I don’t think Endymion puts up Omni negates though? He is specifically spell/trap negates. I’ve never played against the deck so I don’t know what their end board is but it can’t put up Omni-negates with in-archetype cards and while secret village of the spellcasters is really fucking annoying it kinda invalidates Endymion’s turn 2 negates? He can’t negate anything since your opponent can’t play spells in the first place.
also the problem with ultimateness one kaiju ruin ur board already and had to rely on hand trap if it happens while in endymion has seperate negates that ur opponent has to deal with
- "I activate Macrocosmos." - "What does it do?" - "It adds 1..." - "Say no more! I'm gonna Ash it." - "Uhm... Ok, I guess." The opponent was literally a fourth rate duelist with a first rate deck. That your deck can put many negates and do crazy board presence doesn't mean that the player knows how to use it effectively. It hurts to see but also shows how some players are like "Look at all these amazing cards I have but don't know how to use them.".
to be honest, most players doesnt even know how to use most cards, and just follow the meta in braindead manners hell, most players doesnt even read the cards in play
@@lolialf And that's because yugioh has a very steep learning curve and most people in Master Duels are new. What choice do they have other than to follow meta? Even seasoned players in the TCG don't know how to use most cards.
@@N0noy1989 I mean they could do what I did, build two shit decks learn why they were shit and then build a rogue deck that ntrs a ton of meta decks. Why look up meta decks that you don't know how to play when you could just learn how to play?
_”When your opponent would Special Summon a monster(s), OR activates a Spell/Trap Card, or a monster effect (Quick Effect): _*_You can send 1 Fairy monster from your hand to the GY;_*_ negate the Special Summon or activation, and if you do, destroy that card.“_ He can’t activate Herald’s effect if he can’t send the cards to the GY. I love tiny details in cards which reveal their ultimate weakness.
That's what I love about Yugioh, exploiting some weaknesses of cards to turn it around late game. In DM anime era YGO, this video right here reminded me on Yugi trying to flip the tables against impossible decks by bringing up the small weakness.
@@TheGundamDude8045 This legit reminded me when Yugi defeated Golden Castle of Stromberg in the anime, by using the small weakness to get rid of a seemingly indestructible card.
Drytron Player: "Ahhh yes my opponent is playing a monster effect light, beatdown deck. Let me link off my 2200 attack Unicorn for a 2 negate 1600 attack Appolousa"
These meta crutch players think their cards have a response to everything but as soon as they see an unconventional deck they can never adapt and just keep trying to negate stuff lmao
@@Ilgazzoo lol you're totally right. I was running Gingerbread House and it was amazing how many people didn't get rid of it and let me get 2+ board clears with it when using my stall deck.
@@Ilgazzoo Not quite the same vein but a while back I remember some albaz player being confused that me using his Fallen as tribute material during his turn meant Albaz's effect didn't resolve and he couldn't fuse away Erebus
I have a great replay of a match where I lucked into going first with kind of a bum hand as thunder dragon, still managed to get out colossus and a 3 mat apollo You can see them absolutely fuming trying to get colossus the hell off the field so they could use one of their 40 searches.
I remember a while back at a locals I did that with subterrors by flipping summon limit and TCBOO. Pretty sure he wasn’t slightly happy about that judging from his expression
I started my duel having my Maxx C negated. Then ended my duel with a Zeus double strike on their stupid ass field spells. Finally, the asshole had the gall to negate my duel pass rewards by negating his internet connection.
For anyone else who may wonder, around the 2:54 Mark Dryton used Ash Blossom on Macro Cosmos (it has an Effect to SS from Deck) so it only negated that summon. Because Macro Cosmos is now active, Herald of Ultimateness cannot use its effect, as it needs you to send a Fairy to GRAVEYARD as Cost, which isn't possible due to Macro Cosmos.
Ash Blossom the Macro just because it has a SS from the deck effect, even though almost no one plays Macro for Helios and Ash does not destroy. Damn, is that what having 5 omni-negates does to your brain?
I love how they had lethal through the macro cosmos @ ~7:30 by attacking with borrelsword into the storm monarch to pump it to 4200, attacking into the DD survivor with Zeta, and then turning zeta and attacking again with borrelsword for game, but were so tilted off by the macro cosmos that they didn't see what was a very basic line
@@lamofjldgm6230 Too bad he can't do that then, since macro banishes all cards that would go to the graveyard and ultimateness clearly states, "send to a fairy monster from your hand to the Graveyard" in it's cost. Because of Macro Cosmos, he cannot fulfill the cost condition and thus can't activate the effect. Essentially, by not negating Macro cosmos' activation, only it's special summoning effect, he couldn't negate anything else either.
Lol. I loved watching you win this. But that was seriously a mind-blowing number of mistakes from the opponent. Missing obvious lethal with Borrelsword, thinking Ash destroys, getting rid of a 2200 to make a 1600 ATK Apollousa _for no reason_ ... I'd even think getting rid of Borrelsword for Unicorn was a misplay, he had no practical resources left that weren't banished anyway.
I had the same thought, but i remembered myself that Cosmos SS is Helios and because I knew Ash couldnt do anything to MCosmos My guy didnt read, keeping the meme that YGO players dont read cards anymore alive
Had a match with an Eldlich player today, He tried to ss Eldlich using the trap card when I have a magician's left hand, twice. The meme is more alive now.
@@ValunarTonix I've seen people use Verte for other things, like E-Hero decks and Pendulum FTK. Pend FTK uses it to use Instant Fusion to get out Independent Nightingale, since Supreme King Dragon Starving Venom is not banned in this game.
@@ValunarTonix Verte is far from meta-defining but it does fit some decks. Fluffal uses it, Shaddoll uses it, E-Hero uses it but few people play them since it's so expensive, and I could use it in my Thunder Dragon deck but Thunder Dragon Fusion is already so easy to tutor without it that it feels like a waste of a slot.
I will forever love that one time i beat a Drytron deck with my Aromas. How did i do it? Well apparently you can't negate infinite things and pretend to have a hand or graveyard later. I never won again with that deck, they destroyed me.
I had a drytron player scoop after stealing my Metaion, no idea why. Since I was playing exodia and they played right into my Maxx C, I had enough cards to entirely drain their hand.
I instead pulled a uno reverse on a drytron player...so, turns out he banished with called my best combo piece, I did exactly that against his herald. And for good measure, I went abyss dweller on that play too. He surrendered instantly
I remembered beating drytron with my f2p pendulum magician Opponent summoned ultimateness in 1st turn In my turn, he ran out of monster card to negate, and his ultimateness is destroyed by purple poison's effect (I ran electrumite) He ragequitted in next turn Feel so good
this video realy shows that most of master duel player play certain decks bcs they heard they are op and its working. For example this drytron player who obviously doesnt know how to play his deck nor does he know how to play yugioh in general since he is missplaying all the time, and he can still bring out a 5 negate board.
@@suisui5930 You don't have to be playing a pure Kaiju deck in order to play Kaijus. And even so, it's usually Luna-Kaiju, which most certainly uses monster effects.
The reason they couldn’t negate The Monarch from bouncing Harald is because Macros Cosmos auto banishes cards….but Harald of Ultimateness requires the card you discard to be sent to the graveyard. So if it can’t be sent to the graveyard then it can’t negate
Agreed, the only reason I won against a banish deck with synchros was by using my opponents own Maxx "C" for Synchro plays as all other cards were banished.
One of the strongest, the best is return to deck. Some deck like banishing while others don't care and many others get crippled. In comparison nearly every deck hates being returned to the deck besides a select few(excited Madolche noises).
This dude doesn’t read a single card just play blindfolded and probably didn’t know what otk is, i can’t believe how baffling this guy action is by sacrificing his own borrelsword, unicorn and everything for an Apollousa with 2 negates
I play a hero deck and the interaction between Masked Hero Dark Law and card effects that need to be sent to the graveyard in order to activate is pretty interesting, dark law counters those kind of decks that rely heavily on it. My friend and I was testing out to see if cards like forbidden droplet worked but nope :D because card cannot activate effect since cards cannot be sent to the graveyard since they were going to be banished instead due to dark law's effect.
This is why first turn for HERO is very important. Dark Law might not prevent hand trap to stop them due to 'discard' but at least it protects the board from droplets, and disrupt Drytron and VW.
I considered teching in Dark Law into shaddoll-invoked since mask change 2 just makes dark law into a generic extra deck and a extra deck Macro cosmos but i only have one of each so not too consistent.
The first time I played against Drytrons, I went first and got Dark Law on the field. They banished a card they needed to send to the graveyard to get their herald synchro monster out (something about changing the level of a card to the level of a card sent to the GY). I didn't realize I had accidentally just beat the deck everyone was complaining about until later when I saw the full combo.
Prime example of why not to surrender turn 1 when u see meta, i beat full power VW with a deck i built to gain lp for the challenge and they lost because of lp difference burn card after like 60 turns, was crazy.
It is still UNBELIEVABLE how you manage to win that. Insane luck to be honest, that Drytron player had everything to control you and he didn't use it, still baffles me.
Herald of Ultimateness is my favorite card, but I don't play anymore cause this game is just not fun, but since when is Herald being used? I love the card art and I feel its fair since you have to discard for each negate and is a level 12 ritual, how tf did the meta make a deck that makes me feel guilty for using that card?
See before, Ultimateness was just a cool super gimmicky card with a strong effect that was impossible to summon. However, several keys mistakes were made that made the card so oppressive in Drytron 1. Meteonis Drytron is generic, the biggest mistake. It gives Drytron the ability to summon whatever they want without having to use other ritual spells, allowing them to completely abuse certain cards never meant to be played in a combo deck, such as Cyber Angel Benten or Ultimateness 2. Meteonis Drytron can ritual summon cards in the graveyard and recurs insanely easily, meaning that one card can Ritual Summon Benten and later Ultimateness in the same turn. Consistency is way up because you literally only have to run 4 ritual monsters, every other card can be a hand trap or resource generator, something that no Ritual Deck has ever had. Even if you don’t draw the Ultimateness, sending it to the graveyard (via Foolish Burial or Beatrice) and then Ritual Summoning it out is just as good 3. Eva allows for extremely easy searches of Combo Pieces, but also Ultimateness fuel, every Eva is essentially two more omni-summon negates. Along with Union Carrier, which significantly helps to activate Eva’s effect, the deck is absurdly consistent. 4. The Drytron Cards allow you to not have to genuinely expend massive resources to summon Ultimateness, meaning you still have huge field presence to make other XYZ or Link Monsters 5. The Herald Cards have support cards, just as Diviner of The Herald, which lets you send Herald Of The Arc Light from the extra deck to the grave to immediately search a Meteonis Drytron and Herald Of The Orange Light, which is a monster negating handtrap, which only improves their consistency and disruptive capabilities even more Drytron is a deck with almost perfect consistency, as this is easily possible by just opening 2 Drytron monsters, Incredible Field presence, immense resilience to distruption, the means to easily summon a card that will almost certainly win them the duel if their opponent doesn’t draw 1 of like 5 cards and allows for a “Ritual Toolbox”, things unheard of in a Ritual deck until now. That’s why Ultimateness went from gimmicky to absurdly oppressive and hated boss monsters
The engine for Ultimateness was the problem here, not the actual card itself since it is supposed to have limited negates depending on your hand and because Dryton enables it, it should be obvious the problem is the combo pieces, like Duel Logs said, They should do what they did for the tcg hit for stopping Herald. It won't totally cripple Dryton and won't make Herald as much as degenerate as it is now.
Uhhh Drytron's gimmick for ritual summoning is to use the Machine monster's attack points instead of levels to ritual summon And... Guess what Herald of Ultimateness' attack points are?????
He couldn't negate since ultimateness needs to send a card to the graveyard and since Macro Cosmos is on the field cards are banished instead of hitting the grave.
drytrons : check ecclesia profile picture : check platinum border : check kys as username : check you got yourself a edgy teenagers that always plays solo in an MMO and picks the dual wielding class.
Didn't they already have lethal on summoning Borrelsword, or is there something in Herald of Ultimateness/ the way Herald was summoned that keeps it from attacking directly? If not they could've changed Herald to attack position, swung over Survivor with Borrelsword, attacked with Herald, then changed Herald to defence for the second Borrelsword attack right? 3900-900= 3000, +2000= 5000, +3900= 8900
My first ranked duel ever in Master Duel (I'm a returning player who hasn't touched yugioh since 2008 but been watching duel logs for 2 years now) was vs drytrons and they also got the herald out. Managed to stall long enough to get my combo's going in an AWFUL T.G. synchro deck meant to summon Shooting Quasar and the guy ended up rage quitting on the 9th turn, played through enough negates and stalled just long enough. There's no way I should have won that LOL.
The first time I played Drytrons, I had summoned Dark Law turn one, and they accidentally banished a card they needed to send to the graveyard to get their plays going. I didn't even realize it was Drytrons until later because the guy pulled out so fast.
Great game. Loved seeing the power of old floodgates against a bad meta player. Imo the Ash was an okay move but the plays after that were sloppy imao. Unicorn wasn't that terrible a play but he should have stuck with it and stall with a 2200 beatstick. Personally I would have kept the Borrelsword and Knightmare Phoenix and go for old-school beatdown. Keep the win-con, even if it's riskier.
macro cosmos and other continuous banish effects means they cant use herald ultimate effect.. As they have to send to "grave" for its effect and they cant do that as the card will be sent to void instead.
basically once macro is activated, any card that needs to send itself or another card to the GY is useless since it will get banished instead (which isn't included in it's cost) thats why herald is useless once macro is face-up, most hand-traps are too...
The drytron missed lethal on second turn by not attacking with herald of ultimateness then used borrelsword on herald to attack face twice while including 200 dmg from herald
He missed a shit ton of opportunities, he's really bad at playing the game in general but also his own deck I play pure Drytrons and trust me this deck can do incredible things
I'm still confused on this YGO ruling because technically new player. When you chain/activate Continuous/Field Spell/Traps as chain link X, do their effects IMMEDIATELY apply? That's what my brain's logic told me, which led me to once not omni negate an activated Mystic Mine on duelingbook because I thought they immediately apply. But a friend told me later you would still have one last chance to interact before the "activation is fully resolved" and their effects start to apply. It's as if Cont/Field S/Ts have to be in some invisible "floating resolution zone" just like normal S/Ts before their effects start to apply? Is it similarly applicable to 2:40 here where the Drytron player had one final chance to negate the Macro? Since after Macro resolves successfully neither player can send cards to the GY anymore which renders the Herald negates unactivatable since it sends cards to GY for cost.
Continuous effects are only applied once the resolution of activation or summon is completed, additionally, destroying a Continuous Spell/Trap or a Field Spell actually will fizzle the resolution of any On Field or When Played From Hand activated effect they might have, eg if I play Aroma Gardening, summon an Aroma and activate its "Gain 1000 LP" trigger, and you chain MST to pop it, my Gardening doesn't heal me
i cant understand why he doesnt ip to unicorn right away instead of borrelsword to get rid of macro cosmos, when he ended up sacrificing his borrelsword to unicorn anyway..
macro cosmos is always good against drytron and eldlich players. just take your 1st turn, set that and they will think twice for sending their cards to the gy
it's really hard watching this drytron player made a lot of mistakes. I can pardon the ash, but the others? man like he didnt even read the cards properly.
Love how the video starts with you saying not every board can put up 5 omni-negates then the opponent immediately reveals drytron
endymion players: *5 negates, secret village of spell caster(imperial order for player without spellcaster)
I don’t think Endymion puts up Omni negates though? He is specifically spell/trap negates. I’ve never played against the deck so I don’t know what their end board is but it can’t put up Omni-negates with in-archetype cards and while secret village of the spellcasters is really fucking annoying it kinda invalidates Endymion’s turn 2 negates? He can’t negate anything since your opponent can’t play spells in the first place.
they can make odd eyes vortex omni negate and 2-3 monster negate with appoloussa
@@Pitomin69 That’s just Pends in general not specifically Endymion.
also the problem with ultimateness one kaiju ruin ur board already and had to rely on hand trap if it happens while in endymion has seperate negates that ur opponent has to deal with
12:50 "Looks like your opponent is going to commit nickname" that really caught me off guard
That was the laugh of someone who knows they shouldn't be laughing
That’s really fucking hilarious.
That was such a good chat comment
- "I activate Macrocosmos."
- "What does it do?"
- "It adds 1..."
- "Say no more! I'm gonna Ash it."
- "Uhm... Ok, I guess."
The opponent was literally a fourth rate duelist with a first rate deck.
That your deck can put many negates and do crazy board presence doesn't mean that the player knows how to use it effectively. It hurts to see but also shows how some players are like "Look at all these amazing cards I have but don't know how to use them.".
to be honest, most players doesnt even know how to use most cards, and just follow the meta in braindead manners
hell, most players doesnt even read the cards in play
@@lolialf And that's because yugioh has a very steep learning curve and most people in Master Duels are new. What choice do they have other than to follow meta? Even seasoned players in the TCG don't know how to use most cards.
I see i can activate ash, so i should.
@@N0noy1989 I mean they could do what I did, build two shit decks learn why they were shit and then build a rogue deck that ntrs a ton of meta decks. Why look up meta decks that you don't know how to play when you could just learn how to play?
YEP BUTTONS
_”When your opponent would Special Summon a monster(s), OR activates a Spell/Trap Card, or a monster effect (Quick Effect): _*_You can send 1 Fairy monster from your hand to the GY;_*_ negate the Special Summon or activation, and if you do, destroy that card.“_
He can’t activate Herald’s effect if he can’t send the cards to the GY. I love tiny details in cards which reveal their ultimate weakness.
That's what I love about Yugioh, exploiting some weaknesses of cards to turn it around late game. In DM anime era YGO, this video right here reminded me on Yugi trying to flip the tables against impossible decks by bringing up the small weakness.
@@TheGundamDude8045 This legit reminded me when Yugi defeated Golden Castle of Stromberg in the anime, by using the small weakness to get rid of a seemingly indestructible card.
Since he would chain it on activation macrocosmos effect doesnt apply yet so he was still able to negate, therefore the misplay
@@JP-it4yt you are right well but at least that explains why he couldn't negate wind monarch
@@TheGundamDude8045 nah yugioh trash play something else
Drytron Player: "Ahhh yes my opponent is playing a monster effect light, beatdown deck. Let me link off my 2200 attack Unicorn for a 2 negate 1600 attack Appolousa"
These meta crutch players think their cards have a response to everything but as soon as they see an unconventional deck they can never adapt and just keep trying to negate stuff lmao
@@Ilgazzoo lol you're totally right. I was running Gingerbread House and it was amazing how many people didn't get rid of it and let me get 2+ board clears with it when using my stall deck.
I love watching drytron/eldlitch players get humiliated.
@@Ilgazzoo my favorite victory to date has been my gladiator beasts against eldlich.
@@Ilgazzoo Not quite the same vein but a while back I remember some albaz player being confused that me using his Fallen as tribute material during his turn meant Albaz's effect didn't resolve and he couldn't fuse away Erebus
This was glorious. There's nothing I enjoy seeing more than someone floodgating Drytrons
I have a great replay of a match where I lucked into going first with kind of a bum hand as thunder dragon, still managed to get out colossus and a 3 mat apollo
You can see them absolutely fuming trying to get colossus the hell off the field so they could use one of their 40 searches.
Specially when drytron already had the board! And even better if everything goes into the mistake of thinking ash solves all your problems!
I remember a while back at a locals I did that with subterrors by flipping summon limit and TCBOO. Pretty sure he wasn’t slightly happy about that judging from his expression
@@Pyroniusburn I have one where I got first and had 3 dimensional barriers in my hand safe to say that drytron player has a hole in their monitor
I started my duel having my Maxx C negated. Then ended my duel with a Zeus double strike on their stupid ass field spells. Finally, the asshole had the gall to negate my duel pass rewards by negating his internet connection.
For anyone else who may wonder, around the 2:54 Mark Dryton used Ash Blossom on Macro Cosmos (it has an Effect to SS from Deck) so it only negated that summon.
Because Macro Cosmos is now active, Herald of Ultimateness cannot use its effect, as it needs you to send a Fairy to GRAVEYARD as Cost, which isn't possible due to Macro Cosmos.
It would be mess up if the cost is to discard a fairy instead
When you see a Drytron player normal summon the orange Herald, you know they're on their wits end.
Ash Blossom the Macro just because it has a SS from the deck effect, even though almost no one plays Macro for Helios and Ash does not destroy. Damn, is that what having 5 omni-negates does to your brain?
Herald negated his brain
That’s how I feel about time thief redoer. His effect let’s him draw if you want but since it lets you draw, it’s an ash target
Good thing I play Stardusts, 4 omni negates doesn’t result in brain damage apparently.
I love how they had lethal through the macro cosmos @ ~7:30 by attacking with borrelsword into the storm monarch to pump it to 4200, attacking into the DD survivor with Zeta, and then turning zeta and attacking again with borrelsword for game, but were so tilted off by the macro cosmos that they didn't see what was a very basic line
much like the spanish inquisition, no one expects macro cosmos 2
They are Dryton, the only play they know is chain Ultimateness to every card opponent activates
@@lamofjldgm6230 Too bad he can't do that then, since macro banishes all cards that would go to the graveyard and ultimateness clearly states, "send to a fairy monster from your hand to the Graveyard" in it's cost. Because of Macro Cosmos, he cannot fulfill the cost condition and thus can't activate the effect. Essentially, by not negating Macro cosmos' activation, only it's special summoning effect, he couldn't negate anything else either.
It's not about winning, it's about sending a message.
the message is "I can't brain when im banished"
It's the duel links fanbase
"Not every board can put up, like, five omni-negates"
* sees fafnir *
"omg"
this timing was perfect XD
Lol. I loved watching you win this. But that was seriously a mind-blowing number of mistakes from the opponent. Missing obvious lethal with Borrelsword, thinking Ash destroys, getting rid of a 2200 to make a 1600 ATK Apollousa _for no reason_ ... I'd even think getting rid of Borrelsword for Unicorn was a misplay, he had no practical resources left that weren't banished anyway.
I don't think the opponent thought Ash destroyed... It seems like a typical player that goes meta and clicks buttons without reading.
@@Tomix4k more reason to enjoy his suffering.
funniest shit ever is that he could've won if he kept the borrel dragon but nah, he like mind break lol
@@NeoSuuko more like MIND CRUSHED
Maybe the average 'i watched a vid of dryton combo' players aren't actually very good...
I was so confused when he chained ash to macro. Then I remembered that macro special summons from the deck.
I had the same thought, but i remembered myself that Cosmos SS is Helios and because I knew Ash couldnt do anything to MCosmos
My guy didnt read, keeping the meme that YGO players dont read cards anymore alive
yep click
Had a match with an Eldlich player today, He tried to ss Eldlich using the trap card when I have a magician's left hand, twice. The meme is more alive now.
Fun fact, you can negate and destroy Macro Cosmos with Solemn Warning
Yep, even if you have no helios in the deck
Not every board can put up 5 omni negates that line was so perfect timed
Drytons when they see Blue-Eyes: 😄
Drytons when they see Skill Drain: 😬
People who use Ultimateness are probably the same people who hide behind Dragoons
I'm glad Dragoon is banned in master duel. May it never be unbanned. I haven't seen a Verte all month.
@@ValunarTonix I've seen people use Verte for other things, like E-Hero decks and Pendulum FTK. Pend FTK uses it to use Instant Fusion to get out Independent Nightingale, since Supreme King Dragon Starving Venom is not banned in this game.
@@ValunarTonix Verte is far from meta-defining but it does fit some decks. Fluffal uses it, Shaddoll uses it, E-Hero uses it but few people play them since it's so expensive, and I could use it in my Thunder Dragon deck but Thunder Dragon Fusion is already so easy to tutor without it that it feels like a waste of a slot.
@@ValunarTonix Destroyer Phoenix Enforcer incoming
People who use ultimateness are the little spoon
This video felt like watching an actual Yugioh episode and i love the outcome.
Absolutely love how this guy completely breaks down after having his 1 combo ripped apart. Faced this guy the other day I believe..
This proves Drytron players have less IQ than Bentens in deck and get hard carried by op cards
100%
Cannot disagree, even I as one of them
Negates are no good unless you can time them right
made drytron on a alt account, after 3 duels i understood how to play the deck and realized its complete cheese. wont touch ranked with the deck
I remember playing Macro Monarchs when Macro Cosmos got released in the TCG, so many good memories with that deck. Loved to see that vid!
I will forever love that one time i beat a Drytron deck with my Aromas. How did i do it? Well apparently you can't negate infinite things and pretend to have a hand or graveyard later.
I never won again with that deck, they destroyed me.
I had a drytron player scoop after stealing my Metaion, no idea why. Since I was playing exodia and they played right into my Maxx C, I had enough cards to entirely drain their hand.
I instead pulled a uno reverse on a drytron player...so, turns out he banished with called my best combo piece, I did exactly that against his herald. And for good measure, I went abyss dweller on that play too. He surrendered instantly
I remembered beating drytron with my f2p pendulum magician
Opponent summoned ultimateness in 1st turn
In my turn, he ran out of monster card to negate, and his ultimateness is destroyed by purple poison's effect (I ran electrumite)
He ragequitted in next turn
Feel so good
At least you’ve a win that’s more than some of us who don’t play meta
this video realy shows that most of master duel player play certain decks bcs they heard they are op and its working. For example this drytron player who obviously doesnt know how to play his deck nor does he know how to play yugioh in general since he is missplaying all the time, and he can still bring out a 5 negate board.
I'd almost be willing to bet the hand was Ash + 2x Called By. He didn't have a fairy to pitch.
"a floodgate is a card that prevents your opponent from playing the game"
truer words have never been spoken
Yeah, even a Kaiju won't necessarily autowin against drytrons, you still gotta deal with 3 orange lights after that.
U don't use monster effect in Kaiju deck.....?
@@suisui5930 You don't have to be playing a pure Kaiju deck in order to play Kaijus. And even so, it's usually Luna-Kaiju, which most certainly uses monster effects.
The reason they couldn’t negate The Monarch from bouncing Harald is because Macros Cosmos auto banishes cards….but Harald of Ultimateness requires the card you discard to be sent to the graveyard. So if it can’t be sent to the graveyard then it can’t negate
Opponent had game at 7:36 xD
People sometimes surrender when they see dimensional fissure in my toon deck. Maybe I should add macro cosmos...
Totally, it would be a troll to watch them scoop lmao.
I've also dueled this guy before. Im now glad i OTKed him with reverse burn.
A drytron player named "kys" fucking up and losing is some extreme catharsis.
Dude banishing cards is by far one of the strongest effects in yugioh. It's hard to have an out to and is just really effective usually
Agreed, the only reason I won against a banish deck with synchros was by using my opponents own Maxx "C" for Synchro plays as all other cards were banished.
Thunder Dragons: 😏 _you bet_
One of the strongest, the best is return to deck. Some deck like banishing while others don't care and many others get crippled. In comparison nearly every deck hates being returned to the deck besides a select few(excited Madolche noises).
This Drytron player makes me irritated beyond belief. He had literally EVERY TOOL to win, and somehow discovered reverse lethal. What a 5Head Pepega.
The dude had leather so early but was distracted by throwing around extra monsters for no damn reason
This dude doesn’t read a single card just play blindfolded and probably didn’t know what otk is, i can’t believe how baffling this guy action is by sacrificing his own borrelsword, unicorn and everything for an Apollousa with 2 negates
When you beat ultimatness with a tribute monster
"A lot of broken stuff is legal in Master Duel"
This is my favorite part of the game so far
Yeah, they hit benten and eva. Would love to play drytron without the stigma cause space fortress dragon is cool
What is cool?
@@alicepbg2042 the actual boss monsters of the drytron archtype: Meteornis draconids and Meteornis quadrantids.
The worst drytron player I've ever seen. Glad he lose
Every Herald Drytron is worst player, no exception
Definitely the worst, jeez the stuff that he could've actually done is waaaay better than what people think
I play a hero deck and the interaction between Masked Hero Dark Law and card effects that need to be sent to the graveyard in order to activate is pretty interesting, dark law counters those kind of decks that rely heavily on it. My friend and I was testing out to see if cards like forbidden droplet worked but nope :D because card cannot activate effect since cards cannot be sent to the graveyard since they were going to be banished instead due to dark law's effect.
This is why first turn for HERO is very important. Dark Law might not prevent hand trap to stop them due to 'discard' but at least it protects the board from droplets, and disrupt Drytron and VW.
I considered teching in Dark Law into shaddoll-invoked since mask change 2 just makes dark law into a generic extra deck and a extra deck Macro cosmos but i only have one of each so not too consistent.
The first time I played against Drytrons, I went first and got Dark Law on the field. They banished a card they needed to send to the graveyard to get their herald synchro monster out (something about changing the level of a card to the level of a card sent to the GY). I didn't realize I had accidentally just beat the deck everyone was complaining about until later when I saw the full combo.
Prime example of why not to surrender turn 1 when u see meta, i beat full power VW with a deck i built to gain lp for the challenge and they lost because of lp difference burn card after like 60 turns, was crazy.
Hey man, can i get the decklist? Im trying to do the challenge as well
It is still UNBELIEVABLE how you manage to win that. Insane luck to be honest, that Drytron player had everything to control you and he didn't use it, still baffles me.
Ultimateness weakness is the hand. It requires fairys to use its negate effect and I believe the opponent didn't had any more at that point and time.
@@fruitybluieblue098 ultimateness cant negate bc cost is discard TO GY iirc. And he cant bc Macro
Herald has to send to GY to negate, so Macro stopped it entirely, the only effect he had was Borrelsword's
Herald of Ultimateness is my favorite card, but I don't play anymore cause this game is just not fun, but since when is Herald being used? I love the card art and I feel its fair since you have to discard for each negate and is a level 12 ritual, how tf did the meta make a deck that makes me feel guilty for using that card?
Eva
See before, Ultimateness was just a cool super gimmicky card with a strong effect that was impossible to summon. However, several keys mistakes were made that made the card so oppressive in Drytron
1. Meteonis Drytron is generic, the biggest mistake. It gives Drytron the ability to summon whatever they want without having to use other ritual spells, allowing them to completely abuse certain cards never meant to be played in a combo deck, such as Cyber Angel Benten or Ultimateness
2. Meteonis Drytron can ritual summon cards in the graveyard and recurs insanely easily, meaning that one card can Ritual Summon Benten and later Ultimateness in the same turn. Consistency is way up because you literally only have to run 4 ritual monsters, every other card can be a hand trap or resource generator, something that no Ritual Deck has ever had. Even if you don’t draw the Ultimateness, sending it to the graveyard (via Foolish Burial or Beatrice) and then Ritual Summoning it out is just as good
3. Eva allows for extremely easy searches of Combo Pieces, but also Ultimateness fuel, every Eva is essentially two more omni-summon negates. Along with Union Carrier, which significantly helps to activate Eva’s effect, the deck is absurdly consistent.
4. The Drytron Cards allow you to not have to genuinely expend massive resources to summon Ultimateness, meaning you still have huge field presence to make other XYZ or Link Monsters
5. The Herald Cards have support cards, just as Diviner of The Herald, which lets you send Herald Of The Arc Light from the extra deck to the grave to immediately search a Meteonis Drytron and Herald Of The Orange Light, which is a monster negating handtrap, which only improves their consistency and disruptive capabilities even more
Drytron is a deck with almost perfect consistency, as this is easily possible by just opening 2 Drytron monsters, Incredible Field presence, immense resilience to distruption, the means to easily summon a card that will almost certainly win them the duel if their opponent doesn’t draw 1 of like 5 cards and allows for a “Ritual Toolbox”, things unheard of in a Ritual deck until now. That’s why Ultimateness went from gimmicky to absurdly oppressive and hated boss monsters
The engine for Ultimateness was the problem here, not the actual card itself since it is supposed to have limited negates depending on your hand and because Dryton enables it, it should be obvious the problem is the combo pieces, like Duel Logs said, They should do what they did for the tcg hit for stopping Herald. It won't totally cripple Dryton and won't make Herald as much as degenerate as it is now.
Uhhh
Drytron's gimmick for ritual summoning is to use the Machine monster's attack points instead of levels to ritual summon
And... Guess what Herald of Ultimateness' attack points are?????
honestly that's exactly why i never give up in any game. You'd be amazed how one idiotic move causes the opp to lose everything xD
Sometimes, I am that idiotic opponent lmao
He couldn't negate since ultimateness needs to send a card to the graveyard and since Macro Cosmos is on the field cards are banished instead of hitting the grave.
drytrons : check
ecclesia profile picture : check
platinum border : check
kys as username : check
you got yourself a edgy teenagers that always plays solo in an MMO and picks the dual wielding class.
Is that shit art online reference?
Didn't they already have lethal on summoning Borrelsword, or is there something in Herald of Ultimateness/ the way Herald was summoned that keeps it from attacking directly? If not they could've changed Herald to attack position, swung over Survivor with Borrelsword, attacked with Herald, then changed Herald to defence for the second Borrelsword attack right?
3900-900= 3000, +2000= 5000, +3900= 8900
I remember once i defeated a drytron because he didnt negate my dimension fissue
this is my new favorite yugioh channel
omfg that blimd ash blossom was hilarious! Made my day haha
love co...blocking Dryton - once put stormwind barrier down, and it was hilarious
I chuckled so hard when you activated a second Macro 🤣
My first ranked duel ever in Master Duel (I'm a returning player who hasn't touched yugioh since 2008 but been watching duel logs for 2 years now) was vs drytrons and they also got the herald out. Managed to stall long enough to get my combo's going in an AWFUL T.G. synchro deck meant to summon Shooting Quasar and the guy ended up rage quitting on the 9th turn, played through enough negates and stalled just long enough. There's no way I should have won that LOL.
The first time I played Drytrons, I had summoned Dark Law turn one, and they accidentally banished a card they needed to send to the graveyard to get their plays going. I didn't even realize it was Drytrons until later because the guy pulled out so fast.
Banishing almost beats any modern day decks except floowandereeze they love being banished.
I wanna make a heraldless drytron deck an see how that works (too bad it's still gonna have Vanity's ruler).
Ah yes, whenever someone activates macro cosmos on me, my first thought is "let me ash that" as well. Only a true gamer has this mindset.
Ash Blossom yes clicker, I love those
Great game. Loved seeing the power of old floodgates against a bad meta player.
Imo the Ash was an okay move but the plays after that were sloppy imao. Unicorn wasn't that terrible a play but he should have stuck with it and stall with a 2200 beatstick. Personally I would have kept the Borrelsword and Knightmare Phoenix and go for old-school beatdown. Keep the win-con, even if it's riskier.
macro cosmos and other continuous banish effects means they cant use herald ultimate effect.. As they have to send to "grave" for its effect and they cant do that as the card will be sent to void instead.
Konami: prints broken cards with difficult summoning conditions
Also Konami: prints cards that go around summoning condition
Game: I'm in danger
I played the exact same deck u were playing in my ds ygo 5ds game
Anyone know the exact list for the Monarch deck? Would love to try it
You ever just... press buttons? That's Drytrons baby.
yugioh community with the positive vibes as always!!!
Serves that drayton player right.
basically once macro is activated, any card that needs to send itself or another card to the GY is useless since it will get banished instead (which isn't included in it's cost) thats why herald is useless once macro is face-up, most hand-traps are too...
Drytron, full combo, loses to D.D. Survivor. Can't make this up, lmao.
The drytron missed lethal on second turn by not attacking with herald of ultimateness then used borrelsword on herald to attack face twice while including 200 dmg from herald
He missed a shit ton of opportunities, he's really bad at playing the game in general but also his own deck
I play pure Drytrons and trust me this deck can do incredible things
Found this guy while playing my dumb scrap deck. I won without question and made herald cry
Rosemi Duel Logs collab would be so sick
I lost it when he link off his borrelsword
You know your opponent's doomed when they Set Maxx "C".
Lol, this duel should be duel of the year xD
The one where Duel Log's opponent top decked rank-up magic IS duel of the year.
a video with a yugioh deck I understand this is great!
I think I dueled that same guy! Same deck same icon! I’ll check when I get home
Macro Monarchs? Pog. Best old deck
We do be out here surviving.
Gladiators with Dim Fissure is Chefs Kiss by the way.
This deck looks pretty fun, decklist please?
Loooks like ur oponent gonna commit to his username
Wait...he plays herald...in a dryton deck!?
*i hAVe NevER SeEn tHis bEfoRE*
I'm still confused on this YGO ruling because technically new player. When you chain/activate Continuous/Field Spell/Traps as chain link X, do their effects IMMEDIATELY apply? That's what my brain's logic told me, which led me to once not omni negate an activated Mystic Mine on duelingbook because I thought they immediately apply. But a friend told me later you would still have one last chance to interact before the "activation is fully resolved" and their effects start to apply. It's as if Cont/Field S/Ts have to be in some invisible "floating resolution zone" just like normal S/Ts before their effects start to apply?
Is it similarly applicable to 2:40 here where the Drytron player had one final chance to negate the Macro? Since after Macro resolves successfully neither player can send cards to the GY anymore which renders the Herald negates unactivatable since it sends cards to GY for cost.
Yes, the opponent could've negated Macro Cosmos with Herald since Macro Cosmos hadn't resolved yet, therefore its effects aren't yet applying.
Continuous effects are only applied once the resolution of activation or summon is completed, additionally, destroying a Continuous Spell/Trap or a Field Spell actually will fizzle the resolution of any On Field or When Played From Hand activated effect they might have, eg if I play Aroma Gardening, summon an Aroma and activate its "Gain 1000 LP" trigger, and you chain MST to pop it, my Gardening doesn't heal me
Why ash to cosmos?because drytron player can't read, they just straight-up negate anything when there's any pop-up alert for chain
If they have it I don't know about it but they should make a floodgate that floodgates negates.
Ah yes the time when herald is the most hated boss monster
this felt so good to watch
They basically killed trons herald in TCG, can't wait for MD to do the same
i cant understand why he doesnt ip to unicorn right away instead of borrelsword to get rid of macro cosmos, when he ended up sacrificing his borrelsword to unicorn anyway..
Macro shuts down Eldlich, True Draco, etc.. Y'all need to unlimit it like OCG..
Shuts down 99% of decks
We have Macro Cosmos on legs called Dimension Shifter.
The TCG has some really dumb bans and limits. But goodness Master Duel is going crazy on what is and is not limited/banned 🤣
The moment macro resolved,herald was negated
Guy with a meta deck facing the heart of the cards 😂
I’ve never seen a drytron player surrender, this would be the first and probably last we seen that
I made a Drytron player surrender once with Endymion. iirc I got Secret Village of the Spellcasters out and they just had no way around it.
I have seen drytron players surrender after I summoned dark law going first with my hero deck, pretty satisfying
so actualy he made a lot of mistakes. 👓
Could we get the decklist for this?
also, I have a hilarious story involving me winning because my opponent used mirror force.
I almost, with a turn 2 hand, brute forced through all of herald’s negates. Then eva went to gy, so I lost
If anybody knows could you make a list of the cards used in this deck.
macro cosmos is always good against drytron and eldlich players. just take your 1st turn, set that and they will think twice for sending their cards to the gy
they already limit it for years
@@Keldeo-gx not in MD and OCG
now I need a deck list
When the Macro is Cosmos
it's really hard watching this drytron player made a lot of mistakes. I can pardon the ash, but the others? man like he didnt even read the cards properly.
Love how the drytron player has a toxic user name
he expects the enemy to concede the moment they saw drytron cards
How is "kyss your sister" a toxic name? I thin is an inspiring name
Hey Mister Logs, could you give us the deck list. I really liked this deck, and i want to troll my friend.