Pro Tour Journey into Nyx - Quarterfinal - Patrick Chapin vs. Jamie Parke

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 65

  • @BaconFrisbee
    @BaconFrisbee 3 роки тому +2

    Glad Patrick won. That BUG deck is mind-numbing to watch

  • @hamsterdancer4244
    @hamsterdancer4244 10 років тому +4

    Chapin looks like my friends dad and Parke looks like my socials teacher

  • @samjabloner2439
    @samjabloner2439 10 років тому +2

    Not necessarily such a bad play. He was setting up two reaper scry triggers, and got a valuable creature off of Chapin's board. It was in no way an unreasonable expectation that he hit 1 land in the top 3 cards of his deck.

    • @thegreatmajora13
      @thegreatmajora13 10 років тому

      it think i would have been looking for a three mana removal spell for the brimaz. If he finds one, then kiora goes ultimate, and it becomes VERY hard for Chapin to win. A hero's downfall in the top three cards effectively wins the game.

    • @samjabloner2439
      @samjabloner2439 10 років тому

      thegreatmajora13 Definitely. At any rate it isn't like he punted by blocking with the Caryatid, he had plenty to do with one mana more or just a removal spell. Definitely interesting how Chapin's Thoughtseize on Caryatid was so effective (I think that was this game?).

    • @jakob187
      @jakob187 10 років тому +1

      It was an incredibly bad play. Chapin is playing off top-decks in that round. Absolutely no reason to sack a necessary mana when you aren't drawing well, especially when you have a Kiora on the board that Chapin will HAVE to swing at. Kiora is a dime a dozen. Hitting a land was VASTLY more important. Caryatid should block Courser, Reaper on Fleecemane, and let the Courser wipe out Kiora.
      When it really comes down to it, though, Parke just got outpaced because he had no mana on board. Bad draws are bad. = /

    • @Gossemir13
      @Gossemir13 10 років тому

      wtf did I just watch

  • @NitroTheRhino
    @NitroTheRhino 10 років тому +1

    Glad to see Chapin playing something fun and not just perpetuating monoblack like everyone else.

    • @svenniepennie4237
      @svenniepennie4237 10 років тому +2

      This is block constructed. Mono black devotion doesnt work all that well without: Pack Rat, Lifebane Zombie, Nightveil Spectre, Underworld Connections, Desecration Demon and Mutavault.

  • @harryg8901
    @harryg8901 10 років тому

    "Did you feel good about yourself when you said cat fight?" that made me laugh.

  • @Mrkingrandoh
    @Mrkingrandoh 10 років тому +1

    Does anyone know where i can find patrick chapin's deck list?

    • @AnubisApprentice
      @AnubisApprentice 10 років тому +2

      Mtg's Home page it should be under the daily archive.

    • @zorac91
      @zorac91 10 років тому +1

      mtgtop8 . com

    • @Mrkingrandoh
      @Mrkingrandoh 10 років тому

      Thanks for resoonding. Sorry for looking at it so late

    • @AnubisApprentice
      @AnubisApprentice 10 років тому

      It happens. Don't worry about it. Do you watch these for fun, or study to go pro, both? Just curious.

    • @AnubisApprentice
      @AnubisApprentice 10 років тому +2

      Who? I hope you're not refering to me. Only time I net deck is to play test against with my own creation. If you plan grinding to go pro level better know the deck you're playing against and have memory muscle against that deck and/or any variants against it. That is how I see it. If you are neting it just to rebuild and play to claim the prize, in my opinion I see no point in doing it.

  • @TheLuminousCleric
    @TheLuminousCleric 2 роки тому

    @18:45-ish....how come Chapin /and nobody else for that matter/ declare beginning of combat? It is a high level tournament. You would assume they follow through with all the steps.

  • @jotunmarty
    @jotunmarty 10 років тому

    some one help me out at 6:00 minutes he scrys after he plays the courser of kruphix what is that scry trigger from though ? ?

    • @IceMaverick13
      @IceMaverick13 10 років тому

      Sorry for being so late in this response, but here's a breakdown of Jamie's turn at about 5:49 if that's what you were referring too.
      He played Courser of Kruphix which makes you play with the top card of your deck face-up. The Courser also reads that if the top card is a land, you may play it. The first card he flipped over (and subsequently played because of the Courser) was a Temple of Deceit, a blue-black land that lets you scry 1 when it's played.

  • @kavisterling7604
    @kavisterling7604 8 років тому +1

    Love this gameeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

  • @GToul13
    @GToul13 10 років тому

    awesome match!

  • @TheTexasDice
    @TheTexasDice 10 років тому +2

    55:00 That was the stupidest block I've ever seen. What the fuck happend?
    Caryatid would have blocked the Courser without a problem and the Lion too.
    A really bad play by Parke here.

  • @ryansanderson8229
    @ryansanderson8229 10 років тому +7

    Does Patrick Chaplin have OCD

    • @Travis7060312
      @Travis7060312 10 років тому

      it looks like it.. I have OCD and arrange and rearrange my cards the same way he does

    • @Prinrin
      @Prinrin 10 років тому +3

      I don't believe he does.
      If you're referring to the constant shaking, he has a nerve condition.

    • @ryansanderson8229
      @ryansanderson8229 10 років тому

      I was more refuring to the arangement of lands and such

    • @svenniepennie4237
      @svenniepennie4237 10 років тому +1

      No, thats just making sure that all cards and their state are easily visible.

    • @svenniepennie4237
      @svenniepennie4237 10 років тому +3

      azzans
      I play *exactly* like that and I dont have OCD. There is a huge difference between wanting things to be ordered properly and having OCD. There's always a ton of people claiming they have OCD or that "[their] OCD is acting up" on the internet. The vast majority (if not all) of those people dont have OCD. They just have an appreciation for order and symmetry.

  • @GoblinTinkerer
    @GoblinTinkerer 10 років тому

    Did they just namedrop LRR's Graham Stark? LRR has come a long way.

    • @mrphlip
      @mrphlip 10 років тому

      Not just Graham getting namedropped by the commentators, but also a tap-tap-concede in game 1...

  • @Thebeardieguy123
    @Thebeardieguy123 10 років тому +2

    I have Jamie's sphinx

  • @ekriakon
    @ekriakon 9 років тому +3

    bobby fisher!!!

  • @greengrapejelly
    @greengrapejelly 10 років тому +2

    Abzan Midrange vs. Sultai Control

    • @griffithdota
      @griffithdota 9 років тому +1

      +Justin Rose for some reason i like bug and junk more

    • @greengrapejelly
      @greengrapejelly 9 років тому

      Who doesn't xD

    • @griffithdota
      @griffithdota 9 років тому

      some newcomers that have no idea of eternal formats

  • @svenniepennie4237
    @svenniepennie4237 10 років тому

    1:54
    How is Bile Blight one of the few cards that can kill Fleecemane? Sure, you can kill it before it goes monstrous (although, so can Hero's Downfall and Silence the Believers), as soon as it goes monstrous it's just as pointless as the rest of them though. Even if he were to have two out, one of them not being monstrous yet and you'd target that one, you still wouldnt kill the monstrous one, it being 4/4 and all.

    • @ryan151515x
      @ryan151515x 9 років тому +1

      svennie pennie Bile Blight give -3/-3. When Fleecemane becomes monstrous, it gains indestructible. the only way to "kill" an indestructible creature is by -1/-1 counters. Because indestructible says that this creature cannot be destroyed by damage or effects saying "destroy", while -1/-1 counters are not "damage" and it's toughness is reduced to 0, thus, Fleecemane dies.

    • @svenniepennie4237
      @svenniepennie4237 9 років тому

      ryan151515x
      Ok, when Fleecemane Lion becomes monstrous it gets:
      Hexproof - So Bile Blight can't target it anymore
      A +1/+1 counter - So -3/-3 is not enough to kill it anymore
      Bile Blight is just as useful/useless when it comes to killing Fleecemane Lion as most other removal spells in the format.

    • @AIMLESS-NAMELESS
      @AIMLESS-NAMELESS 3 роки тому

      @@svenniepennie4237 if you have 1 monstros and 1 normal fleece main on board and they swing with the monstrous one you can block and bile the one that’s not monstrous. Way better then the other 2 removal spells for fleece specifically

    • @AIMLESS-NAMELESS
      @AIMLESS-NAMELESS 3 роки тому

      Your also wrong about how indestructible works and even if it’s just a normal fleecemain it’s better then all other removal by mana alone the rest is just gravy

    • @bisonsama321
      @bisonsama321 2 роки тому

      Unfortunately you can’t quite deal deal with an indestructible creature by dealing damage to it then giving it -X/-X. Unless your X is = or > to its toughness anyway.
      Despite what MTGO or MTGA show, damage actually doesn’t change toughness : a damaged creature simply has damage marked on it, and once it has been dealt lethal damage, it dies next time we check state-based actions. But indestructible makes a permanent ignore destruction and lethal damage altogether.
      So if I block a 4/4 indestructible with a 1/1, then -3/-3 said 4/4 (before or after combat damage, doesn’t matter), my opponent still end up with the same thing : a 1/1 indestructible with 1 damage marked on it, which won’t bother dying ‘cause lethal damage can’t kill it.
      But yeah : Bile Blight is still a decent answer to Fleecemane in this matchup due to its very low cost compared to the 5 mana needed to Monstruous the Lion, but it’s not that far from Hero’s Downfall. And none are a 100% clean and reliable answer : some Lions will become Monstruous despite your best efforts.
      I’d say 5-toughness creature (notably ones that can gain Hexproof like Prognostic Sphinx and Reaper of the Wilds) are the closest thing to an actual clean answer to a Monstruous Fleecemane in Parke’s BUG deck.
      Oh. And didn’t quite get it at first but commentators probably actually meant to mention Fleecemane as one of the few maindeck targets in Chapin’s deck that trade 1 for 1 with Bile Blight. They’re not necessarily praising Blight, they’re likely saying it has few good targets in this matchup.

  • @AlleyCatGhost
    @AlleyCatGhost 10 років тому +4

    So, like. Yeah, I can't see the cards...

  • @danbrown7438
    @danbrown7438 10 років тому

    did jamie not know he could grab Elispeth with intusion?

    • @JJ-Toreddie
      @JJ-Toreddie 2 роки тому +1

      Jamie is still contemplating that to this day

  • @jayceehampton6121
    @jayceehampton6121 7 років тому

    I know I never got to say this, but would the fucking judge shut up about their line of play, and let these men think! There is no time limit.

    • @wasteofusername1
      @wasteofusername1 7 років тому

      I'm pretty sure there is a time limit, why would u want someone to think about his turn for 10 minutes

    • @jayceehampton6121
      @jayceehampton6121 7 років тому

      The top 8 has no time limit.

  • @ARQ93
    @ARQ93 10 років тому +5

    dat die roll at the begging >

    • @jakey0017
      @jakey0017 10 років тому +2

      maybe an homage to mcDarby

  • @StravinskyCruz
    @StravinskyCruz 4 роки тому

    Why did jamie let elspeth resolve and make tokens? We could have used heros downfall before resolved. Am i correct?

    • @joebutcher7456
      @joebutcher7456 4 роки тому +3

      Unfortunately not, if a Planeswalker resolves, then the active player retains priority until they take another action. The only opportunity Parke had was to let Chapin select his Elspeth's ability and then respond to the activation. Even if he did this, the ability would resolve and the tokens would then still be made.
      Really, the only way to deal with a Planeswalker ability is to counter it with a Stifle effect such as Disallow or Squelch.
      Hope that clears it up for you my dude :)

    • @StravinskyCruz
      @StravinskyCruz 4 роки тому

      @@joebutcher7456 thanks man

  • @NitroTheRhino
    @NitroTheRhino 10 років тому

    Boros Burn would have obliterated these decks.

  • @thesquirrelwranglers5076
    @thesquirrelwranglers5076 8 років тому

    jamie cheated

  • @Aflay1
    @Aflay1 9 років тому +1

    I don't understand why they play their cards like that. I mean, I know it's competitive, but they really take it a step further with the finesse of how they play their cards.Either a lot of time to spend, or a prerogative, maybe slight of hand?

  • @jakob187
    @jakob187 10 років тому

    The overall lack of Herald of Torment in these BUG decks is truly disturbing.
    Reaper + Herald = godlike. Add in Golgari Charm at a 1x or 2x, and you can keep Reaper of Torment alive through a Supreme Verdict unless it gets countered. It's literally nigh unstoppable, and with the amount of card draw available to a BUG deck, getting a Golgari Charm is almost a given. Then again, against Esper and Azorius control decks...even Patriot control, I have not had a problem sweeping the round with a BUG deck. It just outclasses it in a lot of big ways.
    I've been running that combo with my BUG deck, and it gets work done. Those two cards together stops Stormbreath and D-Demon, prevents an Arbor Colossus monstrosity, and gives you what I think is a slightly stronger flyer than Prog Sphinx.
    Nonetheless, I'm so happy to see people realizing the power of Prog Sphinx. I've been playing him for a while within multiple different decks, and that 3 damage stacks up after a while. Moreover, he's nearly impossible to remove from the board, especially in a deck where you'll almost always have at least three cards in your hand.

    • @ignis49
      @ignis49 10 років тому +2

      do you not know what block constructed is? there's no supreme verdict and no golgari charm so why would they play herald of torment to combo with reaper?

    • @jakob187
      @jakob187 10 років тому

      I know what block constructed is. My comments were directed towards overall standard play, and I did not specify that in my comment. That is my bad. However, even in current standard, those same decks are still seeing a lack of Reaper of Torment in them...as well as Master of the Feast...or just in general, BUG decks aren't seeing play at ALL. It's sad, as the deck is a lot of fun and plays with some great tempo. I've been consistently at a minimum 3-1 on FNMs, and as soon as I can get to a bigger tourney, I'll find out how the deck does in that situation.