This is a hard watch. It's like she throws her question or there and doesn't even bother sticking around for the answer, let's just set her up for the next softball.
As a media expert, I'm sure you're correct in your analysis, but this woman Abby is clearly mentally unbalanced. She looks like she's on the verge of a complete breakdown. She really shouldn't be giving interviews or held to a high standard. But solid points in general.
The premise that you have anything beyond a second grade-level understanding of grammar or punctuation is zero. Have you English'd before? No, you haven't. You're making a fool of yourself, period.
Classic Fallacy, instead of addressing the criticisms presented, just throw shit on the presenter. It's called "ad hominem". Thanks for giving us all a real example.
This is a hard watch. It's like she throws her question or there and doesn't even bother sticking around for the answer, let's just set her up for the next softball.
Seems less like a lesson of how not to interview and more a lesson on how not to lie
I probably disagree with you politically but really appreciate your POV and insight into the corporate media apparatus.
Wait... so she doesn't want any part in telling the truth?!? Figures
I would have bullied her for that haircut as well 😂😂
As a media expert, I'm sure you're correct in your analysis, but this woman Abby is clearly mentally unbalanced. She looks like she's on the verge of a complete breakdown. She really shouldn't be giving interviews or held to a high standard. But solid points in general.
Both of those women are despicable
Nicolle Wallace is not despicable. Cmon
Great analysis
How dare you attack a proud Jewish Trans woman!! You should be ashamed. Abby Grossberg is a hero to us all.
i had a feeling that was a trans woman, thank you for confirming. doesn’t change anything but worth knowing
Update: she just won $12 million.
❤
Ok what's the deal with her hair?
1993.
Omfg i just commented the same haha if she didnt want to be bullied she shouldnt have cut her hair like that😂😂
it is as dumb as using 25% of the screen on yourself covering up the content...
First one here👌🏻
Is this a defend Tucker Carlson video? Wtf, are you kidding?
Is your thinking really that black and white? Wtf, are you kidding!?
The premise that you have any idea what you're talking about is zero. Have you seen the indictment. No you haven't. Your Tucker groupie period.
The premise that you have anything beyond a second grade-level understanding of grammar or punctuation is zero. Have you English'd before? No, you haven't. You're making a fool of yourself, period.
So what about your credentials besides finger pointing?
Wow, this guy is pretending to dissect how well these two people did this interview as a way of coping and defending Tucker.
Classic Fallacy, instead of addressing the criticisms presented, just throw shit on the presenter. It's called "ad hominem". Thanks for giving us all a real example.