Good game! I had a lot of fun, and made a lot of bad plays as well... The reason the analyser puts MIs(BRAND) as low on equity as it does is because it has an inbuilt metric on quantifying endgame plays based on how many tiles you are playing off and the points you're leaving on your rack. It does this so that it doesn't make as many silly and slow endgame plays that lose the game. In this case MIsBRAND was the best endgame play, but seemed counterintuitive to the analyser's automatic system of judgment.
Good game! I had a lot of fun, and made a lot of bad plays as well... The reason the analyser puts MIs(BRAND) as low on equity as it does is because it has an inbuilt metric on quantifying endgame plays based on how many tiles you are playing off and the points you're leaving on your rack. It does this so that it doesn't make as many silly and slow endgame plays that lose the game. In this case MIsBRAND was the best endgame play, but seemed counterintuitive to the analyser's automatic system of judgment.