Great argument by the lawyers . Divorce Case, MP High Court Live

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 вер 2022
  • ‪@TheLegalNow‬
    Great argument by the lawyers . Divorce Case
    Greatest debate ever in MP High Court
    The most interesting debate ever in the MP High Court regarding Divorce Case.
    MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
    MP HIGH COURT
    HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU J.
    MP High Court Live, High Court Live Streaming, Patna High Court Live Stream, Gujarat High Court Live Stream, Madhya Pradesh High Court Live Stream, MP High Court Live, Court Room Live Stream, Court Room, Legal Fact in India , Patna High Court Live Stream Today, Indian High Court live Stream
    argument before the honorable court
    argument before the hon'ble court
    argument before the judge
    argument before the hon'ble judge
    argument before the court by lawyer
    argument before the court by young lawyer
    argument before the court by advocate
    argument before the court by senior advocate
    court argument video in hindi
    court argument in hindi
    court argument video in india
    court argument in english in india
    court proceeding in india video
    court proceeding in hindi
    #law #judge #advocate #lawyer #livestream #court #courtlive #argument #criminaljusticelive #live #criminaljustice #courtroomlive #courtroomdrama #legaladvice #legaleducation #legal #guiltyminds #learnadvocacy #lawmotivation #powerofjudge #ias #ips #police #judiciary #motivation #learnlaw #supremecourtofindia #legalknowledge #legaleducation #younglawyers #highcourt #patnahighcourt #bihar #biharnews #courtproceedings #ipc #crpc #cpc #evidence #clat #lawentrance #biharjudiciary #biharjudicial #exams #bpsc #patnapolice #biharpolice
    video:-- • The judge got angry on...
    video:-2 • Part:-2 The judge got ...
    video:-3 • Part:-1 The judge got ...
    video:-4 • Video
    video:-5 • Wife has filed more th...
    video:-6 • The order of High Cour...
    video:-7 • Part:-2 The judge told...
    video:-8 • Bihar Police officers ...
    video :- 9 • Part:- 2 Argument betw...
    video:-10 • Part:- 1 Argument betw...
    Madhya Pradesh High Court

КОМЕНТАРІ • 137

  • @TarunKumar-uo5gn
    @TarunKumar-uo5gn 8 місяців тому +46

    In Satyug-Pati is Parmeshwar
    In Kalyug-Pati is ATM and Chad is my boyfriend🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @drpkc007
    @drpkc007 Рік тому +44

    Because of society and law , majorityy of Indian women wants ALIMONY /FREE MONEY ,and Indian MEN has to fork out huge amount

    • @rohi1255
      @rohi1255 11 місяців тому

      Because of this law, even the happily married wife is demanding, husband has got not word to say but just listen and accept

    • @yogitasingh2812
      @yogitasingh2812 11 місяців тому

      Dowry late hai uska kya

    • @sanketpatil9095
      @sanketpatil9095 11 місяців тому +8

      ​@@yogitasingh2812dowry is criminal offence but alimony is rights of women

    • @maxmax8431
      @maxmax8431 7 місяців тому +1

      ​@@yogitasingh2812dowry is criminal offense but alomny is legal
      Both are evil

    • @chetanshukla768
      @chetanshukla768 7 місяців тому

      And then they call themselves strong independent women 🤦‍♂️

  • @VijayKumar-eh4rf
    @VijayKumar-eh4rf Рік тому +100

    Marriage has become a curse in India. All laws and institutions are in favour of women.

    • @SK-kp8qj
      @SK-kp8qj 7 місяців тому

      Ya and for all valid reasons!

    • @lifegamerpro4033
      @lifegamerpro4033 7 місяців тому +4

      N we want aunties in parliament 😜

    • @Awesome46009
      @Awesome46009 7 місяців тому +3

      Are you not understanding?
      The husband has 11 years child and still tortured the mother of his child and then remarried with another girl. Matlab kya chahte ho bhai?

    • @success2089
      @success2089 5 місяців тому +3

      ​@@Awesome46009 If you threaten someone with false case there will be reaction and so it is his right to marry someone else

    • @Awesome46009
      @Awesome46009 5 місяців тому +1

      @@success2089 are you a judge?
      Without judgement how can one marry ? It is incorrect

  • @PhotonShower
    @PhotonShower 11 місяців тому +33

    Please dont get married..
    And if you are married..relax and be brave.. every thing can be fought in court..

  • @anamikachowdhury782
    @anamikachowdhury782 Рік тому +62

    Men do suffer without reasons as the law is just one sided in our country.
    As women we want equality everywhere but not in the system of law. There we women become abla, bechari!!!

    • @rlgl1
      @rlgl1 10 місяців тому +6

      You will be a good wife that I can assure, your upbringing is amazing

    • @Starwar99421
      @Starwar99421 10 місяців тому +5

      You earned my respect

    • @vivekkumar-ei7vz
      @vivekkumar-ei7vz 9 місяців тому +5

      Let every husband get a wife like you

    • @Awesome46009
      @Awesome46009 7 місяців тому

      Kya suffer kiya man ne ?
      Pehli biwi se 11 yr ka bacha h.. usko chhod k Bahar affair chalaya. Dusri biwi se b bacha Kar Liya. Suffer to pehli biwi kr rahi hai

  • @mandarp9472
    @mandarp9472 11 місяців тому +10

    Biased laws favouring women like 498 A, DV, HMA where wife have no responsibility.
    Husbands are always guilty by defaults and punished with heavy alimony, maintenance, no child custody and can be put into jail for not paying.

  • @harshitsharma6049
    @harshitsharma6049 6 місяців тому

    Now this is called argument 🎉

  • @saramainyugen8002
    @saramainyugen8002 5 місяців тому

    Danke!

  • @07dhiraj
    @07dhiraj Рік тому +29

    lol ... wife is PG doctor and doing fake 498A !! ...m not supporting any1 just she can appeal against divorce and file section 9 ... she herself weaken her case by negative approach ... there husband got chance & quickly re-married ... lol but suspended in bigamy i suppose bcz it was after 1st wife's appeal ... interesting case 💐💐👌👍☺️

    • @azmathmoosa4324
      @azmathmoosa4324 Рік тому +5

      man getting screwed by ssytem is "interesting case" for you. imagine this was your life. i dont understand why someone can't just let go of those who don't want to stay in the marriage.

    • @07dhiraj
      @07dhiraj Рік тому +8

      @@azmathmoosa4324 read my comment again ...m nt supporting women ... rather m in favour of men ... case is interesting bcz man remarried just after appeal ..had he remarried before appeal this case would have been dismissed in one shot ... pls read my commet again , in any way m nt supporting tht woman 💐💐

    • @kirtinagayach418
      @kirtinagayach418 Рік тому +6

      Why , second wife was in hurry so much , to marry a man , facing divorce case ? Could wait for some time ? Can she hope a good husband for her , who is so much cruel with wife n child .

    • @07dhiraj
      @07dhiraj Рік тому +9

      @@kirtinagayach418 those perceptions tht man will be good or bad only 2nd wife only can tell ... and waiting for divorce is stupidity as it easily takes decades for literally for divorce to get settled in India ... i guess nobody waits and wastes their youth for that 💐💐 ☺️☺️

    • @sachinraghuwanshi4917
      @sachinraghuwanshi4917 Рік тому +9

      @@kirtinagayach418 why should they ruin their golden period of life for a lazy women

  • @psychedelicexperience3564
    @psychedelicexperience3564 9 місяців тому +5

    If i had 100 rs whenever he said mylord. I'd be rich

  • @Aditya_sahuedit
    @Aditya_sahuedit 7 місяців тому +2

    Where is next part

  • @RupinderDhamija
    @RupinderDhamija 12 днів тому

    Only thing missing is popcorn in front of judge

  • @dhruvk6163
    @dhruvk6163 6 місяців тому +2

    The argument was great but both the male advocates were using the term my lord my lord again and again that was seriously pathetic by them.

  • @legen-dary
    @legen-dary Рік тому +9

    Count how many times he said my lord😂

  • @bijaybijay1502
    @bijaybijay1502 Рік тому

    Jai ho supreame court ke jajjo ki jai ho .jai ho.

  • @komalpawar659
    @komalpawar659 10 місяців тому +2

    Y advocate kon se hai senior..mujhe case ladawana h ense indore hight court me

  • @amitsuju
    @amitsuju Рік тому +21

    498A is a weapon in this country.

    • @misha1211
      @misha1211 11 місяців тому

      Not everytime

    • @amitsuju
      @amitsuju 11 місяців тому +4

      @@misha1211 obviously not everytime. But the fact that the law is inherently not designed to be specific and avoid unreasonable abuse makes it vulnerable and harmful to innocent people. Either it should be corrected or removed from ipc and something better should be brought.

    • @misha1211
      @misha1211 11 місяців тому

      @@amitsuju true, but in most cases the people who enforce the laws are at fault. Unless they do their job properly, the situation will remain chaotic.

    • @amitsuju
      @amitsuju 11 місяців тому +2

      @@misha1211 no, both abusers and enforcers are at fault. If there is a vulnerability in the system doesn't mean someone will be free of guilt or sin of abusing it. Women who abuse it are definitely at fault too.
      Just like men who abuse the position of power from a place of power are at fault.

    • @misha1211
      @misha1211 11 місяців тому

      @@amitsuju I'm not here defending women bro, real culprit whether women or men, can only be found if the people in charge do their work honestly. No law is flawless, what makes the difference is the people who enforce it.

  • @aninditosen3067
    @aninditosen3067 Рік тому +5

    I hear more My lord ... ... than normal argument

  • @NeerajYadav-yl2kl
    @NeerajYadav-yl2kl 7 місяців тому +5

    I just want prenup to be legal in india, they say we are pro-marriage and that’s why prenup is not legal as it’s an agreement before marriage but I think we should be pro-choice. If we are and going to be pro-marriage in future than there should be equal stand for both sexes either in alimony or custody whatever.

  • @sonikasharma8932
    @sonikasharma8932 7 місяців тому +1

    Thank you, my lord

    • @chetanshukla768
      @chetanshukla768 7 місяців тому

      God save us from women like you 🙏

  • @ankushmanhas5194
    @ankushmanhas5194 9 місяців тому

  • @madhuch5527
    @madhuch5527 Місяць тому +1

    judge first priority should be contempt petition. when someone has not obeyed earlier court judgement how can they expect she will obey now. Judge should see why contempt and next step.
    bring the child to court before that as per earlier order, allow the father for visitation child

  • @baktitsonnas6717
    @baktitsonnas6717 Рік тому +5

    Ye log marriage se phele kyu nei decision nei le pate .sala itna gadha couple zindegi me nei dekha sirf beautiful dekke mrg karna yahi phal hota he

  • @debjitdt
    @debjitdt 7 місяців тому +7

    It is ILLEGAL as well as IMMORAL to ask the child at this stage because the child was forced to stay more time with the mother and she has the opportunity to indoctrinated the child to talk in his favor and say whatever she wants in the court. The humble court should allow the child to stay with the father for same amount of time, and then ask the child's opinion.

    • @Awesome46009
      @Awesome46009 7 місяців тому +2

      Forced?
      The father has illegal wife and illegal child from that woman. Usko bache ka fikr hota to rangraliya nahi manaa raha hota father

    • @amrakshable
      @amrakshable 5 місяців тому

      You are right

  • @kalpanajain3822
    @kalpanajain3822 3 місяці тому +1

    Why in india people dont get justice easily... They have to fight for 10-15 years till then criminal are enjoying their life... Why so

  • @munavvarali4692
    @munavvarali4692 Рік тому

    Court no 5 indore live nahi hai

  • @tapandas2831
    @tapandas2831 Рік тому +1

    Count will now ensure providing Divorce Compensation/Alimony to every divorce women??????????????????????????!????....................

  • @trstrscit
    @trstrscit 24 дні тому +1

    When ur matter reaches court marriage is over. WHen child is brought up by mother in initial year, ur relationship is over. THere is no point in feeding lawyers family and entertain court jokers for decades.Remember Indians laws are cruel and extortionist.Find ways to escape

  • @veeryadav3488
    @veeryadav3488 Рік тому +4

    We all are mostly educated now these days .
    Lekin ye samajh nai aata ham indian m hi h jaha hundu rasthra banane ki maang h ya aaj bhi angrej hi lad rahe h

  • @Krishnan379
    @Krishnan379 Рік тому +2

    Indian law very bad service no good, y goin 25 years cases

  • @sonikasharma8932
    @sonikasharma8932 7 місяців тому +1

    Good judgement....

  • @susenjitbanik9376
    @susenjitbanik9376 Рік тому +9

    No ONE is correct ..if the marriage governed under the provision of Hindu or Special Marriage Act ....& if the wife succeeded in appeal...the second marriage would be vitiated if the provision of Section 15 or 30 respectfully of the said Acts are not complied with and the second marriage would be voidable one 😊 & further the condition relinquishing the custody of the child if he gets divorce clearly demonstrates the husband's love towards child 😃

    • @roshanpatnaik1902
      @roshanpatnaik1902 8 місяців тому

      What can the husband do? He had visitation rights, which were violated for last 2 years.
      How do you think the father is able to build relationship with child when courts don't ensure the adherence to their own order?

  • @nigga4615
    @nigga4615 Рік тому +1

    my lord
    my lord
    my lord

  • @paulfredrick6429
    @paulfredrick6429 Рік тому +3

    My Loud.

  • @trstrscit
    @trstrscit 24 дні тому

    Judge can hear a child who brought up with mother. Then un can hold referendum in PoK and Indian Kashmir by the same logic? If second is bad for India, how is it correct for a family??

  • @forstudy7545
    @forstudy7545 Рік тому +1

    Bhaiya mai meerut up me rehta hoo maine ews certificate kr liye apply kiya tha aaj gaya to wo log keh rahe hai apne gaav partapgarh tesil se bhi certificate banwa ke lao ki waha koi jameen nhi tabhi banega to bhaiya iska koi tareeka nhi hai kya jisse mai unhe proof de saku ki waha koi jameen nhi hai mujhe jee mains ka form bhi bharna hai dates paas aa rhi hai please help karo

  • @dipjyotibarman2236
    @dipjyotibarman2236 Рік тому +6

    Wahhh Kia baat hai😅 Bharat Desh ka nyayalay aur wo v dusre desho ki bhasha mai 😅 waah re nyay ke logo insan badalne nikla hai, Doglapan

  • @jayantaguha9548
    @jayantaguha9548 3 місяці тому

    The judges are interested in wasting time on issues which the lawyers are not interested in contesting

  • @Gudia-TheDoll
    @Gudia-TheDoll 10 місяців тому +1

    Why there are two judges?? Can anyone explain me as I am from different education background.

    • @desiboosterdose
      @desiboosterdose 8 місяців тому +1

      aits not trial.court. It is appellant court . And they always have 2 judges. May be because to take decision quickly and without any error

  • @user-ct1uq4pe6r
    @user-ct1uq4pe6r 7 місяців тому

    It is not clear as to how the trial court can proceed with contempt proceedings. It falls within the jurisdiction of the High Court. Probably the Hon’ble judges want to reserve their decision. Fixing of dt of DPC is a different matter. The official should have approached the CAT against the suspension order by the department. Mere filing of FIR cannot result in suspension. He should have been under police custody for more than 48 Hours. That doesn’t appear to be the fact of the case. He appears to have gone for 2nd marriage only after the time for appeal expired. So the conduct rule against bigamy is also not applicable. It is anther matter fir the appellate court to condone the delay and for any consequence arising out of the delay only the other party is responsible. In the whole episode, the employer IT dept, as usual appears to have over reacted. If he had been in custody beyond the prescribed time limit, suspension may be correct. But for matters falling within the jurisdiction of the appropriate court, it is not competent to decide the issue one way or the other. After all it is sub-judis. It is strange why the counsel for the Respondent Officialis not fighting the suspension order.

  • @ranjansarma2994
    @ranjansarma2994 9 місяців тому

    Isko kon senior advocate bnaya

  • @rahulvasudeva9303
    @rahulvasudeva9303 3 місяці тому

    Its amazed when judge asked from child where child wants to go. Obviously bacha jiske sath reha hai from childhood uska pyar uske sath hi hoga and waise bhi uska brain wash tou hoga hi when child asked from mother /father the reason for separation. No one potrays herself/himself a villian in the own story. Its a common sense. Courts are just doing time pass never go to court at last its a settlement in person but its ego of one party which not allow to settle the matter. most of the time its lady who wants to prove her mettle by misusing the baised law. Matrimonial case are all about Money only.

  • @ishantmrinal
    @ishantmrinal 7 місяців тому +1

    They are wasting time on a very single matter. Not to the point. Same point round and round

    • @user-ct1uq4pe6r
      @user-ct1uq4pe6r 7 місяців тому +1

      It is a Court of competent jurisdiction; it cannot adopt the style of lay men. It has to follow the procedure established by law.

  • @punitmishra652
    @punitmishra652 26 днів тому

    If both the parties are doing job. Then welfare of child can't be considered over his opinion. The child is staying with whom he/she is going to favour the same.
    Even after being doctor, she was not able to understand her husband well being, mental health and psychological health . Then she went to that extent to file a complaint in her husband office and again filed a FIR against him.
    Judge should understand, that she is not fit to take care of child. As she has mood swings, which reflects in her actions, even that consequences cause major damage to her husband career, future and growth, she is ready to mentally haras him and make him surrender.
    If Court is going for Child opinion where he/she wants to stay, then i believe 11-12years Children can be offer rights to Vote, marriage, Job opportunity, etc as they are smart enough to decide what is good for them

  • @riteshtripathi9922
    @riteshtripathi9922 2 місяці тому

    498 is brahmos for women

  • @PushpaKumari-vl2it
    @PushpaKumari-vl2it 3 місяці тому

    जब लोग महिला की बात करें तो यह स्पष्ट सोच कर करें कि वह अच्छी महिला की बात कर रहे हैं या आतंकी महिला की।

  • @nileshb-ij1rg
    @nileshb-ij1rg 4 місяці тому

    court to husband ki baat hi nahi sun rahe

  • @desiboosterdose
    @desiboosterdose 8 місяців тому

    Banana Republic and Rotten Judiciary

  • @Dumawix
    @Dumawix 4 місяці тому

    Bhai 36 gun mila ky q karty ho shadi 😂

  • @shayarsaini
    @shayarsaini 9 місяців тому

    In every case, this judge disappoint me,

  • @rishi8840
    @rishi8840 7 місяців тому

    These sessions should take place in oyo rooms.. do they even understand how women are hardwired?

  • @ayu24222
    @ayu24222 5 місяців тому

    this man got remarriedddd ..leaving child and wife..why people are still favouring him here??

    • @srmlhss
      @srmlhss Місяць тому

      He git remarried after the divorce decree ans after the 90 days limitation period. He didn't do anything illegal

    • @ayu24222
      @ayu24222 Місяць тому

      Then whts wrong if she asks for maintenance for child and herself? A woman sacrifices her time , energy, another skills ..everything in her marriage and how suddenly she would afford all after getting ditched by her husband?? nobody plans for divorce while getting married.. our society sucks these days

  • @NinjakuWarrior360
    @NinjakuWarrior360 5 місяців тому

    Which argument was great? None.

  • @trinityhiemer7280
    @trinityhiemer7280 9 місяців тому +1

    Bhai hindu marriage act hi lutawa act bn gaya hai

  • @kirtinagayach418
    @kirtinagayach418 Рік тому +7

    Husband is using child custody as tool to enforce divorce . Same as a child is kidnapped to get something ? Shameless husband and cruel father be punished also .

  • @anmolkumarnagpal532
    @anmolkumarnagpal532 4 місяці тому +1

    First the court takes 7 years to listen the arguments and the child who was years old , now after living with mother alone what and which fool thinks that child will like to stay with father? I think basics are not clear to all of them.. Secondly why one should stay with a person who is a wrong person? When one person reaches court it means everything is over.. After going there only one thing will happen and that is wastage of time.. Mr. Judge is telling again again lets call the child... Child will only like to stay with the person with whom the child has stayed more.... I don't know why they simply makes people fool to each other....