That's how Hearst successors STILL DO BUSINESS in 2022, even on their non-news related (i.e., fashion magazines) publications. But that's NOT how "yellow journalism" started, even though Bill Hearst might've brought it to its' peak. It started decades earlier in England when papers that threw that kind (worse most likely) of "yellow journalism" were papers that were sized smaller (tabloid size) than the traditional (like the Times of London) and were printed in YELLOW PAPER, hence the name.
Used this with my freshman US History class - a great resource. I have been looking for a short clip on Yellow Journalism to supplement my Imperialism unit.
Worked on this topic in university for like 3 months just to find a 7 minute video. My main focus Was to find out the power of mass media on US foreign policy during the progressive era. Greetings from Münster Germany
Information wars are a lot more powerful then real wars, in 1914 when the war began there was already about 300 fiction books and articles that had been published in England about the evil Hun that ate babies and how they were going to invade Britain soon, the public already had a profound hatred of anything German before the war had even started. Hard to say whether the government was behind it or not but the effectiveness of the campaign left no doubt which led to the British becoming the masters of atrocity propaganda far, far ahead of anyone else, the viciousness of the claims was so outrageous it would never work today... unless you're the president of the US, starting in 1898 with this war here on Spain, every single one after that was based on lies easy to uncover, enless you are a US citizen, these people will believe anything without taking the time to do their own research and since they have over 1000 military bases all over the world, 7000 nukes and the most powerful army in the world, it gets scary sometimes.
If you are interested, research the impact Walter Cronkite had on the Viet Nam war immediat4ly after the Tett offensive. It was the single most decisive victory of the US and South Viet Nam against the VC which was destroyed as a fighting force. Yet Cronkite declared it a loss and the rest of the media did the same. A book featuring interviews by Nguyen Giap (the military leader of North Viet Nam) tells the story of how they viewed Cronkite and other "reporters" slanting the situation as an ally of theirs.
@@oldtanker4860 Yes, I remember that well, it wasn't an overwhelming victory for the US, after all the north Viets had iniltrated the towns without the US realizing it which was quite an achievement in itself but it was not either the defeat the media of the time presented, it was a great propaganda coup because whether it was intentional or not, the American pubic was deeply divided at that time so everything that came from Vietnam was filtered by the authorities to make it look good but that offensive could not be denied, it happened live on TV so that gave a serious blow to the war partisans who had lied about everything pretty much since the beginning, I remember seeing an interview with Gen Westmoreland and the poor man had to look at the camera and say he was not lying, he didn't convince anyone SO, when Cronkite said that a clear victory was not possible anymore, he wan't totally wrong. I think it simply hastened the end of a war that had no reason to be simply by exposing the lies that had to be told to the public to keep the damn thing going. Everything from the gulf of Tonkin to the overthrow of Prince Slhanouk was just a horrific pack of lies, it had to end, the US lost much more than a war over there, it lost its soul, 100,000 Vets have now committed suicide because they weren't able to live with what they had seen or done over there, almost twice the number of those who died in combat, something was wrong about that war, very wrong.
As a historian myself, the irony here is incredibly profound. "Historians" utilizing yellow journalistic strategist to explain yellow journalism and historical concepts. 😂 If you understand this, I wish I could have a coffee with you.
I've lived it my entire life. We can only go this far. I'm a US American in severe sufference ... Them being a different kind who understood why I was in sufference that helped Mee articulate my issue. We respected boundaries. Oddly , the people mistreating me or hostile kinds didn't. Have I said that before?
so basically, nothing has changed.
...the more they stay the same.
That's how Hearst successors STILL DO BUSINESS in 2022, even on their non-news related (i.e., fashion magazines) publications.
But that's NOT how "yellow journalism" started, even though Bill Hearst might've brought it to its' peak. It started decades earlier in England when papers that threw that kind (worse most likely) of "yellow journalism" were papers that were sized smaller (tabloid size) than the traditional (like the Times of London) and were printed in YELLOW PAPER, hence the name.
Increment improvement with AI technology.
You took the words out of my mouth
Now we've gone full circle ⭕
Yup
Fox News is yellow news
Used this with my freshman US History class - a great resource. I have been looking for a short clip on Yellow Journalism to supplement my Imperialism unit.
me who got this video from a freshman US history class
Worked on this topic in university for like 3 months just to find a 7 minute video. My main focus Was to find out the power of mass media on US foreign policy during the progressive era. Greetings from Münster Germany
Information wars are a lot more powerful then real wars, in 1914 when the war began there was already about 300 fiction books and articles that had been published in England about the evil Hun that ate babies and how they were going to invade Britain soon, the public already had a profound hatred of anything German before the war had even started. Hard to say whether the government was behind it or not but the effectiveness of the campaign left no doubt which led to the British becoming the masters of atrocity propaganda far, far ahead of anyone else, the viciousness of the claims was so outrageous it would never work today... unless you're the president of the US, starting in 1898 with this war here on Spain, every single one after that was based on lies easy to uncover, enless you are a US citizen, these people will believe anything without taking the time to do their own research and since they have over 1000 military bases all over the world, 7000 nukes and the most powerful army in the world, it gets scary sometimes.
If you are interested, research the impact Walter Cronkite had on the Viet Nam war immediat4ly after the Tett offensive. It was the single most decisive victory of the US and South Viet Nam against the VC which was destroyed as a fighting force. Yet Cronkite declared it a loss and the rest of the media did the same. A book featuring interviews by Nguyen Giap (the military leader of North Viet Nam) tells the story of how they viewed Cronkite and other "reporters" slanting the situation as an ally of theirs.
@@oldtanker4860 Yes, I remember that well, it wasn't an overwhelming victory for the US, after all the north Viets had iniltrated the towns without the US realizing it which was quite an achievement in itself but it was not either the defeat the media of the time presented, it was a great propaganda coup because whether it was intentional or not, the American pubic was deeply divided at that time so everything that came from Vietnam was filtered by the authorities to make it look good but that offensive could not be denied, it happened live on TV so that gave a serious blow to the war partisans who had lied about everything pretty much since the beginning, I remember seeing an interview with Gen Westmoreland and the poor man had to look at the camera and say he was not lying, he didn't convince anyone
SO, when Cronkite said that a clear victory was not possible anymore, he wan't totally wrong. I think it simply hastened the end of a war that had no reason to be simply by exposing the lies that had to be told to the public to keep the damn thing going. Everything from the gulf of Tonkin to the overthrow of Prince Slhanouk was just a horrific pack of lies, it had to end, the US lost much more than a war over there, it lost its soul, 100,000 Vets have now committed suicide because they weren't able to live with what they had seen or done over there, almost twice the number of those who died in combat, something was wrong about that war, very wrong.
This is what I try to tell people: there were no good old days. We were even more corrupt back then than we are now.
"You furnish the pictures, I'll furnish the war." < I assert Hearst really said it.
And now we have the Pulitzer prize for literature? Born from a corrupt paper
ouch.truth smh
As a historian myself, the irony here is incredibly profound. "Historians" utilizing yellow journalistic strategist to explain yellow journalism and historical concepts. 😂 If you understand this, I wish I could have a coffee with you.
undertsood... a day for a lenghty conversation.. a round about one.. lol
Very interesting.
Glad you think so!
2:22 Mitchell Stephens: Professor Nosferatu. 😄
Just like the internet we have today
more like the main stream media we have today calling for war war war in Ukraine
Hey,are you from Journalism Department?
Yellow journalism is we can only so far to help you articulate your problem.
I've lived it my entire life. We can only go this far. I'm a US American in severe sufference ... Them being a different kind who understood why I was in sufference that helped Mee articulate my issue. We respected boundaries. Oddly , the people mistreating me or hostile kinds didn't. Have I said that before?
7:10 Hold up 3,000 vs 55,000 casualty ratio? Thats not a treaty thats a conditional surrender lol.
That's because that number is made up lol
Yes!
true
CNN= Yellow journalism!
FOX NEWS= Orange Journalism.
@@stephenwright8824 Joe Rogan = clear journalism!
All mainstream media (including Fox…) = Yellow Journalism
All=yellow. Logic thinking
Please, almost everyone has its' own slant, right or left... (Faux News, anyone? Even as I know that CNN slides too far to the left to my liking)
Mrs X
Genius here
Hogans alley? Rampant anti irish bigotry.
lol wow