The Celts Who Went to China
Вставка
- Опубліковано 25 сер 2024
- Read: The United States and Great Britain In Prophecy - www.tomorrowsw...
In 1934, Swedish archaeologist Folke Bergman excavated a burial site near Ürümchi in Northwestern China. The inhabitants of the tombs were not what you would expect for the region. They were Caucasian in appearance, with red hair and tartan clothing. Bergman reportedly noted how similar the remains were to Bronze Age Danish burial sites with their embroidered clothing and the bodies entombed in what appeared to be upside-down boat coffins. If these were the mummified remains of Indo-Europeans, what were they doing buried in ancient China? This is the story of the Celts who migrated to the far east.
----------
www.tomorrowsworldviewpoint.org
Viewpoint Archives - www.lcgCanada.o...
Subscribe here:
/ tomorrowsworldviewpoint
#celts #china #migration
Celts and Tocharians are closely related, but they are not the same ethnicity
They were originally. They mix and mingle as they travel
The Celts also lived in Galatia in Central Turkey.
So were they Celts or were they Tocharians? They aren't the same thing.
So are you Canadian or British.
They aren't the same thing.
Tocharians actually related to Celts by language group.
they both belong to Centum branch while in Asia nobody belongs to it
@riverbend well said
@@Ringerofthelie I say related, I found some very related words
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat nope they are even older than celts
Tocharians probably aren't Celts.
closely related
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat that doesn't mean same
@@pronoy2108 Yes, they are related but not same
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat not even closely related. Tocharians where the most distinct indo-European speakers in history. They likely split directly off of Porto-indo-European as did the the Ancient Anatolians. If anything, Tocharians could probably be related to the Indo-Iranian speakers since at the time they were close geographically.
@@alechinshaw5990 Tocharian words with Celtic.
Toc: Façer, Luwo, Wartow, Ni, Nem, Naş.
Celt: Fatir, Luwa, Wrida, Mi, Nem, Nos.
Tocharians are sons of ANE people that become later Europeans when some of it migrated to Europe.
Celtic one is closely related to Tocharians than Iranians
3:00 he randomly starts talking about the 'tribes of israel'. Apparently I have wanderer into a religious nutcase channel...
You realize that the tribes of Israel were a real thing right? This is not a religious channel, he is talking about history according to the Bible. You may not comprehend this with your clear anti-Christian bias walnut brain but the Bible is actually a chronicle of history with mythological elements. There is tons of accurate information and recordings of history in the Bible, that’s what he was talking about. You should research things before you flap your new age gums
Isrealite are not indo European so don't try to link with indo European. Jesus was semitic not indo European. Present jews are white because of mixed marriage for centuries.
true
I agree also the real Jews are black people in America.
present Jews are white because they are descended from Khazarian converts
The more dna done in ancient burial sites in the levant show MORE European DNA and less semite the older it goes.
Israelites came from Hyksos expulsion exodus ... King tut Hyksos royalty like Jesus! Tut's DNA is of today's NW Europe not Semitic...
more videos like these would be good.
The Celtic Tocharian connection proves that PIE started in Western Europe!
The 10 tribes didn't go into Asia as Flavius Josephus said
Thank you Viewpoint
Thanks for such insight.
Thanks for this info. God bless!
Wasn't China in those days. Far from it
Interesting! God did promise Abraham that his seed through Isaac would multiply as the sands of the seashore and wind up having been on every part of the globe! But I never knew that they actually had made it to China though I've read the booklet mentioned, and also Judah's Septre and Joseph's Birthright! It's good to learn things one doesn't know! Thank You for this Viewpoint.
I had heard that some of the Israelites ended up in the areas of China and places east but I had never heard the proof of it.
# Ally Maddox
@@TRISTANTHEGAMER one day you will stand before him seek Jesus Christ in your life before that happens!
I can’t believe it and if it’s ever true I don’t like it
Great man as always 👏 👍
Dear friend, this burials are east eurasian + west eurasian mixtures very similar to finno-ugric and turkic people. Also as you may know, udmurts and some other uralic people are reddish haired people, not only celts are reddish. Moreover, I think celts are scythian related people. So many people think that scythians are iranic, but this is not so true.
Moreover, R1a, R1b ydna are descendants of P1 ydna as still existing mostly inside altai, tuva, soyot turkic and nivkh people. Moreover, first R* ydna is 25k years old and found in siberia (same as soyot region). Soyot, saka, scythian names are tribe names of both culturally and genetically similar people. (descendants of afontova gora, mal'ta buret cultures)
sources needed
@@yeetman4953 These people located in China are turkic people. Chinese sources mentions about turkic people in these regions.
@@serkankinden5150 are you gonna tell me now that blue eyes and red hair is a turkic feature?
@@yeetman4953 No, I say just that there are some hazel eyed, reddish haired turkic people. But, less people obviously...
@@serkankinden5150 yes because before the turks expanded to the western steppes, there were scythian and other eastern iranian speaking peoples
Starting with wrong assumptions. Not Kelts, but the Schythians inhabited east into the steppe. It is accepted to call those Schythians, the Sarmats. It is possible that they started the Toxharian settlements and invaded further East.
Yet one more bit of a fascinating puzzle. Thank you.
That doesn't even make sense, celts were indo-european, while basically everyone in the bible/fairytale was semitic.
@SrArjamann that video is false propaganda, I counted out a mistake, and most parts of the bible are a fairytale
Can anybody tell me what the tribes of Israel have to do with these Celts?
Cimmerians maby, they had red hair, I think they became the keltoi
BS, if their Celts how come they are R1a1 and not R1b.
R1 lines come from the same Original Father as R1a & R1b are just subclades
👍
I noticed Turkic and English French people are looking same you look like Azerbaijanian
this has nothing to do with the vid tf are you yapping about
Im a celt lol anyone else
They aren’t the lost tribes,lol.I’m U5 white haplogroup and our Northern European Male fathers were R1A AND R1B
Jeepers man. Some commentators should just do their own research.
Nothing anyone else post is ever "correct".
There are quite a few factual errors in the film.
All scientific research so far points unequivocally to links between the Tochars and the pre-Slavic Balts and Arians
This is evidenced above all by the haplogroups (archaeogenomics) of the Tochars (mummy studies).
This is indicated by the rituals of the Tochars, which are characteristic of the peoples of Eurasia and not of the Celts, including sacred symbolism (swastikas).
The Tochar language was studied mainly by Germans, and what is characteristic of much of the research of German linguists, they do not consider Slavic or Baltic languages in comparisons at all. In 2019, a team of Western linguists in a publication stated unequivocally that previous research on the Tocharian language(including claiming to be a Kentum language) is flawed and needs to be done anew. One only needs to analyse the words of the surviving Tochar manuscripts to see that the vast majority of them have similarities with Old Slavic and Aryan languages (mainly Sanskrit). Few words show a resemblance to Greek, and those that show analogies with languages such as Celtic, French, Deutsch, English, hardly at all. so why lie, just reach for the research.
Celts came from Eurasia.
One of Israel’s preeminent kings was Omri, noted for his conquests and for building the fortress-capital city of Samaria. Reigning for 12 years- from about 887 to 876 BC-Omri was exceedingly wicked before God (I Kings 16:25). Yet his son, Ahab, who succeeded him, “did more to provoke the LORD God of Israel to anger than all the kings of Israel who were before him” (verse 33).
Omri established a dynasty that lasted only 50 years, but it was one that achieved internal stability and relative peace with Israel’s neighbors. New and far-reaching strategic-economic alliances were formed under Omri, who was widely known for his shrewd political maneuverings. Long after his dynasty died out, the prophet Micah gave this warning from God concerning certain “statutes” of Omri: “For the statutes of Omri are [still] kept [followed], and all the [idolatrous] works of the [evil] house of Ahab [are maintained], and you [continue to] walk in their counsels, so that I should make you [as a nation] a desolation…” (Micah 6:16).
While it is uncertain as to the exact nature of Omri’s “statutes,” most scholars agree that they were not directly religious; rather, they were most likely politically oriented principles designed to guide leaders in matters of foreign policy. Omri was a master strategist, bent on establishing peace and prosperity his way-without relying on God’s intervention or blessing. Thus, his materialistic, humanistic “statutes” represented man’s best efforts at dominance and preservation-even if it required religiously prostituting the nation before the world.
Why is this important in locating the tribes of Israel? As shrewd and evil as he was, Omri earned the respect of the surrounding nations- especially Assyria. Because of his various military and economic exploits, Omri was regarded as the founder of the “kingdom of Samaria.” As a result, the surrounding nations often referred to Israel as Beth Khumri-the House of Omri. The Ancient History of the Near East records: “Omri was one of the most important of the kings of Israel, and may be regarded as the founder of the power of the kingdom. To the Assyrians, he was a sort of eponymous hero of his country, for they called it Bit Humri, ‘House of Omri.’ ” Concerning Omri, Langer’s Encyclopedia of World History notes: “The Assyrians called Israel after his name, Bit Omri (Khumri).” The History Department of the University College of London gives this confirmation: “The Kingdom of Israel was known to the Assyrians after its [assumed] founder, as Bit Humri, House of Omri.” Bit or Beth Omri both mean “House of Omri.”
Over time, “House of Omri” became synonymous with “House of Israel.” When other nations referred to Israel’s kings, they called them sons of Omri. Among Assyrian kings the name Omri was consistently used for Israel, starting with Shalmaneser III (who ruled during the time of Ahab) and extending some 100 years (and beyond) to Sargon II, who oversaw the fall of Samaria. As we will see, the Persians and Babylonians also had alternative names for Israel.
Under Shalmaneser III, Israel’s King Jehu (841-814 BC) was forced to pay tribute. Shalmaneser recorded this fact on a black limestone sculpture known as the “Black Obelisk of Shalmaneser III.” The obelisk depicts five different subdued kings, including Jehu, prostrate before the Assyrian king. The inscription reads: Ia-u-a mar Hu-um-ri-i or “Jehu of the House of Omri.” Importantly, the terms Khumri or Humri (variants of Omri) prove to be a vital key in locating the “lost” tribes of ancient Israel.
From this time Omri appears in numerous archaeological finds, spanning well over a century, identifying Israel as the House of Omri, while the name Israel gradually fell into disuse. For example, following the fall of Samaria in 722 BC-some 150 years from Omri’s time-Sargon II recorded his triumph in a paving. According to Expedition Magazine, the inscription reads: “Property of Sargon, conqueror of Samaria and the entire country of Bit Omri.”
The variants of the name Omri-Khumri, Humri, Chumri, Gimri, etc.-are but different spellings and pronunciations extant among the nations of the region. For example, Khumri was Assyrian for Omri, while Gimri was the Babylonian version (the kh was pronounced g).
Discovered in northwestern Iran, the “Behistun Rock” (dating from 515 BC) identifies a group of Israelite tribes by different names. On this rock, the Babylonian name for Israel is Gimri. As archeologists and linguistics experts have discovered, Gimri, over time, became Gimmira, from which comes the Hellenized version, Cimmerian. As one source notes, “Gimri comes from [the Assyrian] Khumri (out of the biblical name Omri) and goes through Gimmira and the Greek Kimmerioi to Cimmerian.”
The Bible Research Handbook notes: “The [Behistun] rock carries on its face an important cuneiform inscription of Darius Hystaspes (Darius the Great). This inscription, which was cut circa 516 BC, records in three languages-Persian, Susian (Median), and Babylonian-the names of twenty-three provinces subject to him. In the Persian and Susian versions, one of these provinces is called Scythia, the root of which is, phonetically, Sak. In the Babylonian text, this [same] province is called ‘(matu) Gimiri,’ translated, ‘land of the Cimmerians.’ ”
Not only does the Behistun inscription identify the Gimiri with the Cimmerians, it also links Scythians to the Cimmerians. Thus, as we will see, Cimmerians and Scythians are both of the same stock-Israelite.
Key historical sources describe the Cimmerians-who seemingly appeared out of nowhere-as a nomadic people originating from areas south of the Caucasus Mountains, in what would today be southern Armenia, eastern Turkey, and northwest Iran. This is exactly where the Assyrians had placed most of the exiled Israelites. Moreover, the earliest historical records noting the appearance of the Cimmerians identify them as the Gimri-the House of Omri. “The first historical record of the Cimmerians appears in Assyrian annals in the year 714 BC [a mere eight years after the fall of Samaria]. These [records] describe how a people termed the Gimirri [a variant of Gimri or Omri] helped the forces of Sargon II to defeat the kingdom of Urartu [an old name for Armenia].”
Sargon reigned until 705 BC. Like all Assyrian kings, he kept records of the political and military activities of the day. Thousands of clay tablets have been discovered in the ancient Assyrian capital city of Nineveh, which appear to be official military records. In some of these records, dating from 707 BC, the Gimirri are said to be in alliance with the Assyrians, serving as mercenaries (at other times they fought against the Assyrians). Because of their positions along the northern-northeastern frontier of the Assyrian Empire, the relocated tribes served as a “buffer state” for the Assyrians against their enemies. A large group of Gimirri (Cimmerian Israelites) were specifically settled in an area called Mannae to function as a buffer between Assyria and Media.
The Greek astronomer-geographer Ptolemy (2nd century AD) placed the Cimmerians in the area roughly defined by modern-day Georgia-the southernmost area between the Black and Caspian Seas. According to local history, the Cimmerians were highly influential in the development of the culture of that region. In fact, in Georgian, the Cimmerians were known as the Gimirri. Notice: “The modern-day Georgian word for hero, gmiri, is derived from the word Gimirri. This refers to the Cimmerians who settled in the area after [their] initial conquests. Some modern authors assert that the Cimmerians included mercenaries, whom the Assyrians knew as Khumri, who had been resettled there by Sargon.”
Yair Davidy writes: “The Cimmerians had first appeared on the [northern] fringes of the Assyrian Empire shortly after the majority of northern Israelites had been exiled…. In about 707 BC, a people named ‘Gimirae’ [a variation of Gimri, or Omri] were reported from the region of Mannae. These are the Cimmerians. They were referred to as ‘outcasts’ by the Assyrians.” Davidy adds that the area of Mannae is referred to in Amos 4:3-“you [the tribes of Israel] shall be cast off to Harmon” (see NKJV, etc.) Accordingly, Harmon (or Harmonah) is derived from Har-Mannae- the Mountain of Mannae. This area, he writes, became a Cimmerian stronghold shortly after Israel’s exile.
As previously noted, the Behistun Rock identifies the Israelites by different names. The inscriptions on this unique monument tell a distinct narrative in three languages-Babylonian, Persian, and Median. References in the Babylonian tongue to the Gimri are well established as pointing to the Israelites. In the Persian narrative, Israelite tribes are called the Sakka. Moreover, trilingual inscriptions found on the tomb of Darius I also connect the Gimir with the Sakka, proving that they are related peoples. Recall that Sargon had resettled some of the Israelite tribes among the “cities of the Medes” (II Kings 17:6)-further east of where most of the tribes had been taken. It was in this area of Media-then under Assyrian control-that a portion of the “lost” tribes became known as the Sakka (or Saka).
But what is the origin of the term Sakka?
God had indicated that the name Isaac would always be used to identify Israel as a people: “For in Isaac your seed shall be called”-or named (Gen. 21:12). A better translation would be, “It is from Isaac that your seed will take its name.” Did the tribes of Israel ever refer to themselves as “sons of Isaac”? Indeed, the prophet Amos notes that the Israelite tribes were sometimes called the “House of Isaac.” About 750 BC, some 30 years before the fall of Samaria, Amos wrote: “And the high places [idolatrous shrines] of Isaac shall be desolate, and the holy places of Israel [built at Dan and Bethel] shall be laid waste…” (Amos 7:9). Using a common literary technique called “parallelism,” Isaac is here equated with Israel. God told Amos, “Go, prophesy to My people [the northern tribes of] Israel” (verse 15). Yet Amaziah, a priest of Bethel (verse 10), had chided Amos: “Do not prophesy against Israel, and do not drop words against the house of Isaac” (verse 16)-again, showing that the phrase “House [sons] of Isaac” was used to identify Israel.
As we will see, the name Isaac would be indelibly imprinted on a major portion of the Israelite peoples, uniquely identifying them as they migrated from one area to another in search of a new home.
With the accent on the last syllable (as is typical in Hebrew), Isaac is pronounced Yit-zak (or ee-sahk). Typically, the first syllable would have been dropped or ignored in other languages, leading simply to zak or sahk. Hence, the name Isaac becomes Saac or Saccae (plural). Remember, biblical Hebrew was written without vowels. Using English equivalents, this means Isaac would be spelled Sk or Sc-without the vowels. Thus, it is not surprising that shortly after the exile the Persians referred to the sons of Isaac as Saka-or the Sacae (the ae being the Latin plural ending, added later). Consequently, numerous historians are convinced that Sakka was derived phonetically from ee-sahk, and that certain Israelite tribes became known among the Persians as the Sakka (also Sacae and Iskuza) because of their claim to be sons of Isaac.
Among the Greeks, the Sakka were typically called Scythians. As the Encyclopedia Britannica states, the terms “Saka (Sacae) … and Scyths [Scythians] … were regarded as synonymous.” History records that the Scythians appeared suddenly along the northern border of Media-about the same time the Gimri appeared further to the west. “Within half a century of the House of Israel going into exile, the Scythians were mentioned for the first time in … documents which date from the reign of Esarhaddon, King of Assyria (681-669 BC).” The documents “reveal that the Scythians were then located among the Medes where the Bible tells us that some of the Israelites had been placed in captivity (II Kings 18: 11)…. The same documents also prove that another new people called Gimiri were also located in the same area at that time…. [Thus,] we may conclude that [both tribal groups] were actually the same people under different names.”
The following gives support to the close association between the Gimri (Cimmerians) and the Sakka (Scythians): “About 707 BC, a people going by the name of Gimera or Gamera [Gimri] are recorded living among the Mannai in a territory close to Media. This is where the Israelites had been placed about 15 years earlier. Another people to suddenly appear in the land of Mannai were the Iskuza. Modern historians tell us that the Iskuza were called Skuthai [Scythians] by the Greeks and Sacae by the Persians. Sir Henry Rawlinson [a renowned historian and researcher] regarded the Gimiri or Cimmerians and the Sacae as the same people and said they were Israelites. Rawlinson’s statement is as follows: ‘We have reasonable grounds for regarding the Gimiri, or Cimmerians, who first appeared on the [northern] confines of Assyria and Media in the seventh century (BC), and the Sacae … as identical with [exiled] Israel.’ ”
Many researchers, such as Davidy, consider the two groups to be practically identical: “[The] mountain of Mannae [associated with the Gimri] … shortly after the exile became a Cimmerian and Scythian center, the Cimmerians and Scythians being in effect one people.” He continues: “In about 676 BC, a new element, known as [the] Ishkuza, emerged from the Cimmerian ranks; these are identified with the Scythians who the Persians and Babylonians referred to as the Saka. Both names, Ishkuza and Saka, may be understood as forms of the name Isaac.”
The Greek historian Herodotus, writing in the fifth century BC, also links the Sacae with the Scythians; likewise, Ptolemy refers to the Sacae as Saxons-literally “Isaac’s sons.” In The History of the Anglo-Saxons, historian Sharon Turner writes: “The Saxons [who historically settled in the British Isles] were a … Scythian tribe.” Moreover, “the Sakai, or Sacae, are the people from whom the descent of the Saxons may be inferred…. Sakai-Suna, or the sons of the Sakai, abbreviated into Saksun, which is the same sound as Saxon, seems a reasonable etymology of the word Saxon.”20 Again, Davidy notes: “Saccae was the contemporary Middle Eastern term [associated with] Scyth, and the name is believed to be a derivative of Isaac.”
In Hebrew, those who “dwell in tents” are Scuthi-or, as we could say, Succothites (from succoth, booths; see Genesis 33:17). Hence, Scythian(or Skuthai) suggests a nomadic lifestyle. In fact, God had said Israel would become “wanderers among the nations” (Hosea 9:17).
The evidence is quite clear. While the exiled Israelite tribes along the northern border of Assyria were reemerging as the Cimmerians, those tribes toward the east in Media were reemerging as the Scythians. To the world, the exiled Israelites seemed to have vanished as a people. But they did not vanish at all-nor were they “lost.” They simply reappeared in history under new names-as nomadic peoples, separated into semi-independent tribes or groupings of tribes. As the evidence indicates, the groups interacted freely- marrying, trading, warring together-as they were all of Israelite blood!
As was foretold by Amos, God would sift the Israelite tribes among the nations-a fate made possible only by the fact that a sizable remnant of those tribes had become well established (even feared) in the regions of their exile. Indeed, the Cimmerians and the Scythians had become forces of influence in the areas just south of the Black and Caspian Seas. Soon, these reestablished tribes would begin major migrations to the north and the west. Such migrations would take the Israelites into numerous new areas- effectively sifting them still further among the nations-yet, as Amos writes, “not one kernel of grain would fall to the ground.” This means the Israelite tribes would not die out or become extinct, but would continue migrating until God fully reestablished them in new homelands in accordance with the promises made to Abraham-specifically those birthright promises made to Ephraim and Manasseh.
Once we realize that the Cimmerians and the Scythians were actually regrouped Israelites, we can trace their migrations by these (and other) “transitional names”-names which have left their mark on history as the “lost” tribes moved to eventually overspread much of Europe.
Det är tokhariska.det är inte celtska
Tocharians were not Celts. Tocharians probably descended mainly from Afanasievo culture.
Long live chairman Mao
Tocharians are not Celts. This is bullshit
Plot twist: The tomb with the Caucasian mummies is transported from europe to the middle of the slik world. Iit is a danish burial site picked up and place in Xinjiang by an ancient civilization. 💀
schizo plot