TV Antenna Scams Are Flooding the Market! (Why?) - Krazy Ken’s Tech Talk

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 чер 2024
  • ⬇️ Check Out Laifen Wave ⬇️
    Official Website: bit.ly/4aLmP2B
    Amazon: amzn.to/3UqRaxL
    You can support this channel on Patreon! Link below…
    The internet is FLOODED with TV antenna scams. Today, let's analyze the fake claims, test the products for real, and discuss why this scam is happening in the first place…
    Watch my TVFix episode! ● • Is TVFix a Scam? (Yes,...
    Watch my $100 laptop episode ● • XO-1: The $100 Laptop ...
    Watch more SCAM-BUSTERS ● • Scam Tech
    Get My Free Wallpapers! ● thecomputerclan.com/wallpapers
    Follow me on Twitter ● / thecomputerclan
    Facebook ● / computerclan
    😎Shop for cool stuff on my store ● thecomputerclan.com/etsy
    ⭐️Support the Computer Clan on Patreon ● / krazyken
    👆Patrons got early ad-free access to this episode. They also got behind-the-scenes access, Discord VIP access, and their names in the credits! Pledge now to get those awesome perks, and help fund the future of the Computer Clan! Thanks for your support.
    Special thanks to Brainiac Brent for taking the lead on this investigation and helping make the episode possible! And big thanks to my amazing Feedback Team!
    Extra thanks to radio folks who helped with the script:
    Damian Garcia (@kalimamed41)
    Addie Chernow
    Matt (Ryoohk)
    Tyler Letlebo
    ☁️Learn more about ducting thecomputerclan.com/duct
    📱Contact Us ● thecomputerclan.com/contact
    🎬Get royalty-free stock footage with Artgrid. Sign up with my link to support the channel and get 2 extra months free: bit.ly/clan2Dr3M3e
    🎵I also use Artlist for the music in my videos. I highly recommend them 👌 Click for 2 extra months free: bit.ly/clan2LBaKov
    🎥Get film gear I use ● amzn.to/2hmJhHU
    On a lower budget? ● amzn.to/2hLrJBL
    Computer Clan is an Amazon Associate. Amazon links are powered by the Amazon Associates Program and the Computer Clan may receive a commission. Artlist and Artgrid links are also affiliate links.
    00:00 Introduction
    00:55 Scam Antennas (Overview)
    04:02 Scam Antennas (Breakdown)
    10:25 Building a Test Course
    12:38 Antenna Test (Round 1)
    15:03 How Radio Waves Work
    17:09 Antenna Test (Round 2)
    18:37 Why is This Scam Happening?
    #KrazyKen #ComputerClan #Laifen
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,9 тис.

  • @ComputerClan
    @ComputerClan  Місяць тому +52

    ⬇ Check Out Laifen Wave ⬇ (Thanks for letting me make an Apple parody!)
    Official Website: bit.ly/4aLmP2B
    Amazon: amzn.to/3UqRaxL

    • @brvsta
      @brvsta Місяць тому +3

      ok

    • @Av-vd3wk
      @Av-vd3wk Місяць тому +4

      Antenna Man needs to watch this and give us his take. Anyone wise watch his channel?

    • @Jan12700
      @Jan12700 Місяць тому +14

      Thats also a Scam Product

    • @DeltaStormYT
      @DeltaStormYT Місяць тому

      @ComputerClan Companies get discounted rates if they are a registered US business. Which has no requirements other than to register, lol. These "people" if you want to call drop shippers that... they move from fraudulant company to fraudulant company likly also tax evading, mashing a keyboard on the SBA website when it asks for company name. Volia Bzoxauy

    • @AiLoveAidoru
      @AiLoveAidoru Місяць тому +24

      I’m sorry Ken I know you need that bag but my BS detector has been off the charts with a lot of your recent sponsors.
      You NEED to look into these products before you decide to take their money because putting a price tag on your honesty in scam exposing videos is very dangerous and something that less reputable creators that have been exposed in the past year have practiced.

  • @MakeItWithCalvin
    @MakeItWithCalvin Місяць тому +723

    For those who are wondering "Who uses TV Antennas!?" my late grandmother used them to pick up PBS and local TV stations when she lived in San Francisco. In her case paying for cable, and getting it installed, was more work than it was worth. Also, people living in RVs and similar will watch TV that's broadcast over the air. There ARE amplifying antennas that will amplify the incoming signal, but if you are out of range, you are out of range.

    • @JeremyIbu
      @JeremyIbu Місяць тому +34

      i still use one for football season

    • @pineappleroad
      @pineappleroad Місяць тому +48

      TV antennas are probably the most common way to get “free” TV where i live (there are channels that you can legitimately watch without a subscription where i live, you just have to pay a special tax (I refuse to call it a fee, as they make it so hard to avoid needing to pay it)

    • @speedgriffon2504
      @speedgriffon2504 Місяць тому

      I use an antenna exclusively for free television. My set rarely leaves MeTV or Catchy Comedy, except on Sunday nights when it's time for BritComs on PBS.

    • @samuel-wankenobi
      @samuel-wankenobi Місяць тому +15

      Plus there are a lot of countries in Europe that do

    • @bosstowndynamics5488
      @bosstowndynamics5488 Місяць тому +14

      I think the confusion would be less "why TV antenna?" and more "why TV antenna *now*?" Plenty of reasons to avoid cable but literally everyone buying these has access to the internet, and anyone who's tech illiterate enough to want free to air probably already has it set up. It's a small and shrinking target

  • @allenwelsch2839
    @allenwelsch2839 Місяць тому +279

    Hey there Ken. I'm an RF technician and my compliments to your for the extensive explanation of the various ways the two antennas are garbage. The performance claims are laughable and easily debunked, as you demonstrated. Keep up the good work.

    • @dx1450
      @dx1450 Місяць тому +18

      I'm not an RF technician but an RF hobbyist (ham, scanner, shortwave etc). I live probably about 50 and 80 miles away from our local stations, and you have to have an outdoor antenna up high to be able to see them. There is no indoor antenna which will work. The 500 and 1900 mile claims are utterly ridiculous. Maybe if you were up in space...

    • @dannydaw59
      @dannydaw59 Місяць тому +8

      ​@@dx1450Don't short wave radio signals go thousands of miles? The signal bounces off something in the atmosphere to get it's range.

    • @ve3snw
      @ve3snw Місяць тому +13

      @@dannydaw59 that's correct. Those radio waves are much lower in frequency (30 mhz to 160 mhz) than tv signals so are able to refract from layers in the ionosphere. Their longer wavelengths give them that ability whereas tv frequencies being the much higher frequency ranges (vhf and uhf) and much shorter wavelengths punch through the layers and travel into space. Which is handy if you want to talk to a satellite. The term shortwave is a misnomer and comes from early in the science of radio. The science behind what frequency to use to bounce a signal is quite complicated and ultimately depends on how active the sun is. The solar radiation is what ionizes the layers of gases in the ionosphere and can change hour to hour. Hope that helps a bit.

    • @georgeyreynolds
      @georgeyreynolds Місяць тому +4

      @@dannydaw59 in short that lets ham radio operators hear each other across the planet. I can hear people in the US for example. You definitely need an outdoor antenna system for this.

    • @dx1450
      @dx1450 Місяць тому +4

      @@dannydaw59 Yes, shortwave signals can travel all the way around the world, bouncing from the ionosphere to the ground and back. But shortwave, or HF, is a lot different from VHF/UHF propagation, which is all line-of-sight. TV signals are all VHF/UHF.

  • @Trainfan1055Janathan
    @Trainfan1055Janathan Місяць тому +27

    As someone who knows way too much about lighthouses, "being able to communicate with a lighthouse" could mean two things. Both of them equally absurd.
    Some lighthouses like the Cape Henry Lighthouse have a fog horn that only turns on if a ship requests it by sounding it's horn. The lighthouse can hear the ship's horn and responds by sounding the fog horn.
    Other lighthouses have a radio beacon that plays a pre-recorded message when a ship becomes in range. It'll tell the ship that it's in dangerous waters, its exact location, and directions on how to get to safe waters.
    So either they're advertising that you can ask a lighthouse to activate its fog horn or that you can ask one for directions to the harbor 😂.

    • @ComputerClan
      @ComputerClan  Місяць тому +3

      Fascinating! I don’t think that helps with receiving TV, but fascinating!

    • @JCJW101
      @JCJW101 23 дні тому

      So you work for Big Lighthouse and you're telling us that we can't get 5G 8K TV signals from you even though these antennas clearly can? This is why we need independent media to expose the lies!

  • @SleepNeed
    @SleepNeed Місяць тому +49

    I worked at a broadcast TV station. I remember having to explain to someone in another state over a few hundred miles away why they couldn't get our signal when he called in all pissed off.
    Side note, the FCC has a really nice coverage map where if you insert your address, it can calculate signal strength assuming an antenna on the roof of a three-story house. Not a 1-1 as an antenna plugged into an individual TV that hangs on the wall but it gives you some idea. It's simply called the "DTV Reception Map".

    • @fookingsog
      @fookingsog Місяць тому

      antennawebD0Torg for those wanting to know. Used it alot whilst working for the RatShack in college!!!

    • @dashcamandy2242
      @dashcamandy2242 Місяць тому +5

      The map helpfully shows 11 channels available in my area, although in reality it's off by 10 1/2 channels. ONE channel is listed as having "strong" signal, we cannot receive it at all. In fact, only one DTV channel can be received at my house at all, it's listed as being a "weak" signal, despite being the closest broadcast tower - less than eight miles away. And that's if you don't mind 2/3 of each show on that one channel being a stuttering, blocky mess.
      That's with a two-story house on top of a hill, with the antenna on a 6' pole above the roof peak. We spent several hundreds on "digital-TV-ready" rooftop and household antennas, only to end up getting cable instead so we can finally receive local OTA broadcasts. Before the switch to digital, we used to regularly pick up channels our TV guide didn't even list because who would expect Northern Massachusetts stations to come in fairly well in Southeastern Connecticut?

    • @miniskunk
      @miniskunk Місяць тому +1

      You can of course get stations thousands of miles away with atmosphere ducting, but it's not reliable. I have experienced that once before from California to a Texas station and Nebraska the next day. Never had it happen again. I hear the east coast of Florida sometimes dealt with TV signal interference from New York when the conditions were right during the analog age.

    • @fuzzywzhe
      @fuzzywzhe 22 дні тому

      Was this during NTSC or digital transmission. I worked at RCA as the conversion was being setup. Digital is VASTLY superior to analog. Lower bandwidth, and either you get the transmission or you don't. No more snow. This is because it used QAM transmission. A single bit error will corrupt the transmission.
      Everybody thought analogue was better because it could handle degradation in the signal and still be usable. Digital is vastly superior although either it works, or it doesn't. Lower power transmission, better reliability, better picture and audio quality. This is due to error correction. The bandwidth (the amount of data needed) to send a transmission is VASTLY smaller than it was in analogue, because all you send are the changes of the previous images, you don't send the entire image every time.

    • @UvalCoba
      @UvalCoba 18 днів тому

      I'd like to see that map. Link?

  • @TeleviseGuy
    @TeleviseGuy Місяць тому +240

    I think "I set up BOOTLEG antennas from Amazon in a HAUNTED HOTEL" could be a great clickbait title for this video

    • @user-ng2nt2tx4p
      @user-ng2nt2tx4p Місяць тому +12

      And IF we still had Analog TV it could include "...and Recieved Ghost Images!". 😎
      (Ghost Images were multipath Ghostly Looking Images due to reflections interfering with Analog TV's signals)

    • @exin7778
      @exin7778 Місяць тому +1

      They really do that , have you ever watched Poltergeist the movie that was a true story, you know how I know because the dead told me so through the antenna.

    • @near5148
      @near5148 Місяць тому +1

      Lol

    • @Diablo_Himself
      @Diablo_Himself 15 днів тому

      I think clickbaiting is against the terms of use, same with tag bombing.

  • @Barcrest
    @Barcrest Місяць тому +218

    The sponsor seemed like a scam in itself with all those claims.

    • @r1m.s877
      @r1m.s877 Місяць тому +41

      100%. It's sad what money does to people.

    • @YourComputerExpert
      @YourComputerExpert Місяць тому +26

      "Inspired by Apple" seemed pretty true, though. Especially with that charger location lmao

    • @BlackOmegaVirus
      @BlackOmegaVirus Місяць тому +48

      It is a Scam! I live in Germany and tested the product, I injured my gums and when I wanted to return the product - in Europe it is a regulation that I can do this within 30 days free of charge - I first wanted to make a video explaining what was broken and send the product back at my own expense and risk. The toothbrush is dangerous and the company is highly dubious.

    • @MarceldeJong
      @MarceldeJong Місяць тому

      And I wouldn’t call that attractive. Far too bulky

    • @mrj-charles6383
      @mrj-charles6383 Місяць тому +18

      Yeah I thought he was doing a bit

  • @dashopepper
    @dashopepper Місяць тому +29

    The apartment I grew up in New York City had an unobstructed view of the two most powerful antennas in the country: the Empire State Building and the World Trade Center.
    Furthest north I could receive a signal from was Boston, MA, furthest west was Wilkes-Barre, PA, furthest south was Atlanta, GA...and this was regular over-the-air broadcast television. So, I averaged between 300 to 870 miles of clear reception most days.
    I had to bring in videotaped evidence of the various station's call signs to get my science teachers to believe that I wasn't making it up.

    • @miniskunk
      @miniskunk Місяць тому +2

      That is impressive! My record is just over 1,300 miles away for TV signals in the analog age.

    • @jplacido9999
      @jplacido9999 Місяць тому +5

      BBC TV was received in Australia but that's low VHF black and white high power London transmiter.
      I received BBC TV 1 (low VHF) from London , here in Portugal on a daily basis. Also TF1 (low VHF) from Eiffel tower in Paris also on a daily basis.
      Huge 8 element directional antenna with pre-amp and bandpass filter (with antenna rotator).
      All VHF and UHF modern TV transmiters near the border from Spain. And on a daily basis the Sevilha (south Spain) low VHF channel E4 transmiter (TVE 1).
      Not bad....(26m above ground, rotator on the tower, big top german made precision antennas with good pre-amplifiers and filters, low loss triple shielded coax cables)

    • @The_Smuggler_
      @The_Smuggler_ Місяць тому

      As the sun moves around the world it causes the ionosphere to harden and can cause radio waves to bounce back toward the earth.
      If you tried watching the same channels late at night it likely wouldn't work.

    • @jplacido9999
      @jplacido9999 Місяць тому +2

      @@The_Smuggler_
      Not really.
      It only works at Long, Medium and Short Waves (150 KHz - 8 MHz)

    • @miniskunk
      @miniskunk Місяць тому

      @@The_Smuggler_ For extreme distances this is true. I had DXed closer TV stations during the evening/night when the weather is right.

  • @kaa522
    @kaa522 Місяць тому +10

    I started out repairing TVs in the mid-late 1960's and left it at the end of 1979. I can tell you that various scams such as these were fairly common back then. During the time was when the wide adoption of color came in and many people were buying their first color sets. Back then just the addition of the word "Color" was added onto nearly all antennas to convince the customer that you had to buy a new antenna along with your shiney new color TV. Analog color sets required a bit more signal than B&W to look good but that's about it. As someone who's spend his entire career as an electronics technician I've got a pretty tight BS filter about all these scams...

  • @speedgriffon2504
    @speedgriffon2504 Місяць тому +126

    Communicating with lighthouses?! SOLD!

    • @BillAnt
      @BillAnt Місяць тому +10

      That's lame, I wanna receive TV stations from Mars yo. :D :D

    • @liam3284
      @liam3284 Місяць тому +3

      Clearly this is what I need for my ship, to talk to lightstation keepers.

    • @midcenturymodern9330
      @midcenturymodern9330 25 днів тому +1

      Now, that's lit! Wait! What?

  • @Super_Austinator_Archived
    @Super_Austinator_Archived Місяць тому +331

    Those scamtenna names are as catchy as Sony’s names for their headphones.
    (edit: what did I start in the comments)

    • @rejectedprojects7702
      @rejectedprojects7702 Місяць тому +24

      Sony can never name there shit

    • @razvanschuster5058
      @razvanschuster5058 Місяць тому +23

      ​@@rejectedprojects7702 gonna be the nerd and say "Umm it's ackschually their 🤓"

    • @kuebby
      @kuebby Місяць тому +5

      @@razvanschuster5058 Oh, you went there! They're just wondering why their brain hurts now.

    • @lukedavis436
      @lukedavis436 Місяць тому +31

      I mean true.....Sony names are hard
      K800i - Phone
      PCG-F808K - Laptop
      LBT-XB6 - Stereo
      And then you have Playstation 3....*until you look on the bottom and it's actually an CECH-LO3*

    • @cliffordreynolds1835
      @cliffordreynolds1835 Місяць тому +6

      Yeah but they make good stuff. I will probably be buying a set of "Linkbuds S" in the future.

  • @The8BitGuy
    @The8BitGuy Місяць тому +10

    Great video! Reminds me of the ridiculous claims you see on walkie talkie ranges these days. I'm seen stupid GMRS radios claim 100 miles of range.

  • @davidsradioroom9678
    @davidsradioroom9678 Місяць тому +4

    I am a radio/TV hobbyist. I am well aware of the scams out there. Your video is excellent in debunking their falsehoods. I bought a cheap $20 butterfly TV antenna, but I was aware of its limitations, and it did the job I need it to do. I didn't get any cable channels, but I was able to receive most local stations. Let buyers beware!

  • @sublimationman
    @sublimationman Місяць тому +148

    Ken, those funky company names has a reason. They need a unique name to sell on Amazon and since the accounts are disposable (Amazon will eventually shut them down) the easiest way to get a unique name that won't likely conflict with a 'real' company is to keyboard smash one, this should also be a big hint when buying, if the seller or product name is not even pronounceable then it's likely a scam.

    • @BoxOfToasters
      @BoxOfToasters Місяць тому +7

      Half As Interesting did a video on that!

    • @volvo09
      @volvo09 Місяць тому

      Absolutely! If the brand is as ridiculous as zkxon, boysun, etc, it's a cookie cutter "company".

    • @cat1554
      @cat1554 Місяць тому

      I saw one named EVILCO once.

    • @Robutube1
      @Robutube1 Місяць тому +2

      Very useful info - thanks!

    • @Robutube1
      @Robutube1 Місяць тому +2

      Why isn't this channel much MUCH larger? I'm a dedicated luddite and yet I eagerly consume every episode!

  • @MarkReedUK
    @MarkReedUK Місяць тому +125

    In the UK TV antennas have a range of about "to the next hill" or "just past that big tree" lol

    • @endymallorn
      @endymallorn Місяць тому +3

      Try mounting them to a higher pole or other fixed location.

    • @donnyjepp
      @donnyjepp Місяць тому +17

      ​@@endymallornI presume you're not from the UK....😂

    • @MarkReedUK
      @MarkReedUK Місяць тому +12

      @@endymallorn at my parents old house we were on the wrong side of a hill withe the wrong type of trees half way between the London and Meridian transmitters. We were advised we should have needed a 30 foot pole to put the areal on attached the the chimney (plus a reinforced chimney, roof works etc), in the end we just got cable that was new to the area at the time lol

    • @originaldcjensen
      @originaldcjensen Місяць тому +8

      No lighthouses?

    • @fatrobin72
      @fatrobin72 Місяць тому +5

      ​@@endymallorndamn Poles are already high enough if you ask our papers...

  • @Schmoogie
    @Schmoogie Місяць тому +1

    I just want to appreciate that you've been providing closed captions for your videos for all these years. I assure you it goes appreciated ❤️

  • @failbot1986
    @failbot1986 Місяць тому +102

    As someone who works for "the cord" I wanted to throw out there that even our systems have serious limits with local channel insertion, because even a 150' tall directional terrestrial antenna still has to obey physics.

    • @kstricl
      @kstricl Місяць тому +2

      I know of a small ISP that used to shoot a backbone connection about 80km. But, it was two peaks on the side of a valley, and high grade gear designed for that. I believe it took four links total to get from their office to where the fiber connection was. Even with purchasing the gear, maintenance, etc it was still like 1/10 the cost over leasing fiber directly to their office.

    • @johngoodin3445
      @johngoodin3445 Місяць тому +2

      Yeah one key reason why you can't get a 150 foot super antenna mask up in the air? All the red tape you have to go through just to erect it. If the FCC wasn't enough. You have to permanently have blinking red lights every 50 ft or so to comply with the FAA standards as a guard against low flying aircraft at night. And a a 150 ft dude that's half the height of a football field.

    • @liam3284
      @liam3284 Місяць тому +2

      Our telephone network used to have large towers carrying microwave links hundreds of km between mountain peaks. Most are decomissioned now.

    • @johngoodin3445
      @johngoodin3445 Місяць тому +1

      @@liam3284 Since the towers are so tall they would be a great backup location for emergency services to get information out to the general public. Such as the emergency broadcast service in the USA and the USA national weather service could use these locations for emergency backup locations should the main antenna locations be damaged. In the USA we have NOAA weather radio stations. Such as a tornado could damage these stations and put them out of commission for months. Good to have a backup plan and location to get the general emergency information out to the general public. Most of these stations only have a 35 mile coverage radius. The emergency NOAA weather radios in people’s homes and businesses the same range. Asking folks to connect with a station over that 35 miles radius would be impossible. But should a station go down they often ask people to connect with an adjoining station almost 60 miles away. They often say that connecting to a station over 35-40 miles away is problematic, even under the best circumstances, using a quality receiver perfect working order. Better to have something local as a backup. It’s just a matter of the old advice of not having all of your eggs in one basket.

    • @fuzzywzhe
      @fuzzywzhe 22 дні тому

      I work on the Internet, we're putting you out of business because you insist on packaging. We're going to put streaming services that bundle out of business as well. We have given you 2 decades to stop pulling this crap, we've been patient, you won't reform on pushing propaganda and things people do NOT want, so your corporation dug its own grave. We have been extremely patient.
      We will fracture the Internet too. THIS site pushes garbage people don't want to see, relentlessly. Seeing the other sites pop up? We're going to return choice to this system, and we're going to eliminate push propaganda.

  • @shanethrelfall416
    @shanethrelfall416 Місяць тому +54

    It’s well known that every 12th person in the U.K. has access to their own personal Lighthouse
    Contacting the lighthouse using TV antennas has been a family tradition before the TV was even thought of

    • @BoxOfToasters
      @BoxOfToasters Місяць тому +9

      Yeah, I remember moving to the UK when I was 4 and receiving our lighthouse

    • @fookingsog
      @fookingsog Місяць тому +5

      Insert RickRoll: 😂 !!!

    • @klausstock8020
      @klausstock8020 Місяць тому +9

      Yes. You noted the "outdoor & indoor" claim in the ad I guess.
      You just don't see all the lighthouses in the UK because most are indoor lighthouses.

    • @barrieshepherd7694
      @barrieshepherd7694 Місяць тому

      @@klausstock8020 + they have moved to encrypted digital lamps now.

    • @jeremyanimatespoorly9573
      @jeremyanimatespoorly9573 Місяць тому +6

      @@klausstock8020 See now that makes sense because of the UK's notoriously rain weather. You wouldn't want your lighthouse exposed to water for long periods of time.

  • @sparkybluefox
    @sparkybluefox Місяць тому +3

    As an ex: RF engineer, you Sir are my New fun GO TO guy to enjoy Accurate RF / TV reviews !
    Great Video
    BRAVO !
    sbf

  • @robertarnobit5357
    @robertarnobit5357 22 дні тому +2

    I never believed the antenna claims on any advertisements and ESPN, HBO etc. are paid subscriptions. I feel with people who fall for this crap. Good info, thank you 👍

  • @Thetasigmaalpha
    @Thetasigmaalpha Місяць тому +188

    I miss the day when if you miss advertised something on tv the advertising authority could prosecute you.

    • @DGTelevsionNetwork
      @DGTelevsionNetwork Місяць тому

      The SEC is too busy trying to figure out how much stationary can one insert in own rectum. Very important business

    • @katsudon2048
      @katsudon2048 Місяць тому +3

      spelling pls??

    • @Stealth86651
      @Stealth86651 Місяць тому

      Unfortunately after decades of companies directly writing their own legislation via "lobbying" or bribes, consumer protections and rights have been pretty eroded. Sadly votes get butts into seats, but money still decides what they do with that power.

    • @jamesdinius7769
      @jamesdinius7769 Місяць тому +35

      I mean, they still can. False advertising is still illegal. The problem is they're so overwhelmed with how the Internet let these scams explode that only the highest priority cases(usually those posing a health risk or for much higher dollar amounts) get any attention.

    • @MidlifeRenaissanceMan
      @MidlifeRenaissanceMan Місяць тому +2

      It still applies, just not to companies like Amazon.

  • @tgheretford
    @tgheretford Місяць тому +34

    Reminded me of the time I picked up a FM radio station from Finland in the UK on a pocket radio about 2,000km away (1,200 miles) a few years ago. But that happened under specific and rare atmospheric conditions. The same conditions that allowed the only surviving recording of the BBC's 405-line television broadcast prior to World War II in the United States.

    • @derekday4832
      @derekday4832 Місяць тому +4

      When I was about 11 I took an old cassette recorder apart, touched something on the pcb, and could hear Radio Moscow from the speaker.

    • @fungo6631
      @fungo6631 Місяць тому +3

      It wasn't the same. BBC was received via F2 skip and Perkelestani radio in your area was received via E Skip.
      Note that in some areas you can still receive TV via F2. Last year some Japanese guy received TV from the Philippines without even a yagi antenna, but using an omnidirectional antenna.

    • @miniskunk
      @miniskunk Місяць тому +2

      You should have scanned the VHF band when that happened. You might have gotten a TV station since FM sits in the middle of that.

    • @marvenlunn6086
      @marvenlunn6086 15 днів тому

      Use to receive UHF TV stations for about 4 months a year don't anymore I think they all went digital

  • @AntennasDirect
    @AntennasDirect Місяць тому

    This is what the world needs to see! We love your video. ♥ Thank you for doing the research to shine a light on scammers with false claims on Amazon marketplace. It has been a frustration point of ours for many years now. It's unimaginable that Amazon would allow this type unethical behavior, but they do. Keep up the great work!

  • @MatthewJamesMullin
    @MatthewJamesMullin Місяць тому +4

    Since it's a "known haunted" hotel maybe ghost hunters were in a nearby room with all their "ghost detecting" equipment. I wouldn't be surprised their gear just throws out random elector-magnetic interference.

  • @kevinking8603
    @kevinking8603 Місяць тому +25

    Ppl are turning to antennas for access to local channels while relying on streaming services for the bulk of their TV service.

    • @integr8er66
      @integr8er66 Місяць тому +1

      No, the bulk of my viewing is antenna TV, I only stream a movie every once in a while. Steaming is actually a pain in the ass because there is just too much content and thus you can't just channel surf, and too much of it is crap. Also too much of it requires a subscription and user name and password, plus streaming tracks everything you watch

    • @TRUMP_WAS_RIGHT_ABOUT_EVRYTHNG
      @TRUMP_WAS_RIGHT_ABOUT_EVRYTHNG Місяць тому

      Anyone with smart tv they also have access to thousands of channels via whichever tv brand they bought. We have a Samsung and there's at least 1000 channels we never watch 😂 it does have local and non local channels .

    • @TRUMP_WAS_RIGHT_ABOUT_EVRYTHNG
      @TRUMP_WAS_RIGHT_ABOUT_EVRYTHNG Місяць тому

      While these are bs antennas , I don't get how people get scammed? Shit don't work you return it, easy peasy. Especially if the claims are absurd as 800 miles 😂. I've returned so much crap to Amazon over the last 10 years. I never have an issue. I feel like the scammers would lose money by having to take back all the bunk products or refunding would kill them.

    • @jerk_store
      @jerk_store Місяць тому

      With streaming services cracking down on account sharing, the number of people stream are actually going down. A lot of those people weren't even paying for the service to begin with and never will. They will find another way to get their content for free and forget about it all together.

    • @DavidNewmanDr
      @DavidNewmanDr 27 днів тому

      In the UK you can get a lot of channels over the air, thanks to Freeview. We use the Internet for subscription channels.

  • @Mayurpaj
    @Mayurpaj Місяць тому +53

    As per IMDb stats: at present there are 676,123 movies.
    So their claim of 500,000+ seems difficult to accomplish by watching over the air.

    • @oldbatwit5102
      @oldbatwit5102 Місяць тому +16

      I've seen them all anyway.

    • @dx1450
      @dx1450 Місяць тому +11

      500,000+ movies but it's the same Smokey & the Bandit 3 rerun over and over...

    • @kameljoe21
      @kameljoe21 Місяць тому

      @@dx1450 I have seen over 30k movies and a lot more TV shows. Yet Netflix wants me to watch stuff over again...

    • @retrogiftsuk4812
      @retrogiftsuk4812 Місяць тому +7

      If you were lucky enough to be able to receive 10 channels showing films at any 1 time (24 hours a day) it would take over 11 years for 500,000 films to be broadcast... Assuming they don't repeat any film... Ever...

    • @Devious_Reviews
      @Devious_Reviews Місяць тому

      @@retrogiftsuk4812 That's rather tough considering there's a usual list of repeats every and all year relevant to the time, season, and holiday. Before a sequel hits theaters, the prequels must cycle some channels, too. Then there are stations which can't help but put the entire _Harry Potter_ series on rotation 3 times a year like a marathon. Just because Warner Brothers hasn't been able to raise the bar after those wrapped up.

  • @erikguzik8204
    @erikguzik8204 Місяць тому +1

    Awesome video... plus your explanation of getting tv signals to travel farther is the best. Actually happed many years ago, back in the mid 1970's. We had a cabin in southern Ohio, and a B&W TV with a homemade antenna on the roof. My dad would go out an move it so we could see some channels. Saturday morning cartoons were on, the weather outside was very odd and some kind of storm was kicking up. We lost the station and dad went out to move the antenna. then Wow got a great picture. As we watched the shows were not from Columbus like we normally picked up. watched some shows then the Station ID came on, The channel was from West Palm Beach Florida! its lasted about an hour and then gone.

  • @seand67
    @seand67 20 днів тому

    Thanks for the warning!!

  • @Crimson_Hawk_01
    @Crimson_Hawk_01 Місяць тому +20

    The biggest issue I see is the bias you used. I saw no lighthouses anywhere.

  • @jrkern
    @jrkern Місяць тому +81

    Ken casually telling off flat-earthers 😂

    • @11000038
      @11000038 Місяць тому +7

      The earth is not flat? There isn't a jesus? We've just been bull shitted all our livesn

    • @Philflash
      @Philflash Місяць тому

      I will use this argument to see how they respond.

    • @christo930
      @christo930 Місяць тому

      The Earth is functionally flat for most people most of the time. I have not seen a horizon in years. I live in a crowded city where there is never more than 1/4 mile of unblocked views. I live about 60 miles from the Atlantic Ocean and that is probably the closest spot for getting a view of the horizon unless you go up in a skyscraper.

    • @christo930
      @christo930 Місяць тому

      @@11000038 WHY do people act as if it is self-evident? it's not. Unless your work puts you in regular contact with the shape of the Earth or if you live on a beach or something, it looks flat to people. It is functionally flat for most people, most of the time.
      I would never say it is geometrically flat. I believe it is round. But it is not obviously round.

    • @JosephPercel
      @JosephPercel Місяць тому

      @@christo930 If you ever jump out of a plane (with a parachute) at 10,000 feet, you can tell the Earth is curved.

  • @JAMES-KB7TBT
    @JAMES-KB7TBT Місяць тому +1

    During the OTA Analog to Digital switch the marketing for "Digital Antenna Requirement" was insane. I have had so many lively conversations about how a hunk of metal can not differentiate between modes.

  • @dak434
    @dak434 Місяць тому

    Your video transition's have gotten better, always glad to see your channel growing

  • @ColoRadio6996
    @ColoRadio6996 Місяць тому +46

    Tyler, the Antenna Man has done a lot of these scams on his channel. Good job. Stay safe.

    • @AntennaMan
      @AntennaMan Місяць тому +16

      Indeed I have. Thanks for the mention!

    • @carlcamp2979
      @carlcamp2979 Місяць тому +4

      AND Tyler is the REAL Deal, he helped me out here in California where I'm 90 miles between the two closest Broadcast areas. Set me up with a Good Antenna that gets the signals most of the time and a good installer that knows how to align a very directional antenna that you need for the extreme range issues I have. Thanks Tyler! And yes I first got a Scamtenna from Wallyworld before I found Tyler

    • @craftsman123456
      @craftsman123456 Місяць тому +1

      Helped me too. With his advice I was able to replace my old rooftop with a modern one that he recommended.

  • @dyter424
    @dyter424 Місяць тому +66

    Scamtenna 1 is probably UHF only; WTVK broadcasts on VHF channel 10, which of course needs a VHF antenna to be received properly. CBS in Chicago is also on that band.
    Also, there is no such thing as an "HD/4K/8K antenna": radio waves are radio waves, and even an old rusty antenna from the 70s can be used to receive digital HDTV just fine, if the signal comes in strong enough of course.

    • @Veeger
      @Veeger Місяць тому +9

      I'm surprised DIGITAL wasn't there somewhere..

    • @dx1450
      @dx1450 Місяць тому +8

      Yes, the size of that tiny thing suggested to me that it was only good for UHF channels. I have that same issue with one of my TV antennas, it's made for UHF and sometimes I have trouble picking up VHF channels.

    • @mikeslattery7371
      @mikeslattery7371 Місяць тому +7

      But the salesman said it was made with unobtanium and had perfect signals!

    • @dannydaw59
      @dannydaw59 Місяць тому +3

      I thought uhf signals were handed over to mobile phone companies. That's the whole reason why TV signals went to digital years ago.

    • @ve3snw
      @ve3snw Місяць тому +3

      and there is no such thing as a "digital" antenna

  • @adamclark9552
    @adamclark9552 Місяць тому +1

    Just before the digital switch off I lived in a 70 ft trailer. TV signals where next to zero.
    I bought a Wineguard 8200u which sat at 14 ft long.
    I picked up channels a long long way away in a mountainous region.
    But it's still funny seeing a 14 foot antenna on a 70 ft trailer.
    Tornado destroyed it last month.

  • @d2sfavs
    @d2sfavs Місяць тому

    that was fun to watch thanks for taking the time to make this video.i still watch antenna TV sometimes and my antenna is about 40 feet in the air because of hills between us.

  • @SamTheBattleshipp
    @SamTheBattleshipp Місяць тому +22

    Growing up, aluminium foil could help with the signal sometimes. Or just holding the antenna also sometimes helped. If you need more range, those outdoor antenna that attach to the roof/chiminey would be better (if you are able to install them.)

    • @robertsmith2956
      @robertsmith2956 Місяць тому +1

      I found that strange bodies mess up reception. I can remember holding the antenna to IMPROVE reception.

    • @jerelull9629
      @jerelull9629 Місяць тому +1

      I still have one of those outdoor antennas on the roof. Haven't used it in about 50 years

    • @robertsmith2956
      @robertsmith2956 Місяць тому

      @@jerelull9629 Should have some nice aged green copper now.

  • @harrkev
    @harrkev Місяць тому +35

    Those antennas work! I once got one, hooked it up, and accidentally dropped it face down on the ground. I started picking up a TV show from Australia! Not too impressive until you realize that I live in America.

    • @PC4USE1
      @PC4USE1 Місяць тому +2

      There ya go,proof of the 360 degree claim.

    • @lastotallyawesomebleach204
      @lastotallyawesomebleach204 Місяць тому

      Proof or you're lying.

    • @barrieshepherd7694
      @barrieshepherd7694 Місяць тому +3

      How did you know the difference? Aus TV is mostly American! Oh I know it was the ads - they shout at you even more than the American ads 🤣🤣

    • @Soccera0
      @Soccera0 Місяць тому +1

      I'm pretty sure that would actually be possible as both the US and Australia have antarctic claims, so you could probably pick up Australian channels if you were on the border and vice versa

    • @robertsmith2956
      @robertsmith2956 Місяць тому +4

      yea, but the channels all went in the other direction when you changed them. And the TV remote was always on the wrong side of the couch.

  • @Steve_K2
    @Steve_K2 Місяць тому +1

    I'm an old Signal Corps tech, so I enjoyed this a lot. Our downstairs antenna is one of those $10 12" square plasticy sheets that works amazingly well, with no need to be placed on a window. Our upstairs antenna is rabbit ears and a small external amplifier. Both upstairs and downstairs pull in the local ABC, CBS, NBC, PBS and Fox stations. By the way, there's no such thing as a "digital antenna." An antenna is an antenna is an antenna. In my experience, which includes rooftop antennas, 50 miles is about the limit for a usable signal for most antennas. OTA rocks, though. A good OTA picture is excellent.

  • @happyatheists9361
    @happyatheists9361 Місяць тому +1

    This series is awesome ❤

  • @antonioadkins5104
    @antonioadkins5104 Місяць тому +71

    That big square one looks like an unofficial PS6 😂

    • @JRthepyroguy
      @JRthepyroguy Місяць тому +2

      I was thinking the same thing. 😅

    • @Dick_Valparaiso
      @Dick_Valparaiso Місяць тому

      It looked like a giant WD external hdd to me. From the size it ought to hold 𝙪𝙥 𝙩𝙤 20 𝙥𝙚𝙩𝙖𝙗𝙮𝙩𝙚𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙮𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙛𝙖𝙫𝙤𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙚 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙜𝙧𝙖𝙢𝙢𝙞𝙣𝙜 (§Δ/Π)**.

    • @SuperCosmicMutantSquid
      @SuperCosmicMutantSquid Місяць тому

      I was thinking that too.
      "...wait, is that a PlayStation shell?"

    • @AwesomeStarbust7
      @AwesomeStarbust7 Місяць тому

      ​@@SuperCosmicMutantSquid frr

    • @larryjohns8823
      @larryjohns8823 Місяць тому

      They had more cases that systems, so what can we do with the extras?

  • @TheLordOfNothing
    @TheLordOfNothing Місяць тому +18

    Thank you, Ken!
    Antenna Man is a great channel for this kind of stuff. I watch the majority of TV on an antenna because I rarely watch TV as it is so my wife is the one paying for the streaming services that she uses. I got an antenna mounted to the chimney.
    Also for those who don't know--half of those advertised channels are CABLE or SATELLITE channels only that do not broadcast over the air.

    • @robertsmith2956
      @robertsmith2956 Місяць тому

      Maybe they have a pirate station broadcasting the pay channels.

  • @pierrelecaillou6966
    @pierrelecaillou6966 Місяць тому

    Well, and it's most enjoyable this presention mate! Thanks.

  • @rob9990
    @rob9990 Місяць тому

    We cut the cable cord well over a decade ago. We use a ChannelMaster outdoor antenna mounted in our attic and a low power pre-amp. No problems receiving the local stations about 30 miles away.

  • @Phil-Sands
    @Phil-Sands Місяць тому +14

    An aerial (antenna to you Americans) is not digital or whatever you want to call it, it picks up radio waves, that radio wave can be analogue or digital. I spent 40 years fitting aerials and later, satellite dishes, I used to have people phoning asking for a digital aerial because it would get them more channels. Sorry folks, TV signals are line of sight, if the aerial is of a suitable gain for the transmitter and has line of sight to the transmitter then it will work. Claims of being HD ready, 4K or higher is nonsense, if the signal is 4K or whatever it will receive it if within its design range no matter what aerial is used.

    • @aljaberhk
      @aljaberhk Місяць тому

      im not from america but i got to be honest ive never heard of it being called an aerial😊m

  • @melsbacksfriend
    @melsbacksfriend Місяць тому +32

    You're one of two tech youtubers I know (besides myself) who lives in the Chicagoland area. The other is Technology Connections.

    • @anonUK
      @anonUK Місяць тому +4

      My nearest tech youtuber is Techmoan.

    • @nabbit-hates-u-all67
      @nabbit-hates-u-all67 Місяць тому +2

      I'm from the Chicagoland area too

    • @Penoatle
      @Penoatle Місяць тому +1

      TechCon is so awesome.
      King of Earthtones!

    • @TheLordOfNothing
      @TheLordOfNothing Місяць тому +2

      I know of very few UA-camrs in my area (Atlanta)
      I bet there'll be more once more people move down here.

    • @Yeen125
      @Yeen125 Місяць тому +1

      @@PenoatleIIRC he actually lives up in Wisconsin.

  • @richaradrobertson
    @richaradrobertson Місяць тому

    Love watching your UA-cam videos about tech scams

  • @BadToadTTV
    @BadToadTTV Місяць тому

    I'm like 1min 30 secs in, and I'm already laughing hysterically because of the lighthouse antenna. Thank you 😂❤

  • @georgeyreynolds
    @georgeyreynolds Місяць тому +16

    There is no such thing as a 4k or 8k antenna. The picture (resolution) is determined by the TV and tuner and to an extent the HDMI cable compatibility.
    If the antenna supported HF then those ranges could be possible! They're getting confused between VHF and UHF and HF, possibly intentionally.

    • @MarionStevensJr
      @MarionStevensJr Місяць тому +3

      Yeah, I love how all the antennas advertised today, at least the scammy ones, will throw in terms like "digital antenna" or "HD antenna." Antennas don't care about whether a signal is analog or digital, and they don't care about SD or HD. The only thing that matters is what frequency range they're designed to receive. In fact, the best antenna I ever worked with to get digital broadcasts was an old directional outdoor antenna installed on a 25' pole back in the early 1990s. That thing could get stations 100 miles away without the digital signal breaking up. It was a beast, but it was also very expensive to install, and the terrain was extremely flat.
      And, speaking of resolution, there's no station broadcasting 8K, and only the ATSC 3.0 stations, along with a few ATSC 1.0 stations playing with newer codecs, are doing 4K.

    • @liam3284
      @liam3284 Місяць тому +1

      does ATSC even have enough bandwidth to fit an 8k picture?

  • @ResoluteMujigae
    @ResoluteMujigae Місяць тому +30

    I like that eclipse multicoloured wallpaper on the old iMac in the background!

    • @budgerigarer
      @budgerigarer Місяць тому +3

      Its from his wallpaper collection, he makes alot of nice wallpapers like that and puts them in a wallpaper collection you can find in the description.

    • @jerelull9629
      @jerelull9629 Місяць тому

      LOVE seeing the old Mac. My Bondi-blue one went to the local school district years ago.

    • @budgerigarer
      @budgerigarer Місяць тому

      @@jerelull9629 I thought it would be the other way around, you buying an old iMac they used in the 90's from a school? I'm curious what a school would do with one now?

  • @CompleteAnimation
    @CompleteAnimation Місяць тому

    This was fascinating to watch, since I haven't used over-the-air TV or even cable in well over a decade.

  • @p.dubyah5012
    @p.dubyah5012 26 днів тому +2

    Why are bullshit products even allowed to lie and sell their products? If the resellers were held responsible for these ridiculous claims , they wouldn't be sold.

  • @kensmith5694
    @kensmith5694 Місяць тому +27

    BTW: For something like $10 at a thrift store, you can get a set of rabbit ears like folks used in the 1970s. They work better than most of the indoor antennas being sold.
    An antenna is just a bit of metal that you stick up in the air to catch some radio waves. If it is the right size for the band it doesn't matter if it is digital or analog, the antenna will work fine.

    • @travis1240
      @travis1240 Місяць тому +4

      Point taken - but make sure that this antenna has a bowtie or other UHF element(s). Most channels are UHF these days, and some of the really old "rabbit ears" antenna designs are VHF only.

    • @kensmith5694
      @kensmith5694 Місяць тому +4

      @@travis1240 Even on old rabbit ears, the UHF comes in. They didn't intend it but the arms can be adjusted to make it work.

    • @fungo6631
      @fungo6631 Місяць тому

      For 10 burger shekels you can get a log periodic UHF antenna that will likely work even better.

    • @kensmith5694
      @kensmith5694 Місяць тому

      @@fungo6631 You really need one that does high VHF at least also. At lot of markets have VHF stations.

    • @fungo6631
      @fungo6631 Місяць тому

      @@kensmith5694 You can get VHF/UHF log periodics as well, and they're VERY common here in Europe. It also helps here that they can be used for DAB+ if DTV doesn't use VHF.

  • @madeintexas3d442
    @madeintexas3d442 Місяць тому +12

    I recently discovered the antenna man while helping my parents find an antenna.

  • @Kristinapedia
    @Kristinapedia Місяць тому

    LOVE THIS VIDEO!! Do you have a video on the digital tv transition in 2009 and all the antenna scams? I'm looking now but haven't seen one yet. Thanks!

  • @Devo_gx
    @Devo_gx Місяць тому +2

    Right from the get-go I was hoping you'd bring up tropospheric ducting and thankfully you did.

  • @shmehfleh3115
    @shmehfleh3115 Місяць тому +16

    FWIW, There are a few a cases where radio waves will follow the curvature of the Earth and be detected hundred or thousands of miles away. One is called sky wave propagation, which is when radio waves reflect off the ionosphere. This is how shortwave radios can pick up stations on another continent using just the built-in whip antenna. Sky wave propagation doesn't normally work with frequencies above about 30 MHz, but there are times when the ionosphere undergoes changes that allow much higher frequencies to skip off it, even VHF. I have some personal experience with this: Back in the analog days, I once managed to pick up a television station in Colorado that was broadcasting out of San Francisco. It was actually powerful enough to clobber the relatively local TV station broadcasting on the same channel.
    Another method is ground wave propagation, and it means exactly that. Certain low radio frequencies travel parallel to the surface of the Earth rather than in a straight line, and can be reliably received hundreds or thousands of miles away. Over-the-horizon radar uses ground wave propagation to work. Unfortunately, it's also limited to lower frequencies, well below what OTA television uses.

    • @ottopartz1
      @ottopartz1 Місяць тому +2

      Russian OTH radar like the kontainer 29b6 use ionosphere bouncing to work. The units have a big 400 mile dead zone directly in front of them due to this and I would assume that they also have issues during the daylight when the ionosphere doesn't reflect as well.
      I believe that the US Navy units use ionospheric reflection as well based on the layout pictures I've seen of the mobile unit deployed.

    • @pmc_
      @pmc_ Місяць тому +9

      My understanding is that VHF DX is usually from tropospheric ducting, rather than bouncing off the ionosphere

    • @ve3snw
      @ve3snw Місяць тому +2

      @@pmc_ yes

    • @StringerNews1
      @StringerNews1 Місяць тому +1

      No, ground waves are the only ones that follow the earth's surface. A skywave travels line of sight. Radio waves don't actually travel in straight lines, that's an oversimplification of a complex pattern. Ionospheric skip is a thing, but does not follow the curvature of earth's surface, it reflects off the ionosphere and sometimes earth's surface only at specific points.

    • @chipweather
      @chipweather Місяць тому

      Yeah its sick. I do ham radio and talk to people all over the world on hf.

  • @user-ef3ql6hr7d
    @user-ef3ql6hr7d Місяць тому +30

    love how you say scamtennas so casually

    • @30IYouTube
      @30IYouTube Місяць тому +2

      Great username there.

    • @BoxOfToasters
      @BoxOfToasters Місяць тому

      ​​@@30IUA-camMaybe they're an employee of BZOXAUY

    • @BoxOfToasters
      @BoxOfToasters Місяць тому

      ​@@30IUA-camMaybe they're an employee of Bzoxauy.

  • @jaytech4525
    @jaytech4525 22 дні тому

    Thank you for this content this is so up my ally! I try and tell people at work about my antennas they don’t get it 🤣

  • @night-x6793
    @night-x6793 10 днів тому +2

    I still miss the analog signals which actually work about 75% of the time even in bad weather.

  • @LatitudeSky
    @LatitudeSky Місяць тому +10

    Thanks for covering troposphere ducting. Such an occurrence provided the longest range TV signal I ever received, back in the analog days. 1800km or 1100 miles. There was a thunderstorm over the transmitter and it bounced signal at me. It lasted for about a minute and was only good for a curiosity. Nobody could have sat down to enjoy a show that way.

    • @aleksazunjic9672
      @aleksazunjic9672 Місяць тому

      You actually could, with proper filters, amplifiers and even analog computers to reconstruct the signal. In 1970s and 80s USSR and US were monitoring each other domestic radio and TV programs for possible hidden messages . Of course, you could do that from embassies, but it would take days for a tape to be received in diplomatic mail. Thus, they had specialized listening stations .

    • @stefanengler772
      @stefanengler772 Місяць тому +1

      Why you do not send in a listening report. Even haarp and NASA for Voyager 1 confimed all listening reports.

    • @fungo6631
      @fungo6631 Місяць тому

      ​@@aleksazunjic9672Yeah, that's a bit of a stretch. You mainly needed a strong antenna.

    • @aleksazunjic9672
      @aleksazunjic9672 Місяць тому

      @@fungo6631 You need filters to remove interference, amplifiers because signal would be weak and they did use analog computers to reconstruct part of the signal.

  • @usaverageguy
    @usaverageguy Місяць тому +12

    I was thinking the toothbrush ad was another example of a scam while watching it. I was surprised when it became obvious you were being serious. Really??? The tooth brush is beautiful!??

    • @vlc-cosplayer
      @vlc-cosplayer Місяць тому +2

      You gotta sell your dignity and do the ad reads if you want to get sponsorships 💀

    • @jerelull9629
      @jerelull9629 Місяць тому

      That toothbrush ad was one of the less-persuasive ones, but I just HAD to watch it like a slow-motion crash would have claimed my attention. Yes, I AM a little ADHD.

  • @unclemarksdiyauto
    @unclemarksdiyauto Місяць тому

    Thanks for a great topic and video! I think another reason these are probably popular maybe the offer (greed on our part) of getting channels for free (when we otherwise might have to pay for them. New subscriber!

  • @johnno4127
    @johnno4127 Місяць тому

    I live in the middle of nowhere, at least 50 miles from any TV station antennas. Stores still carry regular in-home antennas even though the only broadcast TV we can get comes through huge home antennas.

  • @EverettVinzant
    @EverettVinzant Місяць тому +14

    I live only a thousand miles from where you did your testing and your video showed up just fine through UA-cam. Obviously this proves the world is flat ;)

  • @GaYcOrn775
    @GaYcOrn775 Місяць тому +4

    Ken is back with another good video,as always.

  • @thedonbarakcorleoneshow6663
    @thedonbarakcorleoneshow6663 Місяць тому

    Dude I just love your videos. You need to give us more and more 😂

  • @sluggodna
    @sluggodna Місяць тому +1

    I had a $20 Amazon antenna. I found one place on the wall that received half the channels. and another, by the window for the other half. I had to scan each time I moved it, but it beat having a 120 dollar a month cable bill.😊

  • @derpyliciousmiku
    @derpyliciousmiku Місяць тому +3

    So excited to see a new computer clan video!

  • @yujiboo89
    @yujiboo89 Місяць тому +4

    The scam company names are gibberish because it's easier to get a trademark in the US if theres no other companies with the same/similar names. Specifically, it is a problem on amazon because you're required to have a trademark in order to list online.

  • @jstephens2758
    @jstephens2758 18 днів тому

    When I was frustrated with the several indoor antennas I had tried and returned, I called a local TV station and asked the Chief Engineer if he had a suggestion. As it turned out, he had tried quite a few at home also and had a recommendation, based upon experience. I bought one and while it is not perfect, it is much better than anything I had tried previously. I dumped cable years ago when the company started having twice a year price increases. It was a great move. There are over 40 digital channels available locally and this antenna brings in 28 regularly and clearly. The others are mostly shopping channels and other junk. I wonder if the shopping channels are selling scam antennas?

  • @macbuff81
    @macbuff81 21 день тому

    The light "fixtures" in that hotel's hallways are amazing :)

  • @monad_tcp
    @monad_tcp Місяць тому +4

    12:34 just waited for the ghost to go away, classic

  • @Torch70
    @Torch70 Місяць тому +4

    WYIN in Crown Point Indiana is about 10 miles south of me. I pick up all of Chicago (60 miles), all South Bend (75 miles) and even Fox 59 out of Indianapolis (135 miles). I use an old school Winegard corner reflector on my roof with a remote rotator. Endless channels, but lots junk like HSN.
    For some real fun, set up a 1 meter ku dish with a rotator and start blind scanning satellites. Inexpensive to get into and crazy stuff out there, especially the live feeds.

  • @dogbots159
    @dogbots159 Місяць тому +1

    The compass issue is a bug. When you switch the use true north setting, you need to reboot your phone twice. I had the same issue when aiming my satellite dish. Suddenly did a 180 and then started to randomly wander while stationary.

  • @armandtjviljoen
    @armandtjviljoen Місяць тому

    BRO!! You made my entire year...to date!
    Firstly, Scams and Social naughtyness is rife where I currently am and what's so sad is that people will see those basic grammatical errors and STILL order the pure plastic yuckyness online. Your insight and educating those questioning the validity of these type of things.
    You are a gentleman and a scholar, sir.
    Secondly, your approach and humor solidifies it. I sure do appreciate some wit in this day and age....and I would like to mention that I left my staff to their own and just could not face anyone after howling without realising it: "Someone had fun with an AfterEffects template!"...BTW...That hotel 'tis indeed haunted.
    Keep up the great content and wish you the utmost best!!

  • @ScarabChris
    @ScarabChris Місяць тому

    Those white omnidirectional (round) ones are for boats and RV's. I'm a boater and I have one of those round ones. They work if your boat is sitting still. But they will only grab local over air stations and the antennas built by reputable marine brands like Shalespeare will tell you the correct range under ideal conditions. But nobody uses them much anymore, now with mobile hot spots we just stream TV and music in the boat. The antenna might get you a little more range but not by much. In most cases here in South Florida if you're out on your boat and can see land you can get cell signal on your phone and wifi hot spot. Plus the hot spot streaming will work if your are moving, the antenna will be super choppy.

  • @veganguy74
    @veganguy74 Місяць тому +3

    My house has a Winegard TV antenna in the attic that is probably 30-40 years old and it works just great with local digital TV channels. I actually do use it to watch TV now and then.

  • @googaagoogaa12345678
    @googaagoogaa12345678 Місяць тому +3

    That thing with the compasses reminded me of when my phone an s22 goes to what I call spinny mode when I'm using GPS or DoorDash.

  • @MsCellobass
    @MsCellobass 16 днів тому

    😂😂😂😂 im glad i got you on my yt feed! You are hilarious!!

  • @toLothair2
    @toLothair2 29 днів тому

    I live in NYC and use a coax cable with an old pair of 300 ohm rabbit ears adapted on the end and I get over 40 channels at 1080p. The channels are very easy to find by having the TV scan for all channels automatically. After that you can manually setup your channels.

  • @lockout5731
    @lockout5731 Місяць тому +9

    a good scam bust we need more scam busting episodes

  • @ndc5544p
    @ndc5544p Місяць тому +6

    On the subject of impossible. Years ago I once set my car's radio to AM low band and received a radio station from 600 miles away. I didn't expect a measly car radio to pick that up, but it did! The quality was bad, you could understand what they were saying but just barely. Maybe that the whole cable length acted as an antenna or somehow something helped it pick that signal up, but nonetheless I was impressed.

    • @bluedistortions
      @bluedistortions Місяць тому +2

      Am bands carry less data (hence the low quality mono), but over longer ranges.
      High frequency channels, like the new 5G shit, push a lot of data, but over very short ranges.

    • @pineappleroad
      @pineappleroad Місяць тому +1

      Someone else in the comments said about someone having managed to pick up an analog TV signal from 1000 miles away

    • @InfernosReaper
      @InfernosReaper Місяць тому +2

      Likely, it was a fluke of the weather, which the video does a good job explaining

    • @nooneinpart
      @nooneinpart Місяць тому +1

      @@bluedistortions AM stations can actually sound pretty good if the station is broadcasting at the full 10kHz bandwidth and your tuner has a wide tuning bandwidth as well (most of them don’t, it introduces more noise for weaker stations), and at one point there was a method of broadcasting in AM Stereo that eventually lost to FM. It is, indeed, mostly due the fact that the AM frequency band is very low that it can travel very far. It would sound even better if they broadcasted in FM mode on the lower frequencies (more resilient to interference, though the bandwidth limit would probably still apply due to lower bands being more cramped), but the bands have already been allotted and there’s nothing anyone can do.

    • @joshuarosen465
      @joshuarosen465 Місяць тому +3

      AM operates at very low frequencies. The ionosphere reflects AM signals so the earth and the ionosphere form a waveguide that can propagate AM signals for very long distances, at night you can pick up a powerful AM station from a thousand miles away. Shortwave can propagate around the world using this mechanism. Higher frequency signals like FM, VHF, UHF and microwave are strictly line of sight. They don't reflect off of the ionosphere, they just travel out into space. The curvature of the earth is the limit. The height of the antenna determines how far the signal will reach, that's why TV antennas are put on top of skyscrapers. For more range than a skyscraper you need a satellite.

  • @nexus3756
    @nexus3756 Місяць тому

    I love you ken never change lol. awesome vids.

  • @encieno1
    @encieno1 Місяць тому

    I haven't heard the term 'stories' in a long time, that was hilarious!

  • @Techtast
    @Techtast Місяць тому +15

    Yes A Tv antenna can pickup a signal 1900mi away! it's called a satellite dish

    • @AustynSN
      @AustynSN Місяць тому

      Came to say the same thing. You beat me to it.😁

    • @aleksazunjic9672
      @aleksazunjic9672 Місяць тому +1

      Antennas do not care about the range, they are interested in signal strength.

  • @DJ_Rainy
    @DJ_Rainy Місяць тому +13

    8:00 Ok I will say, It "Could" Happen if it was a analog signal, Some people have picked up analog TV from 1000 miles away, Not sure about 1800, But It wouldn't probably never happen with digital. Great video btw :)

    • @bluedistortions
      @bluedistortions Місяць тому +1

      If the current record is 1000 miles, I'm not expecting 1800 to be possible.

    • @justanotheryoutubechannel
      @justanotheryoutubechannel Місяць тому +1

      I’ve heard stories of people picking up audio radio from 2000 miles away, but I find it highly unlikely TV could be transmitted reliably over such a distance.

    • @dx1450
      @dx1450 Місяць тому +3

      I did, back in the early 2000's before TV changed to analog. I used to DX (listen to distant stations) TV station audio channels on channel 2 on my HF receiver (59.750 MHZ, IIRC) and one day I picked up a station in Virginia from my home in Kansas. I'm sure it was tropospheric ducting or sporadic E. I also picked up low band VHF (~35 MHZ) fire and ambulance dispatch comms out of Ohio. One day I was listening to one Channel 2 TV station on my vertical antenna, and when I switched to a horizontal antenna I picked up a different station. I really miss analog TV...

    • @Lostboy811
      @Lostboy811 Місяць тому

      ​@justanotheryoutubechannel I mean you can actually get a reliable connection from that distance as I have done. There's some issues to do this but as you know advertising can claim stuff as long as it is possible so that most can given perfect lab Conditions. But mine wasn't a lab, the thing is that it was a time before the internet and cell phones (there were some brick phones) so for one thing less possible interference. There was only one business broadcasting television and yes when a second competitor showed up 15 years later you had more snow broadcasting. Depending on the weather and the adjustment of the antennas and angle your position you were holding it and no just having it on a surface wouldn't work and adding a metal hanger to extend the rabbit ears also helped

    • @tz8785
      @tz8785 Місяць тому

      @@justanotheryoutubechannel Quite possible with shortwave or longwave radio, but those use different and VERY different frequencies respectively.

  • @3rdalbum
    @3rdalbum Місяць тому

    I remember when digital TV was first starting here, and antenna companies started advertising "digital antennas".
    They made heaps of money. When people bought their first digital TV it was usually to replace one that has been sitting there for 10 years. As soon as they moved the antenna cable out of the old TV and into the new, the brittle old cable would break internally and then the customer wouldn't get any signal. So then they'd call an antenna company to "buy a digital antenna" and the antenna man would also replace the antenna cable from the wall to the TV.
    I worked at a TV shop at the time and I always told my customers that their existing antenna should be able to pick up digital TV, and to just buy a new $10 cable rather than a new antenna. Saved them from getting scammed by antenna marketing.

  • @nimblehealer199
    @nimblehealer199 Місяць тому

    4:38 the digital antenna I'm currently using, the box says that it can receive over the air signals from up to 75 miles.

  • @AwokenEntertainment
    @AwokenEntertainment Місяць тому +16

    not sure what felt more scammy, the sponsor or the antennas 😅

  • @bjornroesbeke
    @bjornroesbeke Місяць тому +3

    Attach a spectrum analyzer and QAM demodulator to that antenna. It'll give more immediate feedback.

  • @RollTide24-7
    @RollTide24-7 Місяць тому

    Hey @Computerclan My uncle has a junk yard and he got a camper in for scrap. Well I ended up getting the antenna and it had a booster too. I Mounted it in a tree and hooked it up to my TV at home and I do get a LOT of channels but there is a few thats the same station just different channels. My MAX RANGE is only 55 miles! An I say that only because the CW channel I'm receiving is from Birmingham Al an thats about 55 miles from my home. Your opinion is greatly appreciated andbthank you for your time.

  • @fpvrcstuff
    @fpvrcstuff 24 дні тому

    I was going to comment " it would have been nice to see inside the covers", but you did this towards the end of the video...Great work good review.

  • @sativaburns6705
    @sativaburns6705 Місяць тому +4

    Saving boomers and zoomers from 100 year old tech... Did you need a rf splitter to screw the 2 prongs in on the back of the TV? I still remember the Bundys FOX viewing positions....

  • @DIYDaveOK
    @DIYDaveOK Місяць тому +9

    If I see "digital" in front of an antenna ad, I see scam instantly

    • @ranma182
      @ranma182 Місяць тому

      You shouldn't they are broadcasting in digital now
      Like he said it's the range ypu want to be wary of

    • @dx1450
      @dx1450 Місяць тому +1

      Me too. I remember when TV was changing from analog to digital and there were so many ads for "DTV antennas." As if you can't pick up digital TV stations on a regular old TV antenna...

    • @BatGS
      @BatGS Місяць тому +2

      True. The antenna has nothing 2 do with mode. (Analogue or Digital) Fact- The older, many still existing (however probably not intact) antennas receive better than most of the new junk. No surprise there.

    • @DIYDaveOK
      @DIYDaveOK Місяць тому

      @@ranma182 Uhm, no, antennas don't know what "digital" means...they just pick up signals. But lots of suckers pay for "digital" antennas.

  • @thenekom
    @thenekom Місяць тому +1

    We're about 40 miles from our local stations in Pittsburgh, our antennae needs an amplifier to get anything at all, and those wildfires in Canada a year or two ago messed with it severely. Yeah, you'd think they'd make more plausible false claims. Might as well claim to bring the lighthouses to your yard.

  • @dannydaw59
    @dannydaw59 Місяць тому +2

    When you see a weird name brand that has few reviews on Amazon that's a red flag. They slap a new brand name on the same product when the reviews turn bad.

  • @CrazyBossDK
    @CrazyBossDK Місяць тому +3

    Just to clear one thing, Picture quality is not affected by the Signal Quality. If there is enought signal to produce a stable picture its the same quality of the picture you see, eg. at 70% as at 100%. If the Signal quality drops to much you will get those errors in the picture.

    • @eDoc2020
      @eDoc2020 Місяць тому +1

      It should be noted that this is only true for current DTV standards. It definitely mattered with analog TV. Future DTV standards might also introduce a way to gracefully degrade.

    • @CrazyBossDK
      @CrazyBossDK 24 дні тому

      @@eDoc2020 Sure, but in my part of the world Analogue tv closed 15 years ago :)

    • @eDoc2020
      @eDoc2020 24 дні тому

      @@CrazyBossDK Since writing my last comment I have learned that ATSC 3.0 can in fact gracefully degrade. I'm not sure if the DVB standards support any scalable video coding. If not I'd guess their v3 will as well.

  • @OntarioBearHunter
    @OntarioBearHunter Місяць тому +4

    1900 miles...its for flat earthers..no pesky curvature of the earth to get in the way

  • @jceggbert5
    @jceggbert5 Місяць тому +1

    I've gotten some miscellaneous dubious antennas before and the included amplifiers always did more harm than good. I didn't notice if you mentioned using them or not, but I wonder if that's why scamtenna 1 didn't work at all?