Gru suck in constructed ok in arena so could disinchunt him when you have enough dust and get one of the bed legndary in the game (ragnoros,tirion or Dr boom)
lkjkhfggd Loatheb tends to be bad in arena because arena decks don't rely on spells that much so it is less good.Also Gruul is a good late game card because arena is slower so it has more time to grow.
TheClassicalSauce He said that specifically in regards to arena, not constructed, because Hunter's one catch-up mechanic in arena was Buzzard+Unleash - and guess what, he was right. Hunters took a massive drop in arena after those nerfs and are still one of the lowest tier classes for it. So thank you for proving Trumps point. He was correct in that statement, so he should be in the one you replied to.
I had a Legendary Rogue Arena run months ago, like 3 weeks before the Buzzard nerf, had Hogger & Vancleef, ended up 8-2 before eventually going 11-3 losing to a hunter that had an insane draw because of the 2 mana Buzzard.
I think Trump is usually overcompensating with his praise of fel reaver, but this video is the first time I heard him give actual reasonable advice regarding it at 21:00 . It's not as bad as it would appear at first glance but it's also not as harmless as he always insists. Pretty much any card can lose you the game if drawn or played at a terrible moment (Flame Leviathon when you have 2 health minions, late game zombie chow against a low health opponent, flame imp on low life, drawing Ragnaros on turn 1 against aggro, etc.), but fel reaver is tied with Millhouse Manastorm for how spectacularly it can make you shoot yourself in the foot when things go wrong.
Ahh Gruul, my first legendary. I actually had a lot of success throwing him into some random decks. He eats a rag hit and trades into him. This was before GvG, I haven't really played since it launched. I reckon BGH would own him these days, sigh.
By my calculations there's actually a 53%+ chance that the 6 bombs would hit one target at least 2x. This makes sense since there are 6 bombs split amongst 4 so 2 on average would have to get hit by an extra bomb, which is close to 50%.So consider it around 50%.
@Klaus Kleber It for sure is not 4 for 1. As you know, it discards cards from you deck and not your hand. It's ok card in constructed, extremely good in arena.
Eh, it's a very controversial card. In arena, it can be pretty good, depending on the situation (see the discussion 3 or 4 comments above this one for reasons why).
Fel Reaver is good if you play it on turn 5-6. Past turn 8 and until natural fatigue, it's a huge coinflip. You either win with it, or you lose because of it, horribly, cardless.
I finished a 9 win arena run, then started a new one while watching. Got Mal'ganis and Mogor the ogre. Unfortunately the arena decided to give me a bunch of late game cards so it's looking like a 3-4 win deck due to little early game.
Got a sneeds and boom in a Rogue draft. Got KT from sneeds three times. 11-3. All three loses to Mages. First time I got 10+ with two legs. Usually I go below avg.
"This might be a turn 5 fel reaver game!" "Fel Reaver is going to win me the game, just you see!" Plays Fel reaver, discards 6 cards. Fel Reaver does nothing. Can't wait to see more AMAZING Fel Reaver plays! Lol. Then we get to hear some crazy rationale about how Fel Reaver is "bringing him cards". Lol, so dumb.
Fel Reaver is nothing like Venture Co Mercenary, especially in arena. If the opponent kills it with one card played, it's a 4 for 1. Trump can't deny it's downsides and he as an experienced arena player should know them quite well, since there is no value to get out of this card.
Except that it's really not a 4 for 1. Cards discarded from the deck are not counted because you haven't drawn them yet. You can think of the effect as "send the top 3 cards from your deck to the bottom of the deck", which effectively does nothing- assuming the game doesn't go to fatigue. In other words, as long as the game does not go to fatigue, fel reaver is a vanilla 5 mana 8/8. This is why Trump believes this is a good card. The downside of the card is that it is horrible in decks that rely on a key card, but most arena decks aren't.
Daniel Sim I know but there is just so little room to get anything out of this card. Venture Co Mercenary is practically a good card at all circumstances, best when behind, but Fel Reaver is a card you can't play if you're far behind and you don't need to play if you're ahead. If you're deck is somewhat useful you will discard good cards that you might need later, if you have not lost by that point or if you have not won by that point because you were ahead anyway. I can't see Fel Reaver being of any use if not in that very specific position where both players burned their fuel and the enemy is outlasting you, in which case it might eat 2-3 cards from the opponent while draining 6-9 from you. If you put this card in your deck, you cannot argue with value, that's why I can't justify it in arena. Beside the fact that I've not seen one Fel Reaver being used to an advantage since it was released.
Klaus Kleber Fel reaver is essentially a card that can be a win condition by itself. If played on turn 4 or 5, it literally wins you the game if unanswered. However at the same time, it gives your opponent a win condition at the same time. If they can answer it, and at the same time play a number of cards on that turn or on subsequent turns, it may just have lot you the game. I think the main reason people don't like it is that it is always a gamble to pick and play this card. On paper though, this card should win you more arena games than lose you. I personally wouldn't play it though because I can never feel happy about having it out. It's really not that bad of a card though.
"If I carry the knife on my back long enough..... "(it will turn into a fireball) At 23:25 , Does anyone know if this is a line from something? Or am I just reading too much into it...
You should make an arena run where you only take the worst of the three cards presented to you (the card you see least value in) just to see how balanced all cards really are.
He stated many times that he considers it a good card...even though it cost him many games .Guessing he doesn't want to admit he was wrong out of pride
If you can avoid going to fatigue it's good because you can make the argument that you always have the chance of drawing or not drawing cards in a rng game. It's frustrating to see good cards vaporized but I can understand it having value if played turn 5 in a rush deck
i hate getting fel reaver in arena... and yes i know all the arguments for fel reaver "if you don't go into fatigue.." blah blah... maybe there is a place for it in constructed (though that is yet to be seen), but in arena i am always so sad when i pick it.. i've lost too many games because of it. Last night i drafted the most insane warlock deck ever... and only went 5 wins cause i lost two games on the back of fel reaver burning my lategame and sending me to fatigue..... my deck frigging had ragnaros, two floating watchers (synergized with my 2 hellfire and dread infernal as well), a molten giant and some other sick cards
I would rather play a card that loses the arena immediately, uninstalled hearthstone, deleted my Battle.net account, contacted a hit man to kill me, and then be shot in the head within five minutes of playing the card by the hit man, than play Fel Reaver.
Are arena drops completely random? I always see Trump getting at least 2 epic picks and a legendary or two, but in my entire arena career I have had a single legendary, and epics are few and far between...
in arena there isnt as much hard removal like bgh or class specific removal. Loatheb is also good but if the enemy doesnt have a spell they want to cast its just a 5 mana 5/5.
Gruul is an 8 mana 8/8 that could be silenced to a 7/7 but if the other player doesnt have an aswer to Gruul which is more likely in arena then you pretty much win the game. Its an insane late game micro machine
But epics are generally a poor choice in Arena. The only time I would want to see epics are with a druid for Ancient of Lore/War. Generally most of the epics for every class are poor choices like Mountain Giant that you won't play when you topdeck him, clockwork giant when the opponent has no hand, molten giant usually comes down too late where the opponent already has board control. BGH usually doesn't get a target and is played as a 4/2, faceless manipulator usually doesn't get value since there's not too many all big scary things in arena. Only decent one I can think of is Shade or a 3/3 like Murloc Warleader/Southsea Captain.
Not once have I ever gone above 3 wins in arena with a legendary except for once, and that time wasn't thanks to it. I'm not claiming to be good or anything, but I can consistently get above that with all but the trashiest of drafts. If you think legendaries are going to carry arena runs for you, you're going to be severely disappointed - good luck is always met with bad luck.
I know Fel Reaver is a good card, but I would never ever pick it over ANY other card. I just don't enjoy the thought of having my cards gone, it is way too stressful.
I was playing ranked, priest with alarm-o-bot, got a perfect hand and got wargolem, force tank max and stormwind champ... The War Golem had divine spirit, the tank had divine/inner-fire and a stormwind champ. I was like wtf is this..................
Anyone else feel like that over the months, trump has started to really undervalue the defender of argus in arena...i thought it was a really good card
ERF says "Hey guys, want totem?" and "Of course..." if you ask them if they're free. So you better take one, just to be safe. You never know when those guys will get angry and strike you with their ultimate, earthquake. Not only can they see the future, but they can use far sight to peek when someone's taking a bath... D:
I live in the American Gardens state building, on West 81st street. My name is Patrick Bateman, I'm twenty-seven years old. I believe in taking care of myself, in a balanced diet and a rigorous excercise routine. In the morning, if my face is a little puffy, I'll put on an ice pack while doing my stomach crunches. I can do a thousand now.
Try this spicy deck its shaman Forked lightning 2 rock bitter 2ansesturial spirit 2 Reincarnate 2flame tongue 2 iron beak 2 eggs 2 hex Lava burst Lightning storm Mana tide 2 shades of n Dark iron Defend of argus Pilot shredder Fugean Stalag Lothab 2 fire elemental Meaxxena ( changeble) Storm wind
I know it's not great it's just fun to play cause u can get tons of Thadiuses and there not that many overload there's 3 I've been trying to make it better
He picked fel reaver in a deck skewed towards late game. It's gonna screw him and everyone will say, "look at how useless fel revear is! It's complete trash!"
Here we go again, the big fel reaver debate. I'm looking forward to all the "fel reaver is terrible!"-comments. Just to give you a heads up: You're wrong ;P
why are we wrong because a person on youtube/twitch said so just because somebody says murder is a good thing its good? i just find it hilarious that you believe in someone because of what they say. you would have made a great Nazi in world war 2!
tdog1435 what gives you the impression that I think the card is great in Arena, because Trump believes that? I know Fel Reaver is good, because I understand chance.
Just a heads up, you're a terrible troll. There's a reason no one is running fel reaver. Not even trump who so stubbornly tried to defend it. Sorry that you can't accept the facts. :3c
A1phaz0ne Well I guess then Trump is a terrible troll as well, if liking reaver in arena means trolling. :P no1 is running fel reaver in constructed, because it's terrible in constructed, way too slow. just like venture co mercenary or boulderfist oger are terrible in constructed. but if you had paid attention to my last comment, I said that it is a great card in ARENA. and all the great arena players are running it. Sorry that you can't accept the facts. :3
Can some1 please,please explain the 2nd pick .. like for fucking real ... frostbolt...card that can only 1 for 1 at best...picked over ogre AND force tank? WHAT THE HELL
Frostbolt is removal, lets you have board control some of the time. Better board control = better chance of winning. Though it is a hard choice between those two
Fell reaver is terrible wtf How u going to win the game once it's played. It's exactly like putting all your eggs in one basket except youre deliberately throwing out every egg already in the basket for an ostrich egg
I never skip the draft. It is my favorite part of the video. I would watch just videos of drafting Arena.
Me too!
me too
i normally close the video after the draft :D
i usually if i'm tired just check the draft and what he gets :D
i still feel like the 4-6 over sheep was a mistake / didint see video yet
Trump: Aha!
Antonidas: Aha!
Trump: Aha!
Antonidas: Aha!
Valeera: AHHGH!
Somewhere, a Southsea Deckhand feels left out.
i watch draft and first game
15:14 Me? Me smash!
I think this is literally the first time I have seen Gruul played.
Grull is one of my only (and favourite) legendary
Gru suck in constructed ok in arena so could disinchunt him when you have enough dust and get one of the bed legndary in the game (ragnoros,tirion or Dr boom)
I've never played Gruul myself, but I've had it played against me before in arena. I still have no idea why he took Gruul over Loatheb...
lkjkhfggd Loatheb tends to be bad in arena because arena decks don't rely on spells that much so it is less good.Also Gruul is a good late game card because arena is slower so it has more time to grow.
Gruul is rare because almost all Hearthstone players are unworthy of playing him.
"Fel Reaver is good." - Trump, 2015. We shall see.
TheClassicalSauce He said that specifically in regards to arena, not constructed, because Hunter's one catch-up mechanic in arena was Buzzard+Unleash - and guess what, he was right. Hunters took a massive drop in arena after those nerfs and are still one of the lowest tier classes for it.
So thank you for proving Trumps point. He was correct in that statement, so he should be in the one you replied to.
DunkScrubs No he said for constructed, and afterwards he admited he was wrong saying hunter was dead
I like watching Trump's streams at night. Yesterday I sorta fell asleep but I still heard him talk which is really relaxing.
Blizzard, do you hear that? Archmage Puddlestomper. Make it happen.
Ha hah
Ha hah
Fel reaver is gonna be his doom in the end....
'Sees Trump draft a Fel Reaver'
It's gonna be one of those runs isnt it?
Hunter in constructed and Mage in arena? Is Trump working on a new villain persona?
I had a Legendary Rogue Arena run months ago, like 3 weeks before the Buzzard nerf, had Hogger & Vancleef, ended up 8-2 before eventually going 11-3 losing to a hunter that had an insane draw because of the 2 mana Buzzard.
I think Trump is usually overcompensating with his praise of fel reaver, but this video is the first time I heard him give actual reasonable advice regarding it at 21:00 . It's not as bad as it would appear at first glance but it's also not as harmless as he always insists.
Pretty much any card can lose you the game if drawn or played at a terrible moment (Flame Leviathon when you have 2 health minions, late game zombie chow against a low health opponent, flame imp on low life, drawing Ragnaros on turn 1 against aggro, etc.), but fel reaver is tied with Millhouse Manastorm for how spectacularly it can make you shoot yourself in the foot when things go wrong.
Archmage Antopuddlestomper - new card comfirmed!
Everytime you play a spell, you get a grrgmgl-sound! Sounds op!
Ahh Gruul, my first legendary. I actually had a lot of success throwing him into some random decks. He eats a rag hit and trades into him. This was before GvG, I haven't really played since it launched. I reckon BGH would own him these days, sigh.
By my calculations there's actually a 53%+ chance that the 6 bombs would hit one target at least 2x. This makes sense since there are 6 bombs split amongst 4 so 2 on average would have to get hit by an extra bomb, which is close to 50%.So consider it around 50%.
Recently i've finally watched the No Game No Life opening, and i was like "Oh my gosh, that guy is wearing Trump's shirt!"
On his fan page no game no life is his favorite anime as it is mine :D
Trump:What you're insane if you don't think a 5 mana 8/8 isn't value!
Everyone:You suck.
Expect "everyone" consists of non-legendary players :3
Crazy first game lol, a lot of legendaries and epics
@Klaus Kleber It for sure is not 4 for 1. As you know, it discards cards from you deck and not your hand. It's ok card in constructed, extremely good in arena.
"Fel Reaver is acually good"
Said no one EVER!
Eh, it's a very controversial card. In arena, it can be pretty good, depending on the situation (see the discussion 3 or 4 comments above this one for reasons why).
Only Trump and the people that treat his opinion as the law.
If your enemy dosnt put taunts it wins games alone or loses otherwise
Fel Reaver is good if you play it on turn 5-6. Past turn 8 and until natural fatigue, it's a huge coinflip. You either win with it, or you lose because of it, horribly, cardless.
Fel Reaver can be great, but sometimes Trump values it a bit too highly.
I finished a 9 win arena run, then started a new one while watching. Got Mal'ganis and Mogor the ogre. Unfortunately the arena decided to give me a bunch of late game cards so it's looking like a 3-4 win deck due to little early game.
Archmage Puddlestomper! Most renowned leader of kirin tor
Got a sneeds and boom in a Rogue draft. Got KT from sneeds three times. 11-3. All three loses to Mages. First time I got 10+ with two legs. Usually I go below avg.
"This might be a turn 5 fel reaver game!"
"Fel Reaver is going to win me the game, just you see!"
Plays Fel reaver, discards 6 cards. Fel Reaver does nothing.
Can't wait to see more AMAZING Fel Reaver plays! Lol. Then we get to hear some crazy rationale about how Fel Reaver is "bringing him cards". Lol, so dumb.
Are you kidding? Fel Reaver took down two cards more expensive than him; that's called card advantage my friend.
imagine what would have happened if he didn't draw fel-reaver?
I'd love to see Archmage Antapuddle Stomper!
8:39 Archmage Puddlestomper huh. Well here is a card idea for the next expansion.
What a funny thing! Today I started arena and first card I picked was Antonidas :D
Oh joy a new arena!
oh my gosh, the Arena is so giving :D
Trump has been all about Fel for a bit now I would love it if he's right but I haven't seen it truly pay off for anyone in the long run
Fel Reaver is nothing like Venture Co Mercenary, especially in arena. If the opponent kills it with one card played, it's a 4 for 1. Trump can't deny it's downsides and he as an experienced arena player should know them quite well, since there is no value to get out of this card.
Except that it's really not a 4 for 1. Cards discarded from the deck are not counted because you haven't drawn them yet. You can think of the effect as "send the top 3 cards from your deck to the bottom of the deck", which effectively does nothing- assuming the game doesn't go to fatigue. In other words, as long as the game does not go to fatigue, fel reaver is a vanilla 5 mana 8/8. This is why Trump believes this is a good card. The downside of the card is that it is horrible in decks that rely on a key card, but most arena decks aren't.
Daniel Sim Lightsworn YuGiOh players rejoice!
Daniel Sim I know but there is just so little room to get anything out of this card. Venture Co Mercenary is practically a good card at all circumstances, best when behind, but Fel Reaver is a card you can't play if you're far behind and you don't need to play if you're ahead. If you're deck is somewhat useful you will discard good cards that you might need later, if you have not lost by that point or if you have not won by that point because you were ahead anyway. I can't see Fel Reaver being of any use if not in that very specific position where both players burned their fuel and the enemy is outlasting you, in which case it might eat 2-3 cards from the opponent while draining 6-9 from you. If you put this card in your deck, you cannot argue with value, that's why I can't justify it in arena. Beside the fact that I've not seen one Fel Reaver being used to an advantage since it was released.
Klaus Kleber Fel reaver is essentially a card that can be a win condition by itself. If played on turn 4 or 5, it literally wins you the game if unanswered. However at the same time, it gives your opponent a win condition at the same time. If they can answer it, and at the same time play a number of cards on that turn or on subsequent turns, it may just have lot you the game. I think the main reason people don't like it is that it is always a gamble to pick and play this card. On paper though, this card should win you more arena games than lose you.
I personally wouldn't play it though because I can never feel happy about having it out. It's really not that bad of a card though.
Sorry I'm new in HS but how to create the left panel that showing your deck ? thank you.
"If I carry the knife on my back long enough..... "(it will turn into a fireball)
At 23:25 , Does anyone know if this is a line from something? Or am I just reading too much into it...
You should make an arena run where you only take the worst of the three cards presented to you (the card you see least value in) just to see how balanced all cards really are.
Fell Reaver 5 mana 8/8. Effect: discard all your crappy cards. Most OP card in Arena
Wait I thought Reaver was absolute trash, is trump trolling or am I being a fool??
Reaver is very value-oriented, but it depends on the deck whether he is good.
He stated many times that he considers it a good card...even though it cost him many games .Guessing he doesn't want to admit he was wrong out of pride
reaver mostly a gamble in arena it can win you a game in 3 turns or it can lose one after 3 turns
nope this card aint good
If you can avoid going to fatigue it's good because you can make the argument that you always have the chance of drawing or not drawing cards in a rng game. It's frustrating to see good cards vaporized but I can understand it having value if played turn 5 in a rush deck
Gruul is so awesome. Even if he doesn't get play in constructed.
Is Trump wearing the I love humanity shirt from No game No life, or is it just me?
i hate getting fel reaver in arena... and yes i know all the arguments for fel reaver "if you don't go into fatigue.." blah blah... maybe there is a place for it in constructed (though that is yet to be seen), but in arena i am always so sad when i pick it.. i've lost too many games because of it. Last night i drafted the most insane warlock deck ever... and only went 5 wins cause i lost two games on the back of fel reaver burning my lategame and sending me to fatigue..... my deck frigging had ragnaros, two floating watchers (synergized with my 2 hellfire and dread infernal as well), a molten giant and some other sick cards
21:50 best joke ever
"Mmh, I like ogre so much"
Picks frostbolt
12 wins. I was thinking around 10 wins and then he got antonidas. 12 win deck right here.
Why every arena run starts with a phrase "Wow! It's been a really long time since I played this class"?
I would rather play a card that loses the arena immediately, uninstalled hearthstone, deleted my Battle.net account, contacted a hit man to kill me, and then be shot in the head within five minutes of playing the card by the hit man, than play Fel Reaver.
Are arena drops completely random? I always see Trump getting at least 2 epic picks and a legendary or two, but in my entire arena career I have had a single legendary, and epics are few and far between...
can someone explain why gruul was the better choice? i feel loatheb is a better pick. but that's just my opinion
In arena it's mostly just a 5/5 for 5 mana. as there are not that many spells.
in arena there isnt as much hard removal like bgh or class specific removal. Loatheb is also good but if the enemy doesnt have a spell they want to cast its just a 5 mana 5/5.
Gruul is an 8 mana 8/8 that could be silenced to a 7/7 but if the other player doesnt have an aswer to Gruul which is more likely in arena then you pretty much win the game. Its an insane late game micro machine
From now on I'm going to call Gruul "Macro Machine".
ah alrighty. im not so familiar with the whole arena scene (especially now since my laptop broke) thanks for clearing it out ^>^
Is Trump wearing a I
Is trump wearing a I love humanity shirt?
Two legends in arena? Wow.
Wow even full screen 1080p I can barely read that subscriber popup
if he didn't choose fel reaver, it would be the best deck i've ever seen.
Trump drafts a sick deck... I think to myself "Omg I wanna draft aswell!".... draft 30 target dummies...
It makes me cringe to see these videos where people pick up TWO legendaries in one arena. I'm glad if I even see a single epic pick when I draft.
Yeah I know the feeling. lol *sigh*
But epics are generally a poor choice in Arena. The only time I would want to see epics are with a druid for Ancient of Lore/War. Generally most of the epics for every class are poor choices like Mountain Giant that you won't play when you topdeck him, clockwork giant when the opponent has no hand, molten giant usually comes down too late where the opponent already has board control. BGH usually doesn't get a target and is played as a 4/2, faceless manipulator usually doesn't get value since there's not too many all big scary things in arena. Only decent one I can think of is Shade or a 3/3 like Murloc Warleader/Southsea Captain.
Not once have I ever gone above 3 wins in arena with a legendary except for once, and that time wasn't thanks to it. I'm not claiming to be good or anything, but I can consistently get above that with all but the trashiest of drafts. If you think legendaries are going to carry arena runs for you, you're going to be severely disappointed - good luck is always met with bad luck.
Play more games u child..
Koen Wijneb Says the rank 25. But I agree with you lol0999, epics are not that great in arena.
I know Fel Reaver is a good card, but I would never ever pick it over ANY other card.
I just don't enjoy the thought of having my cards gone, it is way too stressful.
If ppl can't deal with fell reaver right away it is so good. It is also so bad. Tough pick
I think mageis a good begin in arena for beginners but when you are more expert
i would chose hunter because it has so many options
Hunter sucks in arena ive only seen hunter 1 once in arena at least for me
Is that an I
I was playing ranked, priest with alarm-o-bot, got a perfect hand and got wargolem, force tank max and stormwind champ... The War Golem had divine spirit, the tank had divine/inner-fire and a stormwind champ. I was like wtf is this..................
You play war golam= your a rank 25 scrub
Anyone else feel like that over the months, trump has started to really undervalue the defender of argus in arena...i thought it was a really good card
Does anyone know what the Earthen Ring Farseer is saying when it got played?
"My eyes....are open"
ERF says "Hey guys, want totem?" and "Of course..." if you ask them if they're free. So you better take one, just to be safe. You never know when those guys will get angry and strike you with their ultimate, earthquake. Not only can they see the future, but they can use far sight to peek when someone's taking a bath... D:
I live in the American Gardens state building, on West 81st street. My name is Patrick Bateman, I'm twenty-seven years old. I believe in taking care of myself, in a balanced diet and a rigorous excercise routine. In the morning, if my face is a little puffy, I'll put on an ice pack while doing my stomach crunches. I can do a thousand now.
LordDragox412 He Doesnt say that he says "my eyes are open"
tdog1435
Maybe you should open your eyes too, it doesn't take a farseer to spot a simple joke like that... >:P
How come in 12 arenas I ve never got a legendary choice?!Blizzard needs to make this more fair.
why no sheep 4 mana 2 aoe dmg?
gj trump! greetings from ARG..
Played like 20 Arenas in two days..Got only 2 Legendaries out of 20 drafts...
I got a 12-0 run with fel reaver, he is such a strong card in arena
None of us missed mage arenas
Gruul + Master of Disguise = Combo Wombo?
I just got doctor boom and rag in the same arena.... went 3 wins and then got knocked out after not drawing either of them at all...
If was lucky but 100% u didn't pick any Card Draw... that's why
Mega444 Was Warlock man you don't need alot of card draw for that. And I had so many blocks too. RIP tazdingo
Uni Porpoise U didn't said that...
Try this spicy deck its shaman
Forked lightning
2 rock bitter
2ansesturial spirit
2 Reincarnate
2flame tongue
2 iron beak
2 eggs
2 hex
Lava burst
Lightning storm
Mana tide
2 shades of n
Dark iron
Defend of argus
Pilot shredder
Fugean
Stalag
Lothab
2 fire elemental
Meaxxena ( changeble)
Storm wind
its not that good of a deck too many overload and shaman is bad class right now
I know it's not great it's just fun to play cause u can get tons of Thadiuses and there not that many overload there's 3 I've been trying to make it better
I am predicting this is going to go 12 wins
My guess is 11 wins for this one :) (haven't seen any games yet)
My guess is 9 Fel Reafer Sucks
*Reaver
sara Otto you know... you could edit your comment..
'Fel reaver is actually good' - Kappa
I think arena should have 1 guaranteed legendary every draft, just the 1 - it might ruin arena it might help it - either way it'd be funny
Maybe another mode where you can pick a legendary as your main card and make a deck around it like arena but geranted a legendary
DOUBLE BEAST
#PraiseTheFelReaver
He picked fel reaver in a deck skewed towards late game. It's gonna screw him and everyone will say, "look at how useless fel revear is! It's complete trash!"
Why fel reaver that has lost many games. I would have picked wee spell stopper instead.
Trump wearing No Game No Life -I Love Humanity shirt?
Why gruul over loatheb?
loatheb's battlecry is less useful in arena
definitely overvalues fel reaver.
Did he just say hell no. Oooo!!! :P
i wana see a archemage antipuddles card
I love Imanity
I "Heart" Humanity shirt. No Game No Life!!!
Here we go again, the big fel reaver debate. I'm looking forward to all the "fel reaver is terrible!"-comments. Just to give you a heads up: You're wrong ;P
why are we wrong because a person on youtube/twitch said so
just because somebody says murder is a good thing its good?
i just find it hilarious that you believe in someone because of what they say.
you would have made a great Nazi in world war 2!
tdog1435 what gives you the impression that I think the card is great in Arena, because Trump believes that? I know Fel Reaver is good, because I understand chance.
Just a heads up, you're a terrible troll. There's a reason no one is running fel reaver. Not even trump who so stubbornly tried to defend it. Sorry that you can't accept the facts. :3c
A1phaz0ne Well I guess then Trump is a terrible troll as well, if liking reaver in arena means trolling. :P no1 is running fel reaver in constructed, because it's terrible in constructed, way too slow. just like venture co mercenary or boulderfist oger are terrible in constructed. but if you had paid attention to my last comment, I said that it is a great card in ARENA. and all the great arena players are running it. Sorry that you can't accept the facts. :3
ARCHMAGE puddlestomper xD
I honestly hope he doesn't draw the fel reaver in any of these games ..I die a little bit inside when i see all those cards go '*puff*
atleast someone gets a good arena draft. i only get 4 mana cards
my guess is for this arena is 10 wins :)
Archmage Puddlestomper.
Can some1 please,please explain the 2nd pick .. like for fucking real ...
frostbolt...card that can only 1 for 1 at best...picked over ogre AND force tank? WHAT THE HELL
lol man xD are you sure of your commentary xD ?
Frostbolt is removal, lets you have board control some of the time. Better board control = better chance of winning. Though it is a hard choice between those two
Picking Gruul over Loatheb hahaha
12 wins with felreaver, brave lol
If that card doesn't win you the game you just lost it lol.
Unless it was a dead card like most of these games :o
you might wanna keep that thought in mind. fel reaver was played quite often in this run and not a single time did it lose him the game
soooo many legendaries :) wtf blizz?
I wouldnt consider 2 as a so with 4 o's
I've played that pally happyfeet on ladder. He was around r9 a few days ago and was a bming asshole. Unless that was a different guy.
AHA BMMMM !
Bolt over ogre?!? Wtf?!?
Why not hunter? Kappa
Hunter is arena suck all the time
shuvo rahman
Hence the Kappa
Fell reaver is terrible wtf
How u going to win the game once it's played. It's exactly like putting all your eggs in one basket except youre deliberately throwing out every egg already in the basket for an ostrich egg
damn.