This is a great series with a ton of information. As someone who lives in the Azores, I welcome you and hope to see you when you investigate the site off our shores.
I have been doing a lot of the investigation that you have clearly done on my own. Everything that you have said is nearly spot on with all of the reasonable suppositions that you can make with the available information. The timeline you are working on is almost unimportant compared to the overall narrative you have come up with. Keep up the good work!
Apologies for the double comment, but now that I've had a chance to watch the full video I just wanted to come back and give a more detailed response. Prior to this video I must say that I had more or less written off the Richat Structure in my mind as a potential location for Atlantis, due to it being a natural structure. However, I had never considered what you proposed, which is that a group of nomads in that region stumbled upon it, and took advantage of the protection it offered, which opened an opportunity up to them to advance their understanding of the world much faster than their peer groups around the world due to not having to worry about predators, and using the structure as inspiration for their new home once it was time to move on. So the Richat Structure was NOT Atlantis, but it did INSPIRE Atlantis. This all makes perfect sense. It really does. It answers all the primary questions. WHO the people were that initially populated the island, WHERE they came from, WHY they wound up going there in the first place, WHEN the migrated, and HOW they became more advanced than their peers. I was trying to find holes in your theory, but I simply cannot, other than that I'm not sure I buy that Bimini ever factored into things, but that's secondary. In anycase, thanks again for putting in the work and advancing all our collective knowledge!
Perhaps you're right about Bimini, this timeline is just a speculative model for now, I'm open to changing it as new evidence arises. At this point I want to explore the underwater site in the Azores before I revisit the timeline, I'm either right and more time needs to be spent trying to understand the true timeline, or I'm wrong - the site could just be an interesting geological anomaly and the whole timeline gets scrapped. Thanks for watching and taking the time to put together such a great comment. Cheers.
Great video. You deserve more subs. Best evidence for the location of Atlantis I have seen yet. Randall had already convinced me it was in the Azores and now I'm more certain. Keep the videos coming!
Dude, im just 10 minutes in to the video and so far this has been the most fantastic shit on Atlantis i''ve come across....i hope you are writing a book on this...if so TAKE MY MONEY NOW!
Excellent video, well put together with quality geodetic info - the either the greatest coincidence in history or you have found the thread linking us to the ancient past. I hope Randal, Graham, Howard Crowhurst or the brothers of the serpent finds this information and has a good delve into your ideas.
Thanks, but it's a very niche subject, I don't expect a lot of people to take me seriously. It's up to me to find a way to survey the site in the Azores in more detail.
Man, this is the most concise and plausible timeline I've ever listened to. It follows my same train of logic, as well as adding in a bunch of "ah-hah" possibilities. (Such as the Richat structure being an earlier inhabited [& probably inspiration], for the Island civilization that followed). Thank you for all of your time and research into this, hope to meet someday. Cheers, from FL.
It’s been a joy to follow along these videos. I think you really have put in a great deal of focused, empiric work and are potentially onto something big here. As compelling as this proposed timeline is, however, I’m afraid it will remain simply interesting until irrefutable evidence is found. Irrefutable evidence won’t be found unless it is searched for. That is the hurdle - getting enough resources, interest, funding, and coordination to actualize an undersea exploration of the Azores plateau. I only wish I knew how to make that happen.
37:00 your suspicion that solar activity is linked to these phenomena is spot-on, imo. It is derided by the 'mainstream' physics community but as an engineer myself, the "Electric Universe" model proposed by electrical/plasma engineers over on the Thunderbolts channel makes much more practical sense to me than the gravity-only model of mainstream cosmology. It is something you might want to check out. Not just solar flairs but also comets and rogue planets (Venus is thought to be one even by academia) which are at a different electrical potential to the earth (because they originate from outside our helioshere) would discharge MASSIVE arcs, plasma-machining the surface, as it achieves electrical equilibrium with our local electrical environment. As such...it has always stuck me how mountain chains and the streams coming off them look like lightening bolts with fine streamers fanning from the main arc. Water cuts through the weakest rock...so were minerals arranged along electrical discharge paths so that they will be the most erodeable paths for runoff water to cut permanent channels into? Deeply appreciate your channel. -John
I've been on the creation path for some time now, I can concur that all myths have the same common thread of creation. I believe the hunter gatherers were the survivors of the first flood 12,000 BCE. These were the story bearers so who knows how convoluted the story has become. You have spent a huge amount of time and energy on this presentation. Well done and thanks for the upload. ENKI ENLIL = Yahweh Yeshua = SETH HORUS etc, all with the winged disc AN or RA. The tree of life comes up in every culture, and the pillars of djed basalt 8 sided pillars like the giants causeway in Ireland have a huge bearing on the design of Atlantis Hy Brasil etc.
I'm glad to have found your channel. Each video is captivating AND educational. Best for last, something in each one 🤯 blows my mind with the reasonableness and unexpected connections that so simply & directly explains these mysteries. Good to see someone who doesn't resort to dramatizing and exaggeration discuss these topics. ♥ 🙏🏻 John
An absolute travesty that you haven't gotten more attention. This is incredibly detailed and informative. You easily equal Randal Carlson in information.
Very kind of you, but it's difficult to get anyone's attention if you're trying to come up with plausible explanations. A lot of people are interested in the idea of an ancient civilisation that was technologically superior to our own, I'm just not seeing that, I think this was all done by hunter gatherers, or possibly a very early agricultural society. It's gotten to the point where the whole "Atlantis" subject now has it's own sci-fi lore developed by self proclaimed psychics, unless you link Atlantis to Aliens or a lost spacefaring human civilisation, most people aren't interested. To me, I think it's more impressive if the world was explored and mapped by a group of people from the Palaeolithic/Neolithic. What I'm doing is well within the realms of speculation, but I think I've developed something worthy of further investigation. It's a shame that serious researchers such as the Heath brothers or Howard Crowhurst aren't getting the recognition that they deserve, after many, many years of research. I knew full well when I started this channel that it wouldn't be hugely popular, I'm surprised that I've got this many subscribers to be honest. I really do appreciate the kind comments from yourself and other viewers and I'm happy that there are people enjoying my videos.
@Apocalypse I don't know why, but I always imagined the Atlanteans as having technology roughly equivalent to the Greeks or Romans, maybe even the early 18th or 19th centuries, while living in an age of hunter gatherers. Big ships, advanced navigation, and a society built on trade, with maybe the very early beginnings of what we would consider "modern" technology, like gears, primitive batteries, steam locomotion, or even toying with electricity and lightbulbs...but no nukes or magic crystals lol...and they weren't the only civilization, simply the most advanced and wide-reaching, and they were just utterly destroyed by a worldwide cataclysm, which if the research is correct, was caused by a comet impact. Maybe their astronomers could see the comet coming and knew what would happened, and tried to save their culture somehow.
@@Earthwise. What is the distance between the Atlantis Prime Meridian and Greenwich Mean Time? I have a suspicion that it it has a lot to do with Freemason Sacred numbers.
I'd really like it if you keep doing videos about your research into the azores, and anything else relevant to this topic. Wish there was funds to have robotic submersibles sent down into the Atlantic in the area you propose to be Atlantis. I'd be really curious to see what's down there.
I've got some other videos I want to make first, but I'm sure I'll re-visit the Azores topic. I'm sure I'll find a way to explore the site, it will just take some patience.
Giuseppe Katapano: "Atlantida which disappeared 12,000 years ago, was the land of the Illyrians (Pelasgians), who escaped the flood of Atlantis and began new civilizations on all continents, especially in Europe, Africa and Small Asia small". THOTH spoke Albanian!
I’ve enjoyed this series very much.. I congratulated you on a very viable location and truly believe it needs to be explored as soon as possibly.. since watching this I’ve been exploring under water submersibles :) I would suggest a kick starter for private funding.
Thanks for watching. I'll certainly be looking into the crowdfunding aspect once I grow the channel a little more. Looking at prices, it would probably be cheaper to build my own ROV and boat than it would be to hire them.
@@MatApocalypse I am a motorsport fabricator based in Bristol, my work can be found at @kam-fab Please contact me in future if you need any help on this project moving forward. Kind regards Harry
If you started a GoFundMe, I promise I'd contribute! There are enough people following Jimmy on Bright Insight and Randall Carlson and Graham Hancock who I believe would be happy to help fund this endeavor.
38:00 the serpent has also been proposed as electricity - as an arc "snaking" through a medium. The comet you mentioned could have discharged arcs to the surface of the earth during a very near miss rather than smashing into the earth...thus the dragon or snake motif indicateds a comet but indirectly associated with a the arcs arising from a comet's near miss. Sharing your thoughts is welcome and encouraged. 🙂
It's south of the Equator, so it's not possible to fit Gunung Padang into my Northern Hemisphere observatory network. It's latitude is interesting at 7° south of the Equator. The Northern Hemisphere observatories are separated by latitudes that are 1/7 of the distance from the Equator to the North Pole. 1/7 of 90° means that these latitudinal intervals sit 12.85714° north or south from each other. 90° / 7° gives us the opposite relationship, Gunung Padang sits 1/12.85714 south of the Equator. Perhaps Gunung Padang serves a similar purpose to the observatories in the Northern Hemisphere. This doesn't mean that it was built by the same people, it could be that a different group of people at a different time had a similar grasp of geometry and were trying to perform the same task of measuring the size of the planet. It also could just be a coincidence. I have no idea how old Gunung Padang is, I would like to see Danny Hilman Natawidjaja publish his findings in a peer reviewed paper.
@@MatApocalypse Thanks for the thorough response! I agree that GP could easily be the work of a separate group. It is interesting that they also used basalt columns, but I suppose it would be the perfect building material for any early people once they started dabbling in stone structures. I like your idea of the richat structure being abandoned due to climate change. I thought its destruction could be tied the the YD impact theory, but it sounds like it was earlier. I think it makes sense that they would have left If the conditions became unsuitable. Fantastic video and theory. Thanks amigo!
The Pyramids on the azores i believe is coverings something same as the one's on the cabary islands they look like structure that are covering or hiding something important.
I believe the canal that was built to connect to the inland sea from the "southern gate" of the city was orientated along the tilt of the Earth. Aligned with the temple observatory at the center of the city..
I just don't see any evidence for this right now. We can even name the architect (Hemiunu) who designed the Great Pyramid. That's not to say it wasn't built over something much older.
The tragic thing with fictional histories is, that the more detail one adds, the less likely they become overall. Still I agree, that the whole (speculative) story needs telling and creatively reconstructing, as the main pillars / motifs / memes are so suggestive.
True, I don't think I'm right about everything, just trying to put together the best picture as I see it with the limited information that we have. Great comment thanks.
Thank you so much for putting in the effort and time to make all this. This is one of the best video essay series I've seen! The evidence pointing to a possible Atlantic civilization is very convincing, but I disagree with your proposed timeline. I don't think the the Atlantians came out of southern Africa. 1. With the proliferation of sub-saharan peoples throughout the Atlantic coasts wouldn't there be genetic remnants of resistances to certain diseases like malaria? 2. I recently watched Carlson's Halloween video essay and he mentions how Halliburton found cultural similarities of diverse peoples from all over the world that have similar observances of the taurid meteor stream. From Europeans, to Japanese, to Australian natives, to Peruvians. No mention of African peoples though. 3. Carlson hypothesizes that what we call the gulf stream went around the Azores plateau, going south on the east side. Wouldn't this impede the travel of people going northwest from Africa? Just some thoughts. Thank you for putting this info out there.
Thank you for your kind words and for taking the time to put together your comment. I think it's unlikely that I'm correct about everything in my timeline, I'm more confident about the timing and placement of Atlantis and the observatories than I am about the origins of these people. With regards to your three points: 1. If there weren't many Atlantean survivors, perhaps any genetic resistance to malaria gets watered down over time by breeding with people who have no resistance. If there were a significant number of Atlantean survivors, how many generations before genetic resistance is lost? If the survivors settled in regions free of Malaria, then these genes might not be selected for by potential mates, sickle cell disease for example, might make it tough to survive and pass on your genes, and there's always natural genetic mutation. However, it's a good point and worthy of further exploration. 2. I haven't done enough research about ancient African mythology, it's something I'm working on and there are certainly a number of flood myths that parallel those that are found outside of Africa. If the Taurids played some role in the destruction of Atlantis it would certainly make sense to weave them into your traditions, but if the Atlantean survivors decided not to settle in sub-Saharan Africa after the island sank, then there would be no trace of these traditions found in sub-Saharan Africa today. It doesn't mean that they weren't from sub-Saharan Africa originally. 3. This is a good point, it really depends upon the type of sails these people were using. My stance is that the early exploration of the Atlantic was performed by hunter gatherers (maybe with some early animal husbandry), using fairly primitive vessels, I'm thinking along the lines of large hollowed out logs with outriggers, possibly sealed with tree resin mixed with charcoal for extra protection from the water. These primitive vessels wouldn't have been able to accommodate the sort of sails that you would find on modern European vessels. They would more likely be equipped with the kind of sails that you would find on a Junk Rig. These junk sails don't allow for the same kind of speeds or efficiencies that can be obtained from modern European sails, but they're easier to operate, require less man power and more importantly allow you to sail into the wind with relative ease. If these early seafarers had junk sails or something similar, they wouldn't have been at the mercy of ocean currents (ocean currents would certainly allow for faster travel once they were mapped out). To me, the logical way to explore the ocean without the aid of modern navigational equipment is to choose a fixed latitude and stick with it until you've found something. I'm still 50/50 on whether or not these people originated in sub-Saharan Africa, maybe they came down to the Richat through the Middle-East? Maybe it was the meeting of two different cultures? If people from Europe / the Middle-East met up with people from sub-Saharan Africa, they may have combined their astronomical knowledge and came up with some significant epiphanies. The Atlanteans could have originated from anywhere, I'm just speculating based on the information that we have so far (Mousterian Pluvial / Dates for Sea Level / Dates for observatory placement etc...), but this is all subject to change as new information comes to light. Thanks for taking the time to comment.
hey, have you recently checked out ben van kerkwyk? he is from the uncharted x channel i dont follow him myself too much but he has brought up some things of ancient advanced machining something which i notice you either avoid or maybe dont know about. but something that struck me was he mentions these scoop marks cut out granite and they have pre dyanistic paintings on them.
I have, he puts out some great content and goes out into the field a heck of a lot. I will explain my opinions on ancient machining in a later video at some point. I'm afraid I don't agree with Ben though. My background is in engineering and I can see a number of relatively simple ways to accomplish what has been attributed to ancient machining. I do believe that various wooden forms and jigs were used to align and guide ancient hand tools to achieve some quite impressive workmanship (I have drawings and CAD renders of my ideas ready to make a future video). I often see Ben getting surface roughness mixed up with flatness, these are two completely different properties. I'm also not sure he understands the limitations of non-contact measuring equipment; when using this kind of equipment you often have to factor in ADC error amongst other variables. I've spoken with people who work in metrology who have taken issue with some of his claims. If you're wondering how large rocks can be moved with relative ease, look into the work of Wally Wallington, a retired construction worker who can move gigantic stone structures by himself with no machinery required, just a lifetime of practical experience, it's easy to see how Wally's techniques could be scaled up to move larger structures using more people or even animal power. I'm really not trying to rail on Ben, I still watch his channel and enjoy his videos, I think his understanding of metrology is getting better, but I would say he has too much focus on ancient machining, there are definitely other solutions that might require a little more hard work that end up with the same result. It's my opinion that we may have severely underestimated what our ancestors could do without the luxuries of our modern technology, even so far back as our hunter gatherer ancestors. I think a lot of skills and trades have been lost over the millennia, even in recent times with the modern industrial phenomenon of having a job as opposed to a skill or trade.
@@MatApocalypse but what about holes being drilled into different granite materials in Egypt? Just saw a video on it last night, where the gentleman described that the different stone has a hardness of 8 on the moh scale, and that only within the past 100ish years we've been able to utilize the power of diamonds to make cutting and drilling these hard materials possible. Anyways, great video series you have. I also wonder, your proposed site of Atlantis, is it in international waters? Is it difficult to be able to even reach the site with basic scuba diving? Or is it a lot farther down? It sounds like if you can get Elon Musk's attention, maybe you can convince him that it's worth investigating further. He was, after all, interested in Egypt recently. I'm also willing to bet that the pillars in Egypt that depict atlantis (that you mentioned in one video) are either in the Labyrinth, or sealed away below the Sphinx (see info on the original Sphinx's shape and name being Hemit... references to library/ archive). Have you seen the video on where they have found the Labyrinth back in 2008, and kept it hush-hush until just recently? I wonder if that ties in with any of the 7 latitude lines... Plato also visited the Labyrinth, if I'm not mistaken. I know I'm off on a tangent and pretty vague, but Egypt and Atlantis are 2 major pieces of the same puzzle, and it seems like the Egyptian authorities/ Egyptologists know a lot more than they let on, as they have controlled the narrative for the sake of tourism and dismissed all scientific evidence and research they do not like to hear that questions their timeline of the pyramids and their construction.
Ok so the Adam and Eve story is in the Richat and they are banished by an angel with a sword of fire (possible the sun being too hot). They move to Azores and there the Noah story happens?
Great info, I really enjoyed your video but I think you could’ve elaborated on the possible diffusion of culture from that island. It’s possible when acknowledging how most temples and other monolithic sites were built upon even older sites that use bigger stones and are made using considerably more advanced construction methods due to the precision of the design, such as at machu pichu, baalbek temple, the barabar caves and other similar places around the world. I think it might be possible that all those people from “Atlantis” or whatever the island could’ve been called might have advanced considerably due to the time and ideal conditions they had to do so and maybe predominantly in their construction methods, metallurgy, stone masonry, and without a doubt the ability to farm and collect livestock. It’s interesting to consider the azores are known for their cows and cheese production..
Interesting, what is most compelling to me in regards to Atlantis is essentially the power of the gulf stream, it is why the weather in the UK is so damn consistent because we are fed with the sweet warming waters of the gulf stream that helps regulate the climate. This is exactly what the Azores would have benefitted from throughout the ice age, it would have been the most optimally inhabitable place possibly on the planet due to this particular benefit.
@Apocalypse_Tube I feel in my DNA that you are on to something enormous , profound, and paradigm shifting. How can we support your work? I would welcome the opportunity to interview you someday. I have so many questions.
@@rebeccasimmers9363 I definitely think I'm on to something, how much of it I've got right is another question. If you want to support my work just keep watching my videos, like (or dislike), subscribe and leave a comment. If you have any questions, you can always send me an email (you can find my correspondence email if you click on my channel ).
About 100 thousand years the great flood happened. The ancient ancients went back to primitive, survived in caves, wrote on walls, eventually to go full circle once again, Atlantis, ancient Egypt, ancient Athens. They fall. We are probably 90 thousand years til the next event. We essentially become so technologically advanced and eventually it’s like the world strikes back.
the serpent attacking the roots of the tree of life could be a massive tsunami in the picture it shows a snake in a circle pattern around the island at 38:39
I've tried to put a timeline together as best as I can with the information that I have. Maybe I'm wrong about people inhabiting the Richat structure, but it is geometrically linked to Avebury and Atlantis in a way that allows certain astronomical measurements to be made with simplified calculations.
@@commonsense-og1gz These buildings are almost certainly abandoned forts built by the French Foreign Legion. Lots of them have the foundations of corner towers, which were common features in French desert forts.
Thanks for your kind comments. There seems to be two different view points on alternate history: 1. The story told to us by academics is mostly true. OR 2. There was an advanced civilisation in the past that had telekinetic powers and advanced technology. I'm coming from a different place, suggesting that stone-age people with stone-age technology were capable of measuring, charting and navigating the globe. It's very difficult for my ideas to gain traction when Option 1 is taken as gospel by most people and Option 2 is much more exciting than anything I can come up with. I suspect I will be vindicated over time. It seems to be mostly engineers and people who are good at math that see things my way. Thanks for watching.
I would challenge you to look at Atlantis as both a continent as well as a city, the island was what was left after the Continental mass separated the island was once the Capitol city of the continent with land upwards of 2000 ft above sea level and lowlands at or mildly below sea level depending on when you found yourself there the highlands had different names by those who lived there and those who visited but the lowlands only had one name Lemuria.
In ancient times, Geodesy was the science of measuring and representing the geometry of the Earth (measuring the size and shape of the Earth and it's orientation relative to the orbital plane around the sun). In more modern times, Geodesy also includes the measurement and representation of gravity (gravity varies ever so slightly depending where you are located on Earth).
The sunken capital city of Atlantis is due West of the Straits, and due South of Terceira Island. The plain of Atlantis is due West and Southward of that point. The plain is 3500 meters underwater.
@@MatApocalypse take a look at my video "Atlantis (2 miles down)" , feel free to silence the audio if you wish. You will see a still image with the most accurate bathemetry image of Atlantis available, with latitude and longitude . The Great Plain of Atlantis is apparent in the South East quadrant. It is referred to as the Azore Plain.
Also I found interesting the Baask and Berber people being decendants of Cro-Magnon interesting considering Cro-Magnon blood is also known as blue blood, royal blood, alien blood, Anunnaki blood, Atlantis blood but most of all its known as Rh0- blood which means it lacks the Rhesus Monkey gene and just throws a monkey wrench into mainstream history because genetics is debunking the out of Africa theory and showing a obvious migration from the Atlantic Ocean from the end of the younger dryas period 11600 years ago roughly.. the Baask people also say they're survivors from a place called Atlantica!
your speculation is accurate in regards to the earth but you should be made aware that part of the pre flood world was that the planets were in far different orbits. i believe the moons , father sky, and 'great sun' of the atlantis period are different bodies from those of our current age.
Egyptians, or Greeks may have seen the Richat structure, assumed it was man made, and imagined a city once existed there, and there you have the origin of the Atlantis myth
Great work! It all seems reasonable except for Mauritania. If there was an observatory at the Richat structure, wouldn’t there be some physical evidence? There isn’t any evidence of an observatory at Bimini, either, but at least there is a monolith.
Depends. There is a lot of stuff at the Richat Structure that show that at one point is was indeed submerged. After a giant flood that went over Africa, for which there is evidence, hardly any building would have survived. Randall Carlson has a great video about this in Africa as megafloods are his field of expertise. I suggest you check it out.
In spain and morocco's there's atlantis type symbols simlar to the maze circles you see in northern latitudes. The barber writings is another clue. I believe the whole thing with atlantis the fall was blood sacrifice baal worship canaanites in the lavant cartridginians in spain all offered up their children to the fire . The very early sights near cadiz and further north all worshipped the bull.
Mainstream archaeology isn't something we shouldn't trust Avebury could be much old than they say it is the corrosion of the stones looks like they have been there at least 8 to 10 thousand years i believe they wouldn't have originally built markers out of wood before large stones. Its extremely important by its size carnac in France it part of this system.
My first question is to your assumption that the clovis first 'ice-free corridor' is true, there is plenty of genetic and other evidence that suggests it is an antiquated and misleading theory, what is it that you find compelling that you mention it across you videos? Secondly why must the Richat structure be included in this theory? I see why you want it included because it sort of justifies the link to Atlantis and the concentric rings, however you're saying they did lots of fishing and then started navigating out to find new lands, well how do you propose that development if they chose to live 500km away from the shoreline today - I can only imagine the distance circa 20-10k bp. Ultimately it only stands to detract from the overall theory since there is as far as I know not a single piece of physical evidence it was ever inhabited. Please take this as the considered critical thought you apply to all your videos, after all, these conversations should be brought together argued and justified. It is a fantastic series, unfortunately due to the nature of commenting I am choosing to bring up the things I disagree on, there is a lot I have learned and that I do agree with you on most points.
Wow, thanks for binge watching my entire Atlantis series so quickly AND taking the time to comment! With regards to your questions: • I totally agree that there is growing evidence for different waves of peoples entering the Americas prior to the Clovis cultures. The point is that the creation story has to be AT LEAST as old as the LAST pre-historic people to enter the Americas. It's possible that the story is older and arrived with earlier populations. I probably needed to make this clearer in my video. • I've always been very skeptical about the Richat / Atlantis link... that was until I found a geometric, geodetic and astronomical link between the Richat, Avebury and my site in the Azores. After reading the works of Howard Crowhurst and Richard Heath, I became aware that there was a drive to build ancient sites of extreme significance at latitudinal intervals of sevenths from the equator (Averbury is located at 4/7 North, "Atlantis" is located at 3/7 North). Both Crowhurst and Heath have noted that there are ancient sites in places like the UK (amongst others) that are spread out over vast distances, linked by right-angle triangles with at least one cardinal vector, with this in mind I drew the only right-angle triangle possible that has the Azores "Atlantis" as the origin, Avebury as a known vertex AND a true-east vector of 90.00° emanating from the origin. This triangle can be reflected about the true-east vector to give us the location of the Richat Structure. Initially I thought this might just be some geometric coincidence, but it turns out that there are practical geodetic and astronomical reasons for placing "Atlantis" and Avebury where they are in relation to the Richat. I haven't explained this any of my videos, but there is a whole chapter relating to this in my upcoming book. I definitely need to do a better job of explaining things a little more clearly. Also, I sometimes omit some of the more technical information to keep the video flowing, it's difficult to find a good balance when trying to present findings and maintain audience attention / retention. That's one of the reasons why I'm writing a book, I want to present some of the more technical / mathematical information in a more conducive medium. Thanks for taking the time to comment, I welcome valid criticism / feedback (especially when great thought and time has been put into it), there are certainly areas where I need to up my game.
You lost me at the Richard structure. It's just a crater. The reality is that if the richard was a settlement, for as you state thousands of years AND it was not destroyed by water because of the drying sahara, there would be SO MUCH evidence of human activity. I'm talking about both megaliths and septic tanks and pieces of petrified wood and ovens and the list goes on and on. The european route is much more plausible.
@@kurteibell2885 I expected a better timeline to be honest. The way he pieces it is too unrealistic and requires a lot of figgething with the very scares evidence. Many of the proposed sites lack the features required for his hypothesis, like Bimini is just a row of rocks manmade or natural. I don't understand how it can be useful as an observatory. Also the stones at the megalithic sites don't seem to correlate all that much with any significant astronomical events other than the solstices. I mean if they knew how big the planet is why didn't they make the stone circles more representative of that.
@@GeneralGreevas This is just one researcher's timeline and I would hope he continues to update it with new information (maybe Episode 4.1 or 6.3 type of thing). Because this is all conjecture from the available information, I think his overall assembly is applaudable. Are there questions and disagreements? Sure, but I, and I presume you, have not put this kind of effort into expanding the research into the Atlantis myth. I don't want to discourage his bigger picture over a couple of loose strings.
Plato lived hundreds of years after the supposed Atlantis..so using him as a reference is very weak. That's like me talking about something that happened in the middle ages..it's pure speculation
I heard that a lot of Atlantis theories are based on Arianism, and support the supposed fact that Atlantis was a white population of people that was the seed of all culture in the world. I love to say, now that the series has come to an end, that I like your theory a lot. It does not emphasize this in any regard, and is very convincing.
Why would that element discredit him? The European Cro-Magnon population of Europe in the Paleolithic was the most sophisticated in culture anywhere. How do you reconcile that?
I only turn on adds at the beginning and the end of my videos. By default, UA-cam places adds throughout the entire video (mid-roll), I forgot to uncheck this box this time as there are now a lot of boxes to check/uncheck every time you upload a video. Thanks for your comment, as I went back in and turned of the mid-roll adverts as soon as you sent your message. If you don't want any ads at all, you can always watch my video on Odysee instead: odysee.com/@Apocalypse:5/Ep.10-Atlantis:1
How would these “observatories” actually help anyone navigate? There would be no way for a sailor to know where these “markers” are in relation to their location. No way for the observatories to communicate. Indeed, the inhabitants of these areas would not speak the same language. You are starting from a conclusion and working backwards, looking for, or rather imagining, evidence that supports your forgone conclusion. It is an intellectually bankrupt mode of investigation
The time line is way off. Your idea about origin of humanity is very simplistic and not even explanatory. And then, further on, you know the "out of Africa theory" has been debunked years ago? According to anthropologists nowadays, humans emerged in several different areas, not in one place. The megalitic constructions around the world, are much older than archaeologists suggest. You really have to rethink about that. So many places have been destroyed, stone constructions melted etc. This strongly indicate many sites have been built long before latest cataclysm. And think of Göebli Tepe, Kaharan Tepe etc. They were buried about 11600 years ago. They were not built at that time. Further more, when talking about connections, you forgot about all sites in Peru, Bolivia, Guatemala and so on. Also China, India, Japan and sw Asia. Europe. Megalitic constructions everywhere. Also. The sumerians, and the cuneiform tablets... Yes I know. You want to support your Atlantis theory. And it would be great if it would be found in the Azores. But besides that...
You're a very intelligent man, but unfortunatly still infected by some of the false teachings in this time. Also I learned that The Azores is what's left of the Atlantis years ago..
Sir, you have won as a supporter of your hypothesis. You have touched on almost all the disciplines. EXCELLENT WORK!
This is a great series with a ton of information. As someone who lives in the Azores, I welcome you and hope to see you when you investigate the site off our shores.
Thanks for your support.
I have an urge to move there
Would you consider hosting other travelers to the Azores ?
@@rebeccasimmers9363 Sure. Love to show off the island!
@kurteibell2885 that's wonderful. I'm working on trying to visit next year. Maybe even look into staying. Looks like a lovely place to retire too.
I have been doing a lot of the investigation that you have clearly done on my own. Everything that you have said is nearly spot on with all of the reasonable suppositions that you can make with the available information. The timeline you are working on is almost unimportant compared to the overall narrative you have come up with. Keep up the good work!
Apologies for the double comment, but now that I've had a chance to watch the full video I just wanted to come back and give a more detailed response. Prior to this video I must say that I had more or less written off the Richat Structure in my mind as a potential location for Atlantis, due to it being a natural structure. However, I had never considered what you proposed, which is that a group of nomads in that region stumbled upon it, and took advantage of the protection it offered, which opened an opportunity up to them to advance their understanding of the world much faster than their peer groups around the world due to not having to worry about predators, and using the structure as inspiration for their new home once it was time to move on. So the Richat Structure was NOT Atlantis, but it did INSPIRE Atlantis. This all makes perfect sense. It really does. It answers all the primary questions. WHO the people were that initially populated the island, WHERE they came from, WHY they wound up going there in the first place, WHEN the migrated, and HOW they became more advanced than their peers. I was trying to find holes in your theory, but I simply cannot, other than that I'm not sure I buy that Bimini ever factored into things, but that's secondary. In anycase, thanks again for putting in the work and advancing all our collective knowledge!
Perhaps you're right about Bimini, this timeline is just a speculative model for now, I'm open to changing it as new evidence arises. At this point I want to explore the underwater site in the Azores before I revisit the timeline, I'm either right and more time needs to be spent trying to understand the true timeline, or I'm wrong - the site could just be an interesting geological anomaly and the whole timeline gets scrapped. Thanks for watching and taking the time to put together such a great comment. Cheers.
What is the depth of the ocean at the Azores Plateau?
Great video. You deserve more subs. Best evidence for the location of Atlantis I have seen yet. Randall had already convinced me it was in the Azores and now I'm more certain. Keep the videos coming!
Thanks for watching and taking the time to comment. There's more videos on the way!
@@MatApocalypse 👍👍
How did the algorithm take so long to lead me here? This is amazing! Thank you so much!
Thanks for watching and thanks for your kind comments.
To answer your question:
I don't post frequently enough to earn a high rank from the algorithm.
Dude, im just 10 minutes in to the video and so far this has been the most fantastic shit on Atlantis i''ve come across....i hope you are writing a book on this...if so TAKE MY MONEY NOW!
Thanks so much!
Excellent video, well put together with quality geodetic info - the either the greatest coincidence in history or you have found the thread linking us to the ancient past.
I hope Randal, Graham, Howard Crowhurst or the brothers of the serpent finds this information and has a good delve into your ideas.
Thanks for your kind comments.
Your theories sound very sane and interesting, based upon solid evidence.
This should be taken very seriously
Totally agree
Thanks, but it's a very niche subject, I don't expect a lot of people to take me seriously. It's up to me to find a way to survey the site in the Azores in more detail.
Man, this is the most concise and plausible timeline I've ever listened to.
It follows my same train of logic, as well as adding in a bunch of "ah-hah" possibilities.
(Such as the Richat structure being an earlier inhabited [& probably inspiration], for the Island civilization that followed).
Thank you for all of your time and research into this, hope to meet someday. Cheers, from FL.
Thanks for watching and taking the time to comment.
It’s been a joy to follow along these videos. I think you really have put in a great deal of focused, empiric work and are potentially onto something big here. As compelling as this proposed timeline is, however, I’m afraid it will remain simply interesting until irrefutable evidence is found. Irrefutable evidence won’t be found unless it is searched for. That is the hurdle - getting enough resources, interest, funding, and coordination to actualize an undersea exploration of the Azores plateau. I only wish I knew how to make that happen.
I am working on getting down there, these things take a long time though.
@@MatApocalypse I would be willing to help in any way I could.
So glad youre still alive! look forward to your updates
I'm glad I'm still alive too, thanks.
37:00 your suspicion that solar activity is linked to these phenomena is spot-on, imo.
It is derided by the 'mainstream' physics community but as an engineer myself, the "Electric Universe" model proposed by electrical/plasma engineers over on the Thunderbolts channel makes much more practical sense to me than the gravity-only model of mainstream cosmology. It is something you might want to check out.
Not just solar flairs but also comets and rogue planets (Venus is thought to be one even by academia) which are at a different electrical potential to the earth (because they originate from outside our helioshere)
would discharge MASSIVE arcs, plasma-machining the surface, as it achieves electrical equilibrium with our local electrical environment.
As such...it has always stuck me how mountain chains and the streams coming off them look like lightening bolts with fine streamers fanning from the main arc.
Water cuts through the weakest rock...so were minerals arranged along electrical discharge paths so that they will be the most erodeable paths for runoff water to cut permanent channels into?
Deeply appreciate your channel.
-John
Thank you for this whole series. I truly wait with anticipation for your next one
More to come!
I've been on the creation path for some time now, I can concur that all myths have the same common thread of creation. I believe the hunter gatherers were the survivors of the first flood 12,000 BCE. These were the story bearers so who knows how convoluted the story has become. You have spent a huge amount of time and energy on this presentation. Well done and thanks for the upload. ENKI ENLIL = Yahweh Yeshua = SETH HORUS etc, all with the winged disc AN or RA. The tree of life comes up in every culture, and the pillars of djed basalt 8 sided pillars like the giants causeway in Ireland have a huge bearing on the design of Atlantis Hy Brasil etc.
I've been waiting on this one for a couple of months now. Yaay!
Thanks for waiting. Hope it was worth it.
Absolutely fantastic production!! Really really appreciate the work you put into this.
Thanks so much. This was months of work, just for a video that lasts for a little less than an hour in length.
I'm glad to have found your channel.
Each video is captivating AND educational.
Best for last, something in each one 🤯 blows my mind with the reasonableness and unexpected connections that so simply & directly explains these mysteries.
Good to see someone who doesn't resort to dramatizing and exaggeration discuss these topics.
♥ 🙏🏻
John
Been waiting on this one for awhile
Thanks for your patience.
YESS! Phenomenal! You are the best on this topic!
Wow, thank you!
Wonderful mind's food presentation. Thank you.
Thanks for watching.
Thank you Matt so much for your hard work. You are absolutely brilliant, and deserve... Oh I don't know... a few million more subscribers?
I really appreciate your channel. I am looking forward to watch future videos.
I appreciate that! I see your channel has also been growing steadily 👍
An absolute travesty that you haven't gotten more attention. This is incredibly detailed and informative.
You easily equal Randal Carlson in information.
Very kind of you, but it's difficult to get anyone's attention if you're trying to come up with plausible explanations. A lot of people are interested in the idea of an ancient civilisation that was technologically superior to our own, I'm just not seeing that, I think this was all done by hunter gatherers, or possibly a very early agricultural society. It's gotten to the point where the whole "Atlantis" subject now has it's own sci-fi lore developed by self proclaimed psychics, unless you link Atlantis to Aliens or a lost spacefaring human civilisation, most people aren't interested. To me, I think it's more impressive if the world was explored and mapped by a group of people from the Palaeolithic/Neolithic.
What I'm doing is well within the realms of speculation, but I think I've developed something worthy of further investigation. It's a shame that serious researchers such as the Heath brothers or Howard Crowhurst aren't getting the recognition that they deserve, after many, many years of research. I knew full well when I started this channel that it wouldn't be hugely popular, I'm surprised that I've got this many subscribers to be honest. I really do appreciate the kind comments from yourself and other viewers and I'm happy that there are people enjoying my videos.
@@MatApocalypse I'm a forex trader. I can fund things.
Jus sayin
@Apocalypse I don't know why, but I always imagined the Atlanteans as having technology roughly equivalent to the Greeks or Romans, maybe even the early 18th or 19th centuries, while living in an age of hunter gatherers. Big ships, advanced navigation, and a society built on trade, with maybe the very early beginnings of what we would consider "modern" technology, like gears, primitive batteries, steam locomotion, or even toying with electricity and lightbulbs...but no nukes or magic crystals lol...and they weren't the only civilization, simply the most advanced and wide-reaching, and they were just utterly destroyed by a worldwide cataclysm, which if the research is correct, was caused by a comet impact. Maybe their astronomers could see the comet coming and knew what would happened, and tried to save their culture somehow.
@@Earthwise. What is the distance between the Atlantis Prime Meridian and Greenwich Mean Time?
I have a suspicion that it it has a lot to do with Freemason Sacred numbers.
Amazing information!!!! And sobering to think how humans managed to survive at all - and further what our future could be.
How awesome, thanks so very much.
Thanks for taking the time to watch. This is my longest video so far.
I'd really like it if you keep doing videos about your research into the azores, and anything else relevant to this topic. Wish there was funds to have robotic submersibles sent down into the Atlantic in the area you propose to be Atlantis. I'd be really curious to see what's down there.
I've got some other videos I want to make first, but I'm sure I'll re-visit the Azores topic. I'm sure I'll find a way to explore the site, it will just take some patience.
Thank you so much. It was fantastic.
Glad you enjoyed it!
Very convincing Sir. Amazing.
Thank you so much. I put a lot of work into this one.
Giuseppe Katapano: "Atlantida which disappeared 12,000 years ago, was the land of the Illyrians (Pelasgians), who escaped the flood of Atlantis and began new civilizations on all continents, especially in Europe, Africa and Small Asia small". THOTH spoke Albanian!
I’ve enjoyed this series very much.. I congratulated you on a very viable location and truly believe it needs to be explored as soon as possibly..
since watching this I’ve been exploring under water submersibles :)
I would suggest a kick starter for private funding.
Thanks for watching. I'll certainly be looking into the crowdfunding aspect once I grow the channel a little more. Looking at prices, it would probably be cheaper to build my own ROV and boat than it would be to hire them.
@@MatApocalypse I am a motorsport fabricator based in Bristol, my work can be found at @kam-fab
Please contact me in future if you need any help on this project moving forward. Kind regards
Harry
I'm only up in Malvern, I'll let you know if I need any help.
If you started a GoFundMe, I promise I'd contribute!
There are enough people following Jimmy on Bright Insight and Randall Carlson and Graham Hancock who I believe would be happy to help fund this endeavor.
38:00 the serpent has also been proposed as electricity - as an arc "snaking" through a medium. The comet you mentioned could have discharged arcs to the surface of the earth during a very near miss rather than smashing into the earth...thus the dragon or snake motif indicateds a comet but indirectly associated with a the arcs arising from a comet's near miss.
Sharing your thoughts is welcome and encouraged. 🙂
Thoughts on Gunung Padang and where it might fit into the timeline?
It's south of the Equator, so it's not possible to fit Gunung Padang into my Northern Hemisphere observatory network.
It's latitude is interesting at 7° south of the Equator. The Northern Hemisphere observatories are separated by latitudes that are 1/7 of the distance from the Equator to the North Pole. 1/7 of 90° means that these latitudinal intervals sit 12.85714° north or south from each other. 90° / 7° gives us the opposite relationship, Gunung Padang sits 1/12.85714 south of the Equator.
Perhaps Gunung Padang serves a similar purpose to the observatories in the Northern Hemisphere. This doesn't mean that it was built by the same people, it could be that a different group of people at a different time had a similar grasp of geometry and were trying to perform the same task of measuring the size of the planet. It also could just be a coincidence.
I have no idea how old Gunung Padang is, I would like to see Danny Hilman Natawidjaja publish his findings in a peer reviewed paper.
@@MatApocalypse Thanks for the thorough response! I agree that GP could easily be the work of a separate group. It is interesting that they also used basalt columns, but I suppose it would be the perfect building material for any early people once they started dabbling in stone structures. I like your idea of the richat structure being abandoned due to climate change. I thought its destruction could be tied the the YD impact theory, but it sounds like it was earlier. I think it makes sense that they would have left If the conditions became unsuitable. Fantastic video and theory. Thanks amigo!
51:47 Please let us know when you’re book is released. I really love your ideas. Thank you.
I will do, thanks for your kind comment and for watching my videos.
Thanks for a video!
Thanks for watching!
Been waiting for this :)
Thanks for waiting.
Great series from a great man
Great comment from a great viewer.
The Pyramids on the azores i believe is coverings something same as the one's on the cabary islands they look like structure that are covering or hiding something important.
I believe the canal that was built to connect to the inland sea from the "southern gate" of the city was orientated along the tilt of the Earth. Aligned with the temple observatory at the center of the city..
Brillant. 👍👍👍👍👍
Great video!
Glad you enjoyed it!
Have you read anything of Edgar Cayce or Rudolf Steiner/Blavatsky regarding Atlantis?
Love it, thank you.
Glad you enjoyed it!
What about the possibility
the Great Pyramid was built
Pre-Flood First and the others
Afterwards by attempting to
Copy it?
I just don't see any evidence for this right now. We can even name the architect (Hemiunu) who designed the Great Pyramid. That's not to say it wasn't built over something much older.
Have you included the tectonic plate shifts?
The tragic thing with fictional histories is, that the more detail one adds, the less likely they become overall.
Still I agree, that the whole (speculative) story needs telling and creatively reconstructing, as the main pillars / motifs / memes are so suggestive.
True, I don't think I'm right about everything, just trying to put together the best picture as I see it with the limited information that we have. Great comment thanks.
Thank you so much for putting in the effort and time to make all this. This is one of the best video essay series I've seen!
The evidence pointing to a possible Atlantic civilization is very convincing, but I disagree with your proposed timeline. I don't think the the Atlantians came out of southern Africa.
1. With the proliferation of sub-saharan peoples throughout the Atlantic coasts wouldn't there be genetic remnants of resistances to certain diseases like malaria?
2. I recently watched Carlson's Halloween video essay and he mentions how Halliburton found cultural similarities of diverse peoples from all over the world that have similar observances of the taurid meteor stream. From Europeans, to Japanese, to Australian natives, to Peruvians. No mention of African peoples though.
3. Carlson hypothesizes that what we call the gulf stream went around the Azores plateau, going south on the east side. Wouldn't this impede the travel of people going northwest from Africa?
Just some thoughts. Thank you for putting this info out there.
Thank you for your kind words and for taking the time to put together your comment.
I think it's unlikely that I'm correct about everything in my timeline, I'm more confident about the timing and placement of Atlantis and the observatories than I am about the origins of these people. With regards to your three points:
1. If there weren't many Atlantean survivors, perhaps any genetic resistance to malaria gets watered down over time by breeding with people who have no resistance. If there were a significant number of Atlantean survivors, how many generations before genetic resistance is lost? If the survivors settled in regions free of Malaria, then these genes might not be selected for by potential mates, sickle cell disease for example, might make it tough to survive and pass on your genes, and there's always natural genetic mutation. However, it's a good point and worthy of further exploration.
2. I haven't done enough research about ancient African mythology, it's something I'm working on and there are certainly a number of flood myths that parallel those that are found outside of Africa. If the Taurids played some role in the destruction of Atlantis it would certainly make sense to weave them into your traditions, but if the Atlantean survivors decided not to settle in sub-Saharan Africa after the island sank, then there would be no trace of these traditions found in sub-Saharan Africa today. It doesn't mean that they weren't from sub-Saharan Africa originally.
3. This is a good point, it really depends upon the type of sails these people were using. My stance is that the early exploration of the Atlantic was performed by hunter gatherers (maybe with some early animal husbandry), using fairly primitive vessels, I'm thinking along the lines of large hollowed out logs with outriggers, possibly sealed with tree resin mixed with charcoal for extra protection from the water. These primitive vessels wouldn't have been able to accommodate the sort of sails that you would find on modern European vessels. They would more likely be equipped with the kind of sails that you would find on a Junk Rig. These junk sails don't allow for the same kind of speeds or efficiencies that can be obtained from modern European sails, but they're easier to operate, require less man power and more importantly allow you to sail into the wind with relative ease. If these early seafarers had junk sails or something similar, they wouldn't have been at the mercy of ocean currents (ocean currents would certainly allow for faster travel once they were mapped out). To me, the logical way to explore the ocean without the aid of modern navigational equipment is to choose a fixed latitude and stick with it until you've found something.
I'm still 50/50 on whether or not these people originated in sub-Saharan Africa, maybe they came down to the Richat through the Middle-East? Maybe it was the meeting of two different cultures? If people from Europe / the Middle-East met up with people from sub-Saharan Africa, they may have combined their astronomical knowledge and came up with some significant epiphanies. The Atlanteans could have originated from anywhere, I'm just speculating based on the information that we have so far (Mousterian Pluvial / Dates for Sea Level / Dates for observatory placement etc...), but this is all subject to change as new information comes to light.
Thanks for taking the time to comment.
hey,
have you recently checked out ben van kerkwyk?
he is from the uncharted x channel
i dont follow him myself too much but he has brought up some things of ancient advanced machining
something which i notice you either avoid or maybe dont know about.
but something that struck me was he mentions these scoop marks cut out granite and they have pre dyanistic paintings on them.
I have, he puts out some great content and goes out into the field a heck of a lot. I will explain my opinions on ancient machining in a later video at some point.
I'm afraid I don't agree with Ben though. My background is in engineering and I can see a number of relatively simple ways to accomplish what has been attributed to ancient machining. I do believe that various wooden forms and jigs were used to align and guide ancient hand tools to achieve some quite impressive workmanship (I have drawings and CAD renders of my ideas ready to make a future video). I often see Ben getting surface roughness mixed up with flatness, these are two completely different properties. I'm also not sure he understands the limitations of non-contact measuring equipment; when using this kind of equipment you often have to factor in ADC error amongst other variables. I've spoken with people who work in metrology who have taken issue with some of his claims. If you're wondering how large rocks can be moved with relative ease, look into the work of Wally Wallington, a retired construction worker who can move gigantic stone structures by himself with no machinery required, just a lifetime of practical experience, it's easy to see how Wally's techniques could be scaled up to move larger structures using more people or even animal power.
I'm really not trying to rail on Ben, I still watch his channel and enjoy his videos, I think his understanding of metrology is getting better, but I would say he has too much focus on ancient machining, there are definitely other solutions that might require a little more hard work that end up with the same result. It's my opinion that we may have severely underestimated what our ancestors could do without the luxuries of our modern technology, even so far back as our hunter gatherer ancestors. I think a lot of skills and trades have been lost over the millennia, even in recent times with the modern industrial phenomenon of having a job as opposed to a skill or trade.
@@MatApocalypse but what about holes being drilled into different granite materials in Egypt? Just saw a video on it last night, where the gentleman described that the different stone has a hardness of 8 on the moh scale, and that only within the past 100ish years we've been able to utilize the power of diamonds to make cutting and drilling these hard materials possible.
Anyways, great video series you have. I also wonder, your proposed site of Atlantis, is it in international waters? Is it difficult to be able to even reach the site with basic scuba diving? Or is it a lot farther down?
It sounds like if you can get Elon Musk's attention, maybe you can convince him that it's worth investigating further. He was, after all, interested in Egypt recently.
I'm also willing to bet that the pillars in Egypt that depict atlantis (that you mentioned in one video) are either in the Labyrinth, or sealed away below the Sphinx (see info on the original Sphinx's shape and name being Hemit... references to library/ archive). Have you seen the video on where they have found the Labyrinth back in 2008, and kept it hush-hush until just recently? I wonder if that ties in with any of the 7 latitude lines... Plato also visited the Labyrinth, if I'm not mistaken.
I know I'm off on a tangent and pretty vague, but Egypt and Atlantis are 2 major pieces of the same puzzle, and it seems like the Egyptian authorities/ Egyptologists know a lot more than they let on, as they have controlled the narrative for the sake of tourism and dismissed all scientific evidence and research they do not like to hear that questions their timeline of the pyramids and their construction.
You should have a chat to bright insight, I think both your theories could be pieces to the puzzle
Ok so the Adam and Eve story is in the Richat and they are banished by an angel with a sword of fire (possible the sun being too hot). They move to Azores and there the Noah story happens?
Great info, I really enjoyed your video but I think you could’ve elaborated on the possible diffusion of culture from that island. It’s possible when acknowledging how most temples and other monolithic sites were built upon even older sites that use bigger stones and are made using considerably more advanced construction methods due to the precision of the design, such as at machu pichu, baalbek temple, the barabar caves and other similar places around the world. I think it might be possible that all those people from “Atlantis” or whatever the island could’ve been called might have advanced considerably due to the time and ideal conditions they had to do so and maybe predominantly in their construction methods, metallurgy, stone masonry, and without a doubt the ability to farm and collect livestock. It’s interesting to consider the azores are known for their cows and cheese production..
Interesting, what is most compelling to me in regards to Atlantis is essentially the power of the gulf stream, it is why the weather in the UK is so damn consistent because we are fed with the sweet warming waters of the gulf stream that helps regulate the climate. This is exactly what the Azores would have benefitted from throughout the ice age, it would have been the most optimally inhabitable place possibly on the planet due to this particular benefit.
Are there any books (historical fiction) that present this material in a compelling narrative?
A lot of it is my own speculative research, so as far as I am aware no-one has written any historical (prehistorical) fiction.
@Apocalypse_Tube I feel in my DNA that you are on to something enormous , profound, and paradigm shifting. How can we support your work? I would welcome the opportunity to interview you someday. I have so many questions.
@@rebeccasimmers9363 I definitely think I'm on to something, how much of it I've got right is another question. If you want to support my work just keep watching my videos, like (or dislike), subscribe and leave a comment. If you have any questions, you can always send me an email (you can find my correspondence email if you click on my channel ).
About 100 thousand years the great flood happened. The ancient ancients went back to primitive, survived in caves, wrote on walls, eventually to go full circle once again, Atlantis, ancient Egypt, ancient Athens. They fall. We are probably 90 thousand years til the next event. We essentially become so technologically advanced and eventually it’s like the world strikes back.
the serpent attacking the roots of the tree of life could be a massive tsunami in the picture it shows a snake in a circle pattern around the island at 38:39
Certainly could be. The serpent might represent many different kinds of disaster.
yeah for sure.
That Richat connection is a stretch. I don't think Richat had anything to do with Atlantis. It's look is a pure coincidence.
I've tried to put a timeline together as best as I can with the information that I have. Maybe I'm wrong about people inhabiting the Richat structure, but it is geometrically linked to Avebury and Atlantis in a way that allows certain astronomical measurements to be made with simplified calculations.
@@MatApocalypse i think there have been settlements there. there are outlines of where old buildings were, jimmy from bright insight had shown some.
@@commonsense-og1gz These buildings are almost certainly abandoned forts built by the French Foreign Legion. Lots of them have the foundations of corner towers, which were common features in French desert forts.
We must convince James Cameron and Simcha Jacobovici to investigate the structure under water. 😄🥳
Good luck!
Well done!
A surprisingly low viewership; such has happened in the past.
Thanks for your kind comments. There seems to be two different view points on alternate history:
1. The story told to us by academics is mostly true.
OR
2. There was an advanced civilisation in the past that had telekinetic powers and advanced technology.
I'm coming from a different place, suggesting that stone-age people with stone-age technology were capable of measuring, charting and navigating the globe. It's very difficult for my ideas to gain traction when Option 1 is taken as gospel by most people and Option 2 is much more exciting than anything I can come up with.
I suspect I will be vindicated over time. It seems to be mostly engineers and people who are good at math that see things my way.
Thanks for watching.
I would challenge you to look at Atlantis as both a continent as well as a city, the island was what was left after the Continental mass separated the island was once the Capitol city of the continent with land upwards of 2000 ft above sea level and lowlands at or mildly below sea level depending on when you found yourself there the highlands had different names by those who lived there and those who visited but the lowlands only had one name Lemuria.
What does Geodesy mean?
In ancient times, Geodesy was the science of measuring and representing the geometry of the Earth (measuring the size and shape of the Earth and it's orientation relative to the orbital plane around the sun). In more modern times, Geodesy also includes the measurement and representation of gravity (gravity varies ever so slightly depending where you are located on Earth).
@@MatApocalypse Oh
wouldn't you think they would have created pottery during all that time? it didn't appear until ~7kya
The sunken capital city of Atlantis is due West of the Straits, and due South of Terceira Island. The plain of Atlantis is due West and Southward of that point. The plain is 3500 meters underwater.
Pictures and coordinates?
@@MatApocalypse take a look at my video "Atlantis (2 miles down)" , feel free to silence the audio if you wish. You will see a still image with the most accurate bathemetry image of Atlantis available, with latitude and longitude . The Great Plain of Atlantis is apparent in the South East quadrant. It is referred to as the Azore Plain.
Also I found interesting the Baask and Berber people being decendants of Cro-Magnon interesting considering Cro-Magnon blood is also known as blue blood, royal blood, alien blood, Anunnaki blood, Atlantis blood but most of all its known as Rh0- blood which means it lacks the Rhesus Monkey gene and just throws a monkey wrench into mainstream history because genetics is debunking the out of Africa theory and showing a obvious migration from the Atlantic Ocean from the end of the younger dryas period 11600 years ago roughly.. the Baask people also say they're survivors from a place called Atlantica!
I thought the Cro-Magnon people were synonymous with Neanderthals?
your speculation is accurate in regards to the earth but you should be made aware that part of the pre flood world was that the planets were in far different orbits. i believe the moons , father sky, and 'great sun' of the atlantis period are different bodies from those of our current age.
Egyptians, or Greeks may have seen the Richat structure, assumed it was man made, and imagined a city once existed there, and there you have the origin of the Atlantis myth
Great work! It all seems reasonable except for Mauritania. If there was an observatory at the Richat structure, wouldn’t there be some physical evidence? There isn’t any evidence of an observatory at Bimini, either, but at least there is a monolith.
The great flood scoured the land clean of evidence. Nothing remains.
Depends. There is a lot of stuff at the Richat Structure that show that at one point is was indeed submerged. After a giant flood that went over Africa, for which there is evidence, hardly any building would have survived. Randall Carlson has a great video about this in Africa as megafloods are his field of expertise. I suggest you check it out.
I have not come across any evidence suggesting that part of Mauritania was submerged before the Paleolithic. Please reference.
@@JordanFreshour Randall Carlson: 'Mega-Scale Floods in North Africa near Richat? Map Comparisons to Known Features w/ Randall Carlson'
dated 01Oct22.
Bright Insight channel did recent vid on this topic.
ua-cam.com/video/xo_fMcSLp7Q/v-deo.html
There is a mt that has basalt hexagonal rocks its not been unearthed but I'm sure that's the place yiur speaking of
It is an archeological site not just a mt
THE SNAKE IS THE AURORA BOREALIS
The mythical snake that eats its tail is even called the “ouroboros”, that sounds very similar to “aurora borealis”
In spain and morocco's there's atlantis type symbols simlar to the maze circles you see in northern latitudes. The barber writings is another clue. I believe the whole thing with atlantis the fall was blood sacrifice baal worship canaanites in the lavant cartridginians in spain all offered up their children to the fire . The very early sights near cadiz and further north all worshipped the bull.
Mainstream archaeology isn't something we shouldn't trust Avebury could be much old than they say it is the corrosion of the stones looks like they have been there at least 8 to 10 thousand years i believe they wouldn't have originally built markers out of wood before large stones. Its extremely important by its size carnac in France it part of this system.
Do you have a contact email that I can reach you privately?
The correspondence address for this channel can be found in the "about" tab on my channel page (apocalypse144@protonmail.com)
My first question is to your assumption that the clovis first 'ice-free corridor' is true, there is plenty of genetic and other evidence that suggests it is an antiquated and misleading theory, what is it that you find compelling that you mention it across you videos?
Secondly why must the Richat structure be included in this theory? I see why you want it included because it sort of justifies the link to Atlantis and the concentric rings, however you're saying they did lots of fishing and then started navigating out to find new lands, well how do you propose that development if they chose to live 500km away from the shoreline today - I can only imagine the distance circa 20-10k bp. Ultimately it only stands to detract from the overall theory since there is as far as I know not a single piece of physical evidence it was ever inhabited.
Please take this as the considered critical thought you apply to all your videos, after all, these conversations should be brought together argued and justified. It is a fantastic series, unfortunately due to the nature of commenting I am choosing to bring up the things I disagree on, there is a lot I have learned and that I do agree with you on most points.
Wow, thanks for binge watching my entire Atlantis series so quickly AND taking the time to comment!
With regards to your questions:
• I totally agree that there is growing evidence for different waves of peoples entering the Americas prior to the Clovis cultures. The point is that the creation story has to be AT LEAST as old as the LAST pre-historic people to enter the Americas. It's possible that the story is older and arrived with earlier populations. I probably needed to make this clearer in my video.
• I've always been very skeptical about the Richat / Atlantis link... that was until I found a geometric, geodetic and astronomical link between the Richat, Avebury and my site in the Azores. After reading the works of Howard Crowhurst and Richard Heath, I became aware that there was a drive to build ancient sites of extreme significance at latitudinal intervals of sevenths from the equator (Averbury is located at 4/7 North, "Atlantis" is located at 3/7 North). Both Crowhurst and Heath have noted that there are ancient sites in places like the UK (amongst others) that are spread out over vast distances, linked by right-angle triangles with at least one cardinal vector, with this in mind I drew the only right-angle triangle possible that has the Azores "Atlantis" as the origin, Avebury as a known vertex AND a true-east vector of 90.00° emanating from the origin. This triangle can be reflected about the true-east vector to give us the location of the Richat Structure. Initially I thought this might just be some geometric coincidence, but it turns out that there are practical geodetic and astronomical reasons for placing "Atlantis" and Avebury where they are in relation to the Richat. I haven't explained this any of my videos, but there is a whole chapter relating to this in my upcoming book.
I definitely need to do a better job of explaining things a little more clearly. Also, I sometimes omit some of the more technical information to keep the video flowing, it's difficult to find a good balance when trying to present findings and maintain audience attention / retention. That's one of the reasons why I'm writing a book, I want to present some of the more technical / mathematical information in a more conducive medium.
Thanks for taking the time to comment, I welcome valid criticism / feedback (especially when great thought and time has been put into it), there are certainly areas where I need to up my game.
You lost me at the Richard structure. It's just a crater.
The reality is that if the richard was a settlement, for as you state thousands of years AND it was not destroyed by water because of the drying sahara, there would be SO MUCH evidence of human activity.
I'm talking about both megaliths and septic tanks and pieces of petrified wood and ovens and the list goes on and on. The european route is much more plausible.
That was my question as well. Is there evidence of human habitation of the structure more than 7 ka?
@@kurteibell2885 I expected a better timeline to be honest. The way he pieces it is too unrealistic and requires a lot of figgething with the very scares evidence. Many of the proposed sites lack the features required for his hypothesis, like Bimini is just a row of rocks manmade or natural. I don't understand how it can be useful as an observatory. Also the stones at the megalithic sites don't seem to correlate all that much with any significant astronomical events other than the solstices. I mean if they knew how big the planet is why didn't they make the stone circles more representative of that.
@@GeneralGreevas This is just one researcher's timeline and I would hope he continues to update it with new information (maybe Episode 4.1 or 6.3 type of thing). Because this is all conjecture from the available information, I think his overall assembly is applaudable. Are there questions and disagreements? Sure, but I, and I presume you, have not put this kind of effort into expanding the research into the Atlantis myth. I don't want to discourage his bigger picture over a couple of loose strings.
@@kurteibell2885 Totally agree with you Kurt.
There is evidence of humans being there
Cadiz or off the coast of morocco's.
If you believe in expanding earth theory anything is possible.
Plato lived hundreds of years after the supposed Atlantis..so using him as a reference is very weak.
That's like me talking about something that happened in the middle ages..it's pure speculation
people knew how to write, maybe in symbols, but they didn't rely on just talking.
I get your point but we do indeed talk about things that happened in the Middle Ages.
I heard that a lot of Atlantis theories are based on Arianism, and support the supposed fact that Atlantis was a white population of people that was the seed of all culture in the world. I love to say, now that the series has come to an end, that I like your theory a lot. It does not emphasize this in any regard, and is very convincing.
Why would that element discredit him? The European Cro-Magnon population of Europe in the Paleolithic was the most sophisticated in culture anywhere.
How do you reconcile that?
Don't hold back on information.
Putting it in a book is good too, I would read the h*ll out of such a book.
You're theory is sound
More adds means bs
I only turn on adds at the beginning and the end of my videos. By default, UA-cam places adds throughout the entire video (mid-roll), I forgot to uncheck this box this time as there are now a lot of boxes to check/uncheck every time you upload a video. Thanks for your comment, as I went back in and turned of the mid-roll adverts as soon as you sent your message. If you don't want any ads at all, you can always watch my video on Odysee instead:
odysee.com/@Apocalypse:5/Ep.10-Atlantis:1
How would these “observatories” actually help anyone navigate? There would be no way for a sailor to know where these “markers” are in relation to their location. No way for the observatories to communicate. Indeed, the inhabitants of these areas would not speak the same language. You are starting from a conclusion and working backwards, looking for, or rather imagining, evidence that supports your forgone conclusion. It is an intellectually bankrupt mode of investigation
The time line is way off. Your idea about origin of humanity is very simplistic and not even explanatory. And then, further on, you know the "out of Africa theory" has been debunked years ago? According to anthropologists nowadays, humans emerged in several different areas, not in one place.
The megalitic constructions around the world, are much older than archaeologists suggest. You really have to rethink about that. So many places have been destroyed, stone constructions melted etc. This strongly indicate many sites have been built long before latest cataclysm.
And think of Göebli Tepe, Kaharan Tepe etc. They were buried about 11600 years ago. They were not built at that time.
Further more, when talking about connections, you forgot about all sites in Peru, Bolivia, Guatemala and so on. Also China, India, Japan and sw Asia. Europe. Megalitic constructions everywhere.
Also. The sumerians, and the cuneiform tablets...
Yes I know. You want to support your Atlantis theory. And it would be great if it would be found in the Azores.
But besides that...
You're a very intelligent man, but unfortunatly still infected by some of the false teachings in this time. Also I learned that The Azores is what's left of the Atlantis years ago..
The moors wear the one who civilized them cave people
Was that before or after Yakub kicked those devils out of his laboratory?
Lol you can’t even spell, bro.
Bravo sir 👍👏🙏
Amazing information amazing work thank you for making these amazing videos keep it up please hang in there youll get the views someday 🤙👍🙏
Thanks, working on a new video right now, will be out in a couple of weeks.