i like the rules, spurs competition, and clearly stated before. makes sense to split out the prizes. I guess if someone manages to get top 3 in both if one of their positions are higher i can see how theyd want to change, but its only a couple hundred total difference, and it would make a mess of reopening old slots and people having to change their practiced stategies, so i think its better to just lock in the first 3 records, 1 per person.
Dude, not letting a person win in both categories is like forbidding long jumpers from competing in and claiming medals in the triple jump. That is not fair; then the medals become meaningless and just participation trophies because they will know they didn´t really earn them.
No, it’s one competition with six winners, not two separate competitions with three winners. Nothing unfair about it. Just different ways to format a competition, hardly uncommon to have non-repeating winners in different category. Also, it’s not that serious.
@@TheHeadincharge No it isn´t, it is two different categories competed in on the same track. just because the 100meters and 110meters hurdles are competed in on the same piece of track doesn't mean it is the same competition. Shortcut and No Shortcut are not the same competition. You are right tho, it is not that serious but would you really feel like a winner if you got the one of the No Shortcut medals and there were at least three better times than yours? Participation medal.
hmm today i will watch wirtual for eight hour
Imagine that job description
9
Thank goodness, just in time for bed. Good ol' vroom-vroom ASMR.
i like the rules, spurs competition, and clearly stated before. makes sense to split out the prizes. I guess if someone manages to get top 3 in both if one of their positions are higher i can see how theyd want to change, but its only a couple hundred total difference, and it would make a mess of reopening old slots and people having to change their practiced stategies, so i think its better to just lock in the first 3 records, 1 per person.
"this is the wrong pyramid!" Thank you for taking the time to educate your audience xD
Wonderful video! :D
Im very bad at watching UA-cam for some reason. I wanted to watch a wirtual video, but it ended up taking me 8 hours
Now buy another one to connect it to the other one
Wirtual moment
Which moment? There are 9 hours of moments...
jnic with science sounds like me when people let me yap
After bailing at 5h i had to watch the conclusion 😂🎉
The background was disturbed by displeased pharaoh spirits
Why is his twitter empty? 🤔
He has his old account linked here. The current account is @Wirtual
@@trikronika Thanks!
What is this like to view to comment ratio bro 💀
Cause it was a livestream
@@nachogooda6129 ohhhhh
Dude, not letting a person win in both categories is like forbidding long jumpers from competing in and claiming medals in the triple jump. That is not fair; then the medals become meaningless and just participation trophies because they will know they didn´t really earn them.
No, it’s one competition with six winners, not two separate competitions with three winners. Nothing unfair about it. Just different ways to format a competition, hardly uncommon to have non-repeating winners in different category. Also, it’s not that serious.
@@TheHeadincharge No it isn´t, it is two different categories competed in on the same track. just because the 100meters and 110meters hurdles are competed in on the same piece of track doesn't mean it is the same competition. Shortcut and No Shortcut are not the same competition. You are right tho, it is not that serious but would you really feel like a winner if you got the one of the No Shortcut medals and there were at least three better times than yours? Participation medal.