Thank you for this. It was sort of but not quite a detailed list of ALL the things this Pope has said or done. I remember when he came out with a Martin Luther Commemoration stamp and wasn’t it done on Oct 13?? Things like that were done. I started paying attention to this and when I saw the Nativity Scene at the Vatican? about 3 years ago that was absolutely horrifying!! The Cancellation of Great clergy is a Yuge clue too and how about the Vatican University that JPII started or whatever that was suddenly shut down??! Where are the Faithful Catholics in Rome, the regular lay people? You don’t have to be Trad to see what’s going on if you only start paying attention. Who was that woman who came there that Promoted Abortion a few years ago? And why did Bergolio receive The Clintons? How is it that NoONE talks about Jill Biden donning a rosary Necklace in Africa to promote Abortion or Contraception and continues to be called a Catholic? The African Bishops did disagree with the efforts but I wish they would’ve named BIDENS AS A FAKE CATHOLIC!!! I would love a total compilation done someday but I know it’s hard to remember. There’s just soooooooo many calamities and the Pachiemaama is so horrible, it’s a wonder we’re all still here. Please Lord, help your people 😭. St. Augustine and St. Thomas AQUINAS PLEASE PRAY FOR US. 🇺🇸 🇻🇦 🌎🙏🙋🏻♀️
Yesterday, I completed my 4th out of five Saturdays to Our Lady's devotion. This is the fist time I've done this in my life and I've been devoted to Our Lady since about 1980.
Thank you for sharing this. As God would have it, your words here have provided the encouragement I have needed to preserve. You are truly an instrument in God’s hand 🙏🏼
I finally got my first one done. I’ve been trying for years. I don’t know why it was so hard to start. I know that there is someone who would like me not to do it but our Lady will prevail.
Thank you for your comment. If you would like to see the entire presentation, it can be found on SpiritusTV. God bless you. spiritustv.com/watch/a-deep-winter-eleven-years-under-francis-by-christopher-a-ferrara-fc24-dallas-tx_VsjHdXjzBEOMRPH.html
I've done every First Friday and First Saturday for for over a year, and I will continue until we get back to the Bishops ( including the Bishop of Rome ! ) allow the teachings of ACTUAL CATHOLICISM ( The Deposit of Faith ) and they eradicate receiving OUR LORD in the hand, and Allow The TRADITIONAL Latin Mass everywhere!
I always do the first Saturdays, but every time the fifth one comes, it gets canceled by the church or sometimes my grandchildren, first Communion or confirmations. So I start again ,yesterday. I did send in my first one in December to you but cannot remember my password. So I give up reporting them. I have done with my husband December, January, February, March, April. ...now starting again in June yesterday.
For years, I’ve been trying to do the first Saturday devotion and if I get it done once I am invariably don’t do it the second time because I forget or something. So I am always at day one
The problem did not begin with Vatican II. The problem is not fundamentally one of bad teaching, but rather one of invalid authority. The problem began with the 1958 concave. It produced a pope for 5 minutes, according to the white smoke that was deliberately intended to communicate that information. And then black smoke told us that our 5 minute pope no longer existed. But there could not have been a valid resignation of that pope, because no such resignation was properly and publicly manifested according to Canon law. Therefore the 5 minute pope remained the valid pope. And therefore Roncalli was not a valid pope. And therefore Vatican II was not presided over by a valid pope, and consequently was not a valid council.
Deception is satan’s greatest tool in his evil attempts to destroy souls, in his hatred of ALL human beings, especially those who indignantly follow ‘the father of lies, a murderer from the very beginning.’
@@ryanscottlogan8459 I'm not 'alleging' anything. I am applying reason to evidence. The issue is not legal proof, but actual truth. And you don't need a cardinal testifying under oath to come to actual truth. Where applying reason to evidence suffices to come to the truth, the truth thus discovered does indeed stand as truth. Below is an expanded analysis. If in it you find a fault in my application of reason to evidence, feel free to speak your mind. When a conclave takes place, it is conducted in strict secrecy. But there is one item of information in it that is deliberately communicated to the whole world. And that is, that when a new pope is elected and has accepted and has chosen his new name, white smoke is sent up the chimney. The white smoke is a deliberate type of speech, containing a specific and intended meaning. The white smoke of a concave is the visible communication of a particular reality, namely that a pope was elected and that a pope has accepted, that a solemn covenant between God and a new pope has been made. This is what is factually known of the 1958 conclave: at one point early in the conclave, white smoke came out the chimney for over 5 minutes. For 5 minutes the conclave was deliberately communicating to the world that a new pope had been elected and had accepted and had chosen his new name. We have no grounds to suggest that it was all some kind of a mistake. To do so would be unjustifiable speculation. Are we really competent to assert that for 5 full minutes the cardinals just didn't know that the smoke was white? That they couldn't hear the wild cheering of the very large crowd immediately outside, cheering in reaction to the white smoke announcement that a new pope now rules the Church? That the cardinals couldn't hear the bells ring in jubilation? Or that the cardinals just didn't know how to turn the smoke black? All such speculation is simply preposterous. Along with the white smoke, the bells of St. Peter’s rang out to announce the election of a new pope. Swiss Guards went to their proper stations to prepare for the new pope. Vatican Radio announced, “There can be absolutely no doubt. A pope has been elected!” Surmising that the white smoke, a long 5 minutes of white smoke, was a mistake is without factual justification. It is in fact nonsensical. We must admit that the 5 minutes of white smoke actually did mean what those 5 minutes of white smoke were deliberately intended to mean: that for 5 minutes we did in fact have a new pope. Imagine if you had been present in the crowd at St Peters as the white smoke continued to billow out from the chimney top. What if someone had said to you, “The white smoke doesn't mean anything. We can't really know if the pope has been elected. We have no idea what's going on in there.” The people in the crowd would have looked at the speaker as though he were a man from Mars. They would have said, “Of course the white smoke means something. That's why they send white smoke out through the chimney top, to communicate to us that a new pope has been chosen.” And of course the crowd would have been right. There was no deception in the white smoke. When this new pope accepted the papal office, he did so before God Himself. God immediately Himself accepted this new pope’s acceptance of the papal office. A solemn covenant, at that new pope’s moment of acceptance, was made between God and the new pope. Did this new pope after 5 minutes then decide to negate his acceptance, that is to depart from his office? To the essential point, did he validly resign his new office as pope? He and God had come to a solemn mutual agreement about his being pope. The only way this agreement could be broken would be by a second mutual agreement. And the only way this could be accomplished is by the new pope following the rules of God as expressed in the Canon law of His Church. No one can simply informally turn his back on a solemn agreement with God. One must go through the proper process for nullifying a solemn agreement. That is, one must satisfy the requirements of Canon law for such a situation. Perhaps an example of this would be a marriage. A couple may be convinced that their marriage is not valid for some reason. But they can't make this decision all by themselves. They must go through the proper procedures set forth in Canon law. It is analogously the same for a pope. It can be said with confidence that there could have been no valid canon law resignation from this new pope. Canon 332 sub 2 states that a papal resignation must be properly manifested. Therefore it cannot be secret or private. So if a pope is elected in a conclave and he accepts, but 5 minutes later this new pope changes his mind and quits, but does not manifest this ‘resignation’ properly and publicly and in full accord with Canon law, his ‘resignation’ is not valid and he remains pope. Possibly whoever had been first elected pope in 1958 felt that his change of mind alone was sufficient to negate his previous acceptance. That may explain why he never later acted or spoke as though he were pope. As it is virtually impossible that the 5-minute pope died before Roncalli was elected, it is virtually impossible that Roncalli was validly elected. Therefore Roncalli (AKA Pope John XXIII) could not have been a valid pope. And therefore there was no valid pope presiding when Vatican II opened. And therefore Vatican II itself was not a valid council. Also, it is highly unlikely that Montini (AKA Pope Paul VI) was valid, for the same reason Roncalli was not. [If the 1958 white smoke pope happened to be Cardinal Siri, then the next two John Paul popes were also invalid.]
Would Chris Ferrara Please comment on Dictator Pope by Henry Sire as well as Lost Shepherd by Philip Lawler and Vigano video Unprecedented Apostasy this First Sunday in June once known as Saint Peter Feast Day Month and now Gay Pride month ?
June is the month of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and it’s exceptionally horrible that the alphabet community took this month as theirs. It’s bad enough that they insult God by using the rainbow, which is his sign.
*Edit: It's available on Rumble now: rumble.com/v4zckql-a-deep-winter-eleven-years-under-francis-by-christopher-a.-ferrara-fc24-dal.html Our apologies. For the moment it is available only on SpiritusTV. spiritustv.com/watch/a-deep-winter-eleven-years-under-francis-by-christopher-a-ferrara-fc24-dallas-tx_VsjHdXjzBEOMRPH.html.
It didn’t start with Vatican 2, that is so wrong as it was planned by Latin saying priests and bishops for 100 years before the 1960s. They were already there, just waiting their time. If you don’t understand that, then you understand nothing.
Not for the first time I have my viewing of serious issues interrupted by some doubtless worthy endeavour ,in this case a Fatima council ,to promote or advertise an event ..it seems a particularly American tendency (i am British)to be flogging something or someone or appealing for money..I know these are important but I'd rather decide when to canvass or research support agencies myself
You are not following the precepts pf the church you claim to love by publicly or otherwise by chastising the chosen pontif, not so sure are loving lady of Fatima would approve, but ask you to pray for him. I honor the 1st Saturdays for our Lady, and Fridays for the Sacred Heart of Jesus through St Joesph. God Bless you ,I will pray for you and the Pope .❤
No, don’t abandon the holy Church of Christ, stay and pray as St. Catherine of Siena did at the times of doubts and troubles about the real Pope ❤Trust in almighty God and the Immaculate Heart of Mary and do pray the Rosary.Our strength depends on Our faith in Almighty God, our togetherness in prayer and the Holy Sacraments,and the defense of our beliefs; Christ said,” behold l am coming soon, bringing my recompense to repay everyone for what he has done.”(Revalation 22.12).
@@hollytreelodge No, its the one non holy, corrupted and failing church, in part due to Frankie, but its been going on for centuries. Can you say "cardinal" Law? No one wants to talk about what he did..or didnt do.
Fortunately Christ left us His Church of which He is the head. The pope is supposed to be His vicar on earth, but there have been many weak men who have sat in Peter's Chair. Our faith is in Christ, not the pope.
This is total rubbish. No one has the right to criticise the Pope because of personal animosity and hubris. Pope Francis is a wonderful holy man and is leading the Church at a time of great difficulty. Wars and an enthronement of personal ideology has challenged the bark of Peter, coming from people who oppose God’s chosen vicar, because they do not know Jesus. They should read St Ignatius Of Loyola’s rules for thinking with the Church.
Francis has: Backed the UN sustainable development goals, which call for the implementation of universal abortion and contraception. Appointed pro-abortion members to the Pontifical Academy for Life. Appointed population controllers to the Pontifical Academy for Science. Repeatedly denied dozens of Catholic doctrines, including on Hell, capital punishment, and divine grace Persecuted Cardinals and Bishops who have tried to remain faithful to Christ. Mocked faithful Catholics. Protected sex abusers. Welcomed and praised openly homosexual and transgender activists.
+JMJ Personal hubris? I doubt it. What pope uses vile language routinely against people or bullies people like an arrogant tinpot tyrant? What pope covers up sexual abuse or spouts heresy? Bergoglio may have excommunicated himself. He faces a terrible day before the Lord. If you're even Catholic which I seriously doubt, you're under a duty to not follow false teaching or criminal conduct. The Head of holy Church is our Lord Jesus Christ and not a pope. If today you hear His voice harden not your heart.
We definitely have a right to criticize Bergoglio. He has done so many things that were so outrageous and against the church. It was the feast of the immaculate conception in 2015 when I literally jumped off the couch when I saw that he had animal holograms all over the Vatican because you know nature is so important. I am an extreme animal lover, but on the feast of the immaculate conception you don’t mention the blessed mother, but you talk about environmental issues? That was the beginning of my realization that this man does not belong where he is.
+JMJ We have a duty under Canon 212 to bring to the attention of the Church a pope's false teaching for the good of the Church. Bergoglio is arrogant, bigoted and has covered up sexual abuse. He is hardly a "wonderful and holy man." He violates the very words of the Lord.
Here's the *ACTUAL* full video on rumble: rumble.com/v4zckql-a-deep-winter-eleven-years-under-francis-by-christopher-a.-ferrara-fc24-dal.html
Thank you for this. It was sort of but not quite a detailed list of ALL the things this Pope has said or done.
I remember when he came out with a Martin Luther Commemoration stamp and wasn’t it done on Oct 13?? Things like that were done. I started paying attention to this and when I saw the Nativity Scene at the Vatican? about 3 years ago that was absolutely horrifying!! The Cancellation of Great clergy is a Yuge clue too and how about the Vatican University that JPII started or whatever that was suddenly shut down??! Where are the Faithful Catholics in Rome, the regular lay people? You don’t have to be Trad to see what’s going on if you only start paying attention. Who was that woman who came there that Promoted Abortion a few years ago? And why did Bergolio receive The Clintons? How is it that NoONE talks about Jill Biden donning a rosary Necklace in Africa to promote Abortion or Contraception and continues to be called a Catholic? The African Bishops did disagree with the efforts but I wish they would’ve named BIDENS AS A FAKE CATHOLIC!!!
I would love a total compilation done someday but I know it’s hard to remember. There’s just soooooooo many calamities and the Pachiemaama is so horrible, it’s a wonder we’re all still here.
Please Lord, help your people 😭. St. Augustine and St. Thomas AQUINAS PLEASE PRAY FOR US. 🇺🇸 🇻🇦 🌎🙏🙋🏻♀️
Yesss!!! Every Friday devoted to our Lord and every Saturday devoted to His Blessed Mother ❤
Yesterday, I completed my 4th out of five Saturdays to Our Lady's devotion. This is the fist time I've done this in my life and I've been devoted to Our Lady since about 1980.
Thank you for sharing this.
As God would have it, your words here have provided the encouragement I have needed to preserve. You are truly an instrument in God’s hand 🙏🏼
Congratulations!!! It's not as easy as it seems.
I finally got my first one done. I’ve been trying for years. I don’t know why it was so hard to start. I know that there is someone who would like me not to do it but our Lady will prevail.
They opened the window for fresh air and let in the Prince of the Air!
Let's also do the First Fridays in reparation to the Sacred Heart of Jesus.
Very good - thank you 🔥👏😎!
God bless, Ave Maria 🙏⛪⚓👑.
Being this is about Francis, I am glad its only 8 1/2 mins. Pax Christi!
good comment
Thank you for your comment. If you would like to see the entire presentation, it can be found on SpiritusTV. God bless you.
spiritustv.com/watch/a-deep-winter-eleven-years-under-francis-by-christopher-a-ferrara-fc24-dallas-tx_VsjHdXjzBEOMRPH.html
Now is the Winter of our Dis-Content!
🙏🙏🙏🌟
I've done every First Friday and First Saturday for for over a year, and I will continue until we get back to the Bishops ( including the Bishop of Rome ! ) allow the teachings of ACTUAL CATHOLICISM ( The Deposit of Faith ) and they eradicate receiving OUR LORD in the hand, and Allow The TRADITIONAL Latin Mass everywhere!
I call him Bergolio as he requested, because HE REJECTED THE TRADITIONAL PAPAL TITLE!!!
I just call him Frankie.
I always do the first Saturdays, but every time the fifth one comes, it gets canceled by the church or sometimes my grandchildren, first Communion or confirmations. So I start again ,yesterday. I did send in my first one in December to you but cannot remember my password. So I give up reporting them. I have done with my husband December, January, February, March, April. ...now starting again in June yesterday.
For years, I’ve been trying to do the first Saturday devotion and if I get it done once I am invariably don’t do it the second time because I forget or something. So I am always at day one
The problem did not begin with Vatican II. The problem is not fundamentally one of bad teaching, but rather one of invalid authority.
The problem began with the 1958 concave. It produced a pope for 5 minutes, according to the white smoke that was deliberately intended to communicate that information. And then black smoke told us that our 5 minute pope no longer existed. But there could not have been a valid resignation of that pope, because no such resignation was properly and publicly manifested according to Canon law. Therefore the 5 minute pope remained the valid pope. And therefore Roncalli was not a valid pope. And therefore Vatican II was not presided over by a valid pope, and consequently was not a valid council.
🤭
Deception is satan’s greatest tool in his evil attempts to destroy souls, in his hatred of ALL human beings, especially those who indignantly follow ‘the father of lies, a murderer from the very beginning.’
There is no proof whatsoever of what you allege because no Cardinal has ever alleged such under oath.
@@ryanscottlogan8459
I'm not 'alleging' anything. I am applying reason to evidence.
The issue is not legal proof, but actual truth. And you don't need a cardinal testifying under oath to come to actual truth. Where applying reason to evidence suffices to come to the truth, the truth thus discovered does indeed stand as truth.
Below is an expanded analysis. If in it you find a fault in my application of reason to evidence, feel free to speak your mind.
When a conclave takes place, it is conducted in strict secrecy. But there is one item of information in it that is deliberately communicated to the whole world. And that is, that when a new pope is elected and has accepted and has chosen his new name, white smoke is sent up the chimney.
The white smoke is a deliberate type of speech, containing a specific and intended meaning. The white smoke of a concave is the visible communication of a particular reality, namely that a pope was elected and that a pope has accepted, that a solemn covenant between God and a new pope has been made.
This is what is factually known of the 1958 conclave: at one point early in the conclave, white smoke came out the chimney for over 5 minutes. For 5 minutes the conclave was deliberately communicating to the world that a new pope had been elected and had accepted and had chosen his new name.
We have no grounds to suggest that it was all some kind of a mistake. To do so would be unjustifiable speculation. Are we really competent to assert that for 5 full minutes the cardinals just didn't know that the smoke was white? That they couldn't hear the wild cheering of the very large crowd immediately outside, cheering in reaction to the white smoke announcement that a new pope now rules the Church? That the cardinals couldn't hear the bells ring in jubilation? Or that the cardinals just didn't know how to turn the smoke black?
All such speculation is simply preposterous.
Along with the white smoke, the bells of St. Peter’s rang out to announce the election of a new pope. Swiss Guards went to their proper stations to prepare for the new pope. Vatican Radio announced, “There can be absolutely no doubt. A pope has been elected!”
Surmising that the white smoke, a long 5 minutes of white smoke, was a mistake is without factual justification. It is in fact nonsensical.
We must admit that the 5 minutes of white smoke actually did mean what those 5 minutes of white smoke were deliberately intended to mean: that for 5 minutes we did in fact have a new pope.
Imagine if you had been present in the crowd at St Peters as the white smoke continued to billow out from the chimney top. What if someone had said to you, “The white smoke doesn't mean anything. We can't really know if the pope has been elected. We have no idea what's going on in there.”
The people in the crowd would have looked at the speaker as though he were a man from Mars. They would have said, “Of course the white smoke means something. That's why they send white smoke out through the chimney top, to communicate to us that a new pope has been chosen.”
And of course the crowd would have been right. There was no deception in the white smoke.
When this new pope accepted the papal office, he did so before God Himself. God immediately Himself accepted this new pope’s acceptance of the papal office. A solemn covenant, at that new pope’s moment of acceptance, was made between God and the new pope.
Did this new pope after 5 minutes then decide to negate his acceptance, that is to depart from his office? To the essential point, did he validly resign his new office as pope?
He and God had come to a solemn mutual agreement about his being pope. The only way this agreement could be broken would be by a second mutual agreement. And the only way this could be accomplished is by the new pope following the rules of God as expressed in the Canon law of His Church.
No one can simply informally turn his back on a solemn agreement with God. One must go through the proper process for nullifying a solemn agreement. That is, one must satisfy the requirements of Canon law for such a situation.
Perhaps an example of this would be a marriage. A couple may be convinced that their marriage is not valid for some reason. But they can't make this decision all by themselves. They must go through the proper procedures set forth in Canon law.
It is analogously the same for a pope.
It can be said with confidence that there could have been no valid canon law resignation from this new pope. Canon 332 sub 2 states that a papal resignation must be properly manifested. Therefore it cannot be secret or private.
So if a pope is elected in a conclave and he accepts, but 5 minutes later this new pope changes his mind and quits, but does not manifest this ‘resignation’ properly and publicly and in full accord with Canon law, his ‘resignation’ is not valid and he remains pope.
Possibly whoever had been first elected pope in 1958 felt that his change of mind alone was sufficient to negate his previous acceptance. That may explain why he never later acted or spoke as though he were pope.
As it is virtually impossible that the 5-minute pope died before Roncalli was elected, it is virtually impossible that Roncalli was validly elected. Therefore Roncalli (AKA Pope John XXIII) could not have been a valid pope. And therefore there was no valid pope presiding when Vatican II opened. And therefore Vatican II itself was not a valid council.
Also, it is highly unlikely that Montini (AKA Pope Paul VI) was valid, for the same reason Roncalli was not. [If the 1958 white smoke pope happened to be Cardinal Siri, then the next two John Paul popes were also invalid.]
@@davegaetano7118 So in only 5 minutes all this happened and not one Cardinal ever admitted it happened even the arch conservatives Cardinals?😂😂😂
Would Chris Ferrara Please comment on Dictator Pope by Henry Sire as well as Lost Shepherd by Philip Lawler and Vigano video Unprecedented Apostasy this First Sunday in June once known as Saint Peter Feast Day Month and now Gay Pride month ?
June is the month of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and it’s exceptionally horrible that the alphabet community took this month as theirs. It’s bad enough that they insult God by using the rainbow, which is his sign.
The full talk is not on Rumble. Where can it be found?
*Edit: It's available on Rumble now: rumble.com/v4zckql-a-deep-winter-eleven-years-under-francis-by-christopher-a.-ferrara-fc24-dal.html
Our apologies. For the moment it is available only on SpiritusTV.
spiritustv.com/watch/a-deep-winter-eleven-years-under-francis-by-christopher-a-ferrara-fc24-dallas-tx_VsjHdXjzBEOMRPH.html.
Ill call him 'frank'
I call him Antipope Bergoglio.
It didn’t start with Vatican 2, that is so wrong as it was planned by Latin saying priests and bishops for 100 years before the 1960s. They were already there, just waiting their time. If you don’t understand that, then you understand nothing.
First, it had 0 ta do with the language they were required to use. Second, nice try.
Not for the first time I have my viewing of serious issues interrupted by some doubtless worthy endeavour ,in this case a Fatima council ,to promote or advertise an event ..it seems a particularly American tendency (i am British)to be flogging something or someone or appealing for money..I know these are important but I'd rather decide when to canvass or research support agencies myself
Please pay attention! This conference took place in February 2024.
You are not following the precepts pf the church you claim to love by publicly or otherwise by chastising the chosen pontif, not so sure are loving lady of Fatima would approve, but ask you to pray for him. I honor the 1st Saturdays for our Lady, and Fridays for the Sacred Heart of Jesus through St Joesph. God Bless you ,I will pray for you and the Pope .❤
Not even Pope.
Bergoglio _plain._
How dare you criticise our Pope. Ask for his forgiveness.
He is a terrible pope. He should ask for our forgiveness.
I will criticise a heretic, an oppressor of true catholic faith and false prophet. He is a successor of judas iscariot not of Peter.
Cismatics here, nothing new
Modernists abound too.
Everyone complains about Frankie, but no one does anything about him.....such as leave and worship with others who believe as they do.
No, don’t abandon the holy Church of Christ, stay and pray as St. Catherine of Siena did at the times of doubts and troubles about the real Pope ❤Trust in almighty God and the Immaculate Heart of Mary and do pray the Rosary.Our strength depends on Our faith in Almighty God, our togetherness in prayer and the Holy Sacraments,and the defense of our beliefs; Christ said,” behold l am coming soon, bringing my recompense to repay everyone for what he has done.”(Revalation 22.12).
The Catholic Church is more than a bad pope! It's the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church.
Never leave the Catholic Church despite Francis et al. That would be abandoning Christ and putting our souls at great risk.
@@hollytreelodge No, its the one non holy, corrupted and failing church, in part due to Frankie, but its been going on for centuries.
Can you say "cardinal" Law?
No one wants to talk about what he did..or didnt do.
Fortunately Christ left us His Church of which He is the head. The pope is supposed to be His vicar on earth, but there have been many weak men who have sat in Peter's Chair. Our faith is in Christ, not the pope.
This is total rubbish. No one has the right to criticise the Pope because of personal animosity and hubris. Pope Francis is a wonderful holy man and is leading the Church at a time of great difficulty. Wars and an enthronement of personal ideology has challenged the bark of Peter, coming from people who oppose God’s chosen vicar, because they do not know Jesus. They should read St Ignatius Of Loyola’s rules for thinking with the Church.
Francis has:
Backed the UN sustainable development goals, which call for the implementation of universal abortion and contraception.
Appointed pro-abortion members to the Pontifical Academy for Life.
Appointed population controllers to the Pontifical Academy for Science.
Repeatedly denied dozens of Catholic doctrines, including on Hell, capital punishment, and divine grace
Persecuted Cardinals and Bishops who have tried to remain faithful to Christ.
Mocked faithful Catholics.
Protected sex abusers.
Welcomed and praised openly homosexual and transgender activists.
+JMJ Personal hubris? I doubt it. What pope uses vile language routinely against people or bullies people like an arrogant tinpot tyrant? What pope covers up sexual abuse or spouts heresy? Bergoglio may have excommunicated himself. He faces a terrible day before the Lord. If you're even Catholic which I seriously doubt, you're under a duty to not follow false teaching or criminal conduct. The Head of holy Church is our Lord Jesus Christ and not a pope. If today you hear His voice harden not your heart.
We definitely have a right to criticize Bergoglio. He has done so many things that were so outrageous and against the church. It was the feast of the immaculate conception in 2015 when I literally jumped off the couch when I saw that he had animal holograms all over the Vatican because you know nature is so important. I am an extreme animal lover, but on the feast of the immaculate conception you don’t mention the blessed mother, but you talk about environmental issues? That was the beginning of my realization that this man does not belong where he is.
+JMJ We have a duty under Canon 212 to bring to the attention of the Church a pope's false teaching for the good of the Church. Bergoglio is arrogant, bigoted and has covered up sexual abuse. He is hardly a "wonderful and holy man." He violates the very words of the Lord.
@@teacup3133 well said, those who say we have no right to criticize the pope are actually idolaters. They all idol worship a man.
A heretic! A disaster!!