Fujifilm X-H2S: "Blistering High Speed" by X-Photographer Andrew Hall

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 32

  • @prastikokhalifah
    @prastikokhalifah 2 роки тому +4

    Fuji seriously needs to up their telephoto lens game

  • @JoeLamOfficial
    @JoeLamOfficial 2 роки тому +4

    1:50 small typo, text says - XF150-6000mm. 🙂

  • @carlosdias1940
    @carlosdias1940 2 роки тому +2

    ...a humble suggestion that might turn very expensive, relatively speaking: "One Day at the track with Andrew Hall", exploring the XH2 S envelope.
    Dear Fujifilm Australia any photographer covering surf, as Andrew excels on the track? e.g. Russell Ord? Would be proud to see an "investment" on action sports by Fuji, as I have been trying to "prove" since my XT3... humbly. Very capable gear for an "affordable" price.Cheers

  • @gbwalther3198
    @gbwalther3198 2 роки тому

    Why the wrist braces? Are they prescription? Are they designed for stabilization of the Fuji X-H2S camera shots? Please define, detail, specify and elucidate.

    • @carlosmozephoto
      @carlosmozephoto Рік тому +1

      Have a look at a previous video that focus also on Andrew and his story and you will have the answer to your questions. Regards

    • @gbwalther3198
      @gbwalther3198 Рік тому +2

      @@carlosmozephotoThanks Carlos. I did see a video later where Andrew Hall explains his medical challenges. So sad, but we have to admire him for : "Keeping on Shooting!" Right? If you know him, give him my regards from Fairbanks, Alaska. 😎😎

    • @carlosmozephoto
      @carlosmozephoto Рік тому +1

      Very welcome. I don't know him personally, but definitely there's a chance that we cross each other on a European circuit in a future. Cheers @@gbwalther3198

  • @povids4827
    @povids4827 2 місяці тому

    What happened?

    • @FujifilmAu
      @FujifilmAu  2 місяці тому

      Andrew made a ton of excellent images using his X-H2S + XF150-600mm and other lenses. He continues this work to this day, now also using the new XF500mmF5.6 lens! Check out his work at instagram.com/andrewh65/

  • @SovietLensReviews
    @SovietLensReviews 2 роки тому

    Not exactly inspiring shots in this one, and the whole "40 shots a second" falls a bit flat after the Nikon Z9 and its 120.

    • @tankivulture148
      @tankivulture148 2 роки тому +7

      Yes, but Fuji can shoot uncompressed raw at 40fps, Nikon can shoot 120 in cropped jpg

    • @BurningBroadcast
      @BurningBroadcast 2 роки тому +2

      You get 1/3rd of the FPS for 1/3rd of the price :)
      All jokes aside, the fact that Nikon has a body that does better at 6k+ doesn't really matter to the people who have Fuji lenses and like Fuji cameras right.
      If you have 10k and try to pick a system from scratch, sure. But most people aren't doing that.

    • @SovietLensReviews
      @SovietLensReviews 2 роки тому

      @@BurningBroadcast Fair enough! APS-C is a different beast

    • @bngr_bngr
      @bngr_bngr 2 роки тому

      @@tankivulture148 the Fujifilm is only a crop sensor camera.

    • @millionaire9122
      @millionaire9122 2 роки тому

      Do they cost the same? 🙄 Quit being a sadist. If you don’t like the camera, take a walk. No one is forcing you to like it.

  • @6042833
    @6042833 2 роки тому +3

    150-600 F8 @ 600mm, F8 Thank you but no thank you.

    • @BurningBroadcast
      @BurningBroadcast 2 роки тому +2

      Thats a difference of 2/3rd a stop compared to a f6.3, thats not significant. If you're shooting low light, you'll want a prime anyway. Don't see what the deal is.

    • @6042833
      @6042833 2 роки тому

      @@BurningBroadcast $2000 F8, Can you see now my friend?

    • @BurningBroadcast
      @BurningBroadcast 2 роки тому +5

      @@6042833 And if it was f6.3, it would suddenly be 0 problem? Like I said, it's 2/3rds of a stop.
      Canons 100-500 is f7.1 at 500mm at costs 3 grand.

    • @6042833
      @6042833 2 роки тому

      @@BurningBroadcast canon Is full frame camera. F7.1= F7.1.
      Fujifilm APS C sensor. F8=F12.
      You have received free lesson. If you need to be more educated I am glad to help.

    • @BurningBroadcast
      @BurningBroadcast 2 роки тому +3

      @@6042833 Judying by what you wrote and the statement you made to begin with, you can't teach me anything. Exposure doesn't change based on sensor size. Signal to noise does. Which if equal exposure between 2 unmentioned cameras (we weren't even talking about cameras) at unmentioned settings somehow justify's the Canon and not the Fuji to you. Incredible lapse in logic. Interesting.
      500mm @7.1 for 3 000$ "Its fine"
      600mm @f8 for 2000$. "No thanks!"
      You conveniently ignored my question if 6.3 would have been okay despite that being only 2/3rd of a stop better.
      But it sounds to me like you have 0 interest in either reflecting critically on your own statement or elaborating on it beyond repeating what was said before.
      I'll just take it for what it is, just somebody complaining about something they weren't going to buy to begin with.

  • @Vahit.Dursun.
    @Vahit.Dursun. 2 роки тому

    I heard this words for x-h1 before. Then I buy one x-h1. Then I release how it’s terrible. The results!!! I sold it. I hope this generation x-h2 and 2s to be good. Don’t do again same mistakes fujiiiiiiii.