I think we so underestimate the quality of this because Federer doesn't dramatise his shots by grunting and Murray, too, is fairly quiet. Federer's footwork here is unbelievably fast, his game extraordinarily fluid and his decision making crisp as anything. He makes it look as though he intended the point to end that way all along.
Hi! I have been following your comments on a few videos now. You're quite insightful generally. I'm curious, what do you think of Roger's 2019 Wimbledon loss?
@@adnanshahriar4435honestly pathetic. Djokovic couldnt break serve to save his life and federer still couldnt bring it out. Didnt want to hit the backhand on the first mp and poor approach on the second
Funny, after 2013 and the racquet change I thought he was jumping the shark and going to retire. It must've been a good confidence booster to win this match. Then he went on to beat Novak in Dubai right after and eventually make the Wimby final. Never really got his 90 forehand back, but he improved his return game and evolved to stay competitive.
I still remember this match, the turning point of his twilight career after his disappointing 2013. He beat Del Potro in WTF 2013 and that was a glimpse of what to come in 2014. But it is this QF match in AO against one of the big 4 that gave him belief and confidence (see his facial expression when he won). That was the moment I believe he is officially back. Now I am waiting for him to get the 18th slam.
+hililala321 I think people got the impression more with the Tsonga match how he dismantled him. Lets be realistic Murray was working his way back from surgery here not saying he would have won but considering Nadal thrashed him semi final he clearly was not back
+Josh Jones Nadal played nearly his best in that match and Federer used a horrible strategy. If Nadal had played like that in the final, he would've beaten Wawrinka.
Can’t remember when is the last time I saw the highlights match video this good quality from any channel! Seeing the ball very clearly in every shot, and w/great commentators. Absolute awesome video/works. Thank you for posting. I’m appreciated. For many reasons, I miss Federer.
well murray doesn't have very good mental. he only didn't get pissed off this match for once because he knew he was gonna lose. but him not complaining actually made him come back some. so he should try that more often you would think. but eh, Federer is way better anyway so who cares
@@user-mf5ue6rc5n weak player and 20 Grand Slams. Federer with just a bit better mental would have beaten Djokovic and Nadal in the most of their clashes because he has the best technique and natural talent.
@@robakooo96 Yep. If you aggregate the stats throughout Federer and Djokovic's meetings, Federer leads in points and sets won... it quite literally comes down to mental strength in the decisive moments.
Blocked him? He played semi in AO, final at Wimbledon and got to the final of WTF even tho he didn't play. Was a great season for him. Maybe you talk about 2013.
Charlie Tong That makes no sense. Why would them being a Fedtard make them hate Murray? Fedtards love Del Potro, so why would Murray be any different. I'll tell you why we don't like Murray. His presence on court is annoying. He's always complaining about everything. Federer can be grumpy, but Murray is way way worse. When off the court Murray is a great guy, but on court I just can't get myself to like him. Then there's the fact that he's British. Tennis is a very British sports and that led to him being pushed alongside the three greats (Federer, Nadal and Djokovic.) Murray is not nearly as good as these guys. These three are the best in history, while Murray wouldn't even make the top 20. yet they're still trying to get him out there as one of the "big four."
Hey, Fed fan here too. Because whenever Murray reaches his personal milestone, out come excuses and degradation from a certain group within the fan base. For example, some complain that he only beat Fed in Olympics because Fed was more tired, even though Murray spent more time on court because he also had to play doubles. Or how he only got to Number 1 because everyone else was injured, even though Fed won RG because he didn't have to beat Nadal who was also injured. Maybe asking you to like him is impossible, but does it hurt to give the guy some respect? If you thought I was only generalizing that only Fed fans insult Murray because other groups also mock him, then I apologize for that and edited my previous comment. First of all, you seem to have a misconception. The Big 4 term was coined by the American press in 2008, when Djokovic still only had 1 slam at the time, refuting your implication that the British press is responsible for the "hype" Murray gets. The term refers to their overall consistency, not their total slam count. Within their era, they've been the most consistently dominant players in terms of ranking and reaching deep into most tournaments. No one ever said Murray was one of the goats; all people have said is that he's the fourth most consistent and best player in this playing period. And on a site note, Murray would actually be in the top 20, not outside. Besides slam total, less than 20 players in the game have ended the year number 1, and his overall masters titles and win percentage put him around Agassi's and Sampras's range.
Charlie Tong I do agree on the note that Murray's 2012 olympics win over Roger wasn't because Roger was tired. Roger didn't have his best match that day, but it was mainly due to Murray playing out of his skin. However, Fed winning Roland Garros and Murray being number one in the world are completely different issues. The Fedal rivalry is explicably one sided, which is the sole reason why it took Roger so long to get a RG title. (Fed has always been a good clay courter, contrary to popular belief.) Murray's number one ranking, was in fact due to a lack of proper challenge. Federer and Nadal were both out, and Nole has been just a shell of what he used to be since RG 2016. It's no coincidence that Murray only became number one in the world *after* Djokovic deflated. Being number one in the world is still an amazing achievement, but his ranking being a result of the field weakening is no myth. Are you sure about the term big four first being publicly used by American press in 2008? A year or two ago I did some research on how this term came to be, and then I learnt about the British press' influence. Then again, I don't have any valid sources on that anymore and can't seem to find any, so I'll assume you're right. My bad then. It makes a lot of sense though. Murray first started challenging the big guys during the American hardcourt swing in 2008, hence the American press catching on. That invalidates my last point, but still leaves the original point standing. *We don't dislike Murray, because we're Fed fans, or fans of any other player for that matter. We dislike Murray, because we dislike Murray.*
Certainly, Fed is a really good court player despite the relative lack of titles. I guess what I was trying to say was both players have certainly been aided by external circumstances, with you implying Murray more so than Fed. I can see that: Fed only had to worry about Nadal while Murray, who even though was still ranked higher than Fedal in 2016, suddenly didn't need to worry about Fedal playing or a consistently in form Novak dominating. As to whether how much things would have changed, we will never know because it's all in the past. And it doesn't matter at this point, because you and I aren't even arguing about that matter at all. Again, if one of my statements wasn't clear, I agree. Nothing wrong with disliking him; just hope that the dislike doesn't go too far to the point of devaluing his achievements.
It's very interesting to me that, after seeing a coupple of videos of andy against guys like roger and novak that in the first point of the match, andy always hits the ball amazing and wins with an amazing winner, after very good shots. Why doesn't he play like that all the match?
From late 2012-2013 Andy plays like this. Every point was contested. Its just not sustainable for more than 1 year. He lack the killer shot to shorten the point.
Am I the only one who thinks Andy Murray hasn't got depth in his forehand. There's just no fluidity. He just can't hit sharp shots down the line. His control and technique is amazing though.
Murray did extremely well considering his physique, as excellent as it was in general, was not ideal for tennis, and he's has done great in spite of that. Nothing at all to regret.
Wow its already 5 years Federer was then 32 and Murray 26 hard the believe that it is 5 years of this match both were relative young back and physically strong then and now both are getting older and physically declining althougt Federer at age 37 is not so bad for his age but Murray at age 31 is almost done.
+Bigcrusher55 played at that speed and I honestly dont see a double bounce..the umpire would have probably seen it if it was, it was right in front of the chair..
Always thought this was a brave effort from Federer. He had the impossible draw - in-form Murray in the QF, in-form Nadal in the SF, then Wawrinka in the final. There's almost 0% chance he can win the AO, but he still fought with everything he had. Great win against Andy, then got shut down by Nadal. Roger still shows a lot of heart in these big matches even as he isn't a clear-cut favorite anymore as he gets older. Technically this was an upset - 6th seed beating the 4rth. Great match and victory.
Murray's record against Fed and the rest of the big 3 toward the back half of his career was so weird. Didn't he lose like his last 9 matches against Federer despite being 6 years younger? *checks* hrm last 5 anyways, but bad for someone who was once 6-2 against Fed. Then he went 5-12
This video proves Murray just had irregular timing in 2014, he brought out the best he had to save the third set. Great match, at the end how much Rod Laver enjoys watching high quality tennis.
i did hear a lot of people hate him because of his attitude. But at the same time....they say he's pretty much the ugliest guy in the top 10. lol.... can't disagree with them there...
Federer et djoko c'est Zidane et Messi. Messi est peut être plus efficace ,mais ce que fait Zidane est plus inattendu, on sent le cerveau ,la réflexion à la vitesse du son chez Zidane ,puis les inventions ,en plus des gestes d'une rare pureté ,la diversité des dribles chez Zidane , c'est exactement pareil chez fédèrer. J'aime et je supporte djoko à fond ,mais c'est Rogers qui m'a ramené au tennis quand ,je l'ai vu à la télé un soir de 2006 ,et je dis que techniquement , variété des coups, Rogers est meilleur . Même si djoko est plus efficace .
Djoko est au tennis ce que Nietchz est à la littérature, ce que Mozart est à la musique. C est cadencé c est précis c est mélodieux c est parfait une symphonie à lui tout seul. Profitez parce que ça n arrivera plus dans ce siècle de voir quelqu'un d aussi complet aussi fort si longtemps.... Le sens du détail de Djoko même dans une chute... Parti pour poser sa main droite au sol, il se reprend et préfère une rotation avec l'aide de sa main gauche pour ne prendre aucun risque.
Djokovic's can be pretty clunky-looking at times, Gasquet's just looks completely wrong, Tomic's is weird (but there is a certain appeal to it), and Gulbis's is utter shit. Personally, I kind of like Isner's. It almost reminds me of James Blake's (when he's moving forward, that is).
Vesciroth God, I've forgotten how much I miss Blake. Great player, just lacking in some areas. But yeah, Gasquet's is weird because he insists on hitting with a flat Eastern grip. It looks ridiculous, and it's unpredictable to boot.
Unfortunately I don't have time to watch every match highlights... Anyone want to post the time of their favorite shot/some of the best rallies? a highlight of the highlights, if you will :). Thanks!
Bryant Luu It was clearly a double bounce, that's why Murray was looking back at the umpire. Can't believe the umpire didn't pick that up. You can see it bounce a second time before Federer picks it up
DaProHobbit Really? I keep watching the slow motion replay and I can't see the 2nd bounce at all, Looks like he just picks it up with the edge of his racket.
It's very close, but you can see the ball hit the ground just before, maybe for just one frame. Besides, you can't really pick it up like that with just a mishit flick, it'd need to be travelling upwards before bouncing off the racket to be a successful lob.
Every great shot Federer hits is a thing of beauty..the ultimate shot maker..
@@utado1 Jesus Christ was electro-magnetic waves led by electro-magnetic waves in Roger’s ethereal soul. Since Fed is his chosen one, favourite! Lol
What you’re not seeing in the highlights is the volume of errors. For every great shot there is a bad one
Thanks for mentioning that..I just corrected myself.
Obviously no player goes through a match without making errors.
I think we so underestimate the quality of this because Federer doesn't dramatise his shots by grunting and Murray, too, is fairly quiet. Federer's footwork here is unbelievably fast, his game extraordinarily fluid and his decision making crisp as anything. He makes it look as though he intended the point to end that way all along.
Hi! I have been following your comments on a few videos now. You're quite insightful generally. I'm curious, what do you think of Roger's 2019 Wimbledon loss?
@@adnanshahriar4435honestly pathetic. Djokovic couldnt break serve to save his life and federer still couldnt bring it out. Didnt want to hit the backhand on the first mp and poor approach on the second
Andy played so well, but Roger made him look almost like an average ATP player, result wise. Roger’s game is so smooth. Unbelievable.
5:15: Insane return then insaner passing shot
2007-2017 golden era of tennis
Funny, after 2013 and the racquet change I thought he was jumping the shark and going to retire. It must've been a good confidence booster to win this match. Then he went on to beat Novak in Dubai right after and eventually make the Wimby final. Never really got his 90 forehand back, but he improved his return game and evolved to stay competitive.
yeah and he could be more aggressive with his backhand in 2017/start of 2018. then it kind of simmered down
I still remember this match, the turning point of his twilight career after his disappointing 2013. He beat Del Potro in WTF 2013 and that was a glimpse of what to come in 2014. But it is this QF match in AO against one of the big 4 that gave him belief and confidence (see his facial expression when he won). That was the moment I believe he is officially back. Now I am waiting for him to get the 18th slam.
Well you're gonna have a very long wait,
Stick a fork in him, Roger is done.
Carlos Ike you can write off anyone but Roger Federer
when nadal slows down, roger is still slam contender, after djokovic slow down will be same. I believe 18 will come. Roger plays like 10 yrs younger.
+hililala321 I think people got the impression more with the Tsonga match how he dismantled him. Lets be realistic Murray was working his way back from surgery here not saying he would have won but considering Nadal thrashed him semi final he clearly was not back
+Josh Jones Nadal played nearly his best in that match and Federer used a horrible strategy. If Nadal had played like that in the final, he would've beaten Wawrinka.
Can’t remember when is the last time I saw the highlights match video this good quality from any channel!
Seeing the ball very clearly in every shot, and w/great commentators.
Absolute awesome video/works.
Thank you for posting. I’m appreciated.
For many reasons, I miss Federer.
Watching Federer play Tennis is a Privilege...What a Treat
20:37 "not bad"
For a third best player
@@user-mf5ue6rc5n Murray is not the third best player u imbecile
Andy played well- but Roger's on another level- (unmatched by anyone).
Matched and beaten by Novak
Murray was coming back from a long term injury
Yeah 😂 acting like he didn’t get beaten in straight sets by Rafa in the next match.
Nadal literally destroyed him in the semi final
@@haajiryabre335its how fedfans cope, just give them a break
This video is so well made, vision and audio!
5:15 incredible point and I love the camera angle
7:02 Oh yeah baby that was a sweet volley.
who said murray has NO mental? federer should won this match in straight set but the comeback of murray in the third set was tremendous !
well murray doesn't have very good mental. he only didn't get pissed off this match for once because he knew he was gonna lose. but him not complaining actually made him come back some. so he should try that more often you would think. but eh, Federer is way better anyway so who cares
Murray is actually really strong mentally. He's fought from match points down countless times.
Awesome quality and court level surprise
I LOVE ROGER
Why
Борислав Димитров Why do You need to know?
i caught the ball he hit at the end of the match.
Nice bro
Youre a lucky person.
Can confirm, I was the ball
@@gnochhuos645 can confirm, i was the net
19:04 Roger "3/15 BP" Federer. Just Roger things ;)
Just weak player stuff
@@user-mf5ue6rc5n can’t even spell correctly when trying to insult people
@@mapthemultiverse talk to my keyboard, not to me bitch, it assumes that I want to type different word
@@user-mf5ue6rc5n weak player and 20 Grand Slams. Federer with just a bit better mental would have beaten Djokovic and Nadal in the most of their clashes because he has the best technique and natural talent.
@@robakooo96 Yep. If you aggregate the stats throughout Federer and Djokovic's meetings, Federer leads in points and sets won... it quite literally comes down to mental strength in the decisive moments.
J'adore la vidéo de Federer avec des commentateurs français, on peut apprendre une nouvelle langue en même temps
Thank you andy Murray and federer for this match amazing , i respect two players ❤️❤️❤️
and was injured in that match. He didn't already recovered from surgery, which blocked him for all 2014
nah that was 2013
Blocked him? He played semi in AO, final at Wimbledon and got to the final of WTF even tho he didn't play. Was a great season for him. Maybe you talk about 2013.
NLLeFa he’s talking about Andy.
So incredible!!
I might be the only person on the planet that likes Andy Murray. Give the guy a break!
You're not alone. Just shows how hella biased some of the Fedal/Djokovic/Wawrinka fans are.
Charlie Tong That makes no sense. Why would them being a Fedtard make them hate Murray? Fedtards love Del Potro, so why would Murray be any different.
I'll tell you why we don't like Murray. His presence on court is annoying. He's always complaining about everything. Federer can be grumpy, but Murray is way way worse.
When off the court Murray is a great guy, but on court I just can't get myself to like him.
Then there's the fact that he's British. Tennis is a very British sports and that led to him being pushed alongside the three greats (Federer, Nadal and Djokovic.) Murray is not nearly as good as these guys. These three are the best in history, while Murray wouldn't even make the top 20. yet they're still trying to get him out there as one of the "big four."
Hey, Fed fan here too. Because whenever Murray reaches his personal milestone, out come excuses and degradation from a certain group within the fan base. For example, some complain that he only beat Fed in Olympics because Fed was more tired, even though Murray spent more time on court because he also had to play doubles. Or how he only got to Number 1 because everyone else was injured, even though Fed won RG because he didn't have to beat Nadal who was also injured. Maybe asking you to like him is impossible, but does it hurt to give the guy some respect? If you thought I was only generalizing that only Fed fans insult Murray because other groups also mock him, then I apologize for that and edited my previous comment.
First of all, you seem to have a misconception. The Big 4 term was coined by the American press in 2008, when Djokovic still only had 1 slam at the time, refuting your implication that the British press is responsible for the "hype" Murray gets. The term refers to their overall consistency, not their total slam count. Within their era, they've been the most consistently dominant players in terms of ranking and reaching deep into most tournaments. No one ever said Murray was one of the goats; all people have said is that he's the fourth most consistent and best player in this playing period.
And on a site note, Murray would actually be in the top 20, not outside. Besides slam total, less than 20 players in the game have ended the year number 1, and his overall masters titles and win percentage put him around Agassi's and Sampras's range.
Charlie Tong
I do agree on the note that Murray's 2012 olympics win over Roger wasn't because Roger was tired. Roger didn't have his best match that day, but it was mainly due to Murray playing out of his skin.
However, Fed winning Roland Garros and Murray being number one in the world are completely different issues. The Fedal rivalry is explicably one sided, which is the sole reason why it took Roger so long to get a RG title. (Fed has always been a good clay courter, contrary to popular belief.)
Murray's number one ranking, was in fact due to a lack of proper challenge. Federer and Nadal were both out, and Nole has been just a shell of what he used to be since RG 2016. It's no coincidence that Murray only became number one in the world *after* Djokovic deflated. Being number one in the world is still an amazing achievement, but his ranking being a result of the field weakening is no myth.
Are you sure about the term big four first being publicly used by American press in 2008? A year or two ago I did some research on how this term came to be, and then I learnt about the British press' influence. Then again, I don't have any valid sources on that anymore and can't seem to find any, so I'll assume you're right. My bad then.
It makes a lot of sense though. Murray first started challenging the big guys during the American hardcourt swing in 2008, hence the American press catching on.
That invalidates my last point, but still leaves the original point standing.
*We don't dislike Murray, because we're Fed fans, or fans of any other player for that matter. We dislike Murray, because we dislike Murray.*
Certainly, Fed is a really good court player despite the relative lack of titles. I guess what I was trying to say was both players have certainly been aided by external circumstances, with you implying Murray more so than Fed. I can see that: Fed only had to worry about Nadal while Murray, who even though was still ranked higher than Fedal in 2016, suddenly didn't need to worry about Fedal playing or a consistently in form Novak dominating. As to whether how much things would have changed, we will never know because it's all in the past. And it doesn't matter at this point, because you and I aren't even arguing about that matter at all.
Again, if one of my statements wasn't clear, I agree. Nothing wrong with disliking him; just hope that the dislike doesn't go too far to the point of devaluing his achievements.
i will miss him so much 😢
8:55 WOW RALLY
And 14:12! Everything Murray had to do: from serve - to rally - to redlining his shots - beautiful
Damn, I forgot how well Fed played here. Then he got absolutely smoked by Rafa🤣
It's very interesting to me that, after seeing a coupple of videos of andy against guys like roger and novak that in the first point of the match, andy always hits the ball amazing and wins with an amazing winner, after very good shots. Why doesn't he play like that all the match?
+Alex Sander Cause it's impossible lol
From late 2012-2013 Andy plays like this. Every point was contested. Its just not sustainable for more than 1 year. He lack the killer shot to shorten the point.
+Tevez Charlotte yeah he's too defensive sometimes
Siempre Roger sera el mejor 👏 👍
Federer was in such good form in AO2014, but Nadal was just a buzz saw in that semifinal match. One of his most underrated performances.
The get and lob at 11:43 is spectacular skill and athleticism..damn..
when both were on the top of their game.....quality that only Djokovic can provide today
Am I the only one who thinks Andy Murray hasn't got depth in his forehand. There's just no fluidity. He just can't hit sharp shots down the line. His control and technique is amazing though.
The finish on the point that starts at 6:38 - only Roger
Federer played great. Murray doesnt dare to go for winners, and i cant understand why.
Murray was coming back from a long term injury
if Murray improve his return I think he win. he plays really well but just unlucky.
The movement and dig from Fed in the 11:36 point is just ridiculous.
Comfortable win for Roger, but Murray had just had back surgery a few months before this, so clearly wasn't 100%.
Only Federer can play the volley at 6.52
Murray did extremely well considering his physique, as excellent as it was in general, was not ideal for tennis, and he's has done great in spite of that. Nothing at all to regret.
Go federer go
Wow, great Roger Federer, my Idol
it's a tennis of wow
11:40 how tf what why how
just a classic from the maestro and his wilson wand!
Mischa Riedo it didn't bounce twice you idiot. don't people have eyes. the racquet got the ball before it reaches the ground.
soheil adam no it didn’t
2.25 Federer showing what was to come with his backhand.
full HD is 1080p not 720p duh
So this was Federer first try to be NEO !
7:51 Federer is 1000% talking at Murray’s box, wonder what he’s saying??
Wow its already 5 years Federer was then 32 and Murray 26 hard the believe that it is 5 years of this match both were relative young back and physically strong then and now both are getting older and physically declining althougt Federer at age 37 is not so bad for his age but Murray at age 31 is almost done.
If only Fed had Murray's bh or Andy had Fed's fh
11:43 is just phenomenal athleticism and raquet head control..
+kid gloves that was definitely a double bounce lol, play it at 0,25 speed
+Bigcrusher55 played at that speed and I honestly dont see a double bounce..the umpire would have probably seen it if it was, it was right in front of the chair..
Stop saying what is not true. Most certainly NOT a double bounce.
@@djpete2009 its definitely a double
un légère préférence pour le suisse de la part de la commentatrice "C EST ENORME" ""QUEL ENCHAINEMENT" ; Murray: tintin.
Always thought this was a brave effort from Federer. He had the impossible draw - in-form Murray in the QF, in-form Nadal in the SF, then Wawrinka in the final. There's almost 0% chance he can win the AO, but he still fought with everything he had. Great win against Andy, then got shut down by Nadal.
Roger still shows a lot of heart in these big matches even as he isn't a clear-cut favorite anymore as he gets older. Technically this was an upset - 6th seed beating the 4rth. Great match and victory.
pru
in form Murray??? I beg to differ Murray was coming back from surgery.
Gazorpazordfield II i
In form Murray? He was just getting back from the worst season of his career at that time.
@@NLLeFa 2013 was one of Murray's best years, you're confused.
Roger is improving his backhand
At 13.25, Murray hits a second serve that is 100kmh / 62mph. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a serve that slow? Sam Groth can add 100mph to that 😮😮
Federer can beat Murray at any age.
how did he not win this slam.
He played against Rafa at his absolute peak in the semi final that's why
Murray's record against Fed and the rest of the big 3 toward the back half of his career was so weird. Didn't he lose like his last 9 matches against Federer despite being 6 years younger? *checks* hrm last 5 anyways, but bad for someone who was once 6-2 against Fed. Then he went 5-12
It's annoying Federer did not win a grand slam this year or the next. It has cost him the GOAT tag.
Just goes to show that Murray was and is still never Federer's calibre. Federer is 32 years old here.
6:39
12:00 was definitely not up.
The ball was a lob which had topspin on it, that can’t happen unless it was a double bounce.
This video proves Murray just had irregular timing in 2014, he brought out the best he had to save the third set. Great match, at the end how much Rod Laver enjoys watching high quality tennis.
at 2:36 it's that roger saying " bien joué" or it s somthing else ??
+nassim rebbahi He said "yeah well played"
12:00 Federer made an illegal shot (double bounce) but got away with it which is why Murray reacts the way he did. :)
no he didnt
@@Dara-wq3sg I think he probably got it while it bounced, which is already illegal. But it's the officials' job to call it.
I don’t think that was an illegal shot. It is hard to tell since it is very close to the floor but I think Federer got just before it bounced again.
@@sebastiandufau5798 Federer is evil
just watch it at 0.25 speed and spam pause, you will notice the ball hasn't bounced twice
these older generations are much more athletically built then the scrawny new generations now
Murray is a boring pusher. Humiliation in this match
To compare these legends playing with current so called next gens player … honestly …. There is no match up … big time …
Sorry for you Tennis … 😢
What's the name of the racquet used by Federer in this match?
+Pedro Pablo Ackermann RF97 Autograph
+mohannad alghamdi it seems to me he's not using that one in this match
+Pedro Pablo Ackermann it is that one, but without paint. Back then the rf97 didn't exist yet
+Sybren Oerlemans Thanks!
I believe it was a test racquet because he switched to 97" after 2013
4:14
Real men use one hand for backhand shots
War movie
Federer has class,murray never has and never will
you have no class so your words are meaningless
@@zora99ny Not necessarily... Federer's considerably less cantankerous and vulgar on court...
One guy just play, but the other set up to kill.
Why is better then?
페옹
O la la
19:24 Cinnabon?
just LOVE to see murray lose,against anyone
Jajaja me too!
peter Last me too
i did hear a lot of people hate him because of his attitude. But at the same time....they say he's pretty much the ugliest guy in the top 10. lol.... can't disagree with them there...
Agreed. His tennis always causes sleepiness to me
Murray has the worst forehand of all time
Federer et djoko c'est Zidane et Messi.
Messi est peut être plus efficace ,mais ce que fait Zidane est plus inattendu, on sent le cerveau ,la réflexion à la vitesse du son chez Zidane ,puis les inventions ,en plus des gestes d'une rare pureté ,la diversité des dribles chez Zidane , c'est exactement pareil chez fédèrer.
J'aime et je supporte djoko à fond ,mais c'est Rogers qui m'a ramené au tennis quand ,je l'ai vu à la télé un soir de 2006 ,et je dis que techniquement , variété des coups, Rogers est meilleur . Même si djoko est plus efficace .
Djoko est au tennis ce que Nietchz est à la littérature, ce que Mozart est à la musique. C est cadencé c est précis c est mélodieux c est parfait une symphonie à lui tout seul. Profitez parce que ça n arrivera plus dans ce siècle de voir quelqu'un d aussi complet aussi fort si longtemps....
Le sens du détail de Djoko même dans une chute... Parti pour poser sa main droite au sol, il se reprend et préfère une rotation avec l'aide de sa main gauche pour ne prendre aucun risque.
Swiss clock at work !
Bartoli juste insupportable ! 😒
強いときのマレー別人だな
21:00 I'd love playing for that smile.
Murray has the worst forehand of all time
Why does Murray hit his racquet against the ground so much? It’s very annoying
11:42 How is that even fucking possible?
Fed was so angry the whole match dont know why
Because he had a shitty last season and just lost another final 2 weeks prior...
Playing against pushing murray brings it out of him
Forget it Murray, you're ginger.
With the possible exception of John Isner's, is there anyone on the ATP tour with an uglier forehand than Murray's?
Djokovic's can be pretty clunky-looking at times, Gasquet's just looks completely wrong, Tomic's is weird (but there is a certain appeal to it), and Gulbis's is utter shit.
Personally, I kind of like Isner's. It almost reminds me of James Blake's (when he's moving forward, that is).
Vesciroth God, I've forgotten how much I miss Blake. Great player, just lacking in some areas. But yeah, Gasquet's is weird because he insists on hitting with a flat Eastern grip. It looks ridiculous, and it's unpredictable to boot.
The One™ Blake's backhand was surprisingly good at his best. Such a shame that he had no court sense.
Maybe Fed does, but we don't know because of his bandannas.
John Yancheski That makes no sense.
thoroughly enjoy watching murray lose.
Unfortunately I don't have time to watch every match highlights... Anyone want to post the time of their favorite shot/some of the best rallies? a highlight of the highlights, if you will :). Thanks!
Uffff
I don't give it a like. Because 666. Love fedrer
Nole is the best!
Pick up at ua-cam.com/video/pAqynOD_-AA/v-deo.html#t=720 is not human
Bryant Luu It was clearly a double bounce, that's why Murray was looking back at the umpire. Can't believe the umpire didn't pick that up. You can see it bounce a second time before Federer picks it up
DaProHobbit Really? I keep watching the slow motion replay and I can't see the 2nd bounce at all, Looks like he just picks it up with the edge of his racket.
It's very close, but you can see the ball hit the ground just before, maybe for just one frame. Besides, you can't really pick it up like that with just a mishit flick, it'd need to be travelling upwards before bouncing off the racket to be a successful lob.
wimbledon, not wimbledòn !!! shit !
guys it's a joke...just before you hate me... :)
Federer is betterer!
NADAL IS COMING BACK, HE WILL WIN AT LEAT 20 GRAND SLAMS, be ready WORLD
gustavo bedoya perhaps, and perhaps Federer will end with 22.
one of the last good matches from Roger.
SO GLAD THE AGE OF FEDERER IS OVER