Von Triers' scenes are good dynamically. But statically Tarkovsky wins with no doubts. Just pause any scene on a random point and you'll get a great photography.
WOW, i just cannot believe how this video shows at least to my eye, how great Tarkovsky's work was. It was miles miles ahead of anyone with the images and feelings, ideas and their realisation, it was just pure joy to see his images here, so inspiring - just take a look at 4:34" like Vermeer's painting. thank you for this comparison. It shows how one can learn, be inspired, grow and recreate in a new way from Andrei Tarkovsky.
It’s as ridiculous and superficial as it is impossible to take anyone seriously that compares von Trier to Tarkovsky. These are facile, shallow aesthetics. There is no relationship. If von Trier hadn’t mentioned his admiration and affixed a dedication to AT on a film (which was itself absurd as a “tribute”), there would be no comparisons made to Tarkovsky. It’s clear von Trier has encouraged these comparisons in hints and allusions for decades but it’s as perverse as it is ludicrous. Von Trier has never had the confidence to be his own man, which he could and should do. All of his work is pastiche, owing much to many of his heros, be it Dreyer, AT, Fassbinder, et al., and that’s fine, but that’s what he could be proud of, that that’s the sort of artist he is and great at it. Tarkovsky was a singular artist, carving out a world that owed more to an immersion of a literary mind transformed into cinema. Von Trier’s worlds were and are born in the cinemas of others, which underscores their limitations.
I agree mostly with what you said mr Lars artistic, movie form and nature based on his admiration with other greats without attaching to his own existinsial experience ..however dude it's tarkovsky.. cenima Messiah
@@dadapatchara Hagiography aside, the kernel of the issue is that whomever his cinematic ‘messiah’ happened to be for any given project, or as a whole, there is the shadow of a massive cinematic carrot dangling ahead of his own efforts, be it AT, or R.W. Fassbinder, et al., and it’s very present and obvious if one has an interest or a bit of a handle on the history of Eastern/Western European and Russo cinemas, not that his references are obscure, actually. It can be glaring. By contrast, it’s interesting because Wenders is a huge Tarkovsky admirer but his work was too independently driven by numerous cinematic and literary resources to ever become an acolyte of any one filmmaker.
Von Triers' scenes are good dynamically. But statically Tarkovsky wins with no doubts. Just pause any scene on a random point and you'll get a great photography.
Tarkovsky movies are on a different level, they have a soul, pure art, just watch for example *Andrei Rublev.*
Could say a word for quite some time after watching that film ,I was speechless
WOW, i just cannot believe how this video shows at least to my eye, how great Tarkovsky's work was. It was miles miles ahead of anyone with the images and feelings, ideas and their realisation, it was just pure joy to see his images here, so inspiring - just take a look at 4:34" like Vermeer's painting. thank you for this comparison. It shows how one can learn, be inspired, grow and recreate in a new way from Andrei Tarkovsky.
For me both are giants of filmmaking. Each of them created their own distinctive style.
Influences Are Part Of All Of Us.Brilliant Video Post
Both of them are the greatest yet Andrey was the first and Lars has exclusive sense of humour
Beautiful editing, thank you ever so much.
Love + appreciate both!
compliments, great point of view and work
Tarkovsky over Von Trier, anyday.
Yes. Tarkovsky is maybe the greatest director of all time, but Von Trier is still great!
Von Trier is a fucking hack. He is so overrated it blows my mind away. Utter trash.
Tarkovsky fucking trash
why compare? who fucking cares
@@DomenTheChief no
İkiside harika yönetmenler video için teşekkürler 😊
Thanks, very interesting!
Lars says that his favorite director is Tarkovskiy and Tolstoy's War&Piece is a number one novel.
That was stupidly cool, tonight I happened to watch mirror then melancholia then I watch this yolo thank you
Harika...
Tebrikler...
teşekkür ederim.
Interesting!
iki babam yan yana
Təşəkkürlər Elshan Aliyev
Thx
Denmark has a royal family?
🖤
Imitation is knockout.
Von Trier: “I am the best film director in the world”
I understand Hitler.
@@lynchianfloydian451 cuz that’s what us nazis do
kusursuz ya
shame that Von Trier just makes insane films
Insanely good films, it's just the matter of opinion but I personally love his movies
Божий дар/яичница
bach bwv 244
Quarter cute fan three quarters leave the poor guy alone ffs
It’s as ridiculous and superficial as it is impossible to take anyone seriously that compares von Trier to Tarkovsky. These are facile, shallow aesthetics. There is no relationship. If von Trier hadn’t mentioned his admiration and affixed a dedication to AT on a film (which was itself absurd as a “tribute”), there would be no comparisons made to Tarkovsky. It’s clear von Trier has encouraged these comparisons in hints and allusions for decades but it’s as perverse as it is ludicrous. Von Trier has never had the confidence to be his own man, which he could and should do. All of his work is pastiche, owing much to many of his heros, be it Dreyer, AT, Fassbinder, et al., and that’s fine, but that’s what he could be proud of, that that’s the sort of artist he is and great at it. Tarkovsky was a singular artist, carving out a world that owed more to an immersion of a literary mind transformed into cinema. Von Trier’s worlds were and are born in the cinemas of others, which underscores their limitations.
I agree mostly with what you said mr Lars artistic, movie form and nature based on his admiration with other greats without attaching to his own existinsial experience ..however dude it's tarkovsky.. cenima Messiah
@@dadapatchara Hagiography aside, the kernel of the issue is that whomever his cinematic ‘messiah’ happened to be for any given project, or as a whole, there is the shadow of a massive cinematic carrot dangling ahead of his own efforts, be it AT, or R.W. Fassbinder, et al., and it’s very present and obvious if one has an interest or a bit of a handle on the history of Eastern/Western European and Russo cinemas, not that his references are obscure, actually. It can be glaring. By contrast, it’s interesting because Wenders is a huge Tarkovsky admirer but his work was too independently driven by numerous cinematic and literary resources to ever become an acolyte of any one filmmaker.
No way
цытатки
бред, снимать красивый окружающий мир медленной камерой явно не Торчковский придумал
Von Trier sucks!
your taste sucks