Inside Chernobyl’s new €1.5bn structure for exploded nuclear reactor

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,1 тис.

  • @christiancamilleri5439
    @christiancamilleri5439 5 років тому +4009

    Is Dyatlov still in the toilet?

  • @d1want34
    @d1want34 5 років тому +1078

    In a 1000 years from now, archaeologists who found this structure will say, "it was a massive temple for the ancient people"

    • @dondobbs9302
      @dondobbs9302 4 роки тому +67

      SSHHHiiiii...THAT's what all those giant pyramids are around the world! "Pharo's Curse" indeed.

    • @d1want34
      @d1want34 4 роки тому +36

      @@dondobbs9302 according to the gatekeepers, every ancient structure was a religious temple

    • @irishgamer9151
      @irishgamer9151 4 роки тому +25

      @@ryans413 then they will say its cursed you can go in there lol

    • @g-man4219
      @g-man4219 4 роки тому +13

      and they’ll call that “the curse”

    • @Damocles16
      @Damocles16 4 роки тому +12

      Praise be Atom!
      (It is a temble Indeed: dedicated to the god of human foolness. )

  • @007kuntasod
    @007kuntasod 5 років тому +2248

    Chernobyl is just like Disney land
    The only difference? The 7 foot mouse is actually real.

  • @kzelmer
    @kzelmer 5 років тому +1355

    Chernobyl series has made a lot of damage to the UA-cam comment section on Chernobyl's videos...

  • @TheDoodlez1111
    @TheDoodlez1111 5 років тому +3025

    so much effort only to isolate 3.6 roentgen?

  • @MarioCro7
    @MarioCro7 5 років тому +2310

    Hmm,1.5 billion.
    Not great,not terrible.

    • @Smarglenargle
      @Smarglenargle 5 років тому +51

      thats about the price of 1 high tech submarine so its not that crazy either i guess for a national project.

    • @callumhardy5098
      @callumhardy5098 5 років тому +9

      MarioCro
      What do you mean the old one was leaky and had holes in the roof! If it fell in nuclear dust could spread in a dust cloud again!! You can put a price on cleaning something so stupid, if anything it shows how inefficient nuclear power is!

    • @walter9733
      @walter9733 5 років тому +23

      callum hardy r/woosh

    • @callumhardy5098
      @callumhardy5098 5 років тому +7

      @@walter9733
      yer i didnt get the joke!
      Not great Not Terrible

    • @callumhardy5098
      @callumhardy5098 5 років тому +2

      @@walter9733
      ive seen HBO and the memes about it

  • @milos1534
    @milos1534 5 років тому +879

    "Radiation levels inside were estimated at 20 times more than LETHAL dose"
    Not great, not terrible...

    • @derjoghurtmitderecke
      @derjoghurtmitderecke 5 років тому +1

      I see the reference to "Chernobylite".

    • @MRoh79
      @MRoh79 5 років тому

      Vnemus 34es and irregular than a Scan or a Environment

    • @jaafartahzeeb8438
      @jaafartahzeeb8438 5 років тому

      derjoghurtmitderecke m

    • @miksuko
      @miksuko 5 років тому +2

      @@derjoghurtmitderecke what reference?? He's referencing the HBO show.

    • @derjoghurtmitderecke
      @derjoghurtmitderecke 5 років тому +1

      @@miksuko Google Chernobylite.

  • @hiderunbride8431
    @hiderunbride8431 5 років тому +1129

    1.5 billion, just an equivalent of one x-ray.

    • @TheIndogamer
      @TheIndogamer 5 років тому +18

      It's only 360 thousand

    • @Cycluing
      @Cycluing 5 років тому +66

      You're delusional. Get him to the infirmary

    • @Zoltan_Gyarmathi
      @Zoltan_Gyarmathi 5 років тому +2

      chest x-ray

    • @Gabriel.P
      @Gabriel.P 5 років тому

      No, it's about 400 chest x-rays

    • @mananjoshi1289
      @mananjoshi1289 5 років тому +1

      Harold Blando lmao... 😂

  • @jithinbalachandran2150
    @jithinbalachandran2150 5 років тому +643

    That guy in front of the computer looks like the next dyatlov

  • @WisnuAji-Benjamin
    @WisnuAji-Benjamin 5 років тому +402

    "what's the cost of lies?"
    1,5 billion dollars. Not great not terrible

    • @jaellanthehat3693
      @jaellanthehat3693 4 роки тому +9

      Not only that, but many lives aswell

    • @Borex2
      @Borex2 4 роки тому +1

      And many countless lifes

    • @lamuswwodzie132
      @lamuswwodzie132 4 роки тому +5

      Actually its 1,5 billion euro, euro is worth more than dollar.

    • @Borex2
      @Borex2 4 роки тому

      @@lamuswwodzie132 Actually no, dollar is more worth Google it if you don't believe me

    • @cantthinkofnameyeah7249
      @cantthinkofnameyeah7249 4 роки тому

      You know how to rewrite a phrase that was in A TV show good job

  • @galreserve2322
    @galreserve2322 5 років тому +318

    1.Any Chernobyl video
    2.Dyatlov jokes
    3.Legasov jokes

    • @andulos8452
      @andulos8452 5 років тому +9

      4.Scherbina jokes

    • @xoniq-vr
      @xoniq-vr 5 років тому +11

      5. “3.5 roentgens” jokes

    • @chiraglunagaria4597
      @chiraglunagaria4597 5 років тому +12

      @@xoniq-vr
      6. Not Great, Not Terrible

    • @Damocles16
      @Damocles16 4 роки тому +2

      7. Dangerous and disgracefull spread of misinformation while disregarding party officials, kind of joke. (And asking "are you stupid")

    • @peaveyst7
      @peaveyst7 4 роки тому +1

      the comment section is mildly contaminated, i have seen worse...

  • @trendkill3333
    @trendkill3333 5 років тому +227

    It’s eerie to think that one of the workers in the part that blew up and collapsed is still entombed beneath the rubble

    • @bgrady24
      @bgrady24 5 років тому +39

      Any large structure built before modern times has many dead inside. Great Wall of China, even the Hoover Dam

    • @pemo2676
      @pemo2676 5 років тому +26

      @@jazzycat8917 But we actively know exactly who is in there, their stories and life. This story is more eerie by the radiation and the consequences, the fact you can't even try to excavate and honour those lives.

    • @bandolierboy1908
      @bandolierboy1908 5 років тому +21

      I think the worker that died in there was right next to the reactor when the first explosion occurred, but if that's not true, his body was probably vaporized by the second explosion

    • @pemo2676
      @pemo2676 5 років тому +10

      @@bandolierboy1908 The explosion would've been different to an atom bombs vaporisation abilities, but I have no doubt that people next to it were instantly killed and people near by in corridors and the room with all the tanks would be entombed

    • @damnsonwheredyoufindthis.3830
      @damnsonwheredyoufindthis.3830 5 років тому +9

      There could be someones skeleton under your house considering how many people have died and been burried over thousands of years.

  • @DerJohnny100
    @DerJohnny100 5 років тому +164

    The Reactor looks soo smal in this Building

  • @xayvon3788
    @xayvon3788 5 років тому +264

    *COMRADES* They are delusional take them to the infirmary

  • @TheNefastor
    @TheNefastor 4 роки тому +77

    Russie reactors are like Russian dolls : you put them into a building, then put that building into a bigger building, then continue this process forever or until you run out of planet, whichever comes first.

    • @TheNefastor
      @TheNefastor 4 роки тому +1

      @flip inheck sure, let's deflect the blame to someone else, right ? Let's forget the USSR built similar reactors everywhere else. Let's also forget their submarines have two reactors because they can't rely on just one and be sure their boats will make it home. Let's face it : when you say "high tech", Russia is never the country people think about.

    • @dagnytaggart2027
      @dagnytaggart2027 3 роки тому

      +++++

  • @ImotoriumVLOG
    @ImotoriumVLOG 5 років тому +31

    1:47 you can clearly see radiation

    • @lurezpe8655
      @lurezpe8655 4 роки тому +5

      That white noise is because of the radiation

    • @BKnight_
      @BKnight_ 4 роки тому +6

      That recording is crazy. When was it taken? It's literally looking directly above the upper biological shield.
      If it's an older video, the person who recorded it is probably dead.

    • @OllieTattersall
      @OllieTattersall 4 роки тому +2

      Gamma particles I believe. Intense stuff.

  • @donaldducktrump5508
    @donaldducktrump5508 5 років тому +361

    hold my graphite while I piss 3.6 roentgens before breakfast

    • @rrt_xoxo5632
      @rrt_xoxo5632 5 років тому +21

      You're delusional! It's about 15,000

    • @lekeme1773
      @lekeme1773 5 років тому +5

      @@rrt_xoxo5632 lying at time like this, such a shame

    • @rrt_xoxo5632
      @rrt_xoxo5632 5 років тому +7

      @@lekeme1773 I've been working here for the last 25 years! You're delusional, get him to the infirmary! Everybody is stupid except me!

    • @businesshobbit4944
      @businesshobbit4944 5 років тому +8

      Pissing 3.6 roentgens? Not great, not terrible.

    • @rrt_xoxo5632
      @rrt_xoxo5632 5 років тому +5

      @@businesshobbit4944 You mean 15,000! Everybody knows 15,000=3.6

  • @businesshobbit4944
    @businesshobbit4944 5 років тому +467

    You can’t see this new structure, because it’s not there!

  • @cienciabit
    @cienciabit 3 роки тому +12

    Look at time 01:48 the dots on the image are subatomic particles hitting the sensor of the camera.

    • @steve1978ger
      @steve1978ger 3 роки тому

      Yup, that's the remains of the actual core.

  • @bkarmark2602
    @bkarmark2602 5 років тому +213

    The ChNPP looks so small inside of the nsc structure

    • @badmeme486
      @badmeme486 5 років тому +11

      Well it is only reactor 4

    • @bkarmark2602
      @bkarmark2602 5 років тому +2

      Bad Meme same

    • @Lightning_Mike
      @Lightning_Mike 5 років тому +4

      Looks like a model in a museum

    • @pedroptga1
      @pedroptga1 5 років тому +3

      That's what she said...

    • @krashd
      @krashd 4 роки тому

      The NSC structure is tall enough to house the statue of liberty, standing up.

  • @tomeverall1015
    @tomeverall1015 5 років тому +58

    50,000 people used to live here, now it’s a ghost town.

    • @leonardobrambilla9760
      @leonardobrambilla9760 4 роки тому

      wwwtjecouk cap MacMillan: I’ve never seen something like that...

    • @TheOfficialCzex
      @TheOfficialCzex 4 роки тому +2

      There are regular tourist groups if that counts for anything.

    • @dtemple586
      @dtemple586 4 роки тому +2

      Take them out, or let them pass

  • @samtheman1422
    @samtheman1422 4 роки тому +46

    Its amazing how small that place looks inside the new structure. When you look at pictures of reactor 4 and the orignal containment building they built around it, it looks hudge but inside this new structure its so small. I hope they can dismantle the original building and get all that old fuel cleaned out.

    • @mycroft16
      @mycroft16 Рік тому

      That's gonna take a while. A while with a number of zeros after it.

  • @jmdudley3859
    @jmdudley3859 5 років тому +71

    That new structure is so impressive that it is hard to believe that you could do something like that ! Nice job 👍

  • @MrMrRubic
    @MrMrRubic 4 роки тому +28

    Structure: *is designed to keep radiation inside*
    Person: "hey let's go INSIDE!"

    • @haliax8149
      @haliax8149 4 роки тому +3

      Yep, must look funny to people who don't understand nuclear. Or maybe you'll get smart and realize they're not really taking a risk.

    • @MrMrRubic
      @MrMrRubic 4 роки тому +2

      Do you hear that? It's the sound of the joke flying over your head.

  • @H_Malik_RL
    @H_Malik_RL 5 років тому +219

    So In 100 years are they just gonna slap another one on top?

    • @TechCentralOfficial
      @TechCentralOfficial 5 років тому +5

      😂

    • @ethanedwards422
      @ethanedwards422 5 років тому +24

      Theres robotics inside that will be able to pull out radioactive parts. They will be sorted into storage a and disposed of. After 100 years, hopefully it'll be nice and clean. Getting rid of the fuel and materials that's dried up and is lodged in is a different story all together.

    • @maximumnoise78
      @maximumnoise78 5 років тому +9

      This will go on for the next 20,000 years im guessing...

    • @mygaminghands9875
      @mygaminghands9875 5 років тому +18

      Keep going like a Matryoshka doll lmao and cover the earth lol

    • @HyenaBlank
      @HyenaBlank 5 років тому +10

      The general idea is to slowly take the old structure apart bit by bit. then the long con of stashing the rubble away safetly for the next 10k+ years.

  • @3cc619
    @3cc619 5 років тому +138

    They are working for 800 rubels bonus and free vodka.

  • @Beamin-vt7jm
    @Beamin-vt7jm 4 роки тому +29

    Chernobyl was hands down the best mini series I have seen in years.

  • @hypercomms2001
    @hypercomms2001 5 років тому +12

    01:53 what appears to be noise in the black areas of the image are actually due to effects of gamma radiation on the camera image sensor... either a CCD, or three Vidicon tubes...

    • @gdshockedgd2351
      @gdshockedgd2351 4 роки тому

      Or it could be dark but probably the radiation

  • @lucyburbidge1068
    @lucyburbidge1068 4 роки тому +9

    Anyone else just get the chills when they watch documentaries about Chernobyl it’s really scary to me but also fascinating at the same time

  • @restedsoul42
    @restedsoul42 5 років тому +262

    So what happens after 100 years? Or is that someone else’s problem.

    • @dwayne8667
      @dwayne8667 5 років тому +145

      I suppose 100 years is a long time for something to last under the circumstances. You're right though, by then they will have a totally different, more effective way of dealing with it.

    • @sandyfung2535
      @sandyfung2535 5 років тому +78

      Prob. And this time they were right but took 130 plus years later...
      plant director Bryukhanov reports no more than 3.6 roentgen. I'm told it's the equivalent of a chest X-ray.
      Haha

    • @ManuelRF
      @ManuelRF 5 років тому +4

      Basically

    • @fryncyaryorvjink2140
      @fryncyaryorvjink2140 5 років тому +136

      Then we'll build another hanger that goes on top of that, then another, then another until we have a russian nesting doll of chernobyl... Hey, I have a great idea for the gift store...

    • @cymbala6208
      @cymbala6208 5 років тому +29

      As I've heard they have installed cranes and remotely controlled machines to remove the waste for storage in containers. But I think they have not started yet (maybe radiation levels still too high?)

  • @magmajctaz1405
    @magmajctaz1405 5 років тому +20

    Wow. Wish there were more shots. It's difficult to get a sense of the enormity of the new containment structure. A building, within a building, within a building.

    • @andrewnelson3603
      @andrewnelson3603 5 років тому

      There is a good documentary on it from PBS on Netflix.

    • @AverageJoe8686
      @AverageJoe8686 5 років тому +1

      www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/video/building-chernobyls-megatomb/

  • @AhmedOkby
    @AhmedOkby 5 років тому +18

    Nuclear material:how many times do we have to teach you this lesson old man

  • @kennooo535
    @kennooo535 5 років тому +33

    Was the project supervised by dyatlov or was he in the toilet again

  • @anitagoodsleep5330
    @anitagoodsleep5330 5 років тому +40

    Salute to the people that sacrificed with their lives....👏👏👏👏

  • @BrianD146
    @BrianD146 3 роки тому +7

    Thank you so much for this optimistic piece about nuclear power.
    I just wanted to add more about the positive effects.
    In the worst case scenarios of a massive earthquake and tidal wave with Fukushima no one died of radiation poisoning. But rather from the overreaction of the government not allowing people to return to their homes.
    A lot of people could have returned to their homes with very few mitigating factors.
    With Chernobyl, the RBMK reactors primary design was to create plutonium for nuclear weapons. Electricity was just a byproduct.
    The accident occurred because of the reckless ambitions of the lead engineer on duty. The deaths were created by the Soviet government not being upfront about the disaster.
    Just hundreds of feet away was reactor number three and then reactor number two and one. They kept running for about another 15 years.
    In both these scenarios today there is tourism including people that are walking right up to the reactor for a limited amount of time.
    Everyone knows that the news sells fear and anger. The news is part of the problem with keeping this truly green energy source from being deployed.
    There are forces that want to make nuclear power so expensive it can never be bilt. Principle among them are oil companies.
    The deaths and expense of global warming with its extreme weather is obvious and plays out everyday.
    I'm excited about generation 4 reactors. They're about six different designs and they have about six different characteristics.
    Some of the best characteristics are
    -They're considered walk away safe.
    -They burn more nuclear waste than they create.
    -The waste is considered hazardous for far less time.
    -They're non-proliferation so they can't be used for nuclear weapons.
    - The designs are small and can be as common as a hospital. They take up the footprint of about a Walmart. A truly local power grid to accompany wind and solar.
    This is truly the future that's going to power our electric cars and trucks. Some of the byproducts of nuclear power is creating hydrogen. This could power our airplanes, trains and ships.
    I look forward to clean skies without smog or inversion layers.
    I would much rather live next door to a nuclear power plant then a power plant admitting CO2 gas in other poisons and toxins.

  • @Jackobee231
    @Jackobee231 5 років тому +117

    You didn't see graphite didn't you?
    Because it wasn't there!

  • @Soundtracks161
    @Soundtracks161 5 років тому +24

    It's only a 3.6 roentgen. I'm told it's the equivalent of a chest X-ray

  • @F17A
    @F17A 4 роки тому +10

    3:04 i really thought Kim was playing minecraft

  • @mwycho3431
    @mwycho3431 5 років тому +6

    Someone explain to me please - if it’s so deadly and radioactive that they had to build a structure, why are people just chilling next to the reactor ? Am I missing something ?

    • @manuthemlg6489
      @manuthemlg6489 5 років тому +9

      Because the real dangerous radioactive stuff is inside the nuclear plant under reactor 4. The raditation has lowered since exploding and its behind the chernobyl nuclear building and the old shelter so inside the new shelter isnt that radioactive and the ppl work there only a while and get banned.

    • @bensemusx
      @bensemusx 5 років тому

      Staying in the new structure is exposing them to very low doses of radiation. They do wear masks to prevent breathing in any radioactive dust as our skin can shield us from some radiation but if it gets inside it does much more damage. If they were to go inside the old building they would be exposed to higher doses which is why protective gear is worn. There are many places inside the old structure that still have lethal levels of radiation.

    • @jarskil8862
      @jarskil8862 4 роки тому

      Problem is not the gamma radiation thats coming from the reactor. Gamma emitters are too heavy to be carried by wind. And Air is good enough radiation shield for static emitter.
      Problem is alpha and beta emitters, those can be carried around by wind (radioactive dust)
      The shield structure is for keeping that radioactive dust inside.
      Atleast this is how I understood it.

  • @pdsng69
    @pdsng69 3 роки тому +4

    0:43
    The reason this cost over €1.5 billion because they bought the $1000 stand😂

  • @carlblaskowitz7817
    @carlblaskowitz7817 5 років тому +31

    "He tells me that we will need... *ALL* the liquid nitrogen in the Soviet Union.."
    Don't forget the scale of the original problem they had to overcome, calling it the Battle is quite fitting.

    • @centralintelligenceagency9003
      @centralintelligenceagency9003 5 років тому +2

      And they were wrong, sending the miners town into Hell for nothing. The china syndrome isn't real.

    • @stormtrooper9404
      @stormtrooper9404 5 років тому +2

      Central Intelligence Agency They did’nt feared china syndrome you mongol!
      Water table is high at ChNPP and adjent Kiev reservoir supplies 20 milion+ people with drinking water.So better safe than sorry.And anyway there was no way to know how far the fuel will reach at the time of building the concrete slab.Not until 1989 when they menaged to find the fuel and access its location and state.

    • @carlblaskowitz7817
      @carlblaskowitz7817 5 років тому +3

      @@stormtrooper9404 The fuel was finally located by a group of physicists named the complex expedition. The crawled over every inch of the plant looking for fuel. The finally found most of it after taking almost a year to drill into a reinforced wall. Many of the scientists died an early death.

    • @stormtrooper9404
      @stormtrooper9404 5 років тому +2

      Carl Blaskowitz Thanks for added info!
      I have faded memory of an old russian documentary about it.
      R.I.P. liquidators

  • @manikroychowdhury9435
    @manikroychowdhury9435 5 років тому +6

    0:12 Looking like a movie set.

  • @MrJinxmaster1
    @MrJinxmaster1 4 роки тому +3

    Can't wait for them to build a giant angular shell over this in a hundred years, then another smooth one in 1000 years

  • @agentpiggles6685
    @agentpiggles6685 3 роки тому +2

    So you’re telling me at the stop where Europe almost ended 30 years ago is now inhabitable? Wtf

  • @AL_O0
    @AL_O0 5 років тому +23

    Why build a solar array? Just fire up reactor 3 again

    • @AL_O0
      @AL_O0 5 років тому +4

      ThatAussieGirl, it was supposed to be a joke,
      But even then they attempted to fix some of the flaws to prevent further disasters, still not safe by modern, but also not terrible, there are other RBMK-1000 still in operation to this day

    • @yannicg
      @yannicg 5 років тому

      @@AL_O0 where exactly?

    • @AL_O0
      @AL_O0 5 років тому

      Einfach Yannic en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/RBMK

    • @yannicg
      @yannicg 5 років тому

      @@AL_O0 ok, thx.

  • @Demicron
    @Demicron 5 років тому +23

    Its like a Bandaid over a lump of cancer.

    • @carlblaskowitz7817
      @carlblaskowitz7817 5 років тому +22

      Not true. The NSC is what will make future releases far less likely. In its previous state, if the lid fell into the vessel it would cause a massive radioactive dust storm that would introduce an entirely new generation of young Europeans to the name "Chernobyl "
      It was so bad that simply dropping a tool off your belt into the wrong area could be hazardous. They also had to install the sarcophagus onto already damaged foundations... radiation eats everything given enough time and we are fortunate to not have had a collapse before this was covered.
      Now it can be dismantled remotely in air conditioned safety and contained even if the roof falls into the pit.
      This is the beginning of the end of Chernobyl... one day there will be only museums, monuments and visitors.

    • @folbykleetwood7462
      @folbykleetwood7462 4 роки тому +2

      @@carlblaskowitz7817 I very much approve of that last line. It makes me sad that I'll never get to see Chernobyl in its prime (for lack of better words), but y'know world health

  • @werewolfpubggaming2252
    @werewolfpubggaming2252 5 років тому +4

    chernobyl:builds another nuclear reactor
    me: i don’t like where this is going

  • @danrericha346
    @danrericha346 5 років тому +6

    The radiation is still dangerous inside but, not nearly as bad as it was. You have footage of people walking right up to the corium in the basement. Underneath the sarcophagus you would get some spots at roughly 400 mS/h in 2007.

  • @toainsully
    @toainsully 5 років тому +6

    Now, we wait for the Stalkers.

  • @casacara
    @casacara 4 роки тому +2

    This feels almost like a fantasy story. The heroes cannot defeat the monster, only seal it away for long enough that the next generation can renew the seal.

  • @badatpseudoscience
    @badatpseudoscience 5 років тому +15

    That is some incredible engineering!

    • @krashd
      @krashd 4 роки тому +1

      Mammoet. The Dutch are phenomenal engineers.

    • @llbb6595
      @llbb6595 4 роки тому +2

      @@krashd 2 french company bouygue/vinci build thar structure the dutch one took care of the lift of the New safe containment.

  • @넝담크
    @넝담크 5 років тому +2

    Fukushima radiation leaks are much more serious than Chernobyl. Japan is holding an Olympic baseball game and supplying Fukushima food.

    • @Thelonelyreign
      @Thelonelyreign 5 років тому +1

      The deference is that Chernobyl was handled. Solved as best it could have.
      Fukushima was essentially pushed under the rug and forgot about.
      It costed the soviet union more than 300 million rubles.
      Japan doesn't wanna spend half that.

    • @alimaabalgansuren289
      @alimaabalgansuren289 6 місяців тому

      No chernobyl much more radiation

  • @emptysoul6743
    @emptysoul6743 5 років тому +7

    Me in 6 years: wow! It's Chernobyl! It takes here plant with sarcofagus! Pripat'! I need to come there. Me when I came to plant. Wat... Where is plant... Only confiment.. (looking around) WTF it's just a field.

  • @harpreetbhullar2433
    @harpreetbhullar2433 4 роки тому +2

    This structure looks not great not terrible I'll rate it 3.6 out of 15000

  • @pan4909
    @pan4909 5 років тому +3

    Crazy how I know what the reactor looks like and it will never be seen again from the first attempt and now this in place

  • @danfletcher3255
    @danfletcher3255 4 роки тому +2

    The original confinement (the sarcophagus) looked more like the building itself...just not painted
    But the "New safe confinement" looks like they turned that part of chernobyl into a plane hangar

  • @Teqnyq
    @Teqnyq 5 років тому +3

    *100 years later* .....
    This is what the inside of Chernobyl's new-new confinement structure looks like.

    • @chasm671
      @chasm671 5 років тому +1

      Nah, I'm sure we'll have had a nuclear war by then, or at least an even more catastrophic accident.

    • @Teqnyq
      @Teqnyq 5 років тому

      @@chasm671 In that case we'll need a planetary sarcophagus

    • @SiXiam
      @SiXiam Рік тому

      No way this one lasts 100 years. I give it 40-50 max.

    • @Teqnyq
      @Teqnyq Рік тому +1

      @@SiXiam I can't believe 4 years have gone by 😱

  • @pietjan2650
    @pietjan2650 5 років тому +26

    just build a pyramid on top of it.

    • @chilling_at_pontiff
      @chilling_at_pontiff 5 років тому +3

      The limestone would probably hold up better than the aluminum containment center

    • @fryncyaryorvjink2140
      @fryncyaryorvjink2140 5 років тому +2

      Then we can truly have pyramid power

    • @szolar23
      @szolar23 5 років тому

      hold my beer!:))

    • @scoobydoo3248
      @scoobydoo3248 5 років тому

      Limestone...not great, not terrible

  • @美優美結実優美夕みゆ
    @美優美結実優美夕みゆ 5 років тому +4

    Very cool! I remember watching a documentary on this a couple years back

  • @drjmja1984
    @drjmja1984 4 роки тому +3

    Chernobyl miniseries is a masterpiece

  • @Mcfc2Rich
    @Mcfc2Rich 5 років тому +3

    So when can I move back to my home? My camcorders been on record for 49 years and I've been seriously worried about my electric bill.

  • @jamesaiaz4011
    @jamesaiaz4011 5 років тому +2

    "so-called sarcophagus, tending the steel and cement tomb that encases 216 tons of uranium and plutonium buried within the remains of the fourth reactor block."

  • @principalityofbelka6310
    @principalityofbelka6310 5 років тому +10

    There's Graphite on the ground

    • @kroneexe
      @kroneexe 5 років тому +8

      You didn't see graphite.
      YOU DIDN'T, BECAUSE IT'S NOT THERE!

    • @principalityofbelka6310
      @principalityofbelka6310 5 років тому +3

      @@kroneexe I apologize *vomits*

    • @BarkaDog
      @BarkaDog 5 років тому +1

      @@principalityofbelka6310 you are delusional

    • @melissawickersham9912
      @melissawickersham9912 5 років тому

      Barka Dog Take him to the infirmary!

    • @straightupoldies1991
      @straightupoldies1991 5 років тому

      Will send you to clear it with a hole in your boot and pay you below minimum wage

  • @citizenph1L
    @citizenph1L 5 років тому +2

    1.5 billion ? 🤔
    Should have been more expensive.
    Like 3.6 billion.
    Not great, but not terrible.

  • @ImplantedMemories
    @ImplantedMemories 5 років тому +6

    2:22 classic slav squat 😂

  • @BIGGAV2007
    @BIGGAV2007 4 роки тому +1

    Chernobyl will never see the outside world ever again.

  • @B1G_Dave
    @B1G_Dave 5 років тому +4

    All of this for a few ruptured water pipes

    • @yannicg
      @yannicg 5 років тому

      Actually no, the whole chain of problems that lead to the disaster started way earlier.

    • @kimjongun5676
      @kimjongun5676 4 роки тому

      @@yannicg so, its because my pen fell into the reactor?

    • @yannicg
      @yannicg 4 роки тому

      @@kimjongun5676 no, lol. The main reason is that the whole experient they were doing was bad organized and controlled

  • @SR71ABCD
    @SR71ABCD 4 роки тому +1

    Rumours say that the Helicopter that flew into the cable and crashed still remains ontop of the roof somewhere.

  • @ls1pr3dator9
    @ls1pr3dator9 5 років тому +5

    Does any one notice that they took down the famous cooling tower

    • @pastos6355
      @pastos6355 5 років тому

      They didn’t

    • @OpelMantaB1977
      @OpelMantaB1977 5 років тому +1

      @@pastos6355 they did. There are some footage around YT with it disambled in a unit(bionerd think has some footage)

  • @bucobuggato8342
    @bucobuggato8342 4 роки тому +1

    Well, at least if no one can access the center of the zone there will be no more emissions

  • @shanty6953
    @shanty6953 5 років тому +1

    No mention of the yet to be finished crane that’ll demolish the reactor so it can be disposed of more easily. There’s a Netflix movie of this for those who haven’t seen it yet

    • @krashd
      @krashd 5 років тому

      The crane was finished when the NSC was finished, it is part of the NSC, what would be the point of keeping workers safe by building the NSC away from the sarcophagus if workers then had to stand above the sarcophagus to build the crane?

  • @Glitcher2000
    @Glitcher2000 4 роки тому +8

    "In 2018, a solar energy plant was also set up right next to reactor 4."
    Shouldn't they have built a nuclear power plant instead?

    • @Skyhawk1998
      @Skyhawk1998 4 роки тому +3

      Just fire up Reactor Three, it's sitting right there.

    • @dzban02
      @dzban02 3 роки тому +1

      @@Skyhawk1998 or just fix reactor four lol it's easy

  • @Thebighanzi808
    @Thebighanzi808 4 роки тому +1

    It looks like a museum when they first walk in

  • @adder3597
    @adder3597 5 років тому +4

    Some hell of an engineering feat to get the New Safe Confinement built and in place, it really is an admirable bit of work by those involved...

    • @trajan231
      @trajan231 3 роки тому +1

      Especially as the crews (as I understand it) could only work 5 days on and then had to take 15 days off.

    • @adder3597
      @adder3597 3 роки тому

      @@trajan231 Probably around that just owing to keeping their doses down, yes.

    • @rocketman63
      @rocketman63 Рік тому

      It is a marvel of structural engineering!
      Sad that it exists only because of Chernobyl 4's catastrophic explosion, which in turn only occurred due to a chain reaction of errers and human hubris.

    • @rocketman63
      @rocketman63 Рік тому

      My word, I wrote "errers". One in itself!🥴

  • @shouldawent2elliot
    @shouldawent2elliot 3 роки тому +2

    I've always wondered what it looked like inside of the confinement

  • @AbhishekSingh-zp3zv
    @AbhishekSingh-zp3zv 5 років тому +4

    It's equivalent to a chest x-ray

  • @chilledspartan1174
    @chilledspartan1174 4 роки тому +1

    “The new shelter is designed to contain the radiation for the next 100 years.”
    Me: that will just about do for me ☺️

  • @patrickb8596
    @patrickb8596 5 років тому +9

    damn people don’t know Chernobyl is in Ukraine, which pisses me off

    • @Сашадуб-ц3у
      @Сашадуб-ц3у 5 років тому

      согласний

    • @michaelnakonecznyj6770
      @michaelnakonecznyj6770 5 років тому +4

      Pewdiepie the 2nd This SO TYPICAL of Western awareness, all the know is RUSSIA,POLAND, THE UKRAINE! Which “THE” UKRAINE IS COMPLETELY INCORRECT! JUST SIMPLY UKRAINE!
      LISTEN UP WESTERNERS! IT IS NO LONGER CHERNOBYL, BUT CHORNOBYL! AND KYIV, NOT KIEV, AND WESTERNERS TRY TO LEARN SOMETHING ABOUT OTHER COUNTRIES,
      THE UK and USA AREN’’T THE CENTRE OF ALL MANKIND!

    • @tranceman9670
      @tranceman9670 5 років тому +1

      Agreed

  • @Blakelikesfood
    @Blakelikesfood 4 роки тому +1

    $1,500,000,000.00
    You'd think they could acutely clean up the mess opposed to a structure that fixes nothing...if not on fire right now.

    • @Skyhawk1998
      @Skyhawk1998 4 роки тому +2

      This structure heads off a lot of potential problems down the road. That old sarcophagus was built in a huge hurry in a hostile environment, so it was living on borrowed time. Now there is a safe place to work on deconstructing it and decontaminating the wrecked power plant inside. If it collapses now, it'll be a huge mess, bit the fallout will be contained.

  • @gennadygorski9791
    @gennadygorski9791 5 років тому +4

    Totally Awesome!! Lets hope now they can safely start the disassembly and cleanup of the reactor.

    • @wommyu
      @wommyu 5 років тому

      There is no reactor

    • @gennadygorski9791
      @gennadygorski9791 5 років тому +3

      @@wommyu Then what do you call all of that junk inside the sarcophagus..? Chopped liver?

    • @krashd
      @krashd 5 років тому +1

      Chopped liver? He's delusional, take him to the infirmary!

  • @Notusingthisaccountanymore1
    @Notusingthisaccountanymore1 5 років тому +1

    Im a kid and i seen chernobyl without any problems.
    *Runs away when guy vomits blood*

  • @0Bennyman
    @0Bennyman 4 роки тому +3

    Looking forward to Season 2!

    • @ra_alf9467
      @ra_alf9467 3 роки тому +1

      Yes officer, this guy right here

  • @AleQuag
    @AleQuag 3 роки тому +1

    That dude is in shock get him out of here! it's just the equivalent of a chest x-ray.

  • @dominiksz3883
    @dominiksz3883 5 років тому +3

    I feel like I took my lethal dose of radiation for a lifetime just from this video.
    Not great, not terrible

  • @watsisname
    @watsisname 5 років тому +1

    "Radiation levels inside were estimated at more than 20 times the lethal dose." In what amount of time? Even standing next to the Elephant's Foot would take several minutes to give a lethal dose.

    • @bensemusx
      @bensemusx 5 років тому

      I'd assume places around the core are still lethal with minutes of exposure.

  • @sydtopia
    @sydtopia 5 років тому +3

    In 100 years do they put another shetler on top?

    • @Skyhawk1998
      @Skyhawk1998 4 роки тому

      By then the old sarcophagus should be gone and most of the dangerous materials removed or decayed away.

  • @HARVZ819
    @HARVZ819 3 роки тому +1

    Why do these guys not die you ask? Well they only stayed there for a short amount of time because more then 5minutes would have been fatal radiation

  • @nozyspy4967
    @nozyspy4967 5 років тому +7

    1:50 Those sparkles look like radiation hitting the camera...

    • @user-gs9bi9cq4h
      @user-gs9bi9cq4h 5 років тому +6

      Pretty sure it is.

    • @jarskil8862
      @jarskil8862 4 роки тому +2

      Theres tutorial on youtube how to create background raditation detector. You just need cold metal plate, some alcohol, sponges and vaccuum.

  • @Kini_the_Fox
    @Kini_the_Fox 4 роки тому

    This is cool and all, but i don’t like how the text covers up so much space on the screen. I think it’d be better to pay a little extra to have a narrator who reads this stuff so the screen isn’t obstructed. That’s just me tho

  • @Skrychi
    @Skrychi 5 років тому +4

    Glad I got to see it pre-cover-up.

  • @PantsuMann
    @PantsuMann 4 роки тому

    Why was this so expensive? It basically looks like a steel greenhouse. Wouldnt it be cheaper to constuct a huge mold and pour lead mixed concrete and cover it all?

  • @PhreshBboy
    @PhreshBboy 5 років тому +7

    next up on Modern Marvels

  • @ramade9040
    @ramade9040 4 роки тому

    €1.5 billion investment that only last for 100 years? That kinda fund could build entirely new city.
    That canopy should last for 1000 years at least.

  • @brennancattermole3898
    @brennancattermole3898 5 років тому +3

    A building...inside a building...inside a building...buildseption

  • @bryanmartinez6600
    @bryanmartinez6600 4 роки тому +1

    Aight pretty soon we'll have a Matryoshka doll.

  • @UNoBugMe1
    @UNoBugMe1 5 років тому +3

    Hhmmm, let me get that little piece of dandruff off you....Priceless. The best part of the whole video for sure.

  • @giov_moon
    @giov_moon 4 роки тому +1

    Why do I have a bad feeling about this?

  • @Oakleaf700
    @Oakleaf700 5 років тому +3

    Hope to goodness this keeps us safe.. {Europe}

  • @johnmontoya8160
    @johnmontoya8160 5 років тому +2

    Netflix has a great documentary on the building and placement of this new covering structure. It's amazing how they moved the structure over the exploded nuclear reactor.

  • @MrMoriarty100
    @MrMoriarty100 5 років тому +4

    Meanwhile let's get started with molten salt reactors which can burn nuclear waste as fuel. Chernobyl would be an ideal site for a fleet of these.

    • @theduck3876
      @theduck3876 5 років тому +1

      Come to think about it that's pretty cool