You missed the most important misdirection. He had a helicopter with a bright spotlight shining on the statue for a considerable length of time during which he apologized to the audience and said they were having "technical problems." Eventually the curtain came across and the stage began to revolve imperceptibly slowly. However the helicopter moved in sync with the stage. The beam of light appeared to be stationary in relation to the stage. When the curtain was lifted they saw the helicopter in the same place but with no statue. The beam of light also helped black out the background. Otherwise the audience would have seen a different skyline. Pure genius!
Interesting, KingRobert. That was one slick chopper pilot who was able to sync up the light with the stage from what I assume would have been at 1,000 feet AGL.
A trick like this is just a nothing burger, there is no skill involved. But seeing people who are really good at sleight of hand perform is really impressive, perhaps even more so when you know how it's done.
I remember this vividly as a child. Not sure I thought much on how it was done. I then ate spaghettiO's for dinner. The following day I rode my bike 4 miles.
Cool! As a kid, I loved watching David Copperfield. I knew it was all tricks, but the experience was what I enjoyed because I didn't know how he pulled it off. For me, it doesn't change my enjoyment to know.
I was fortunate enough to see him the last time I was in Vegas. He still puts on a great show and I'd definitely recommend it to anybody who has the opportunity to see one of the all time greats. There's a reason why he was the first billionaire magician. He puts on a spectacular show. I was somewhat surprised to be able to get such good tickets the day of the show. But, then again he does shows throughout the year and has been for many years.
I recall starting to watch it on tv, but the buildup was so interminably long, it was really tedious waiting for the trick, that we just changed the channel…. We had previously wasted an hour or two waiting for Capone’s safe to be opened just to see there as nothing in it…. was a common approach on shows back then…
close but the actual secret was revealed a few years back in Ghostbusters 2. Copperfield had his staff spray the statue with pink slime and it merely walked a few steps away during the show. Magic!!!
Those David Copperfield Specials were a must back in the 80´s, I remember there were 6 or 8 of them and he always performed something "impossible" at the end of the show. Back then it was insane and we had no idea how he did it, but today it´s so easy to understand how everything was done. I´m not gonna lie I kind of like the fact that now I know how he did all of those tricks, back then I really wanted to know how he could do such amazing tricks but it was impossible to get that information.
Great video. I was impressed back then, and years later, I had heard that the stage moved and he had the bass turned up in the music so the audience did not realize what was going on. Very loud music with a heavy bass can make people confused and even psyched out a little. It can also throw off your balance . So the stage movement would feel normal to the audience, like you greatly mentioned. Thanks Dan.
@Oystersgetclamydia Hello, I hope that you are doing well. Have you been to any more concerts? If so, I hope you got thru it safely and took precautions. I wonder what precautions you could take. Same with others who have other health issues. I agree that the loud bass and other loud sounds that are mixed in at a concert could affect our health and cause issues, but especially if we have any on- going issues. Im sure the loud noise could affect many people in many ways. I've been drumming my whole life and am thankful and blessed to still have excellent hearing. My eye sight is a different story, lol. From playing in bands, running sound and being around the loudness, I know what goes on at a concert setting from the stage set up, behind stage effects, the front special effects, speaker and amp placements, etc. Lot of bands who have money like to use indoor pyrotechnics. I worry because when watching a band while singing along to the songs and groovin to the music, we dont know when those pyrotechnics are going to blast off. We dont know if loud sirens will be played, and if any other loud bangs will go off. We dont see the effects coming and we are not told. The sudden shock could affect someone's health from getting scared, and maybe having a stroke or other attacks. People could pass out from the noise, and the very bright flashing lites. I know that some people have suffered and orhers have died. Some bands have been sued. We need to be pretty much in great health to enjoy a rock concert. Some heavy metal, grunge bands make people sign waivers. GOD BLESS.
@@glenpolen5562 Hi. Yep! I’m relatively well.. I’m on medication for AF now. The last concerts I attended was Beth Hart,Richard Hawley and Fontaines DC few years back.. It was the Fontaines gig that caused me to feel unwell.. Heart rate was everywhere until day after. I’m going to be very selective in future about the band and also venue acoustically.
@@Oystersgetclamydia Hey, It's great to hear back from you. Im very happy to hear that you are doing well, staying healthy, and keeping the ole heart pumping. Amen. I just said a prayer for you when i read your reply. I forgot to mention in my first comment that many cities can't afford to pay the bands because of how big their show might be. Some cities just don't want to pay bands because of their budgets. Then there are the cities that just dont want certain bands to be around because of what people do before and after the shows . A lot of venues can't afford bands, and some dont have the room for fans. There are capacity limits, and many bands prefer to play the smaller clubs. Bands can't bring their whole show to smaller venues for safety reasons, but a larger facility mite allow minimal pyrotechnics inside, and even then, people get hurt. The sound can get so deafening in a smaller venue and hurt people. All clubs and venues must obide by noise laws, and can by sued by the city and if someone gets hurt. A band should also be required to have a certain stage volume. Some sound teams use the same settings from an arena show and at a smaller venue. They might adjust the highs and lows. Most clubs do it right, and respect is given all around. But, things can still happen. I would think that a persons hearing could suffer from a small venue compared to arena shows, but that is not always true. Plus, we are all different. My sensitivity could be worse than the person standing next to me. I remember being at many concerts, and no matter what section i was in, my ears would be ringing when i left and got home. I know this has happened at other events, but I remember being at a concert, and my ears were ringing bad and I got a little confused and almost lost my balance and fell over. I had to clear my head and sit down. Please be safe, and take care. Enjoy the music.
@@glenpolen5562 Yep! I remember those gigs very well.. I’ve seen Black Sabbath in the 70’s .. My ears are ringing to this day 😁 I’ve a massive vinyl and cd/dvd collection that I’m going to dust off and enjoy..from my armchair. Thank you for your prayers~ I appreciate that. God bless too. 👍🏻
I remember that show! I always looked forward to his and Doug Henning's specials on TV. Finally got to see Copperfield in person many years ago at the San Jose Arena, and it was a great experience. Cheers!
Why? TV nowadays became more interesting. Of course in different countries situation can be different, as example I stopped to watch Hollywood movies near 10 years ago, incredible madness and non stop propaganda, even more than at old times :/
Well networks are dead. I find a lot of great stuff through Hulu/Netflix/Amazon and many other streaming services. You just have to dig harder to find good stuff, but you have more options than you ever had before.
@@Traitorman.14.3 That is still better than only showing you what some people in power want. The problem is education and missing critical thinking. You have to question yourself everyday.
I remember that too (and he even said some but not all of the audience were actors because it was the TV audience he was fooling, not the live audience) but I've also seen other versions of the trick that were much faster, lacked the buildup, the music and the helicopter to mess with perspective. This means the platform would have needed to move fast enough to be noticed, requiring the entire audience to be in on it. Which tells me Copperfield put in far more time and effort to make the illusion work, not just for the TV audience, but for the live audience.
Thanks for the video. I was big into magic from the mid 70s through the mid 80s, and David Copperfield and Doug Henning were the two biggest magicians of that time. Henning made an elephant disappear in the first season, then walked through a brick wall in the second season of his television series, Doug Henning's World of Magic. The elephant was the big one until Copperfield did his Statue of Liberty vanishing act.
I remember watching it and the next day at school our science teacher explained it, but he told us it was optical illusion of lighting and when David was on some talk show he slightly hinted on the turning of the stage.
He also hired actors to play some of the audience because he wasn’t trying to fool them, he was trying to fool you the tv viewer. There was a This American Life episode about this.
I live in Las Vegas, have worked in many stage shows. The audience is ALWAYS in on it. They also sign legal papers which make them liable if they reveal secrets. Copperfield is not a very nice person, nasty dude.
I do find it funny that you said this trick worked in 1983 but wouldn't work now... like people are more informed now than they were then. I think they are informed in a different manner than then, but it's not like good magic doesn't still amaze people.
I’m not saying people are smarter now, we just have more technology. If someone tried this today, there would be drones watching from every angle and it would be exposed on social media before the special even aired.
Yeah and there'd be some fruitcake in the audience swearing that the aliens did it and refuting any evidence to the contrary as FBI schills "upholding the secret agreement the govt had with them" You know I'm right 🤣
@@catzkeet4860 what you're saying would makes sense... if you weren't a clone that fixed the election... to help the reptile people convince us that the Earth isn't flat because you know the moon landing was faked!
Most people I knew shrugged it off as a TV trick. I remember talking about this at school after it aired - and no one I knew was impressed. The main two theories were that the audience was in on it, or he just used mirrors. I always thought Henning was far more entertaining than Copperfield. 😎
@@TheTruthKiwi oh, ok then, if that’s the case the whole thing was just on a bunch of wheels, or on a single rotating disk. I think with some strong materials it still might not be *super* expensive
@@Bruhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. And to make it safe and apparently hidden from the audience/viewers? I don't know, I'm just assuming that a large, complex mechanism would be quite pricey. I may be wrong.
One problem wuth the moving stage theory. Again realiziing that the statue CANNOT move. If the audience "moved" then the statue would have vanished from the part of the audience that was centerline, to the part of the audience that is left or right. The statue can't move, the illusion that the statue was "behind" one of the pillars, is just that an "illusion" caused by field of view. Secondly, always accept the easiest explanation first. All that you would have had to do was put a pitch black curtain behind the silvery one, raise both, but lower only the front silvery one at the end.
A lot of people don't consider "camera tricks" to be "real illusions." But it's a matter of opinion. Some of the very first illusions performed on film just used camera trickery.
This isn't really a camera trick. No illusion was processed in the cameras. The cameras saw what the audience saw. When people talk of camera tricks - they're usually referring to something that appears different to those viewing live as opposed to those viewing on camera or some other manipulation due to how it's filmed. Here - the camera saw what the audience saw (even if they were in on it . . ). It's really no more a camera trick than any other trick filmed from the front as opposed to angles that reveal the secrets.
This guy is a real magician and he masterfully exploits the art of misdirection. If you notice, he goes out of his way to say multiple times that there's no way the statue of liberty could actually vanish and then he provides an elaborate explanation why. DON'T BE FOOLED, PEOPLE! That's just what they want you to think, but I'm more convinced now than ever that the statue really did disappear in 1983. Pretty cool!
So i watched this special and i distinctly remember that Copperfield had positioned models around the statue with a camera taking a pic every few seconds and the pictures showed the statue in one snap and then gone in the next. I'm just curious, was that part of the illusion done with this same moving stage?
Watched it live and actually wasn't impressed BECAUSE of the forced camera views - I remember they had a helicopter and boats I think, but when the "trick" started, we were forced to watch everything from the same perspective as those on the stage. I mean, you already knew he didn't move the statue, but forcing the TV audience to view it from the stage too, was a bit of a giveaway.
I remember watching this when I was a kid, even then I knew he didn't really make it disappear, I just figured because of the weird camera view how to do some kind of mirror, and everybody in the audience was in on it
If you need the entire audience to be in on a trick, no magician would do it. It's okay to stooge a few people who are directly involved with the trick, but not the entire audience.
@@bipolarminddroppings at this point in my life, I never say someone wouldn't do anything, under the right conditions anyone will whatever it takes for fame or money
This sort of “magic” just never struck me as interesting.. it’s too big of a trick to be believable.. Personally, Ive always been more impressed with slight of hand card tricks than over produced gimmicks.
I saw a live show. I remember a lot of very bright flashes of light throughout the performance. There was a very bright flash every time something disappeared or reappeared. I thought that was kind of cheap, but I will say that if Copperfield and the other performers didn't have their movements just perfect, then the flashes wouldn't have helped pull it off.
I remember watching this as a 4 yr old and thinking it was mirrors. So 4yr old me was wrong but I thought any magic tricks was done with mirrors.... and probably smoke.
It's half past 2 in the morning, I should be asleep. But then UA-cam recommends the answer to a question I've been wondering about since before I could pee standing up. Must see TV right here.
I was there, and I noticed. And I noticed the angle was different, because when you there you could see the sky, stars clouds etc… and I could tell we moved.
Part of me imagines the "imperceptibly rotating" stage violently shuddering and vibrating enough that drinks were sloshing around with people being thrown to the side like the Enterprise being attacked by Klingons then cutting to the amazed crowd as the Statue "disappeared." As the little old lady is being interviewed on camera following the show there's someone just off camera having a neck brace placed on them to treat their whiplash.
You could probably do the trick today by having a high def video screen displaying what you think is the Statue of Liberty, and then just switches to a video with the Statue edited out. The ones they use at Lucasfilm and Disney to film infront of "real" backgrounds are pretty convincing if you're far enough away.
I greatly frustrated ChatGPT (as frustrated as an AI can get atm) having a conversation with it regarding whether or not the people who were doing the Statue of Liberty tour at the time that David Copperfield made it disappear were given a refund since they didn't get to see the statue...
I heard your expln is wrong(?) I heard from another YTber that the floor didn`t move they just turned the statue lights off then when the curtain went up the lights on the two pillars turned on in the direction of the audience making it even harder for them to see. IDK but most talk about the floor moving. Take note: the trick can only be performed at night (cue dramatic music)
I'm assuming for such a famous event being shown live on TV crowds of people must have lined Battery Park. Didn't word get out from them that the statue never disappeared? A rival TV company could have set up cameras there.
Given so much of what's on screen is an illusion, I expect there's an informal agreement between the various companies to not draw attention to how a rival is doing something. Just a guess but I'd be surprised if there wasn't. The kind of thing that won't be written anywhere, just an understanding to not draw attention to the tricks used.
The walk through the Wall of China was an under-and-over gimmick. The one where he was sawn in two involved a second man under the "legs" half of the table. Both of these revelations can be found on UA-cam.
@@zabadazidit Can you explain how the magician who visited my daycare when I was like 5yo made M&M’s appear out of nowhere? 😂 The best audience a magician can have is little kids because they think it’s real. At least we did back then, little kids nowadays aren’t so naïve.
@@LuckyCharms777 Sure thing. The magician had a bag of M&Ms concealed behind his hand and used it the way other magicians would make cards "appear" out of nowhere. It's a sleight of hand trick that is easy to duplicate.
@@LuckyCharms777I’ve been showing my 5-year-old nephew some of my magic tricks with every day objects and he’s always shocked. I bought him a magic kit but not sure if I should give it to him yet. Not sure when I will tell him that magic is just mind tricks and it’s all just an illusion.
Can you explain why this wouldn't work in 2023? Are we as people just more observant or more distracted and therefore would be more focused on things going on around us?
Ha! thank you. I had forgotten about this. Back then we were all so naive and anything like this was big news. All we had was network TV, Radio and printed media.
A friend of mine worked the set of that optical illusion, and he told me that all they did was use a black curtian to hide the statue. He never said anything about a moving stage.
We cannot see the background behind the people in any video I know of. I "guess" there was a small circular wall on the stage, just high enough to mask far buildings.
Okay, now explain how he flew around the stage by flapping his wings, while flying through several hoops then into a terrarium-like box to show that wires weren't involved.
My first thought now was that it was Mozart's Requiem that is critical for performing something radical. At the end of the video this assumption is confirmed.
You missed the most important misdirection. He had a helicopter with a bright spotlight shining on the statue for a considerable length of time during which he apologized to the audience and said they were having "technical problems." Eventually the curtain came across and the stage began to revolve imperceptibly slowly. However the helicopter moved in sync with the stage. The beam of light appeared to be stationary in relation to the stage. When the curtain was lifted they saw the helicopter in the same place but with no statue. The beam of light also helped black out the background. Otherwise the audience would have seen a different skyline. Pure genius!
Interesting, KingRobert. That was one slick chopper pilot who was able to sync up the light with the stage from what I assume would have been at 1,000 feet AGL.
@@acreguy3156 Slick magician too!
@@kingrobert1st Agreed! When I first saw that when he did the trick, I couldn't believe he was even from this planet.
He also had floating lights in the water if i remember, to replicate the ones shining up onto the statue.
@@countsmyth Well executed plan!
Figuring out how a magic trick is done is far more interesting than the trick itself.
But it does kinda take the 'magic' out of magic tho'
@@michaelbarton4787 not really. We know magic isn't real and it's just an illusion. So the fun is in figuring out how it was done.
Not really to me anyway.
A trick like this is just a nothing burger, there is no skill involved. But seeing people who are really good at sleight of hand perform is really impressive, perhaps even more so when you know how it's done.
@@finkelmanaI agree with you. Watching magic tricks aren’t as fun because I’m more interested in how they did it vs what they did
I remember this vividly as a child. Not sure I thought much on how it was done. I then ate spaghettiO's for dinner. The following day I rode my bike 4 miles.
I remember it vaguely (I was five)...can't recall what we had for dinner!
Yeah - I thought it was lame as well. Meatloaf and mashed potatoes for my family. 😋
I’m just not enthralled by illusionists either. We had pizza that night. Can’t remember what I did the next day, but I’m sure a bmx was involved.
Haha it’s cool you remember that
Cool! As a kid, I loved watching David Copperfield. I knew it was all tricks, but the experience was what I enjoyed because I didn't know how he pulled it off. For me, it doesn't change my enjoyment to know.
I was fortunate enough to see him the last time I was in Vegas. He still puts on a great show and I'd definitely recommend it to anybody who has the opportunity to see one of the all time greats. There's a reason why he was the first billionaire magician. He puts on a spectacular show. I was somewhat surprised to be able to get such good tickets the day of the show. But, then again he does shows throughout the year and has been for many years.
I recall starting to watch it on tv, but the buildup was so interminably long, it was really tedious waiting for the trick, that we just changed the channel…. We had previously wasted an hour or two waiting for Capone’s safe to be opened just to see there as nothing in it…. was a common approach on shows back then…
He used a giant “Lazy Susan”
pretty much
close but the actual secret was revealed a few years back in Ghostbusters 2. Copperfield had his staff spray the statue with pink slime and it merely walked a few steps away during the show. Magic!!!
Egon: My parents didn't believe in toys.
Ray: You mean you never even had a Slinky?
Egon: We had part of a Slinky. But I straightened it.
Those David Copperfield Specials were a must back in the 80´s, I remember there were 6 or 8 of them and he always performed something "impossible" at the end of the show. Back then it was insane and we had no idea how he did it, but today it´s so easy to understand how everything was done. I´m not gonna lie I kind of like the fact that now I know how he did all of those tricks, back then I really wanted to know how he could do such amazing tricks but it was impossible to get that information.
Used to prefer Doug Hennings specials.
@@gbhxuThey were all good and fun to watch...
i remember the great wall of shina the most. that was awesome
@@kevinpittman2517 Indeed - not too tricky to work out how he did that one tho'
And even today for some reason I still remember those specials were always sponsored by Kraft
Great video.
I was impressed back then, and years later, I had heard that the stage moved and he had the bass turned up in the music so the audience did not realize what was going on.
Very loud music with a heavy bass can make people confused and even psyched out a little.
It can also throw off your balance .
So the stage movement would feel normal to the audience, like you greatly mentioned.
Thanks Dan.
That helps to explain why I felt unwell at rock concerts.. I have atrial fibrillation..I’m sure the bass altered my heart rate..
@Oystersgetclamydia
Hello, I hope that you are doing well. Have you been to any more concerts? If so, I hope you got thru it safely and took precautions. I wonder what precautions you could take. Same with others who have other health issues. I agree that the loud bass and other loud sounds that are mixed in at a concert could affect our health and cause issues, but especially if we have any on- going issues. Im sure the loud noise could affect many people in many ways. I've been drumming my whole life and am thankful and blessed to still have excellent hearing. My eye sight is a different story, lol.
From playing in bands, running sound and being around the loudness, I know what goes on at a concert setting from the stage set up, behind stage effects, the front special effects, speaker and amp placements, etc.
Lot of bands who have money like to use indoor pyrotechnics.
I worry because when watching a band while singing along to the songs and groovin to the music, we dont know when those pyrotechnics are going to blast off. We dont know if loud sirens will be played, and if any other loud bangs will go off.
We dont see the effects coming and we are not told. The sudden shock could affect someone's health from getting scared, and maybe having a stroke or other attacks. People could pass out from the noise, and the very bright flashing lites.
I know that some people have suffered and orhers have died. Some bands have been sued.
We need to be pretty much in great health to enjoy a rock concert.
Some heavy metal, grunge bands make people sign waivers.
GOD BLESS.
@@glenpolen5562
Hi. Yep! I’m relatively well.. I’m on medication for AF now. The last concerts I attended was Beth Hart,Richard Hawley and Fontaines DC few years back.. It was the Fontaines gig that caused me to feel unwell.. Heart rate was everywhere until day after.
I’m going to be very selective in future about the band and also venue acoustically.
@@Oystersgetclamydia Hey, It's great to hear back from you. Im very happy to hear that you are doing well, staying healthy, and keeping the ole heart pumping.
Amen. I just said a prayer for you when i read your reply.
I forgot to mention in my first comment that many cities can't afford to pay the bands because of how big their show might be. Some cities just don't want to pay bands because of their budgets. Then there are the cities that just dont want certain bands to be around because of what people do before and after the shows .
A lot of venues can't afford bands, and some dont have the room for fans.
There are capacity limits, and many bands prefer to play the smaller clubs.
Bands can't bring their whole show to smaller venues for safety reasons, but a larger facility mite allow minimal pyrotechnics inside, and even then, people get hurt.
The sound can get so deafening in a smaller venue and hurt people.
All clubs and venues must obide by noise laws, and can by sued by the city and if someone gets hurt.
A band should also be required to have a certain stage volume.
Some sound teams use the same settings from an arena show and at a smaller venue.
They might adjust the highs and lows.
Most clubs do it right, and respect is given all around.
But, things can still happen. I would think that a persons hearing could suffer from a small venue compared to arena shows, but that is not always true.
Plus, we are all different.
My sensitivity could be worse than the person standing next to me.
I remember being at many concerts, and no matter what section i was in, my ears would be ringing when i left and got home.
I know this has happened at other events, but I remember being at a concert, and my ears were ringing bad and I got a little confused and almost lost my balance and fell over.
I had to clear my head and sit down.
Please be safe, and take care.
Enjoy the music.
@@glenpolen5562
Yep! I remember those gigs very well.. I’ve seen Black Sabbath in the 70’s .. My ears are ringing to this day 😁
I’ve a massive vinyl and cd/dvd collection that I’m going to dust off and enjoy..from my armchair. Thank you for your prayers~ I appreciate that. God bless too. 👍🏻
That's gold! I remember that stunt but never knew the trick. Great video dude!
I remember that show! I always looked forward to his and Doug Henning's specials on TV. Finally got to see Copperfield in person many years ago at the San Jose Arena, and it was a great experience. Cheers!
Ty for posting ! I was 8 and rember watching.i was mesmerized 😮!
As a kid i always looked forward to a David Copperfield special. Tv is terrible nowadays.
Why? TV nowadays became more interesting.
Of course in different countries situation can be different, as example I stopped to watch Hollywood movies near 10 years ago, incredible madness and non stop propaganda, even more than at old times :/
@@juliap.5375 TV is dead/dying. We are in the Internet era. You can choose what you watch, not what your masters want you to watch. Be free.
Well networks are dead. I find a lot of great stuff through Hulu/Netflix/Amazon and many other streaming services. You just have to dig harder to find good stuff, but you have more options than you ever had before.
@@goku445
Problem is with the choice on the internet is that there is an awful lot of confirmation bias.
@@Traitorman.14.3 That is still better than only showing you what some people in power want.
The problem is education and missing critical thinking.
You have to question yourself everyday.
This was shown on TV on "Magician Secrets Revealed" about 20-25 years ago. Rumor has it that the audience was in on it too.
most likely
If the audience were in on it they could have moved the platform faster and wouldn't have needed the bass music.
I remember that too (and he even said some but not all of the audience were actors because it was the TV audience he was fooling, not the live audience) but I've also seen other versions of the trick that were much faster, lacked the buildup, the music and the helicopter to mess with perspective. This means the platform would have needed to move fast enough to be noticed, requiring the entire audience to be in on it. Which tells me Copperfield put in far more time and effort to make the illusion work, not just for the TV audience, but for the live audience.
That's why TV magic never meant anything to me. I have no reason to think they're telling t he truth if they pinky promise no editing tricks.
I watched this on TV in 1983! Thanks for the explanation.
Egon moved the statue of liberty with his NES controller. Well done Egon. Well done.
And, the happy goo.
I remember watching this live on tv. Ive wondered how it was done ever since. thank you!
Thanks for the video. I was big into magic from the mid 70s through the mid 80s, and David Copperfield and Doug Henning were the two biggest magicians of that time. Henning made an elephant disappear in the first season, then walked through a brick wall in the second season of his television series, Doug Henning's World of Magic. The elephant was the big one until Copperfield did his Statue of Liberty vanishing act.
I watched this live. It was amazing!
Cool thanks for sharing knowledge freely
I remember watching it and the next day at school our science teacher explained it, but he told us it was optical illusion of lighting and when David was on some talk show he slightly hinted on the turning of the stage.
I figured it was a 2nd black curtain that mimicked the night sky.
That's what I thought it was as well.
@@martabachynsky8545no. The arrangment of light make it disappear
hade the same idea
He also hired actors to play some of the audience because he wasn’t trying to fool them, he was trying to fool you the tv viewer. There was a This American Life episode about this.
I’ve always heard that the audience was in on it.
I’ve always wondered if they were. I think the effect would have worked either way, but for a live TV event, better to play it safe.
I live in Las Vegas, have worked in many stage shows. The audience is ALWAYS in on it. They also sign legal papers which make them liable if they reveal secrets. Copperfield is not a very nice person, nasty dude.
they are! many times just staged actors!
No he put it in his pocket
@@gradywilson9213 Is it possible for someone to not know the floor is moving under them if it's moving slowly and there's multiple distractions?
I always wondered how he did that. Thanks for posting this.
This would still work in 2023. People are still simpletons.
Very cool idea he did 😊👏👏😊😊👏
That is pretty darn clever!!
I do find it funny that you said this trick worked in 1983 but wouldn't work now... like people are more informed now than they were then. I think they are informed in a different manner than then, but it's not like good magic doesn't still amaze people.
I’m not saying people are smarter now, we just have more technology. If someone tried this today, there would be drones watching from every angle and it would be exposed on social media before the special even aired.
Anyone's phone would pick up that the direction they're facing changed. @@MindBlownMagicIllusion
Yeah and there'd be some fruitcake in the audience swearing that the aliens did it and refuting any evidence to the contrary as FBI schills "upholding the secret agreement the govt had with them"
You know I'm right 🤣
@@catzkeet4860 what you're saying would makes sense... if you weren't a clone that fixed the election... to help the reptile people convince us that the Earth isn't flat because you know the moon landing was faked!
@@catzkeet4860 Back in 1983 there'd have been some fruitcake in the audience. In 2023 the whole audience would be fruitcakes.
Most people I knew shrugged it off as a TV trick. I remember talking about this at school after it aired - and no one I knew was impressed. The main two theories were that the audience was in on it, or he just used mirrors. I always thought Henning was far more entertaining than Copperfield. 😎
Or since it's showing as night time, a black screen
Haha people always say “mirrors” as the default explanation for these stunts. “Oh yeah he probably used mirrors.”
Doug Henning was more entertaining but for the wrong reasons.😆
@@Ken-fh4jc They never explain how the mirrors are used though lol
No one thought he really made it vanish
That must've been a hell of an expensive custom made stage
Considering that they were right next to the Statue of Liberty, I’m pretty sure it was on a boat. It’s pretty easy and cheap to move a boat
@@Bruhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. The stage was on Liberty Island apparently.
@@TheTruthKiwi oh, ok then, if that’s the case the whole thing was just on a bunch of wheels, or on a single rotating disk. I think with some strong materials it still might not be *super* expensive
@@Bruhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. And to make it safe and apparently hidden from the audience/viewers? I don't know, I'm just assuming that a large, complex mechanism would be quite pricey. I may be wrong.
I remember watching this live here in Finland.
Good times.
I understand his explanation but how did he make the Lego statue disappear during his explanation.
Very good. Ty
I remember that! I was like 12 at the time. Holy smokes after 40 years it's amazing to finally know.
I remember watching this as a 13 year old, and wondering did he move the stage
I remember that televised!
I swear I heard the audience was in on it. Love learning about this
Now that I haven't seen before. (Not just the explanation, but also the use of the word "vanish" as a transitive verb. 😀)
One problem wuth the moving stage theory. Again realiziing that the statue CANNOT move. If the audience "moved" then the statue would have vanished from the part of the audience that was centerline, to the part of the audience that is left or right. The statue can't move, the illusion that the statue was "behind" one of the pillars, is just that an "illusion" caused by field of view. Secondly, always accept the easiest explanation first. All that you would have had to do was put a pitch black curtain behind the silvery one, raise both, but lower only the front silvery one at the end.
The good old days without drones, social media, ubiquitous cameras, internet...
I remember watching that live as a kid.
thank you.
A lot of people don't consider "camera tricks" to be "real illusions." But it's a matter of opinion. Some of the very first illusions performed on film just used camera trickery.
This isn't really a camera trick. No illusion was processed in the cameras. The cameras saw what the audience saw. When people talk of camera tricks - they're usually referring to something that appears different to those viewing live as opposed to those viewing on camera or some other manipulation due to how it's filmed. Here - the camera saw what the audience saw (even if they were in on it . . ). It's really no more a camera trick than any other trick filmed from the front as opposed to angles that reveal the secrets.
1983? I remember seeing this on television! That's nuts.
It is still there. I recently saw it!
Thank you
Im 47 now in 2023. I remember watching that on TV when I was a kid and it blew my mind. 😂
I watched this live as a kid and my dad was like " he rotated the staff, phiff. And walked away. 😂
And your dad was right! 😄
did your dad then say he's going out for some cigarettes and never came back?
bawahahahahahahahahahahaah!!!
Exactly same story, but it was my cousin 😂
Plot twist, that's Copperfields son.
@@scottsmith7203 no. He sd he was going to bang some whore and left. What's up brother. 😭
This guy is a real magician and he masterfully exploits the art of misdirection. If you notice, he goes out of his way to say multiple times that there's no way the statue of liberty could actually vanish and then he provides an elaborate explanation why. DON'T BE FOOLED, PEOPLE! That's just what they want you to think, but I'm more convinced now than ever that the statue really did disappear in 1983. Pretty cool!
I choose to believe 😂 what I don’t believe are these people explaining it😂
Con artist*
So i watched this special and i distinctly remember that Copperfield had positioned models around the statue with a camera taking a pic every few seconds and the pictures showed the statue in one snap and then gone in the next. I'm just curious, was that part of the illusion done with this same moving stage?
Watched it live and actually wasn't impressed BECAUSE of the forced camera views - I remember they had a helicopter and boats I think, but when the "trick" started, we were forced to watch everything from the same perspective as those on the stage. I mean, you already knew he didn't move the statue, but forcing the TV audience to view it from the stage too, was a bit of a giveaway.
I remember watching this live.i was 11 at the time.
I remember watching this when I was a kid, even then I knew he didn't really make it disappear, I just figured because of the weird camera view how to do some kind of mirror, and everybody in the audience was in on it
If you need the entire audience to be in on a trick, no magician would do it. It's okay to stooge a few people who are directly involved with the trick, but not the entire audience.
@@bipolarminddroppings at this point in my life, I never say someone wouldn't do anything, under the right conditions anyone will whatever it takes for fame or money
This sort of “magic” just never struck me as interesting.. it’s too big of a trick to be believable.. Personally, Ive always been more impressed with slight of hand card tricks than over produced gimmicks.
@@bipolarminddroppings Don't forget this was televised around the world, in the grand scheme of things, the audience where just props themselves.
I saw a live show. I remember a lot of very bright flashes of light throughout the performance. There was a very bright flash every time something disappeared or reappeared. I thought that was kind of cheap, but I will say that if Copperfield and the other performers didn't have their movements just perfect, then the flashes wouldn't have helped pull it off.
How do you explain the searchlights going through the statue of liberty pedestal without the statue on top?
Once the perspective was changed, the search lights were just shined through the open space.
... do you think it was real?
I remember watching this as a 4 yr old and thinking it was mirrors. So 4yr old me was wrong but I thought any magic tricks was done with mirrors.... and probably smoke.
It was very cool at the time. He did some amazing stuff.
I remember watching it was very impressive
It's half past 2 in the morning, I should be asleep. But then UA-cam recommends the answer to a question I've been wondering about since before I could pee standing up. Must see TV right here.
Good stuff.
Thanks.
The audience was in on it.
I was there, and I noticed. And I noticed the angle was different, because when you there you could see the sky, stars clouds etc… and I could tell we moved.
Part of me imagines the "imperceptibly rotating" stage violently shuddering and vibrating enough that drinks were sloshing around with people being thrown to the side like the Enterprise being attacked by Klingons then cutting to the amazed crowd as the Statue "disappeared." As the little old lady is being interviewed on camera following the show there's someone just off camera having a neck brace placed on them to treat their whiplash.
You could probably do the trick today by having a high def video screen displaying what you think is the Statue of Liberty, and then just switches to a video with the Statue edited out. The ones they use at Lucasfilm and Disney to film infront of "real" backgrounds are pretty convincing if you're far enough away.
No, fool. How would that even work? Fiol.
I remember seeing it on tv. But, I'd forgotten how he did it.
Interesting! At the time I thought they just maybe shut the spot lights off since it was at night time.
Having all the audience in on the trick helps...
What in the world do you mean this trick wouldn't work today? That is one of the most bizarre statements I've ever heard someone make.
Because drone cams and phone cams would be pointed at the statue and platform showing how it was all done.
@@mrcydonia This comment is too silly for me to respond to (other than this).
I greatly frustrated ChatGPT (as frustrated as an AI can get atm) having a conversation with it regarding whether or not the people who were doing the Statue of Liberty tour at the time that David Copperfield made it disappear were given a refund since they didn't get to see the statue...
who else was impressed when he made the lego statue disappear??
Cool, how about his Grand Canyon levitation?
God bless.
I remember that!!
Copperfield was the best money I spent on a show in Vegas. He appeared right in front of me. It’s nuts.
His nuts appeared right in front of you?
Which theater did you go to?
This one seemed pretty obvious to me the first time I saw it. He didn't even need to move the stage, just the panels on the side and the camera angle.
So how’s he going to make the moon disappear??
Since the moon is made of cheese, David Doucherfield will just eat it all.
buuuuuuuuurp.
Anyone can make the moon disappear. They Just have to pull their pants back up.
They ordered two but one got lost in shipping! 😂
I went there last week it was still there, think its a wind up
Did it at night. Had helicopters. Could they have had 2 separate helicopters drop an opaque curtain in front of the statues?
I heard your expln is wrong(?) I heard from another YTber that the floor didn`t move they just turned the statue lights off then when the curtain went up the lights on the two pillars turned on in the direction of the audience making it even harder for them to see. IDK but most talk about the floor moving. Take note: the trick can only be performed at night (cue dramatic music)
I'm assuming for such a famous event being shown live on TV crowds of people must have lined Battery Park. Didn't word get out from them that the statue never disappeared? A rival TV company could have set up cameras there.
Given so much of what's on screen is an illusion, I expect there's an informal agreement between the various companies to not draw attention to how a rival is doing something.
Just a guess but I'd be surprised if there wasn't. The kind of thing that won't be written anywhere, just an understanding to not draw attention to the tricks used.
You sure that was back in 83? I thought it was sometime in the 90’s
1:08 how did he do that???
Impressive. Can you explain how he made the plane on the ground disappear?
It flew away in stealth mode
Good !
Wouldn't it be easier to just put a mirror between the pillars and rotate that, instead of all the entire audience?
You’re closer to the correct solution than the explanation in this video
And who would be able to manufacture a 150 foot long mirror? Westinghouse?
Thank you!.Will you please show how we walked through The Wall Of China?. And the one he was cut in half?
The walk through the Wall of China was an under-and-over gimmick. The one where he was sawn in two involved a second man under the "legs" half of the table. Both of these revelations can be found on UA-cam.
@@zabadazidit
Can you explain how the magician who visited my daycare when I was like 5yo made M&M’s appear out of nowhere? 😂
The best audience a magician can have is little kids because they think it’s real. At least we did back then, little kids nowadays aren’t so naïve.
@@LuckyCharms777 Sure thing. The magician had a bag of M&Ms concealed behind his hand and used it the way other magicians would make cards "appear" out of nowhere. It's a sleight of hand trick that is easy to duplicate.
This is EXACTLY how he did the Great Wall illusion: ua-cam.com/video/wYFdT8UfmXg/v-deo.htmlsi=SMGw60aXhCivSaqs
@@LuckyCharms777I’ve been showing my 5-year-old nephew some of my magic tricks with every day objects and he’s always shocked. I bought him a magic kit but not sure if I should give it to him yet. Not sure when I will tell him that magic is just mind tricks and it’s all just an illusion.
Damn has it been that long?
How did D.C. make a Hummer disappear from the top of a hotel in Vegas . ?
Can you explain why this wouldn't work in 2023? Are we as people just more observant or more distracted and therefore would be more focused on things going on around us?
So how did people watching from outside the platform not notice it was moving?
Ha! thank you. I had forgotten about this. Back then we were all so naive and anything like this was big news. All we had was network TV, Radio and printed media.
1:30
Here you move the stage only, not the audience. You should have placed the camera one the red platform.
1983, back when we were told you had to wait 45 minutes after eating to go swimming
A friend of mine worked the set of that optical illusion, and he told me that all they did was use a black curtian to hide the statue. He never said anything about a moving stage.
too bad he couldnt make the Epstein files disappear.
Hundreds of people? Show me one screenshot of hundreds of people in that audience
Cool
But how did he account for the people not seeing buildings apparently moving in the background while the stage was being rotated?
We cannot see the background behind the people in any video I know of.
I "guess" there was a small circular wall on the stage, just high enough to mask far buildings.
Okay, now explain how he flew around the stage by flapping his wings, while flying through several hoops then into a terrarium-like box to show that wires weren't involved.
My first thought now was that it was Mozart's Requiem that is critical for performing something radical. At the end of the video this assumption is confirmed.