Gunsmoke | Ep74 | "There Was Never a Horse"

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 37

  • @stuckinmygarage6220
    @stuckinmygarage6220 Рік тому +5

    Thank you for not cutting off the end. and letting the music end 👍

  • @brianboisguilbert6985
    @brianboisguilbert6985 11 місяців тому +3

    This episode is an example of why I enjoy Gunsmoke, most of the endings aren't as cut and dried as the listener is led to believe.

  • @BETTERWORLDSGT
    @BETTERWORLDSGT 2 роки тому +7

    Good one! Whenever Doc talks, I get this powerful hankering to get a Haircut, this Doc must have been old Floyds Grandfather and the family left Dodge sometime and Moved to Mayberry!! Andy, Gomer, {till He joined the Corps) Otis , Howard Sprague and everybody got lots of Haircuts from old Floyd!

  • @tonypike5785
    @tonypike5785 2 роки тому +3

    Wow thats a good one

  • @marlawhite1430
    @marlawhite1430 3 роки тому +9

    Good episode!
    I liked the television version of this episode as well!
    Matt Dillon was afraid 😳

    • @CedroneTravels
      @CedroneTravels 5 місяців тому +1

      No he wasn’t. Death didn’t scare Matt. He just didn’t want to die.

  • @kevinnestor-z7t
    @kevinnestor-z7t Місяць тому

    What a great voice for Cread!

  • @MN-pu6qx
    @MN-pu6qx 8 місяців тому +1

    Another excellent episode., with a rare example of Chester making more sense than Marshall Dillon. As Chester suggests, Dillon and he should have gone after the miscreant with shotguns. The concept of law enforcement is to achieve the mission, not to restrict your tactics to those of the criminal. 14 Apr 2024

  • @hudson8865
    @hudson8865 Рік тому

    Thank you very much.

  • @44032
    @44032 Рік тому +3

    I wonder what would happen if Ken Creed met up with Dan Grat?
    Actually a real western Marshal would come to a confrontation at least with his gun out, if not with a shotgun, surrounded by deputies. It's his job to make sure the law wins, not to try to win fast-draw contests. That's a Hollywood invention. And John Dehner plays both the first victim and the guy who gets Creed in the end.

  • @eveningstarfarm2082
    @eveningstarfarm2082 4 роки тому +3

    Thanks

  • @tirmyta
    @tirmyta 4 роки тому +13

    Would Chester’s family be referred to as the Proudfoots, or the Proudfeet?

    • @garyfrancis6193
      @garyfrancis6193 3 роки тому +5

      Proudfoot family. Unless it’s possessive as in Proudfoot’s house. This possessive adjective can be used as a nominative adjective as “I was at the Proudfoot’s last night.” It’s implied you’re talking about their house. If you are talking about a family member you can say “ He’s a Proudfoot.” If more than one family member “My ancestors were Proudfoots.” Or you were just joking.

    • @tirmyta
      @tirmyta 3 роки тому +2

      @@garyfrancis6193 Thanks!

    • @Rocketpalmgrenade
      @Rocketpalmgrenade 3 роки тому +5

      @@tirmyta Lord of the Rings joke - good stuff

    • @lonniedeckermusic
      @lonniedeckermusic Рік тому

      lol

  • @reiteam2593
    @reiteam2593 3 роки тому +2

    Doc Adams now does ASMR for his patients.

  • @lonniedeckermusic
    @lonniedeckermusic Рік тому

    I love it when Matt screams, "SHUT UP"

  • @totesmagoats45
    @totesmagoats45 Рік тому

    Dillon was shook this episode

  • @brando9508
    @brando9508 3 роки тому +4

    I shot Ken KrrreeeeeD !!

  • @stuckinmygarage6220
    @stuckinmygarage6220 Рік тому +1

    Interesting show title. No horse? Anyone guess the meaning?

    • @cemeteryabcs6346
      @cemeteryabcs6346 Рік тому +4

      The episode talks about it. There was never a horse that couldn’t be rode and never a man that couldn’t be thrown. It’s like the unstoppable force meeting the immovable object.

    • @stuckinmygarage6220
      @stuckinmygarage6220 Рік тому

      @@cemeteryabcs6346 Thank you. Your answer encourages me to relisten. :)

    • @KororaPenguin
      @KororaPenguin Рік тому

      ​@@cemeteryabcs6346​
      I'd been expecting the episode to be some sort of bunco case. Instead, I got a He-Who-Lives-By-The-Sword-Dies-By-The-Sword story.

  • @jrewing1512
    @jrewing1512 3 роки тому +1

    I saw the television episode. Even thought he got shot in the back I didn't feel sorry for him.

    • @KororaPenguin
      @KororaPenguin Рік тому +1

      *Death of Rats:* SQUEAK! [swings scythe]

  • @tacoheadmakenzie9311
    @tacoheadmakenzie9311 Рік тому

    I think I know what Chester's actual job is....to be told to keep out of it.

    • @brianboisguilbert6985
      @brianboisguilbert6985 11 місяців тому +2

      Been a few episodes where Ol Chester was mighty handy to have around.

  • @shezzbeckstowers7923
    @shezzbeckstowers7923 2 роки тому

    Great one as usual but the script ending was written and had us thinking that Creed and Dillon would shoot it out and that the ending would end with Creed outdrawing Dillon by a split second..but missing by smidgen and Dillon striking Creed with his accuracy..thereby Dillon would have won…..but they chose to misdirect us and have someone shoot Creed in the back…which I think for Creed would have not happened ….as he’s cognizant about people trying that.

    • @ShakepearesDaughter
      @ShakepearesDaughter Рік тому +2

      Shows even he can be distracted, and vulnerable to the unexpected. The mistake, in this case, of an arrogant man. Even the best of us is imperfect and subject to ordinary human error. He was expecting a "real" gunman, not some nitwit who was usually drunk and insignificant

    • @brianboisguilbert6985
      @brianboisguilbert6985 11 місяців тому

      @@ShakepearesDaughterMost so called gunfighters ended up like Creed. Jack McCall who killed Hickok from behind, is a real example of the usual type