones, those are the ones you have to spin. Why don’t you read the story about David. Not the David and Goliath part, but when David became king. Go see what god did to a helpless innocent new born just so he could flex. Please love to hear your thoughts on this and how you’re going to spin it. 2nd Samuel I believe is where the story is.

  • @kberlinquette
    @kberlinquette Місяць тому +214

    I feel like a lot of people look at God through a pin hole instead of taking a step back to see the whole picture.

    • @alantasman8273
      @alantasman8273 Місяць тому +18

      The problems is that even if we take a step back we cannot in our finite selves see the whole picture...His ways are higher than ourselves and man's abilities are finite.

    • @kberlinquette
      @kberlinquette Місяць тому +7

      @@alantasman8273 ...and that's why you open yourself up to the possibilities and why religion is called faith 🙂

    • @alantasman8273
      @alantasman8273 Місяць тому +6

      @@kberlinquette Faith is a trust in Jesus the Christ...the only name by which men may be saved.

    • @wasntme3651
      @wasntme3651 Місяць тому

      @@alantasman8273
      Who did Jesus pray to?

    • @wasntme3651
      @wasntme3651 29 днів тому +1

      @@resjgamer2378
      He was praying to Jehovah. I know it’s complicated because man has removed the name Jehovah and replaced it with the titles Lord and God. If you do your research it was through the original texts roughly 7,000 times. The trinity is also a man made doctrine. I know you will say I’m wrong and that’s ok. Psalms 83:18 in the King James Version still has his name unless it’s a newer print. Jesus said many things to make it clear he isn’t god but the son. Or when it was said about the time of the end and says nobody knows, not the Angels in heaven nor the son but only the father knows the time. Look into the word Stauros and it’s meaning also.

  • @jennyd9144
    @jennyd9144 5 місяців тому +1620

    There’s a reason Disney owns national geographic

    • @AngelaLewis-kv2mi
      @AngelaLewis-kv2mi 5 місяців тому +109

      I did'nt know this about disney ...Thank you 🫂

    • @nickvroege
      @nickvroege 5 місяців тому +37

      what a combination lol

    • @martinkent333
      @martinkent333 5 місяців тому

      @@AngelaLewis-kv2mi Dooooooooooooooooooooom and glooooooooom......................................................................

    • @martinkent333
      @martinkent333 5 місяців тому +2

      @@nickvroege Dooooooooooooooooom............................ Cupcake. What up?

    • @BridgetteBentley
      @BridgetteBentley 5 місяців тому +47

      Agreed. I’ve worked for them and that is the truth

  • @shandor2522
    @shandor2522 5 місяців тому +661

    I remember reading about the preserved soft tissue in the T-Rex bones. It’s the most-ignored discovery of modern times.

    • @maylingng4107
      @maylingng4107 5 місяців тому +1

      The "preserved tissue" ha been tested repeatedly to be 65+ million years old. It was actually collagen.

    • @captivedesk3168
      @captivedesk3168 5 місяців тому +71

      "One thing that does bother me, though, is that young earth creationists take my research and use it for their own message, and I think they are misleading people about it. Pastors and evangelists, who are in a position of leadership, are doubly responsible for checking facts and getting things right, but they have misquoted me and misrepresented the data."
      Mary Schweitzer

    • @jockyoung4491
      @jockyoung4491 5 місяців тому +42

      The discovery was published in prestigious scientific journals and is well known to all biologists. It is also twisted and misrepresented by armies of clueless creationists. How is that being "ignored"?

    • @CameronThomasMedia
      @CameronThomasMedia 5 місяців тому +45

      @@jockyoung4491 Aren't there alot of clueless evolutionists?

    • @maylingng4107
      @maylingng4107 5 місяців тому +30

      @@CameronThomasMedia
      None that I know of. Who do you know?
      There is no such thing as an evolutionists. We are called biologists.

  • @creatagheorghe9905
    @creatagheorghe9905 5 місяців тому +709

    Jesus the living GOD wants a personal relationship with you!. We are spiritual people it is a fact!. Work with Holy Spirit In JESUS name!!!

    • @HangrySaturn
      @HangrySaturn 5 місяців тому +3

      Perhaps, but he goes a poor way about it.

    • @creatagheorghe9905
      @creatagheorghe9905 5 місяців тому

      @@HangrySaturnHe have The Perfect way for you believe in His way!

    • @razark9
      @razark9 5 місяців тому +10

      If he does he could show himself or at the very least give me some sign or indication. I'll take anything that's not just 'read the bible and believe it without question' or 'look at this tree and just tell yourself it's made by god!'

    • @letscatchthemall6862
      @letscatchthemall6862 5 місяців тому +23

      @@HangrySaturndying for your sin and taking your place for the punishment you deserve ?
      That’s not going the right way ?
      Don’t lose out, search him, you don’t get to tell God how he does it! He made this universe and he laid down the rules to know him
      Your choice to accept or deny him

    • @PafMedic
      @PafMedic 5 місяців тому +8

      @@razark9…Sooo.Why Are You Here..Are You So Unhappy With Yourself,You Have To Go Where You Know Others Are Happy And Be A Troll.🤷🏼‍♀️

  • @riggstwenty2
    @riggstwenty2 Місяць тому +29

    This makes sense to me. So glad I didn’t go to bed an hour ago !

    • @nathanspark4876
      @nathanspark4876 13 днів тому

      God literally RULED SLAVERY, ordered incest and ordered to kill thousands of innocent ppl SPECIFYING TO NOT SPARE EVEN CHILDREN, but hey, let's pretend this is not in the bible and let's look JUST of what seems to fit our ''argument'', seems logic and honest. Do this also makes sense to you, a killer sadistic GOd?

  • @debnadaebna9981
    @debnadaebna9981 3 місяці тому +48

    I am Bulgarian and in our old folklore and myths we have several similar words for some kind of dragons I guess, which are "Змей" (Zmei, Zmey), "Змеица" (Zmeitsa),"Ламя" (Lamya), "Хала" (Hala). Also some kind of griffins too.
    The Lamia (dragon) is a female creature with iconography appearance of an enormous reptile with sharp-nailed legs, dog’s head and sharp teeth. Its mouth is so large that it can swallow a human or cattle. Its body is covered with yellow scales. Lamia is often pictured with three or nine identical heads. It is often a motive in the folklore songs and fairy tales. It lives at the sea bottom or in desert woods and stops the water in the wells, rivers and lakes. In this way it forces people to sacrifice someone for it to eat. Despite its frightful appearance, brave men fight it and win by cutting off its head.
    The Zmeys (male dragons) are enemies of the Lamia, and they are young male creatures with human appearance, a tale and wings in the armpits. The lower part of their bodies is covered with scales shining like gold. They inhabit faraway woods and caves. Places in Bulgaria are often named Zmeyova dupka (Zmey’s hole), Zmeyov kladenetz (Zmey’s well). Zmeys consume mainly milk, eat a lot of white bread and drink heavy wine. Zmeys are friendly towards people.
    Hala is a very similar creature to Lamia and Zmei. She looks like a bull with horns or a very old and ugly toothless woman. She lives on rocks and hills and could also look like a grass-snake. It is believed that in every sea or lake there is a Hala. A Hala can bring dark clouds, heavy rains, storms or fog. Covering entire fields with fog, she can smother the crops. Sometimes she appears as a strong wind (Vihrushka). Like Lamia, Hala has the same enemy - the Zmei, who guards villages and crops.
    Bulgarians have also many other mythic creatures. They scare people and are seen as reason for many misfortunes.

    • @hellybelle5
      @hellybelle5 2 місяці тому +5

      I love to hear/read what other cultures/countries believe ❤ A friend lived in Taiwan and said (I think it was the number 8) one of their symbols is in reference to Noah's ark! ❤We have so much in common around the world ❤

    • @elizabethanthony3916
      @elizabethanthony3916 2 місяці тому +4

      I love to hear folk tales from around the world, thank you 😁👍

    • @gumshoegypsy
      @gumshoegypsy 2 місяці тому

      Thanks for sharing☺️

    • @minnesota0
      @minnesota0 Місяць тому +1

      This fact is related to the topic.
      In Russian, 'змея' means snake.
      If you've watched the video all the way through you will understand

    • @thanatosgarvey3701
      @thanatosgarvey3701 Місяць тому

      We American nerds hate fighting Lamia in Final Fantasy. That game series is probably the main reason why I learned about the rest of the world and gained an interest in anthropology.

  • @user-tj5sr2ss8g
    @user-tj5sr2ss8g 4 місяці тому +461

    Analogy of dinosaurs burping themselves to get death is like Gates analogy of cows farting and polluting the air with gases that will kill us

    • @carynmartin6053
      @carynmartin6053 4 місяці тому +13

      Probably how he came up with!🎉😂

    • @SupHapCak
      @SupHapCak 4 місяці тому

      Not really
      Cows can die from being built up with methane gases, and they have to be pierced to let the gases out.
      Why couldn’t the dinosaurs suffer the same, died from not burping

    • @Ciskokid1970
      @Ciskokid1970 3 місяці тому +8

      I was laughing at that one as well 😁👍

    • @haroldbell213
      @haroldbell213 3 місяці тому +2

      Heard a man who said that. I just shake my head

    • @chazcow9868
      @chazcow9868 3 місяці тому +3

      I saw that on a South Park episode 😂

  • @Psalm-yg6yi
    @Psalm-yg6yi 5 місяців тому +338

    Bombardier Bettles can shoot out 100° C spray at 22 mph that's mixed within its own body, so It's not really hard to believe that a Dragon or Leviathan could breath out fire or burning spray or chemicals.

    • @burtknighten4438
      @burtknighten4438 5 місяців тому +36

      And it conpletely kills evolution. How could such a complicated system come about through small mutations over thousands of years.

    • @faytleingod1851
      @faytleingod1851 5 місяців тому +19

      The whole idea of evolution taking place slowly doesn't make sense in many ways. Just look at eyeballs, several small changes had to happen at the same time, and yet, just about everything has eyes. But they may not have all branched from the same eye template, they evolved separately for different species. I dunno sci sho does a better job describing it than me 😂

    • @phylliswestbury5081
      @phylliswestbury5081 5 місяців тому +6

      They get to the boiling point of water. The boiling point of water is 212 °F Here in US most of us don’t comprehend C or metric system
      I’ve actually been sprayed by one at Galveston Beach. I had never been to the ocean before and knew nothing about these creatures. Imagine my surprise lol

    • @Quantum36911
      @Quantum36911 5 місяців тому +2

      Such a great comment! I agree! Now that is extrapolative science at its finest!

    • @marniekilbourne608
      @marniekilbourne608 5 місяців тому +1

      How is that remotely relevant?!

  • @Nomasis1982
    @Nomasis1982 25 днів тому +7

    The gargantuan and the leviathan are both referenced in the Bible. Also find it weird people discuss dinosaurs but completely seem to forget about the giant humanoid bones from various dig sites. Giants existed as well. All of which were covered in the Bible and book of Enoch. Don’t have to be a believer to see. And doesn’t matter if you’re a believer or not, father exists regardless.

  • @LionofJudah888
    @LionofJudah888 5 місяців тому +492

    I asked God how did all the snimsls get on the ark, and the answer I got was, "the same way I kept the lion's from eating Daniel." Makes sense to me.

    • @eeeaten
      @eeeaten 5 місяців тому +19

      magic huh

    • @enigmoxical
      @enigmoxical 5 місяців тому +11

      Baby dinosaurs. They’re soooo cute 🙂

    • @thecapitalg
      @thecapitalg 5 місяців тому +17

      I mean doesn't it say Biblically that God (or angel of God I don't remember) basically shut the lion's mouths?

    • @eeeaten
      @eeeaten 5 місяців тому +6

      @@thecapitalg why not, magic can be the answer to anything.

    • @user-vc2dg1xb3u
      @user-vc2dg1xb3u 5 місяців тому +40

      Not magic but still by the miraculous means of gods hand, the angels shut the lions mouth’s why can’t the angels of god lead them into the ark as well?

  • @beachs911
    @beachs911 3 місяці тому +68

    To add explanation to the breathing fire question I wanted to say that biologist have discovered a small beetle/ that has a self defense mechanism where it ejects 2 chemicals from its rump which ignite when mixed and burn at extremely high temperatures.

  • @godman5043
    @godman5043 5 місяців тому +548

    A Bombardier Beetle has two chemicals that are stored separately in its body. When they mix in the spraying tube, a 600F spray comes out it's back end to repel predators. Now that is hot!

    • @nwofoe2866
      @nwofoe2866 5 місяців тому +51

      sorry but it momentarily reminded me of Joe Biden.

    • @01IveR01
      @01IveR01 5 місяців тому

      @nwofoe2866🤣

    • @dustd9806
      @dustd9806 5 місяців тому +15

      600!!! That’s nuts!

    • @georg7120
      @georg7120 5 місяців тому +3

      What does the beetle need this for?

    • @shandor2522
      @shandor2522 5 місяців тому +47

      @@georg7120 To protect itself against tyrants, it needs its firearm!

  • @gingercatz5568
    @gingercatz5568 15 днів тому +5

    Finally someone that read the Word! Until the flood, man could call the Leviathan and knew the Behemoth. Thank you for talking about this! In Job, he talked about them! They have found the strangest creatures in the ocean and even flying creatures! The rest drowned, one of God's greatest regret and I believe part of why He promised to never flood the earth again. 😳🌈

  • @ashdell430
    @ashdell430 4 місяці тому +242

    Important point is that the word dinosaur is a Victorian era name when people began to uncover fossils. Such a word was not in existence prior to this. So when you read names like leviathan, this was more likely to be what we call a dinosaur today

    • @eeeaten
      @eeeaten 4 місяці тому +2

      They didn’t know about dinosaurs before that

    • @Viruz32
      @Viruz32 4 місяці тому

      ​@@eeeatenThey didn't know about the word "dinosaur" because it wasn't invented until the 1800s. Yet you can clearly see carvings and pottery thousands of years old showing dinosaurs. Not to mention the unexplainable dragon "myth" across different cultures, different time periods, separated by different land Masses. But sure, those were just "stories". Because we are so much smarter nowadays. There's no way that the scientific institutions are bought and paid for to control the way members of society think. Oh wait? That's what the government specializes in, propaganda. And the most successful government tyrannical takeovers consisted of the government convincing it's citizens that God doesn't exist. Communism for instance is inherently atheistic. It needs to be, so that the government becomes God of the people. It's modern day idolatry. Things don't change, they just get called different names.
      Btw the current scientific "consensus" states that men can get pregnant and gender is a social construct. And any opposition to that narrative gets censored and people get fired. Yeah I'm sure that totally has more to do with seeking truth, rather than propaganda.

    • @DrizzleDrizzle24HourPowerCycle
      @DrizzleDrizzle24HourPowerCycle 4 місяці тому +6

      Accurate

    • @JohnWickjr
      @JohnWickjr 4 місяці тому

      @@eeeaten Yes, they did, only they were called dragons. Every ancient culture mentions them. Sir Richard Owen coined the term 'dinosauria' in 1842. Evolution is a h0ax.

    • @lonayork591
      @lonayork591 3 місяці тому +12

      As well as 'behemoth'. 😃

  • @user-jd3cg5ni2m
    @user-jd3cg5ni2m 5 місяців тому +698

    There is pottery found in South America that depicts humans riding and living with dinosaurs. There are hundreds to thousands of pieces of pottery showing this very thing.

    • @burnttoast2790
      @burnttoast2790 5 місяців тому +2

      And all of those are known frauds, having been created by locals paid to do so, based on inaccurate renderings of dinosaurs based on children's toys from the 1900s, and were artificially aged by being covered in chicken excrement.

    • @JiraiyaSama86
      @JiraiyaSama86 5 місяців тому +82

      And yet, they continue to act like they don't exist. They'll try to come up with some story like it's a hoax, coincidence, or whatever.

    • @avejupiter8486
      @avejupiter8486 5 місяців тому +1

      you mean the Ica stones "After being arrested and interrogated, Uschuya admitted that the stones were hoaxes that he and his wife Irma Gutierrez had engraved them themselves and sold them to Cabrera". Oh right okay those ones, seems weird that the creation model can only rely on hoaxes and fallacies to trick its believers

    • @davidgardner863
      @davidgardner863 5 місяців тому +23

      But no dinosaur fossils.

    • @hopelessnerd6677
      @hopelessnerd6677 5 місяців тому +50

      Those are made for the gullible tourists by the locals.

  • @louisewelch5451
    @louisewelch5451 2 місяці тому +45

    I love this man. I wish him well. He doesn't deserve all the trials and charges. He was just trying to help our country. May God put a Hedge of Protection around him and his whole family. America owes him.....he didn't even take a salary. God bless him and his family.

    • @jackpackage4278
      @jackpackage4278 Місяць тому +4

      What is he on trial for?

    • @Angelface11
      @Angelface11 19 днів тому

      Lol... This is a different guy not the one you're thinking of that was in prison for not paying taxes. That guy's got a lot of knowledge but this guy is not him.

    • @jocelynmunn3764
      @jocelynmunn3764 День тому +1

      @@louisewelch5451 trials and charges? Terrific that's who I wanna take advice from

  • @Marie-zq1xr
    @Marie-zq1xr 9 днів тому +3

    Dinosaurs...When i found out about Fallen Angels, my 1st question was 'Didnt the fallen angels breed with animals?'

  • @darksouth2607
    @darksouth2607 5 місяців тому +389

    I've found things go best when you don't worry about it and leave it in Gods hands.

    • @bayraktarx1386
      @bayraktarx1386 5 місяців тому

      That's the reason dumb people are more happy by statistics.

    • @purityshallabide1645
      @purityshallabide1645 4 місяці тому +2

      Proverbs 25:2.. but of course you can still choose the blue pill...

    • @meanonymous8793
      @meanonymous8793 4 місяці тому +3

      AMEN & AMEN 🕎✝️🛐

    • @Mr.Mustgohard
      @Mr.Mustgohard 4 місяці тому

      What are you talking about?

    • @bayraktarx1386
      @bayraktarx1386 4 місяці тому +6

      Sure when you get sick don't go to doctor, just ask your god to help!

  • @msfox103able
    @msfox103able 4 місяці тому +86

    Could you imagine being Job and seeing leviathan. That would definitely be scary.

    • @eeeaten
      @eeeaten 4 місяці тому +9

      Imagine being Harry and seeing that whomping willow. Equally scary.

    • @AtZero138
      @AtZero138 4 місяці тому +1

      The Story of Jöb, tragic...
      Why God allowed Him to be tested with such, Sarrow and heartache..
      Why was the Devil given the Power to control, weather, Create Earthquakes, Pass Illness on his family?
      Just to.. Win a Bet?...
      Tragic

    • @rushanewright3599
      @rushanewright3599 4 місяці тому +6

      ​@@AtZero138 to show him(devil) that job going throu sorrow his faith remains

    • @ambots13
      @ambots13 4 місяці тому +2

      @@AtZero138 would you rather build your kingdom with karens and entitled brats? Utopia indeed.

    • @ducksparrowmybel8night430
      @ducksparrowmybel8night430 4 місяці тому

      ​@philo_o yee no tradegy at all getting his children murdered since he could just make new ones no biggie i guess

  • @user-ej1oe2jl9h
    @user-ej1oe2jl9h 2 місяці тому +121

    i would like to point out that Dinosaurs, or Dragons if you would like to call them that, are actually mentioned in the Bible.
    in Genesis 1:21 it's written; "God created the great sea monsters" However the Hebrew wording is התנינים הגדולים literal translation; Taninim HaG'dolim which should be translated as great or big, or huge serpents.
    The etymology of Dragon is from Old French dragon and directly from Latin draconem (nominative draco) meaning "huge serpent". from Greek drakon (genitive drakontos) meaning "serpent, giant seafish,".
    i am surprised he didn't show this, but the evidence is clear, if Dragon means Huge Serpent, and the Bible also said Huge Serpent...
    a consistency in meaning, it would make sense that Dragons existed and were created.

    • @christophermancini7334
      @christophermancini7334 Місяць тому +2

      😮 that’s crazy!!

    • @user-ej1oe2jl9h
      @user-ej1oe2jl9h Місяць тому +4

      @@christophermancini7334 i know man this blew me away when i saw it.

    • @menace4082
      @menace4082 Місяць тому +6

      Also mentioned in Job, as the Behemoth and Leviathan.

    • @user-ej1oe2jl9h
      @user-ej1oe2jl9h Місяць тому +5

      @@menace4082 right but this one is literally in the creation narrative.

    • @jerrydonquixote5927
      @jerrydonquixote5927 29 днів тому

      ​ fairy tales for ding-a-lings the Bible is nothing but Easter Bunny Tooth Fairy hell demons Jesus a bunch of silly fairy tales you ding-a-lings😂

  • @Nic-kx5dn
    @Nic-kx5dn Місяць тому +5

    Thank You God for having all the plans and We are your people.Christ is Our King for ever and ever.❤amen.

  • @richardlew3667
    @richardlew3667 5 місяців тому +205

    Before the word dinosaur was used, they were commonly known as dragons. Even the most arrogant champions and warriors wouldn't keep boasting about slaying dragons if they didn't exist unless they wanted to taint their reputations. The Merriam Webster dictionary hinted at possible dragons still existing at some remote forested mountain a hundred years ago. It would make sense that the dragons ended up getting hunted to extinction.

    • @gillchambers9008
      @gillchambers9008 5 місяців тому +3

      your referring to kimono dragons.

    • @richardlew3667
      @richardlew3667 5 місяців тому +22

      @@gillchambers9008 You're saying that those medieval knights were slaying komodo dragons all the way up in Northern Europe?

    • @HardHardMaster
      @HardHardMaster 5 місяців тому +16

      @@gillchambers9008 kimono dragons 😂😂😂

    • @SurvivorNumber1
      @SurvivorNumber1 5 місяців тому +3

      @@gillchambers9008No.

    • @Matt_Wilson01
      @Matt_Wilson01 5 місяців тому +20

      @@AwesomeWrenchwtf is a kimono dragon, it’s Komodo*

  • @user-gv3nv7jd5p
    @user-gv3nv7jd5p 5 місяців тому +146

    I'm a native Australian, old people around a campfire would tell old stories about some creatures they've seen or heard of back in the day, that they've use the word Kalawurru (Perenti Lizard) but on a bigger scale, what would these creatures look like? What were they seeing back in those days? Not only that like you've said, these creatures were hunted down and killed....

    • @drd1924
      @drd1924 5 місяців тому +15

      I agree, we would not have slept well knowing a T-Rex was on our trail and would have taken every measure in great number to kill every single last one, with a Great Feast of its flesh as a reward

    • @user-gv3nv7jd5p
      @user-gv3nv7jd5p 5 місяців тому +20

      As a Native Australian who read some of the stories in the Bible, there is a verse I think it's in Leviticus telling us what animals to kill and eat, as of watching this video I've realised that people of the time of Moses were told to eat plant eating animals (Herbivores) and in this video like you've said, some of the dinosaurs were herbivores, and they had a lot of meat, which is why the people would hunt them down as games, thanks for the video, keep it up👍😁

    • @user-sh1qm3ux8g
      @user-sh1qm3ux8g 5 місяців тому

      Even though these animals did not eat meat or humans
      Man still hunted them down
      Humans are just pure evil and destroy hunt and hurt anything every thing that is harmless and pure.
      God should of punished humans for killing animal
      Instead of punishing our defenceless animals for humans to destroy in such vile painful ways
      I have no sympathy whatsoever for meat eaters when they are ill
      Personal opinion free speech, whilst we are still allowed

    • @imarchand5232
      @imarchand5232 5 місяців тому +11

      The word dinosaur also means 'Big lizard/ giant lizard '

    • @grantsolomon7660
      @grantsolomon7660 5 місяців тому +6

      That's true the pirenti was around when people were but not trex ect..

  • @drewmccoy462
    @drewmccoy462 3 місяці тому +38

    My theory is that some of the dinosaurs were product of Fallen Angel cross species (Carnivores) that is why some of the most fierce ones were wiped out. This is why the floods and reset had to come. 🤷🏾‍♂️ I could be totally wrong but it makes alot of sense.

    • @henrietteschoise
      @henrietteschoise 2 місяці тому

      Agreed, realy, the croc eating melon doesnt take away its teeth,like the dino's teeth and claws, made to kill and eat Meat.Thats not good.God had to restore earth after the giant monsters.Before creation of men,men would not stand a chance against Dinosaurs.Just my thoughts, God only knows 😊

    • @gracealone5
      @gracealone5 2 місяці тому +3

      What an interesting idea!

    • @XxDeathxX509
      @XxDeathxX509 Місяць тому

      Flood came WAY AFTER human creation

    • @pomegranatepip2482
      @pomegranatepip2482 Місяць тому

      Do you do drugs? The hallucination type?

    • @goldenegg1063
      @goldenegg1063 Місяць тому

      @pomegranatepip2482
      Do you like getting bummed ?
      .
      By the big black type ?

  • @kimzchaos
    @kimzchaos Місяць тому +8

    In God's new earth, dinosaurs will live again and creation will triumph over evolution lies!

  • @bennychristiyan2646
    @bennychristiyan2646 3 місяці тому +265

    There is also the fact '95% of the ocean has not been explored '. Maybe the dinosaurs which lived in the water are still alive. Who knows

    • @joeysplats3209
      @joeysplats3209 3 місяці тому +33

      The nautilus. Alligators. Kimodo dragon. Another large lizard I forget the name. We have lots of dinosaurs!

    • @thoneras9611
      @thoneras9611 3 місяці тому +4

      Besides the fact that dinosaurs never have lived in the water...

    • @rascal211
      @rascal211 3 місяці тому +2

      Don't believe that nonsesne.

    • @lounaparrish3786
      @lounaparrish3786 3 місяці тому +6

      They found a group of Coelacanth pre historic fish of the coast of Madagascar.

    • @rascal211
      @rascal211 3 місяці тому +2

      @@lounaparrish3786 So, this doesn't mean dinosaurs were living with man.

  • @KarinaGarcia-ys1gs
    @KarinaGarcia-ys1gs 5 місяців тому +29

    We must realize that only God himself knows the truth. And as humans we'll never be able to know exactly everything. And our Lord Jesus Christ knows everything about the animals and everything on earth.

    • @tobias4411
      @tobias4411 5 місяців тому

      "We must realize that only the Flying spaghetti monster himself knows the truth.." Oh wait...
      "What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence". - C.Hitchens

    • @TheWolfalpino
      @TheWolfalpino 4 місяці тому +2

      Truth can be still revealed to humanity, but humans must leave their ego behind.
      There can be no revelation to someone who rejects God or is not ready to understand the next part of the picture.
      God revealing things to us, is most beautiful and powerful experience.

    • @TheWolfalpino
      @TheWolfalpino 4 місяці тому +1

      But we are in last times, when we have few time left to decide, before that moment.
      Selection already started

    • @tobias4411
      @tobias4411 4 місяці тому

      @@TheWolfalpino The truth is what the facts are. We have overwhelming evidence for evolution, and none for creation. Get over it.

    • @tobias4411
      @tobias4411 4 місяці тому

      @@TheWolfalpino Moment of what?

  • @RLJmusic4life
    @RLJmusic4life 5 місяців тому +75

    Concerning Genesis, there are a few things I find to be fascinating. At the fall of humans, the snake was cursed and crawled on its belly. So, that means that the snake had legs. The snake also spoke to Eve and she didn’t freak out and run to Adam to inform him about the talking snake that tried to deceive her. Apparently, the snake was gifted with speech. We also don’t know the size of the snake that spoke to Eve. The Bible doesn’t say that the snake was living in the tree. We assume that and use it in our depictions of the garden of Eden. I believe that the creature that deceived Eve in the garden was like a dragon. Later this intelligent dragon lost its speech and crawled in the dust. In Revelation, satan is referred to as a dragon. Another theory to consider is this: Perhaps in God’s perfect world that He created, all animals were gifted with speech and could communicate with humans, so the snake or dragon was not the only creature gifted with speech. All of that went away after the fall of the human race. Do you see how nasty sin is? It destroys everything. Thank God for Jesus.

    • @ShadowQuik
      @ShadowQuik 4 місяці тому +12

      Man this is a fascinating theory

    • @user-gi4qu5yy9q
      @user-gi4qu5yy9q 4 місяці тому +13

      It's even more interesting when you see that alot of snake species actually have limb buds that never develop into full limbs ....

    • @Funtime_Fz
      @Funtime_Fz 4 місяці тому +9

      I think the animal speech is back up from when this magician was on his way to the Moabites to curse the Israelites, his donkey(I think I remember it was a donkey) kept moving away from the angel who wanted to kill the magician. And when the Magician was confronted for beating his donkey, his donkey spoke and explain it's reasoning that he wanted to protect his owner from dying to the angel.

    • @kasarabian3274
      @kasarabian3274 4 місяці тому +2

      Have you been taking something illegal?

    • @kudossuazo
      @kudossuazo 4 місяці тому +9

      Scientist can’t explain why we have a leap year and what’s also fascinating is that it mentions in Joshua chapter 10 that God held the Sun still so they could finish fighting the war.
      Then Joshua spoke to the Lord in the day when the Lord delivered up the Amorites before the children of Israel, and he said in the sight of Israel:
      “Sun, stand still over Gibeon;
      And Moon, in the Valley of Aijalon.”
      13 So the sun stood still,
      And the moon stopped,
      Till the people had revenge
      Upon their enemies.
      Is this not written in the Book of Jasher? So the sun stood still in the midst of heaven, and did not hasten to go down for about a whole day. 14 And there has been no day like that, before it or after it, that the Lord heeded the voice of a man; for the Lord fought for Israel.

  • @user-cp7xn5pb4d
    @user-cp7xn5pb4d 15 днів тому +4

    Salt is a preservative. Ocean + salt = Fossils

  • @UnholyChurchboy
    @UnholyChurchboy 5 місяців тому +322

    How else do different groups of people who didn't know each other create the same image of a certain animal if they didn't see them in real life? How else do people who created these artifacts from hundreds, if not thousands of years ago, know how these dinosaurs looked and even interacted with each other if they didn't see them?
    I feel like referring back to scientific theories is refusing to address this real, excavated history.

    • @jockyoung4491
      @jockyoung4491 5 місяців тому +9

      What makes you think they are supposed to be dinosaurs?

    • @nathancook2852
      @nathancook2852 5 місяців тому +7

      How did different groups of people who didn't know each other all build pyramids around the same time? All those images are not the same, many animals will nuzzle or 'neck' with each other, and so yes, to some degree, what they drew had probably been observed. But coincidences do happen.

    • @infiad1275
      @infiad1275 5 місяців тому +36

      @@jockyoung4491 Because they look like the things we call dinosaurs? 😂

    • @davidgardner863
      @davidgardner863 5 місяців тому +17

      And yet not one human bone, not one human artifact, not one currently existing domestic animal has ever been found with any dinosaur fossils, ever, anywhere!

    • @jockyoung4491
      @jockyoung4491 5 місяців тому +7

      @@infiad1275
      They have legs, head and tail. How does that "prove" they are dinosaurs?

  • @davidphillips3953
    @davidphillips3953 5 місяців тому +130

    When I was a kid we went swimming in a lake in Florida and after a while a big gator came up to the dock presumably to eat us so naturally we got out and started throwing grapefruits growing on a tree nearby and he just kept eating those grapefruits!

    • @miscamisca6775
      @miscamisca6775 5 місяців тому +5

      So grapefruits tastes better than humans ?

    • @ianlister9645
      @ianlister9645 5 місяців тому +12

      Would have had nice fresh breath

    • @DavidPhillips-rs5dq
      @DavidPhillips-rs5dq 5 місяців тому +10

      ​@@miscamisca6775 possibly but we didn't want to give him the chance to do a taste test

    • @ZeddisDead
      @ZeddisDead 4 місяці тому +4

      If you've ever juiced a whole grapefruit with the peel you'd know just how acidic and unpleasant the peel is.

    • @Randylayhe001
      @Randylayhe001 4 місяці тому +6

      Don’t feed alligators, not only is it stupid it’s illegal.

  • @elizabethanthony3916
    @elizabethanthony3916 2 місяці тому +131

    When i received my first Bible at nine years old I thought Genesis 6 explained the dinosaurs when it said " There were giants in the earth in those days ..." At that age, unlike now, "the sons of God coming unto the daughters of men" didnt mean much to me and seemed unconnected with the " giants", the innocence of childhood 😊

    • @BaptistJoshua
      @BaptistJoshua 2 місяці тому +9

      Just so you know, the sons of God in that context were human beings. Angels cannot procreate, as Jesus mentions. And fallen angels I highly doubt can magically gain abilities.

    • @rollerbug21
      @rollerbug21 2 місяці тому +18

      The Sons of God were the fallen angels that broke the rules and procreated with the woman...they created the giants which were the nephilium...they were trying to mess up the seed of the Messiah..

    • @BaptistJoshua
      @BaptistJoshua 2 місяці тому +4

      @@rollerbug21 False.
      [Matthew 22:30 KJV] 30 For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven.
      [Mark 12:25 KJV] 25 For when they shall rise from the dead, they neither marry, nor are given in marriage; but are as the angels which are in heaven.

    • @BaptistJoshua
      @BaptistJoshua 2 місяці тому +2

      @@rollerbug21 [Genesis 6:2 KJV] 2 That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they [were] fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.

    • @BaptistJoshua
      @BaptistJoshua 2 місяці тому

      [Gen 6:2 KJV] 2 That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they [were] fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.

  • @jenniferpatricehallman9963
    @jenniferpatricehallman9963 19 днів тому +6

    In the original Hebrew text, the word for “day” also meant “a period of time”. Therefore, if the author (Moses), was speaking of 7 periods of time, instead of 7 days, we don’t know how long those periods of time were- they could’ve been thousands of years each! 4:53

    • @aluna1234
      @aluna1234 14 днів тому +2

      Right! God is outside of time as well so who is to say what a day to Him actually means. I'm not sure if I believe the earth is young or millions of years old, but I do know we will never really know what a day to God is until we are with Him

    • @orettamurray8844
      @orettamurray8844 4 дні тому

      No. He clearly states the evening and the morning were a day. It is 6 literal days of creation.

    • @jenniferpatricehallman9963
      @jenniferpatricehallman9963 3 дні тому

      @@orettamurray8844 how do you know how long a day was- I don’t even know-

    • @orettamurray8844
      @orettamurray8844 3 дні тому

      @@jenniferpatricehallman9963 it's not rocket science. Read the text in Genesis 1. It says an EVENING and MORNING were a day.

    • @maLc...
      @maLc... 3 дні тому

      its true that the hebrew word for day is ambiguous but its also just as imperative to look at the context which heavily supports a day and night cycle. also its important to note that the same hebrew word for day used in genesis is also used all throughout the old testament but no one ever questions if jonah was in the belly of the big fish for millions of years or if it rained for centuries before the flood resided.

  • @whiteblood9165
    @whiteblood9165 4 місяці тому +117

    Actually, the Bible talks about the Behemoth and the Laviathan. Which are enormous creatures. Maybe bigger than dinosaurs.

    • @MWesley75
      @MWesley75 4 місяці тому +10

      Yup-Job 40&41

    • @robertlemoine4404
      @robertlemoine4404 4 місяці тому +4

      And are fictional.

    • @nick6253
      @nick6253 4 місяці тому +22

      ​@@robertlemoine4404 Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Putting scripture aside, we're finding new animals constantly, and are discovering new fossils as well. To say a creature like behemoth never existed when we have titanosaurids and many other sauropods is just lazy

    • @andreek8559
      @andreek8559 4 місяці тому

      No, those two were borrowed from other Mesopotamian religions.
      See, Judaism and Christianity are just the last remnant of religion coming from that area until Islam that is. And all of them are an accumulation of all the religion from that area. Usually through war and the defeat of the other nation. People were captured and force to adapt to the new religion of their masters. They did with minor tweaks and changes. Quite fascinating. But we won’t get that depth from that guy.

    • @ZRBx4
      @ZRBx4 4 місяці тому

      Elephant. Is behemoth

  • @bettyc.parker-young1437
    @bettyc.parker-young1437 5 місяців тому +287

    I'm 64 and I ask my Dad if there were dinosaurs in the Bible and he said yes. I was about six then. He showed me and I believed he showed me theTruth. ❤

    • @marniekilbourne608
      @marniekilbourne608 5 місяців тому +17

      And where in the Bible does it say anything about dinosaurs? The "land animal" theory is very flimsy. God or whatever you call the higher power gave us brains to think for ourselves and to learn things such as science and consider them and a broader view than what one single text written about a thousand years ago and edited by MAN says. An arc that holds two of every animal, including the dinosaurs so he says, is not at all a thing that ever was built by one guy and his family! No arc would possibly be large enough! Also, how did they also have the time and ability to go around the world collecting two of every animal, insect, bird, etc. and be building this glorious amazing arc at the same time?! Furthermore, why would God or whatever higher power ever identify only ONE man and his family as suitable people to continue living?! That is utter insanity. Not only does he only deem one man and his family to be good enough but he floods the world and kills everyone else?! Funny how there is a whole lot of terrible people in the world today and there always have been yet God just did the flood judgement that one time when he was really pissed and what vowed to never do it again?! Nevermind that brings us right back to the INCEST problem of Adam and Eve. If only Noah's family was left to repopulate the earth then MORE INCEST had to have occured! Come on people! Why do we have so many races of people if we are all descended from first Adam and Eve (hope nobody mentioned Lillith to you) then from Noah and his family? Ludacris!

    • @CiscoWes
      @CiscoWes 5 місяців тому

      @@marniekilbourne608 𝐴𝑛𝑑 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝐵𝑖𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑒𝑠 𝑖𝑡 𝑠𝑎𝑦 𝑎𝑛𝑦𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑎𝑢𝑟𝑠?
      Interesting. Maybe you were looking for the actual word “dinosaur” which would explain your ignorance of this. You won’t find the term “dinosaur” in the Bible as the term was first coined back in 1841. You’ll find several different names in scripture, such as the Hebrew word tanniyn, behemoth, or serpent, or leviathan. There’s almost 30 instances of dinosaurs mentioned in the Old Testament. Psalm 74:13, Isaiah 27:1, Psalm 104:26, Job 41, Job 41:33, Job 40:17-19, as well as other references.
      𝑇ℎ𝑒 "𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑙" 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑜𝑟𝑦 𝑖𝑠 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑦 𝑓𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑠𝑦. 𝐺𝑜𝑑 𝑜𝑟 𝑤ℎ𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑡ℎ𝑒 ℎ𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑔𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑢𝑠 𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑠 𝑡𝑜 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑘 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑠𝑒𝑙𝑣𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑡𝑜 𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠 𝑠𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑎 𝑏𝑟𝑜𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑣𝑖𝑒𝑤 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑛 𝑤ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑜𝑛𝑒 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑙𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑥𝑡 𝑤𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑡𝑒𝑛 𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑎 𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑠𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠 𝑎𝑔𝑜 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑏𝑦 𝑀𝐴𝑁 𝑠𝑎𝑦𝑠.
      So you didn’t know where there’s mentions of dinosaurs in scripture, but now we are supposed to believe your assertion that the Bible was written and edited by man. The notion that the Bible was just written by man is “very flimsy”. There are things written in scripture that man simply didn’t know about, until it was “discovered” almost 2,000 years later. Not to mention fulfilled Bible prophecy, archaeological accuracies, historical accuracies. We’re still finding ancient long lost cities that end up being mentioned somewhere in the Bible. You’re really putting a lot of stock in the abilities of man to simply come up with all of this without any help. Secondly, the notion that it was edited throughout history is also “very flimsy”. Keep in mind the scriptures were translated into several different languages and distributed all over the world, and several copies were made with painstaking accuracy with the scribes. If someone wanted to change something in scripture, the changes would immediately become known as they wouldn’t match all of the other copies.
      𝐴𝑛 𝑎𝑟𝑐 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 ℎ𝑜𝑙𝑑𝑠 𝑡𝑤𝑜 𝑜𝑓 𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑦 𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑙, 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑎𝑢𝑟𝑠 𝑠𝑜 ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑦𝑠, 𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑎𝑡 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑎 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑤𝑎𝑠 𝑏𝑢𝑖𝑙𝑡 𝑏𝑦 𝑜𝑛𝑒 𝑔𝑢𝑦 𝑎𝑛𝑑 ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑓𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑦! 𝑁𝑜 𝑎𝑟𝑐 𝑤𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑏𝑙𝑦 𝑏𝑒 𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑢𝑔ℎ! 𝐴𝑙𝑠𝑜, ℎ𝑜𝑤 𝑑𝑖𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑦 𝑎𝑙𝑠𝑜 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑡𝑜 𝑔𝑜 𝑎𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑙𝑑 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡𝑤𝑜 𝑜𝑓 𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑦 𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑙, 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡, 𝑏𝑖𝑟𝑑, 𝑒𝑡𝑐. 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑏𝑒 𝑏𝑢𝑖𝑙𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑔𝑙𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑢𝑠 𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑧𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑎𝑟𝑐 𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑒 𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒?! 𝐹𝑢𝑟𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑒, 𝑤ℎ𝑦 𝑤𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑 𝐺𝑜𝑑 𝑜𝑟 𝑤ℎ𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟 ℎ𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑦 𝑜𝑛𝑙𝑦 𝑂𝑁𝐸 𝑚𝑎𝑛 𝑎𝑛𝑑 ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑓𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑦 𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑜𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑡𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑒 𝑙𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑔?! 𝑇ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑖𝑠 𝑢𝑡𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑦.
      There’s several very informative videos and texts online that demonstrates not only how, but the extreme durability of the ark and how it could all have worked fine. There’s even a museum in Kentucky dedicated to the ark which is very informative to say the least.
      𝑁𝑜𝑡 𝑜𝑛𝑙𝑦 𝑑𝑜𝑒𝑠 ℎ𝑒 𝑜𝑛𝑙𝑦 𝑑𝑒𝑒𝑚 𝑜𝑛𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑛 𝑎𝑛𝑑 ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑓𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑦 𝑡𝑜 𝑏𝑒 𝑔𝑜𝑜𝑑 𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑢𝑔ℎ 𝑏𝑢𝑡 ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑑𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑙𝑑 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑘𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑠 𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑦𝑜𝑛𝑒 𝑒𝑙𝑠𝑒?! 𝐹𝑢𝑛𝑛𝑦 ℎ𝑜𝑤 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑤ℎ𝑜𝑙𝑒 𝑙𝑜𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑜𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑙𝑑 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑎𝑦 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑙𝑤𝑎𝑦𝑠 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑏𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑦𝑒𝑡 𝐺𝑜𝑑 𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡 𝑑𝑖𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑑 𝑗𝑢𝑑𝑔𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑜𝑛𝑒 𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑛 ℎ𝑒 𝑤𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦 𝑝𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑑 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑤ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑣𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑑 𝑡𝑜 𝑛𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑜 𝑖𝑡 𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑖𝑛?!
      It’s always peculiar to see drive-by atheists in these type comment sections proclaim some moral judgment (what are these morals based on from an athiest? They’ll have to steal morality from God and try to use it against Him) and then fault God for killing evil people. Makes zero sense.
      𝑁𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠 𝑢𝑠 𝑟𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑏𝑎𝑐𝑘 𝑡𝑜 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝐼𝑁𝐶𝐸𝑆𝑇 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑚 𝑜𝑓 𝐴𝑑𝑎𝑚 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝐸𝑣𝑒. 𝐼𝑓 𝑜𝑛𝑙𝑦 𝑁𝑜𝑎ℎ'𝑠 𝑓𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑦 𝑤𝑎𝑠 𝑙𝑒𝑓𝑡 𝑡𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑡ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑀𝑂𝑅𝐸 𝐼𝑁𝐶𝐸𝑆𝑇 ℎ𝑎𝑑 𝑡𝑜 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑜𝑐𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑒𝑑! 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑒 𝑜𝑛 𝑝𝑒𝑜𝑝𝑙𝑒! 𝑊ℎ𝑦 𝑑𝑜 𝑤𝑒 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑠𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑦 𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑝𝑒𝑜𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑖𝑓 𝑤𝑒 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑑 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑓𝑖𝑟𝑠𝑡 𝐴𝑑𝑎𝑚 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝐸𝑣𝑒 (ℎ𝑜𝑝𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑏𝑜𝑑𝑦 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑑 𝐿𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑡𝑜 𝑦𝑜𝑢) 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑁𝑜𝑎ℎ 𝑎𝑛𝑑 ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑓𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑦? 𝐿𝑢𝑑𝑎𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑠!
      There literally wasn’t any other options. Technically we’re all brother and sister, all being traced back to Adam and Eve. All of the genetic information was present in Adam and Eve that could account for all the diversity. “Why do we have so many races”? We don’t. We only have one race.

    • @jockedredd1329
      @jockedredd1329 5 місяців тому +12

      And then you grew up and got a better understanding of how the world works. ...right?

    • @bettyc.parker-young1437
      @bettyc.parker-young1437 5 місяців тому +52

      @@jockedredd1329 Yes, I know exactly how the world works. That's why I believe in God and not man. Please do not reply. I have believed all my life. I pray you do the same before it's too late. Just don't put it off. God bless you.❤️

    • @bettyc.parker-young1437
      @bettyc.parker-young1437 5 місяців тому +24

      @@marniekilbourne608 With God all things are possible! You need to get your heart and life right now! Do not reply back. You are in a place in your life of struggle. Please give your heart and life to God. Before it is too late. God really loves you.❤️

  • @mvanluven78
    @mvanluven78 5 місяців тому +105

    The fact that people don't know fossil and bone are not the same is kinda frightening. 😢

    • @michaeldc951
      @michaeldc951 5 місяців тому +1

      Nope.

    • @oscaralegre3683
      @oscaralegre3683 5 місяців тому +8

      isnt obvious they arent the same? they use different words for a reason

    • @michaeldc951
      @michaeldc951 5 місяців тому +20

      @@oscaralegre3683 no, because alot of people think fossils are just bones that have been fossilized/turned to rock. They don’t know the term fossil covers many more things like impressions or plant matter etc

    • @ZeddisDead
      @ZeddisDead 4 місяці тому +20

      People are also confused by fake plaster replicas of dinosaurs in museums.

    • @nathancook2852
      @nathancook2852 4 місяці тому +2

      @@ZeddisDead HaHaHa, nice try. Organisms are symmetrical. If you have one side, you basically have both sides. Especially if you have two different sides of the same organism from different digs, which we do. Don't act like we don't know what the dino's skeletons looked like, we have plenty of examples. Do you really think if we have the left side of the rib cage, we don't know what the right side looked like? Same goes for limbs. Good grief.

  • @WS-nj7nq
    @WS-nj7nq 28 днів тому +2

    I want to point out something. They are saying that modern day we don't have things that breathe fire, but we do have very similar things and definitely much weirder things. There is a lizard that can spew its blood from their eyes, and because it is so acidic it burns its offender.
    There's another thing, about Whales, when they become beached, the gasses build up so strongly that they explode. There's some kind of way to all the things found in nature that would propose a possibility of something able to produce a belch of flame, at the least, or regurgitation of acids strong enough to melt or even ignite something.
    Something else to add. Our land used to be all connected. Meaning a meteor or other, or fire, etc, could spread without much resistance of having to cross disconnects of lakes and rivers to get to another island.

  • @BlurryZurry
    @BlurryZurry Місяць тому +33

    You just blew my mind. Im just about a purely logical person and thats where believing in God and the bible has been hard. But these were the most logical explanations I've heard. I now believe in it.

    • @GodisGod100-bi
      @GodisGod100-bi Місяць тому +8

      God bless you.

    • @philiprobinson2011
      @philiprobinson2011 Місяць тому +1

      Wow you are easily convinced.

    • @BlurryZurry
      @BlurryZurry Місяць тому +2

      @@philiprobinson2011 do you know what hyper cynicism is? I'm not easily convinced of anything

    • @philiprobinson2011
      @philiprobinson2011 Місяць тому

      @@BlurryZurry The evidence would suggest otherwise.

    • @BlurryZurry
      @BlurryZurry Місяць тому +2

      ​@philiprobinson2011 😂😂😂😂 ok so what's your theory?

  • @poundtrader1414
    @poundtrader1414 5 місяців тому +261

    the fossil record does not convincingly document a single transition from one species to another.

    • @jockyoung4491
      @jockyoung4491 5 місяців тому +29

      It is rarely that fine-scale (although there are exceptions), but the transitions are obvious from the fossil series we do have.

    • @poundtrader1414
      @poundtrader1414 5 місяців тому

      @@jockyoung4491 If the theory of evolution was true, we should have discovered millions upon millions of transitional fossils that show the development of one species into another species. Instead, we have zero.

    • @1VFA666
      @1VFA666 5 місяців тому +39

      _the fossil record does not convincingly document a single transition_ It does to paleontologists. That a not educated creationist finds the overwhelming evidence unconvincing is not science's problem.

    • @Bomtombadi1
      @Bomtombadi1 5 місяців тому +1

      ⁠@@poundtrader1414that’s not a prediction of evolution, nitwit. You assume every creature that has ever lived has been fossilized.

    • @poundtrader1414
      @poundtrader1414 5 місяців тому

      @@1VFA666 If the theory of evolution was true, we should have discovered millions upon millions of transitional fossils that show the development of one species into another species. Instead, we have zero.

  • @Jong23
    @Jong23 3 місяці тому +123

    If you take a glass of dirt mixed in with rocks and seashells, and throw some water in halfway and give it a good shake. Let it settle for less than 60 seconds and you’ll start to have layers forming in that glass. Now take a worldwide flood that lasts 40 days, and takes 1 year for the water to recede to be able to walk on land. That’s how we have found seashells on mountaintops, and dinosaurs mixed in with aquatic creatures.

    • @p3rryn
      @p3rryn 2 місяці тому +3

      Relax... I'm not with the dude in the video, but think bro.. why is it we have these perfect dinosaur bones that were clearly here before civilization itself, but don't have record of all the tombs of Egypt? There are so many artifacts that they say over time have just withered away, but these bones weren't? And the ark is now known to not even be a boat so how did the Bible get that wrong? So I'm not with buddy in the video, I just want you to think of some of the things we have claimed to not know of while knowing we have all these bones to perfectly reconstruct a dinosaur

    • @MurdahBassRecords
      @MurdahBassRecords 2 місяці тому +12

      ​@p3rryn "The Ark is now known to not have been a boat?"
      Likewise, the Hebrew word for "ark" (tevah) is nearly identical to the Babylonian word for an oblong boat (ṭubbû), especially given that "v" and "b" are the same letter in Hebrew
      Your argument doesnt make any sense. The bible talks about the leviathan in the deep and the behemoth on land while humans were alive.
      Why is there so many water dinosaurs (reptiles) sightings still existing today? Because the flood wiped out the land dinos and the water ones thrived.
      Just cuz they dont have all the egyptian tombs and artifacts but we got dinosaur bones doesnt prove anything. They didnt prove gorillas existed until the 60s or 70s or the giant squid but it did. 🤷‍♂️

    • @p3rryn
      @p3rryn 2 місяці тому +4

      @@MurdahBassRecords interesting you say the Hebrew meaning of the word ark. "Oblong boat" good info to absorb. It makes sense now. They found tablets explaining the blueprint to the ark. It was more of a disk shape. Oblong boat fits. Oval shaped. The puzzle is connecting. Appreciate that bro. But that's another thing that gets me when it comes to gorillas, chimps, etc. If we came from them where are the in between stages? Why aren't they walking around but the 1st stage of us still exists..?

    • @MurdahBassRecords
      @MurdahBassRecords 2 місяці тому +2

      @@p3rryn I too beleive in creation brother so cant answer the us coming from chimps thing. I ask the exact same question myself, Wheres the proof of this inbetween thing?. I dont beleive in the "evolution theory" but i do beleive God used evolution for the ark situation. I doubt he had 2 of every species of cat on that boat or all the species of cow/buffalo But i beleive as do many other creation scientists thst God has 1 species of cat which then evolved to the different types of big/little cats we have today or 1 type of buffalo which evolved into the different species we have globally based on genetics or location/environment etc...evolution was taken over for the athiest theory or darwinism but evolution doesnt have to be a dirty word if God used it to his advantage. But i do not beleive humans evolved from monkeys thats silly.

    • @eriolduterion8855
      @eriolduterion8855 2 місяці тому +2

      I'll depend on the evidence that proves and demonstrates plate tectonics. "When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things."

  • @Gorilla_warfare
    @Gorilla_warfare 12 днів тому +1

    When he describes ‘National Geographic’ as a faith building magazine lol

  • @scottmcfarland5830
    @scottmcfarland5830 3 місяці тому +19

    The book of Enoch explains that one of the grave sins committed by specefic fallen angels, Azazel in particular, was cross-hybridization between angels and humans & animals and humans. Could the T rex be an invention also?

    • @andytyrrell5153
      @andytyrrell5153 Місяць тому +2

      Book of Enoch is not Scripture.

    • @philiprobinson2011
      @philiprobinson2011 Місяць тому

      When you get your facts from the bible, anything could be, and likely is an invention.

  • @kitmolloy1973
    @kitmolloy1973 2 місяці тому +16

    My main thought even as a child. Creation in the Bible, why is it assumed that, a day to God is a 24 hour day. Something that is infinite would not use our concept of time.

    • @npeace312
      @npeace312 2 місяці тому +2

      I thought that as well but as I learn more and more about the Bible I do believe one day literally was one day. We cannot fathom God's mind or power so who are we to explain it?

    • @XxDeathxX509
      @XxDeathxX509 Місяць тому +2

      In this case it WAS because the people writing the bible was using the terms day and night which are existing terminologies that would make sense to us. If it was different they’d of used centuries or eons to describe it the way God intended. So no that’s not correct

    • @minnesota0
      @minnesota0 Місяць тому +3

      God uses terms we can understand. We cant even understand dinosaurs, how could we comprehend, that time does not exist in the kingdom of God? That time runs for us, because of our sins?
      I say because of our sins, because from what the bible and christians say, god gave us death as a 'punishment' for our sins. In the garden of Eden time didn't "work"
      Anyways, I reccomend the channel "Living waters". It has videos that personally, reasurred me about things

    • @philiprobinson2011
      @philiprobinson2011 Місяць тому

      Perhaps not, but that is the term he used in the Bible. So maybe God was not being strictly honest in his Genesis account?

    • @Mr-Corey-June
      @Mr-Corey-June Місяць тому

      The Hebrew word for day is "yom", it can mean just a watch, about 3 hours, daylight, a 24 hour day, the age of a mans life, or a long passing of time.
      Psalm 90:4 (WMB, Public Domain)
      ⁴ For a thousand years in your sight are just like yesterday when it is past, like a watch in the night.
      2 Peter 3:8 (WMB, Public Domain)
      ⁸ But don't forget this one thing, beloved, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.
      A short or long passing of time. I find the Greek word "eon" fits better in Genesis chapter 1. The 1st 3 yom's have no sunset because the sun isn't created until the 4th day. And still each day/yom is evening and morning, no afternoon or sunset. A day is sunset to sunset, hum, make one wonder.
      We see stars at night that are millions of light years away, not just 6000 light years away, and new stars are still being made. So I feel the word eon fits better.
      What about man? Has dogma muddled the understanding through scribes, copies, translations and influence of those of power to do so? It kind of looks that way, but we can still glean out the truth in scripture, and strengthen our faith from it. Does this change the claim that the garden of Eden and Adam was created on the 6th day? The man who was created to "till the soil", Farmer Adam is in chapter 2.
      Both men and women "they" were created during the 6th eon. Genesis 1:27-31 doesn't state that God breathed his spirit into these humans of the sixth day. The garden wasn't created yet, that's in Genesis Ch2, after the the 7th day/eon sabbath was created and made holy. This will be explained with Genesis 6:2,3.
      Genesis 1:27 (WMB, Public Domain)
      ²⁷ God created man in his own image. In God’s image he created him; male and female he created them.
      They were flesh humans with no soul/spirit.
      With an old Earth mankind in Genesis 1 was told be fruitful and multiply. This was instructed to the 6th day/eon peoples long before Farmer Adam was created 6000+ years ago. The Homo Sapiens, Neanderthals, caveman, etc., mortal mankind was created in/on the 6th eon. It was their female descendant daughters, many thousands of years later that farmer Adams sons (sons of God) married in Genesis 6;2. It is who Cain married in the land of Nod and "not" his sister which would be incest,(and change God, Hebrews 13:8).
      Genesis 6:2, 3 (WMB, Public Domain)
      ² God’s sons saw that men’s daughters were beautiful, and they took any that they wanted for themselves as wives. ³ The LORD said, “My Spirit will not strive with man forever, because he also is flesh; so his days will be one hundred twenty years.”
      There are 2 groups of people in verses 2 & 3, both are flesh ("also is flesh"), but only one group has the Spirit/Soul from God. It is the smallest group and has a long lifespan. Both groups of people, Spirit/Soul-flesh and souless flesh were to be destroyed in 120 years by the flood. Adam and Eve's kids didn't marry each other. That would make God corrupt by causing incest by Him.
      Leviticus 20:17 (WMB, Public Domain)
      ¹⁷ “ ‘If a man takes his sister-his father’s daughter, or his mother’s daughter-and sees her nakedness, and she sees his nakedness, it is a shameful thing. They shall be cut off in the sight of the children of their people. He has uncovered his sister’s nakedness. He shall bear his iniquity.
      Cain may have met a cute woman that was Homo Sapiens, hybrid with Neanderthal or Denisovin DNA, (that was a good cook, kept a clean home/cave, various firm assets.). This would explain why many of today's humans have traces of Neanderthal DNA, and other human species that are found in fossils.
      Modern man is a hybrid of the 6th day people and the Farmer Adam "sons of God" race. We have all inherited that farmer Adam soul from God, as did the 8 souls saved on the ark, 1 Peter 3;20. Any mixing of 6th day people before or even after the ark would inherit that soul from God. Was the flood 120 years from Genesis 6:3? Must be because our lifespan isn't 120 years, and next is the story of Noah.
      According to the Bible, who are the sons of God? Neither angels or fallen angels are the "son's of God", they may take physical form, but have no DNA for reproduction. I do believe the Masorites did more than just add vowels, they altered scripture. They may be the ones that changed "angels" into "son's of God in Job 1:6, 2:1, and 38:7. these are translation errors which is proven with the Bible and the LXX. The descendants of Farmer Adam are the "son's of God" with inherited DNA and title, Luke 3:38, John 10:34, Psalms 82:6, Hosea 1:10, etc.
      Job 1:6, 2:1, 38:7 (LXX, 2012 Septuagint)
      ⁶ And it came to pass on a day, that behold, the angels of God came to stand before the Lord, and the devil came with them.
      ¹ And it came to pass on a certain day, that the angels of God came to stand before the Lord, and the devil came among them to stand before the Lord.
      ⁴ Where was you when I founded the earth? tell me now, if you have knowledge, ⁵ who set the measures of it, if you know? or who stretched a line upon it? ⁶ On what are its rings fastened? and who is he that laid the corner-stone upon it? ⁷ When the stars were made, all my angels praised me with a loud voice.
      Job 1:6, 2:1, 38:4-7 (WMB)
      ⁶ Now on the day when God’s sons came to present themselves before the LORD, Satan also came among them.
      ¹ Again, on the day when God’s sons came to present themselves before the LORD, Satan came also among them to present himself before the LORD.
      ⁴ “Where were you when I laid the foundations of the earth? Declare, if you have understanding. ⁵ Who determined its measures, if you know? Or who stretched the line on it? ⁶ What were its foundations fastened on? Or who laid its cornerstone, ⁷ when the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?
      The LXX is very different from translations based on the Masoretic Text. Was mankind as in the plural "sons" made before the stars? No. So it was not sons of God, but angels. Yet the 3 verses in Job are what many use to claim that the sons of God in Genesis 6:2 were fallen angels that married human women, had children called the Nephilim. This is proven false with scripture.
      Nephilim; Infamous people, good, bad, tall, leaders, heroes, etc. Since fallen angels are evil spirits, demons. Could they possess humans or beasts? Yes, but that's not marriage or reproduction, they are not flesh, they have no DNA.
      Hebrews 1:5 (WMB, Public Domain)
      ⁵ For to which of the angels did he say at any time, “You are my Son. Today I have become your father?” and again, “I will be to him a Father, and he will be to me a Son?”
      Farmer Adam of Genesis ch. 2 was the first living soul flesh human that we all descended from. He was created 6000+ years ago. Nothing is changed by understanding of the creation day being an eon. But dogma of the church and the past tries to alter what we can see in the stars at night that are millions of light years away or what's in our DNA. No we didn't evolve from monkeys, but we do have DNA mixed in with our Grand-pappy Farmer Adam the 1st living soul. Much has been lost in translations. And warped by the Jewish fable "Book of Enoch" written in the 3rd century BC along with the "Book of Jubilees".

  • @Krullmatic
    @Krullmatic 2 місяці тому +30

    What gets me, is they've never found a whole Dinosaur fossil in tact. They've found bits and bobs, like a femur, or half a skull, and they use their imagination, and create what they think the whole dinosaur would look like.

    • @thoneras9611
      @thoneras9611 2 місяці тому +4

      Yes, because these fossils are million years old. And you can reconstruct meat and muscle structures quite well from bones. People learn to do stuff like this.

    • @felixamadi2237
      @felixamadi2237 2 місяці тому +1

      ​@@thoneras9611Like literally

    • @baxstermarconi3897
      @baxstermarconi3897 Місяць тому

      Turn off millions of years old you just missed the video​@@thoneras9611

    • @nathancook2852
      @nathancook2852 Місяць тому +3

      @@baxstermarconi3897 No, we can just think critically and have some knowledge of science. We also don't find "bits and bobs". We find a lot of skeleton 50, 60, 70 % complete. We also have many fossils of the same organism and you can compare all of them and see what the full structure would look like. Skin covering, coloration, etc., yeah that can be interpretation, but we KNOW what the skeletons look like.

    • @GodsChild-cd1xn
      @GodsChild-cd1xn Місяць тому +2

      I agree, no way that they would know what a dinosaur actually looks like.

  • @MusicListener7351
    @MusicListener7351 Місяць тому +2

    Another theory: are dinosaurs the nephilim demons / the giants mentioned in the time of Genesis? The book of Enoch mentions the nephilim interfered with animal creatures also.

  • @owlfethurz8377
    @owlfethurz8377 5 місяців тому +94

    This is fascinating. I wish I could see the cathedrals with artwork showing the dinosaurs in person. Can you imagine that people were walking directly on the brass carvings in that cathedral until someone finally protected it by covering it with a rug?

    • @nathancook2852
      @nathancook2852 5 місяців тому +5

      Or maybe they covered it with a rug because people were trying to claim nonsense like Calvin here when they saw it.

    • @andreshenriquez3087
      @andreshenriquez3087 5 місяців тому +3

      They were dragons not Dino.

    • @Zipmegolden
      @Zipmegolden 5 місяців тому +1

      ​@andreshenrique. Yes, they would of had a different name no doubt!

    • @icxcnika1823
      @icxcnika1823 5 місяців тому +6

      To all: Check out the Saint George and the dragon 🐉 story. There were some of them still going around during the Saint’s days. God bless you all. ✝️. 🌴🐊🇵🇬

    • @hadassah3560
      @hadassah3560 5 місяців тому

      ​@@nathancook2852he is not trying to claim...he is laying a claim a truth claim

  • @deja_
    @deja_ 5 місяців тому +31

    This is actually something I just expressed that I find disheartening from the scientific community. They say something is absolute and if you challenge it then you're some kind of wacko or conspiracy theorist. Until a decade or so later new information comes out and it turns out your observations were correct all along but because it's backed by science it's no longer considered crazy.

    • @eeeaten
      @eeeaten 5 місяців тому +4

      What is an example of something you were correct all along about?

    • @mrvoidhiker
      @mrvoidhiker 3 місяці тому

      Scientists have been rejecting each other over many things throughout history like how atoms work, the solar system, black holes and such. It's not until they get undeniable proof that they'll finally back down although it takes a while because they'll want to claim fake data or something first. Imagine if people had iPhones and recorded Jesus' resurrection. People and scientists today will just say it's a deep fake, green screen, CGI, AI something just like we do with anything today. I used to be a non-believer and was astray until I was saved by Jesus, and I realize now that back then I would never have been able to be saved by people because I had zero faith and only Jesus restored that in me.

    • @bertoldo1272
      @bertoldo1272 3 місяці тому

      everything Is scientifically acceptable if you have scientific proves, the adjective should be self-explenatory

    • @willischwabe1324
      @willischwabe1324 Місяць тому

      ​@@eeeatenWhen doctors found the idea of micro organisms ridiculous and how washing hands with no visible dirt on it was not necessary.
      When they claimed smoking is good for you.
      When they claimed "safe and effective" when it was neither safe nor effective and everyone could see it.
      Or the food pyramid that is just a fabrication.
      Or how they said "eating fat makes you fat! Better eat carbs instead!" without any evidence, which was enough to start a whole crusade apparently. Until people found out, that actually a fatty diet can be super healthy and they turned on the carbs.
      It is utter insanity how ideology and lower motives plague science.
      After all, doctors, scientists, etc. are just PEOPLE. Many forget that and think that these people are some sort of incarnation of the "holy ghost of science" that comes upon them, when they put on the white lab coat like it is a rebirth - a sign they left their old human self behind.
      It is really religious how people believe in science and view scientists as priests of their religion and act so dogmatic in their beliefs and think they are "better" than "these silly Christians, with their priests and their beliefs and dogmatism"

    • @davidlagesse3398
      @davidlagesse3398 23 дні тому +1

      YES!
      I am 76, I was in 5th or 6th grade when I noticed on a map that the coasts of Africa and South America matched together (like a broken cookie). The Teacher thought I was nuts and so did the rest of the class. Many years later that became a scientific FACT!

  • @A-Clear_View
    @A-Clear_View 5 місяців тому +58

    There may be confirmation bias here, but this actually makes a lot of sense

    • @getmulah619
      @getmulah619 5 місяців тому +6

      Keep digging.

    • @al1engreyassh0le4
      @al1engreyassh0le4 4 місяці тому

      @@getmulah619i love the cult of science! They are the biggest fools of the 21st century! Brought to you by Anthony Fauci and the WHO… “trust the science”. 😂

    • @pomegranatepip2482
      @pomegranatepip2482 Місяць тому

      @@A-Clear_View yes. There is confirmation bias. A shit ton of it. It’s what creationists rely on to convince people with their gobbledegook “science”.

    • @pomegranatepip2482
      @pomegranatepip2482 10 днів тому

      @@A-Clear_View there certainly is confirmation bias, and no, it makes very little sense.

  • @aishasalami4632
    @aishasalami4632 15 днів тому +1

    Breed them and i will teach(brainwashed, mislead, confuse and destroy ) them really got me. May God teach our children as he has promised to in the book of Isaiah 54:13 in Jesus name.

  • @tonymallet2776
    @tonymallet2776 4 місяці тому +91

    Finally,.internet gave us the possibility to listen poeple like you for first time in life. Having a lot of channel telling us the truth, finally. We can unified as Christians and grow together around the world of Jesus. I am bless to live that moment in my life🙏

    • @user-pf1tl6mz9r
      @user-pf1tl6mz9r 4 місяці тому +1

      Amen! We need more people to hear the truth as well!!

    • @ThisguySL
      @ThisguySL 4 місяці тому +5

      Channels like this tell you lies. Don't mince words.
      Also, "finally?" This channel in particular has been around for years.

    • @pomegranatepip2482
      @pomegranatepip2482 Місяць тому

      @@tonymallet2776 the internet also gives you the opportunity to find out about the real world. It’s even more interesting than this religion nonsense. You should try that. It’s more difficult to understand because it is not written by Stone Age goat herders.

    • @pomegranatepip2482
      @pomegranatepip2482 Місяць тому

      @@tonymallet2776 the internet also gives you the possibility to read up about real stuff.

    • @pomegranatepip2482
      @pomegranatepip2482 Місяць тому

      @@tonymallet2776 the internet also gives you the option to learn about reality. You should try.

  • @kennethgoin628
    @kennethgoin628 5 місяців тому +76

    I used to wonder if the dinosaurs stayed in Eden when Adam and Eve were exiled because it was hard for my head to accept the idea that the meat eaters wouldn't have destroyed such an easy quarry as humans. As I dug into the idea, I realized that idea didn't hold water. The thing that still confuses me is in the book of Job, where God speaks of Leviathan. He said that He kept a barrier between man and Leviathan because the two could not coexist. Therefore, I choose to believe that God removed Leviathan from us, and it may be that the dragons and other species have also been simply removed for the benefit of mankind.

    • @kennethgoin628
      @kennethgoin628 5 місяців тому

      @@keithmarlowe5569 I continuously find errors in modern science, and that's not a feat of theological or logical acrobatics. With all due respect, the same person you say knew nothing about creation wrote that we came from the dust, and the molecular composition of our skin is dust! How could that have been known? Seems a far reach for a fairy tale, which by the way, is an unsubstantiated claim created by secular, logistical acrobatics to support their Godless beliefs. If you take the science of authenticating ANY dated documents, which includes everything recorded before film and audio capabilities, if any of that process is correct, then the bible must also be correct, because it not only stands up to the same rigors of every embraced piece of human history, it dwarfs all of it in both numbers and consistency. Just because our minds do not comprehend many things written, it does not relegate it to a status of untruth. Furthermore, how ridiculous is it to propose that the thousands who died establishing the new church would do so for a fairy tale?
      There is a difference between disbelief and doubt. Disbelief doesn't care what the facts are. A disbeliever will choose anything but the way shown by any excuse possible. Doubting though, is a state of questioning while maintaining the hope of discovering a complete truth. The bible is still more complete, by far, than what post-modern era science is producing. It's like the video shows... someone comes up with it, substantiates it with credentials, and the disbelievers jump on the bandwagon. Scientists are constantly revamping the math because they too keep finding the errors. Do the history. Do some research of "what we knew" but has been updated... and updated... and updated. WE... are a limited existence, incapable of understanding things outside of our tangibles. Yet, the list of things we cannot explain never goes away. We explain one, and another comes in! The notion that such vastness of variety and complexity coming about on its own is becoming more and more absurd, but the desire to be Godless insists that these truths be beaten down. But why? What's the root of that? Common sense? Not hardly. The minute we find evidence to support God, which is immense, why do we always find ourselves pulling away from it? Mathematically, evolution is STILL impossible. By means of observation, it is STILL impossible. By common sense, evolution STILL makes no sense. I'll give you a simple assignment: Explain how sheep evolved. Seriously... explain sheep. They've been studied since the beginning of humanity and are still studied today. What we know is that without husbandry, without shelter or protection or a leader, they will die. They cannot defend themselves or even fend for themselves. So, how did they come to be? If humans took millions of years to develop to a state of intelligence to utilize sheep, how did the sheep survive waiting for the development of mankind? We know by authenticating ancient documents that sheep did not come after humans so... umm... where does that put us in secular, logistic acrobatics? The bible, scientifically authenticated, provides an explanation. So, then... logically, shouldn't we believe the bible's explanation? Mankind scores a 0 on this question, and it's one of thousands.
      What it all boils down to is that man does not believe he needs saving. In that denial he chooses his own path under the self-deception of over-inflated greatness. We've authenticated the bible, but none of man's fabrication has managed to equal it. Therefore, all we have left is ignorance. The few will stay the course, and the masses will laugh in their shame, all the way to destruction. You can embrace it or deny it. God forces no one. If you don't want to be a part of his family here, he won't make you be a part of the family there. I prefer to see belief as the more logical choice. If I'm right, I win! If I'm wrong, according to you and others of your conviction, I've lost nothing. So then, what have I to gain by joining the denial, even when there is a mountain of evidence AND PROOF (per the authentication process of all ancient writings) that God is truth? Understand, our greatest science is now telling us that all of our universe and beyond came from "nothing." Funny, the bible says the same thing! A fairy tale, as you call it, says the same thing. The only difference is that science says "poof"... it just "happened." Meanwhile, the bible demonstrates that God put himself into the nothingness and made all the nothing, "something." That's simple math my friend. Nothing + nothing = Nothing. Nothing + Something = Something! A building needs a builder. A painting needs a painter. Therefore, a creation needs a creator. We don't have to understand how it works, we just have to believe it does!

    • @JimOfTheJungle
      @JimOfTheJungle 5 місяців тому +10

      It's important to note that before the flood, everything on Earth was vegetarian. Well, I suppose there's a case to be made for ocean animals but as far as I understand Genesis, before the flood nothing and no one ate meat. So, based on that I think it's perfectly logical to assume that humans and all creatures lived together still.

    • @DakotaHighlander
      @DakotaHighlander 5 місяців тому +5

      Where in the leviathan section of Job does it say that God put a barrier between the creature and man?

    • @j.pershing2197
      @j.pershing2197 5 місяців тому

      Watch Symbols of an Alien Sky. Its not about aliens. Chk it out

    • @kennethgoin628
      @kennethgoin628 5 місяців тому +8

      @@JimOfTheJungle When God cursed the serpent and the ground and everything on the Earth, I'm thinking that's when everything changed.

  • @priceless1284
    @priceless1284 5 місяців тому +20

    When he said, " What do you think all the guys would do..?? Well.. the real guys" 😂

  • @GUNS_jk
    @GUNS_jk 17 днів тому +1

    Me and the boys at 3am: Yes this makes more sense than what was taught in Blue State public schools

  • @topshelfsoldier5534
    @topshelfsoldier5534 5 місяців тому +40

    Why do people worry about the concept of time so much? No one will ever understand it because no one will ever control time.

    • @67caveman
      @67caveman 5 місяців тому +3

      God does ,how do you explain how Jesus Christ was here and there at the same time ,🤔time travel ohhh yeah.

    • @topshelfsoldier5534
      @topshelfsoldier5534 5 місяців тому +7

      @@67caveman teleporting and omniscient are 2 different things

    • @67caveman
      @67caveman 5 місяців тому

      I know it sounded funny when I said it the first time I did it 😳😳😳😳 ,ooops I let my cat out of your bag .

    • @marks658
      @marks658 5 місяців тому +1

      What is a day to God, who is omnipresent?

    • @gregporter8600
      @gregporter8600 5 місяців тому +1

      Can't control weather either, but we understand it.

  • @DemocracyOfficerWood
    @DemocracyOfficerWood 2 місяці тому +32

    So youre telling me i only missed dinosaurs by that little time??!!

    • @evocativ
      @evocativ 2 місяці тому +8

      A couple thousands years… that’s not little

    • @kindaconey6422
      @kindaconey6422 2 місяці тому +5

      Still a lot closer then lots think

    • @evocativ
      @evocativ 2 місяці тому +2

      @@kindaconey6422 the Bible doesn’t even suggest a young earth

    • @thoneras9611
      @thoneras9611 2 місяці тому +2

      @@evocativ Million years, but yes. But actually, just look outside - see a bird? Here you go, a dinosaur.

    • @evocativ
      @evocativ 2 місяці тому +1

      @@thoneras9611 yep

  • @user-xg6nn2qs3f
    @user-xg6nn2qs3f 5 місяців тому +115

    I still think dragons existed.

    • @agapelife2179
      @agapelife2179 5 місяців тому +10

      I think they still do

    • @kosovalia
      @kosovalia 5 місяців тому +3

      Dragon exist in devil world , they r animals of devil world. Now what y have to know is from what r devils created ? ! Not from pure clay , not from water but from pure fire ( which looks like blue sometimes.

    • @subbasslines
      @subbasslines 5 місяців тому +6

      Komodo Dragon

    • @DividerLP
      @DividerLP 5 місяців тому +6

      @@kosovalia No. just no.

    • @kosovalia
      @kosovalia 5 місяців тому

      @@DividerLP... explore more about devil dimension , it isn't only human dimension. What have y seen in the dreams wasn't human dimension in fact it is another dimension same alike devil dimension . Devils r devil bc of their dark intentions toward humans... Christians do not mention what r devils ?! What origin they have who is their father. Father to humans is Adam and Father to devils also those other creature same created from pure fire but not devil with devil acts is Lucifer. Don't know why christians use this name bc in old testaments there is no such name , however I'm using it to clarify for whom I'm talking. Though , humans have their animals and also creatures created from pure fire have their animals in their dimension and one of these animals is dragon like birds to us but to them is more huge and wild. Also one part of devil have wings to fly.
      There r 3 types of creatures from pure fire
      1. With wings
      2. Who walks ( their speed is alike blinks of our eyes they don't need planes or boats like humans do !
      3 type who lives inside water or swim.
      As it is life in our dimension also to their dimension is life in air , sea and land

  • @WARLock1228
    @WARLock1228 5 днів тому

    You MUST write a children’s book that EXPLAINS this in easily digestible terms!

  • @BaldyManGaming
    @BaldyManGaming 4 місяці тому +111

    "Well, the REAL guys" is a low-key savage comment.
    Btw I really enjoyed this video and love this man's delivery.

    • @dark_natas_666
      @dark_natas_666 4 місяці тому +4

      You loved being lied to? That's a bit odd.

    • @robertdewindt862
      @robertdewindt862 4 місяці тому

      @valentinetarangojr.616 Have fun trying to work out your salvation without Jesus bud. You won’t have a leg to stand on come judgement day

    • @JoshuaTClark
      @JoshuaTClark 4 місяці тому +7

      @@dark_natas_666….I challenge you to point out one lie with concrete evidence. God’s Word will outlive you & all of your miserable descendants unless you repeat and call upon the name of Jesus.❤

    • @JoshuaTClark
      @JoshuaTClark 4 місяці тому +4

      Ya…that comment rubbed me the wrong way to. So I need to be a hunter/soldier in order to be a real man? I think not….Bible never recorded that Jesus hunted or served time in the military. Blessings 😀

    • @dark_natas_666
      @dark_natas_666 4 місяці тому

      @@JoshuaTClark "Miserable descendants." -Typical Christian hatred.

  • @TxRealtorSA
    @TxRealtorSA 5 місяців тому +99

    The Flood did not only consist of rain....read Genesis. "The fountains of the deep were opened". Huge water geysers released water into the mix!

    • @Mullins11B18
      @Mullins11B18 5 місяців тому +10

      He mentioned it.

    • @davidgardner863
      @davidgardner863 5 місяців тому +9

      And heated the oceans enough to kill everything in them. Oh, wait, that doesn’t quite work with the story, does it?

    • @HangrySaturn
      @HangrySaturn 5 місяців тому

      Ah yes, the deep. Tehom. Tiamat.

    • @razark9
      @razark9 5 місяців тому

      The global flood never happened and is purely imaginary.

    • @hopelessnerd6677
      @hopelessnerd6677 5 місяців тому

      And where did millions of cubic miles of water go? Is there a giant bung that got pulled? It's all gone. There's no evidence of it today. What about the civilizations that were happily living and making pottery and writing through the supposed "global" flood? There's simply no benefit to mankind from believing in that story.

  • @TGarmon84
    @TGarmon84 5 місяців тому +35

    Bombardier beetles are another example of an animal that uses a binary chemical reaction to produce quite the surprising effect.

    • @captivedesk3168
      @captivedesk3168 5 місяців тому +2

      Do beetles breathe fire? No

    • @TGarmon84
      @TGarmon84 5 місяців тому +5

      It's an example of possible similarities

    • @saltykraken9471
      @saltykraken9471 5 місяців тому +2

      @@TGarmon84 so you're just making shit up

    • @TGarmon84
      @TGarmon84 5 місяців тому

      Awesome argument there. You have no rebuttal, so you turn to insults.

    • @captivedesk3168
      @captivedesk3168 5 місяців тому

      @@TGarmon84 no it isnt

  • @scottross8623
    @scottross8623 3 години тому

    Back in the 90's i met an archeologist, he showed me his collection. In that collection he had petrified dinosaur footprint. Criss-crossing through the middle were a horse print, a camel print and a human footprint. Showing that at one time all 4 existed at the same time. Remeber the serpent that decieved Eve had legs, until it didn't.

  • @samschmit7181
    @samschmit7181 2 місяці тому +47

    At _this_ rate, I'm starting to think everything we know about dinosaurs is a lie.

    • @BaptistJoshua
      @BaptistJoshua 2 місяці тому +5

      We know from ancient paintings and rock art, that men hunted them, and rode on others.

    • @Jxwall88
      @Jxwall88 2 місяці тому +1

      @@BaptistJoshualies

    • @thoneras9611
      @thoneras9611 2 місяці тому

      There are a lot of very good scientific books out there, which can tell you more about dinosaurs.

    • @thoneras9611
      @thoneras9611 2 місяці тому +2

      @@BaptistJoshua No, we dont. But sure, lets assume for one moment humans were around at 100Mio B.C. to live together with dinosaurs. I am pretty confident, that it would have been the other way round - dinosaurs hunting human.

    • @BaptistJoshua
      @BaptistJoshua 2 місяці тому

      @@thoneras9611 No. Those "scientific books" use claims which have been proven false.

  • @poundtrader1414
    @poundtrader1414 5 місяців тому +96

    There is no possibility that complex chemicals (DNA, proteins, etc.) necessary for life can form at random. DNA is composed of hundreds of thousands of chemical base pairs all precisely sequenced. Even if such chemicals could form it is absurdly improbable that such chemicals once formed could then randomly come together to form a living one-celled organism. Even “simple” life forms are far too complex to form at random!

    • @TxRealtorSA
      @TxRealtorSA 5 місяців тому +15

      Question to Atheists, "From where did the simple chemicals originate?"

    • @jockyoung4491
      @jockyoung4491 5 місяців тому +2

      Nobody has claimed they did.

    • @therick363
      @therick363 5 місяців тому +6

      ⁠@@TxRealtorSAthat’s a question for scientists.
      However chemicals originated from atoms.

    • @poundtrader1414
      @poundtrader1414 5 місяців тому

      @@miscamisca6775
      The law of biogenesis as taught in biology class states that only life can produce life.
      one living thing needs another different living thing to survive, it's called a symbiotic relationship.
      How did life learn to reproduce itself? This is a question that evolutionists do not have an answer for.
      The scientific Law of biogenesis states: “life can only come from life”. Thereby, stating that as scientific fact life does not and cannot spontaneously generate despite evolution’s reliance on such events.
      Evolution requires the violation of this and many other scientific principles in order to somehow allow life to emerge serendipitously.

    • @poundtrader1414
      @poundtrader1414 5 місяців тому +8

      @@miscamisca6775
      Mutation - natural selection
      Here is how the imaginary part is supposed to happen: On rare occasions a mutation in DNA improves a creature's ability to survive, so it is more likely to reproduce (natural selection).
      That is evolution's only tool for making new creatures.
      It might even work if it took just one gene to make and control one part. But parts of living creatures are constructed of intricate components with connections that all need to be in place for the thing to work, controlled by many genes that have to act in the proper sequence.
      Natural selection would not choose parts that did not have all their components existing, in place, connected, and regulated because the parts would not work.
      Thus all the right mutations (and none of the destructive ones) must be present at the same time by pure chance. That is physically impossible.

  • @Aimeecinnamonsweets
    @Aimeecinnamonsweets 5 місяців тому +74

    I never knew crocs liked fruit ☺️

    • @user-rm2my8ew8h
      @user-rm2my8ew8h 5 місяців тому +2

      Me too...what heck.

    • @MelAtlNP
      @MelAtlNP 5 місяців тому +4

      Yea when there aren’t any puppies getting too close

    • @lettersquash
      @lettersquash 5 місяців тому +1

      Yeah, just be careful you don't hand feed them it.

    • @Anonymous-km5pj
      @Anonymous-km5pj 5 місяців тому +8

      i never bought crocs

    • @Silphwave
      @Silphwave 5 місяців тому

      They need nutrients only available in meat to survive. Their entire biology is designed specifically to hunt and digest animal flesh. No God would design a herbivore with the anatomy of an alligator or crocodile.

  • @timothy2896
    @timothy2896 17 днів тому +1

    This really made me think. Although when Jupiter was hit with meteors years back….it kinda defeats the flood argument.

  • @marcamerine137
    @marcamerine137 2 місяці тому +21

    That was freaking Awesome.!! I NEVER Heard It Explained Like that B4. Makes sense

    • @pomegranatepip2482
      @pomegranatepip2482 Місяць тому

      @@marcamerine137 if that makes sense you have a problem with critical reasoning.

    • @jesussandoval8756
      @jesussandoval8756 22 дні тому

      @@pomegranatepip2482ok awesome! Do you have tangible proof that this is all wrong?

  • @augustycizauzo6372
    @augustycizauzo6372 5 місяців тому +19

    What in the world, this honestly blew my mind. Not to be pretentious but I read a lot, I consider myself pretty intelligent, was an atheist in high school, and have a ton of life experience, and I just recently have found that Christianity is the deepest truth I have found. It comes naturally to some, I was not one of those people. But if you look deep enough, it just screams truth. The work now lies in following God 😬

    • @eeeaten
      @eeeaten 5 місяців тому

      sorry to hear it 😢

    • @ourfamilylucu
      @ourfamilylucu 4 місяці тому +1

      That's exciting! Keep reading the Bible and sharing your faith!

    • @eeeaten
      @eeeaten 4 місяці тому

      @@ourfamilylucu so crazy 😝

    • @XxDeathxX509
      @XxDeathxX509 Місяць тому

      That..sounds like backwards logic. Im actively TRYING to get into christianity but theres just so many..inconsistencies and contradictions..not to mention the people following it are..a bit tipsy when it comes to logic. But good for you brother 💪

    • @sarahgumball8597
      @sarahgumball8597 Місяць тому +1

      God bless u

  • @Mr_Green1017
    @Mr_Green1017 3 місяці тому +52

    I seen a pterodactyl when I was about 16 or 17 in the late 90s. It came down and flew about 10 or 15 feet above my head. It was brown with no feathers and it was huge! When I tell people they think I’m crazy or lying but I saw what I saw and I’ll never forget it

    • @TRACKERX73
      @TRACKERX73 3 місяці тому +10

      I believe you.
      I saw one in New Mexico. It was huge. Saw the shadow of the pterodactyl on the ground first, looking up expecting to see a small plane.
      Definitely had my full attention. I immediately climbed up into my truck. This thing could have carried me away never to be seen again.

    • @emmanuelsilvera8032
      @emmanuelsilvera8032 3 місяці тому +8

      Oh come on!

    • @Mr_Green1017
      @Mr_Green1017 3 місяці тому

      @@emmanuelsilvera8032 lol I don’t blame you for not believing me. But I saw what I saw that night and it will stay with me until I’m gone

    • @JohnBarnes-cimatron
      @JohnBarnes-cimatron 3 місяці тому +4

      Lots of dinosaur sitings around the world if you research it.

    • @robertlindlau8817
      @robertlindlau8817 3 місяці тому +2

      They are real . Contact Protect Animal Life , to give testimony.

  • @DevilsInBaggyPants1941
    @DevilsInBaggyPants1941 Місяць тому +2

    I'm really impressed and interested more in the Bible and evolution now, for sure.

  • @codycase7985
    @codycase7985 5 місяців тому +98

    This would make since on how the large stone structures were made. They used dinosaurs to move those stones around. And why the openings were so large

  • @user-nq8cq4re9w
    @user-nq8cq4re9w 3 місяці тому +7

    Another cool fact is there are several insects that actually create a type of light and even a beattle that sparks ...even a bumble bee can create a type of static electricity from it's body

  • @AMindInOverdrive
    @AMindInOverdrive 4 місяці тому +20

    I maintain that any 'scientist' who immediately discounts the possibility of God, without thoroughly considering it a possibility, is not a true scientist.
    Aren't they supposed to give consideration to ALL possibilities, so that they can honestly rule out the wrong ones and come to the correct conclusion?
    If that's the case, then a true scientist should give God's existence as much consideration as he/she gives evolution or any other possibility. Pandering to a pre-determined outcome is awfully bad scientific investigation IMO

    • @richardgregory3684
      @richardgregory3684 4 місяці тому +3

      _a true scientist should give God's existence as much consideration as he/she gives evolution or any other possibility_
      Evolution has evidence. "God" doesn;t.

    • @Daniel-lt1gy
      @Daniel-lt1gy 3 місяці тому

      @@richardgregory3684 according to science evolution doesn’t have any evidence, otherwise tell me when a pig will ever turn into a hawk or a monkey into a man? They will go extinct long before that and I doubt that there’s an evolutionist that actually expects to see such as an evolution ever happen “again”.
      As for God, look around you, the sky, the earth, how intricately formed nature is and even man itself speaks to existence of a creator, the more you study real science the more you will realize that according to science all these things can’t have been formed by accident which is the prevailing theory.
      Even the Bible, lets take a single book of the Bible, the book of Daniel, the prophecies within it are so accurate over such a long span of time that the atheistic scholars can only say that it’s not possible for that book to have been written during the prophets life time yet they have no evidence to support their claims other than if it was true then it could only be due to God himself so it can’t be true.

    • @erikt1713
      @erikt1713 3 місяці тому

      A scientist should start from observations. They make up explanations and hypotheses which is a creative process, but they must then again be tested by experiments.
      A scientist is not called to make up supernatural beings like God who can never be observed and play no role in this world.

    • @erikt1713
      @erikt1713 3 місяці тому

      @josephmartin5483 This is speculation they can engage in outside of their scientific activity. It is not possible to observe the "first cause" of the universe. A mind who must have all the answers might call this first principle "God". However, if they then start talking to the first cause of the universe and asking it to forgive their sins then they've left the path of reason.
      Better to be humble and accept that the first cause of the universe is not possible for us to know.

    • @erikt1713
      @erikt1713 3 місяці тому

      @josephmartin5483 I had never heard about this book, but it appears to be pseudoscience. None of the effects claimed by Mr Emoto is backed up with scientific experiments and his publication has not been peer reviewed. It would be a waste of time to read this book.
      At least the Bible is great literature with gripping stories like that of Samson and Delilah 😉.

  • @emzee586
    @emzee586 23 дні тому +1

    Roger Goodell not only explains what a catch is. Explains the Bible well too.

  • @TestingGeepay-zh6sz
    @TestingGeepay-zh6sz 4 місяці тому +44

    Can't tell how much I loved this video.. I'm a Christian and a young scientist obsessed with things concerning the Universe 'n the word of God.
    Ofc, the Bible 'n science blend but some organic minds can't just fathom.
    We exist in time, and as it progresses there's bound to be changes.. the main thing is, let's pass the truth down to coming generations till that final day..
    I'll keep reading 'n making extensive researches with guidelines from the Bible.
    Thanks a lot 'n see you in the Future sir!

    • @dumyjobby
      @dumyjobby 3 місяці тому

      To fit the bible narrative and make it make sense it will eventually wear you out, i left religion since everything it said it proved to be wrong. Guy claims humans and dinosaur lived together, it's undisputed that isn't true

    • @igotwect3174
      @igotwect3174 3 місяці тому

      if you research carbon dating, evolution and actual science you’ll change your mind

    • @joeydutton8074
      @joeydutton8074 3 місяці тому

      If you're a Christian and/or scientist, and you believe this Young Earth false religion,... then you need to be ashamed of yourself.

    • @theitguy2731
      @theitguy2731 3 місяці тому

      @@dumyjobby The biblical text is the most verified historical document to ever be written. I highly doubt you could make it through both volumes of "Evidence that Demands a Verdict". You'll quit real quick once you start to realize that scientists have been trying to disprove the bible, only to look foolish. Once you realize that your lover only invites people that agree with them to the party, you'll realize your lover is just propaganda.

  • @cyrilnorrie8450
    @cyrilnorrie8450 5 місяців тому +9

    This is an excellent explanation of how things could have gone over time.

  • @kevin_ramirez2529
    @kevin_ramirez2529 5 місяців тому +28

    Also mention I read that a great flood has been talked about in other various cultures.

    • @dark_natas_666
      @dark_natas_666 4 місяці тому +4

      How could other cultures talk about a great flood when they all died???

    • @wasbruder656
      @wasbruder656 4 місяці тому +3

      @@dark_natas_666There was only one culture before the ark cultures were created at the tower of babel where good gave all the peopel other languages

    • @dark_natas_666
      @dark_natas_666 4 місяці тому

      @@wasbruder656 Then they just sailed away on unchartered seas to all corners of the world to be Native Americans, Eskimos, Aboriginals in Australia, etc., right? Please biblically explain that.

    • @dark_natas_666
      @dark_natas_666 4 місяці тому +1

      @@wasbruder656 "One culture theory," are you suggesting everyone from one inbreed family spawned a few million people in the span of a couple of hundred years?

    • @FBI_Agent_69420
      @FBI_Agent_69420 4 місяці тому

      @@dark_natas_666 well what else are they going to do besides bang their siblings all day long? It's not like they had Nintendo back then.

  • @mactek6033
    @mactek6033 8 днів тому +1

    The Bible has to be taken literally, except for the metaphorical parts.

  • @ALTheFreeMan
    @ALTheFreeMan 5 місяців тому +12

    Has no one ever thought that maybe we’ve been lied to about dinosaurs roaming the Earth billions of years ago??

    • @fourleaf8055
      @fourleaf8055 5 місяців тому +3

      This. I haven’t believed in dinosaurs for a couple years because it didn’t fit my view of what the Bible was saying. Now this is coming out that possibly dinosaurs walked with humans that I have never considered possible

    • @ALTheFreeMan
      @ALTheFreeMan 5 місяців тому +3

      @@fourleaf8055 Right. I think part of this Christian walk is questioning and unlearning the lies we’ve been told throughout our lives.

    • @eeeaten
      @eeeaten 5 місяців тому

      dinosaurs are science fact. they almost all died 66 million years ago.

    • @ShadowQuik
      @ShadowQuik 4 місяці тому +2

      ⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠@@ALTheFreeManthat’s 100% me. And I just got saved 16 months ago, so I had like 25 years worth of beliefs to undo lol

    • @Fyrnweorc880
      @Fyrnweorc880 4 місяці тому

      It's not billions, the earth itself is only 4 billion years old. They roamed 65 million years ago, which many scientist over many years discovered. You can look it up and find many reputable sources online but because I bet you wouldn't trust them maybe you should consider carbon dating some fossils yourself if actually believe you've been lied to.

  • @NicholasMGlasson
    @NicholasMGlasson 5 місяців тому +30

    At the end he is spot on. Who controls funding for the curriculum. Who controls the contents? Who vets the type of candidates for the jobs as a result? So is the internet a tree of knowledge? And are we decimating its fruits?

    • @leeskillman4249
      @leeskillman4249 5 місяців тому

      That why all the crap started when Rockefeller took over education & health.
      Pure evil .
      👿👿👿👿👿👿👿👿👿👿👿

    • @roystewart4826
      @roystewart4826 5 місяців тому +1

      Nit tree of knowledge just a picture guide of absolute guesswork ! The more you know the less knowledge you have ! The truth won’t ever be told just what they want you to believe !

    • @orlandooracle7008
      @orlandooracle7008 Місяць тому

      The Rockefellers implemented the school system into our country and had laws passed to make it mandatory. They have the kind of money that can buy political decisions.

    • @orlandooracle7008
      @orlandooracle7008 Місяць тому

      Had he not brought it up I was going to say, that the megalithic structures at Gobekli Tepe show stone carvings of dinosaurs.

  • @gecko-saurus
    @gecko-saurus 5 місяців тому +50

    I think your underestimating how short 4000 years is.

    • @marniekilbourne608
      @marniekilbourne608 5 місяців тому

      In the scheme of the age of this planet, yes 4,000 years is nothing! Nevermind that the text of the Bible was only written just over 1,000 years ago and then highly edited over the years by MAN. Yes, let's not use the brains that the higher power whatever you call it gave us and let's only believe what MEN wrote and cobbled together as the Bible. WHICH VERSION of the BIBLE? There are many! What about everyone else on this earth living now and that have lived that are not or were not Christian. There are also many denominations of Christian! Which one is the ONLY one going to heaven?! I think our higher power is likely ashamed at the stupidity of some of the people "he" created. Everyone is welcome in "his" house it says. EVERYONE means just that. We need to have a much less literal view of spirituality and a more broad and encompassing one. Other cultures have different words for different things and most of the religious texts in existence now have very similar stories. I hardly think that means nothing. Christianity is also very young in terms of religions. So, to think everyone pre-Christian and who is not Christian (again which Christians?) today is hell bound is just hateful and insane. I am a confirmed United Methodist but we also studied other religions in Sunday School my senior year. I hardly think that ONLY United Methodists are going to heaven. What I do know for a fact is that religions have caused and still cause war, death, murder, division and hatred among the people on this Earth and always have! It is NOT all Good! No God would want that to be happening. That God is likely NOT happy that people are being and have been so utterly stupid and that some of those people can't use their brains to have common sense and to think for themselves. To be more rational and intelligent. To be more inclusive and understanding of all the people living now and who have lived. That seems like the "Christian" thing to do!

    • @sethhendrikz6949
      @sethhendrikz6949 5 місяців тому +8

      4000 years when one person lived to 900 odd years is actually quite short…

    • @theIastgeneration
      @theIastgeneration 5 місяців тому

      @@sethhendrikz6949 and for HIM a day in heaven is like 1000 years on earth
      so when YESHUA said he will come soon (2000 years later aka 6000 years in sum) HE will be here soon and very soon

    • @kingnothing2161
      @kingnothing2161 5 місяців тому +6

      ​@RandySeverino everything God speaks into creation was mature, with instruction to reproduce. Adam, the animals, the plants. Our universe has an artifical maturity, or appearance of age which makes total sense. How was man supposed to subdue a brand new creation if there weren't pre-set patterns and systems in place?

    • @liandrah_j
      @liandrah_j 5 місяців тому +2

      Remember we don't know how long Adam and Eve lived in that garden

  • @brad144k
    @brad144k 22 дні тому +2

    The ''T-Rex'' had wings....
    🐉

  • @sparrowt4082
    @sparrowt4082 4 місяці тому +59

    I remember someone talking about the belief that dinosaurs are just reptiles that have lived a long time, like in the days of Noah. Where people lived a long time, so did the animals -- and lizards, don't stop growing the older they age.
    Also the cartilage in our foreheads dont stop growing, meaning someone who lived for a long time, could have that "neanderthal man" look with the protruding forehead, because the cartilage there does not stop growing, it gets bigger, the older you age.
    I found that very interesting.

    • @dark_natas_666
      @dark_natas_666 4 місяці тому +13

      That someone who told you all that was, as we say in educated terms, "An idiot."

    • @Wheel_Horse
      @Wheel_Horse 4 місяці тому +8

      @@dark_natas_666 Yup. And never mind the fact that there is no "carilage" to speak of in one's forehead. The NOSE, yes... forehead... ummmm... no.

    • @dark_natas_666
      @dark_natas_666 4 місяці тому +2

      @@Wheel_Horse This guy who is teaching this is a blatant liar. I'm shocked by how people just go along with it. Even if I was stoned out of my mind, I would still say, "This is wrong."

    • @Wheel_Horse
      @Wheel_Horse 4 місяці тому +2

      @@dark_natas_666 "people just go along with it" === Not people, SHEEPLE ! So few are capable of logical critical thinking these days. Pretty sad...

    • @dark_natas_666
      @dark_natas_666 4 місяці тому

      @Wheel_Horse I could get a lobotomy and still have enough awareness to know this is bs..

  • @andylin8388
    @andylin8388 5 місяців тому +21

    But if the dinosaurs were included on the ark, where are they today?

    • @RealSekiroGamerz
      @RealSekiroGamerz 5 місяців тому +4

      Evolution

    • @FishDino1310
      @FishDino1310 5 місяців тому +8

      @@RealSekiroGamerzoh so I thought we were trying to deny evolution ☠️

    • @RealSekiroGamerz
      @RealSekiroGamerz 5 місяців тому +3

      @@FishDino1310 overtime animal must adapt to new environment and who knows how the world would have changed after the great flood

    • @ushiekelvin8401
      @ushiekelvin8401 5 місяців тому +1

      I think they are now kangaroos

    • @Ilovejesus100percent
      @Ilovejesus100percent 5 місяців тому +8

      Did you even watch the whole video?

  • @johnjordan3815
    @johnjordan3815 5 місяців тому +116

    Great video! What if alligators had gone extinct? Would we consider those dinosaurs? What about Komodo dragons? Anacondas? I think dinosaurs might still be alive today. The big, extinct ones get all the attention to support an evolutionary theory.

    • @jockyoung4491
      @jockyoung4491 5 місяців тому +13

      No, none of those animals are descended from dinosaurs. Only birds are. This can be shown by careful examination of their anatomy and the fossil record.

    • @lahoku
      @lahoku 5 місяців тому +28

      @@jockyoung4491there is no evidence for scales turning into feathers.
      Again, drawings also pictured to support unverifiable claims & evidence.

    • @joshuakohlmann9731
      @joshuakohlmann9731 5 місяців тому +3

      Yes, just like the objects that fall downwards rather than sideways get all the attention to support the theory of gravity.

    • @jockyoung4491
      @jockyoung4491 5 місяців тому +6

      @@lahoku
      Not directly, perhaps, but since birds descended from reptiles, where else would feathers have come from? And yes it HAS been shown how it could have been done genetically. If the feathered dinosaurs are not enough evidence in themselves.

    • @mojebi3804
      @mojebi3804 5 місяців тому +24

      "Since birds descended from reptiles..." except they didn't.

  • @oneheadlight8000
    @oneheadlight8000 Місяць тому +3

    So the argument against the meteor strike is that mammals survived and reptiles didn’t?

    • @alantasman8273
      @alantasman8273 Місяць тому

      Dinosaurs live much more recently and were contemporaries of man...Soft dinosaur tissue, now found at dig site on six continents attests to this fact.